Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 3.3

Old Age and Death

Jarāmaraṇasutta

Setting
At Sāvatthī; no further narrative detail given
Speakers
The Buddha and King Pasenadi of Kosala
Form
A direct question in prose, an unqualified answer spanning three social categories, and a closing simile-verse
Length
~1.5 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — plain in claim, notable for including even arahants within its scope

Why this discourse

Pasenadi asks whether anyone reborn is exempt from old age and death. The Buddha's answer is unqualified and spans three categories in ascending significance: not wealthy aristocrats, brahmins, or householders with all their gold and property; and — most strikingly — not even mendicants who have ended the defilements and are rightly freed through enlightenment. Their bodies too are liable to break up. The closing verse distinguishes what does age from what does not: the body ages like a king's chariot, but the truth of the good never does.

Reading guide

A question with an expected but still striking answer

Pasenadi's question invites a straightforward denial, and the Buddha gives one, but the way the answer is structured — building from the wealthy to the enlightened — makes its most notable claim land last: even full liberation does not exempt the body from aging and death.

Wealth offers no exemption

The first category the Buddha names is the wealthy — aristocrats, brahmins, householders ‘with lots of gold and silver’ — establishing that material advantage, however extensive, has no bearing on this particular fact of existence.

Even arahants' bodies break up

The second category is the most doctrinally significant: mendicants who have ‘ended the defilements, completed the spiritual journey…and are rightly freed through enlightenment’ still have bodies ‘liable to break up and be laid to rest’ — distinguishing full liberation from physical immortality with unambiguous clarity.

A chariot that wears out, a truth that does not

The closing verse's central image compares the body to a king's ‘fancy chariot’, an object of status and craftsmanship that nonetheless wears out with use — a comparison pointed directly at Pasenadi's own royal station.

The good proclaiming to the good

The verse's final line — ‘so the good proclaim to the good’ — frames this teaching not as private insight but as something transmitted between practitioners, one generation or one person passing the same recognition to another.

Key terms

jarāmaraṇa — “old age and death” — the pair of inevitabilities Pasenadi's question asks whether anyone is exempt from.
khīṇāsava — “one who has ended the defilements” — the Buddha's own term for the arahants named as still subject to bodily breakup.
sammadaññā vimutta — “rightly freed through enlightenment” — part of the fuller description of the perfected mendicants included in the Buddha's answer.
citta ratha — “fancy chariot” — the verse's image of royal status wearing out, addressed pointedly to the king himself.
sataṁ dhammo — “the truth of the good” — what the verse says never grows old, in contrast to the body.

The text

The discourse in full: Pasenadi's question, the Buddha's unqualified answer, and the closing chariot verse. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At Sāvatthī. Seated to one side, King Pasenadi said to the Buddha, “Sir, for someone who has been reborn, is there any exemption from old age and death?” “Great king, for someone who has been reborn, there’s no exemption from old age and death. Even for well-to-do aristocrats, brahmins, or householders—rich, affluent, and wealthy, with lots of gold and silver, lots of property and assets, and lots of money and grain—when they’re born, there’s no exemption from old age and death. Even for mendicants who are perfected—who have ended the defilements, completed the spiritual journey, done what had to be done, laid down the burden, achieved their heart’s goal, utterly ended the fetter of continued existence, and are rightly freed through enlightenment—their bodies are liable to break up and be laid to rest.” That is what the Buddha said. …

§2“Fancy chariots of kings wear out, and even this body gets old. But the truth of the good never gets old—so the good proclaim to the good.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What does King Pasenadi ask in this discourse?
Correct: A. A direct question inviting an unqualified answer.
Question 2 of 10
Does the Buddha's answer exempt the wealthy?
Correct: A. Material advantage is given no special bearing on old age and death.
Question 3 of 10
Does the Buddha's answer exempt fully liberated mendicants?
Correct: A. The answer's most doctrinally significant claim, distinguishing liberation from physical immortality.
Question 4 of 10
What image does the closing verse use for the body?
Correct: A. A comparison pointed directly at Pasenadi's own royal station.
Question 5 of 10
What does the verse say never grows old?
Correct: A. Distinguished directly from the aging chariot in the same verse.
Question 6 of 10
What does the verse's final line say about this truth?
Correct: A. Framing the teaching as something transmitted between practitioners.
Question 7 of 10
How does the structure of the Buddha's answer build toward its strongest claim?
Correct: A. Making the arahant example, its most striking claim, land last.
Question 8 of 10
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: A. A bare setting note, consistent with several discourses in this collection.
Question 9 of 10
What term does the Buddha use for a mendicant who has ended the defilements?
Correct: A. The term specifically describing the arahants named in this discourse's answer.
Question 10 of 10
What is the overall relationship between physical mortality and full liberation, according to this discourse?
Correct: A. The discourse's central clarification, stated with unambiguous directness.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0