Reading guide
A second reflection, sharing SN 3.4's exact structure
This discourse repeats SN 3.4's opening formula almost word for word — a private reflection, a question posed to himself, a reasoned answer — substituting protection for love as the quality under examination, making the two discourses a clear matched pair.
A king's own military escort, found insufficient
The reflection's most pointed detail is specific to Pasenadi's own circumstances: even ‘a company of elephants, cavalry, chariots, or infantry’ — the literal apparatus of royal protection — is declared insufficient if the person so guarded acts badly, a king reasoning against the very security his own office provides.
Interior versus exterior, the reasoning's hinge
The distinction the king draws is explicit: military escort is ‘exterior’ protection, while ethical conduct is ‘interior’ — and only the interior kind counts as genuinely protecting the person who has it, regardless of what exterior protection surrounds them.
The same elided-confirmation pattern as SN 3.4
As with SN 3.4, the Buddha's confirmation includes an elided repetition of the king's own words, blank in the source, before the discourse moves to its own closing verse rather than merely restating the king's reasoning in verse form.
A four-line verse compressing the whole argument
Where SN 3.4's closing verses ran to several stanzas developing a related but distinct point about death, this discourse's verse is far more compact: four lines simply naming restraint of body, speech, and mind, and everywhere, as what earns the name ‘protected’.
Key terms
The text
§1At Sāvatthī. Seated to one side, King Pasenadi said to the Buddha, “Just now, sir, as I was in private retreat this thought came to mind. ‘Who are those who protect themselves? And who are those who don’t protect themselves?’ Then it occurred to me: ‘Those who do bad things by way of body, speech, and mind don’t protect themselves. Even if they’re protected by a company of elephants, cavalry, chariots, or infantry, they still don’t protect themselves. Why is that? Because such protection is exterior, not interior. That’s why they don’t protect themselves. Those who do good things by way of body, speech, and mind do protect themselves. Even if they’re not protected by a company of elephants, cavalry, chariots, or infantry, they still protect themselves. Why is that? Because such protection is interior, not exterior. That’s why they do protect themselves.’”
§2“That’s so true, great king! That’s so true!” said the Buddha. And he repeated the king’s statement, adding:
§3“Restraint of the body is good; restraint of speech is good; restraint of mind is good; everywhere, restraint is good. A sincere person, restrained everywhere, is said to be ‘protected’.”
Self-check quiz
Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.