Reading guide
A vagga named for its own setting
Devadaha, a Sakyan town distinct from Kapilavatthu, gives this vagga its name simply by being where the Buddha is staying when he addresses the mendicants — this reading guide asserts nothing further about the town beyond what the text itself states.
Neither all nor none
The discourse's own opening move refuses both extremes: not every mendicant has work to do with diligence at the six fields of contact, and not no mendicant does. What follows is a clean division by attainment, not a blanket rule.
Arahants: work already done
Perfected ones are described with the full standard epithet chain — defilements ended, the spiritual journey completed, the burden laid down, rightly freed — and declared incapable of negligence precisely because their own work with diligence is already finished, not because diligence never mattered to them.
Trainees: what diligence actually looks like
For mendicants still training, the discourse gives a concrete, fourfold description rather than an abstract exhortation: encountering pleasant and unpleasant sights (and, after the shared ellipsis, pleasant and unpleasant ideas) again and again without those sights occupying the mind, energy roused and unflagging, mindfulness established and lucid, the body tranquil, the mind unified in samādhi.
Key terms
The text
§1At one time the Buddha was staying in the land of the Sakyans, near the Sakyan town named Devadaha. There the Buddha addressed the mendicants:
§2“When it comes to the six fields of contact, mendicants, I don’t say that all mendicants have work to do with diligence, nor do I say that none of them have work to do with diligence. I say that, when it comes to the six fields of contact, mendicants don’t have work to do with diligence if they are perfected, with defilements ended, having completed the spiritual journey, done what had to be done, laid down the burden, achieved their heart’s goal, utterly ended the fetter of continued existence, and become rightly freed through enlightenment. Why is that? They’ve done their work with diligence, and are incapable of negligence.
§3I say that, when it comes to the six fields of contact, mendicants do have work to do with diligence if they are trainees, who haven’t achieved their heart’s desire, but live aspiring to the supreme sanctuary from the yoke. Why is that? There are sights known by the eye that are pleasant and also those that are unpleasant. Though experiencing them again and again they don’t occupy the mind. Their energy is roused up and unflagging, their mindfulness is established and lucid, their body is tranquil and undisturbed, and their mind is immersed in samādhi and unified. Seeing this fruit of diligence, I say that those mendicants have work to do with diligence when it comes to the six fields of contact. …
§4There are ideas known by the mind that are pleasant and also those that are unpleasant. Though experiencing them again and again they don’t occupy the mind. Their energy is roused up and unflagging, their mindfulness is established and lucid, their body is tranquil and undisturbed, and their mind is immersed in samādhi and unified. Seeing this fruit of diligence, I say that those mendicants have work to do with diligence when it comes to the six fields of contact.”
Self-check quiz
5 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.