Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 35.3

The Interior as Not-Self

Ajjhattānattasutta — Aniccavagga

Setting
Sāvatthī
Speakers
The Buddha addressing the mendicants
Form
The shortest possible starting point in this vagga's own three-term chain, beginning directly at not-self
Length
~1 minute to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — straightforward once SN 35.1's own chain is clear

Why this discourse

This discourse closes this vagga's own first three-term cycle, declaring the six interior sense fields not-self directly — the final and shortest possible link in the chain SN 35.1 first traced in full. With impermanence, suffering, and now not-self all applied to the interior sense fields, SN 35.4–6 will repeat this identical three-term cycle for the exterior sense fields instead.

Reading guide

The shortest possible starting point

"The eye is not-self. And what's not-self should be truly seen …" — this discourse skips straight to the chain's own final term, requiring no further derivation, the most compressed possible starting point in this vagga's own recurring formula.

Completing the interior's own three-term cycle

With this discourse, all three terms (impermanent, suffering, not-self) have now been applied to the six interior sense fields across SN 35.1–3, closing this vagga's own first cycle.

A structural pivot to the exterior sense fields

SN 35.4–6 will repeat this identical three-discourse pattern (impermanent, suffering, not-self) for the six exterior sense fields — sights, sounds, smells, tastes, touches, and ideas — mirroring this cycle's own shape exactly.

A vagga built on a genuine 2×2×3 structure

This vagga's own full twelve-discourse design becomes visible with this discourse: two domains (interior, exterior) times two temporal framings (present alone, or past-present-future) times three terms (impermanent, suffering, not-self) equals exactly twelve discourses.

Key terms

anattā — not-self — this discourse's own direct starting point, the third and final term in this vagga's own three-part cycle
dukkha — suffering — SN 35.2's own starting point, not restated here
ajjhatta — interior — the six sense faculties this discourse concerns, closing their own three-term cycle
bāhira — exterior — the six sense objects whose own identical three-term cycle begins next at SN 35.4
peyyāla — an elision mark — here compressing both the middle four sense fields and the closing liberation formula

The text

The complete discourse, with the middle sense fields and closing formula compressed exactly as bilara-data preserves them. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1“Mendicants, the eye is not-self. And what’s not-self should be truly seen with right understanding like this: ‘This is not mine, I am not this, this is not my self.’ The ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind are not-self. And what’s not-self should be truly seen with right understanding like this: ‘This is not mine, I am not this, this is not my self.’ Seeing this … They understand: ‘… there is nothing further for this place.’”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

5 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 5
Where does this discourse begin in this vagga's own three-term chain?
Correct: A. The shortest possible starting point in this vagga's own recurring formula.
Question 2 of 5
What does this discourse complete?
Correct: A. All three terms have now been applied to the six interior sense fields.
Question 3 of 5
What happens at SN 35.4–6, immediately following this discourse?
Correct: A. Sights, sounds, smells, tastes, touches, and ideas, mirroring this cycle's own shape.
Question 4 of 5
What full structure does this vagga's own twelve discourses reveal?
Correct: A. Two domains times two temporal framings times three terms equals exactly twelve discourses.
Question 5 of 5
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: A. Consistent with this saṃyutta's other discourses.
Answered 0 of 5 · Correct 0