Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 35.62

The Depletion of All Fuel for Grasping (2nd)

Dutiyasabbupādānapariyādānasutta — Avijjāvagga

Setting
Sāvatthī (by cross-reference)
Speakers
The Buddha questioning the mendicants directly, who answer in turn
Form
The same subject as SN 35.61, now cast as a direct question-and-answer catechism rather than a declarative announcement — closing this vagga with its own colophon and uddāna
Length
~2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★★☆☆ — the dialogic form and the closing colophon both reward careful attention

Why this discourse

This discourse closes Avijjāvagga, completing the pair begun at SN 35.61 (both titled for depleting “fuel for grasping”) but recasting it entirely in dialogue: rather than the Buddha announcing the teaching and reciting the chain of dependent origination and disillusionment, he questions the mendicants directly — “Is the eye permanent or impermanent?”, “Suffering, sir”, “fit to be regarded thus: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?” — the same catechism form this project already met at SN 35.32, closing Sabbavagga. And where SN 35.60–61 closed on grasping specifically understood or depleted, this discourse restores this project's own full standard liberation formula in its closing lines: disillusionment, fading desire, freedom, the knowledge of that freedom, and the declaration that rebirth is ended — the same complete formula SN 35.1 itself used to open Aniccavagga, now closing Avijjāvagga in turn. Beyond the discourse itself, this file's own closing lines carry a colophon reading “Avijjāvaggo paṭhamo” — “Avijjāvagga is the first” — which, at first glance, seems to contradict this vagga's own position as the sixth of Saḷāyatanasaṃyutta's own nineteen vaggas. It does not: as this project already confirmed at SN 22.52 and SN 35.52, vagga colophons number a vagga's own position within its own paṇṇāsaka (fifty), not across the whole saṃyutta — and Avijjāvagga, opening immediately after Sabbaaniccavagga closed the first fifty at SN 35.52, is indeed the first vagga of Saḷāyatanasaṃyutta's own second paṇṇāsaka.

Reading guide

A pair completes, recast as dialogue

SN 35.61's own declarative chain becomes, here, a direct question-and-answer catechism — the Buddha asking whether the eye (and each of the remaining five sense fields, and what arises from each) is permanent, whether what's impermanent is suffering, and whether what's impermanent and suffering is fit to be regarded as self, the mendicants answering in turn.

The same catechism this project already met at Sabbavagga's own close

This question-and-answer form is not new to Book IV: SN 35.32, closing Sabbavagga, already used the identical structure — the same three questions (permanent?, suffering?, self?), asked and answered in sequence for each sense field.

The full liberation formula, restored

Unlike SN 35.60 and SN 35.61, which each closed narrowly on grasping specifically understood or depleted, this discourse goes the rest of the way: disillusionment, fading desire, freedom, the knowledge of that freedom, and the standard declaration that rebirth is ended — the same complete sequence SN 35.1 used to open this book.

A colophon that seems to contradict itself, and doesn't

This file's own closing colophon, “Avijjāvaggo paṭhamo” (“Avijjāvagga is the first”), does not claim this is the saṃyutta's own first vagga — it is the sixth. As already confirmed at SN 22.52 (Book III's own Mūlapaṇṇāsaka) and SN 35.52 (this book's own first paṇṇāsaka), such colophons number a vagga's own position within its own paṇṇāsaka, not across the whole saṃyutta.

A second paṇṇāsaka begins, confirmed from the text itself

This file's own closing uddāna names all ten of this vagga's own discourses in order — ignorance, two on the fetters, two more on the defilements, two more again on the underlying tendencies, and finally understanding and two depletions on grasping — the same ten discourses this reading guide has now traced individually. Left untranslated in Sujato's own English, this reading guide describes rather than quotes its content, exactly as this project has treated every other untranslated closing marker.

Key terms

paṇṇāsaka — a fifty — a block of fifty discourses; this vagga's own colophon confirms it opens Saḷāyatanasaṃyutta's own second one
avijjā — ignorance — this vagga's own name and opening target, tying together the whole vagga at its own close
pariyādāna — depletion — this discourse's own closing achievement, completing the pair with SN 35.61
uddāna — a mnemonic summary verse — this file's own closing verse, naming this vagga's own ten discourses by target
vaggo tena pavuccati — “by that the chapter is called” — a standard closing formula found across many vagga-uddānas in the Pali canon, closing this one as well

The text

The complete discourse: a direct question-and-answer catechism, closing on this project's own full standard liberation formula rather than SN 35.60-61's own narrower closings on grasping alone. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1“Mendicants, I will teach you the principle for depleting all fuel for grasping. Listen … And what is the principle for depleting all fuel for grasping?

§2What do you think, mendicants? Is the eye permanent or impermanent?” “Impermanent, sir.” “But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?” “Suffering, sir.” “But if it’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, is it fit to be regarded thus: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?” “No, sir.”

§3“Sights … eye consciousness … eye contact … The pleasant, painful, or neutral feeling that arises dependent on eye contact: is that permanent or impermanent?” “Impermanent, sir.” …

§4“Ear … nose … tongue … body … mind … ideas … mind consciousness … mind contact … The pleasant, painful, or neutral feeling that arises dependent on mind contact: is that permanent or impermanent?” “Impermanent, sir.”

§5“But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?” “Suffering, sir.” “But if it’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, is it fit to be regarded thus: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?” “No, sir.”

§6“Seeing this, a learned noble disciple grows disillusioned with the eye, sights, eye consciousness, and eye contact. And they grow disillusioned with the painful, pleasant, or neutral feeling that arises dependent on eye contact. They grow disillusioned with the ear … nose … tongue … body … They grow disillusioned with the mind, ideas, mind consciousness, and mind contact. And they grow disillusioned with the painful, pleasant, or neutral feeling that arises dependent on mind contact. Being disillusioned, desire fades away. When desire fades away they’re freed. When they’re freed, they know they’re freed. They understand: ‘Rebirth is ended, the spiritual journey has been completed, what had to be done has been done, there is nothing further for this place.’ This is the principle for depleting all fuel for grasping.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

6 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 6
How does this discourse's form differ from SN 35.60-61 before it?
Correct: A. The Buddha asks whether each field is permanent, suffering, and self, the mendicants answering in turn.
Question 2 of 6
Which earlier discourse in this book already used the same catechism form?
Correct: A. The identical three-question sequence, asked and answered for each sense field.
Question 3 of 6
How does this discourse's own closing formula differ from SN 35.60-61's own closings?
Correct: A. The same complete sequence SN 35.1 itself used to open this book.
Question 4 of 6
What does this discourse's own vagga colophon, “Avijjāvaggo paṭhamo,” actually mean, given that Avijjāvagga is this saṃyutta's own sixth vagga?
Correct: A. Vagga colophons number a vagga's own position within its own paṇṇāsaka, not across the whole saṃyutta.
Question 5 of 6
Which earlier discourse in this project already established that vagga colophons number within their own paṇṇāsaka?
Correct: A. Both marked the close of their own saṃyutta's own first fifty.
Question 6 of 6
How many discourses make up Avijjāvagga, confirmed by its own closing uddāna?
Correct: A. Matching the count this reading guide has traced page by page across SN 35.53-62.
Answered 0 of 6 · Correct 0