Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 35.63

With Migajāla (1st)

Paṭhamamigajālasutta — Migajālavagga

Setting
Sāvatthī
Speakers
Venerable Migajāla questioning the Buddha
Form
A question about the meaning of “living alone” versus “living with a partner,” answered with the sixfold relishing-lust-yoking chain given in full, twice over — once for each definition
Length
~2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — familiar terms, applied to an unexpected question

Why this discourse

This discourse opens Migajālavagga, Saḷāyatanasaṃyutta's own seventh vagga (SN 35.63–73) — and, unlike every vagga this project has built across Book IV so far, one whose eleven discourses are each stored as their own independent bilara-data file, with no peyyāla range merged into a single file. That independence does not mean every discourse is written out in full: two of this vagga's own discourses (SN 35.66–67, still ahead) collapse to a bare cross-reference in both the Pali root and Sujato's own English, exactly like SN 35.56–58 earlier in this book — they are simply never merged into a shared file with their neighbours the way SN 35.43–51 or SN 33.6–10 were. Migajāla, a mendicant this project has not yet met by name, asks the Buddha to define “living alone” (eka vihāra) and “living with a partner” (sadutiya vihāra) — terms that on their face sound like they concern physical company, but the Buddha's own answer relocates them entirely onto the six sense fields: whoever approves, welcomes, and clings to any liked sight, sound, smell, taste, touch, or idea is “living with a partner” no matter how remote their forest dwelling; whoever does not is “living alone” no matter how crowded their village lodging. Craving itself, not any human companion, is the “partner” in question.

Reading guide

A question about solitude, redirected

Migajāla's question sounds like it concerns physical company, but the Buddha's own answer relocates it entirely onto the six sense fields — the same reframing move this saṃyutta has already used for “the world” and, later in this very vagga, for “Māra” and “a sentient being.”

Two full sixfold sweeps, not one

The full chain — eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, mind — is elaborated twice over, once for “living with a partner” and once for “living alone,” each closing with its own refrain. This vagga's own commitment to independent files, rather than merged peyyāla ranges, shows up here as genuine double elaboration rather than one elaboration plus an elided repeat.

A short chain: approve, relish, lust, yoke

Approving and clinging to a liked object gives rise to relishing (nandi); relishing gives rise to lust (rāga); lust gives rise to yoking (saṃyoga) — a compact causal chain distinct from the dependent-origination chain that closed Avijjāvagga (SN 35.60–62) and the gratification/drawback/escape triad that structured Yamakavagga.

The refrain: craving is the partner

Both halves close by naming craving (taṇhā) itself as the true “partner” — present and un-given-up for the fettered mendicant, given up for the free one — explaining why physical isolation is neither necessary nor sufficient for “living alone” in the sense this discourse means.

Key terms

eka vihāra — living alone — redefined here away from literal solitude, toward freedom from clinging
sadutiya vihāra — living with a partner — redefined; the “partner” turns out to be craving itself
nandi — relishing — the first link in this discourse's own short chain
rāga — lust — the second link, arising from relishing
saṃyoga — yoking — the third link, the fettered state itself, arising from lust

The text

The complete discourse: Migajāla's own question, then both definitions given in full — “living with a partner” first, “living alone” second. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At Sāvatthī. Then Venerable Migajāla went up to the Buddha … and said to him: “Sir, they speak of one who lives alone. How is one who lives alone defined? And how is living with a partner defined?”

§2“Migajāla, there are sights known by the eye, which are likable, desirable, agreeable, pleasant, sensual, and arousing. If a mendicant approves, welcomes, and keeps clinging to them, this gives rise to relishing. When there’s relishing there’s lust. When there’s lust there is yoking. A mendicant who is fettered by relishing is said to live with a partner. There are sounds … smells … tastes … touches … There are ideas known by the mind, which are likable, desirable, agreeable, pleasant, sensual, and arousing. If a mendicant approves, welcomes, and keeps clinging to them, this gives rise to relishing. When there’s relishing there’s lust. When there’s lust there is yoking. A mendicant who is fettered by relishing is said to live with a partner. A mendicant who lives like this is said to live with a partner, even if they frequent remote lodgings in the wilderness and the forest that are quiet and still, far from the madding crowd, remote from human settlements, and fit for retreat. Why is that? For craving is their partner, and they haven’t given it up. That’s why they’re said to live with a partner.

§3There are sights known by the eye, which are likable, desirable, agreeable, pleasant, sensual, and arousing. If a mendicant doesn’t approve, welcome, and keep clinging to them, relishing ceases. When there’s no relishing there’s no lust. When there’s no lust there’s no yoking. A mendicant who is not fettered by relishing is said to live alone. There are sounds … smells … tastes … touches … There are ideas known by the mind, which are likable, desirable, agreeable, pleasant, sensual, and arousing. If a mendicant doesn’t approve, welcome, and keep clinging to them, relishing ceases. When there’s no relishing there’s no lust. When there’s no lust there’s no yoking. A mendicant who is not fettered by relishing is said to live alone. A mendicant who lives like this is said to live alone, even if they live within a village crowded by monks, nuns, laymen, and laywomen; by rulers and their chief ministers, and monastics of other religions and their disciples. Why is that? For craving is their partner, and they have given it up. That’s why they’re said to live alone.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

5 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 5
What does Migajāla ask the Buddha to define?
Correct: A. Terms that sound physical, but the Buddha's answer relocates them onto the six senses.
Question 2 of 5
According to the Buddha's answer, what makes a mendicant “live with a partner,” regardless of where they physically dwell?
Correct: A. Even a remote forest hermit who clings this way is said to live with a partner.
Question 3 of 5
What three-step chain leads from approving a liked sense object to being fettered?
Correct: A. Nandi, rāga, saṃyoga — this discourse's own short chain.
Question 4 of 5
How is this vagga's own commitment to independent files (rather than merged peyyāla ranges) visible in this particular discourse?
Correct: A. Genuine double elaboration, unlike a template stated once and assumed for its pair.
Question 5 of 5
What or who is named as the true “partner” in this discourse's own closing refrain?
Correct: A. Present and un-given-up for the fettered mendicant, given up for the free one.
Answered 0 of 5 · Correct 0