Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 35.96

Liable to Decline

Parihānadhammasutta — Saḷavagga

Setting
Not restated in this discourse
Speakers
The Buddha alone, no interlocutor named
Form
Three teachings in sequence, sharing one structure: decline, non-decline, and mastery, each run across all six senses
Length
~2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — a clear diagnostic, not a difficult argument

Why this discourse

This discourse offers a practical diagnostic rather than a doctrinal argument: when bad, unskillful states arise on contact with any of the six senses, tolerating them — not giving them up, not eliminating them — is decline; giving them up is non-decline; and a third, higher case is named besides — the six fields of mastery, where such states simply do not arise in the first place. The same topic is addressed elsewhere in the Suttas (AN 6.62, AN 10.55), and a related discourse states plainly that a stream-enterer is no longer liable to decline at all (AN 6.97) — this discourse supplies the diagnostic such a claim depends on.

Reading guide

Three teachings, one structure

Liability to decline, freedom from it, and full mastery are each defined in turn, all three run identically across the six senses: eye given in full, ear through body compressed by ellipsis, mind given in full again.

Liable to decline: tolerating what arises

When bad, unskillful states — memories and thoughts that tighten fetters — arise on contact, a mendicant who tolerates them, not giving them up, getting rid of them, eliminating them, or obliterating them, should recognize skillful qualities are declining.

Not liable to decline: the same states, refused

The identical bad states may arise; the difference is entirely in the response. Not tolerating them, but giving them up at once, marks non-decline — the same four-verb formula (give up, get rid of, eliminate, obliterate) used for uprooting elsewhere in this book.

The six fields of mastery: a further case still

A third case is named besides the first two: bad states simply failing to arise at all on contact. This is called a field mastered — not merely handled well after arising, but no longer arising in the first place, the highest of the three cases this discourse distinguishes.

Key terms

parihāni — decline — this discourse's own first target, defined by what a mendicant tolerates rather than gives up
saṅkappavitakkā saṁyojaniyā — memories and thoughts that tighten fetters — what arises on contact in every one of the three cases this discourse distinguishes
pajahati vinodeti byantīkaroti anabhāvaṁ gameti — give up, get rid of, eliminate, obliterate — the four-verb formula marking the difference between decline and non-decline
abhibhāyatana — field of mastery — this discourse's own third and highest case, where bad states do not arise on contact at all
sotāpanna — stream-enterer — named in a related discourse (AN 6.97) as no longer liable to decline, the stakes this diagnostic ultimately serves

The text

The complete discourse: three teachings on decline, non-decline, and the six fields of mastery, each run across all six senses. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1“Mendicants, I will teach you who is liable to decline, who is not liable to decline, and the six fields of mastery. Listen … And how is someone liable to decline? When a mendicant sees a sight with the eye, bad, unskillful phenomena arise: memories and thoughts that tighten fetters. Suppose that mendicant tolerates them and doesn’t give them up, get rid of them, eliminate them, and obliterate them. They should understand: ‘My skillful qualities are declining. For this is what the Buddha calls decline.’

§2Furthermore, when a mendicant hears a sound … smells an odor … tastes a flavor … feels a touch … knows an idea with the mind, bad, unskillful phenomena arise: memories and thoughts that tighten fetters. If that mendicant tolerates them and doesn’t give them up, get rid of them, eliminate them, and obliterate them, they should understand: ‘My skillful qualities are declining. For this is what the Buddha calls decline.’ That’s how someone is liable to decline.

§3And how is someone not liable to decline? When a mendicant sees a sight with the eye, bad, unskillful phenomena arise: memories and thoughts that tighten fetters. Suppose that mendicant doesn’t tolerate them but gives them up, gets rid of them, eliminates them, and obliterates them. They should understand: ‘My skillful qualities are not declining. For this is what the Buddha calls non-decline.’

§4Furthermore, when a mendicant hears a sound … smells an odor … tastes a flavor … feels a touch … knows an idea with the mind, bad, unskillful phenomena arise: memories and thoughts that tighten fetters. Suppose that mendicant doesn’t tolerate them but gives them up, gets rid of them, eliminates them, and obliterates them. They should understand: ‘My skillful qualities are not declining. For this is what the Buddha calls non-decline.’ That’s how someone is not liable to decline.

§5And what are the six fields of mastery? When a mendicant sees a sight with the eye, bad, unskillful phenomena don’t arise: memories and thoughts that tighten fetters. They should understand: ‘This sense field has been mastered. For this is what the Buddha calls a field of mastery.’ … Furthermore, when a mendicant knows an idea with the mind, bad, unskillful phenomena don’t arise: memories and thoughts that tighten fetters. They should understand: ‘This sense field has been mastered. For this is what the Buddha calls a field of mastery.’ These are the six fields of mastery.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

5 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 5
What marks someone as “liable to decline,” on this discourse's own account?
Correct: A. The same bad states may arise for anyone; the difference is entirely in the response.
Question 2 of 5
What four-verb formula marks the difference between decline and non-decline?
Correct: A. Used for uprooting elsewhere in this book as well.
Question 3 of 5
What third case does this discourse name besides decline and non-decline?
Correct: A. Not merely handling bad states well, but their failing to arise on contact in the first place.
Question 4 of 5
What does a related discourse (AN 6.97) say about a stream-enterer's own liability to decline?
Correct: A. The stakes this discourse's own diagnostic ultimately serves.
Question 5 of 5
Across how many senses does each of the three teachings run?
Correct: A. Eye given in full, ear through body compressed, mind given in full again.
Answered 0 of 5 · Correct 0