Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 35.97

One Who Lives Negligently

Pamādavihārīsutta — Saḷavagga

Setting
Not restated in this discourse
Speakers
The Buddha alone, no interlocutor named
Form
Two mirrored causal chains, seven links each, run across all six senses
Length
~2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★★☆☆ — a chain worth tracing link by link

Why this discourse

Pamāda — negligence — comes from a root meaning to be mad or drunk, and is usually an ethical term; this discourse extends it across the entire path. Living with the senses unrestrained pollutes the mind on contact, and from there a seven-link chain runs downhill: no joy, no rapture, no tranquility, suffering, no immersion in samādhi, and finally principles (dhammā — the four noble truths, dependent origination, and the like) failing to become clear. The same chain, mirrored, runs uphill from restraint to clarity. A related discourse (SN 12.23) links this same uplifting process to samādhi as a supporting condition, already part of this project's own Book II.

Reading guide

An ethical term extended to the whole path

Pamāda's own root sense is being mad or drunk; here it names not a lapse in conduct but the entire downhill consequence of leaving the senses unrestrained, traced link by link to its final result.

The downhill chain: negligence

Unrestrained eye faculty pollutes the mind on contact with sights; a polluted mind has no joy; no joy, no rapture; no rapture, no tranquility; no tranquility, suffering; suffering, no immersion in samādhi; no samādhi, principles remain unclear. The same seven links repeat for ear through mind.

The uphill chain: diligence

Restrained faculties leave the mind unpolluted on contact; an unpolluted mind gives rise to joy; joy to rapture; rapture to bodily tranquility; tranquility to bliss; bliss to immersion in samādhi; samādhi to clear principles — the identical seven links, reversed at every step.

Key terms

pamāda — negligence — from a root meaning to be mad or drunk, here extended across the entire path rather than confined to ethical lapses
appamāda — diligence — the mirrored positive term, this discourse's own second chain
pāmojja…pīti…passaddhi — joy…rapture…tranquility — three consecutive links in the uphill chain, each a supporting condition for the next
samādhi — immersion — the chain's own penultimate link, the condition for principles becoming clear
dhammā — principles — the four noble truths, dependent origination, and the like, this chain's own final result in both directions

The text

The complete discourse: the downhill chain from unrestrained senses to unclear principles, and the identical chain reversed. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1“Mendicants, I will teach you who lives negligently and who lives diligently. Listen … And how does someone live negligently? When you live with the eye faculty unrestrained, your mind becomes polluted when it comes to sights known by the eye. When the mind is polluted, there’s no joy. When there’s no joy, there’s no rapture. When there’s no rapture, there’s no tranquility. When there’s no tranquility, there’s suffering. When one is suffering, the mind does not become immersed in samādhi. When the mind is not immersed in samādhi, principles do not become clear. Because principles have not become clear, you’re reckoned to live negligently. When you live with the ear … nose … tongue … body … mind faculty unrestrained, your mind becomes polluted when it comes to ideas known by the mind. When the mind is polluted, there’s no joy. When there’s no joy, there’s no rapture. When there’s no rapture, there’s no tranquility. When there’s no tranquility, there’s suffering. When one is suffering, the mind does not become immersed in samādhi. When the mind is not immersed in samādhi, principles do not become clear. Because principles have not become clear, you’re reckoned to live negligently. That’s how someone lives negligently.

§2And how does someone live diligently? When you live with the eye faculty restrained, your mind doesn’t become polluted when it comes to sights known by the eye. When the mind isn’t polluted, joy springs up. Being joyful, rapture springs up. When the mind is full of rapture, the body becomes tranquil. When the body is tranquil, one feels bliss. And when blissful, the mind becomes immersed in samādhi. When the mind is immersed in samādhi, principles become clear. Because principles have become clear, you’re reckoned to live diligently. When you live with the ear … nose … tongue … body … mind faculty restrained, your mind doesn’t become polluted when it comes to ideas known by the mind. When the mind isn’t polluted, joy springs up. Being joyful, rapture springs up. When the mind is full of rapture, the body becomes tranquil. When the body is tranquil, one feels bliss. And when blissful, the mind becomes immersed in samādhi. When the mind is immersed in samādhi, principles become clear. Because principles have become clear, you’re reckoned to live diligently. That’s how someone lives diligently.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

5 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 5
What is pamāda's own root meaning, per Sujato's note?
Correct: A. Usually an ethical term; here extended across the entire path.
Question 2 of 5
What is the first link in the downhill chain, following an unrestrained faculty?
Correct: A. Everything else in the seven-link chain follows from this.
Question 3 of 5
What is the chain's own final result, in both directions?
Correct: A. The four noble truths, dependent origination, and the like.
Question 4 of 5
What comes immediately before immersion in samādhi in the uphill chain?
Correct: A. Joy, rapture, bodily tranquility, bliss, then samādhi — each a condition for the next.
Question 5 of 5
What related discourse, already part of this project, links the uphill process to samādhi as a supporting condition?
Correct: A. Already translated in this project's own Book II (Nidānavagga).
Answered 0 of 5 · Correct 0