Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 4.18

Alms Food

Piṇḍasutta

Setting
In Magadhan territory, near the brahmin village of Pañcasālā
Speakers
The Buddha and Māra the Wicked
Form
A real social consequence — an empty alms bowl — followed by a taunting offer and a defiant, joyful verse
Length
~2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★★★☆ — the most materially consequential confrontation in this vagga, its resolution purely internal

Why this discourse

This discourse shows Māra's most direct interference yet in the physical world: rather than manifesting an illusion, he possesses the brahmins and householders of Pañcasālā themselves, ensuring the Buddha receives no alms at all on his morning round. Confronted afterward, Māra taunts him about the empty bowl, then offers, almost mockingly, to guarantee alms if the Buddha tries again — met not with anger but with a verse of undiminished contentment: living happily with nothing, feeding on rapture like the gods of streaming radiance.

Reading guide

Possession, not illusion: Māra's most direct intervention

Unlike every manifestation or claim elsewhere in this vagga, this discourse describes Māra actually possessing human beings — the villagers of Pañcasālā — to produce a real, material consequence: the Buddha's bowl returns from alms round completely empty.

A taunt that assumes triumph, then an offer that assumes control

Māra's question — ‘did you get any alms?’ — already knows the answer and savors it; his follow-up offer to ‘make sure’ alms are given on a second attempt compounds the provocation, presenting himself as controlling access to something as basic as food.

A direct accusation, unusually explicit

The Buddha's own opening line in reply — ‘Māra has produced wickedness in attacking the Realized One’ — names the act as wickedness outright, a more explicit moral accusation than this vagga's more common pattern of simply denying Māra's claims.

A warning about consequence, not merely a rebuke

‘Do you imagine that your wickedness won't bear fruit?’ introduces the logic of karmic consequence directly into the confrontation, suggesting Māra's interference carries its own cost regardless of whether it succeeds in its immediate aim.

Nothing to lose, and rapture instead of food

The verse's closing claim — living happily with nothing, feeding on rapture ‘like the gods of streaming radiance’ — answers the material deprivation directly but on entirely different terms, naming a sustenance Māra's control over alms-giving villagers has no power to withhold.

Key terms

Pañcasālā — “Pañcasālā” — the Magadhan brahmin village whose people Māra possesses to deny the Buddha alms.
piṇḍa — “alms food” — what the Buddha is denied, giving this discourse its title.
pāpaṁ — “wickedness” — the Buddha's own explicit term for Māra's act, more direct than this vagga's usual pattern of simple denial.
akiñcana — “having nothing” — the condition the verse describes living happily within, despite the empty bowl.
ābhassara — “the gods of streaming radiance” — the verse's image for beings said to feed on rapture alone, applied to the Buddha's own contentment.

The text

The discourse in full: the possession and empty bowl, Māra's taunting offer, and the defiant, joyful verse. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At one time the Buddha was staying in the land of the Magadhans near the brahmin village of Pañcasālā. Now at that time in Pañcasālā the young maidens were occupied with guests. Then the Buddha robed up in the morning and, taking his bowl and robe, entered Pañcasālā for alms. Now at that time Māra had possessed the brahmins and householders of Pañcasālā, so that they thought, “Don’t let the ascetic Gotama get any alms!”

§2Then the Buddha left the village with his bowl as clean-washed as it was when he entered for alms. Then Māra the Wicked went up to the Buddha and said to him, “Well, ascetic, did you get any alms?” “Wicked One, did you make sure I didn’t get any alms?” “Well then, sir, let the Buddha enter Pañcasālā a second time for alms. I’ll make sure you get alms.”

§3“Māra has produced wickedness in attacking the Realized One. Wicked One, do you imagine that your wickedness won’t bear fruit?

§4Let us live so very happily, we who have nothing. We shall feed on rapture, like the gods of streaming radiance.”

§5Then Māra the Wicked, thinking, “The Buddha knows me! The Holy One knows me!” miserable and sad, vanished right there.

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What does Māra do in this discourse, unlike his manifestations elsewhere in this vagga?
Correct: A. A real, material consequence rather than an illusion or manifestation.
Question 2 of 10
What is the result of this possession?
Correct: A. A genuine social and material consequence, not an illusion.
Question 3 of 10
What does Māra offer after the empty bowl?
Correct: A. A taunting offer that presents Māra as controlling access to something as basic as food.
Question 4 of 10
How does the Buddha's reply characterize Māra's act?
Correct: A. More explicit than this vagga's more common pattern of simply denying Māra's claims.
Question 5 of 10
What logic does the Buddha introduce with “do you imagine your wickedness won't bear fruit”?
Correct: A. Māra's interference carries its own cost regardless of its immediate success.
Question 6 of 10
How does the verse answer the material deprivation of the empty bowl?
Correct: A. A sustenance Māra's control over the villagers has no power to withhold.
Question 7 of 10
What condition does the verse say the Buddha lives happily within?
Correct: A. Contentment independent of material provision.
Question 8 of 10
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: A. The specific village whose people Māra possesses.
Question 9 of 10
How does this discourse's stakes compare to most others in this vagga?
Correct: A. The most materially consequential confrontation in this vagga, resolved entirely internally.
Question 10 of 10
What gods does the verse's closing image reference?
Correct: A. A specific class of deity said to feed on rapture alone, applied to the Buddha's own state.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0