Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 4.19

A Farmer

Kassakasutta

Setting
At Sāvatthī, during a Dhamma talk on extinguishment
Speakers
The Buddha and Māra the Wicked, disguised as a farmer
Form
An elaborate disguise, an escalating territorial claim over all six senses, and a matched, then surpassing, denial
Length
~3 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★★★☆ — the longest and most argumentatively developed exchange in this vagga so far

Why this discourse

This discourse gives Māra his most elaborate disguise yet: a farmer with a large plough, a long goad, messy hair, hemp clothing, and muddy feet, asking whether the Buddha has seen any oxen. When the Buddha turns the question back on him, Māra drops the pretense entirely and makes an extraordinary claim: the eye, sights, ear, sounds, and every other sense field, all six of them, belong to him alone, so where could the Buddha possibly escape? The Buddha's reply matches this claim structurally before surpassing it — conceding the senses as Māra's domain, then locating himself entirely outside where any of them exist at all.

Reading guide

A disguise this vagga's most detailed yet

The farmer's description — plough, goad, messy hair, hemp clothing, muddy feet — is unusually specific and mundane compared to this vagga's elephants, serpents, or oxen, a convincingly ordinary figure rather than something overtly supernatural or frightening.

A question that drops its own pretense

The Buddha's counter-question — ‘what have you to do with oxen, Wicked One?’ — doesn't merely expose the disguise; it prompts Māra to abandon the farmer pretense entirely and escalate straight into his real claim, as though the disguise had already served its purpose simply by getting close enough to speak.

Ownership claimed over all six senses, exhaustively

Māra's claim runs through every sense field in turn — eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, mind — each declared his alone, along with their objects and the consciousness arising from contact, an exhaustive territorial assertion rather than a single vague threat.

A reply that concedes before it transcends

Unlike this vagga's more common flat denials, the Buddha's answer initially agrees with Māra's claim entirely — yes, the eye and sights and eye-consciousness are indeed yours — before adding the decisive turn: where none of these exist at all, you have no place there, conceding the territory while stepping outside it.

A path Māra cannot even perceive, not merely cannot follow

The verse's final claim — ‘you won't even see the path I take’ — goes further than simple escape; it denies Māra even the perceptual access needed to track an attempt at escape, the strongest claim of separation offered anywhere in this vagga.

Key terms

kassaka — “farmer” — the disguise Māra adopts, giving this discourse its title.
cakkhu rūpā cakkhuviññāṇāyatana — “the eye, sights, the field of eye contact consciousness” — the formula repeated for each of the six senses in Māra's territorial claim.
mama — “mine” — the possessive claim Māra repeats across all six senses, exhaustively.
yattha natthi — “where there is no…” — the Buddha's structural pivot, conceding Māra's domain before locating himself entirely outside it.
na dakkhisi — “you won't even see” — the verse's final claim, denying Māra perceptual access to the Buddha's path at all.

The text

The discourse in full: the farmer's disguise, the escalating territorial claim, and the matched, surpassing denial. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At Sāvatthī. Now at that time the Buddha was educating, encouraging, firing up, and inspiring the mendicants with a Dhamma talk about extinguishment. And those mendicants were paying attention, applying the mind, concentrating wholeheartedly, and actively listening.

§2Then Māra thought, “The ascetic Gotama is giving a Dhamma talk about extinguishment … and the mendicants are listening well. Why don’t I go and pull the wool over their eyes?” Then Māra the Wicked manifested in the form of a farmer carrying a large plough on his shoulder. He held a long goad, his hair was messy, he was clad in sunn hemp, and his feet were muddy. He went up to the Buddha and said to him, “So, ascetic, did you happen to see any oxen?” “But what have you to do with oxen, Wicked One?” “Mine alone, ascetic, is the eye, mine are sights, mine is the field of eye contact consciousness. Where can you escape me, ascetic? Mine alone is the ear … nose … tongue … body … mind, mine are ideas, mine is the field of mind contact consciousness. Where can you escape me, ascetic?”

§3“Yours alone, Wicked One, is the eye, yours are sights, yours is the field of eye contact consciousness. Where there is no eye, no sights, no eye contact consciousness—you have no place there, Wicked One! Yours alone is the ear … nose … tongue … body … mind, yours are ideas, yours is the field of mind contact consciousness. Where there is no mind, no ideas, no mind contact consciousness—you have no place there, Wicked One!”

§4“The things they call ‘mine’, and those who say ‘it’s mine’: if your mind remains there, you won’t escape me, ascetic!”

§5“The things they speak of aren’t mine; I’m not someone who speaks like that. So know this, Wicked One: you won’t even see the path I take.”

§6Then Māra … vanished right there.

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What disguise does Māra adopt in this discourse?
Correct: A. This vagga's most detailed and convincingly mundane disguise so far.
Question 2 of 10
What does the Buddha's counter-question prompt Māra to do?
Correct: A. As though the disguise had already served its purpose by getting close enough to speak.
Question 3 of 10
What does Māra claim ownership over?
Correct: A. An exhaustive territorial assertion, not a single vague threat.
Question 4 of 10
How does the Buddha's reply differ from this vagga's more common flat denials?
Correct: A. Yes, the senses are yours — but where none of them exist, you have no place there.
Question 5 of 10
What is the verse's final claim about the path the Buddha takes?
Correct: A. Denying Māra even the perceptual access needed to track an attempt at escape.
Question 6 of 10
What was the Buddha teaching when this disguised encounter began?
Correct: A. The topic in progress when Māra's farmer disguise first appears.
Question 7 of 10
How many times does the sense-field formula repeat in Māra's claim?
Correct: A. Eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind, each claimed in turn.
Question 8 of 10
What does Māra say after the Buddha's first reply, before the final exchange?
Correct: A. A further attempt, pressing the point before the Buddha's final, decisive reply.
Question 9 of 10
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: A. The setting for this teaching and Māra's elaborate disguise.
Question 10 of 10
How does this discourse's argumentative development compare to most others in this vagga?
Correct: A. A multi-stage escalation distinct from this vagga's more typical single provocation and reply.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0