Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 4.20

Ruling

Rajjasutta

Setting
In Kosalan territory, in a wilderness hut on the slopes of the Himalayas
Speakers
The Buddha, in private reflection, and Māra the Wicked
Form
A private hypothetical overheard, an eager temptation toward power, and a verse rejecting wealth itself as ever sufficient
Length
~2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★★★☆ — the closing discourse of this vagga and one of this collection's most famous renunciation teachings

Why this discourse

This discourse closes the vagga that takes its name directly from it: alone in a wilderness hut, the Buddha privately wonders whether it might be possible to rule legitimately, without killing, conquering, or causing sorrow. Māra, reading this thought exactly as at SN 4.1, seizes on it eagerly — urging the Buddha toward kingship rather than away from it, and revealing he believes the Buddha's mastery of psychic power could turn the Himalayas themselves to gold. The Buddha's reply does not evaluate whether righteous rule is possible at all; it dismisses the entire premise of wealth as sufficient, however vast.

Reading guide

A private hypothetical, not a settled ambition

The Buddha's wondering is framed explicitly as a question — ‘I wonder if it's possible’ — not a decision or a desire, a nuance Māra's eager response does not respect, treating a tentative reflection as an opening to be exploited rather than a question still under consideration.

Temptation toward power, not away from the teaching

Unlike every other confrontation in this vagga, Māra here is not trying to stop a teaching, mock a posture, or claim territory; he is actively encouraging the Buddha toward an alternative path entirely — worldly rule — a temptation of ambition rather than an attack on an existing position.

A reason given, unusually, for the temptation

Where this vagga's other discourses simply present Māra's challenge, here he explains why he thinks kingship is achievable: the Buddha's own developed psychic powers, which Māra claims could transform the Himalaya, king of mountains, into solid gold at a mere act of will.

Not a debate about method, but about sufficiency

The Buddha's answering verse does not dispute whether righteous, non-violent rule is achievable, or whether he could indeed produce a golden mountain; it bypasses that question entirely to make a different claim: even a golden mountain doubled would still not be enough for a single person's desire.

A closing discourse naming the entire vagga

This discourse's title, Rajja (‘ruling’), gives the ‘2. Rule’ vagga its name, following the same closing-discourse naming pattern already observed across the Devaputtasaṃyutta, Kosalasaṃyutta, and this saṃyutta's own first vagga.

Key terms

rajja — “ruling, kingship” — the subject of the Buddha's private wondering, giving this discourse and its vagga their shared title.
iddhipāda — “bases for psychic power” — what Māra says the Buddha has developed, the stated reason for his belief that transforming a mountain to gold is achievable.
Himavā pabbatarājā — “the Himalaya, king of mountains” — what Māra claims could be turned to gold, the temptation's specific, extravagant scale.
na alameva ekassa — “not enough for one” — the verse's central claim, that even a doubled golden mountain would not satisfy a single person.
upadhi saṁyojana — “attachment…a chain” — the verse's closing identification of what should actually be trained away, redirecting the entire question from rule to renunciation.

The text

The discourse in full, with the closing uddāna left blank in the source and not quoted here. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At one time the Buddha was staying in the land of the Kosalans, in a wilderness hut on the slopes of the Himalayas. Then as he was in private retreat this thought came to his mind, “I wonder if it’s possible to rule legitimately, without killing or having someone kill for you; without conquering or having someone conquer for you; without sorrowing or causing sorrow?”

§2And then Māra the Wicked, knowing the Buddha’s train of thought, went up to him and said, “Rule, Blessed One! Rule, Holy One! Rule legitimately, without killing or having someone kill for you; without conquering or having someone conquer for you; without sorrowing or causing sorrow!” “But what do you see, Wicked One, that you say this to me?” “The Blessed One, sir, has developed and cultivated the four bases for psychic power, made them a vehicle and a basis, kept them up, consolidated them, and properly implemented them. If he wished, the Blessed One need only determine that the Himalaya, king of mountains, was gold, and it would turn into gold.”

§3“Take a golden mountain, entirely of native gold, and double it—it’s still not enough for one! Knowing this, live a moral life.

§4When a personage has seen where suffering comes from how could they incline towards sensual pleasures? Realizing that attachment is a chain in the world, a personage would train to remove it.”

§5Then Māra the Wicked, thinking, “The Buddha knows me! The Holy One knows me!” miserable and sad, vanished right there.

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What does the Buddha privately wonder in this discourse?
Correct: A. A tentative reflection, not a settled ambition, that Māra seizes on immediately.
Question 2 of 10
How does Māra's response differ from most of his tactics elsewhere in this vagga?
Correct: A. A temptation of ambition, urging the Buddha toward an alternative path entirely.
Question 3 of 10
What reason does Māra give for believing kingship is achievable?
Correct: A. An unusually explicit justification, compared to this vagga's more typical unexplained challenges.
Question 4 of 10
How does the Buddha's reply address Māra's temptation?
Correct: A. A claim about sufficiency, not about whether the golden mountain could actually be produced.
Question 5 of 10
What does the verse's closing lines redirect the question toward?
Correct: A. Renunciation rather than acquisition, however righteously framed.
Question 6 of 10
What vagga does this discourse close, and how does it get its name?
Correct: A. Following the same closing-discourse naming pattern seen across earlier saṃyuttas.
Question 7 of 10
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: A. A solitary setting matching the private nature of the Buddha's reflection.
Question 8 of 10
How does the Buddha initially respond to Māra's encouragement?
Correct: A. Probing Māra's reasoning before the verse's ultimate rejection of the premise.
Question 9 of 10
What is left untranslated at the very close of this discourse in the source?
Correct: A. Blank in the source, consistent with how such closings are handled elsewhere in this collection.
Question 10 of 10
What broader teaching does this discourse's famous verse express?
Correct: A. A renunciation teaching that bypasses the specific method to address sufficiency itself.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0