Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 42.6

With Asibandhaka's Son

Asibandhakaputtasutta — Gāmaṇivagga

Setting
Nāḷandā, Pāvārika's mango grove
Speakers
Asibandhaka's son, a chief, questioning the Buddha
Form
A question about religious ritual, answered with two paired similes
Length
~2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — two vivid, easy-to-follow similes carrying the whole argument

Why this discourse

This discourse introduces a new named chief, Asibandhaka's son, who will return across several more discourses in this saṃyutta. He asks whether the Buddha, like brahmin priests who claim to “lift up and send” the dead to heaven through ritual, can ensure the whole world's good rebirth. The Buddha answers with two paired similes: a crowd's prayers cannot make a sunken rock float, and cannot make sunken ghee or oil sink further — because rocks sink and oil floats by their own nature, regardless of what any crowd wishes. In the same way, a person's own past conduct, not any external ritual or supplication, determines where they are reborn.

Reading guide

A comparison to brahmanical ritual, not a private claim

The chief's own question is framed against an existing religious practice — priests who ritually “send” the dead to heaven — setting up a direct comparison to the Buddha's own claimed power rather than an abstract doctrinal question.

Two similes, one shared logic

A heavy rock sinks and stays sunk no matter how a crowd prays over it; ghee or oil rises and stays afloat no matter how a crowd begs it downward — both examples make the identical point that physical nature, not external supplication, determines outcome.

Conduct as the rock, or the ghee

The discourse maps the similes directly onto rebirth: a person of poor conduct sinks toward a bad rebirth regardless of a crowd's prayers for the opposite, and a person of good conduct rises toward a good rebirth regardless of a crowd wishing them ill — conduct itself, like a rock's weight or oil's buoyancy, is what actually determines the outcome.

Key terms

asibandhakaputto — “Asibandhaka's son” — this discourse's own chief, named for his father, appearing across several more discourses in this saṃyutta
uyyāpenti... saggaṁ okkāmenti — “lift up... send to heaven” — the brahmin priests' own claimed ritual power, the comparison this discourse's own question is built on
puthusilā... udakarahade — “a broad rock... in a deep lake” — the first simile, illustrating that a crowd's prayers cannot make a sunken rock float
sappi vā telaṁ vā — “ghee or oil” — the second simile's own substance, rising regardless of a crowd's prayers to sink it
kāyassa bhedā paraṁ maraṇā — “when their body breaks up, after death” — the standard rebirth-consequence phrase, applied identically to both good and bad conduct in this discourse's own two parallel cases

The text

The complete discourse. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At one time the Buddha was staying near Nāḷandā in Pāvārika’s mango grove. Then Asibandhaka’s son the chief went up to the Buddha, bowed, sat down to one side, and said to him: “Sir, there are western brahmins garlanded with aquatic flowers who carry pitchers, immerse themselves in water, and serve the sacred flame. When someone has passed away, oh! they lift them up, send them well, and convey them to heaven. But what about the Blessed One, the perfected one, the fully awakened Buddha: is he able to ensure that the whole world will be reborn in a good place, a heavenly realm when their body breaks up, after death?” “Well then, chief, I’ll ask you about this in return, and you can answer as you like. What do you think, chief? Take an individual who kills living creatures, steals, and commits sexual misconduct. They use speech that’s false, backbiting, harsh, or nonsensical. And they’re covetous, malicious, and have wrong view. A large crowd were to come together to offer up supplication and entreaty, circumambulating them with cupped palms and saying: ‘When this person’s body breaks up, after death, may they be reborn in a good place, a heavenly realm!’ What do you think, chief? Would that person be reborn in heaven because of their supplications?” “No, sir.” “Chief, suppose a person were to throw a broad rock into a deep lake. And a large crowd were to come together to offer up supplication and entreaty, circumambulating it with cupped palms, and saying: ‘Rise, good rock! Float, good rock! Float to shore, good rock!’ What do you think, chief? Would that broad rock rise up or float because of their supplications?” “No, sir.” “In the same way, take a person who kills living creatures, steals, and commits sexual misconduct. They use speech that’s false, backbiting, harsh, or nonsensical. And they’re covetous, malicious, and have wrong view. Even though a large crowd were to come together to offer up supplication and entreaty … when their body breaks up, after death, they’re reborn in a place of loss, a bad place, the underworld, hell. What do you think, chief? Take an individual who doesn’t kill living creatures, steal, or commit sexual misconduct. They don’t use speech that’s false, backbiting, harsh, or nonsensical. And they’re contented, kind-hearted, and have right view. And a large crowd were to come together to offer up supplication and entreaty, circumambulating them with cupped palms and saying: ‘When this person’s body breaks up, after death, may they be reborn in a place of loss, a bad place, the underworld, hell!’ What do you think, chief? Would that person be reborn in hell because of their supplications?” “No, sir.” “Chief, suppose a person were to sink a pot of ghee or oil into a deep lake and break it open. Its shards and chips would sink down, while the ghee or oil in it would rise up. And a large crowd were to come together to offer up supplication and entreaty, circumambulating it with cupped palms and saying: ‘Sink, good ghee or oil! Descend, good ghee or oil! Go down, good ghee or oil!’ What do you think, chief? Would that ghee or oil sink and descend because of their supplications?” “No, sir.” “In the same way, take an individual who doesn’t kill living creatures, steal, or commit sexual misconduct. They don’t use speech that’s false, backbiting, harsh, or nonsensical. And they’re contented, kind-hearted, and have right view. Even though a large crowd were to come together to offer up supplication and entreaty … when their body breaks up, after death, they’re reborn in a good place, a heavenly realm.” When he said this, Asibandhaka’s son the chief said to the Buddha, “Excellent, sir! … From this day forth, may the Buddha remember me as a lay follower who has gone for refuge for life.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

3 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 3
What does the chief compare the Buddha's own power to?
Correct: A. A direct comparison to an existing religious practice, not an abstract doctrinal question.
Question 2 of 3
What do the rock and ghee/oil similes both illustrate?
Correct: A. A rock sinks and oil floats regardless of what any crowd prays for.
Question 3 of 3
What does this discourse map the similes onto?
Correct: A. Conduct itself, like a rock's weight or oil's buoyancy, is what actually determines the outcome.
Answered 0 of 3 · Correct 0