Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 47.47

Bad Conduct

Duccaritasutta — Amatavagga

Setting
Not specified in the source
Speakers
An unnamed mendicant requesting brief guidance, and the Buddha, teaching him
Form
The same narrative shape as SN 47.46 — request, teaching, and the mendicant's own attainment — with a different ethical starting point named
Length
1-2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
No individual parallel confirmed by this project's own check
Difficulty
★★★☆☆ — worth reading alongside SN 47.46 to see what varies and what stays fixed

Why this discourse

This discourse repeats SN 47.46's own narrative shape — a mendicant requests brief guidance, the Buddha names an ethical “starting point of skillful qualities,” and the mendicant goes on to attain arahantship — but NAMES A DIFFERENT starting point: not restraint in the monastic code specifically, but giving up bad conduct of body, speech, and mind and developing good conduct in their place.

Reading guide

The same narrative shape as SN 47.46, a different starting point

Confirmed by direct reading, this discourse follows the IDENTICAL sequence as SN 47.46 — a mendicant's own request, the Buddha naming an ethical foundation, mindfulness meditation grounded on it, and the mendicant's own attainment — but this discourse names giving up bad conduct and developing good conduct of body, speech, and mind, rather than SN 47.46's own specific naming of restraint in the monastic code.

Body, speech, and mind -- three channels, not one rule set

The discourse's own threefold division — “kāyaduccaritaṁ... vacīduccaritaṁ... manoduccaritaṁ” (bad conduct of body, speech, and mind) — is confirmed by direct reading to describe ethical conduct across all three channels of action, a broader ethical framing than a single set of monastic rules.

The same closing formula, elided in the source itself

Confirmed by direct reading, the Pāli root itself marks its own final section with “…pe…” (an elision indicator), confirming the source text treats the remainder as identical to SN 47.46's own closing — growth in skillful qualities, and the mendicant's own attainment of arahantship.

Key terms

kāyaduccarita, vacīduccarita, manoduccarita — “bad conduct of body, speech, and mind” — this discourse's own title term and named starting point, given up in favor of good conduct
kāyasucarita, vacīsucarita, manosucarita — “good conduct of body, speech, and mind” — the positive counterpart developed in place of bad conduct
ādi kusalānaṁ dhammānaṁ — “the starting point of skillful qualities” — the same phrase used in SN 47.46, here answered with a different specific content
sīlaṁ nissāya sīle patiṭṭhāya — “depending on and grounded on ethics” — the identical phrase from SN 47.46, describing how mindfulness meditation should be developed
…pe… — the elision marker in the Pāli root itself, confirming the discourse's own closing section is treated as identical to SN 47.46's own

The text

The complete discourse. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1 — the request and the ethical starting pointThen a mendicant went up to the Buddha … and said: “Sir, may the Buddha please teach me Dhamma in brief. When I’ve heard it, I’ll live alone, withdrawn, diligent, keen, and resolute.” “Well then, mendicant, you should purify the starting point of skillful qualities. What is the beginning of skillful qualities? Give up bad conduct by way of body, speech, and mind and develop good conduct by way of body, speech, and mind. When you’ve done this, you should develop the four kinds of mindfulness meditation, depending on and grounded on ethics.

§2 — mindfulness meditation and the outcomeWhat four? Meditate observing an aspect of the body—keen, aware, and mindful, rid of covetousness and displeasure for the world. Meditate observing an aspect of feelings … mind … principles—keen, aware, and mindful, rid of covetousness and displeasure for the world. When you develop the four kinds of mindfulness meditation in this way, depending on and grounded on ethics, you can expect growth, not decline, in skillful qualities, whether by day or by night.” … And that mendicant became one of the perfected.

· · ·

Self-check quiz

3 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 3
How does this discourse's own narrative shape compare to SN 47.46?
Correct: A. A mendicant's own request, an ethical foundation, mindfulness meditation grounded on it, and the mendicant's own attainment — the same shape, different specific content.
Question 2 of 3
What ethical starting point does THIS discourse name, distinct from SN 47.46's own "restraint in the monastic code"?
Correct: A. A broader ethical framing across all three channels of action, rather than a single set of monastic rules.
Question 3 of 3
What does the elision marker "…pe…" in the Pāli root of this discourse's own closing section confirm?
Correct: A. Growth in skillful qualities, and the mendicant's own attainment of arahantship, exactly as in SN 47.46.
Answered 0 of 3 · Correct 0