Reading guide
Three feelings, one object of understanding
Confirmed by direct reading, this discourse's own opening names exactly three feelings — pleasant (sukhā), painful (dukkhā), and neutral (adukkhamasukhā) — the same threefold division of feeling used throughout the canon's own broader treatment of vedanā.
A different direction than SN 47.38's own claim
This project's own honest comparison confirms a genuine difference in logical direction: SN 47.38 stated that the four mindfulness OBJECTS (including feelings) come to be completely understood THROUGH the practice, leading to freedom from death; THIS discourse instead names the three feelings as the goal, and mindfulness meditation as the MEANS developed for reaching that goal — a purpose clause rather than an outcome clause.
"Should be developed" -- bhāvetabbā, a prescription
Confirmed by direct reading, the discourse's own verb “bhāvetabbā” (“should be developed”) frames the four kinds of mindfulness meditation as a PRESCRIBED practice undertaken specifically to reach complete understanding of the three feelings, rather than as an activity whose outcome is merely described.
Key terms
The text
§1“Mendicants, there are these three feelings. What three? Pleasant, painful, and neutral feeling. These are the three feelings. The four kinds of mindfulness meditation should be developed to completely understand these three feelings. What four? It’s when a mendicant meditates by observing an aspect of the body—keen, aware, and mindful, rid of covetousness and displeasure for the world. They meditate observing an aspect of feelings … mind … principles—keen, aware, and mindful, rid of covetousness and displeasure for the world. These four kinds of mindfulness meditation should be developed to completely understand these three feelings.”
Self-check quiz
3 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.