Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 48.38

Analysis (3rd)

Tatiyavibhaṅgasutta — Sukhindriyavagga

Setting
Not specified in the source
Speakers
The Buddha, addressing the mendicants directly
Form
The identical structure of SN 48.37, closing with one further explicit sentence
Length
1–2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
No individual parallel confirmed by this project's own check
Significance
★★★★☆ — completes a natural trilogy with SN 48.36-37, making explicit the reversible five-to-three, three-to-five relationship SN 48.37 only demonstrated

Why this discourse

This discourse completes a natural trilogy with this project's own SN 48.36 and SN 48.37: identical five faculty definitions, identical threefold consolidation, but closing with one further explicit sentence — “these five faculties, depending on how they're explained, having been five become three, and having been three become five” — naming outright the reversible relationship the previous two discourses only demonstrated.

Reading guide

Completing a trilogy: bare, consolidated, explained

This project's own observation across all three discourses: SN 48.36 gave the bare five definitions alone; SN 48.37 added the threefold consolidation without comment; this discourse adds the explicit closing statement naming the relationship between them — each discourse building one further step on the one before it, confirmed by direct comparison of all three texts.

A relationship named explicitly: pariyāyena

Confirmed by direct reading, this discourse's own closing sentence uses the word “pariyāyena” (“depending on how they're explained,” “by way of a specific teaching method”) to frame the five-faculty and three-feeling schemes not as two competing accounts but as the SAME five faculties, presented through two different explanatory methods — five when analyzed one way, three when consolidated another way.

A deliberate closing device for this vagga's own trilogy

This project's own honest observation: with this discourse's own explicit meta-statement, the Analysis-trilogy (SN 48.36-38) reads as a deliberately graduated teaching device — first stating the parts, then showing how they group, then naming the principle behind the grouping itself.

Key terms

Tatiyavibhaṅgasutta — “the third analysis discourse” — completing the trilogy begun at SN 48.36
pariyāyena — “depending on how they're explained,” “by way of a specific teaching method” — the key word framing the five-to-three relationship as a matter of presentation, not two separate realities
pañca hutvā tīṇi honti — “having been five, become three” — the first half of this discourse's own closing statement
tīṇi hutvā pañca honti — “having been three, become five” — the reverse direction, completing the reversible relationship
Aṭṭhamaṁ — “the eighth” — the closing colophon marker, confirming this as the vagga's eighth discourse, still without a vagga-closing formula

The text

The complete discourse. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1-6 — the five faculty definitions, identical to SN 48.36-37“Mendicants, there are these five faculties. What five? The faculties of pleasure, pain, happiness, sadness, and equanimity. And what is the faculty of pleasure? Physical enjoyment, physical pleasure, the enjoyable, pleasant feeling that’s born from physical contact. This is called the faculty of pleasure. And what is the faculty of pain? Physical pain, physical unpleasantness, the painful, unpleasant feeling that’s born from physical contact. This is called the faculty of pain. And what is the faculty of happiness? Mental enjoyment, mental pleasure, the enjoyable, pleasant feeling that’s born from mind contact. This is called the faculty of happiness. And what is the faculty of sadness? Mental pain, mental displeasure, the painful, unpleasant feeling that’s born from mind contact. This is called the faculty of sadness. And what is the faculty of equanimity? Neither pleasant nor unpleasant feeling, whether physical or mental. This is the faculty of equanimity.

§7 — the threefold consolidation and the closing meta-statementIn this context, the faculties of pleasure and happiness should be seen as pleasant feeling. The faculties of pain and sadness should be seen as painful feeling. The faculty of equanimity should be seen as neutral feeling. That’s how these five faculties, depending on how they’re explained, having been five become three, and having been three become five.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

3 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 3
How does this discourse complete the trilogy begun at SN 48.36?
Correct: A. Naming outright what SN 48.37 only demonstrated without comment.
Question 2 of 3
What does the word "pariyāyena" frame the five-faculty and three-feeling schemes as?
Correct: A. Five when analyzed one way, three when consolidated another way — the same faculties, different resolutions.
Question 3 of 3
How does this project's own reading guide characterize the Analysis trilogy (SN 48.36-38) as a whole?
Correct: A. Each discourse builds one further step on the one before it.
Answered 0 of 3 · Correct 0