Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 52.3

On the Bank of the Sutanu

Sutanusutta — Rahogatavagga

Setting
The bank of the Sutanu, near Sāvatthī
Speakers
Several mendicants and Venerable Anuruddha
Form
A direct question and a first-person answer, with a new closing claim
Length
~1 minute to read
Northern parallel
No individual parallel confirmed by this project's own check
Significance
★★★ — a new setting and occasion, adding a distinctive closing claim not found in either of the first two discourses of this vagga

Why this discourse

Confirmed by direct reading, this discourse moves away from SN 52.1-2's own shared “in private” scene entirely: it is set on the bank of the Sutanu, and a group of mendicants ask Anuruddha directly what he developed to attain “great direct knowledge” (mahābhiññā) — his answer names the same four kinds of mindfulness meditation, but adds a distinctive closing claim about directly knowing principles at three distinct levels.

Reading guide

A new setting, a direct question

Confirmed by direct reading, this discourse's own opening breaks from the pattern of SN 52.1-2: instead of Anuruddha's own private reflection interrupted by Moggallāna, several mendicants approach him directly on the bank of the Sutanu and ask what he developed to attain his own “great direct knowledge.”

The same plain formula as SN 52.2

This project's own comparison: Anuruddha's own answer here uses the same plainer, generic satipaṭṭhāna formula already met at SN 52.2 (“observing an aspect of...”), rather than SN 52.1's own fuller impermanence-observing version.

A distinctive new closing claim

Confirmed by direct reading, this discourse adds a closing statement not found in either SN 52.1 or SN 52.2: through developing the four kinds of mindfulness meditation, Anuruddha “directly knew the lower principle as lower, the middle principle as middle, and the higher principle as higher” — a threefold discernment of quality or level this vagga's own first two discourses did not name.

Key terms

mahābhiññā — “great direct knowledge” — the specific attainment the mendicants ask Anuruddha about, distinct from the general term used in SN 52.1-2's own accounts
cattāro satipaṭṭhānā — “the four kinds of mindfulness meditation” — Anuruddha's own answer, unchanged in name from the previous two discourses
hīnaṁ dhammaṁ hīnato — “the lower principle as lower” — the first of this discourse's own distinctive threefold closing claim
majjhimaṁ dhammaṁ majjhimato — “the middle principle as middle” — the second item in the same threefold claim
paṇītaṁ dhammaṁ paṇītato — “the higher principle as higher” — the third and final item, closing this discourse's own distinctive addition

The text

The complete discourse. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At one time Venerable Anuruddha was staying near Sāvatthī on the bank of the Sutanu. Then several mendicants went up to Venerable Anuruddha, and exchanged greetings with him. When the greetings and polite conversation were over, they sat down to one side, and said to him: “What things has Venerable Anuruddha developed and cultivated to attain great direct knowledge?”

§2“Reverends, I attained great direct knowledge by developing and cultivating the four kinds of mindfulness meditation. What four? I meditate observing an aspect of the body—keen, aware, and mindful, rid of covetousness and displeasure for the world. I meditate observing an aspect of feelings … mind … principles—keen, aware, and mindful, rid of covetousness and displeasure for the world. I attained great direct knowledge by developing and cultivating these four kinds of mindfulness meditation. And it was by developing and cultivating these four kinds of mindfulness meditation that I directly knew the lower principle as lower, the middle principle as middle, and the higher principle as higher.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

3 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 3
How does this discourse's own setting differ from SN 52.1-2?
Correct: A. Confirmed by direct reading: a genuinely new occasion, not the private-reflection scene of SN 52.1-2.
Question 2 of 3
What distinctive closing claim does this discourse add, not found in SN 52.1 or SN 52.2?
Correct: A. This discourse's own distinctive threefold addition, confirmed by direct comparison to the previous two discourses.
Question 3 of 3
Which formula does Anuruddha's own answer use here, according to this project's own comparison?
Correct: A. Confirmed by direct comparison: the plainer formula, matching SN 52.2 rather than SN 52.1.
Answered 0 of 3 · Correct 0