Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 54.10

With Kimbila

Kimilasutta — Ekadhammavagga

Setting
Kimbilā, the Freshwater Mangrove Wood
Speakers
The Buddha, Venerable Kimbila, and Venerable Ānanda
Form
A narrative opening (Kimbila's own threefold silence), then the formula with explicit reasoning, then a new closing simile
Length
3–4 minutes to read
Northern parallel
No individual parallel confirmed by this project's own check
Significance
★★★★★ — closes Vagga 1 at exactly ten discourses, confirmed by the vagga's own colophon and uddāna, with the saṃyutta's own most explicit tetrad-by-tetrad justification

Why this discourse

Confirmed by direct reading of the root Pali colophon (“Ekadhammavaggo paṭhamo”) and its own uddāna, this discourse closes Vagga 1 at exactly ten discourses, matching this project's own count precisely. It is also this vagga's own most explicit treatment of the formula: after Kimbila keeps silent three times when the Buddha asks him directly how the practice is developed, Ānanda intervenes and the Buddha teaches Ānanda instead, giving each tetrad with an explicit “why is that?” justification tying it to its own satipaṭṭhāna, and closing with a crossroads simile not met elsewhere in this book.

Reading guide

Kimbila's own silence, and Ānanda's own intervention

Confirmed by direct reading, when the Buddha asks Kimbila directly how mindfulness of breathing is developed, Kimbila says nothing — not once, but three times in succession. Only then does Ānanda step in: “now is the time…let the Buddha speak on immersion due to mindfulness of breathing. The mendicants will listen and remember it.” The Buddha then teaches Ānanda directly, without further comment on Kimbila's own silence.

Each tetrad, explicitly justified

Confirmed by direct reading, this is the only discourse in this vagga to give an explicit reason for each tetrad's own mapping onto a satipaṭṭhāna: the body tetrad, “because the breath is a certain aspect of the body”; the feeling tetrad, because “careful application of mind to the in-breaths and out-breaths is a certain aspect of feelings”; the mind tetrad, because “there is no development of immersion due to mindfulness of breathing for someone who is unmindful and lacks awareness”; and the principles tetrad, closing with the giving up of covetousness and displeasure “seen with wisdom.”

A new simile: sand at the crossroads

Confirmed by direct reading, this discourse closes with a simile not met elsewhere in this saṃyutta: a cart or chariot approaching from any of the four directions — east, west, north, or south — destroys a heap of sand at the crossroads just the same; likewise, meditating by observing any of the four satipaṭṭhānas equally destroys unskillful qualities, regardless of which one is used as the entry point.

An untranslated closing, reported honestly

This project's own direct comparison: the root Pali's own closing colophon (“Dasamaṁ. Ekadhammavaggo paṭhamo”) and its own ten-item uddāna (naming every discourse of this vagga by title, confirmed to match this project's own SN 54.1-10 exactly) are both left as empty strings in the consulted English source — genuinely untranslated, not merely omitted by this project.

Key terms

evaṁ vutte, āyasmā kimilo tuṇhī ahosi — “when he said this, Kimbila kept silent” — repeated three times, this discourse's own distinctive opening
etassa, bhagavā, kālo — “now is the time, Blessed One!” — Ānanda's own intervention, requesting the Buddha teach directly
kāyaññatarāhaṁ, ānanda, etaṁ vadāmi yadidaṁ—assāsapassāsaṁ — “because the breath is a certain aspect of the body, I say” — the explicit justification for mapping the first tetrad onto body-contemplation
nāhaṁ, ānanda, muṭṭhassatissa asampajānassa ānāpānassatisamādhibhāvanaṁ vadāmi — “there is no development of immersion due to mindfulness of breathing for someone who is unmindful and lacks awareness, I say” — the justification for the mind tetrad
catumahāpathe mahāpaṁsupuñjo — “a large heap of sand at the crossroads” — this discourse's own closing simile, unique to this vagga's own final page

The text

Every genuinely translated fragment given in the consulted English source, which itself leaves the closing colophon and uddāna untranslated. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1So I have heard. At one time the Buddha was staying near Kimbilā in the Freshwater Mangrove Wood. Then the Buddha said to Venerable Kimbila, “Kimbila, how is immersion due to mindfulness of breathing developed and cultivated so that it is very fruitful and beneficial?”

§2When he said this, Kimbila kept silent. For a second time … And for a third time, the Buddha said to him, “How is immersion due to mindfulness of breathing developed and cultivated so that it is very fruitful and beneficial?” And a second time and a third time Kimbila kept silent.

§3When he said this, Venerable Ānanda said to the Buddha, “Now is the time, Blessed One! Now is the time, Holy One! Let the Buddha speak on immersion due to mindfulness of breathing. The mendicants will listen and remember it.”

§4“Well then, Ānanda, listen and apply your mind well, I will speak.” “Yes, sir,” Ānanda replied. The Buddha said this: “Ānanda, how is immersion due to mindfulness of breathing developed and cultivated so that it is very fruitful and beneficial? It’s when a mendicant—gone to a wilderness, or to the root of a tree, or to an empty hut—sits down cross-legged, sets their body straight, and brings mindfulness to the present. Just mindful, they breathe in. Mindful, they breathe out. … They practice like this: ‘I’ll breathe in observing letting go.’ They practice like this: ‘I’ll breathe out observing letting go.’ That’s how immersion due to mindfulness of breathing, when developed and cultivated, is very fruitful and beneficial.

Body tetradThere’s a time when a mendicant is breathing in heavily, and they know: ‘I’m breathing in heavily.’ Breathing out heavily they know: ‘I’m breathing out heavily.’ When breathing in lightly they know: ‘I’m breathing in lightly.’ Breathing out lightly they know: ‘I’m breathing out lightly.’ They practice like this: ‘I’ll breathe in experiencing the whole body.’ They practice like this: ‘I’ll breathe out experiencing the whole body.’ They practice like this: ‘I’ll breathe in stilling the physical process.’ They practice like this: ‘I’ll breathe out stilling the physical process.’ At such a time a mendicant is meditating by observing an aspect of the body—keen, aware, and mindful, rid of covetousness and displeasure for the world. Why is that? Because the breath is a certain aspect of the body, I say. Therefore, at such a time a mendicant is meditating by observing an aspect of the body—keen, aware, and mindful, rid of covetousness and displeasure for the world.

Feeling tetradThere’s a time when a mendicant practices like this: ‘I’ll breathe in experiencing rapture.’ They practice like this: ‘I’ll breathe out experiencing rapture.’ They practice like this: ‘I’ll breathe in experiencing bliss.’ They practice like this: ‘I’ll breathe out experiencing bliss.’ They practice like this: ‘I’ll breathe in experiencing the the mental process.’ They practice like this: ‘I’ll breathe out experiencing the the mental process.’ They practice like this: ‘I’ll breathe in stilling the mental process.’ They practice like this: ‘I’ll breathe out stilling the mental process.’ At such a time a mendicant is meditating by observing an aspect of feelings—keen, aware, and mindful, rid of covetousness and displeasure for the world. Why is that? Because careful application of mind to the in-breaths and out-breaths is a certain aspect of feelings, I say. Therefore, at such a time a mendicant is meditating by observing an aspect of feelings—keen, aware, and mindful, rid of covetousness and displeasure for the world.

Mind tetradThere’s a time when a mendicant practices like this: ‘I’ll breathe in experiencing the mind.’ They practice like this: ‘I’ll breathe out experiencing the mind.’ They practice like this: ‘I’ll breathe in gladdening the mind.’ They practice like this: ‘I’ll breathe out gladdening the mind.’ They practice like this: ‘I’ll breathe in immersing the mind in samādhi.’ They practice like this: ‘I’ll breathe out immersing the mind in samādhi.’ They practice like this: ‘I’ll breathe in freeing the mind.’ They practice like this: ‘I’ll breathe out freeing the mind.’ At such a time a mendicant is meditating by observing an aspect of the mind—keen, aware, and mindful, rid of covetousness and displeasure for the world. Why is that? Because there is no development of immersion due to mindfulness of breathing for someone who is unmindful and lacks awareness, I say. Therefore, at such a time a mendicant is meditating by observing an aspect of the mind—keen, aware, and mindful, rid of covetousness and displeasure for the world.

Principles tetradThere’s a time when a mendicant practices like this: ‘I’ll breathe in observing impermanence.’ They practice like this: ‘I’ll breathe out observing impermanence.’ They practice like this: ‘I’ll breathe in observing fading away.’ They practice like this: ‘I’ll breathe out observing fading away.’ They practice like this: ‘I’ll breathe in observing cessation.’ They practice like this: ‘I’ll breathe out observing cessation.’ They practice like this: ‘I’ll breathe in observing letting go.’ They practice like this: ‘I’ll breathe out observing letting go.’ At such a time a mendicant is meditating by observing an aspect of principles—keen, aware, and mindful, rid of covetousness and displeasure for the world. Having seen with wisdom the giving up of covetousness and displeasure, they watch closely over with equanimity. Therefore, at such a time a mendicant is meditating by observing an aspect of principles—keen, aware, and mindful, rid of covetousness and displeasure for the world.

The crossroads simileSuppose there was a large heap of sand at the crossroads. And a cart or chariot were to come by from the east, west, north, or south and destroy that heap of sand. In the same way, when a mendicant is meditating by observing an aspect of the body, feelings, mind, or principles, they destroy bad, unskillful qualities.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

3 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 3
What happens when the Buddha first asks Kimbila directly how mindfulness of breathing is developed?
Correct: A. Confirmed by direct reading: threefold silence, then Ānanda's own intervention.
Question 2 of 3
What reason does the Buddha give for why the first tetrad maps onto body-contemplation?
Correct: A. Confirmed by direct reading — this discourse's own distinctive, explicit tetrad-by-tetrad justification.
Question 3 of 3
What does this project's own direct comparison confirm about this discourse's own closing colophon and uddāna?
Correct: A. Confirmed by direct comparison between the two sources, reported honestly rather than filled in.
Answered 0 of 3 · Correct 0