Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 56.32

Acacia Leaves

Khadirapattasutta — Sīsapāvanavagga

Setting
Not given — continuing directly from SN 56.31's own setting
Speaker
The Buddha, addressing the mendicants directly
Form
Two paired similes, impossibility then possibility, each illustrated by a leaf-basket example
Length
1–2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
No individual parallel confirmed by this project's own check
Significance
★★★★ — the second discourse of Vagga 4, this project's own first encounter with this vagga's own distinctive vivid similes

Why this discourse

Confirmed by direct reading, this discourse claims it is simply impossible to completely end suffering without truly comprehending the four noble truths — as impossible as weaving a basket from acacia, pine, or myrobalan leaves and using it to carry water — while ending suffering after truly comprehending the truths is as possible as carrying water in a basket woven from lotus, flame-of-the-forest, or camel's foot creeper leaves.

Reading guide

Two ordinary materials, two different outcomes

This project's own reading: the simile turns on an ordinary, observable fact any listener could confirm — some leaves are naturally too stiff or brittle to hold water regardless of skill in weaving, while others naturally can — making the impossibility claim vivid and checkable rather than abstract.

Key terms

anabhisamecca...sammā dukkhassantaṁ karissāmī — “without truly comprehending [the four truths]...I will completely make an end of suffering” — the claim this discourse declares impossible
khadirapattānaṁ vā saralapattānaṁ vā āmalakapattānaṁ vā puṭaṁ karitvā — “making a basket out of acacia leaves or pine needles or myrobalan leaves” — the impossible task illustrating the impossible claim
netaṁ ṭhānaṁ vijjati — “that is not possible” — this discourse's own repeated verdict on the first claim
padumapattānaṁ vā palāsapattānaṁ vā māluvapattānaṁ vā — “lotus leaves or flame-of-the-forest leaves or camel's foot creeper leaves” — the materials illustrating the possible task, matching the possible claim
ṭhānametaṁ vijjati — “that is possible” — this discourse's own repeated verdict on the second claim

The text

Every genuinely translated fragment given in the consulted English source. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1“Mendicants, suppose someone were to say: ‘Without truly comprehending the noble truths of suffering, its origin, its cessation, and the path, I will completely make an end of suffering.’ That is not possible.

§2It’s as if someone were to say: ‘I’ll make a basket out of acacia leaves or pine needles or myrobalan leaves, and use it to carry water or ripe palmyra fruit.’ That is not possible. In the same way, suppose someone were to say: ‘Without truly comprehending the noble truths of suffering, its origin, its cessation, and the path, I will completely make an end of suffering.’ That is not possible.

§3But suppose someone were to say: ‘After truly comprehending the noble truths of suffering, its origin, its cessation, and the path, I will completely make an end of suffering.’ That is possible.

§4It’s as if someone were to say: ‘I’ll make a basket out of lotus leaves or flame-of-the-forest leaves or camel’s foot creeper leaves, and use it to carry water or ripe palmyra fruit.’ That is possible. In the same way, suppose someone were to say: ‘After truly comprehending the noble truths of suffering, its origin, its cessation, and the path, I will completely make an end of suffering.’ That is possible.

§5That’s why you should practice meditation …”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

3 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 3
What does this discourse claim is as impossible as weaving a basket from acacia or pine leaves to carry water?
Correct: A. Confirmed by direct reading — the discourse's own explicit impossibility claim, illustrated by the leaf-basket simile.
Question 2 of 3
What makes the acacia-leaf basket simile effective, per this project's own reading?
Correct: A. This project's own reading of the simile's own vivid, observable grounding.
Question 3 of 3
What leaves does this discourse name as capable of holding water, matching the possible claim?
Correct: A. Confirmed by direct reading — a distinct, naturally water-holding set of materials.
Answered 0 of 3 · Correct 0