Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 56.47

A Yoke With a Hole (1st)

Paṭhamachiggaḷayugasutta — Papātavagga

Setting
Not given — continuing directly from SN 56.46's own setting
Speaker
The Buddha, addressing the mendicants directly
Form
A single extended simile, its own application, then the standard closing instruction
Length
1–2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
No individual parallel confirmed by this project's own check
Significance
★★★★★ — the seventh of ten discourses, one of this project's own most widely recognized single images in the entire canon

Why this discourse

Confirmed by direct reading, this discourse gives the famous blind-turtle simile in its own first form: a yoke with a single hole thrown into the ocean, and a one-eyed turtle surfacing once every hundred years — the Buddha claims that turtle would sooner poke its neck through that yoke's own hole than a fool, once fallen to the underworld, would be reborn as a human being, because there is no principled conduct there at all, only preying on the weak.

Reading guide

A recognized image, this project's own first encounter

This project's own reading: this simile is among the canon's own most widely recognized single images, traditionally cited to illustrate the rarity of human rebirth and, by extension, the rarity of any opportunity to encounter the Dhamma at all — here presented in its own more modest, ocean-scale form, with SN 56.48 escalating it further.

The stated reason: no possibility of ethical conduct

This project's own reading: the discourse's own explanation for the underworld's own severity is not merely suffering's own intensity, but the total absence of any principled or moral conduct there — beings there simply prey on each other, preying especially on the weak, with no possibility of the good and skillful action that might otherwise lead upward.

Key terms

mahāsamudde ekacchiggaḷaṁ yugaṁ pakkhipeyya — “throw a yoke with a single hole into the ocean” — this discourse's own central image
kāṇo kacchapo...vassasatassa vassasatassa accayena sakiṁ sakiṁ ummujjeyya — “a one-eyed turtle who popped up once every hundred years” — the simile's own second element
na tveva...sakiṁ vinipātagatena bālena manussattaṁ vadāmi — “[sooner than] a fool fallen to the underworld is reborn as a human being, I say” — this discourse's own comparative claim
na hettha atthi dhammacariyā, samacariyā, kusalakiriyā, puññakiriyā — “in that place there's no principled or moral conduct, and no doing what is good and skillful” — the discourse's own stated reason for the underworld's own severity
aññamaññakhādikā...dubbalakhādikā — “they just prey on each other, preying on the weak” — the underworld's own described condition

The text

Every genuinely translated fragment given in the consulted English source. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1“Mendicants, suppose a person were to throw a yoke with a single hole into the ocean. And there was a one-eyed turtle who popped up once every hundred years. What do you think, mendicants? Would that one-eyed turtle, popping up once every hundred years, still poke its neck through the hole in that yoke?” “Only after a very long time, sir, if ever.”

§2“That one-eyed turtle might poke its neck through the hole in that yoke, but in any case it’d be sooner than a fool fallen to the underworld is reborn as a human being, I say.

§3Why is that? Because in that place there’s no principled or moral conduct, and no doing what is good and skillful. There they just prey on each other, preying on the weak. Why is that? It’s because they haven’t seen the four noble truths. What four? The noble truths of suffering, its origin, its cessation, and the path.

§4That’s why you should practice meditation …”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

3 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 3
What does this discourse's own blind-turtle simile compare to a fool's own rebirth as a human being after falling to the underworld?
Correct: A. Confirmed by direct reading — an image of extreme, though not absolute, rarity.
Question 2 of 3
What does this discourse name as the reason the underworld is so severe?
Correct: A. Confirmed by direct reading — the discourse's own explicitly stated reason, an ethical rather than merely physical description.
Question 3 of 3
How does this project characterize this simile's own place in the wider canon?
Correct: A. This project's own contextual note on the simile's own broader recognition.
Answered 0 of 3 · Correct 0