Udāna · Ud 6.6

Followers of Various Other Religions (3rd)

Tatiyanānātitthiyasutta

Setting
Near Sāvatthī, Jeta’s Grove, Anāthapiṇḍika’s monastery — same as Ud 6.4 and 6.5
Speakers
The Buddha, addressing mendicants
Form
The same frame and the same sixteen views as Ud 6.5, closing with a longer, three-stanza verse
Length
~4 minutes to read
Note
Third and final sutta of the Ud 6.4–6.6 triad
Difficulty
★★★☆☆ — the doctrinal payoff of the triad, in dense verse

Why this heartfelt saying

The third and final sutta in this triad repeats the same sixteen speculative views word for word — and then, instead of the elephant image or the crossing image of the first two, closes with the most developed verse of the three: an account of the “I-maker” and the “other-maker,” an unseen dart, and the conceit that keeps its victims from escaping the cycle of rebirth.

Reading guide

The same city, the same sixteen views

This sutta opens exactly as Ud 6.5 does — the same wanderers, the same city, and, point for point, the identical sixteen-view list: eight positions on the eternity and origin of “the self and the cosmos,” then the same eight positions repeated with “pleasure and pain” folded in. The full breakdown of that sixteenfold list is given at Ud 6.5; this reading guide won’t repeat it, and turns instead to what makes this third sutta distinct — its verse.

The I-maker and the other-maker

Where Ud 6.4 closed on an image (the elephant) and Ud 6.5 closed on a metaphor (foundering mid-stream), Ud 6.6 closes with something closer to direct diagnosis: “Folk are fixated on the I-maker, which is tied up with the other-maker.” The Pali names both terms outright — ahaṅkāra, “I-maker,” and paraṅkāra, “other-maker” — and the pairing is doing real work: the verse’s logic seems to be that the very act of positing an “I” automatically manufactures its counterpart, an “other,” and every one of the sixteen views just catalogued — every claim that something is self-made or other-made, mine or not mine — already presupposes this more basic split.

The dart

Those who don’t see this, the verse says, “do not see the dart.” The image of a dart or arrow recurs elsewhere in the canon for what wounds or afflicts unseen, and the verse doesn’t pin down a single fixed referent here — but its placement is suggestive: immediately after naming the I-maker and the other-maker, and immediately before describing what changes once the dart is seen: “when they see this dart, they do not think, ‘I make it,’ nor ‘another makes it.’” Seeing clearly, on this reading, doesn’t settle the dispute in favor of one of the sixteen views — it dissolves the self/other framing that produced all sixteen of them in the first place.

Caught up in conceit

The closing stanza makes the strongest claim of the whole triad: “These folk are caught up in conceit, tied by conceit, shackled by conceit. Vehemently defending their views, they don’t escape transmigration.” What began, across three suttas, as a satirical scene of quarreling ascetics ends here in a serious doctrinal claim: clinging to any of these sixteen positions is bound up with māna, conceit, and that binding is precisely what keeps someone circling in saṁsāra rather than escaping it. Of the three closing verses in this triad, this is the one that states its consequence most directly.

Key terms

ahaṅkāra — “I-maker” — named directly in the Pali verse (ahaṅkārapasutā), the self-constructing act the closing verse identifies as the root of the dispute.
paraṅkāra — “other-maker” — named alongside ahaṅkāra in the same line, its necessary counterpart: once an “I” is constructed, an “other” is too.
salla — “the dart” — an image, used elsewhere in the canon for what pierces or afflicts, for what those still caught in view-making fail to see.
māna — “conceit,” named three times over in the closing stanza as what binds and shackles the disputants: “caught up in conceit, tied by conceit, shackled by conceit.”
saṁsāra — “transmigration,” the cycle of rebirth the verse says view-clinging prevents anyone from escaping.

The text

The discourse in full: the same frame and sixteen-view list as Ud 6.5, followed here by the triad’s longest and most developed verse. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1So I have heard. At one time the Buddha was staying near Sāvatthī in Jeta’s Grove, Anāthapiṇḍika’s monastery. Now at that time several ascetics, brahmins, and wanderers who followed various other religions were residing in Sāvatthī, holding different views, beliefs, and opinions, relying on different views.

§2There were some ascetics and brahmins who had this doctrine and view: “The self and the cosmos are eternal. This is the only truth, anything else is futile.”

The first eight views

§3–9Others held views such as the following, each regarding their own view as true and others as silly:

  • “The self and the cosmos are not eternal.”
  • “The self and the cosmos are both eternal and not eternal.”
  • “The self and the cosmos are neither eternal nor not eternal.”
  • “The self and the cosmos are made by oneself.”
  • “The self and the cosmos are made by another.”
  • “The self and the cosmos are made by both oneself and another.”
  • “The self and the cosmos have arisen anomalously, not made by oneself or another.”

The second eight views

§10–17The same eightfold pattern was repeated once more, now with pleasure and pain folded in alongside the self and the cosmos:

  • “Pleasure and pain are eternal, and the self and the cosmos.”
  • “Pleasure and pain are not eternal, and the self and the cosmos.”
  • “Pleasure and pain are both eternal and not eternal, and the self and the cosmos.”
  • “Pleasure and pain are neither eternal nor not eternal, and the self and the cosmos.”
  • “Pleasure and pain are made by oneself, and the self and the cosmos.”
  • “Pleasure and pain are made by another, and the self and the cosmos.”
  • “Pleasure and pain are made by both oneself and another, and the self and the cosmos.”
  • “Pleasure and pain have arisen anomalously, not made by oneself or another, and the self and the cosmos.”

§18They were fighting, quarreling, and disputing, continually wounding each other with barbed words: “Such is Truth, such is not Truth! Such is not Truth, such is Truth!”

§19Then several mendicants robed up in the morning and, taking their bowls and robes, entered Sāvatthī for alms. Then, after the meal, when they returned from almsround, they went up to the Buddha, bowed, sat down to one side, and told him what was happening.

A note on the text. As in Ud 6.5, the parable of the blind men and the elephant, given in full at Ud 6.4, is not repeated here in the source text as preserved. It moves directly to the heartfelt saying below.

§23Then, understanding this matter, on that occasion the Buddha expressed this heartfelt sentiment:

§24“Folk are fixated on the I-maker, which is tied up with the other-maker. There are some who do not realize this, they do not see the dart.

§25But when they see this dart, they do not think, ‘I make it’, nor ‘another makes it’.

§26These folk are caught up in conceit, tied by conceit, shackled by conceit. Vehemently defending their views, they don’t escape transmigration.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
How does the list of views in this sutta compare to Ud 6.5?
Correct: C. Ud 6.5 and Ud 6.6 share the same frame story and the same sixteenfold catalogue of views.
Question 2 of 10
What does this sutta close with, in place of Ud 6.4’s elephant image or Ud 6.5’s crossing image?
Correct: A. This is the most developed and doctrinally direct of the triad’s three closing verses.
Question 3 of 10
What two Pali terms does the reading guide identify in the verse’s opening line?
Correct: D. The verse names both terms directly: “folk are fixated on the I-maker, which is tied up with the other-maker.”
Question 4 of 10
What do those who don’t realize the I-maker/other-maker connection fail to see, according to the verse?
Correct: B. “There are some who do not realize this, they do not see the dart.”
Question 5 of 10
What happens, according to the verse, once someone does see the dart?
Correct: C. Seeing the dart dissolves the self/other framing rather than settling on one of the sixteen views.
Question 6 of 10
How many times does the closing stanza name “conceit” (māna)?
Correct: A. The repetition emphasizes how thoroughly conceit is said to bind the disputants.
Question 7 of 10
What does the closing stanza say clinging to views prevents?
Correct: D. “Vehemently defending their views, they don’t escape transmigration.”
Question 8 of 10
How does the reading guide describe the overall arc of the Ud 6.4–6.6 triad?
Correct: B. Ud 6.4 tells a vivid parable; Ud 6.6 ends with the triad’s most direct doctrinal statement.
Question 9 of 10
Is the elephant parable repeated in full in this sutta?
Correct: C. The same textual gap noted at Ud 6.5 recurs here.
Question 10 of 10
What is the ordinal position of this sutta within its triad?
Correct: A. Its Pali title, Tatiyanānātitthiyasutta, literally means the “third” sutta on followers of various other religions.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0