Part 117 · 決擇分中得品第三之二 · Complete

Why Bodhisattvas Are Never Formally Named Stream-Enterers

A bodhisattva who has already entered the certainty of correctness, transcending the ordinary condition of rebirth, has directly realized the very same truths a stream-enterer realizes — yet is never, strictly speaking, actually called a stream-enterer, a once-returner, or a non-returner. The treatise explains why, and how a bodhisattva's own remaining affliction, though genuinely still present, is rendered as harmless as poison already neutralized by a spell.

Translator: Ru-Yi Meditation Center Status: Part 117 complete Source: Taishō T1605, 大乘阿毘達磨集論卷第七, 決擇分中得品第三之二 Commentary guide: Sthiramati/Jinaputra's 大乘阿毘達磨雜集論 (T1606)
← Part 116 — Inexhaustible Bodhisattvas, and Fourteen Undetermined Questions

1. Why Not Stream-Enterer, Once-Returner, or Non-Returner

Chinese Source

何緣菩薩已入菩薩超昇離生位,而非預流耶?由得不住道,一向預流行不成就故。何緣亦非一來耶?故受諸有無量生故。何緣亦非不還耶?安住靜慮還生欲界故。

Ru-Yi Translation

Why is it that a bodhisattva who has already entered the bodhisattva ground that transcends the ordinary condition of rebirth is nevertheless not called a stream-enterer? Because such a bodhisattva has attained the path of non-abiding, and so does not fully carry out the exclusive, single-minded conduct proper to a stream-enterer as such.

Why is such a bodhisattva likewise not called a once-returner? Because such a bodhisattva deliberately takes on immeasurable further existences.

Why is such a bodhisattva likewise not called a non-returner? Because, even while abiding in dhyāna, such a bodhisattva still returns to be reborn in the desire realm.

Reading note — after T1606

T1606 explains that each of these three labels carries a specific, narrow implication the bodhisattva's own path deliberately does not fit. A stream-enterer, by definition, follows a single-minded, exclusive trajectory oriented toward that vehicle's own final release — but a bodhisattva has instead attained the non-abiding path already examined throughout this treatise's account of the Mahāyāna, remaining fully engaged with saṃsāra rather than moving exclusively toward personal exit from it, and so the term simply does not apply, even though the underlying direct realization is genuinely shared. A once-returner is defined by the specific limitation of taking, at most, one further rebirth in the desire realm before final release — but a bodhisattva deliberately takes on countless further existences, precisely in order to continue benefiting beings, and so exceeds this limitation entirely rather than falling short of it. And a non-returner is defined by having permanently left the desire realm behind, remaining always at or above the level of dhyāna — but a bodhisattva who has already mastered dhyāna and could remain there instead deliberately returns to the desire realm again and again, exactly as already examined in Part 93's account of the bodhisattva of the desire and form realms, since the desire realm is where beings still most need direct guidance.

2. Affliction Subdued Like Poison Neutralized by a Spell

Chinese Source

又諸菩薩已得諦現觀,於十地修道位唯修所知障對治道,非煩惱障對治道。若得菩提時,頓斷煩惱障及所知障,頓成阿羅漢及如來。此諸菩薩雖未永斷一切煩惱,然此煩惱猶如呪藥所伏諸毒,不起一切煩惱過失,一切地中如阿羅漢已斷煩惱。

Ru-Yi Translation

Further, bodhisattvas who have already attained direct realization of the truths, throughout the path of cultivation across the ten grounds, cultivate specifically the path that counteracts the cognitive obstruction, not the path that counteracts the afflictive obstruction. Only upon attaining awakening itself do they permanently sever both the afflictive obstruction and the cognitive obstruction all at once, becoming, in that same instant, both an arhat and a Tathāgata together.

Although these bodhisattvas have not yet permanently severed every affliction, that remaining affliction is exactly like a poison already subdued by a spell or an antidote: it gives rise to none of the actual faults affliction would otherwise produce. Throughout every one of the ten grounds, such a bodhisattva is, in this practical sense, already exactly like an arhat who has severed affliction.

Reading note — after T1606

T1606 explains the underlying logic here: a bodhisattva's own path of cultivation across the ten grounds is dedicated specifically to overcoming the cognitive obstruction — the subtle obscuration to complete knowledge that even a liberated arhat has not yet removed — because the afflictive obstruction, though not yet formally and permanently severed, has already been rendered functionally inert by that same bodhisattva's advanced realization. It is precisely this image — a genuinely dangerous poison, still present in substance, but rendered entirely harmless by a counteracting spell — that explains how a bodhisattva can, in every practical respect, already conduct themselves exactly like an arhat throughout the ten grounds, all the while formally retaining, rather than yet severing, the very affliction an arhat has already permanently removed. Both obstructions are then severed together, in a single decisive stroke, at the very moment of complete awakening itself — the same moment that makes a bodhisattva, in that instant, both an arhat and a Tathāgata at once.

Part 117 Complete

Why bodhisattvas are never formally named stream-enterers, once-returners, or non-returners, and how their remaining affliction is rendered harmless, are now examined. Part 118 turns to the five kinds of skill a bodhisattva must cultivate — in the object of knowledge, in skillful means, in false discrimination, in non-discrimination, and in sharpening one's own faculties — beginning with the six-fold analysis of the object of knowledge itself.

Continue to Part 118 — Five Kinds of Bodhisattva Skill Begin →