Part 124 · 決擇分中論議品第四 · Complete

Fourteen Approaches to Interpreting Scripture

The second of the seven kinds of determination through discourse: six elements every scriptural passage unpacks into, and fourteen distinct interpretive lenses a commentator can bring to a text — from why a teaching was given in the first place, through how it corrects specific misunderstandings, to how a single terse phrase can open into boundless further meaning.

Translator: Ru-Yi Meditation Center Status: Part 124 complete Source: Taishō T1605, 大乘阿毘達磨集論卷第七, 決擇分中論議品第四 Commentary guide: Sthiramati/Jinaputra's 大乘阿毘達磨雜集論 (T1606)
← Part 123 — 論議品 Begins: The Six Meanings

1. Determination of Explanation: Six Elements

Chinese Source

何等釋決擇?謂能解釋諸經宗要。此復云何?略有六種:一所遍知事、二所遍知義、三遍知因緣、四遍知自性、五遍知果、六彼證受。

Ru-Yi Translation

What is determination of explanation? It is what is able to explain the essential import of the scriptures. What, further, is this? In brief, there are six elements: the matter to be thoroughly known, the meaning to be thoroughly known, the cause and condition of thorough knowing, the essential nature of thorough knowing, the fruit of thorough knowing, and the direct experience of that fruit.

Reading note — after T1606

T1606 illustrates each element concretely: the matter to be thoroughly known is the aggregates and the like; the meaning to be thoroughly known is impermanence and the other such characteristics; the cause and condition of thorough knowing is pure moral discipline, guarding the sense faculties, and similar supporting conditions; the essential nature of thorough knowing is the factors of awakening already examined at length earlier in this treatise; the fruit of thorough knowing is liberation itself; and the direct experience of that fruit is the very knowledge and vision of having been liberated. Any scriptural passage, T1606 notes, can be unpacked by identifying which of these six elements it is actually addressing at a given point.

2. Fourteen Interpretive Approaches

Chinese Source

又十四門辯釋決擇。何等十四?謂攝釋門、攝事門、總別分門、後後開引門、遮止門、轉變字門、壞不壞門、安立補特伽羅門、安立差別門、理趣門、遍知等門、力無力門、別別引門、引發門。

Ru-Yi Translation

Explanation is, further, determined through fourteen interpretive approaches. What are the fourteen? The approach of gathering the explanation, the approach of gathering the matter, the approach of general and particular division, the approach of successive unfolding, the approach of exclusion, the approach of transformed wording, the approach of loss and non-loss, the approach of establishing the person, the approach of establishing distinctions, the approach of underlying principle, the approach of thorough knowing and the rest, the approach of capacity and incapacity, the approach of distinct citation, and the approach of unfolding extension.

Reading note — after T1606

T1606 illustrates each of the fourteen with a worked scriptural example. In brief outline:

  • Gathering the explanation traces why a given scripture was actually taught, what its terms mean, in what order, and with what underlying intention — resolving difficulties directly.
  • Gathering the matter reads a passage specifically through the lens of the three trainings or the four noble truths — as when "avoid all evil, do all good, purify the mind" is read as discipline, wisdom, and concentration in turn.
  • General and particular division notices when a scripture states a single summary line first and then unpacks it clause by clause afterward.
  • Successive unfolding notices when a scripture presents items in a fixed sequence because each genuinely depends on the one before it — as with the five faculties of faith, diligence, recollection, concentration, and wisdom, already examined in Part 61, each the necessary basis for the next.
  • Exclusion identifies which specific misunderstanding a given passage is meant to rule out — as when the Parable of the Raft Sūtra addresses four distinct kinds of listener each prone to a different mistake.
  • Transformed wording identifies deliberately cryptic language whose surface meaning conceals its actual intent, exactly as already examined in Part 81's account of the four hidden implications.
  • Loss and non-loss distinguishes what genuinely constitutes spiritual loss from what does not, and the specific means by which each comes about.
  • Establishing the person notices when a scripture's own distinctions are framed around a specific number or kind of person, as the Water Simile Sūtra sorts practitioners by degree of attainment.
  • Establishing distinctions works through a question via the classical fourfold logical schema — this but not that, that but not this, both, or neither.
  • Underlying principle reads a passage through six principles at once: genuine meaning, actual realization, instruction, freedom from the two extremes, the inconceivable, and underlying intention — as when the Sūtra on the Taste of Things is shown to address several of these together.
  • Thorough knowing and the rest maps a passage onto the fuller structure already introduced above — the true characteristic to be known, the fact of knowing it, its severance, its realization, and its cultivation — together with each one's own further subdivisions.
  • Capacity and incapacity notices when every single clause of a passage is doing genuine, irreplaceable work — as in the classical formula of dependent origination, where omitting even one link would leave the whole chain unintelligible.
  • Distinct citation notices when a single opening line is followed by an extensive, itemized unpacking — as when a monk possessing six specific skills is said to be able to shatter even Mount Sumeru, and each of the six is then explained in turn.
  • Unfolding extension notices when a single teaching's four component parts each themselves unfold into four further parts, and so on — a structure capable of extending indefinitely, each new layer drawing out further implications from the one before it.

Together, these fourteen give a working interpreter fourteen distinct questions to bring to any scriptural passage — not a rigid checklist to apply every time, but a repertoire of lenses, any one of which might be the key that unlocks a given text's own underlying structure.

Part 124 Complete

Determination of explanation, through its six elements and fourteen interpretive approaches, is now examined. Part 125 turns to determination through differentiated exposition — the treatise's own formal method for answering questions with a direct affirmation, a direct denial, or one of two, three, or four possible qualified answers — together with two shorter kinds of determination: through disputation and through inclusion.

Continue to Part 125 — Differentiated Exposition, Disputation, and Inclusion →