Part 130 · 決擇分中論議品第四 · Complete

Determination Through Hidden Meaning

The seventh and final kind of determination through discourse turns to scripture's own most deliberately provocative language: verses that speak of killing one's parents, of ingratitude and eating what others have vomited, each using shocking, transgressive-sounding words to conceal — and thereby vividly convey — a precise teaching on what liberation actually requires.

Translator: Ru-Yi Meditation Center Status: Part 130 complete Source: Taishō T1605, 大乘阿毘達磨集論卷第七, 決擇分中論議品第四 Commentary guide: Sthiramati/Jinaputra's 大乘阿毘達磨雜集論 (T1606)
← Part 129 — Withdrawing from Debate, and the Twelve Rare Conditions

1. What Determination Through Hidden Meaning Is

Chinese Source

何等祕密決擇?謂說餘義名句文身,隱密轉變更顯餘義。

Ru-Yi Translation

What is determination through hidden meaning? It is this: a collection of names, phrases, and syllables that appears to state one meaning is, through deliberate concealment, transformed to reveal an entirely different, further meaning.

2. The First Verse: Killing One's Parents

Chinese Source

如經言:「逆害於父母,王及二多聞,誅國及隨行,是人說清淨。」

Ru-Yi Translation

As the scripture states: "One who kills father and mother, the king, and the two learned ones, who slays the realm and its retinue — this person is said to be pure."

Reading note — after T1606

T1606 explains this verse as concealing a precise teaching on the deep mechanism of continued rebirth, mapped element by element onto its shocking surface language. Craving is the "father," since it is craving that actively drives one onward into a new existence, generating the process the way a father generates offspring. Karma is the "mother," since it is karma that actually gives birth to that new existence, nurturing it into being the way a mother carries a child. Together these two plant habitual seeds that keep the appropriating consciousness — the very consciousness that clings to and takes up a new existence — flowing on without interruption. Attachment to rules and rituals, and attachment to views, are the "two learned ones," since these are what a being caught in this flow mistakenly reveres as the very source of purity, exactly as the world reveres its own learned brahmins. And the appropriating consciousness's own supporting sense fields — the very "realm and its retinue" it depends on and takes as its object — are what must, together with everything already named, be permanently severed. One who has genuinely and permanently cut off every one of these — craving, karma, the two false refuges, and the very sense fields that sustain continued rebirth — is the one this verse truly calls pure, not a literal killer of father, mother, or king.

3. The Second Verse: Ingratitude and Eating What Is Vomited

Chinese Source

又契經言:「不信不知恩,斷密無容處,恒食人所吐,是最上丈夫。」

Ru-Yi Translation

Further, a scripture states: "Faithless, ungrateful, having severed every hidden opening, leaving no room to enter, forever eating what others have vomited — this is the supreme man."

Reading note — after T1606

T1606 explains this verse as taking four kinds of ordinary worldly baseness — base conduct of mind, of body, of speech, and of livelihood — and transforming each, word for word, into the very opposite: a mark of the highest attainment. "Faithless" ordinarily names one who disbelieves in future lives and the fruits of action, a genuine baseness of mind — but here it is transformed to mean one who no longer needs mere faith at all, since liberation's own knowledge and vision is now directly, personally realized. "Ungrateful" ordinarily names one who disregards a debt of past kindness, a genuine baseness of mind as well — but here it means one who correctly recognizes that nirvāṇa itself owes nothing to anything conditioned, since only conditioned things can properly be called a debt of kindness in the first place. "Having severed every hidden opening, leaving no room to enter" ordinarily evokes a thief breaking through a wall in secret, a baseness of body — but here it means one who has permanently severed the very afflictions that would otherwise give rise to a further, continuing existence. And "forever eating what others have vomited" ordinarily evokes the lowest imaginable means of subsistence, a baseness of livelihood — but here it means one who, while still making use of life's ordinary requisites to sustain the body for the time being, no longer takes any genuine delight in continued life or wealth at all, using them the way one might use something already discarded by others, without attachment. Read this way, the verse's four scandalous-sounding lines each name a specific, genuine excellence — direct realization, correct recognition of what actually constitutes a debt, permanent severing of affliction, and complete non-attachment to worldly sustenance — concealed beneath language that, taken literally, would describe the lowest of persons rather than the highest.

4. The Third Verse: Firmness Within What Is Not Firm

Chinese Source

又契經言:「覺不堅為堅,善住於顛倒,極煩惱所惱,得最上菩提。」

Ru-Yi Translation

Further, a scripture states: "Awakening firm within what is not firm, well abiding within inversion, thoroughly afflicted by the deepest affliction — one attains supreme awakening."

Reading note — after T1606

T1606 notes that this same verse has already been examined once before, in Part 81's account of the four hidden implications, where its meaning was unpacked in full: firmness directed toward what is not itself fixed or agitated, an inversion that is itself correct because it reverses the four ordinary inversions of permanence, pleasure, self, and purity, and an affliction that names not defilement but the genuine exhaustion of sustained, diligent effort. Here, T1606 adds only its underlying essence: this describes bodhisattvas who, resting on concentration, realize supreme awakening specifically through the path of seeing and the path of cultivation together — the very same two paths that have structured this treatise's own account of the noble path from its earliest pages.

Part 130 Complete

Three enigmatic verses and their hidden meanings are now examined. Part 131 turns to two further scriptural passages presented in this same concealed manner — one naming five dharmas that appear to obstruct generosity but actually perfect it, and one naming five dharmas that define genuine purity of conduct — before the treatise closes with its own explanation of why it bears the title it does.

Continue to Part 131 — The Final Concealed Teachings, and Why This Treatise Bears Its Name →