Part 13 of the collection · Fascicle 2 of 5 · 佛所行讚 T0192

The Search for the Prince (II)

The minister tries a different tack: a philosophical argument that purity, impurity, and even the arrival of old age, sickness, and death are fixed by an inner nature no effort of will can change — so seeking liberation by deliberate practice is itself confused, and one may as well return to the throne, as several named kings of the past did after their own time in the forest. The prince's answer rejects the premise outright, and the chapter ends with the envoys' concession: his resolve cannot be moved, and they turn back, though not without leaving a hidden watcher behind to track him further.

Translator: Ru-Yi Meditation Center Status: Part 13 of 43 complete Source: Taishō T0192, 佛所行讚 (tr. Dharmakṣema, early 5th c.)

The Minister's Counter-Argument

Chinese Source

大臣內思惟: 「太子大丈夫,
深識德隨順, 所說有因緣。」

而告太子言: 「如王子所說,
求法法應爾, 但今非是時。

父王衰暮年, 念子增憂悲,
雖曰樂解脫, 反更為非法。

雖樂出無慧, 不思深細理,
不見因求果, 徒捨現法歡。

有言有後世, 又復有言無,
有無既不判, 何為捨現樂?

若當有後世, 應任其所得,
若言後世無, 無即為解脫。

有言有後世, 不說解脫因,
如地堅火暖, 水濕風飄動,
後世亦復然, 此則性自爾。

有說淨不淨, 各從自性起,
言可方便移, 此則愚癡說。

諸根行境界, 自性皆決定,
愛念與不念, 自性定亦然,
老病死等苦, 誰方便使然?

謂水能滅火, 火令水煎消,
自性增相壞, 性和成眾生。

如人處胎中, 手足諸體分,
神識自然成, 誰有為之者?

蕀刺誰令利? 此則性自然,
及種種禽獸, 無欲使爾者。

諸有生天者, 自在天所為,
及餘造化者, 無自力方便。

若有所由生, 彼亦能令滅,
何須自方便, 而求於解脫?

有言我令生, 亦復我令滅,
有言無由生, 要方便而滅。

如人生育子, 不負於祖宗,
學仙人遺典, 奉天大祠祀,
此三無所負, 則名為解脫。

古今之所傳, 此三求解脫,
若以餘方便, 徒勞而無實。

汝欲求解脫, 唯習上方便,
父王憂悲息, 解脫道得申,
捨家遊山林, 還歸亦非過。

昔奄婆梨王, 久處苦行林,
捨徒眾眷屬, 還家居王位。

國王子羅摩, 去國處山林,
聞國風俗離, 還歸維正化。

娑樓婆國王, 名曰頭樓摩,
父子遊山林, 終亦俱還國。

婆私晝牟尼, 及與安低疊,
山林修梵行, 父亦歸本國。

如是等先勝, 正法善名稱,
悉還王領國, 如燈照世間。

是故捨山林, 正法化非過。」

Ru-Yi Translation

The minister thought to himself: "This prince is truly a great man; his understanding of virtue and his conduct both run deep, and what he has said has its own sound reasoning behind it."

Yet he still said to the prince: "As you yourself have said, the pursuit of the Dharma ought indeed to be as you describe it — but now is simply not the right time for it.

Your father the king is already advanced in years, and his longing for you only deepens his grief and sorrow; even if you call this a delight in liberation, it becomes, in effect, a going against the true Dharma instead.

To take delight in going forth without true wisdom, without reflecting on the deep and subtle principles involved, failing to see how a cause must be examined before its fruit is sought — this is merely to abandon, for nothing, the joys one already has in this present life.

Some say there is a life to come, and others say there is none — but since the question of its existence or non-existence cannot even be settled, why should one abandon the pleasures one has right now for its sake?

Should there indeed be a life to come, one ought simply to accept whatever comes of it in due course; and should it be said there is no life to come at all, then this very non-existence would itself already be liberation.

And even those who say there is a life to come do not, on that basis, explain any actual cause of liberation — for just as earth is naturally hard, fire naturally warm, water naturally moist, and wind naturally given to motion, so too is the life to come: this is simply the nature of things, exactly as it is.

Some say that purity and impurity each arise from one's own inherent nature, and that this can nonetheless be altered by some skillful means or another — but this is nothing but a foolish and confused claim.

The faculties, and the very objects and realms in which they operate, are all fixed entirely by their own inherent nature; what is held dear and what is not are likewise fixed by that same inherent nature — so who, then, could possibly employ some skillful means to bring about old age, sickness, death, and every such suffering?

It is said that water is able to extinguish fire, while fire in turn boils water away entirely — inherent natures increase or destroy one another in just this way, and it is through the harmonizing of these very natures that sentient beings come to be.

Consider a person still within the womb: the hands, the feet, every part of the body, and the very consciousness that inhabits it — all of this forms of itself entirely naturally; who, then, is the one actually bringing this about?

Who is it that makes the thorn sharp? This, too, is simply its own inherent nature, and it is the same with every kind of bird and beast — there is no one who deliberately wills them to be as they are.

As for those who are born into heaven, this is the doing of Īśvara, the Sovereign God, or of whatever other creator-deity there may be — it is not accomplished through anyone's own individual effort or skillful means.

And if there is indeed some cause by which a thing comes to be, then that very same cause is equally capable of bringing about its cessation — so what need is there, then, to seek liberation through some deliberate effort of one's own?

Some say: it is I myself who bring about arising, and I myself, too, who bring about cessation. Others say: there is no cause at all for arising, yet cessation still requires some deliberate means.

Consider, then, these three: a man who fathers and raises children thereby discharges his debt to his ancestors; one who studies the teachings handed down by the sages of old, and one who reverently performs the great sacrificial rites to the gods — in fulfilling these three duties, with no debt left outstanding, this alone is what may rightly be called liberation.

This is what has been handed down from ancient times to the present as the true path to liberation, through these three alone — should one seek it instead by any other means, one's efforts will prove nothing but wasted labor, without any real substance to them.

If you truly wish to seek liberation, you need only take up this supreme means I have described: let your father the king's grief and sorrow come to rest, and the path of liberation will still remain open to you fully — for to leave home and wander the mountain forests, only to return again afterward, is itself no fault at all.

In ages past, King Ambarīṣa dwelt long in a forest of ascetic practice, and yet, in the end, set aside his own band of followers and returned home to take up the throne once more.

The royal prince Rāma, too, once left his own kingdom to dwell in the mountain forests, but on hearing that the customs of his own land were falling into disarray, he returned home and restored its true governance.

The king of the country of Śālva, named Dilīpa, and his own son, both once wandered the mountain forests together, and yet, in the end, both returned to their kingdom as well.

The sage Vasiṣṭha and the sage Antideva likewise once cultivated the holy life in the mountain forests, and Antideva's own father returned to his own kingdom afterward as well.

All these excellent kings of ages past, renowned for their true and virtuous rule, in every case returned in the end to govern their own kingdoms, shining upon the world like a lamp.

This being so, to leave the mountain forest and take up the transformative rule of the true Dharma is itself no fault at all."

The Prince's Final Answer

Chinese Source

太子聞大臣, 愛語饒益說,
以常理不亂, 無礙而庠序,
固志安隱說, 而答於大臣:
「有無等猶豫, 二心疑惑增,
而作有無說, 我不決定取,
淨智修苦行, 決定我自知。

世間猶豫論, 展轉相傳習,
無有真實義, 此則我不安,
明人別真偽, 信豈由他生?

猶如生盲人, 以盲人為導,
於夜大闇中, 當復何所從?

於淨不淨法, 世間生疑惑,
設不見真實, 應行清淨道,
寧苦行淨法, 非樂行不淨。

觀彼相承說, 無一決定相,
真言虛心受, 永離諸過患,
語過虛偽說, 智者所不言。

如說羅摩等, 捨家修梵行,
終歸還本國, 服習五欲者,
此等為陋行, 智者所不依。

我今當為汝, 略說其要義。

日月墜於地, 須彌雪山轉,
我身終不易, 退入於非處。

寧身投盛火, 不以義不畢,
還歸於本國, 入於五欲火。」

表斯要誓已, 徐起而長辭。

Ru-Yi Translation

The prince, hearing the minister's kind and well-meaning counsel, spoken with unwavering logic and orderly, unhindered reasoning, answered him calmly and with a resolve unshaken, saying: "Whether there is or is not a life to come remains a matter of doubt and uncertainty, and a mind divided between the two only deepens its own confusion — as for these claims made about existence and non-existence, I myself take no fixed position on either one; through pure wisdom and the practice of ascetic effort, I shall come to know this for myself, with certainty.

The doubtful theories of this world are merely passed on from one person to another, generation after generation, with no true or ultimate meaning in them at all — and it is exactly this that leaves me unsettled; for a person of true clarity distinguishes truth from falsehood for himself — how could genuine conviction ever arise merely from what another person tells him?

It is like a man born blind, taking another blind man as his guide — in the depths of night, in utter darkness, where could either of them possibly find their way?

Where the world itself remains in doubt over what is pure and what is impure, then, even should one fail to see the ultimate truth of the matter with certainty, one ought still to follow the path of purity regardless — better to labor at a practice that is at least pure, than to take pleasure in one that is impure.

Examining these various teachings handed down one after another, I find not a single one of them offers any truly fixed and certain mark — to accept a teaching as true with an open but undiscerning heart, without ever genuinely freeing oneself from every possible fault in it, is itself a fault of speech, an empty and false kind of teaching, and the wise do not speak in such a way.

As for what you have said of Rāma and the others — that they left home to cultivate the holy life, only to return in the end to their own kingdoms and take up again the practice of the five desires — such conduct is itself base and unworthy, and the wise do not rely upon it as any model.

Let me now explain to you, in brief, the essential point of the matter.

Sooner would the sun and moon fall to the earth, sooner would Mount Sumeru and the snowy mountains themselves be overturned, than my own resolve ever be changed, or ever retreat back into what is not the true path.

I would sooner throw my own body into a raging fire than, my true purpose left unfulfilled, return to my own kingdom and cast myself into the fire of the five desires instead."

Having declared this solemn vow, he rose slowly, and took his long and final leave of them.

The Envoys Give Up

Chinese Source

太子辯鋒炎, 猶如盛日光,
王師及大臣, 言論莫能勝。

相謂計已盡, 唯當辭退還,
深敬嘆太子, 不敢強逼留。

敬奉王命故, 不敢速疾還,
徘徊於中路, 行邁顧遲遲。

選擇黠慧人, 審諦機悟士,
隱身密伺候, 然後捨而還。

Ru-Yi Translation

The prince's own sharp eloquence blazed like the full brilliance of the sun, and neither the king's teacher nor his minister could prevail against him in argument.

Turning to one another, they agreed that every possible argument had now been exhausted, and that they had no choice but to take their leave and return; filled with deep reverence and admiration for the prince, they did not dare to press him further or force him to stay.

Yet, mindful still of their duty to the king's own command, they did not dare to hurry back too quickly either; they lingered along the way, walking on slowly, looking back again and again.

They chose a clever and perceptive man, one of keen discernment and quick understanding, to remain behind in hiding and watch over him in secret, and only then did they finally take their leave and return home.

Part 13 Complete

This closes Part 13, and with it Fascicle Two and Chapter 9: the minister's determinism argument, the prince's rejection of it, his final unbreakable vow, and the envoys' return, leaving only a hidden watcher behind. Part 14 opens Fascicle Three with Chapter 10, "King Bimbisāra Visits the Prince," where the prince, now begging for alms in the city of Rājagṛha, is spotted and approached by the ruler of Magadha himself.

Continue to Part 14 — King Bimbisāra Visits the Prince →