The Twelve Links in Full
Continuing directly from the "three realms are mind-only" declaration, the treatise now works through the twelve links of dependent origination in full technical detail: the twofold activity of each link, from ignorance as the confusion that deludes sentient beings and the cause of formations, all the way through to death's destruction of the aggregate-body and the absence of full knowledge that lets continuity carry on unbroken; the complete sequential chain, forward through arising and in reverse through cessation; the classification of the twelve links into three unbroken continuities — the path of affliction, the path of karma, and the path of suffering; a contemplation that guards against error, refuting three mistaken consequences an outsider might raise against dependent origination; a three-time analysis distributing the links across past, present, and future; their further classification into three kinds of suffering; and the opening of the treatise's own deep contemplation, refuting all four extremes of causation.
The Twofold Activity of Ignorance, and the Twelve Links in Sequence
經曰:是中無明有二種作:一者緣中癡令眾生惑;二者與行作因。行亦有二種作:一者生未來世果報;二者與識作因。識亦有二種作:一者能令有相續;二者與名色作因。名色亦有二種作:一者互相助成;二者與六入作因。六入亦有二種作:一者能緣六塵;二者與觸作因。觸亦有二種作:一者能觸所緣;二者與受作因。受亦有二種作:一者覺憎愛等事;二者與愛作因。愛亦有二種作:一者於可染中生貪心;二者與取作因。取亦有二種作:一者增長煩惱染縛;二者與有作因。有亦有二種作:一者能於餘道中生;二者與生作因。生亦有二種作:一者增長五陰;二者與老作因。老亦有二種作:一者令諸根熟;二者與死作因。死亦有二種作:一者壞五陰身;二者以不見知故而令相續不絕。
論曰:是中壞五陰身以不見知而令相續不絕者,壞五陰能作後生因,以不見知故能作後生因,是名他因觀。云何自因觀?無明等自生因觀緣事故。何者是無明等因緣行?不斷助成故。
經曰:是中無明緣行者,無明因緣令行不斷,助成行故。行緣識者,行因緣令識不斷,助成識故。識緣名色者,識因緣令名色不斷,助成名色故。名色緣六入者,名色因緣令六入不斷,助成六入故。六入緣觸者,六入因緣令觸不斷,助成觸故。觸緣受者,觸因緣令受不斷,助成受故。受緣愛者,受因緣令愛不斷,助成愛故。愛緣取者,愛因緣令取不斷,助成取故。取緣有者,取因緣令有不斷,助成有故。有緣生者,有因緣令生不斷,助成生故。生緣老死者,生因緣令老死不斷,助成老死故。無明滅故則行滅,無明因緣無,行滅,不助成故。行滅故則識滅,行因緣無,識滅,不助成故。識滅故則名色滅,識因緣無,名色滅,不助成故。名色滅故則六入滅,名色因緣無,六入滅,不助成故。六入滅故則觸滅,六入因緣無,觸滅,不助成故。觸滅故則受滅,觸因緣無,受滅,不助成故。受滅故則愛滅,受因緣無,愛滅,不助成故。愛滅故則取滅,愛因緣無,取滅,不助成故。取滅故則有滅,取因緣無,有滅,不助成故。有滅故則生滅,有因緣無,生滅,不助成故。生滅故則老死滅,生因緣無,老死滅,不助成故。
論曰:是中無明緣行,無明因緣令行不斷,助成行故者,無明有二種:一、子時;二、果時。是中子時者,令行不斷,有二種義故,緣事示現。如是餘因緣分、自生因二種義,緣事應知。自因觀者,不相捨離觀故,離前支無後支觀故。不離無明則成行觀,若不離無明有行者,不應言無明緣行。若離無明有行成者,異則不成。是故偈言:「眾緣所生法,是則不即因,亦復不異因,非斷亦非常。」自生因緣觀,如前說。無明有二種:一、子時;二、果時。行乃至老死亦如是。先際後際滅,中際亦無,是故不說。云何攝過觀?所謂三道攝,苦因苦果故。
Sūtra: Here, ignorance has a twofold activity: first, as the confusion within conditions that deludes sentient beings; second, as the cause that gives rise to formations. Formations likewise have a twofold activity: first, generating the resultant retribution of a future life; second, serving as the cause of consciousness. Consciousness likewise has a twofold activity: first, enabling existence to continue without break; second, serving as the cause of name-and-form. Name-and-form likewise have a twofold activity: first, mutually assisting one another to completion; second, serving as the cause of the six sense-bases. The six sense-bases likewise have a twofold activity: first, being able to take the six sense-objects as their condition; second, serving as the cause of contact. Contact likewise has a twofold activity: first, being able to touch its object-condition; second, serving as the cause of feeling. Feeling likewise has a twofold activity: first, experiencing such matters as aversion and attachment; second, serving as the cause of craving. Craving likewise has a twofold activity: first, giving rise to a mind of greed toward whatever can be defiled; second, serving as the cause of grasping. Grasping likewise has a twofold activity: first, increasing the bondage of the defilement of affliction; second, serving as the cause of existence. Existence likewise has a twofold activity: first, being able to give rise to birth within the other destinies; second, serving as the cause of birth. Birth likewise has a twofold activity: first, increasing the five aggregates; second, serving as the cause of aging. Aging likewise has a twofold activity: first, causing every faculty to ripen; second, serving as the cause of death. Death likewise has a twofold activity: first, destroying the body of the five aggregates; second, on account of the absence of full knowledge and awareness, causing continuity to remain unbroken.
Commentary: Here, "destroying the body of the five aggregates, and, on account of the absence of full knowledge and awareness, causing continuity to remain unbroken" means that the destruction of the five aggregates is able to serve as the cause of a later birth, and that, on account of the absence of full knowledge and awareness, it is able to serve as the cause of a later birth — this is called the contemplation of another as cause. What, then, is the contemplation of self as cause? It is the contemplation of ignorance and the rest as their own self-generating causes, taking the entire chain as its condition and matter. What is meant by ignorance and the rest conditioning formations? It means that their continuity is unbroken, since each assists the next to completion.
Sūtra: Here, "ignorance conditions formations" means that ignorance, as condition, causes formations to continue without break, assisting formations to completion. "Formations condition consciousness" means that formations, as condition, cause consciousness to continue without break, assisting consciousness to completion. "Consciousness conditions name-and-form" means that consciousness, as condition, causes name-and-form to continue without break, assisting name-and-form to completion. "Name-and-form condition the six sense-bases" means that name-and-form, as condition, cause the six sense-bases to continue without break, assisting the six sense-bases to completion. "The six sense-bases condition contact" means that the six sense-bases, as condition, cause contact to continue without break, assisting contact to completion. "Contact conditions feeling" means that contact, as condition, causes feeling to continue without break, assisting feeling to completion. "Feeling conditions craving" means that feeling, as condition, causes craving to continue without break, assisting craving to completion. "Craving conditions grasping" means that craving, as condition, causes grasping to continue without break, assisting grasping to completion. "Grasping conditions existence" means that grasping, as condition, causes existence to continue without break, assisting existence to completion. "Existence conditions birth" means that existence, as condition, causes birth to continue without break, assisting birth to completion. "Birth conditions aging-and-death" means that birth, as condition, causes aging-and-death to continue without break, assisting aging-and-death to completion. Because ignorance ceases, formations cease: when the condition of ignorance is absent, formations cease, since there is no more assisting to completion. Because formations cease, consciousness ceases: when the condition of formations is absent, consciousness ceases, since there is no more assisting to completion. Because consciousness ceases, name-and-form cease: when the condition of consciousness is absent, name-and-form cease, since there is no more assisting to completion. Because name-and-form cease, the six sense-bases cease: when the condition of name-and-form is absent, the six sense-bases cease, since there is no more assisting to completion. Because the six sense-bases cease, contact ceases: when the condition of the six sense-bases is absent, contact ceases, since there is no more assisting to completion. Because contact ceases, feeling ceases: when the condition of contact is absent, feeling ceases, since there is no more assisting to completion. Because feeling ceases, craving ceases: when the condition of feeling is absent, craving ceases, since there is no more assisting to completion. Because craving ceases, grasping ceases: when the condition of craving is absent, grasping ceases, since there is no more assisting to completion. Because grasping ceases, existence ceases: when the condition of grasping is absent, existence ceases, since there is no more assisting to completion. Because existence ceases, birth ceases: when the condition of existence is absent, birth ceases, since there is no more assisting to completion. Because birth ceases, aging-and-death cease: when the condition of birth is absent, aging-and-death cease, since there is no more assisting to completion.
Commentary: Here, "'ignorance conditions formations' means that ignorance, as condition, causes formations to continue without break, assisting formations to completion" — ignorance is of two times: first, the seed-time; second, the fruit-time. Here, "the seed-time" causes formations to continue without break, and, because this has a twofold meaning, it is displayed by taking the entire chain as its condition and matter. In just this way, every other link in the causal chain, and its own twofold meaning as self-generating cause, should be understood as taking that entire chain as its condition and matter. "The contemplation of self as cause" means the contemplation that the links cannot be forsaken from one another, the contemplation that apart from the preceding member there is no later member. Only when not apart from ignorance is the contemplation of formations accomplished; were there formations not apart from ignorance, it would still not be right to say "ignorance conditions formations." And were there formations accomplished apart from ignorance, then, being different from it, they could not be accomplished at all. Therefore the verse says:
"The dharmas that arise from manifold conditions
are neither identical to their cause
nor different from their cause,
neither cut off nor eternal."
The contemplation of self-generating cause and condition is as already explained. Ignorance is of two times: first, the seed-time; second, the fruit-time — and it is likewise so all the way through to aging-and-death. The prior limit and the later limit cease, and the middle limit likewise has no independent existence; for this reason it is not separately discussed. What, then, is the contemplation that guards against error? It means that the twelve links are subsumed under three unbroken continuities, since they are the cause of suffering and the fruit of suffering.
Fazang reads the "twofold activity" formula not as twelve separate remarks but as one recurring structural key applied twelve times: 此十二支皆有二義:一明自行相、二助成後用。謂緣中癡惑是無明自相,與行作因是助成業用 — "these twelve links each carry a twofold meaning: first, making manifest their own characteristic-activity; second, assisting what follows to its fruition. That is, confusion within conditions is ignorance's own characteristic, while being the cause of formations is the karmic function that assists what follows." Every link's "first activity" names what it simply is; its "second activity" names what it does to the next link in the chain.
He also catches what looks like a wrinkle in the chain's final link: the sūtra attributes "the absence of full knowledge and awareness" — which sounds like ignorance itself — to death, not to the first link. Fazang asks the question directly and answers it: 論釋死支,以不見知令相續者,此是無明,何故屬死?釋:此是死時,無明因死而起故也 — "the treatise, in explaining the link of death as that which, through the absence of full knowledge, lets continuity remain unbroken — since this is itself ignorance, why is it attributed to death? [The answer:] this is the ignorance that arises at the very time of death, on account of death itself." The chain does not end in ignorance recurring from nowhere; it ends in a fresh confusion arising precisely at the moment death opens onto the next birth.
Three Unbroken Continuities, and the Contemplation That Guards Against Error
經曰:是中無明、愛、取三分不斷,是煩惱道。行、有二分不斷,是業道。餘因緣分不斷,是苦道。先際後際相續不斷故,是三道不斷。如是三道離我我所,但有生滅故,猶如束竹。
論曰:云何護過觀?若言因緣生者,分別有三種過:一者一切身一時生過。何以故?無異因故。二者自業無受報過。何以故?無作者故。三者失業過。何以故?未受果業已滅故。此三種過,以見過去世等異因答故、受生報等差別故。
Sūtra: Here, the unbroken continuity of the three portions — ignorance, craving, and grasping — is the path of affliction. The unbroken continuity of the two portions — formations and existence — is the path of karma. The unbroken continuity of the remaining portions of the causal chain is the path of suffering. Because the prior limit and the later limit continue without break, these three paths are unbroken. These three paths, in just this way, are apart from any self and from anything belonging to self, having only arising and ceasing — like a bundle of reeds bound together.
Commentary: What, then, is the contemplation that guards against error? Were one to say that all things arise from a single, undifferentiated cause and condition, three kinds of error would follow, distinctly. First, the error that every body would arise all at once. Why? Because there would be no distinguishing cause. Second, the error that one's own karma would go without receiving its retribution. Why? Because there would be no agent to carry it forward. Third, the error that karma would be lost. Why? Because karma not yet having received its fruit would already have ceased along with that undifferentiated cause. These three errors are answered by seeing that the causes belonging to the past world and the rest are distinct, and by the distinctions among the receiving of birth and its retribution.
On why the twelve links divide as ignorance/craving/grasping, formations/existence, and the remaining seven, rather than by some other count, Fazang quotes a verse he attributes to the bodhisattva Viśuddhamati's own treatise on the subject: 如淨意菩薩所造《十二緣論》頌云「煩惱初八九,業二及與十,餘七說為苦,三攝十二法……一切世間法,唯因果無人,但從諸空法,還生於空法。」 — "as the verse from the bodhisattva Viśuddhamati's own *Treatise on the Twelve Links* says: 'affliction is the first link, the eighth, and the ninth; karma is the second and the tenth; the remaining seven are spoken of as suffering — these three gather in the twelve dharmas... every dharma of the entire world is nothing but cause and effect, without any person; it arises only from empty dharmas, and returns again to give birth to empty dharmas.'" The same verse also names the numbering directly: counting ignorance as the first link, that is links one, eight, and nine for affliction (ignorance, craving, grasping); two and ten for karma (formations, existence); and the remaining seven for suffering — exactly the treatise's own division, now anchored to an independent verse tradition.
On the guarding-against-error contemplation itself, Fazang is explicit that these are not the treatise's own worries but an outsider's demand: 外人與此緣生道理出三種過...以無我異因,何為不得五道之身一時並生?...無作者故者,釋立過相。若無我作業,誰受來報? — "an outsider, against this very principle of dependent origination, raises three kinds of error... [first:] 'since there is no self to serve as a differentiating cause, why should the bodies of the five destinies not all arise together, all at once?' ... [second, glossing 'because there would be no agent':] 'if there is no self that performs the karma, who is left to receive the retribution that comes?'" The objection, in other words, assumes that denying a fixed self must collapse all causal distinctions into one undifferentiated mass — precisely the assumption the three-time analysis that follows is built to dismantle.
The Twelve Links Across Three Times, Three Kinds of Suffering, and the Opening of Deep Contemplation
經曰:無明緣行者,是見過去世事。識、名色、六入、觸、受,是見現在世事。愛、取、有、生、老死、是見未來世事。於是見有三世轉。無明滅故諸行滅、名為斷因緣相續說。
論曰:無明緣行即是見過去世事者,現在生是過去作故。現在果即是當來,即是見過去世因義。識乃至受是見現在世事者,過去世中隨所有業,彼業得現在識等果報,復能得未來果報。愛取有是見未來世事者,復有生一往定故。於是見有三世轉者,復有後世生轉故。此說何義?有三種義故。過去業不得報,或有未作或已作未得報,或得對治斷故。是中無明緣行,是作示現;行緣識乃至觸受,此作已得報示現;愛取有不斷,此不得對治示現。若斷愛取,雖有作業,則無明緣行不能生有。是故諸業有已作未作、有得果未得果、有已斷未斷。若如是,則無一切身一時生過。若爾,非一切業即當來受,亦非不受,亦非一時。若自作業果報不失,非他身受故。若如是,則無自業不受報過,他不作故。離彼三事業,定得果不失。若如是,則無失業過。是名護三種過示現。云何不厭厭觀?厭種種微苦分別,所有受皆是苦故,及厭種種麁苦故。
經曰:十二因緣分說名三苦。是中無明、行、識、名色、六入,名為行苦;觸、受,名為苦苦;餘因緣分名為壞苦。無明滅故行滅,乃至生滅故老死滅,名為斷三苦相續說。
論曰:云何深觀?
經曰:無明因緣行生,因緣能生行,餘亦如是。無明滅行滅行無,餘亦如是。無明因緣行,是生縛說,餘亦如是。無明滅行滅,是滅縛說,餘亦如是。無明因緣行,是隨順有觀說,餘亦如是。無明滅行滅,是隨順無所有盡觀說,餘亦如是。
論曰:深觀者有四種:一者有分非他作,自因生故。二者非自作,緣生故。如經「無明因緣行生,因緣能生行,餘亦如是。無明滅行滅行無,餘亦如是」故。三者非二作,但隨順生故、無知者故、作時不住故。如經「無明因緣行,是生縛說,餘亦如是。無明滅行滅,是滅縛說,餘亦如是」故。四者非無因作,隨順有故。如經「無明因緣行,是隨順有觀說,餘亦如是。無明滅行滅,是隨順無所有盡觀說,餘亦如是」故。若無因生,生應常生、非不生。以無定因故,亦可恒不生。何以故?無因生故。此非佛法所樂。若爾,隨順有觀有因非無因故,若無因不得言隨順有。是名十種因緣集觀相諦差別觀已說。
Sūtra: "Ignorance conditions formations" is the seeing of the affairs of the past world. Consciousness, name-and-form, the six sense-bases, contact, and feeling are the seeing of the affairs of the present world. Craving, grasping, existence, birth, and aging-and-death are the seeing of the affairs of the future world. In this, one sees the turning of the three times. "Because ignorance ceases, all the formations cease" is named the explanation of the cutting off of the causal chain's continuity.
Commentary: "'Ignorance conditions formations' is precisely the seeing of the affairs of the past world" — because the present birth is what the past has done. The present fruit is precisely what is to come, and this is precisely the meaning of seeing the cause belonging to the past world. "Consciousness all the way through feeling is the seeing of the affairs of the present world" — because whatever karma there was within the past world obtains, as its fruit of retribution, consciousness and the rest in the present, and is, further, able to obtain a fruit of retribution in the future. "Craving, grasping, and existence are the seeing of the affairs of the future world" — because there is, further, a birth definitely bound to occur within a single future span. "In this, one sees the turning of the three times" — because there is, further, the turning of a subsequent birth in a later world still. What is the meaning of this? It has a threefold meaning. Karma of the past does not uniformly obtain its retribution, for there is karma not yet done, karma already done but not yet having obtained its retribution, and karma that has already obtained the antidote and been cut off. Here, "ignorance conditions formations" displays the doing of karma; "formations condition consciousness" all the way through "contact conditions feeling" display this doing having already obtained its retribution; and the unbroken continuity of craving, grasping, and existence displays what has not yet obtained the antidote. Were craving and grasping cut off, then, even though karma had been done, "ignorance conditions formations" would no longer be able to give rise to existence. For this reason, among all these karmic actions there are those already done and those not yet done, those that have obtained their fruit and those that have not yet obtained it, those already cut off and those not yet cut off. If it is so, then there is no error of every body arising all at once. And if so, it is neither that all karma is received all at once in the time to come, nor that none of it is received, nor that it is all received in a single moment. If the fruit of retribution belonging to karma one has done oneself is never lost, it is because it is not received by another's body. If it is so, then there is no error of one's own karma going without receiving its retribution, since another did not do it. Apart from these three matters of karma, one definitely obtains the fruit without any loss. If it is so, then there is no error of karma being lost. This is called the display that guards against these three kinds of error. What, then, is the contemplation of wearying of what should be wearied of? He is wearied by his discernment of all the manifold, subtle forms of suffering, since whatever is felt is entirely a matter of suffering, and he is wearied also by every manifold, gross form of suffering.
Sūtra: The portions of the twelve links of dependent origination are also named the three kinds of suffering. Here, ignorance, formations, consciousness, name-and-form, and the six sense-bases are named the suffering of formations; contact and feeling are named the suffering of suffering; and the remaining portions of the causal chain are named the suffering of decay. "Because ignorance ceases, formations cease," all the way to "because birth ceases, aging-and-death cease," is named the explanation of the cutting off of the continuity of the three kinds of suffering.
Commentary: What, then, is deep contemplation?
Sūtra: Ignorance, as cause and condition, gives rise to formations — it is the cause and condition itself that is able to give rise to formations — and it is likewise so for the rest. Because ignorance ceases, formations cease, and formations are without independent existence — it is likewise so for the rest. "Ignorance, as cause and condition, gives rise to formations" is spoken of as the bondage of arising — it is likewise so for the rest. "Because ignorance ceases, formations cease" is spoken of as the bondage of cessation — it is likewise so for the rest. "Ignorance, as cause and condition, gives rise to formations" is spoken of as the contemplation that accords with existence — it is likewise so for the rest. "Because ignorance ceases, formations cease" is spoken of as the contemplation that accords with the exhaustion of all that has nothing whatsoever — it is likewise so for the rest.
Commentary: Deep contemplation is of four kinds. First, that each link is a portion of existence not made by another, since it arises from its own cause. Second, that it is not self-made, since it arises through conditions — as the sūtra says, "ignorance, as cause and condition, gives rise to formations; it is the cause and condition itself that is able to give rise to formations, and it is likewise so for the rest; because ignorance ceases, formations cease, and formations are without independent existence, and it is likewise so for the rest." Third, that it is made neither by both together nor by neither, since it only accords with arising, since there is no knower of it, and since, at the very moment of its arising, it does not abide — as the sūtra says, "'ignorance, as cause and condition, gives rise to formations' is spoken of as the bondage of arising, and it is likewise so for the rest; 'because ignorance ceases, formations cease' is spoken of as the bondage of cessation, and it is likewise so for the rest." Fourth, that it is not made without any cause at all, since it accords with existence — as the sūtra says, "'ignorance, as cause and condition, gives rise to formations' is spoken of as the contemplation that accords with existence, and it is likewise so for the rest; 'because ignorance ceases, formations cease' is spoken of as the contemplation that accords with the exhaustion of all that has nothing whatsoever, and it is likewise so for the rest." Were there an arising without any cause at all, then arising ought to be constant, and never a non-arising. And since there would be no fixed cause, it might equally always fail to arise at all. Why? Because it would be an arising without cause — and this is not what the buddha-dharma takes delight in. If it is so, then the contemplation that accords with existence has a cause, and is not causeless; for, were there no cause, one could not speak of "according with existence." This concludes the explanation of the ten kinds of contemplation of the gathering of causes and conditions, the contemplation of the distinctions among the truths of characteristics.
On the three-time division itself, Fazang notes that our treatise's own scheme is only one of several competing traditions, and lines it up against two others by name: 此十二支,初二是能引、次五是所引、次三是能生、後二是所生。於中分別三際,諸聖教中略有三說:一依此經……二依《唯識論》,開能所生、合能所引,是故前十現在、後二未來……三生引俱開,如《智論》「初二過去、次八現在、後二未來,故成三世」 — "of these twelve links, the first two are the drawing-cause, the next five are what is drawn, the next three are the generating-cause, and the last two are what is generated. Among the sacred teachings there are, in brief, three accounts of how these are distinguished across the three times: first, in dependence on this sūtra [our treatise's own scheme, as just translated above]... second, in dependence on the Vijñaptimātratāsiddhi, which separates the generating from the generated but merges the drawing with the drawn, so that the first ten links are present and only the last two are future... third, keeping both the drawing and the generating separate, as the *Mahāprajñāpāramitā-śāstra says: 'the first two are past, the next eight are present, and the last two are future — thus the three times are completed.'" Three respected authorities, in other words, cut the same twelve links at three different points.
Fazang closes this stretch of commentary with a line that ties the entire three-time analysis back to the doctrine of no-self: 又由此三際因果輪迴,人法二我永無所有 — "and, moreover, through this very cycling of cause and effect across the three times, both the self of persons and the self of dharmas are, in the end, utterly without existence." The three-time distinctions are not offered as a neutral chronology; they are the demonstration that nothing continuous or substantial rides along the chain from one time to the next.
Part 30 Complete
This closes Part 30. The treatise has now set out the twelve links of dependent origination in full technical detail: the twofold activity belonging to each link, from ignorance as the confusion that deludes sentient beings and the cause of formations, all the way through to death's destruction of the aggregate-body and the absence of full knowledge that lets continuity carry on unbroken into a further birth; the complete sequential chain, forward through the arising of each link from the one before it and in reverse through the cessation of each link once its condition is removed; the classification of the twelve links into three unbroken continuities — ignorance, craving, and grasping as the path of affliction, formations and existence as the path of karma, and the remaining seven links as the path of suffering; a contemplation that guards against error, refuting the three mistaken consequences an outsider might raise against dependent origination by distinguishing what is already done from what is not yet done, what has borne fruit from what has not, and what has been cut off from what has not; a three-time analysis distributing the links across past, present, and future; their further classification into three kinds of suffering — the suffering of formations, the suffering of suffering, and the suffering of decay; and the opening of the treatise's own deep contemplation, refuting in turn each of the four extreme views of causation — that a link is made by another, made by itself, made by both together, or made by no cause at all. Part 31 continues within this same contemplation of dependent origination, turning to four further kinds of deep contemplation, ten modes of forward and reverse contemplation, a further twofold contemplation joining great compassion to the wisdom that discerns every characteristic, the threefold gate of liberation, and the intensifying of this great compassion into a vigorous, unremitting practice.
Continue to Part 31 — Ten Modes of Forward and Reverse Contemplation →