If You Meet the Buddha, Kill the Buddha
示眾(二)
This text's most quoted and most frequently misread line, in its own original setting — together with the three eye-lands, a warning against timid "bride" Chan teachers who never dare disparage anyone, the true buddha who has no form at all, the three realms relocated as furniture in your own house, and the fourfold scheme of guest and host that later tradition would systematize as one of Linji's core teaching devices.
- This part covers
- The three eye-lands and the buddha who cannot expound the Dharma; a warning against never daring to judge one's own teacher; the "living patriarch" whose mind is never different from moment to moment; the Buddha's true six supernatural powers as freedom from deception rather than magic; "kill the Buddha, kill the patriarch"; the three realms as furniture already sitting in your own house; and the fourfold scheme of guest and host.
- A note on this part's title
- "If you meet the Buddha, kill the Buddha" (逢佛殺佛) is this text's single most quoted line, and also its single most commonly misread one out of context. Read it inside Section 6 below, where Linji states in the same breath what "killing" is actually for.
1. The Three Eye-Lands, and the Buddha Who Cannot Expound the Dharma
問:「如何是三眼國土?」師云:「我共儞入淨妙國土中,著清淨衣,說法身佛;又入無差別國土中,著無差別衣,說報身佛;又入解脫國土中,著光明衣,說化身佛。此三眼國土皆是依變,約經論家取法身為根本,報、化二身為用。山僧見處,法身即不解說法。所以,古人云:『身依義立,土據體論。』法性身、法性土,明知是建立之法依通國土,空拳黃葉用誑小兒,蒺藜夌刺枯骨上覓什麼汁?心外無法,內亦不可得,求什麼物?爾諸方言:『道有修、有證。』莫錯,設有修得者,皆是生死業。爾言六度萬行齊修,我見皆是造業。求佛、求法,即是造地獄業;求菩薩亦是造業;看經、看教亦是造業。佛與祖師是無事人,所以有漏有為、無漏無為,為清淨業。有一般瞎禿子飽喫飯了,便坐禪觀行,把捉念漏不令放起,厭喧求靜,是外道法。祖師云:『爾若住心看靜,舉心外照、攝心內澄、凝心入定,如是之流皆是造作。』是爾如今與麼聽法底人作麼生擬修他、證他、莊嚴他?渠且不是修底物、不是莊嚴得底物。若教他莊嚴,一切物即莊嚴得,爾且莫錯。」
Someone asked: "What are the three eye-lands?" The master said: "Together with you I enter the land of pure subtlety, put on the robe of purity, and expound the dharma-body buddha; I enter the land of non-differentiation, put on the robe of non-differentiation, and expound the reward-body buddha; I enter the land of liberation, put on the robe of light, and expound the transformation-body buddha. These three eye-lands are all matters of dependent transformation. The scholars of the sūtras and treatises take the dharma-body as the root, with the reward- and transformation-bodies as its function; as I see it, the dharma-body cannot expound the Dharma at all. That is why the ancients said: 'The body is established by way of meaning; the land is discussed by way of substance.' The dharma-nature body and the dharma-nature land are clearly an established dharma, a land of dependent penetration — an empty fist, a yellow leaf, used to fool little children. What juice could you find by squeezing thorns and thistles, or dry bones? Outside of mind there is no dharma, and nothing can be found within either — so what are you looking for? You people say everywhere: 'The Way has cultivation, the Way has realization.' Do not make this mistake: even supposing there were something to attain, it would be nothing but the karma of birth and death. You say the six perfections and ten thousand practices must be cultivated together, but as I see it, all of this is only creating karma. Seeking the Buddha, seeking the Dharma, is creating the karma of hell; seeking the bodhisattva is likewise creating karma; reading the sūtras and studying the teachings is likewise creating karma. Buddhas and patriarchs are people with nothing to do — hence the "outflow" and "conditioned" on one side, the "no-outflow" and "unconditioned" on the other, are alike simply pure karma. There is a type of blind, shave-pated fool who, once he has eaten his fill, sits in meditation practicing contemplation, gripping down on every thought to keep it from arising, wearying of noise and seeking quiet — this is the way of a non-Buddhist. A patriarch said: 'If you dwell the mind to watch stillness, raise the mind to illuminate outwardly, gather the mind to clarify inwardly, concentrate the mind to enter concentration — all such practices are nothing but contrivance.' How, then, should you — the very person listening to this Dharma right now — go about cultivating it, realizing it, adorning it? It is simply not a thing that can be cultivated, not a thing adornment can be applied to. Yet if you did try to adorn it, every single thing could be adorned by it — do not make this mistake either."
The "three eye-lands" (三眼國土) rework the standard three bodies of buddhahood already relocated in Part 2 into three lands seen through, rather than lands one is reborn into — "eye" naming a way of seeing rather than a destination. The blunt image "an empty fist, a yellow leaf, used to fool little children" is a stock Chan phrase for any expedient teaching mistaken for the thing it points to; Linji applies it here to the very Buddhist scholastic vocabulary — dharma-body, dharma-nature land — his own listeners would have taken as bedrock doctrine.
2. Not Daring to Judge a Good Teacher
道流!爾取這一般老師口裏語為是真道,是善知識不思議。『我是凡夫心,不敢測度他老宿。』瞎屢生!爾一生秖作這箇見解,辜負這一雙眼,冷噤噤地如凍凌上驢駒相似。『我不敢毀善知識,怕生口業。』道流!夫大善知識始敢毀佛毀祖、是非天下、排斥三藏教、罵辱諸小兒、向逆順中覓人,所以我於十二年中求一箇業性,如芥子許不可得。若似新婦子禪師,便即怕趁出院,不與飯喫、不安不樂。自古先輩到處人不信,被遞出始知是貴。若到處人盡肯,堪作什麼?所以師子一吼,野干腦裂。道流!諸方說有道可修、有法可證。爾說證何法?修何道?爾今用處欠少什麼物?修補何處?後生小阿師不會,便即信這般野狐精魅,許他說事繫縛人,言道理行相應、護惜三業始得成佛,如此說者如春細雨。古人云:『路逢達道人,第一莫向道。』所以言:若人修道道不行,萬般邪境競頭生,智劍出來無一物,明頭未顯暗頭明。所以,古人云:『平常心是道。』
Followers of the Way! You take the words from the mouth of some ordinary teacher as the true Way, thinking such a good teacher inconceivable. "I have only an ordinary man's mind," you say, "I dare not fathom that venerable elder." Blind fools! You spend your whole lives forming exactly this kind of view, betraying this very pair of eyes you have, shivering there like a donkey's colt stuck fast on the ice. "I dare not disparage a good teacher," you say, "for fear of creating the karma of speech." Followers of the Way! A truly great good teacher is exactly the one who dares to disparage Buddha and disparage the patriarchs, pass judgment on the whole world, cast aside the Tripiṭaka's teachings, revile every young monk, and seek out the person in the very midst of praise and blame alike. That is why, for twelve years, I searched for a single karmic trace in myself, and could not find so much as a mustard seed's worth. Someone like the timid "bride" kind of Chan teacher is forever afraid of being driven from the monastery, of being denied food, of being left uneasy and unhappy. Since ancient times, wherever the elders went, people at first refused to believe in them; only once they were driven out did people finally know them for worthy. If everyone everywhere simply approves of you, what good are you? Hence, when the lion roars once, the wild jackal's brain splits open. Followers of the Way! Everywhere people say there is a Way to cultivate, a Dharma to realize. Tell me — what dharma would you realize? What way would you cultivate? What is lacking in your own activity right now? What is there to repair? Young novices who do not understand this go and believe in this kind of wild-fox spirit, letting it bind them with its talk, saying that only by matching one's conduct to principle and guarding the three karmic actions can buddhahood be attained — talk like this is no more than a fine spring drizzle. The ancients said: "If you meet a person who has reached the Way on the road, above all do not address him with talk of the Way." Hence it is said: if a person cultivates the Way, the Way does not proceed; ten thousand kinds of deviant realms compete to spring up; once the sword of wisdom comes out, there is not a single thing left; before the bright side has even shown itself, the dark side is already bright. Hence the ancients said: "The ordinary mind is the Way."
The "twelve years" Linji spent searching for "a single karmic trace" in himself and finding nothing "not even a mustard seed's worth" is one of this text's rare first-person autobiographical claims outside the formal biographical record in Part 6, and it directly grounds his sharpest instruction here: refusing ever to criticize a teacher, out of fear of "the karma of speech," is itself named a fault rather than a virtue. "The ordinary mind is the Way" (平常心是道), attributed here simply to "the ancients," is a saying central to the teaching of Mazu Daoyi's lineage, from which Linji's own house ultimately descends.
3. The Living Patriarch, and the True Buddha With No Form
大德!覓什麼物?現今目前聽法無依道人歷歷地分明,未曾欠少。爾若欲得與祖佛不別,但如是見,不用疑誤。爾心心不異,名之活祖。心若有異,則性相別;心不異故,即性相不別。」
問:「如何是心心不異處?」師云:「爾擬問早異了也,性相各分,道流莫錯。世、出世諸法,皆無自性、亦無生性,但有空名,名字亦空。爾秖麼認他閑名為實,大錯了也。設有,皆是依變之境。有箇菩提依、涅槃依、解脫依、三身依、境智依、菩薩依、佛依。爾向依變國土中覓什麼物?乃至三乘十二分教,皆是拭不淨故紙。佛是幻化身,祖是老比丘,爾還是娘生已否?爾若求佛,即被佛魔攝;爾若求祖,即被祖魔縛;爾若有求皆苦,不如無事。有一般禿比丘向學人道:『佛是究竟,於三大阿僧祇劫修行果滿方始成道。』道流!爾若道佛是究竟,緣什麼八十年後向拘尸羅城雙林樹間側臥而死去?佛今何在?明知與我生死不別。爾言三十二相、八十種好是佛,轉輪聖王應是如來,明知是幻化。古人云:『如來舉身相,為順世間情,恐人生斷見,權且立虛名。』假言三十二、八十也,空聲有身非覺體,無相乃真形。」
Worthies! What is it you are looking for? The person of no reliance who is right now listening to this Dharma is vividly clear and distinct, never lacking in anything at all. If you want to be no different from the patriarchs and buddhas, simply see it this way, and harbor no doubt or confusion. Your mind, moment after moment, is not different — this is called the living patriarch. If mind ever becomes different, then nature and characteristic become separate; because mind is not different, nature and characteristic are not separate either."
Someone asked: "What is the place where mind, moment after moment, is not different?" The master said: "The moment you try to ask about it, it has already become different — nature and characteristic have already split apart. Followers of the Way, do not make this mistake. All worldly and world-transcending dharmas alike have no fixed nature of their own, and no nature of arising either — they have only empty names, and even the names themselves are empty. You simply take these idle names as real — a great mistake. Suppose there were such a thing, it would only be a state of dependent transformation. There is a bodhi to rely on, a nirvāṇa to rely on, a liberation to rely on, three bodies to rely on, an object and a wisdom to rely on, a bodhisattva to rely on, a buddha to rely on. What are you looking for, in these lands of dependent transformation? Even the twelve divisions of the three vehicles' teachings are nothing but old paper for wiping up filth. The Buddha is an illusory, transformed body; a patriarch is simply an old monk. Were you yourself not also born of a mother? If you seek the Buddha, you are seized by the Māra of Buddha; if you seek a patriarch, you are bound by the Māra of patriarchs; whatever you seek turns to suffering — better to have nothing to do. There is a type of shave-pated monk who tells students: 'The Buddha is the ultimate; only after cultivating through three great incalculable kalpas, with the fruit fulfilled, does one finally accomplish the Way.' Followers of the Way! If you say the Buddha is the ultimate, then why, after eighty years, did he lie down on his side between the twin śāla trees at Kuśinagara and die? Where is the Buddha now? This makes it perfectly clear that his birth and death were no different from mine. You say the thirty-two marks and eighty refinements are the Buddha — then a wheel-turning sage-king would also have to be a tathāgata, which makes it obvious enough that these are only illusory transformations. The ancients said: 'The Tathāgata displays bodily marks only to accord with worldly sentiment, fearing that people would fall into the view of annihilation, and so provisionally sets up an empty name.' Even granting the thirty-two marks and eighty refinements — an empty sound, a possessed body, is not the substance of awakening; formlessness alone is the true form."
The question "what is the place where mind is not different" is answered by pointing out that the very act of asking has already introduced the difference the question worries about — a move this text repeats whenever a listener tries to convert a direct pointer into an object of further inquiry. Linji's argument against treating the historical Buddha's death at Kuśinagara as compatible with "the Buddha is the ultimate" is one of this text's few pieces of sustained doctrinal reasoning rather than shock pedagogy, closing on the formula "formlessness alone is the true form" (無相乃真形) — the same refusal of any fixed mark that runs through this site's Heart Sūtra and Diamond Sūtra alike.
4. The Buddha's True Six Supernatural Powers
「爾道佛有六通是不可思議。一切諸天、神仙、阿修羅、大力鬼亦有神通,應是佛否?道流莫錯,秖如阿修羅與天帝釋戰,戰敗領八萬四千眷屬入藕絲孔中藏。莫是聖否?如山僧所舉,皆是業通、依通。夫如佛六通者不然,入色界不被色惑、入聲界不被聲惑、入香界不被香惑、入味界不被味惑、入觸界不被觸惑、入法界不被法惑,所以達六種色、聲、香、味、觸、法皆是空相,不能繫縛。此無依道人,雖是五蘊漏質,便是地行神通。
「道流!真佛無形、真法無相,爾秖麼幻化上頭作模作樣,設求得者,皆是野狐精魅,並不是真佛,是外道見解。夫如真學道人,並不取佛、不取菩薩、羅漢、不取三界殊勝,逈無獨脫不與物拘,乾坤倒覆我更不疑,十方諸佛現前無一念心喜,三塗地獄頓現無一念心怖。緣何如此?我見諸法空相,變即有、不變即無,三界唯心、萬法唯識,所以夢幻空花何勞把捉?唯有道流目前現今聽法底人,入火不燒、入水不溺、入三塗地獄如遊園觀、入餓鬼畜生而不受報。緣何如此?無嫌底法。爾若愛聖憎凡,生死海裏沈浮。煩惱由心故有,無心煩惱何拘?不勞分別取相,自然得道須臾。爾擬傍家波波地學得,於三祇劫中終歸生死,不如無事向叢林中床角頭交脚坐。」
"You say the Buddha's six supernatural powers are inconceivable. But all the gods, immortals, asuras, and powerful ghosts also have supernatural powers — are they to be called buddhas too? Followers of the Way, do not make this mistake. Consider how, when the asuras fought the god Śakra and lost, they led their eighty-four thousand followers to hide inside a single lotus-fiber hole — could that be called sagely? What I have described are only karmic powers and dependent powers. The Buddha's six supernatural powers are not like this at all: entering the realm of form, he is not deceived by form; entering the realm of sound, he is not deceived by sound; entering the realm of smell, he is not deceived by smell; entering the realm of taste, he is not deceived by taste; entering the realm of touch, he is not deceived by touch; entering the realm of dharmas, he is not deceived by dharmas. Having penetrated the fact that these six — form, sound, smell, taste, touch, and dharmas — are all marked with emptiness, none of them can bind him. This person of no reliance, although still made of the leaking substance of the five aggregates, already possesses the supernatural power of walking the earth freely.
"Followers of the Way! The true buddha has no form; the true dharma has no mark. You go on putting on airs and postures on top of mere illusory transformation — even supposing you found something this way, it would only be a wild-fox spirit, not the true Buddha at all, but the view of a non-Buddhist. A person truly studying the Way takes hold of neither Buddha, nor bodhisattva, nor arhat, nor anything extraordinary in the three realms; utterly apart, solitary and free, he is bound by nothing at all. Let heaven and earth turn upside down — I have no more doubt; let the buddhas of the ten directions appear before me — not a single thought of joy arises; let the hells of the three evil paths appear all at once — not a single thought of fear arises. Why is this so? Because I see all dharmas as marked with emptiness: where there is change, there is existence; where there is no change, there is no existence — the three realms are mind alone, the ten thousand dharmas are consciousness alone. So why trouble yourself to grasp at a dream, an illusion, a flower in the sky? There is only the follower of the Way, right now, right in front of me, listening to this Dharma: entering fire, he is not burned; entering water, he is not drowned; entering the hells of the three evil paths, it is like strolling through a garden; entering the realms of hungry ghosts and animals, he receives no retribution. Why is this so? Because there is no dharma he rejects. If you love the sage and hate the ordinary, you will still sink and float in the sea of birth and death. Affliction exists only because of mind; with no mind, what can affliction bind? Without troubling to discriminate and grasp at marks, you attain the Way naturally, in an instant. If instead you go running from house to house, striving to learn it, you will spend three incalculable kalpas and still end up back in birth and death — better to have nothing to do, and sit cross-legged in the corner of a bed in some monastery."
Linji redefines the classical "six supernatural powers" (六通) — an Indian Buddhist list of abilities including clairvoyance and levitation — away from magical feats a god or asura could equally display, and toward something no supernatural being can claim: never being deceived by the very sense-realm one moves through. This deflationary move, treating a term of magical prestige as really naming an ordinary freedom already available in every sense-encounter, matches this text's consistent refusal to let any technical vocabulary remain a prize located somewhere else.
5. Guest and Host: A Single Encounter
「道流!如諸方有學人來,主客相見了,便有一句子語:『辨前頭善知識被學人拈出箇機權語路,向善知識口角頭攛過,看爾識不識。爾若識得是境,把得便拋向坑子裏。』學人便即尋常,然後便索善知識語,依前奪之。學人云:『上智哉,是大善知識。』即云:『爾大不識好惡。』如善知識把出箇境塊子,向學人面前弄,前人辨得下下作主,不受境惑。善知識便即現半身,學人便喝。善知識又入一切差別語路中擺撲,學人云:『不識好惡老禿奴。』善知識歎曰:『真正道流。』如諸方善知識不辨邪正,學人來問菩提涅槃三身境智,瞎老師便與他解說,被他學人罵著,便把棒打他,言:『無禮度。』自是爾善知識無眼,不得嗔他。有一般不識好惡禿奴,即指東劃西——好晴、好雨、好燈籠露柱——爾看眉毛有幾莖,這箇具機緣學人不會,便即心狂。如是之流總是野狐精、魅、魍、魎,被他好學人嗌嗌微笑,言瞎老禿奴惑亂他天下人。
「道流!出家兒且要學道,秖如山僧往日曾向毘尼中留心,亦曾於經論尋討。後方知是濟世藥表顯之說,遂乃一時拋却,即訪道參禪。後遇大善知識,方乃道眼分明,始識得天下。老和尚知其邪正,不是娘生下便會,還是體究練磨一朝自省。」
"Followers of the Way! When a student comes from somewhere and guest and host meet each other, there is a saying about it: 'Testing the good teacher standing before him, the student picks out some expedient turn of phrase and hurls it straight past the corner of the good teacher's mouth, to see whether he recognizes it or not. If the teacher recognizes it as a mere circumstance, he takes hold of it and throws it straight into a pit.' The student then acts perfectly ordinary, and afterward demands the good teacher's own words, only to snatch them away as before. The student says: 'What supreme wisdom — a truly great teacher!' whereupon the teacher says: 'You cannot tell good from bad at all.' Or the good teacher takes out some lump of a circumstance and plays with it in front of the student; the student, discerning it thoroughly, becomes master of himself and is not deceived by the circumstance. The good teacher then manifests half his body, and the student shouts. The good teacher goes on wrestling through every kind of differentiated turn of phrase, and the student says: 'You shave-pated old fool who cannot tell good from bad.' The good teacher exclaims: 'A truly genuine follower of the Way!' But when good teachers everywhere cannot discern crooked from correct, and a student comes to ask about bodhi, nirvāṇa, the three bodies, object and wisdom, the blind old teacher goes and explains it all to him; when the student then scolds him for it, the teacher picks up his staff and beats him, saying: 'How rude!' This only proves that you, the so-called good teacher, have no eyes at all — you have no right to be angry at him. There is a kind of shave-pated fool who cannot tell good from bad, who points east and gestures west, delighting in fine weather, delighting in rain — count the hairs on his eyebrows if you like — and a student with the actual capacity for this fails to understand and simply goes mad with excitement. People of this kind are nothing but wild-fox spirits, sprites and goblins, mocked with a quiet smile by any genuinely capable student, who says: this blind old fool is confusing everyone under heaven.
"Followers of the Way! Those who leave home must above all learn the Way. As for this mountain monk, I too once gave close attention to the vinaya in years past, and once searched deeply through the sūtras and treatises. Only later did I come to know that these are medicine for saving the world, statements that merely point things out, and so I cast them all aside at once and went to seek the Way and study Chan. Afterward I met a truly great teacher, and only then did my eye of the Way become clear, and I came to know the whole world for what it is. This old monk's ability to discern the crooked from the correct did not come to me from my mother's womb — it came only from investigating and training myself thoroughly, until one morning I saw for myself."
This narrated single encounter is the informal companion to the formal "fourfold guest and host" (四賓主) taxonomy Linji states outright later in this same part (Section 8 below); Zhizhao's Rentian Yanmu preserves both passages nearly verbatim, using 賓 rather than 客 for "guest" but otherwise matching this text closely enough to confirm how carefully the later tradition treated Linji's exact wording. The scene's real target is the "blind old teacher" who explains bodhi and nirvāṇa when asked, then beats the student for pointing out the failure — Linji's verdict that "this only proves you have no eyes" reads as a rare moment of the master turning his usual scrutiny of students onto careless teachers instead.
6. If You Meet the Buddha, Kill the Buddha
「道流!爾欲得如法見解,但莫受人惑,向裏向外逢著便殺——逢佛殺佛、逢祖殺祖、逢羅漢殺羅漢、逢父母殺父母、逢親眷殺親眷——始得解脫。不與物拘,透脫自在,如諸方學道流未有不依物出來底。山僧向此間從頭打、手上出來手上打、口裏出來口裏打、眼裏出來眼裏打,未有一箇獨脫出來底,皆是上他古人閑機境。山僧無一法與人,秖是治病解縛。爾諸方道流試不依物出來,我要共爾商量。十年五歲並無一人,皆是依草、附葉、竹木、精靈、野狐精魅,向一切糞塊上亂咬瞎漢,枉消他十方信施,道我是出家兒,作如是見解,向爾道:『無佛、無法、無修、無證,秖與麼傍家擬求什麼物?』瞎漢頭上安頭,是爾欠少什麼。
「道流!是爾目前用底與祖佛不別,秖麼不信,便向外求。莫錯,向外無法、內亦不可得。爾取山僧口裏語,不如休歇無事去。已起者莫續、未起者不要放起,便勝爾十年行脚。約山僧見處無如許多般,秖是平常著衣、喫飯、無事過時。爾諸方來者皆是有心求佛、求法、求解脫、求出離三界。癡人!爾要出三界,什麼處去?佛祖是賞繫底名句。」
"Followers of the Way! If you want a true and correct understanding, you need only not be deceived by others: whatever you meet, inside or outside, kill it at once — meet the Buddha, kill the Buddha; meet a patriarch, kill the patriarch; meet an arhat, kill the arhat; meet your father or mother, kill your father or mother; meet your relatives, kill your relatives — only then do you attain liberation. Bound by no external thing, you pass through and are free — thoroughly free and at ease. Yet everywhere I look, students of the Way come forward always depending on some external thing. This mountain monk strikes at the very source: whatever comes out through the hands, I strike at the hands; whatever comes out through the mouth, I strike at the mouth; whatever comes out through the eyes, I strike at the eyes. There has never been a single one who came forward truly free and independent — every one of them is still climbing onto the idle devices of the ancients. This mountain monk has not one single dharma to give anyone; I only treat sickness and untie bonds. You students of the Way everywhere, try coming forward without depending on any external thing at all, and I will discuss it with you. In ten years, in five years, there has not been a single one — every one of them depends on grass, clings to leaves, on bamboo and wood, on spirits, on wild-fox demons, biting blindly at every lump of dung, wasting the alms given in good faith by donors in every direction, calling themselves home-leavers while holding views exactly like this. To you I say: 'There is no Buddha, no Dharma, no cultivation, no realization — so what exactly are you running from house to house trying to find?' Blind fools, placing one head on top of the head you already have — what is it you actually lack?
"Followers of the Way! What you are using right in front of me now is no different from the patriarchs and buddhas — it is only because you do not believe this that you go seeking outside. Do not make this mistake: there is no dharma outside, and nothing can be found within either. Rather than clinging to the words out of this mountain monk's mouth, it would be better for you to rest and go about with nothing to do. Do not let what has already arisen continue, and do not let what has not yet arisen start up — this alone surpasses ten years of pilgrimage on foot. As I see it, there is nothing so elaborate as all that — it is simply wearing your clothes, eating your food, and passing the time with nothing to do. Yet all of you who come here from every direction have a mind set on seeking the Buddha, seeking the Dharma, seeking liberation, seeking to escape the three realms. Fools! If you want to leave the three realms, where would you go? 'Buddha' and 'patriarch' are only names and phrases used to reward and bind you."
Read in its own context, "kill" here is glossed by Linji himself in the very next breath: this mountain monk "has not one single dharma to give anyone," and the killing is aimed at whatever a student depends on — an external authority, a borrowed word, an idle device inherited from "the ancients" — never at the Buddha, one's actual parents, or any literal target. Linji names his own method just as plainly: "I only treat sickness and untie bonds" (治病解縛), the same medicine-for-a-particular-illness image used throughout this text. The line's fame has often detached it from this immediate qualification; this collection's translation keeps the two sentences on the same page deliberately, so the explanation is never more than a breath away from the provocation.
7. The Furniture Already in Your Own House
「爾欲識三界麼?不離爾今聽法底心地。爾一念心貪是欲界、爾一念心瞋是色界、爾一念心癡是無色界,是爾屋裏家具子。三界不自道:『我是三界。』還是,道流!目前靈靈地照燭萬般酌度世界底人與三界安名。大德!四大色身是無常,乃至脾、胃、肝、膽、髮、毛、爪、齒,唯見諸法空相。爾一念心歇得處,喚作菩提樹;爾一念心不能歇得處,喚作無明樹。無明無住處、無明無始終,爾若念念心歇不得,便上他無明樹,便入六道、四生、披毛、戴角;爾若歇得,便是清淨身界。爾一念不生,便是上菩提樹,三界神通變化意生化身,法喜禪悅身光自照,思衣羅綺千重、思食百味具足,更無橫病。菩提無住處,是故無得者。
「道流!大丈夫漢更疑箇什麼?目前用處更是阿誰把得便用,莫著名字,號為玄旨,與麼見得勿嫌底法。古人云:『心隨萬境轉,轉處實能幽,隨流認得性,無喜亦無憂。』」
"Do you want to recognize the three realms? They are not apart from the ground of mind that is right now listening to this Dharma. A single thought of craving in your mind is the desire realm; a single thought of anger in your mind is the form realm; a single thought of delusion in your mind is the formless realm — these are simply furniture already sitting in your own house. The three realms do not announce of themselves, 'We are the three realms.' Rather, followers of the Way, it is you — vividly, luminously illuminating everything, weighing and judging the whole world right in front of you — who fix the name 'the three realms' upon them. Worthies! This physical body of the four great elements is impermanent — down to the spleen, stomach, liver, gallbladder, hair, nails, and teeth — and in it there is only to be seen the empty mark of all dharmas. The place where a single thought of your mind comes to rest is called the Bodhi Tree; the place where a single thought of your mind cannot come to rest is called the Tree of Ignorance. Ignorance has no fixed dwelling place, and ignorance has no beginning or end; if you cannot bring your thoughts to rest, moment after moment, you climb up onto this Tree of Ignorance, entering the six paths and the four modes of birth, wearing fur and bearing horns; if you can bring them to rest, this is itself the realm of a pure body. The instant not a single thought arises in you, you have climbed the Bodhi Tree, with supernatural transformation throughout the three realms, a mind-made body arising at will, the joy of the Dharma and the bliss of meditation shining from your own body's light — thinking of clothing, a thousand layers of fine silk appear; thinking of food, a hundred flavors stand complete — with no further affliction of any kind. Bodhi has no fixed dwelling place, and for this reason there is no one who attains it.
"Followers of the Way! What is there left for a great man to doubt? Whoever it is that, right now, seizes hold of this activity in front of you and simply uses it — do not attach any name to it; call it, if you must, the mysterious purport. See it this way, and there is not a single dharma left to reject. The ancients said: 'Mind turns along with ten thousand circumstances, and the turning place is truly subtle and hidden; follow the flow and recognize your own nature, and there is neither joy nor sorrow.'"
Relocating the three realms of Buddhist cosmology — desire, form, and formlessness, which structure the entire traditional map of saṃsāra — as "furniture already sitting in your own house," identical with craving, anger, and delusion in a single present thought, is this text's most compact statement of a method used throughout: every external cosmological or doctrinal category is folded back into what is happening in this mind, right now. The closing verse, attributed simply to "the ancients," is widely quoted elsewhere in Chan literature as a saying of the Third Patriarch Sengcan, traditional author of this site's own Xinxin Ming — a direct thread connecting Linji's teaching back to the earliest surviving Chan poem on this site.
8. The Fourfold Guest and Host
「道流!如禪宗見解死活循然,參學之人大須子細,如主客相見便有言論往來,或應物現形、或全體作用、或把機權喜怒、或現半身、或乘師子、或乘象王。如有真正學人便喝,先拈出一箇膠盆子。善知識不辨是境,便上他境上作模作樣。學人便喝,前人不肯放。此是膏肓之病不堪醫,喚作客看主。或是善知識不拈出物,隨學人問處即奪。學人被奪抵死不放,此是主看客。或有學人應一箇清淨境出善知識前,善知識辨得是境,把得拋向坑裏。學人言:『大好善知識。』即云:『咄哉,不識好惡。』學人便禮拜,此喚作主看主。或有學人披枷帶鎖出善知識前,善知識更與安一重枷鎖,學人歡喜。彼此不辨,呼為客看客。大德!山僧如是所舉,皆是辨魔揀異,知其邪正。」
"Followers of the Way! In the Chan school's own way of seeing, life and death follow their own logic, and students must be extremely careful about this. When host and guest meet, there is bound to be an exchange of words back and forth — sometimes responding to a thing by manifesting a corresponding form, sometimes acting with the whole body at once, sometimes seizing an expedient occasion of joy or anger, sometimes manifesting half a body, sometimes riding a lion, sometimes riding an elephant king. Suppose a truly genuine student comes forward and shouts, first holding out a kind of glue-basin. If the good teacher fails to recognize this as a mere circumstance, and goes and puts on airs and postures right on top of it, the student shouts again, and the first party refuses to let go — this is an illness gone beyond cure, called 'the guest sees through the host.' Or the good teacher offers nothing out at all, and simply seizes whatever the student raises in his question; the student, seized, clings on for dear life and will not let go — this is called 'the host sees through the guest.' Or a student presents some pure circumstance before the good teacher, and the good teacher, recognizing it as a mere circumstance, seizes it and throws it straight into a pit; the student says, 'What a wonderful good teacher,' and the teacher replies, 'Bah! You cannot tell good from bad at all' — and the student then bows, and this is called 'the host sees through the host.' Or a student comes before the good teacher wearing a cangue and shackles, and the good teacher fastens yet another layer of cangue and shackles onto him, and the student is delighted — neither one able to discern the other — and this is called 'the guest looks upon the guest.' Worthies! Everything this mountain monk has set out here is for the sake of discerning Māra and telling apart what differs, so as to know the crooked from the correct."
This is the formal statement of what later tradition calls "the four kinds of guest and host" (四賓主), preserved almost word for word — with 賓 in place of 客 for "guest" — in Zhizhao's Rentian Yanmu (T2006), which treats it as one of five essential pillars of Linji-house doctrine alongside the three statements, three mysteries and essentials, four shouts, and the earlier fourfold scheme of taking away. All four outcomes here describe a failure to discern, not a success: only "the guest sees through the host" is named an incurable illness outright, but none of the other three positions is offered as the goal either — the entire point of laying out four ways an encounter can go wrong is to train the eye that can catch each one as it happens, a skill this text never claims can be taught by the scheme itself, only pointed at by it.
Part 3 Complete
This closes Part 3. Part 4 completes the long evening instruction to the assembly with two of this text's most vivid teaching devices — Linji's own account of "changing his robes" in front of confused students, and the great catalogue of "true buddha, true dharma, true way" that closes with his own testimony about what he learned, and did not learn, from years spent studying the vinaya and the sūtras before he ever met a genuine teacher.