Part 5 of 40 · Fascicle 5 · 如來性品第四之二 · 大般涅槃經 T0374 (Northern Edition)

The Many Marks of True Liberation

Kāśyapa returns to the question of secrecy — if the Buddha truly hides nothing, why call anything a treasury at all? — and the sūtra answers with the same half-letter parable used in the previous fascicle, before Kāśyapa presses a harder case: the icchantika, here named outright as the one being the Tathāgata, as physician to the whole of Jambudvīpa, cannot cure. The fascicle's centerpiece is an extended litany — dozens of named marks of what true liberation is, each one in turn declared identical to the Tathāgata himself — followed by a sharp philosophical coda on whether an attempted killing that cannot possibly succeed still carries the weight of the intent behind it.

Translator: Ru-Yi Meditation Center Status: Part 5 of 40 Source: Taishō T0374, 大般涅槃經 (tr. Dharmakṣema, 421 CE) Reading notes after Huiyuan's 大般涅槃經義記 (T1764)

No Secrets, Only What Cannot Yet Be Understood

Chinese Source

爾時迦葉菩薩白佛言:「世尊!如佛所說,諸佛世尊有祕密藏。是義不然。何以故?諸佛世尊唯有密語,無有密藏。譬如幻主,機關、木人,人雖覩見屈伸俯仰,莫知其內而使之然。佛法不爾,咸令眾生悉得知見,云何當言諸佛世尊有祕密藏?」

佛讚迦葉:「善哉,善哉!善男子!如汝所言,如來實無祕密之藏。何以故?如秋滿月,處空顯露,清淨無翳,人皆覩見。如來之言,亦復如是,開發顯露,清淨無翳。愚人不解,謂之祕藏,智者了達,則不名藏。善男子!譬如有人,多積金銀至無量億,其心慳悋,不肯惠施拯濟貧窮,如是積聚乃名祕藏。如來不爾,於無邊劫積聚無量妙法珍寶,心無慳悋,常以惠施一切眾生,云何當言如來祕藏?善男子!譬如有人身根不具,或無一目、一手、一足,以羞恥故,不令人見,人不見故,名為祕藏。如來不爾,所有正法,具足無缺,令人覩見,云何當言如來祕藏?善男子!譬如貧人,多負人財,怖畏債主,隱不欲現,故名為藏。如來不爾,不負一切眾生世法,雖負眾生出世之法而亦不藏。何以故?恒於眾生,生一子想,而為演說無上法故。善男子!譬如長者,多有財寶,唯有一子,心甚愛重,情無捨離,所有珍寶悉用示之。如來亦爾,視諸眾生同於一子。」

「善男子!假使長者教半字已,是兒即時能得了知毘伽羅論不?」「不也。世尊!」「如是長者,於是子所,有祕藏不?」「不也。世尊!何以故?以子年幼,故不為說;不以祕故,悋而不說。所以者何?若有嫉妬祕悋之心,乃名為藏。如來不爾,云何當言如來祕藏?」佛言:「善哉,善哉!善男子!如汝所言。若有瞋心、嫉妬慳悋,乃名為藏;如來無有瞋心、嫉妬,云何名藏?善男子!彼大長者謂如來也,所言一子者,謂一切眾生。如來視於一切眾生猶如一子,教一子者謂聲聞弟子,半字者謂九部經,毘伽羅論者所謂方等大乘經典。以諸聲聞無有慧力,是故如來為說半字九部經典,而不為說毘伽羅論方等大乘。善男子!如彼長者,子既長大,堪任讀學,若不為說毘伽羅論,可名為藏。若諸聲聞有堪任力,能受大乘毘伽羅論,如來祕惜不為說者,可言如來有祕密藏。如來不爾,是故如來無有祕藏。如彼長者教半字已,次為演說毘伽羅論;我今亦爾,為諸弟子說於半字九部經已,次為演說毘伽羅論,所謂如來常存不變。」

「復次善男子!譬如夏月,興大雲雷、降注大雨,令諸農夫下種之者多獲果實。不下種者,無所剋獲,無所獲者,非龍王咎。而此龍王亦無所藏。我今如來,亦復如是,降大法雨大涅槃經,若諸眾生,種善子者,得慧芽果。無善子者,則無所獲。無所獲者,非如來咎;然佛如來,實無所藏。」

Ru-Yi Translation

The bodhisattva Kāśyapa then said to the Buddha: "World-Honored One, the Buddha has said that every buddha, every World-Honored One, has a secret treasury — but this cannot be right. Why is this? Every buddha, every World-Honored One, has only speech that is hard to fathom, not a treasury that is kept hidden. It is like a puppet-master's mechanical wooden figures: people see them bend, stretch, bow, and rise, yet have no idea what makes them move as they do. The Buddha's own teaching is not like this — it causes every being to know and see it fully. How, then, can it be said that every buddha, every World-Honored One, has a secret treasury?"

The Buddha praised Kāśyapa: "Excellent, excellent, good son! Just as you have said, the Tathāgata truly has no secret treasury at all. Why is this? It is like the full moon in autumn, hanging exposed in open sky, pure and unclouded, seen fully by everyone. The Tathāgata's own words are just the same: laid open and fully exposed, pure and unclouded. It is only the foolish who fail to understand this, and so call it a secret treasury — those who understand it fully would never call it a treasury at all. Good son, it is like a person who has amassed gold and silver to the value of countless millions, but is so miserly at heart that he refuses to give any of it away to rescue the poor — a hoard of this kind is rightly called a secret treasury. The Tathāgata is not like this: throughout boundless kalpas he has amassed a treasure of immeasurable, wondrous dharmas, yet his heart holds no miserliness at all, and he constantly gives it freely to every being — how, then, could this be called the Tathāgata's secret treasury? Good son, it is like a person whose body is missing some faculty — perhaps an eye, a hand, or a foot — who, out of shame, will not let others see it, and it is precisely because others cannot see it that it is called hidden. The Tathāgata is not like this: the whole of the true Dharma he possesses is complete, without any lack, and is shown fully for people to see — how, then, could this be called the Tathāgata's secret treasury? Good son, it is like a poor man deeply in debt to others, who, fearing his creditors, hides himself away and refuses to appear — this is why it is called hidden. The Tathāgata is not like this: he owes no worldly debt to any being at all; though he may be said to owe beings a debt of the transcendent Dharma, even this he does not hide away. Why is this? Because he constantly regards every being as his own single child, and expounds the peerless Dharma for their sake. Good son, it is like an elder who has great wealth but only a single son, whom he cherishes and loves so deeply that he could never bear to part with him, and shows this son every one of his treasures without exception. The Tathāgata is just the same: he regards every being as though each were his own single child."

"Good son, suppose an elder has taught his son the half-letters — will that child then immediately be able to understand the full grammar of the Vyākaraṇa treatise?" "No, World-Honored One." "Does this elder, then, keep some secret treasury from his son?" "No, World-Honored One. Why is this? It is because the child is still young that the father does not yet teach him the full grammar — not because he withholds it out of secrecy or stinginess. Why is this so? Because it is only a mind of jealousy and miserly withholding that could rightly be called keeping a treasury — the Tathāgata is not like this. How, then, could this be called the Tathāgata's secret treasury?" The Buddha said: "Excellent, excellent, good son! Just as you have said. It is only a mind of anger, jealousy, and miserliness that could rightly be called keeping a treasury; the Tathāgata has no anger or jealousy at all — how, then, could this be called keeping a treasury? Good son, that great elder stands for the Tathāgata, and the single son spoken of stands for every being. The Tathāgata regards every being as though each were his own single child; teaching this one child stands for teaching the śrāvaka disciples; the half-letters stand for the ninefold scriptures; and the full grammar of the Vyākaraṇa treatise stands for the scriptures of the Great Vehicle's own vast, expansive teaching. Because the śrāvakas do not yet have the strength of wisdom for it, the Tathāgata teaches them the half-letters of the ninefold scriptures, and does not yet teach them the full grammar of the Great Vehicle's vast teaching. Good son, it is like that elder's son: once he has grown up and is capable of further study, if the father still refuses to teach him the full grammar, this could rightly be called keeping something hidden. If the śrāvakas were already capable of receiving the Great Vehicle's full grammar, and the Tathāgata withheld it out of secrecy and refused to teach it, this could rightly be called the Tathāgata's having a secret treasury. The Tathāgata is not like this, and so the Tathāgata has no secret treasury at all. Just as that elder, having taught the half-letters, goes on next to teach the full grammar, I am just the same: having taught my disciples the half-letters of the ninefold scriptures, I now go on to teach them the full grammar — namely, that the Tathāgata abides permanently, without change."

"Furthermore, good son, it is like the summer months, when great clouds gather and thunder rolls, and heavy rain pours down: farmers who have sown their seed reap an abundant harvest, while those who have not sown gain nothing at all — and this failure to gain anything is no fault of the dragon-king who sent the rain, nor does that dragon-king keep anything hidden either. The Tathāgata is just the same: I now cause the great rain of the Dharma to fall as this great nirvāṇa sūtra; beings who have planted good seeds obtain the fruit of wisdom's sprout, while those without good seeds gain nothing at all — and this is no fault of the Tathāgata's; the Buddha, the Tathāgata, truly keeps nothing hidden at all."

The Verse for a Grieving King

Chinese Source

迦葉復言:「我今定知如來、世尊無所祕藏。如佛所說毘伽羅論,謂佛如來常存不變,是義不然。何以故?佛昔說偈:「『諸佛與緣覺, 及以弟子眾,猶捨無常身, 何況諸凡夫?』「今者乃說:『常存無變。』是義云何?」

佛言:「善男子!我為一切聲聞弟子,教半字故而說是偈。善男子!波斯匿王其母命終,悲號戀慕不能自勝,來至我所,我即問言:『大王!何故悲苦懊惱乃至於此?』王言:『世尊!國大夫人,是日命終,假使有能令我母命還如本者,我當捨國、象馬、七珍及以身命,悉以賞之。』我復語言:『大王!且莫愁惱,憂悲啼哭,一切眾生壽命盡者,名之為死。諸佛緣覺、聲聞弟子,尚捨此身,況復凡夫?』善男子!我為波斯匿王教半字故,而說是偈。我今為諸聲聞弟子說毘伽羅論,謂如來常存,無有變易。若有人言如來無常,云何是人舌不墮落?」

Ru-Yi Translation

Kāśyapa said further: "I now truly understand that the Tathāgata, the World-Honored One, keeps nothing hidden at all. But what the Buddha calls the 'full grammar' — that the Buddha, the Tathāgata, abides permanently, without change — this cannot be right. Why is this? The Buddha once spoke this verse:

'The buddhas, and the pratyekabuddhas,
and the assembly of their disciples,
all relinquish this impermanent body —
how much more so, then, an ordinary person?'

"Yet now you say: 'He abides permanently, without change.' What does this mean?"

The Buddha said: "Good son, I spoke that verse for the sake of teaching the half-letters to all my śrāvaka disciples. Good son, when King Prasenajit's own mother passed away, he was so overcome with grief and longing that he could not compose himself, and came to where I was. I asked him: 'Great king, why are you so sorrowful and distressed as this?' The king said: 'World-Honored One, the great lady of the kingdom passed away just this day; were there anyone able to restore my mother's life exactly as it was before, I would give up my whole kingdom, my elephants and horses, my seven kinds of treasure, and even my own life, and grant it all to that person.' I said to him further: 'Great king, do not give way to such sorrow, grief, and lamentation — whenever any being's life comes to its end, this is called death. Even the buddhas, the pratyekabuddhas, and the śrāvaka disciples still relinquish this body — how much more so, then, an ordinary person?' Good son, it was for King Prasenajit's sake, in order to teach him the half-letters, that I spoke that verse. What I now teach my śrāvaka disciples is the full grammar — that the Tathāgata abides permanently, without any change. Should anyone now say the Tathāgata is impermanent, how could that person's own tongue not fall out for saying it?"

Which of Us Has No Accumulation — and What the Icchantika Cannot Yet Reach

Chinese Source

迦葉復言:「如佛所說:「『無所聚積, 於食知足。 如鳥飛空, 跡不可尋。』「是義云何?世尊!於此眾中,誰得名為無所積聚?誰復得名於食知足?誰行於空跡不可尋?而此去者為至何方?」

佛言:「迦葉!夫積聚者,名曰財寶。善男子!積聚有二種:一者有為、二者無為。有為積聚者即聲聞行,無為積聚者即如來行。善男子!僧亦有二種:有為、無為。有為僧者名曰聲聞,聲聞僧者無有積聚,所謂奴婢非法之物,庫藏穀米、鹽豉胡麻、大小諸豆。若有說言如來聽畜奴婢、僕使如是之物,舌則卷縮。我諸所有聲聞弟子,名無積聚,亦得名為於食知足。若有貪食,名不知足。不貪食者,是名知足。跡難尋者,則近無上菩提之道,我說是人雖去無至。」

迦葉復言:「若有為僧,尚無積聚,況無為僧?無為僧者,即是如來,如來云何當有積聚?夫積聚者,名為藏匿,是故如來凡有所說,無所悋惜,云何名藏?跡不可尋者所謂涅槃,涅槃之中無有日月、星辰、諸宿、寒熱風雨、生老病死、二十五有,離諸憂苦及諸煩惱,如是涅槃,如來住處,常不變易,以是因緣,如來至是娑羅樹間,於大涅槃而般涅槃。」

佛告迦葉:「所言大者,其性廣博。猶如有人壽命無量,名大丈夫。是人若能安住正法,名人中勝。如我所說八大人覺,為一人有?為多人有?若一人具八,則為最勝。所言涅槃者,無諸瘡疣。善男子!譬如有人為毒箭所射,多受苦痛;值遇良醫,為拔毒箭,傅以妙藥,令其離苦,得受安樂。是醫即便遊於城邑及諸聚落,隨有患苦、瘡疣之處,即往其所,為療眾苦。善男子!如來亦爾,成等正覺,為大醫王,見閻浮提苦惱眾生,無量劫中被婬、怒、癡、煩惱毒箭,受大苦切。為如是等,說大乘經甘露法藥,療治此已,復至他方有諸煩惱毒箭之處,示現作佛,為其療治,是故名曰大般涅槃。大般涅槃者名解脫處,隨有調伏眾生之處,如來於中而作示現,以是真實甚深義故,名大涅槃。」

迦葉菩薩復白佛言:「世尊!世間醫師,悉能療治一切眾生瘡疣病不?」「善男子!世間瘡疣,凡有二種:一者可治,二不可治。凡可治者,醫則能治。不可治者,則不能治。」

迦葉復言:「如佛言者,如來則為於閻浮提治眾生已。若言治已,是諸眾生,其中云何復有未能得涅槃者?若未悉得,云何如來說言治竟,欲至他方?」「善男子!閻浮提內眾生有二:一者有信,二者無信。有信之人,則名可治。何以故?定得涅槃,無瘡疣故,是故我說治閻浮提諸眾生已。無信之人,名一闡提,一闡提者,名不可治。除一闡提,餘悉治已,是故涅槃,名無瘡疣。」

Ru-Yi Translation

Kāśyapa said further: "The Buddha has said:

'Without any accumulation at all,
content with whatever food one has —
like a bird flying through open sky,
whose track can never be traced.'

"What does this mean, World-Honored One? Among this very assembly, who can rightly be said to have no accumulation at all? Who can be said to be content with whatever food they have? Who moves through open sky, leaving no track to be traced — and to what place does such a one go?"

The Buddha said: "Kāśyapa, accumulation refers to wealth and possessions. Good son, there are two kinds of accumulation: the conditioned and the unconditioned. Conditioned accumulation belongs to the conduct of the śrāvakas; unconditioned accumulation belongs to the conduct of the Tathāgata. Good son, there are likewise two kinds of saṅgha: the conditioned and the unconditioned. The conditioned saṅgha is called the śrāvaka saṅgha, and this śrāvaka saṅgha holds no accumulation — namely, no servants or other improper possessions, no storehouses of grain, salt, fermented beans, sesame, or beans of any size. Should anyone say that the Tathāgata permits monks to keep servants, attendants, or possessions of this kind, that person's own tongue should shrivel up for saying it. All my śrāvaka disciples are said to have no accumulation, and can likewise be said to be content with whatever food they have. Whoever craves food is said not to be content; whoever does not crave food is said to be content. Whoever leaves a track hard to trace has already drawn near the path of unsurpassed awakening — such a person, I say, though they depart, arrive nowhere at all."

Kāśyapa said further: "If even the conditioned saṅgha has no accumulation, how much more the unconditioned saṅgha? The unconditioned saṅgha is itself the Tathāgata — how, then, could the Tathāgata have any accumulation at all? Accumulation means hoarding something hidden away, and this is precisely why the Tathāgata, in whatever he teaches, holds nothing back at all — how, then, could this be called a treasury? The track that cannot be traced is nirvāṇa itself — within nirvāṇa there is no sun or moon, no stars or constellations, no cold or heat, no wind or rain, no birth, old age, sickness, or death, none of the twenty-five states of existence, and it is free of every sorrow, every suffering, and every affliction. This very nirvāṇa is the Tathāgata's own abode, forever unchanging — and it is for this very reason that the Tathāgata has come here, among these sāla trees, to enter this great nirvāṇa, into parinirvāṇa itself."

The Buddha said to Kāśyapa: "The word 'great' here means vast and expansive in nature — it is like a person of immeasurable life, called a great man. If such a person is able to abide securely in the true Dharma, he is called foremost among people. Consider the eight awakenings of a great person I have taught elsewhere — are they possessed by only a single person, or by many? If a single person possesses all eight in full, that person is the most excellent of all. As for the word 'nirvāṇa,' it means free of every wound and blemish. Good son, it is like a person struck by a poisoned arrow, suffering greatly, who then encounters a skilled physician, who draws out the arrow and applies fine medicine, freeing him from suffering and bringing him ease. This physician then travels through every city and village, and wherever there is affliction, a wound, or a blemish, goes there at once to heal every suffering. Good son, the Tathāgata is just the same: having accomplished perfect awakening, he is a great king of physicians, and, seeing the suffering beings of Jambudvīpa, struck throughout immeasurable kalpas by the poisoned arrows of lust, anger, and delusion, enduring the greatest suffering — for their sake, he teaches the nectar-medicine of the Great Vehicle's own scriptures. Having healed them here, he then goes to other lands where beings are likewise struck by the poisoned arrows of affliction, and there manifests as a buddha, healing them in turn — and this is why he is called the great parinirvāṇa. This great parinirvāṇa is called the place of liberation, and wherever there are beings to be tamed and guided, the Tathāgata manifests himself there — and it is for this true and profound meaning that it is called the great nirvāṇa."

The bodhisattva Kāśyapa said again to the Buddha: "World-Honored One, are worldly physicians able to heal every wound and blemish of every being?" "Good son, worldly wounds and blemishes are of two kinds: those that can be healed, and those that cannot. Whatever can be healed, a physician is able to heal; whatever cannot be healed, a physician cannot heal."

Kāśyapa said further: "As the Buddha has said, the Tathāgata has already healed the beings of Jambudvīpa — but if they have already been healed, why is it that some among them still have not yet attained nirvāṇa? And if they have not all attained it, how can the Tathāgata say his healing here is complete, and that he now wishes to go elsewhere?" "Good son, the beings within Jambudvīpa are of two kinds: those with faith, and those without faith. Those with faith are said to be curable. Why is this? Because they are certain to attain nirvāṇa, free of every wound and blemish — this is why I say my healing of the beings of Jambudvīpa is complete. Those without faith are called icchantikas, and the icchantika is said to be incurable. Except for the icchantika, every other being has already been healed — and this is why nirvāṇa is said to be free of every wound and blemish."

Reading note — Ru-Yi Meditation Center

This is the sūtra's plainest statement yet on the icchantika — flatly named "incurable," the one exception carved out of an otherwise universal healing — and it stands in evident tension with the previous fascicle's claim that the Buddha himself "manifests as an icchantika" while never truly being one. No surviving portion of Huiyuan's commentary consulted for this collection glosses this specific passage, so this note is offered as original commentary. Read against Part 4's manifestation catalog, one resolution suggests itself: the "incurability" named here describes the icchantika's present, ongoing refusal of faith — a condition, not a metaphysical sentence — since a condition by definition can still change, whereas what has already changed (as the Buddha's own icchantika-manifestation elsewhere shows is fully possible) was never permanently fixed in the first place. Whether this sūtra ultimately settles on "incurable" as a statement about present fact or unchangeable essence is exactly the question the fifth-century monk Zhu Daosheng staked his career on, arguing for the former against the near-unanimous consensus of his contemporaries before a more complete version of this sūtra vindicated him. Readers should hold this passage's blunt language loosely until later fascicles — especially 如來性品's remaining parts and the material Bao Liang's Compilation (T1763) preserves of Daosheng's own reasoning — take the question up directly.

Is Liberation Form, or Formless?

Chinese Source

「世尊,何等名涅槃?」「善男子!夫涅槃者,名為解脫。」迦葉復言:「所言解脫,為是色耶?為非色乎?」佛言:「善男子!或有是色,或非是色。言非色者,即是聲聞緣覺解脫。言是色者,即是諸佛如來解脫。善男子!是故解脫亦色、非色。如來為諸聲聞弟子說為非色。」

「世尊!聲聞緣覺若非色者,云何得住?」「善男子!如非想非非想天,亦色非色,我亦說為非色。若人難言:『非想非非想天若非色者,云何得住、去來、進止?』如是之義,諸佛境界,非諸聲聞緣覺所知。解脫亦爾,亦色非色說為非色,亦想非想說為非想,如是之義諸佛境界,非諸聲聞緣覺所知。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"World-Honored One, what is meant by nirvāṇa?" "Good son, nirvāṇa itself means liberation." Kāśyapa said further: "Is this liberation something with form, or something without form?" The Buddha said: "Good son, in one sense it has form, and in another sense it does not. What is without form is the liberation of the śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas; what has form is the liberation of every buddha, every Tathāgata. Good son, liberation is therefore both with form and without form — but the Tathāgata, for the sake of his śrāvaka disciples, teaches it as without form."

"World-Honored One, if the liberation of the śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas is without form, how can it abide anywhere at all?" "Good son, it is like the heaven of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, which is likewise both with form and without form, though I also teach it as without form. Should someone object: 'If the heaven of neither-perception-nor-non-perception is without form, how can it abide, come and go, advance and rest?' — such a matter belongs to the domain of the buddhas alone, and is not known to any śrāvaka or pratyekabuddha. Liberation is just the same: it is both with form and without form, and is taught as without form; it is both with perception and without perception, and is taught as without perception — such a matter belongs to the domain of the buddhas alone, and is not known to any śrāvaka or pratyekabuddha."

The Many Marks of True Liberation

Chinese Source

爾時迦葉菩薩復白佛言:「世尊!唯願哀愍,重垂廣說,大涅槃行解脫之義。」佛讚迦葉:「善哉,善哉!善男子!真解脫者,名曰遠離一切繫縛。若真解脫離諸繫縛,則無有生,亦無和合。譬如父母和合生子,真解脫者則不如是,是故解脫名曰不生。迦葉!譬如醍醐其性清淨。如來亦爾,非因父母和合而生,其性清淨。所以示現有父母者,為欲化度諸眾生故。真解脫者即是如來,如來解脫無二無別。譬如春月下諸種子,得煖氣已尋便出生;真解脫者則不如是。又解脫者名曰虛無,虛無即是解脫,解脫即是如來,如來即是虛無、非作所作。凡是作者,猶如城郭、樓觀、却敵;真解脫者則不如是,是故解脫即是如來。又解脫者即無為法,譬如陶師,作已還破,解脫不爾,真解脫者不生不滅,是故解脫即是如來。如來亦爾,不生不滅、不老不死、不破不壞、非有為法,以是義故,名曰如來入大涅槃。不老不死有何等義?老者名為遷變,髮白面皺;死者身壞命終。如是等法,解脫中無;以無是事,故名解脫。如來亦無髮白、面皺、有為之法,是故如來無有老也;無有老故,則無有死。又解脫者名曰無病,所謂病者,四百四病及餘外來侵損身者,是處無故,故名解脫。無疾病者,即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來,如來無病,是故法身亦無有病,如是無病,即是如來。死者名曰身壞命終;是處無死,即是甘露,是甘露者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。如來成就如是功德,云何當言如來無常?若言無常,無有是處。是金剛身,云何無常?是故如來不名命終。如來清淨,無有垢穢,如來之身非胎所污,如分陀利,本性清淨。如來解脫亦復如是,如是解脫,即是如來,是故如來清淨無垢。又解脫者,諸漏瘡疣永無遺餘,如來亦爾,無有一切諸漏瘡疣。又解脫者無有鬪諍,譬如飢人,見他飲食,生貪奪想,解脫不爾。又解脫者名曰安靜,凡夫人言,夫安靜者謂摩醯首羅,如是之言即是虛妄。真安靜者畢竟解脫,畢竟解脫即是如來。又解脫者名曰安隱,如多賊處不名安隱,清夷之處乃名安隱。是解脫中無有怖畏,故名安隱,是故安隱即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來,如來者即是法也。又解脫者,無有等侶,有等侶者,如有國王有隣國等。夫解脫者則無如是,無等侶者謂轉輪聖王,無有能與作齊等者。解脫亦爾,無有等侶,無等侶者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來、轉法輪王,是故如來無有等侶,有等侶者無有是處。又解脫者名無憂愁,有憂愁者譬如國王畏難強隣,而生憂愁。夫解脫者則無是事,譬如壞怨,則無憂慮,解脫亦爾,是無憂畏,無憂畏者,即是如來。又解脫者,名無憂喜,譬如女人,只有一子,從役遠行,卒得凶問,聞之愁苦,後復聞活,便生歡喜。夫解脫中,無如是事,無憂喜者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者無有塵垢,譬如春月,日沒之後,風起塵霧。夫解脫中無如是事,無塵霧者喻真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。譬如聖王髻中明珠,無有垢穢。夫解脫性亦復如是,無有垢穢,無垢穢者喻真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。如真金性,不雜沙石,乃名真寶,有人得之生於財想。夫解脫性,亦復如是,如彼真寶,彼真寶者喻真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。譬如瓦瓶,破而聲㽄,金剛寶瓶,則不如是。夫解脫者亦無㽄破,金剛寶瓶喻真解脫,真解脫者即是如來,是故如來身不可壞。其聲㽄者,如蜱麻子,盛熱之時,置之日曝,出聲震爆。夫解脫者無如是事,如彼金剛真寶之瓶,無㽄破聲,假使無量百千之人悉共射之,無能壞者,無㽄破聲喻真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。如貧窮人負他物故,為他所繫,枷鎖策罰,受諸苦毒。夫解脫中無如是事,無有負債,猶如長者多有財寶無量億數,勢力自在,不負他物。夫解脫者亦復如是,多有無量法財珍寶,勢力自在,無所負也,無所負者喻真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名無逼切,如春涉熱,夏日食甜,冬日冷觸。真解脫中無有如是不適意事,無逼切者喻真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。

「又無逼切者,譬如有人飽食魚肉,而復飲乳,是人則為近死不久。真解脫中無如是事,是人若得甘露良藥,所患得除。真解脫者亦復如是,甘露良藥喻真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。云何逼切、不逼切耶?譬如凡夫,我慢自高,而作是念:『一切眾中誰能害我?』即便携持蛇虎毒虫,當知是人不盡壽命,則為橫死。真解脫中無如是事。不逼切者如轉輪王,所有神珠能伏蜣蜋、九十六種諸毒虫等,若有聞是神珠香者,諸毒消滅。真解脫者亦復如是,皆悉遠離二十五有,毒消滅者喻真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又不逼切者,譬如虛空,解脫亦爾,彼虛空者,喻真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又逼切者如近乾草,然諸燈火,近則熾然;真解脫中無如是事。又不逼切者,譬如日月,不逼眾生。解脫亦爾,於諸眾生無有逼切,無有逼切喻真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名無動法,猶如怨親,真解脫中無如是事。又不動者如轉輪王,更無聖王以為親友,若更有親,則無是處。解脫亦爾,更無有親,若有親者亦無是處,彼王無親喻真解脫,真解脫者即是如來,如來者即是法也。又無動者譬如素衣,易受染色,解脫不爾。又無動者如婆師花,欲令有臭及青色者,無有是處。解脫亦爾,欲令有臭及諸色者,亦無是處,是故解脫即是如來。又解脫者名為希有,譬如水中生於蓮花,非為希有,火中生者,是乃希有,有人見之便生歡喜。真解脫者亦復如是,其有見者,心生歡喜;彼希有者,喻真解脫,真解脫者即是如來,其如來者即是法身。又希有者,譬如嬰兒,其齒未生,漸漸長大然後乃生;解脫不爾,無有生與不生。

「又解脫者,名曰虛寂,無有不定。不定者,如一闡提究竟不移,犯重禁者不成佛道,無有是處。何以故?是人若於佛正法中,心得淨信,爾時即便滅一闡提,若復得作優婆塞者,亦得斷滅於一闡提,犯重禁者滅此罪已,則得成佛。是故若言,畢定不移,不成佛道,無有是處。真解脫中都無如是滅盡之事。又虛寂者墮於法界,如法界性即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又一闡提若盡滅者,則不得稱一闡提也。何等名為一闡提耶?一闡提者,斷滅一切諸善根,本心不攀緣一切善法,乃至不生一念之善。真解脫中都無是事,無是事故,即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名不可量,譬如穀聚,其量可知。真解脫者則不如是,譬如大海不可度量,解脫亦爾不可度量,不可量者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名無量法,如一眾生多有業報。解脫亦爾,有無量報,無量報者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名為廣大,譬如大海無與等者。解脫亦爾無能與等,無與等者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名曰最上,譬如虛空最高無比。解脫亦爾最高無比,高無比者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名無能過,譬如師子所住之處,一切百獸無能過者。解脫亦爾無有能過,無能過者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名為無上,譬如北方,諸方中上。解脫亦爾,為無有上,無有上者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名無上上,譬如北方之於東方,為無上上。解脫亦爾無有上上,無上上者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名曰恒法,譬如人天身壞命終,是名曰恒,非不恒也。解脫亦爾非是不恒,非不恒者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名曰堅實,如佉陀羅栴檀沈水,其性堅實。解脫亦爾其性堅實,性堅實者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名曰不虛,譬如竹葦其體空踈;解脫不爾,當知解脫即是如來。又解脫者名不可污,譬如牆壁未被塗治,蚊虻在上止住遊戲,若以塗治綵畫彫飾,虫聞綵香即便不住;如是不住喻真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名曰無邊,譬如聚落,皆有邊表。解脫不爾,譬如虛空無有邊際,解脫亦爾無有邊際,如是解脫即是如來。又解脫者名不可見,譬如空中鳥跡難見,如是難見,喻真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名曰甚深,何以故?聲聞緣覺所不能入,不能入者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又甚深者諸佛菩薩之所恭敬,譬如孝子供養父母功德甚深,功德甚深喻真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名不可見,譬如有人不見自頂。解脫亦爾,聲聞緣覺所不能見,不能見者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名無屋宅,譬如虛空無有屋宅。解脫亦爾,言屋宅者,喻二十五有,無有屋宅者,喻真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名不可取,如阿摩勒果,人可取持。解脫不爾,不可取持,不可取持即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名不可執,譬如幻物不可執持。解脫亦爾不可執持,不可執持即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者無有身體,譬如有人體生瘡疣及諸癰疽、癲狂乾枯。真解脫中無如是病,無如是病喻真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名為一味,如乳一味,解脫亦爾,唯有一味,如是一味即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名曰清淨,如水無泥,澄靜清淨。解脫亦爾澄靜清淨,澄靜清淨即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名曰一味,如空中雨,一味清淨,一味清淨喻真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名曰除却,譬如滿月,無諸雲翳。解脫亦爾無諸雲翳,無諸雲翳即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名曰寂靜,譬如有人熱病除愈,身得寂靜。解脫亦爾,身得寂靜,身得寂靜即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者即是平等,譬如野田毒蛇、鼠狼俱有殺心。解脫不爾,無有殺心,無殺心者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又平等者,譬如父母等心於子,解脫亦爾其心平等,心平等者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名無異處,譬如有人唯居上妙清淨屋宅,更無異處。解脫亦爾,無有異處,無異處者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名曰知足,譬如飢人值遇甘饌,食之無厭。解脫不爾,如食乳糜,更無所須,更無所須喻真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名曰斷絕,如人被縛,斷縛得脫。解脫亦爾,斷絕一切疑心結縛,如是斷疑即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名到彼岸,譬如大河有此、彼岸。解脫不爾,雖無此岸而有彼岸,有彼岸者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名曰默然,譬如大海其水汎涱,多諸音聲;解脫不爾,如是解脫即是如來。又解脫者名曰美妙,譬如眾藥,雜呵梨勒,其味則苦。解脫不爾,味如甘露,味如甘露喻真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者除諸煩惱,譬如良醫和合諸藥,善療眾病。解脫亦爾能除煩惱,除煩惱者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名曰無迮,譬如小舍,不容多人。解脫不爾,多所容受,多所容受即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者,名滅諸愛,不雜婬欲,譬如女人,多諸愛欲。解脫不爾,如是解脫即是如來,如來如是無有貪欲、瞋恚、愚癡、憍慢等結。又解脫者名曰無愛,愛有二種:一者餓鬼愛,二者法愛。真解脫者離餓鬼愛,憐愍眾生故有法愛,如是法愛即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者離我、我所,如是解脫即是如來,如來者即是法也。又解脫者即是滅盡,離諸有貪,如是解脫即是如來,如來者即是法也。又解脫者即是救護,能救一切諸怖畏者,如是解脫即是如來,如來者即是法也。又解脫者即是歸處,若有歸依如是解脫,不求餘依。譬如有人,依恃於王,不求餘依,雖復依王,則有動轉。依解脫者,無有動轉,無動轉者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來,如來者即是法也。又解脫者名為屋宅,譬如有人行於曠野,則有險難。解脫不爾,無有險難,無險難者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者是無所畏,如師子王,於諸百獸不生怖畏。解脫亦爾,於諸魔眾不生怖畏,無怖畏者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者無有迮狹,譬如隘路乃至不受二人並行;解脫不爾,如是解脫,即是如來。又有不迮,譬如有人,畏虎墮井;解脫不爾,如是解脫即是如來。又有不迮,如大海中,捨壞小船得堅牢船,乘之度海到安隱處,心得快樂。解脫亦爾,心得快樂,得快樂者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者拔諸因緣,譬如因乳得酪,因酪得酥,因酥得醍醐。真解脫中都無是因,無是因者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者能伏憍慢,譬如大王慢於小王;解脫不爾,如是解脫即是如來,如來者即是法也。又解脫者伏諸放逸,謂放逸者多有貪欲;真解脫中無有是名,無是名者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。

「又解脫者能除無明,如上妙酥,除諸滓穢,乃名醍醐。解脫亦爾,除無明滓,生於真明,如是真明即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名為寂靜,純一無二,如空野象,獨一無侶。解脫亦爾,獨一無二,獨一無二即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名為堅實,如竹葦、蜱麻,莖幹空虛,而子堅實,除佛如來,其餘人天皆不堅實,真解脫者遠離一切諸有流等,如是解脫即是如來。又解脫者名能覺了、增益於我,真解脫者亦復如是,如是解脫即是如來。又解脫者名捨諸有,譬如有人食已而吐。解脫亦爾,捨於諸有,捨諸有者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名曰決定,如婆師花香,七葉中無,解脫亦爾,如是解脫即是如來。又解脫者名曰水大,譬如水大,於諸大勝,能潤一切草木穀子。解脫亦爾,能潤一切有生之類,如是解脫即是如來。又解脫者名曰為入,如有門戶,則通入路金性之處,金則可得。解脫亦爾,如彼門戶,修無我者,則得入中,如是解脫即是如來。又解脫者名曰為善,譬如弟子隨逐於師,善奉教勅,得名為善。解脫亦爾,如是解脫即是如來。

「又解脫者名出世法,於一切法最為出過,如眾味中酥乳最勝。解脫亦爾,如是解脫即是如來。又解脫者名曰不動,譬如門閫風不能動。真解脫者亦復如是,如是解脫即是如來。又解脫者名無濤波,如彼大海其水濤波;解脫不爾,如是解脫即是如來。又解脫者譬如宮殿,解脫亦爾,當知解脫即是如來。又解脫者名曰所用,如閻浮檀金,多有所任,無有能說是金過惡。解脫亦爾,無有過惡,無有過惡即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者捨嬰兒行,譬如大人,捨小兒行。解脫亦爾,除捨五陰,除捨五陰即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名曰究竟,如被繫者,從繫得脫,洗浴清淨,然後還家。解脫亦爾,畢竟清淨,畢竟清淨即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名無作樂,無作樂者,貪欲、瞋恚、愚癡吐故;喻如有人誤飲蛇毒,為除毒故,即服吐藥,既得吐已,毒即除愈,身得安樂。解脫亦爾,吐於煩惱、諸結、縛毒,身得安樂,名無作樂,無作樂者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名斷四種毒蛇煩惱,斷煩惱者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。

「又解脫者名離諸有,滅一切苦得一切樂,永斷貪欲、瞋恚、愚癡,拔斷一切煩惱根本,拔根本者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名斷一切有為之法,出生一切無漏善法,斷塞諸道,所謂若我、無我、非我、非無我,唯斷取著,不斷我見,我見者名為佛性,佛性者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者,名不空空,空空者名無所有,無所有者,即是外道尼犍子等所計解脫,而是尼犍實無解脫,故名空空;真解脫者則不如是,故不空空,不空空者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者,名空不空。如水、酒、酪、酥、蜜等瓶,雖無水酒酪酥蜜時,猶故得名為水等瓶,而是瓶等,不可說空及以不空。若言空者,則不得有色、香、味、觸;若言不空,而復無有水、酒等實。解脫亦爾,不可說色及以非色,不可說空及以不空。若言空者,則不得有常樂我淨;若言不空,誰受是常樂我淨者?以是義故,不可說空及以不空。空者謂無二十五有及諸煩惱、一切苦、一切相、一切有為行,如瓶無酪,則名為空;不空者,謂真實善色、常樂我淨、不動不變,猶如彼瓶,色香味觸,故名不空。是故解脫喻如彼瓶,彼瓶遇緣則有破壞;解脫不爾,不可破壞,不可破壞即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。又解脫者名曰離愛,譬如有人,愛心悕望釋提桓因、大梵天王、自在天王;解脫不爾,若得成於阿耨多羅三藐三菩提已,無愛無疑,無愛無疑即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。若言解脫有愛疑者,無有是處。又解脫者斷諸有貪,斷一切相、一切繫縛、一切煩惱、一切生死、一切因緣、一切果報,如是解脫即是如來,如來即是涅槃。一切眾生怖畏生死諸煩惱故,故受三歸,譬如群鹿,怖畏獵師,既得免離,若得一跳,則喻一歸,如是三跳則喻三歸;以三跳故,得受安樂。眾生亦爾,怖畏四魔、惡獵師故,受三歸依,三歸依故則得安樂,受安樂者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。如來者即是涅槃,涅槃者即是無盡,無盡者即是佛性,佛性者即是決定,決定者即是阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。」

Ru-Yi Translation

The bodhisattva Kāśyapa then said again to the Buddha: "World-Honored One, I beg only that you, out of compassion, once more expound at length the meaning of the conduct of liberation within this great nirvāṇa." The Buddha praised Kāśyapa: "Excellent, excellent, good son! True liberation is called being far removed from every fetter. If true liberation is removed from every fetter, then it has no birth, and no coming together of causes either — for it is like a father and mother coming together to produce a child, and true liberation is not like this at all; this is why liberation is called unborn. Kāśyapa, it is like ghee, whose nature is pure; the Tathāgata is just the same — not born from the union of a father and mother, his nature is pure. The reason he manifests as though he had parents at all is only in order to bring beings across. True liberation is itself the Tathāgata, and the Tathāgata's own liberation admits of no duality, no distinction. It is like seeds sown in the spring months, which sprout as soon as they receive warmth — true liberation is not like this at all. Liberation is further called empty of substance: emptiness of substance is itself liberation, liberation is itself the Tathāgata, and the Tathāgata is himself empty of substance, not something made by any act of making. Whatever is made is like a city wall, a watchtower, a rampart — true liberation is not like this at all, and this is why liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further the unconditioned dharma: it is like a potter who makes a vessel only to have it break again — liberation is not like this; true liberation is unborn and unceasing, and this is why liberation is itself the Tathāgata. The Tathāgata is just the same: unborn and unceasing, free of old age and death, unbroken and indestructible, not a conditioned thing at all — and it is for this very meaning that he is called the Tathāgata who enters this great nirvāṇa. What is meant by 'free of old age and death'? Old age means undergoing change — hair turning white, the face growing wrinkled; death means the body's own dissolution, life coming to its end. Dharmas of this kind do not exist within liberation, and it is precisely because they do not exist there that it is called liberation. The Tathāgata likewise has no whitening hair, no wrinkling face, no conditioned dharma of this kind at all — this is why the Tathāgata has no old age; and having no old age, he likewise has no death. Liberation is further called free of illness: illness means the four hundred and four diseases, and every other affliction that comes from outside to harm the body — and because none of this exists there, it is called liberation. Being free of illness is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata; the Tathāgata has no illness, and so the Dharma-body likewise has no illness — this very freedom from illness is itself the Tathāgata. Death means the body's dissolution, life coming to its end; where there is no death, this is itself the nectar of immortality, and this very nectar is true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Since the Tathāgata has accomplished virtues such as these, how could it be said that the Tathāgata is impermanent? To say he is impermanent could not possibly be right. This is the vajra body — how could it be impermanent? This is why the Tathāgata is not said to have his life come to its end. The Tathāgata is pure, free of any defilement; the Tathāgata's own body was never sullied by any womb, but is, like the white lotus, pure in its very nature. The Tathāgata's own liberation is just the same, and this very liberation is itself the Tathāgata — this is why the Tathāgata is pure, free of any defilement. Liberation is further one in which every outflow, every wound and blemish, is left with nothing whatsoever remaining; the Tathāgata is just the same, free of every outflow, every wound and blemish. Liberation is further one in which there is no contention at all — it is like a starving person who, seeing another's food, gives rise to the thought of seizing it by force; liberation is not like this at all. Liberation is further called stillness: ordinary people say that Maheśvara is what stillness means, but such a claim is entirely false — true stillness is final and complete liberation, and this final and complete liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called security: a place infested with many robbers cannot be called secure, only a place that is calm and settled can be called secure. Within this liberation there is no fear at all, and this is why it is called security — and this very security is true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata, and the Tathāgata is himself the Dharma. Liberation is further one that has no equal or peer — having an equal is like one king having a rival kingdom of equal standing. Liberation is not like this at all; having no equal or peer is like a wheel-turning sage-king, whom no one is able to match as an equal. Liberation is just the same, having no equal or peer — and this very absence of any equal is true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata, the king who turns the wheel of the Dharma; this is why the Tathāgata has no equal or peer at all, and to say he has one could not possibly be right. Liberation is further called free of sorrow — one who has sorrow is like a king who fears a powerful neighboring kingdom and thereby gives rise to sorrow. True liberation has nothing of this kind at all; it is like an enemy already destroyed, leaving no cause for worry — liberation is just the same, entirely free of sorrow and fear, and this very freedom from sorrow and fear is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further one with neither sorrow nor joy — it is like a woman with only a single son, sent away on some distant errand, who suddenly receives grim news of him and is filled with grief, only to hear later that he is alive after all, and is filled with joy. Within liberation there is nothing of this kind at all; this very freedom from sorrow and joy is true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further free of dust and defilement — it is like the spring months, when, after the sun sets, the wind rises and stirs up dust and haze; within liberation there is nothing of this kind at all, and this very freedom from dust and haze is a likeness for true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. It is like the bright jewel set in a sage-king's own topknot, free of any blemish — the nature of liberation is just the same, free of any blemish, and this very freedom from blemish is a likeness for true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. It is like the nature of true gold, unmixed with sand or stone, rightly called a true treasure, so that whoever obtains it thinks at once of wealth — the nature of liberation is just the same, like that true treasure, and this true treasure is a likeness for true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. It is like a clay vessel, which, when struck, gives off a cracked, hollow sound — a vessel of vajra is not like this at all; liberation likewise gives off no such cracked sound, and a vajra vessel is a likeness for true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata — this is why the Tathāgata's own body is indestructible. As for that cracked sound — it is like a castor-oil seed, which, placed out in the blazing heat of the sun, bursts open with a loud crack; liberation has nothing of this kind at all, but is like that true vessel of vajra, giving off no cracked, breaking sound, even were hundreds of thousands of people to shoot arrows at it all together, unable to destroy it — and this very absence of any cracking sound is a likeness for true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. It is like a poor person, in debt to others, bound by that debt, placed in chains and punished, enduring every bitter suffering; within liberation there is nothing of this kind at all, no debt whatsoever — it is like an elder possessed of countless millions in wealth, sovereign and free, owing nothing to anyone. Liberation is just the same, possessed of immeasurable treasures of the Dharma, sovereign and free, owing nothing to anyone at all — and this very freedom from debt is a likeness for true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called free of oppression — it is like traveling through heat in spring, eating something too sweet in summer, or being touched by cold in winter; true liberation has none of these disagreeable things, and this very freedom from oppression is a likeness for true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata.

"Freedom from oppression is further like a person who, having eaten his fill of fish and meat, then drinks milk on top of it, and is thereby brought close to death before long. True liberation has nothing of this kind at all — and should such a person obtain the fine medicine of nectar, his affliction would be entirely removed. True liberation is just the same, and this nectar-medicine is a likeness for true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. What is meant by oppression, and freedom from oppression? It is like an ordinary person, arrogant and self-important, who thinks to himself: 'Who in this whole assembly could possibly harm me?' and so goes about carrying snakes, tigers, and venomous creatures — such a person, you may be sure, will meet a violent death long before his natural lifespan is complete. True liberation has nothing of this kind at all. Freedom from oppression is further like a wheel-turning king's own sacred jewel, able to subdue dung beetles and ninety-six kinds of venomous creature — whoever catches even the scent of this sacred jewel finds every poison instantly dissolved. True liberation is just the same, entirely free of the twenty-five states of existence, and this very dissolving of poison is a likeness for true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Freedom from oppression is further like open space itself; liberation is just the same, and this open space is a likeness for true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Oppression, on the other hand, is like dry grass near a burning lamp, which catches fire the moment it draws close; true liberation has nothing of this kind at all. Freedom from oppression is further like the sun and moon, which press upon no being at all; liberation is just the same, exerting no oppression upon any being, and this very freedom from oppression is a likeness for true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called the unmoving dharma, unlike the distinction between friend and enemy; true liberation has nothing of this kind at all. Unmovingness is further like a wheel-turning king, who has no other sage-king as his own personal friend — for there to be such a friend could not possibly be so. Liberation is just the same, having no friend at all; for there to be such a friend could likewise not possibly be so — and this very absence of a friend in that king is a likeness for true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata, and the Tathāgata is himself the Dharma. Unmovingness is further like plain, undyed cloth, which readily takes on any color when dyed; liberation is not like this at all. Unmovingness is further like the vāsantī flower, which could never be made to give off a foul smell or turn blue in color; liberation is just the same — for it to give off a foul smell or take on any other color could not possibly be so; this is why liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called rare and wondrous — it is like a lotus growing in water, which is not itself something rare, but a lotus growing out of fire, which is indeed rare, and whoever sees it is filled with joy. True liberation is just the same — whoever sees it gives rise to joy in their heart; that very rarity is a likeness for true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata, and the Tathāgata is himself the Dharma-body. Rarity is further like an infant whose teeth have not yet come in, which grow in only gradually as the child matures; liberation is not like this at all — it has nothing of arising or not yet having arisen.

"Liberation is further called empty stillness, having nothing that remains undetermined. As for what is undetermined — it could not possibly be so that the icchantika remains forever and finally unmoved, or that one who has committed a grave transgression can never accomplish the path to buddhahood. Why is this? If such a person gives rise, within the Buddha's own true Dharma, to a mind of pure faith, the icchantika-condition is at once extinguished in them; and should such a person then become an upāsaka, the icchantika-condition can likewise be cut off and extinguished; and should one who has committed a grave transgression extinguish that very transgression, that person too can attain buddhahood. This is why it could not possibly be so to say that such conditions are forever and finally fixed, unable to attain buddhahood. True liberation has nothing whatsoever of such utter finality within it. Emptiness and stillness are further said to fall within the Dharma-realm — and the very nature of the Dharma-realm is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. If the icchantika-condition can indeed be entirely extinguished, then such a person can no longer properly be called an icchantika at all. What, then, is meant by the term icchantika? An icchantika is one who has cut off and extinguished every root of goodness, whose fundamental mind clings to no wholesome dharma at all, not giving rise to even a single thought of goodness. True liberation has nothing of this kind within it at all, and it is precisely because it has nothing of this kind that it is true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called immeasurable — it is like a heap of grain, whose quantity can be known; true liberation is not like this at all, but is like the great ocean, impossible to measure — liberation is just the same, impossible to measure, and this very immeasurability is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called a dharma without limit — it is like a single being who has many different karmic retributions; liberation is just the same, having limitless retributions, and this very limitlessness is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called vast and expansive — it is like the great ocean, which has nothing equal to it; liberation is just the same, having nothing equal to it, and this very absence of an equal is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called the highest — it is like open space, higher than anything, beyond compare; liberation is just the same, higher than anything, beyond compare, and this very incomparable height is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called that which nothing can surpass — it is like the place where a lion dwells, which none of the hundred beasts can ever surpass; liberation is just the same, surpassed by nothing at all, and this very insurpassability is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called peerless — it is like the north, foremost among all directions; liberation is just the same, having nothing above it, and this very peerlessness is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called beyond the peerless itself — it is like the north in relation to the east, beyond even what is peerless; liberation is just the same, having nothing beyond the peerless, and this itself is true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called the constant dharma — it is like a god or a human whose body dissolves and whose life ends, and this very dissolution is itself called constant, not something inconstant; liberation is just the same, never inconstant, and this very constancy is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called firm and substantial — it is like acacia wood or aloeswood, whose nature is firm and substantial; liberation is just the same, its nature firm and substantial, and this very firmness of nature is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called not empty — it is like bamboo or reed, whose stalks are hollow inside; liberation is not like this at all — one should understand that liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called free of any stain — it is like a wall not yet plastered, upon which mosquitoes and gnats settle and play, but which, once plastered and painted with fine colors, no longer attracts these insects, who, catching the scent of the paint, no longer settle there at all; this very not-settling is a likeness for true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called boundless — it is like a village, which always has some boundary marking its edge; liberation is not like this at all, but is like open space, without any boundary at all — liberation is just the same, without any boundary, and this very liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called invisible — it is like a bird's track through open sky, difficult to see at all; this very difficulty of seeing is a likeness for true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called exceedingly profound — why is this? Because no śrāvaka or pratyekabuddha is able to enter it, and this very inability to enter it is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. This profundity is further something every buddha and bodhisattva reveres — it is like a filial child's own offering to his parents, whose merit runs exceedingly deep; this very depth of merit is a likeness for true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called invisible in another sense — it is like a person who cannot see the crown of his own head; liberation is just the same, unable to be seen by any śrāvaka or pratyekabuddha, and this very inability to be seen is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called without any dwelling — it is like open space, which has no dwelling at all; liberation is just the same — the word 'dwelling' here stands for the twenty-five states of existence, and this very absence of a dwelling is a likeness for true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called ungraspable — it is like the āmalaka fruit, which a person can pick up and hold; liberation is not like this at all, ungraspable in every way, and this very ungraspability is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called unable to be seized — it is like a conjured illusion, which cannot be seized and held; liberation is just the same, unable to be seized, and this very inability to be seized is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further one that has no body at all — it is like a person whose body breaks out in wounds, blemishes, boils, madness, and withering decay; true liberation has no such illness at all, and this very freedom from such illness is a likeness for true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called a single flavor — it is like milk, which has but a single flavor; liberation is just the same, having only a single flavor, and this very single flavor is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called pure — it is like water free of mud, calm, settled, and clear; liberation is just the same, calm, settled, and clear, and this very calm clarity is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called a single flavor in another sense — it is like rain falling from the sky, a single, pure flavor; this single, pure flavor is a likeness for true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called clearing away — it is like the full moon, free of every cloud; liberation is just the same, free of every cloud, and this very freedom from cloud is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called stillness — it is like a person whose fever has been cured, whose body has become still; liberation is just the same, the body becoming still, and this very stillness of body is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further itself equanimity — it is like a venomous snake and a weasel in a wild field, both harboring the intent to kill; liberation is not like this at all, harboring no intent to kill, and this very freedom from the intent to kill is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Equanimity is further like parents whose hearts regard their children equally; liberation is just the same, its own mind entirely equal, and this very equanimity of mind is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called having no other place — it is like a person who dwells only in the finest, purest dwelling, with no other place at all; liberation is just the same, having no other place, and this very absence of any other place is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called contentment — it is like a starving person who comes upon a fine feast and eats without ever feeling satisfied; liberation is not like this at all, but is like eating a bowl of rice-milk, after which nothing further is needed at all — this very absence of any further need is a likeness for true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called cutting off — it is like a person who has been bound, who cuts the binding and is freed; liberation is just the same, cutting off every doubt and every fetter of the mind, and this very cutting off of doubt is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called reaching the far shore — it is like a great river, having a near shore and a far shore; liberation is not like this at all — though it has no near shore, it does have a far shore, and this very having of a far shore is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called silence — it is like the great ocean, whose waters surge and roar with every kind of sound; liberation is not like this at all, and this very liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called delicious — it is like a medicine mixed with harītakī, whose flavor is bitter; liberation is not like this at all, its flavor like nectar, and this very flavor of nectar is a likeness for true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further one that removes every affliction — it is like a skilled physician who compounds every kind of medicine, well able to heal every illness; liberation is just the same, able to remove every affliction, and this very removal of affliction is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called without confinement — it is like a small dwelling, unable to hold many people; liberation is not like this at all, able to hold and receive without limit, and this very unlimited capacity is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called the extinguishing of every craving, unmixed with lust — it is like a woman filled with every kind of craving and desire; liberation is not like this at all, and this very liberation is itself the Tathāgata, the Tathāgata being just so, free of craving, anger, delusion, arrogance, and every other fetter. Liberation is further called free of attachment — attachment is of two kinds: the attachment of a hungry ghost, and the attachment of the Dharma. True liberation is free of the hungry ghost's attachment, but, out of compassion for beings, holds the attachment of the Dharma — and this very attachment to the Dharma is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further free of self and of what belongs to a self, and this very liberation is itself the Tathāgata, and the Tathāgata is himself the Dharma. Liberation is further itself utter extinction, free of every craving tied to existence, and this very liberation is itself the Tathāgata, and the Tathāgata is himself the Dharma. Liberation is further itself rescue and protection, able to save all who are afraid, and this very liberation is itself the Tathāgata, and the Tathāgata is himself the Dharma. Liberation is further itself a refuge: whoever takes refuge in this liberation seeks no other refuge at all — it is like a person who relies on a king and seeks no other reliance, and yet, even relying on a king, still remains subject to change. Whoever relies on liberation is subject to no such change at all, and this very freedom from change is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata, and the Tathāgata is himself the Dharma. Liberation is further called a dwelling — it is like a person traveling through the wilderness, who meets with danger and hardship there; liberation is not like this at all, free of any danger or hardship, and this very freedom from danger is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further itself fearlessness — it is like the lion king, who feels no fear before any of the hundred beasts; liberation is just the same, feeling no fear before any host of māras, and this very fearlessness is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further one with no confinement at all — it is like a narrow path, too narrow even for two people to walk abreast; liberation is not like this at all, and this very liberation is itself the Tathāgata. It is further without confinement in another sense — it is like a person who, fleeing a tiger, falls into a well instead; liberation is not like this at all, and this very liberation is itself the Tathāgata. It is further without confinement in yet another sense — it is like someone at sea who abandons a broken, small boat for a sound, sturdy one, and, riding it across the ocean, arrives at a place of safety, the heart filled with joy; liberation is just the same, the heart filled with joy, and this very joy is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further one that uproots every causal chain — it is like how milk gives rise to curds, curds to butter, and butter to ghee; true liberation has no such causal chain within it at all, and this very absence of causal chain is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further able to subdue arrogance — it is like a great king who looks down with arrogance upon a lesser king; liberation is not like this at all, and this very liberation is itself the Tathāgata, and the Tathāgata is himself the Dharma. Liberation is further able to subdue every heedlessness — for one who is heedless is said to have much craving; true liberation has no such name attached to it at all, and this very absence of the name is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata.

"Liberation is further able to remove ignorance — it is like the finest ghee, having removed every impure sediment, that comes to be called ghee at all; liberation is just the same, removing the sediment of ignorance and giving rise to true clarity, and this very true clarity is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called stillness, single and without a second — it is like a lone elephant roaming the open wilderness, solitary, without a companion; liberation is just the same, single and without a second, and this very solitary oneness is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called firm and substantial — it is like bamboo, reed, or the castor plant, whose stalks are hollow inside yet whose seeds are firm and substantial; except for the Buddha, the Tathāgata, every other being among gods and humans is not firm and substantial in this way — true liberation, being far removed from every stream of existence, is just this same firmness, and this very liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called that which fully awakens, and enriches the true self — true liberation is just the same, and this very liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called the relinquishing of all existence — it is like a person who, having eaten, then vomits it back up; liberation is just the same, relinquishing all existence, and this very relinquishing of existence is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called determinate — it is like the fragrance of the vāsantī flower, absent from the flower's own seven petals; liberation is just the same, and this very liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called the great element of water — it is like the element of water, foremost among the great elements, able to moisten every plant, tree, and seed; liberation is just the same, able to nourish every kind of living being, and this very liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called an entryway — it is like a doorway that opens onto a road leading to a place where gold is found, so that gold can then be obtained; liberation is just the same, like that very doorway — whoever cultivates the absence of self is able to enter through it, and this very liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called that which is good — it is like a student who follows his teacher and skillfully upholds his instruction, and is thereby called good; liberation is just the same, and this very liberation is itself the Tathāgata.

"Liberation is further called a dharma transcending the world, surpassing every other dharma — it is like how, among every flavor, ghee and milk are the finest; liberation is just the same, and this very liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called unmoving — it is like a threshold that the wind cannot move; true liberation is just the same, and this very liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called free of surging waves — it is like the great ocean, whose waters surge and roll; liberation is not like this at all, and this very liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further like a palace hall; liberation is just the same — one should understand that liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called that which is put to use — it is like Jambūnada gold, put to use in countless ways, with no one able to name any fault in this gold at all; liberation is just the same, without any fault at all, and this very freedom from fault is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further the relinquishing of infant conduct — it is like an adult who has relinquished a small child's own ways; liberation is just the same, relinquishing the five aggregates, and this very relinquishing of the aggregates is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called final completion — it is like one who was bound, freed from that binding, who bathes and becomes clean, and only then returns home; liberation is just the same, finally and completely pure, and this very final purity is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called the joy of no further striving — this joy of no further striving means the vomiting-up of craving, anger, and delusion; it is like a person who has mistakenly drunk snake venom, and, in order to expel the poison, takes an emetic, and, having vomited, is entirely cured of the poison and finds ease in his body. Liberation is just the same — vomiting up affliction, every fetter, and the poison that binds one, the body finds ease, and this is called the joy of no further striving, and this very joy of no further striving is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called the severing of the four kinds of poisonous serpent, that is, affliction itself — and this very severing of affliction is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata.

"Liberation is further called being free of all existence, extinguishing every suffering and attaining every bliss, forever cutting off craving, anger, and delusion, uprooting the very root of every affliction — and this very uprooting is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called the cutting off of every conditioned dharma, giving rise to every undefiled, wholesome dharma, and severing every blocked path — whether self, no-self, neither-self-nor-no-self — cutting off only clinging and attachment, but not cutting off the view that there is a self; for this very view of a self is what is called buddha-nature, and buddha-nature is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called not an empty emptiness — an empty emptiness means having nothing at all, which is the liberation conceived of by the Nirgrantha ascetics and other heterodox teachers; since these Nirgranthas have in truth no liberation at all, theirs is called an empty emptiness. True liberation is not like this at all, and so is not an empty emptiness — this very not-being an empty emptiness is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called empty and not empty. It is like vessels for water, wine, curds, ghee, or honey: even when there is no water, wine, curds, ghee, or honey in them, they are still called by those very names — and one cannot properly say of such vessels that they are simply empty, or simply not empty. If one says they are empty, then they could not possess color, fragrance, flavor, or texture at all; if one says they are not empty, then there is in fact no water, wine, or the like actually within them. Liberation is just the same: one cannot say it has form, nor that it is without form; one cannot say it is empty, nor that it is not empty. If one says it is empty, then it could not possess permanence, bliss, self, and purity at all; if one says it is not empty, then who is it that receives this permanence, bliss, self, and purity? For this very reason, one cannot say it is empty, nor that it is not empty. 'Empty' here means free of the twenty-five states of existence and every affliction, every suffering, every mark, and every conditioned formation — like a vessel with no curds in it, this is called empty. 'Not empty' means the true and genuine form, permanence, bliss, self, and purity, unmoving and unchanging — like that very vessel's own color, fragrance, flavor, and texture, this is called not empty. Liberation may thus be likened to that vessel — except that an ordinary vessel, given the right conditions, can be broken; liberation is not like this at all, and cannot be broken — this very unbreakability is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. Liberation is further called free of craving — it is like a person whose heart craves and longs for Śakra, the Great Brahmā King, or Maheśvara; liberation is not like this at all — once one has accomplished unsurpassed, complete awakening, there is no craving and no doubt left at all, and this very freedom from craving and doubt is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. To say that liberation still harbors craving or doubt could not possibly be right. Liberation further cuts off every craving tied to existence, cutting off every mark, every fetter, every affliction, all of birth and death, every causal condition, and every karmic result — and this very liberation is itself the Tathāgata, and the Tathāgata is himself nirvāṇa. Every being, out of fear of birth and death and of every affliction, takes the three refuges — it is like a herd of deer, fearing a hunter, who, once they have escaped him, leap away: a single leap is a likeness for a single refuge, and these three leaps together are a likeness for the three refuges; through these three leaps they find safety and ease. Beings are just the same: out of fear of the four māras, that evil hunter, they take the three refuges, and through these three refuges they attain ease — and this very attainment of ease is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata. The Tathāgata is himself nirvāṇa; nirvāṇa is itself the inexhaustible; the inexhaustible is itself buddha-nature; buddha-nature is itself the determinate; and the determinate is itself unsurpassed, complete awakening."

Reading note — Ru-Yi Meditation Center

No portion of Huiyuan's commentary consulted for this collection glosses this litany simile-by-simile, so this note is offered as original commentary rather than a paraphrase of an ancient source. Read as a whole, the passage's sheer redundancy is doing structural work rather than simply padding the text: dozens of independent images — from the unbreakable vajra vessel to the herd of deer's three leaps to safety — are each run through the identical closing formula ("X is true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata"), so that no single simile can be mistaken for capturing liberation's actual essence any more than any other does. The passage functions less like a definition than like a proof by relentless triangulation: liberation is not the unbreakable vessel, not the deer's leap, not the ghee purified of sediment — it is whatever all of these, and dozens more besides, are each independently pointing toward, and the only fixed term across every single one of them is that this pointed-toward reality is the Tathāgata himself. Two threads inside the catalog matter enough to flag on their own. First, the icchantika clause embedded partway through — stating outright that "it could not possibly be so" that the icchantika condition is forever fixed, and that faith alone extinguishes it — directly contradicts the flat "incurable" language from earlier in this very fascicle, and should be read together with that passage's own note as two positions this sūtra is visibly working to reconcile rather than a settled doctrine stated twice. Second, the passage's closing identification of nirvāṇa with "the inexhaustible," "buddha-nature," and "the determinate" in one unbroken chain is this fascicle's most direct anticipation yet of 如來性品's central thesis — that buddha-nature is not a separate topic from nirvāṇa but simply nirvāṇa considered from the angle of what every being already, determinately, possesses.

Are the Three Refuges One, or Three?

Chinese Source

迦葉菩薩白佛言:「世尊!若涅槃、佛性、決定、如來,是一義者,云何說言有三歸依?」佛告迦葉:「善男子!一切眾生怖畏生死,故求三歸,以三歸故,則知佛性、決定、涅槃。善男子!有法名一義異,有法名義俱異。名一義異者,佛常、法常、比丘僧常、涅槃虛空皆亦是常,是名名一義異。名義俱異者,佛名為覺、法名不覺、僧名和合、涅槃名解脫、虛空名非善亦名無礙,是為名義俱異。善男子!三歸依者亦復如是,名義俱異,云何為一?是故我告摩訶波闍波提:『憍曇彌!莫供養我,當供養僧。若供養僧,則得具足供養三歸。』摩訶波闍波提即答我言:『眾僧之中,無佛無法,云何說言供養眾僧,則得具足供養三歸?』我復告言:『汝隨我語,則供養佛;為解脫故,即供養法;眾僧受者,則供養僧。』善男子!是故三歸不得為一。善男子!如來或時說一為三,說三為一,如是之義,諸佛境界,非是聲聞緣覺所知。」

Ru-Yi Translation

The bodhisattva Kāśyapa said to the Buddha: "World-Honored One, if nirvāṇa, buddha-nature, the determinate, and the Tathāgata are all a single meaning, then why is it said that there are three refuges?" The Buddha said to Kāśyapa: "Good son, every being, out of fear of birth and death, seeks the three refuges, and it is through these three refuges that one comes to know buddha-nature, the determinate, and nirvāṇa. Good son, there are dharmas whose names are one but whose meanings differ, and there are dharmas whose names and meanings both differ. As for names being one while meanings differ: the Buddha is permanent, the Dharma is permanent, the assembly of monks is permanent, and nirvāṇa and space are likewise permanent — this is a case of the name being one while the meanings differ. As for names and meanings both differing: the Buddha is named awakening, the Dharma is named non-awakening, the Saṅgha is named harmony, nirvāṇa is named liberation, and space is named neither wholesome nor unwholesome, and also named unobstructed — this is a case where both name and meaning differ. Good son, the three refuges are just the same, differing in both name and meaning — how, then, could they be called one and the same thing? This is why I once said to Mahāprajāpatī: 'Gautamī, do not make offerings to me — make offerings to the saṅgha instead. If you make offerings to the saṅgha, you will thereby fulfill the offering of all three refuges at once.' Mahāprajāpatī answered me: 'Neither the Buddha nor the Dharma is present within the saṅgha — how, then, can it be said that making offerings to the saṅgha fulfills the offering of all three refuges at once?' I said to her further: 'Your following my own instruction is itself an offering to the Buddha; your doing so for the sake of liberation is itself an offering to the Dharma; and the saṅgha's own acceptance of your offering is itself an offering to the Saṅgha.' Good son, this is why the three refuges cannot be treated as a single thing. Good son, the Tathāgata sometimes speaks of one thing as three, and of three things as one — such a matter belongs to the domain of the buddhas alone, and is not known to any śrāvaka or pratyekabuddha."

Who Receives This Bliss? And Is Empty Space the Same as the Tathāgata?

Chinese Source

迦葉復言:「如佛所說,畢竟安樂名涅槃者,是義云何?夫涅槃者捨身捨智,若捨身智,誰當受樂?」佛言:「善男子!譬如有人,食已心悶,出外欲吐,既得吐已,而復迴還。同伴問之:『汝今所患竟為差不?而復來還?』答言:『已差,身得安樂。』如來亦爾,畢竟遠離二十五有,永得涅槃安樂之處,不可動轉,無有盡滅,斷一切受,名無受樂。如是無受,名為常樂,若言如來有受樂者,無有是處。是故畢竟樂者,即是涅槃,涅槃者即真解脫,真解脫者即是如來。」

迦葉復言:「不生不滅是解脫耶?」「如是,如是。善男子!不生不滅即是解脫,如是解脫即是如來。」迦葉復言:「若不生不滅是解脫者,虛空之性亦無生滅,應是如來。如如來性,即是解脫。」佛告迦葉:「善男子!是事不然。」「世尊!何故不然?」「善男子!如迦蘭伽鳥及命命鳥,其聲清妙,寧可同於烏鵲音不?」「不也。世尊!烏鵲之聲比命命等,百千萬倍不可為比。」迦葉復言:「迦蘭伽等其聲微妙,身亦不同,如來云何比之烏鵲?無異葶藶比須彌山。佛與虛空亦復如是,迦蘭伽聲可喻佛聲,不可以喻烏鵲之音。」

爾時佛讚迦葉菩薩言:「善哉,善哉!善男子!汝今善解甚深難解。如來有時以因緣故,引彼虛空,以喻解脫。如是解脫,即是如來。真解脫者,一切人天無能為匹,而此虛空實非其喻,為化眾生故,以虛空非喻為喻。當知解脫即是如來,如來之性即是解脫,解脫、如來,無二無別。善男子!非喻者,如無比之物不可引喻,有因緣故可得引喻。如經中說,面貌端正猶月盛滿。白象鮮潔,猶如雪山。滿月不得即同於面,雪山不得即是白象。善男子!不可以喻,喻真解脫,為化眾生故作喻耳。以諸譬喻,知諸法性,皆亦如是。」

Ru-Yi Translation

Kāśyapa said further: "The Buddha has taught that nirvāṇa is called final and complete bliss — what does this mean? If nirvāṇa means relinquishing the body and relinquishing knowledge itself, who is left to receive this bliss?" The Buddha said: "Good son, it is like a person who, after eating, feels sick at heart, and goes outside to vomit; having vomited, he then returns inside. His companion asks him: 'Has whatever ailed you now been cured, that you have come back inside?' He answers: 'It is cured — I now feel at ease in my body.' The Tathāgata is just the same: having finally and completely left behind the twenty-five states of existence, he permanently attains the place of ease and bliss that is nirvāṇa, unmoving and unchanging, with nothing left to come to an end, every act of receiving cut off — and this is called the bliss of no receiving. This very absence of receiving is called permanent bliss; to say that the Tathāgata still receives some bliss could not possibly be right. This is why final and complete bliss is itself nirvāṇa, nirvāṇa is itself true liberation, and true liberation is itself the Tathāgata."

Kāśyapa said further: "Is being unborn and unceasing itself liberation?" "It is so, it is so, good son. Being unborn and unceasing is itself liberation, and this very liberation is itself the Tathāgata." Kāśyapa said further: "If being unborn and unceasing is itself liberation, then the very nature of empty space, likewise unborn and unceasing, should also be the Tathāgata — just as the Tathāgata's own nature is itself liberation." The Buddha said to Kāśyapa: "Good son, this is not so." "World-Honored One, why is this not so?" "Good son, the kalaviṅka bird and the jīvaṃjīvaka bird have voices of the purest, most subtle beauty — could these possibly be compared to the cawing of a crow or magpie?" "No, World-Honored One. The voice of a crow or magpie is not comparable to that of the jīvaṃjīvaka bird, not even by a factor of a hundred thousand million." Kāśyapa said further: "Since the kalaviṅka's voice is so subtle and fine, and its body is likewise unlike a crow's, how could the Tathāgata be compared to a crow or magpie at all? It would be no different from comparing a mustard seed to Mount Sumeru. The Buddha and empty space are just the same — the kalaviṅka's voice may be likened to the Buddha's own voice, but it cannot be likened to the cawing of a crow or magpie."

The Buddha then praised the bodhisattva Kāśyapa, saying: "Excellent, excellent, good son! You have now grasped well something profound and difficult to understand. The Tathāgata, at times, for a particular reason, draws on the likeness of empty space to illustrate liberation — and this very liberation is itself the Tathāgata. True liberation has no equal among any being, god or human, and this empty space is, in truth, no fitting likeness for it at all; it is only for the sake of bringing beings across that space, itself no true likeness, is used as a likeness. You should understand that liberation is itself the Tathāgata, and the Tathāgata's own nature is itself liberation — liberation and the Tathāgata admit of no duality, no distinction. Good son, as for what is not a fitting likeness — a thing that is truly beyond comparison cannot properly be illustrated by any likeness at all, though for a particular reason a likeness may still be drawn. It is as the scriptures say: a handsome face is like the moon at its fullest; a white elephant, pure and radiant, is like a snow-capped mountain — yet the full moon is not thereby identical to a face, nor is a snow mountain thereby identical to a white elephant. Good son, one cannot properly illustrate true liberation through any likeness at all — a likeness is drawn only for the sake of bringing beings across. It is through likenesses of this kind that the nature of every dharma is come to be known — every such case is just the same as this."

Reading note — Ru-Yi Meditation Center

The kalaviṅka exchange resolves an ambiguity that the preceding litany's own method had left dangerously open. Dozens of similes just concluded, each declaring some named quality — unbreakability, boundlessness, single-flavoredness — to be "true liberation," and true liberation to be "the Tathāgata." Kāśyapa's question tests whether this pattern licenses substitution in general: if X shares a described property with liberation, does X thereby equal the Tathāgata? Space and the Tathāgata share the property "unborn and unceasing," yet the Buddha rejects the inference outright, and the reason given is not that the property-match is false but that a likeness's aptness is not transitive across every shared feature — a crow's voice and a kalaviṅka's voice might both be describable as "sound produced by a bird," yet one is a fitting image for the Buddha's voice and the other is not, because the resemblance that actually matters (purity, subtlety) is present in one case and wholly absent in the other despite the shared category. The passage's closing move — that an image can be a legitimate, even necessary teaching device "for the sake of bringing beings across" precisely because, and not despite, being imperfect — retroactively reframes the entire preceding litany: none of its sixty-some similes were ever claiming point-for-point identity with liberation, only that each named feature, taken as a signpost rather than a definition, points toward a single reality no single likeness can fully capture on its own.

Two Kinds of Speech: The Sword and the Attempted Matricide

Chinese Source

迦葉復言:「云何如來作二種說?」佛言:「善男子!譬如有人,執持刀劍,以瞋恚心,欲害如來,如來和悅,無恚恨色。是人當得壞如來身成逆罪不?」「不也。世尊!何以故?如來身界,不可壞故。所以者何?以無身聚,唯有法性。法性之性,理不可壞,是人云何能壞佛身?直以惡心,故成無間。以是因緣,引諸譬喻,得知實法。」爾時佛讚迦葉菩薩:「善哉,善哉!善男子!我所欲說,汝今已說。」

「又善男子!譬如惡人欲害其母,住於野田在穀積下,母為送食,其人見已,尋生害心,便前磨刀。母時知已,逃入積中,其人持刀,遶積遍斫,斫已歡喜,生已殺想。其母尋後從穀積出,還至家中。於意云何,是人成就無間罪不?」「不也。世尊!不可定說。何以故?若說有罪,母身應壞,身若不壞,云何言有?若說無罪,生已殺想,心懷歡喜,云何言無?是人雖不具足逆罪,而亦是逆。以是因緣,引諸譬喻,得知實法。」佛讚迦葉:「善哉,善哉!善男子!以是因緣,我說種種方便譬喻,以喻解脫。雖以無量阿僧祇喻,而實不可以喻為比。或有因緣亦可喻說,或有因緣不可喻說,是故解脫成就如是無量功德。趣涅槃者、涅槃、如來,亦有如是無量功德,以如是等無量功德,成就滿故,名大涅槃。」

迦葉菩薩白佛言:「世尊!我今始知,如來至處,為無有盡。處若無盡,當知壽命亦應無盡。」佛言:「善哉,善哉!善男子!汝今善能護持正法。若有善男子、善女人欲斷煩惱諸結縛者,當作如是護持正法。」

Ru-Yi Translation

Kāśyapa said further: "How is it that the Tathāgata speaks in two different ways?" The Buddha said: "Good son, suppose a person, sword in hand, filled with murderous intent, sets out to kill the Tathāgata; and the Tathāgata, calm and at ease, shows no trace of anger or resentment at all. Would this person, in striking the Tathāgata's body, thereby commit one of the acts of gravest transgression?" "No, World-Honored One. Why is this? Because the Tathāgata's own bodily nature cannot be destroyed at all. Why is this so? Because there is, in truth, no aggregate body there to begin with — only the Dharma-nature. The Dharma-nature's own nature cannot, by its very principle, be destroyed — how, then, could this person possibly destroy the Buddha's body? It is only by the malice in his own heart that he brings the offense of unmediated retribution upon himself. It is through likenesses such as this that the true nature of things comes to be known." The Buddha then praised the bodhisattva Kāśyapa: "Excellent, excellent, good son! What I myself wished to say, you have already said."

"Furthermore, good son, suppose an evil man wishes to kill his own mother, and lies in wait beneath a haystack in an open field. His mother comes bringing him food; seeing her, he at once conceives the intent to kill, and moves forward, sharpening his blade. His mother, sensing this in time, flees and hides herself within the haystack. The man, sword in hand, circles the haystack and hacks at it on every side; having finished, he rejoices, believing he has already killed her. His mother then emerges from the haystack behind him and returns safely home. What do you think — has this man thereby committed the offense of unmediated retribution?" "No, World-Honored One — this cannot be stated with certainty either way. Why is this? If it is said he is guilty, his mother's body should have been destroyed; but since her body was not destroyed, how can he be said to be guilty? If it is said he is not guilty, he nonetheless believed he had killed her, and his heart was filled with joy at the thought — how, then, can he be said not to be guilty? Though this man has not fully accomplished the offense of unmediated retribution, his act is nonetheless of that very nature. It is through likenesses such as this that the true nature of things comes to be known." The Buddha praised Kāśyapa: "Excellent, excellent, good son! It is for this very reason that I teach every kind of skillful likeness in order to illustrate liberation. Though I draw on immeasurable, countless likenesses, liberation truly cannot be captured by any likeness at all. In some cases a likeness may still be drawn for a particular reason; in others no likeness can be drawn at all — and it is in this way that liberation comes to accomplish immeasurable virtues such as these. Whoever sets out toward nirvāṇa, nirvāṇa itself, and the Tathāgata likewise possess immeasurable virtues such as these — and it is because these immeasurable virtues are accomplished in full that it is called the great nirvāṇa."

The bodhisattva Kāśyapa said to the Buddha: "World-Honored One, I now understand for the first time that the place the Tathāgata reaches is without any limit at all. If that place is without limit, one should understand that his lifespan must likewise be without limit." The Buddha said: "Excellent, excellent, good son! You are now well able to protect and uphold the true Dharma. Any good son or good daughter who wishes to cut off every affliction and every fetter should protect and uphold the true Dharma in just this way."

Reading note — Ru-Yi Meditation Center

The pairing of these two cases is doing precise philosophical work rather than simply illustrating the same point twice. In the first case, the attacker's sword genuinely cannot succeed — the Tathāgata's body has, per the whole of this fascicle's teaching, no aggregate substance for any weapon to strike — so the case tests whether an act's moral weight depends on its physical possibility of success; the answer given is that it does not: malicious intent alone brings the gravest culpability, independent of whether the intended object could even in principle be harmed. The second case inverts the setup: the mother's body is entirely destructible, and the son's failure is purely accidental — she happens to escape, not because killing her was impossible but because she hid in time — so this case tests whether pure moral luck can clear an otherwise complete murderous intent of guilt. Kāśyapa's answer refuses a clean yes or no on the second case specifically because a clean answer either way would prove too much: calling it simply "no offense" because no one died would make outcome, rather than intent, the entire measure of the deed; calling it simply "the full offense" would erase the real moral difference between attempted and completed matricide. Read together, the two cases converge on a single principle the sūtra states through example rather than declaration: culpability tracks the intent that generates an act, but the specific classification and weight of the resulting offense still depends on what, if anything, actually happened to the object of that intent — a distinction with obvious bearing on how this sūtra elsewhere judges the icchantika, whose condition this same fascicle has just called both "incurable" and, a few lines later, always in principle reversible by a single act of faith.

Part 5 Complete

This closes Part 5 (fascicle 5 of 40), continuing 如來性品第四之二: the half-letter parable reprised for the question of secrecy, the icchantika named "incurable" and then, within the same fascicle's own litany, declared curable by a single act of faith, the sixty-some marks of true liberation each declared identical to the Tathāgata, the three refuges as one meaning under different names, the kalaviṅka bird's voice as a limit case for what a likeness can and cannot prove, and a closing pair of thought experiments on intention, possibility, and guilt. Part 6 continues 如來性品第四之三.

Continue to Part 6 →