Part 12 of 40 · Fascicle 12 · 聖行品第七之二 · 大般涅槃經 T0374 (Northern Edition)

The Goddess of Fortune, and Her Sister

This fascicle continues 聖行品 from precept-keeping into meditation: a bodhisattva's contemplation of his own body down to bare, colored bone, and a striking exception — a king who once killed a man to save the Mahāyāna teaching from slander, and did not fall into hell for it. The fascicle then turns to the Four Noble Truths, defining the eight sufferings with exacting precision before elaborating each at length through dozens of similes: two inseparable sisters, one bringing fortune and the other ruin, who never travel apart; a honey-covered cliff hiding a fatal pit; and the story of a king born from a boil on his own father's head, who conquered every human continent, ascended to the summit of the heavens, and fell the instant he coveted the throne of Śakra himself.

Translator: Ru-Yi Meditation Center Status: Part 12 of 40 Source: Taishō T0374, 大般涅槃經 (tr. Dharmakṣema, 421 CE) Reading notes after Huiyuan's 大般涅槃經義記 (T1764)

Whose Body Is This?

Chinese Source

「復次善男子!菩薩摩訶薩聖行者,觀察是身,從頭至足,其中唯有髮毛、爪齒、不淨垢穢、皮肉筋骨、脾腎心肺、肝膽腸胃、生熟二藏、大小便利、涕唾目淚、肪膏腦膜、骨髓膿血、腦胲諸脈。菩薩如是專念觀時,誰有是我?我為屬誰?住在何處?誰屬於我?

復作是念:『骨是我耶?離骨是耶?』菩薩爾時除去皮肉,唯觀白骨,復作是念:『骨色相異,所謂青黃、赤白及以鴿色,如是骨相亦復非我,何以故?我者亦非青黃、赤白及以鴿色。』菩薩繫心作是觀時,即得斷除一切色欲。復作是念:『如是骨者從因緣生,依因足骨以拄踝骨,依因踝骨以拄膊骨,依因膊骨以拄膝骨,依因膝骨以拄髀骨,依因髀骨以拄臗骨,依因臗骨以拄腰骨,依因腰骨以拄脊骨,依因脊骨以拄肋骨,復因脊骨上拄項骨,依因項骨以拄頷骨,依因頷骨以拄牙齒,上有髑髏。復因項骨以拄膊骨,依因膊骨以拄臂骨,依因臂骨以拄腕骨,依因腕骨以拄掌骨,依因掌骨以拄指骨。』菩薩摩訶薩如是觀時,身所有骨,一切分離,得是觀已即斷三欲:一形貌欲,二姿態欲,三細觸欲。

「菩薩摩訶薩觀青骨時,見此大地,東西南北、四維上下悉皆青相;如青色觀,黃白鴿色,亦復如是。菩薩摩訶薩作是觀時,眉間即出青、黃、赤、白、鴿等色光,是菩薩於是一一諸光明中見有佛像,見已即問:『如此身者,不淨因緣和合共成,云何而得坐起、行住、屈伸、俯仰,視瞬、喘息、悲泣、喜笑?此中無主,誰使之然?』作是問已,光中諸佛忽然不現。復作是念:『或識是我,故使諸佛不為我說。』復觀此識,次第生滅,猶如流水,亦復非我。

復作是念:『若識非我,出息入息或能是我。』復作是念:『是出入息,直是風性,而是風性,乃是四大,四大之中何者是我?地性非我,水火風性亦復非我。』復作是念:『此身一切,悉無有我,唯有心風因緣和合,示現種種所作事業,譬如呪力、幻術所作,亦如箜篌,隨意出聲。是故此身如是不淨,假眾因緣和合共成,而於何處生此貪欲?若被罵辱,復於何處而生瞋恚?而我此身,三十六物不淨臭穢,何處當有受罵辱者?若聞其罵,即便思惟,以何音聲而見罵耶?一一音聲不能見罵,若一不能,多亦不能,以是義故,不應生瞋。若他來打,亦應思惟,如是打者從何而生?』復作是念:『因手刀杖,及以我身,故得名打。我今何緣橫瞋於他?乃是我身,自招此咎,以我受是五陰身故。譬如因的則有箭中,我身亦爾,有身有打。我若不忍心則散亂,心若散亂則失正念,若失正念則不能觀善、不善義,若不能觀善、不善義則行惡法,惡法因緣則墮地獄、畜生、餓鬼。』菩薩爾時作是觀已,得四念處,得四念處已,則得住於堪忍地中。菩薩摩訶薩住是地已,則能堪忍貪欲恚癡,亦能堪忍寒熱飢渴、蚊虻蚤虱、暴風惡觸、種種疾疫、惡口罵詈、撾打楚撻,身心苦惱一切能忍,是故名為住堪忍地。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"Furthermore, good son, the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's own noble conduct includes this: he observes this body, from head to foot, finding within it only hair, body-hair, nails, teeth, impure filth, skin, flesh, sinew, bone, spleen, kidneys, heart, lungs, liver, gall bladder, intestines, stomach, the two receptacles of raw and digested food, urine and feces, mucus, saliva, and tears, fat, marrow, and membrane, bone-marrow, pus, and blood, brain-matter and every vessel and vein. When the bodhisattva contemplates with single-minded attention in this way, he asks: who, here, is a self? To whom does this self belong? Where does it dwell? What belongs to this self?

He then thinks further: 'Is this bone the self? Or is the self apart from this bone?' The bodhisattva, at this point, strips away the skin and flesh, contemplating only the bare, white bone, and thinks further: 'The color of this bone varies — blue-black, yellow, red, white, and dove-gray — and a bony appearance of this kind, too, is not the self. Why is this? Because the self, likewise, is neither blue-black, nor yellow, nor red, nor white, nor dove-gray.' As the bodhisattva fixes his mind and contemplates in this way, he thereby cuts off entirely his own craving for physical form. He then thinks further: 'This bone, too, arises through cause and condition — the foot bone, resting upon the ankle bone; the ankle bone, resting upon the shin bone; the shin bone, resting upon the knee bone; the knee bone, resting upon the thigh bone; the thigh bone, resting upon the hip bone; the hip bone, resting upon the waist bone; the waist bone, resting upon the spine; the spine, resting upon the ribs, and, further, resting up upon the neck bone; the neck bone, resting upon the jaw bone; the jaw bone, resting upon the teeth, above which is the skull. And, further, upon the neck bone rests the shoulder bone; upon the shoulder bone rests the arm bone; upon the arm bone rests the wrist bone; upon the wrist bone rests the bones of the palm; upon the bones of the palm rest the bones of the fingers.' As the bodhisattva-mahāsattva contemplates in this way, every bone within the body comes apart, each from the others — and, attaining this contemplation, he thereby cuts off three cravings at once: craving for outward form, craving for bearing and gesture, and craving for the subtlety of touch.

"When the bodhisattva-mahāsattva contemplates the bone as blue-black, he sees this whole earth, in every direction — east, south, west, north, and the four intermediate directions, above and below — entirely taking on this same blue-black hue; and it is just the same when he contemplates it as yellow, white, or dove-gray. As the bodhisattva-mahāsattva contemplates in this way, light of blue-black, yellow, red, white, and dove-gray streams forth from between his own eyebrows, and, within each and every one of these lights, the bodhisattva sees the form of a buddha. Seeing this, he at once asks: 'This body here, an assembly of impure causes and conditions come together — how does it come to sit, to rise, to walk, to stand, to bend, to stretch, to gaze and blink, to breathe, to weep in grief, to laugh in joy? There is no master here at all — who, then, causes it to do these things?' Having asked this, the buddhas within the light suddenly vanish from sight. He then thinks further: 'Perhaps it is consciousness that is the self, and this is why the buddhas do not answer me.' He then contemplates this very consciousness, arising and ceasing in succession, like a flowing stream — and this, too, is not the self.

He then thinks further: 'If consciousness is not the self, then perhaps the breath, going out and coming in, is the self.' He then thinks further: 'This breath, going out and coming in, is simply the nature of wind — and this nature of wind is itself one of the four great elements. Among these four great elements, which one, then, is the self? The nature of earth is not the self; the natures of water, fire, and wind, likewise, are not the self.' He then thinks further: 'This body, in its entirety, is utterly without self — there is only mind and wind, coming together through cause and condition, manifesting every kind of activity, exactly as a spell or an illusionist's trick produces its effects, or as a harp gives forth sound according to how it is played. This being so, this body, impure as it is, merely an assembly of many causes and conditions come together — where, in it, could craving possibly arise at all? Should I be reviled and insulted, where, then, could anger possibly arise? For this very body of mine, these thirty-six impure and foul-smelling substances — where, among them, is there anyone at all to receive an insult? Should I hear myself reviled, I should reflect at once: by which single sound, exactly, am I insulted? No single sound, on its own, can constitute an insult — and if one sound cannot, neither can many together. For this very reason, I should not give rise to anger at all. Should another come and strike me, I should likewise reflect: from what, exactly, does this striking arise?' He then thinks further: 'It is through the coming together of a hand, a blade or staff, and this body of mine that what is called "striking" occurs at all. For what reason, then, should I now wrongly direct my anger at another? It is, rather, this very body of mine that has brought this trouble upon itself, since I have taken on this body of the five aggregates in the first place. It is like a target: because there is a target, an arrow strikes it. My own body is just the same: because there is a body, there is a striking of it. Should I fail to bear this with patience, my mind will become scattered; and, my mind scattered, I shall lose right mindfulness; and, having lost right mindfulness, I shall be unable to discern what is wholesome from what is not; and, unable to discern this, I shall engage in unwholesome conduct; and, through this very unwholesome conduct, I shall fall into hell, among the animals, or among the hungry ghosts.' Having contemplated in this way, the bodhisattva attains the four foundations of mindfulness; and, having attained the four foundations of mindfulness, he thereby comes to abide within the ground of forbearance. The bodhisattva-mahāsattva, abiding at this ground, is thereby able to bear with patience craving, anger, and delusion, and is likewise able to bear with patience cold and heat, hunger and thirst, mosquitoes and gnats, fleas and lice, fierce winds and harsh contact, every kind of illness and epidemic, harsh and abusive speech, beating and flogging — every affliction of body and mind he is able to bear with patience — and it is for this very reason that this is called abiding within the ground of forbearance."

Reading note — after Huiyuan

Huiyuan reads this as a sequence of four contemplations rather than one continuous train of thought: the body itself, examined first for impurity and then, once the flesh is stripped away in imagination, for the emptiness even of bare, colored bone; the mind, questioned the moment the vision of buddhas within the bone-light vanishes and consciousness itself is suspected of being the self, found instead to arise and cease in succession like a flowing stream, with nothing fixed to call self at all; and feeling, traced through the breath into the four great elements themselves, none of which yields a self either. He notes the sūtra does not treat a separate, fourth contemplation of mental objects (法念處) here, since the body, feeling, and mind contemplations, taken together, already demonstrate no-self at the general level that the fourth foundation would otherwise supply on its own. The closing turn to anger is, on his reading, the whole point of the preceding analysis put to practical use: the target-and-arrow image answers the objection a hostile reader might raise against non-retaliation — not that one deserves to be struck, but that blame requires someone continuous enough to have been the deserving target in the first place, and no such fixed self was ever found in any of the three prior contemplations to bear it.

The King Who Killed for the Dharma

Chinese Source

迦葉菩薩摩訶薩白佛言:「世尊!菩薩未得住不動地,淨持戒時,頗有因緣,得破戒不?」「善男子!有菩薩未得住不動地,有因緣故,可得破戒。」迦葉敬諾:「何者是耶?」佛言:「迦葉!若有菩薩知以破戒因緣,則能令人受持愛樂大乘經典,又能令其讀誦通利、書寫經卷、廣為他說、不退轉於阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,為如是故,故得破戒。菩薩爾時應作是念:『我寧一劫若減一劫,墮於阿鼻地獄受罪,要必當令如是之人,不退轉於阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。』迦葉!以是因緣,菩薩摩訶薩得毀淨戒。」

爾時文殊師利菩薩摩訶薩白佛言:「世尊!若有菩薩,攝取護持如是之人,令不退於菩提之心,為是毀戒;若墮阿鼻,無有是處。」

爾時佛讚文殊師利:「善哉,善哉!如汝所說。我念往昔,於此閻浮提作大國王,名曰仙預,愛念敬重大乘經典,其心純善,無有麁惡嫉妬慳悋,口常宣說愛語、善語,身常攝護貧窮、孤獨,布施精進無有休廢。時世無佛、聲聞、緣覺,我於爾時愛樂大乘方等經典,十二年中事婆羅門,供給所須。過十二年施安已訖,即作是言:『師等今應發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心。』婆羅門言:『大王!菩提之性是無所有,大乘經典亦復如是。大王!云何乃令人物同於虛空?』善男子!我於爾時心重大乘,聞婆羅門誹謗方等,聞已即時斷其命根。善男子!以是因緣,從是已來不墮地獄。善男子!擁護攝持大乘經典,乃有如是無量勢力。

Ru-Yi Translation

The bodhisattva-mahāsattva Kāśyapa said to the Buddha: "World-Honored One, when a bodhisattva who has not yet attained the unshakable ground purely upholds the precepts, is there ever a cause and condition through which he might break them?" "Good son, there is: a bodhisattva who has not yet attained the unshakable ground may, given the right cause and condition, come to break the precepts." Kāśyapa said respectfully: "What is this cause and condition?" The Buddha said: "Kāśyapa, should a bodhisattva know that, through the very cause and condition of breaking a precept, he is able to cause another to receive, uphold, and delight in the scriptures of the Great Vehicle, and further cause him to recite them fluently, copy out the scriptures, explain them at length for others, and never turn back from unsurpassed, complete awakening — for the sake of this, he may indeed break a precept. The bodhisattva, at such a time, should think to himself: 'I would rather fall into the Avīci hell and receive its punishment for a full kalpa, or something less than a kalpa, than fail to ensure that such a person never turns back from unsurpassed, complete awakening.' Kāśyapa, it is through this very cause and condition that a bodhisattva-mahāsattva may come to break the pure precepts."

At that time, the bodhisattva-mahāsattva Mañjuśrī said to the Buddha: "World-Honored One, should any bodhisattva gather in and protect such a person, causing him never to turn back from the mind of bodhi — even should this be, in name, a breaking of the precepts, that he should thereby fall into the Avīci hell could not possibly be so."

The Buddha then praised Mañjuśrī: "Excellent, excellent! Just as you have said. I recall that, in ages past, I was once a great king in this Jambudvīpa, named Sunetra, who loved, cherished, and revered the scriptures of the Great Vehicle, my own heart purely wholesome, free of any coarseness, malice, envy, or stinginess, my mouth forever speaking words of kindness and goodness, my own body forever sheltering and protecting the poor and the orphaned, giving and striving diligently without ever ceasing. At that time, the world was without any buddha, śrāvaka, or pratyekabuddha, and I, delighting in and loving the Vaipulya scriptures of the Great Vehicle, served a certain brahmin for twelve years, supplying him with everything he needed. After these twelve years of giving and provision were complete, I said to him: 'You, my teacher, should now give rise to the mind of unsurpassed, complete awakening.' The brahmin said: 'Great King, the very nature of bodhi is without existence — and the scriptures of the Great Vehicle are just the same. Great King, how could you cause anyone or anything to be equated with empty space?' Good son, I, at that time, held the Great Vehicle so dear in my own heart that, hearing this brahmin slander the Vaipulya teachings, I at once, upon hearing it, cut off his very life. Good son, it is through this very cause and condition that, from that time onward, I have never once fallen into hell. Good son, protecting and upholding the scriptures of the Great Vehicle carries power of this immeasurable kind."

Reading note — after Huiyuan

Huiyuan flags an apparent mismatch worth resolving before it confuses a careful reader: Kāśyapa's question concerns a bodhisattva who has not yet attained the unshakable ground, but King Sunetra, by the sūtra's own later reckoning elsewhere, occupies a far more advanced stage — the ground of utmost love. His resolution is that the story is not offered to prove a bodhisattva at exactly Kāśyapa's stated rank did this particular thing and came to no harm; it establishes a principle wide enough to hold at every rank at once, from the least advanced bodhisattva up through a buddha's own past life without contradiction. What breaking a precept in this narrow, specific sense — for no other reason than to save the Great Vehicle's own teaching from being slandered out of a listener's hearing — earns no karmic fault regardless of who does it, because the fault a precept normally guards against was never present in the act to begin with.

Eight Kinds of Suffering, Precisely Defined

Chinese Source

「復次迦葉!又有聖行,所謂四聖諦。苦、集、滅、道,是名四聖諦。迦葉!苦者逼迫相,集者能生長相,滅者寂滅相,道者大乘相。復次善男子!苦者現相,集者轉相,滅者除相,道者能除相。

「復次善男子!苦者有三相:苦苦相、行苦相、壞苦相;集者二十五有;滅者滅二十五有;道者修戒定慧。復次善男子!有漏法者有二種:有因、有果;無漏法者亦有二種:有因、有果。有漏果者是則名苦,有漏因者則名為集,無漏果者則名為滅,無漏因者則名為道。

「復次善男子!八相名苦,所謂生苦、老苦、病苦、死苦、愛別離苦、怨憎會苦、求不得苦、五盛陰苦。能生如是八苦法者,是名為因。無有如是八法之處,是名為滅。十力、四無所畏、三念處、大悲,是名為道。

「善男子!生者出相,所謂五種:一者初出,二者至終,三者增長,四者出胎,五者種類生。何等為老?老有二種:一念念老,二終身老。復有二種:一增長老,二滅壞老,是名為老。云何為病?病謂四大毒蛇,互不調適,亦有二種:一者身病,二者心病。身病有五:一者因水,二者因風,三者因熱,四者雜病,五者客病。客病有四:一者非分強作,二者忘誤墮落,三者刀杖瓦石,四者鬼魅所著。心病亦有四種:一者踊躍,二者恐怖,三者憂愁,四者愚癡。復次善男子!身心之病凡有三種。何等為三?一者業報,二者不得遠離惡對,三者時節代謝。生如是等因緣名字,受分別病。因緣者,風等諸病。名字者,心悶肺脹,上氣咳逆,心驚下痢。受分別者,頭痛目痛、手足等痛,是名為病。

何等為死?死者捨所受身。捨所受身亦有二種:一命盡死,二外緣死。命盡死者亦有三種:一者命盡非是福盡,二者福盡非是命盡,三者福命俱盡。外緣死者復有三種:一者非分自害死,二者橫為他死,三者俱死。又有三種死:一放逸死,二破戒死,三壞命根死。何等名為放逸死?若有誹謗大乘方等般若波羅蜜,是名放逸死。何等名為破戒死耶?毀犯去、來、現在諸佛所制禁戒,是名破戒死。何等名為壞命根死?捨五陰身,是名壞命根死。如是名曰死為大苦。

「何等名為愛別離苦?所愛之物破壞離散。所愛之物破壞離散,亦有二種:一者人中五陰壞,二者天中五陰壞。如是人天所愛五陰,分別挍計有無量種,是名愛別離苦。何等名為怨憎會苦?所不愛者而共聚集。所不愛者而共聚集,復有三種:所謂地獄、餓鬼、畜生。如是三趣分別挍計有無量種,如是則名怨憎會苦。何等名為求不得苦?求不得苦復有二種:一者所悕望處求不能得,二者多役功力不得果報,如是則名求不得苦。何等名為五盛陰苦?五盛陰苦者,生苦、老苦、病苦、死苦、愛別離苦、怨憎貪苦、求不得苦,是故名為五盛陰苦。

Ru-Yi Translation

"Furthermore, Kāśyapa, there is a further noble conduct, namely the Four Noble Truths. Suffering, its origin, its cessation, and the path — these are called the Four Noble Truths. Kāśyapa, suffering has the mark of pressing distress; its origin has the mark of generating and increasing; its cessation has the mark of still extinction; the path has the mark of the Great Vehicle itself. Furthermore, good son, suffering has the mark of appearing now; its origin has the mark of turning onward into further suffering; its cessation has the mark of removing it; the path has the mark of what is able to remove it.

"Furthermore, good son, suffering has three marks: the mark of suffering upon suffering, the mark of the suffering inherent in conditioned activity, and the mark of the suffering of change; its origin is the twenty-five states of existence; its cessation is the extinguishing of these twenty-five states of existence; the path is the cultivation of moral discipline, concentration, and wisdom. Furthermore, good son, dharmas with outflow are of two kinds: those with a cause, and those with a result; dharmas without outflow are likewise of two kinds: those with a cause, and those with a result. The result of what has outflow is called suffering; the cause of what has outflow is called its origin; the result of what is without outflow is called cessation; the cause of what is without outflow is called the path.

"Furthermore, good son, eight marks are called suffering: the suffering of birth, of old age, of illness, of death, of separation from what one loves, of union with what one hates, of not obtaining what one seeks, and of the five aggregates in their full intensity. Whatever dharma is able to give rise to these eight sufferings is called their cause. Whatever place is free of these eight dharmas is called cessation. The ten powers, the four kinds of fearlessness, the three foundations of mindfulness, and great compassion — these are called the path.

"Good son, birth means the mark of emerging, and is of five kinds: first emerging, reaching completion, growing further, emerging from the womb, and the ongoing arising proper to a given kind of being. What is old age? Old age is of two kinds: aging moment by moment, and aging over the whole span of a life. It is further of two kinds: the aging of growth, and the aging of decline — this is called old age. What is illness? Illness means the four great poisonous serpents, thrown out of balance with one another; it is of two kinds: illness of the body, and illness of the mind. Illness of the body is of five kinds: caused by water, caused by wind, caused by heat, mixed illness, and adventitious illness. Adventitious illness is of four kinds: unreasonable, self-inflicted strain; a careless fall; wounding by blade, staff, or stone; and possession by ghost or spirit. Illness of the mind is likewise of four kinds: agitation, terror, grief, and delusion. Furthermore, good son, illness of body and mind together is of three kinds altogether. What are these three? The ripening of karma; the inability to remain free of harmful contact; and the changing of the seasons. Illness of this kind arises through cause and condition, and is known and distinguished by name. Its causes and conditions are illnesses such as those of wind and the like; its names are a stifled heart, a swollen chest, rising breath and coughing, a startled heart, and dysentery; and its distinguishing sensation is pain in the head, the eyes, the hands and feet, and so forth — this is called illness.

"What is death? Death means relinquishing the body one has received. This relinquishing is likewise of two kinds: death when the life-span is exhausted, and death through an external condition. Death when the life-span is exhausted is likewise of three kinds: the life-span exhausted while merit is not yet exhausted; merit exhausted while the life-span is not yet exhausted; and both merit and life-span exhausted together. Death through an external condition is, further, of three kinds: unreasonable self-inflicted death, sudden death caused by another, and death through both together. There is, further, a threefold death: death through heedlessness, death through broken precepts, and death through the destruction of the life-faculty itself. What is meant by death through heedlessness? Should anyone slander the Great Vehicle's own Vaipulya prajñāpāramitā, this is called death through heedlessness. What is meant by death through broken precepts? Transgressing the precepts established by every buddha of the past, future, and present is called death through broken precepts. What is meant by death through the destruction of the life-faculty? Relinquishing the body of the five aggregates is called death through the destruction of the life-faculty. Death, understood in this way, is called the great suffering.

"What is meant by the suffering of separation from what one loves? It is what one loves being broken apart and scattered. This being broken apart and scattered is likewise of two kinds: the destruction of the five aggregates among humans, and the destruction of the five aggregates among the gods. The five aggregates loved by humans and gods alike, distinguished and reckoned in every particular, are of countless kinds — this is called the suffering of separation from what one loves. What is meant by the suffering of union with what one hates? It is what one does not love coming together all the same. This coming together of what one does not love is, further, of three kinds: namely, hell, the hungry ghosts, and the animal realm. These three destinies, distinguished and reckoned in every particular, are of countless kinds — this, then, is called the suffering of union with what one hates. What is meant by the suffering of not obtaining what one seeks? This suffering is, further, of two kinds: seeking what one hopes for and being unable to obtain it, and expending much effort without any result — this, then, is called the suffering of not obtaining what one seeks. What is meant by the suffering of the five aggregates in their full intensity? The suffering of the five aggregates in their full intensity is itself the suffering of birth, of old age, of illness, of death, of separation from what one loves, of craving amid what one hates, and of not obtaining what one seeks — and this is why it is called the suffering of the five aggregates in their full intensity.

Reading note — after Huiyuan

Huiyuan reads the doubled fourfold gloss opening this section — suffering as pressing distress, origin, cessation, path once; then suffering as what appears now, origin as what turns onward, cessation as removal, path as the power to remove — not as redundant repetition but as two distinct angles: the first coarse and experiential, the second tracking each truth's own place in a temporal sequence, one dharma's ceasing feeding the next one's arising. He also notes that the threefold division of suffering itself (suffering upon suffering, the suffering built into conditioned activity, the suffering of change) admits several valid analytical bases in the wider commentarial tradition — by condition, by essence, by the three kinds of impermanence, or by what each level of suffering is used to reveal about the one beneath it — and does not insist on a single scheme as exclusively correct. What this whole passage supplies, on his reading, is a skeleton the rest of the fascicle will spend its full length fleshing out: every technical term defined here — the five stages of birth, the two-then-four kinds of aging, the body's five categories of illness, the threefold death — reappears as the organizing structure for the parables and similes that follow, so that a reader who has this taxonomy in mind will recognize exactly which technical category each subsequent story is illustrating.

The Goddess of Fortune, and Her Sister

Chinese Source

「迦葉!生之根本,凡有如是七種之苦,老苦乃至五盛陰苦。迦葉!夫衰老者非一切有,佛及諸天一向定無,人中不定或有或無。迦葉!三界受身,無不有生,老不必定,是故一切生為根本。迦葉!世間眾生顛倒覆心,貪著生相,厭患老死。迦葉!菩薩不爾,觀其初生,已見過患。

「迦葉!如有女人入於他舍,是女端正,顏貌瓌麗,以好瓔珞莊嚴其身。主人見已即便問言:『汝字何等?繫屬於誰?』女人答言:『我身即是功德大天。』主人問言:『汝所至處為何所作?』女人答言:『我所至處,能與種種金銀琉璃、頗梨真珠、珊瑚虎珀、車璩馬瑙、象馬車乘、奴婢僕使。』主人聞已,心生歡喜,踴躍無量:『我今福德,故令汝來至我舍宅。』即便燒香散花,供養恭敬禮拜。

「復於門外更見一女,其形醜陋,衣裳弊壞,多諸垢膩,皮膚皴裂,其色艾白。見已問言:『汝字何等?繫屬誰家?』女人答言:『我字黑闇。』復問:『何故名為黑闇?』女人答言:『我所行處,能令其家所有財寶一切衰秏。』主人聞已,即持利刀,作如是言:『汝若不去,當斷汝命。』女人答言:『汝甚愚癡,無有智慧。』主人問言:『何故名我癡無智慧?』女人答言:『汝舍中者,即是我姊。我常與姊,進止共俱,汝若驅我,亦當驅彼。』

主人還入問功德天:『外有一女,云是汝妹。實為是不?』功德天言:『實是我妹,我與此妹,行住共俱,未曾相離。隨所住處,我常作好,彼常作惡,我常利益,彼常作衰。若愛我者,亦應愛彼,若見恭敬,亦應敬彼。』主人即言:『若有如是好惡事者,我俱不用,各隨意去。』是時二女,俱共相將還其所止。爾時主人見其還去,心生歡喜踊躍無量。

是時二女復共相隨至一貧家。貧人見已,心生歡喜,即請之言:『從今已去,願汝二人,常住我家。』功德天言:『我等先以為他所驅,汝復何緣俱請我住?』貧人答言:『汝今念我,我以汝故,復當敬彼,是故俱請令住我家。』迦葉!菩薩摩訶薩亦復如是,不願生天,以生當有老病死故,是以俱棄,曾無愛心。凡夫愚人不知老病死等過患,是故貪受生死二法。

「復次迦葉!如婆羅門幼稚童子,為飢所逼,見人糞中有菴羅果即便取之。有智見已,呵責之言:『汝婆羅門,種姓清淨,何故取是糞中穢果?』童子聞已,赧然有愧,即答之言:『我實不食,為欲洗淨,還棄捨之。』智者語言:『汝大愚癡,若還棄者,本不應取。』善男子!菩薩摩訶薩亦復如是,於此生分,不受不捨,如彼智者呵責童子。凡夫之人欣生惡死,如彼童子取果還棄。

「復次迦葉!譬如四衢道頭,有人器盛滿食,色香味具,而欲賣之。有人遠來飢虛羸乏,見其飯食色香味具,即指之言:『此是何物?』食主答言:『此是上食,色香味具。若食此食,得色得力、能除飢渴、得見諸天;唯有一患,所謂命終。』是人聞已,即作是念:『我今不用色力見天,亦不用死。』即作是言:『食是食已,若命終者,汝今何用於此賣之?』食主答言:『有智之人,終不肯買。唯有愚人不知是事,多與我價,貪而食之。』善男子!菩薩摩訶薩亦復如是,不願生天,得色得力見於諸天。何以故?以其不免諸苦惱故。凡夫愚癡,隨有生處,皆悉貪愛,以其不見老病死故。

「復次善男子!譬如毒樹,根亦能殺,莖亦能殺,皮花果實悉亦能殺。善男子!二十五有受生之處,所受五陰,亦復如是,一切能殺。復次迦葉!譬如糞穢,多少俱臭。善男子!生亦如是,設壽八萬,下至十歲,俱亦受苦。復次迦葉!譬如嶮岸,上有草覆,於彼岸邊,多有甘露。若有食者,壽天千年,永除諸病,安隱快樂。凡夫愚人,貪其味故,不知其下有大深坑,即前欲取,不覺脚跌,墮坑而死。智者知已,捨離遠去。善男子!菩薩摩訶薩亦復如是,尚不欲受天上妙食,況復人中?凡夫之人乃於地獄吞噉鐵丸,況復人天,上妙餚饌而不能食?迦葉!以如是喻,及餘無量無邊譬喻,當知是生,實為大苦。迦葉!是名菩薩摩訶薩住於大乘大涅槃經,觀於生苦。

Ru-Yi Translation

"Kāśyapa, birth is the very root from which arise all seven of these other sufferings, from old age through to the suffering of the five aggregates in their full intensity. Kāśyapa, old age itself does not belong to everyone without exception — buddhas and the gods are entirely free of it, without any doubt, while among humans it is uncertain, sometimes present and sometimes not. Kāśyapa, taking on a body within the three realms, there is no being without birth — old age is not a certainty, but birth is, for this very reason, the root of everything else. Kāśyapa, the beings of the world, their minds covered over by inversion, cling with craving to the mark of birth, while dreading and detesting old age and death. Kāśyapa, the bodhisattva is not so — observing a being's very first birth, he already sees its fault.

"Kāśyapa, it is like a woman entering another's house — this woman is beautiful, her countenance lovely and radiant, her body adorned with fine ornaments. The master of the house, seeing her, at once asks: 'What is your name? To whom do you belong?' The woman answers: 'I am, myself, the great goddess of Fortune.' The master asks further: 'Wherever you go, what do you do there?' The woman answers: 'Wherever I go, I am able to give gold, silver, lapis lazuli, crystal, pearls, coral, amber, coral shell, agate, elephants, horses, and carriages, male and female servants.' Hearing this, the master's heart is filled with joy, leaping with immeasurable delight: 'It is my own merit and virtue, surely, that has caused you to come to my own house!' He at once burns incense and scatters flowers, making offerings, revering her, and bowing before her.

"He then sees, further, outside the gate, another woman, her form ugly and repulsive, her clothing tattered and worn, covered in filth and grime, her skin cracked and withered, her complexion sallow and pale. Seeing her, he asks: 'What is your name? To whose household do you belong?' The woman answers: 'My name is Darkness.' He asks further: 'Why are you named Darkness?' The woman answers: 'Wherever I go, I cause every treasure that household possesses to waste away entirely.' Hearing this, the master at once takes up a sharp blade, saying: 'If you do not leave at once, I shall take your life.' The woman answers: 'You are truly foolish, without any wisdom at all.' The master asks: 'Why do you call me foolish, without wisdom?' The woman answers: 'The one within your own house is my elder sister. I am forever together with my sister, wherever she goes and wherever she stays — should you drive me away, you must drive her away as well.'

"The master goes back inside and asks the goddess of Fortune: 'There is a woman outside who says she is your younger sister — is this truly so?' The goddess of Fortune says: 'It is truly so — she is my own sister. Wherever I go, wherever I stay, she is together with me, never once apart. Wherever we dwell, I forever bring good fortune, and she forever brings ruin; I forever bring benefit, and she forever brings decline. Should you love me, you must love her as well; should you show me reverence, you must revere her as well.' The master then says: 'If good and ill come bound together in this way, I want neither of you — go, both of you, wherever you wish.' At this, the two women, together, take their leave and return to wherever they had come from. Seeing them go, the master's heart is filled with joy, leaping with immeasurable delight.

"The two women then go on together, following one another to the house of a poor man. This poor man, seeing them, is filled with joy, and at once invites them, saying: 'From this day forward, I ask only that you two remain always in my house.' The goddess of Fortune says: 'We were just now driven away by another — for what reason, then, do you invite us both to stay?' The poor man answers: 'Since you now think kindly of me, I, for your sake, shall come to revere your sister as well — this is why I invite you both to remain in my house.' Kāśyapa, the bodhisattva-mahāsattva is just the same: he does not wish for rebirth among the gods, since birth inevitably brings old age, illness, and death along with it — and so he casts both aside together, never once holding either with a loving mind. Ordinary, foolish people do not know the fault inherent in old age, illness, and death, and this is why they crave and accept both birth and death together.

"Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like a young brahmin boy who, driven by hunger, sees an āmra fruit lying in human excrement, and picks it up at once. A wise person, seeing this, rebukes him: 'You are a brahmin, of pure lineage — why do you pick up this filthy fruit from the excrement?' Hearing this, the boy, red-faced with shame, answers: 'I truly have no intention of eating it — I only wish to wash it clean, and then throw it away again.' The wise man says: 'You are exceedingly foolish — if you intend only to throw it away again, you should never have picked it up at all.' Good son, the bodhisattva-mahāsattva is just the same, neither accepting nor rejecting this portion of birth — exactly as that wise man rebuked the boy. Ordinary people delight in birth and detest death, exactly like that boy who picked up the fruit only to throw it away again.

"Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like a person at a crossroads with a vessel filled with food, complete in color, fragrance, and flavor, wishing to sell it. A person, arriving from far away, famished, weak, and exhausted, sees this food, complete in color, fragrance, and flavor, and points to it, asking: 'What is this?' The food's owner answers: 'This is a superior food, complete in color, fragrance, and flavor. Should you eat this food, you shall gain beauty and strength, remove hunger and thirst, and come to see the gods themselves — there is only one drawback: it brings about the end of your life.' Hearing this, the person thinks to himself: 'I have no use now for beauty, strength, or seeing the gods, nor do I want death.' He says: 'If eating this food brings about the end of my life, why, then, do you sell it at all?' The food's owner answers: 'A wise person would never buy it — only a fool, not knowing this, pays me a high price for it, and eats it out of craving.' Good son, the bodhisattva-mahāsattva is just the same: he does not wish for rebirth among the gods, for beauty, strength, and the sight of the gods themselves. Why is this? Because none of it frees him from suffering and affliction. Ordinary, foolish people crave and love every place of birth, wherever it may be, because they fail to see the old age, illness, and death bound up within it.

"Furthermore, good son, it is like a poisonous tree, whose root alone can kill, whose stem alone can kill, and whose bark, flowers, and fruit can each kill as well. Good son, the five aggregates received at birth, in any of the twenty-five states of existence, are just the same — every part of them can kill. Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like filth and excrement, which stink whether there is much of it or little. Good son, birth is just the same: whether one's life-span is eighty thousand years, or as little as ten, suffering is received either way. Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like a steep cliff, covered over with grass, at whose edge there is abundant nectar — should anyone eat of it, he would gain a heavenly life-span of a thousand years, forever free of illness, at peace and full of joy. An ordinary, foolish person, craving this flavor, not knowing that a great, deep pit lies hidden just beneath, steps forward to take it, and, his foot slipping without his even noticing, falls into the pit and dies. The wise, knowing this, keep their distance and depart. Good son, the bodhisattva-mahāsattva is just the same: he does not even wish to receive the finest food of the heavens themselves, how much less anything among humans? Ordinary people even swallow balls of burning iron in hell — how much less, then, should the finest delicacies of gods and humans be beyond his eating? Kāśyapa, through similes of this kind, and countless, boundless others besides, one should know that birth is, in truth, a great suffering. Kāśyapa, this is what is called the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's own contemplation of the suffering of birth, abiding within this Mahāparinirvāṇa of the Great Vehicle."

Reading note — after Huiyuan

Huiyuan reads these six similes as building one continuous argument rather than six separate illustrations of the same point: a bodhisattva fears death and so relinquishes birth (the two sisters); he does not pursue birth the way an ordinary near-practitioner seeks rebirth as a goal in itself (the boy and the fruit); he does not manufacture karma aimed at birth the way ordinary people do (the food-seller); birth's danger is total, reaching every part of what it produces (the poison tree); its danger cannot be escaped by simply living longer or shorter (the dung); and it mixes in a false, seductive pleasure that is precisely what makes it dangerous, not despite the pleasure but through it (the cliff and its hidden pit).

On the parable of the two sisters specifically, Huiyuan is careful to locate the story's real teaching in its second half, not its first: the master's initial reaction — welcoming Fortune, driving Ruin away with a blade — is not yet the bodhisattva's own insight, only the ordinary, half-finished response of ordinary craving still operating by halves. The insight arrives only once the master learns the two are inseparable sisters and, on hearing this, refuses them both together, wanting neither — this, not the earlier instinct to keep the good half and banish the bad, is what the bodhisattva's own relationship to birth and death actually looks like. The poor man's household that follows, welcoming both sisters without discernment, exists to complete the contrast: this is ordinary beings in general, embracing birth and its inevitable decline together without ever separating the two enough to see that both, taken as a package, are what needs to be released.

The Hailstorm on the Lotus Pond

Chinese Source

「迦葉,云何菩薩摩訶薩,於是大乘大涅槃經觀於老苦?老者能為咳逆上氣,能壞勇力、憶念進持、盛年快樂、憍慢貢高、安隱自恣,能作背膢、懈怠懶惰,為他所輕。

迦葉!譬如池水,蓮花滿中,開敷鮮榮,甚可愛樂,值天降雹,悉皆破壞。善男子!老亦如是,悉能破壞盛壯好色。復次迦葉!譬如國王,有一智臣善知兵法,有敵國王拒逆不順,王遣此臣往討伐之,即便擒獲將來詣王。老亦如是,擒獲壯色,將付死王。復次迦葉!譬如折軸,無所復用,老亦如是無所復用。復次迦葉!如大富家,多有財寶,金銀琉璃、珊瑚虎珀、車璩馬瑙。有諸怨賊,若入其家,即能劫奪,悉令空盡。善男子!盛年好色亦復如是,常為老賊之所劫奪。

復次迦葉!譬如貧人貪著上膳、細軟衣裳,雖復悕望而不能得。善男子!老亦如是,雖有貪心,欲受富樂,五欲自恣,而不能得。復次迦葉!如陸地龜,心常念水。善男子!人亦如是,既為衰老之所乾枯,心常憶念壯時所受五欲之樂。復次迦葉!猶如秋月,所有蓮花皆為一切之所樂見,及其萎黃,人所惡賤。善男子!盛年壯色,亦復如是,悉為一切之所愛樂,及其老至,眾所惡賤。復次迦葉!譬如甘蔗,既被壓已,滓無復味。善男子!壯年盛色亦復如是,既被老壓,無三種味:一出家味,二讀誦味,三坐禪味。復次迦葉!譬如滿月,夜多光明,晝則不爾。善男子!人亦如是,壯則端嚴,形貌瓌瑋,老則衰羸,形神枯顇。

「復次迦葉!譬如有王,常以正法治於國土,真實無曲,慈悲好施。時為敵國之所破壞,流離逃迸,遂至他土。他土人民見已,生於憐愍之心,咸作是言:『大王!往日正法治國,不抂萬姓,如何一旦流離至此?』善男子!人亦如是,既為衰老所壞敗已,常讚壯時所行事業。復次迦葉!譬如燈炷,唯賴膏油,膏油既盡,勢不久停。善男子!人亦如是,唯賴壯膏,壯膏既盡,衰老之炷何得久停?復次迦葉!譬如枯河,不能利益人及非人、飛鳥走獸。善男子!人亦如是,為老所枯,不能利益一切作業。復次迦葉!譬如河岸臨峻之樹,若遇暴風必當顛墜。善男子!人亦如是,臨老險岸,死風既至,勢不得住。復次迦葉!如車軸折,不任重載。善男子!老亦如是,不能諮受一切善法。復次迦葉!譬如嬰兒為人所輕。善男子!老亦如是,常為一切之所輕毀。迦葉!以是等喻,及餘無量無邊譬喻,當知是老,實為大苦。迦葉!是名菩薩摩訶薩修行大乘大涅槃經,觀於老苦。

Ru-Yi Translation

"Kāśyapa, how does the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, within this Mahāparinirvāṇa of the Great Vehicle, contemplate the suffering of old age? Old age is able to bring on coughing and rising breath; it is able to destroy one's own strength and courage, one's memory and diligence, the joy of one's prime, pride and arrogance, ease and self-indulgence; it is able to bring on a bent, stooped back, indolence and laziness, and being held in contempt by others.

Kāśyapa, it is like a pond full of lotus flowers, blooming and radiant, truly a delight to behold — and then hail falls from the heavens, and every one of them is destroyed. Good son, old age is just the same, entirely able to destroy the beauty of one's youthful prime. Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like a king who has a wise minister, well versed in the art of war; when an enemy king resists and refuses submission, the king sends this minister to subdue him, and he is captured and brought before the king. Old age is just the same, seizing the beauty of one's prime and delivering it over to the king of death. Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like a broken axle, no longer of any use at all — old age is just the same, no longer of any use at all. Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like a wealthy household, rich in treasure — gold, silver, lapis lazuli, coral, amber, coral shell, agate — into which bandit-enemies break, plundering everything until it is left entirely empty. Good son, the beauty of one's youthful prime is just the same, forever plundered by the bandit of old age.

"Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like a poor person craving fine food and soft, delicate clothing, who, though he longs for them, can never obtain them. Good son, old age is just the same: though the mind still craves and wishes to enjoy wealth and pleasure, indulging freely in the five desires, it can no longer obtain them. Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like a land-tortoise, whose heart forever longs for water. Good son, a person is just the same: withered and dried out by advancing old age, his heart forever recalls the pleasures of the five desires he once enjoyed in his own prime. Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like the lotus flowers of autumn, which everyone once delighted to see, but which, once they wither and yellow, everyone comes to despise. Good son, the beauty of one's youthful prime is just the same: once loved and delighted in by all, and, once old age arrives, despised by all. Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like sugarcane, once it has been pressed — its pulp left with no flavor at all. Good son, the beauty of one's youthful prime is just the same: once pressed by old age, it is left with none of three flavors — the flavor of going forth, the flavor of reciting the scriptures, and the flavor of sitting in meditation. Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like the full moon, bright with abundant light by night, but not so by day. Good son, a person is just the same: dignified and radiant in his prime, his form and features magnificent, but withered and weak in old age, his form and spirit alike worn and haggard.

"Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like a king who forever governs his own land with the true Dharma, true and without deceit, compassionate and generous — and who is then defeated by an enemy kingdom, driven into exile, fleeing at last to another land. The people of that other land, seeing him, are filled with pity, saying together: 'Great King, you once governed your land with the true Dharma, never wronging your own people — how, then, have you come to be driven into such exile as this?' Good son, a person is just the same: once broken down by advancing old age, he forever praises the deeds he once accomplished in his own prime. Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like a lamp's wick, dependent entirely on its own oil — once the oil is exhausted, its flame cannot last much longer. Good son, a person is just the same, dependent entirely on the oil of his own youthful prime — and once this oil is exhausted, how could the wick of aging old age possibly last much longer? Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like a dried-up river, of no benefit to humans or non-humans, to birds on the wing or beasts that roam. Good son, a person is just the same: withered by old age, no longer of benefit to any undertaking at all. Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like a tree standing on a steep riverbank, certain to topple should a fierce wind arise. Good son, a person is just the same: standing upon the perilous cliff-edge of old age, once the wind of death arrives, he cannot possibly remain standing. Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like a cart with a broken axle, unable to bear a heavy load. Good son, old age is just the same, unable to receive and take in any wholesome dharma at all. Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like an infant, held in contempt by others. Good son, old age is just the same, forever held in contempt and scorn by everyone. Kāśyapa, through similes of this kind, and countless, boundless others besides, one should know that old age is, in truth, a great suffering. Kāśyapa, this is what is called the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's own contemplation of the suffering of old age, cultivating this Mahāparinirvāṇa of the Great Vehicle."

Reading note — after Huiyuan

Huiyuan reads the opening lines as laying out three categories the fifteen similes that follow all fall under — what old age directly produces (coughing, rising breath), what it destroys (eight things in sequence: strength, memory and diligence, the joy of one's prime, pride, ease, provoking a stooped back, laziness, and finally being held in contempt), and what it leaves behind. Beyond this opening frame, he does not press each simile into a separate analytical box, and treats the passage's own rhetorical strategy as cumulative rather than structural: no single image is doing unique argumentative work, and the sūtra's own point depends on the sheer accumulated weight of hailstorm, plundered treasury, dried riverbed, snapped axle, and despised infant landing together, one after another, rather than on any one of them individually. This matches a mode this fascicle has already used for the eight sufferings taxonomy itself — argument by overwhelming accumulation, trusting repetition across many registers to do what a single decisive proof could not.

The King's Minister Named Illness

Chinese Source

「迦葉!云何菩薩摩訶薩修行大乘大涅槃經,觀於病苦?所謂病者,能壞一切安隱樂事,譬如雹雨傷壞穀苗。復次迦葉!如人有怨,心常憂愁,而懷恐怖。善男子!一切眾生亦復如是,常畏病苦,心懷愁憂。復次迦葉!譬如有人,形貌端正,為王夫人欲心所愛,遣使逼喚,與共交通。時王捕得,即便使人,挑其一目、截其一耳、斷一手足,是人爾時形容改異,人所惡賤。善男子!人亦如是,雖復身體耳目具足,既為病苦所纏逼已,則為眾人之所惡賤。

復次迦葉!如芭蕉樹、竹葦蘆騾,有子則死。善男子!人亦如是,有病則死。復次迦葉!如轉輪王,主兵大臣常在前導,王隨後行。亦如魚王、蟻王、䗍王、牛王、商主,在前行時,如是諸眾,悉皆隨從,無捨離者。善男子!死轉輪王亦復如是,常隨病臣不相捨離。魚、蟻、䗍、牛、商主、病王亦復如是,常為死眾之所隨逐。

迦葉!病因緣者,所謂苦惱、愁憂悲嘆、身心不安,或為怨賊之所逼害,破壞浮囊,撥撤橋梁,亦能劫奪正念根本,復能破壞盛壯好色、力勢安樂,除捨慚愧,能為身心焦熱熾然。以是等喻,及餘無量無邊譬喻,當知病苦是為大苦。迦葉!是名菩薩摩訶薩修行大乘大涅槃經,觀於病苦。

「迦葉!云何菩薩摩訶薩修行大乘大涅槃經,觀於死苦?所謂死者,能燒滅故。迦葉!如火災起,能燒一切,唯除二禪,力不至故。善男子!死火亦爾能燒一切,唯除菩薩住於大乘大般涅槃,勢不及故。復次迦葉!如水災起,一切漂沒,唯除三禪,力不至故。善男子!死水亦爾,漂沒一切,唯除菩薩住於大乘大般涅槃。復次迦葉!如風災起,能吹一切悉令散滅,唯除四禪,力不至故。善男子!死風亦爾,悉能吹滅一切所有,唯除菩薩住於大乘大般涅槃。」

迦葉菩薩白佛言:「世尊!彼第四禪,以何因緣,風不能吹,水不能漂,火不能燒?」佛告迦葉:「善男子!彼第四禪,內外過患一切無故。善男子!初禪過患,內有覺觀,外有火災。二禪過患,內有歡喜,外有水災。三禪過患,內有喘息,外有風災。善男子!彼第四禪,內外過患一切俱無,是故諸災不能及之。善男子!菩薩摩訶薩亦復如是,安住大乘大般涅槃,內外過患一切皆盡,是故死王不能及之。

「復次善男子!如金翅鳥能噉能消一切龍魚、金銀等寶,唯除金剛不能令消。善男子!死金翅鳥亦復如是,能噉能消一切眾生,唯不能消住於大乘大般涅槃菩薩摩訶薩。復次迦葉!譬如河岸所有草木,大水瀑涱,悉隨漂流入於大海,唯除楊柳以其軟故。善男子!一切眾生亦復如是,悉皆隨流入于死海,唯除菩薩住於大乘大般涅槃。復次迦葉!如那羅延,悉能摧伏一切力士,唯除大風。何以故?以無礙故。善男子!死那羅延亦復如是,悉能摧伏一切眾生,唯除菩薩住於大乘大般涅槃。何以故?以無礙故。復次迦葉!譬如有人於怨憎中,詐現親善,常相追逐,如影隨形,伺求其便,而欲殺之;彼怨謹慎,堅牢自備,故使是人不能得殺。善男子!死怨亦爾,常伺眾生而欲殺之,唯不能殺住於大乘大般涅槃菩薩摩訶薩。何以故?以是菩薩不放逸故。復次迦葉!譬如卒降金剛瀑雨,悉壞藥木、諸樹山林、土沙瓦石、金銀琉璃一切之物,唯不能壞金剛真寶。善男子!金剛死雨亦復如是,悉能破壞一切眾生,唯除金剛菩薩住於大乘大般涅槃。復次迦葉!如金翅鳥能噉諸龍,唯不能噉受三歸者。善男子!死金翅鳥亦復如是,能噉一切無量眾生,唯除菩薩住三定者。何謂三定?空、無、相願。復次迦葉!如摩羅毒蛇,凡所觸螫,雖有良呪、上妙好藥,無如之何;唯阿竭多星呪,能令除愈。善男子!死毒所螫,亦復如是,一切醫方無如之何,唯除菩薩住於大乘大般涅槃呪。復次迦葉!譬如有人為王所瞋,其人若能以軟善語,貢上財寶,便可得脫。善男子!死王不爾,雖以軟語、錢財珍寶,而貢上之,亦不得脫。

善男子!夫死者於嶮難處無有資糧,去處懸遠,而無伴侶,晝夜常行不知邊際,深邃幽闇無有燈明,入無門戶而有處所,雖無痛處不可療治,往無遮止到不得脫,無所破壞見者愁毒,非是惡色而令人怖,敷在身邊不可覺知。迦葉!以是等喻,及餘無量無邊譬喻,當知是死,真為大苦。迦葉!是名菩薩摩訶薩修行大乘大涅槃經,觀於死苦。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"Kāśyapa, how does the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, cultivating this Mahāparinirvāṇa of the Great Vehicle, contemplate the suffering of illness? Illness is able to destroy every peaceful and joyful thing there is, just as a hailstorm damages and destroys the young grain. Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like a person with an enemy, his heart forever anxious, harboring dread. Good son, every being is just the same, forever fearing the suffering of illness, his heart filled with worry and grief. Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like a person of handsome, dignified appearance, desired by a king's own wife, who sends a messenger to summon him urgently, and has relations with him. The king, catching them, has this person seized, gouging out one of his eyes, cutting off one of his ears, severing one hand and foot — and this person's own appearance, from that time on, is entirely altered, held in contempt by everyone. Good son, a person is just the same: though his body, ears, and eyes remain whole, once he is bound and pressed by the suffering of illness, he comes to be held in contempt by everyone all the same.

"Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like the plantain tree, or bamboo, reed, or the muñja grass, which die once they bear fruit. Good son, a person is just the same: once illness comes, death follows. Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like a cakravartin king, whose commanding minister of arms always leads the way before him, the king himself following behind; or like the king of fish, the king of ants, the king of bees, the king of cattle, or a caravan's leader, in front of whom, wherever they go, their whole following goes as well, never once left behind. Good son, the king of death is just the same, forever accompanied by his own minister, Illness, never once parting from him. And fish, ants, bees, cattle, or a caravan — their king, Illness, is just the same, forever followed and pursued by his own crowd of Death.

"Kāśyapa, the very causes and conditions of illness are suffering and affliction, worry, grief, and lamentation, unease of body and mind, being pressed and harmed as though by a bandit-enemy, tearing apart one's own floating bag, and dismantling one's own bridge; it is able to plunder the very root of right mindfulness, and further able to destroy the beauty of one's youthful prime, one's strength and ease, stripping away shame and conscience, and setting body and mind alike ablaze with feverish heat. Through similes of this kind, and countless, boundless others besides, one should know that the suffering of illness is a great suffering. Kāśyapa, this is what is called the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's own contemplation of the suffering of illness, cultivating this Mahāparinirvāṇa of the Great Vehicle.

"Kāśyapa, how does the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, cultivating this Mahāparinirvāṇa of the Great Vehicle, contemplate the suffering of death? Death is what burns and extinguishes everything. Kāśyapa, it is like the great conflagration that arises at the end of an age, able to burn everything — excepting only the second dhyāna, which its power cannot reach. Good son, the fire of death is just the same, able to burn everything — excepting only the bodhisattva abiding within this Mahāparinirvāṇa of the Great Vehicle, whom its force cannot reach. Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like the great flood that arises at the end of an age, sweeping everything away and submerging it — excepting only the third dhyāna, which its power cannot reach. Good son, the flood of death is just the same, sweeping everything away and submerging it — excepting only the bodhisattva abiding within this Mahāparinirvāṇa of the Great Vehicle. Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like the great windstorm that arises at the end of an age, able to blow everything apart, scattering and destroying it — excepting only the fourth dhyāna, which its power cannot reach. Good son, the wind of death is just the same, able to blow away and destroy everything there is — excepting only the bodhisattva abiding within this Mahāparinirvāṇa of the Great Vehicle."

The bodhisattva Kāśyapa said to the Buddha: "World-Honored One, for what cause and condition is the fourth dhyāna one which wind cannot blow apart, water cannot sweep away, and fire cannot burn?" The Buddha said to Kāśyapa: "Good son, the fourth dhyāna is entirely free of fault, both inward and outward. Good son, the first dhyāna's own fault is that, inwardly, it still has coarse and subtle thought, and, outwardly, is reached by the great conflagration. The second dhyāna's own fault is that, inwardly, it still has rapture, and, outwardly, is reached by the great flood. The third dhyāna's own fault is that, inwardly, it still has respiration, and, outwardly, is reached by the great windstorm. Good son, the fourth dhyāna is entirely free of fault, both inward and outward together, and this is why none of these three disasters can ever reach it. Good son, the bodhisattva-mahāsattva is just the same: abiding securely within this Mahāparinirvāṇa of the Great Vehicle, he is entirely free of fault, both inward and outward, and this is why the king of death can never reach him.

"Furthermore, good son, it is like the garuḍa bird, able to devour and dissolve every nāga, fish, and treasure of gold and silver, excepting only vajra, which it cannot dissolve. Good son, the garuḍa bird of death is just the same, able to devour and dissolve every being — excepting only the bodhisattva-mahāsattva abiding within this Mahāparinirvāṇa of the Great Vehicle. Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like the grasses and trees along a riverbank, swept along by a great, sudden flood, following the current out into the great ocean — excepting only the willow, on account of its own suppleness. Good son, every being is just the same, following the current out into the sea of death — excepting only the bodhisattva abiding within this Mahāparinirvāṇa of the Great Vehicle. Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like Nārāyaṇa, able to subdue every strong warrior there is, excepting only the great wind. Why is this? Because the wind meets no obstruction. Good son, the Nārāyaṇa of death is just the same, able to subdue every being — excepting only the bodhisattva abiding within this Mahāparinirvāṇa of the Great Vehicle. Why is this? Because this bodhisattva, too, meets no obstruction. Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like a person who, among his own enemies, feigns close friendship, forever pursuing his target, following him like a shadow follows its form, watching for his opportunity, wishing to kill him — but that intended victim, ever cautious, keeps himself firmly guarded, and so this person is never able to kill him. Good son, the enemy of death is just the same, forever watching for beings, wishing to kill them — excepting only the bodhisattva-mahāsattva abiding within this Mahāparinirvāṇa of the Great Vehicle, whom he can never kill. Why is this? Because this bodhisattva is never heedless. Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like a sudden downpour of vajra hail, destroying every medicinal plant, every tree, mountain and forest, every particle of earth and sand, tile and stone, gold, silver, and lapis lazuli — excepting only vajra itself, the true treasure, which it cannot destroy. Good son, the vajra rain of death is just the same, able to destroy every being — excepting only the vajra-like bodhisattva abiding within this Mahāparinirvāṇa of the Great Vehicle. Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like the garuḍa bird, able to devour every nāga — excepting only those who have taken the three refuges. Good son, the garuḍa bird of death is just the same, able to devour every one of the countless beings there is — excepting only the bodhisattva abiding within the three samādhis. What are these three samādhis? Emptiness, no-mark, and wishlessness. Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like the poisonous māra serpent, whose bite, wherever it strikes, no excellent mantra or fine medicine can counter at all — only the mantra of the star Agastya is able to cure it. Good son, the poisonous bite of death is just the same: no medical art of any kind can counter it at all — excepting only the bodhisattva who abides within the mantra of this Mahāparinirvāṇa of the Great Vehicle. Furthermore, Kāśyapa, it is like a person who has incurred a king's own wrath — should this person be able to offer gentle, pleasing words, and present treasure as tribute, he may thereby escape. Good son, the king of death is not so: though one offer gentle words, money, and every treasure as tribute to him, one can never escape him at all.

"Good son, death, in this perilous place, leaves one without any provision at all; the place it leads to is impossibly distant, and without any companion; it proceeds ceaselessly, day and night, its own limit unknown; it is deep and utterly dark, without a single lamp's light; it enters through no door at all, and yet has its own dwelling-place; though it strikes no single point of pain, it cannot be treated at all; wherever it goes, nothing can stop it, and, once it arrives, there is no escaping it; it destroys nothing visible, and yet whoever beholds it is struck with grief and anguish; it bears no wicked form, and yet still terrifies; it lies spread out beside the body itself, and yet remains entirely unnoticed. Kāśyapa, through similes of this kind, and countless, boundless others besides, one should know that death is, in truth, a great suffering. Kāśyapa, this is what is called the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's own contemplation of the suffering of death, cultivating this Mahāparinirvāṇa of the Great Vehicle."

Reading note — after Huiyuan

Huiyuan reads the illness passage as distinguishing symptom from cause more carefully than a first pass through the similes might suggest: "tearing apart one's own floating bag, dismantling one's own bridge" is not another item in a list of what illness merely feels like, but names its deeper karmic cause — reusing, quite deliberately, this same fascicle's own images from the precept-keeping section earlier (the floating bag guarded against the rākṣasa, the bridge a monastic's own discipline provides), so that illness itself is cast as what results when that guard has already failed. On the death passage, he counts twelve similes building steadily from the cosmic to the intimate — the great conflagration, flood, and windstorm that end an age, reaching every dhyāna but the fourth; the garuḍa, the flood-swept riverbank, Nārāyaṇa, the disguised assassin, the vajra hailstorm, the nāga-devouring garuḍa a second time, the incurable serpent's bite, and the king who cannot be bribed — each one naming a fresh way death seems absolute, and each one broken only by the bodhisattva abiding in this Mahāparinirvāṇa. The passage's own closing lines abandon simile altogether for a dense, riddling list of death's own qualities — no door, yet a dwelling-place; no point of pain, yet untreatable; no visible destruction, yet grief in every witness — a shift in register from illustration to something closer to a formal, almost paradoxical definition, fitting for what the whole section has been building toward: a suffering that resists every ordinary way of being pictured.

The Prince Born from a Boil

Chinese Source

「迦葉,云何菩薩摩訶薩住於大乘大涅槃經,觀愛別離苦?愛別離苦,能為一切眾苦根本,如說偈言:

『因愛生憂, 因愛生怖。 若離於愛,
何憂何怖?』

愛因緣故,則生憂苦,以憂苦故,則令眾生,生於衰老、愛別離苦,所謂命終。善男子!以別離故,能生種種微細諸苦,今當為汝分別顯示。

善男子!過去之世人壽無量,時世有王,名為善住。其王爾時為童子身,太子治事,及登王位,各八萬四千歲。時王頂上生一肉疱,其疱柔軟,如兜羅綿、細軟劫貝,漸漸增長,不以為患。足滿十月,疱即開剖,生一童子,其形端正,奇異少雙,色像分明,人中第一。父王歡喜,字之頂生。時善住王,因以國事委付頂生,棄捨宮殿、妻子、眷屬,入山學道,滿八萬四千歲。

爾時頂生於十五日,處在高樓,沐浴受齋,即時東方有金輪寶,其輪千輻,轂輞具足,非工匠造,自然成就,而來應之。頂生大王即作是念:『我昔曾聞五通仙說,若剎利王於十五日,處在高樓沐浴受齋,若有金輪,千輻不減轂輞具足,非工匠造自然成就,而來應者,當知是王即當得作轉輪聖帝。』復作是念:『我今當試。』即以左手擎此輪寶,右執香爐,右膝著地而發誓言:『是金輪寶若實不虛,應如過去轉輪聖王所行道去。』作是誓已,是金輪寶飛昇虛空遍十方已,還來住在頂生左手。爾時頂生心生歡喜,踊躍無量,復作是言:『我今定當作轉輪王。』

其後不久復有象寶,狀貌端嚴、如白蓮花,七支拄地。頂生見已復作是念:『我昔曾聞五通仙說,若轉輪王於十五日,處在高樓沐浴受齋,若有象寶,狀貌端嚴,如白蓮花,七支拄地,而來應者,當知是王即是聖王。』復作是念:『我今當試。』即擎香爐,右膝著地而發誓言:『是白象寶,若實不虛,應如過去轉輪聖王所行道去。』作是誓已,是白象寶,從旦至夕周遍八方盡大海際,還住本處。爾時頂生心大歡喜,踊躍無量,復作是言:『我今定是轉輪聖王。』

其後不久次有馬寶,其色紺炎,髦尾金色。頂生見已復作是念:『我昔曾聞五通仙說,若轉輪王於十五日,處在高樓沐浴受齋,若有馬寶,其色紺艶,髦尾金色,而來應者,當知是王即是聖王。』復作是念:『我今當試。』即執香爐右膝著地而發誓言:『是紺馬寶,若實不虛,應如過去轉輪聖王所行道去。』作是誓己,是紺馬寶,從旦至夕周遍八方盡大海際,還住本處。爾時頂生心大歡喜,踊躍無量,復作是言:『我今定是轉輪聖王。』

其後不久,復有女寶,形容端正,微妙第一,不長不短不白不黑,身諸毛孔出栴檀香,口氣香潔如青蓮花,其目遠視見一由旬,耳聞鼻嗅亦復如是,其舌廣大,出能覆面,形色細薄,如赤銅葉,心聰叡哲,有大智慧,於諸眾生常有軟語。是女以手觸王衣時,即知王身安樂病患,亦知王心所緣之處。爾時頂生復作是念:『若有女人能知王心,即是女寶。』

其後不久,於王宮內,自然而有寶摩尼珠,純青琉璃,大如人䏶,能於闇中照一由旬,若天降雨渧如車軸,是珠力能作蓋,遍覆足一由旬,遮此大雨,不令下過。爾時頂生復作是念:『若轉輪王得是寶珠,必是聖王。』

其後不久有主藏臣自然而出,多饒財寶,巨富無量,庫藏盈溢,無所乏少,報得眼根,力能徹見一切地中所有伏藏,隨王所念,皆能辦之。爾時頂生復欲試之,即共乘船入於大海,告藏臣言:『我今欲得珍異之寶。』藏臣聞已,即以兩手撓大海水,時十指頭出十寶藏,以奉聖王而白王言:『大王!所須隨意用之,其餘在者,當投大海。』爾時頂生,心大歡喜踊躍無量,復作念言:『我今定是轉輪聖王。』

其後不久,有主兵臣,自然而出,勇健猛略,策謀第一,善知四兵,若任鬪者則現聖王,若不任者退不令現,未摧伏者能令摧伏,已摧伏者力能守護。爾時頂生復作是念:『若轉輪王得是兵寶,當知定是轉輪聖王。』

「爾時頂生轉輪聖帝,告諸大臣:『汝等當知此閻浮提,安隱豐樂。然我今已七寶成就,千子具足,更何所為?』諸臣答言:『唯然,大王!東弗婆提,猶未歸德,王應往討。』爾時聖王與其七寶一切營從,飛空而往東弗婆提,彼土人民歡喜歸化。復告大臣:『我閻浮提及弗婆提,安隱豐樂,人民熾盛,悉來歸化,七寶成就,千子具足,復何所為?』諸臣答言:『唯然,大王!西瞿陀尼猶未歸德。』爾時聖王復與七寶一切營從,飛空而往西瞿陀尼。王既至彼,彼土人民亦復歸化。復告大臣:『我閻浮提及弗婆提、此瞿陀尼,安隱豐樂,人民熾盛,咸以歸化,七寶成就,千子具足,復何所為?』諸臣答言:『唯然,大王!北欝單越猶未歸化。』爾時聖王復與七寶一切營從,飛空而往北欝單越。王既至彼,彼土人民歡喜歸德。

復告大臣:『我四天下,安隱豐樂,人民熾盛,咸已歸德。七寶成就,千子具足,更何所為?』諸臣答言:『唯然,聖王!三十三天,壽命極長,安隱快樂。彼天身形,端嚴無比,所居宮殿、床榻臥具,悉是七寶。自恃天福,未來歸化。今可往討令其摧伏。』爾時聖王復與七寶一切營從,飛騰虛空,上忉利天。見有一樹,其色青綠。聖王見已,即問大臣:『此是何色?』大臣答言:『此是波利質多羅樹,忉利諸天,夏三月日,常於其下娛樂受樂。』復見白色猶如白雲,復問大臣:『彼是何色?』大臣答言:『是善法堂,忉利諸天,常集其中,論人天事。』

於是天主釋提桓因,知頂生王已來在外,即出迎逆。見已執手昇善法堂,分座而坐。彼時二王,形容相貌等無差別,唯有視眴為別異耳。是時聖王即生念言:『我今寧可退彼王位,即住其中為天王不?』善男子!爾時帝釋受持讀誦大乘經典、開示分別、為他演說,唯於深義未盡通達。以是讀誦、受持分別、為他廣說因緣力故,有大威德。善男子!而是頂生於此帝釋生惡心已,即便墮落,還閻浮提,與所愛念人天離別,生大苦惱,復遇惡病,即便命終。爾時帝釋,迦葉佛是。轉輪聖王,則我身是。善男子!當知如是愛別離者,極為大苦。善男子!菩薩摩訶薩尚憶過去如是等輩愛別離苦,何況菩薩住於大乘大涅槃經,而當不觀現在之世愛別離苦?

Ru-Yi Translation

"Kāśyapa, how does the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, abiding within this Mahāparinirvāṇa of the Great Vehicle, contemplate the suffering of separation from what one loves? The suffering of separation from what one loves is itself the very root of every other suffering, as this verse says:

'Through love, grief is born; through love, fear is born.
Were one free of love, what grief, what fear, could there be?'

It is through the very cause and condition of love that grief and suffering arise, and, through this grief and suffering, beings come to experience the suffering of aging and of separation from what they love, namely the ending of life itself. Good son, it is through separation that every kind of subtle suffering is born — I shall now explain and reveal this for you in detail.

Good son, in an age long past, when human life-spans were immeasurably long, there was a king named Sunivāsa. This king spent eighty-four thousand years as a boy, another eighty-four thousand years as crown prince managing affairs of state, and yet another eighty-four thousand years upon the throne itself. During this time, a fleshy boil grew upon the crown of the king's own head — a soft boil, like fine cotton-down or delicate kalpa-cloth, gradually growing larger, without ever causing him any trouble. When a full ten months had passed, the boil split open, and a boy was born from it, his form dignified and handsome, extraordinary and without equal, his features clear and radiant, foremost among humankind. His father the king, filled with joy, named him Mūrdhaja, "Crown-Born." King Sunivāsa then entrusted the affairs of the kingdom to Mūrdhaja, setting aside his own palace, wife and children, and household, and went into the mountains to study the path, remaining there for a full eighty-four thousand years.

At that time, on the fifteenth day, Mūrdhaja, standing upon a high tower, having bathed and observed the fasting precepts, saw a golden wheel-treasure appear from the east, its thousand spokes, hub, and rim entirely complete, made by no craftsman's hand, come into being of itself, arriving in response to him. King Mūrdhaja thought to himself: 'I once heard a sage of the five supernormal powers say that, should a kṣatriya king, on the fifteenth day, standing upon a high tower, having bathed and observed the fasting precepts, be met by a golden wheel — a thousand spokes complete, its hub and rim entire, made by no craftsman's hand, come into being of itself — one should know that this king is thereby destined to become a cakravartin, a sage-emperor who turns the wheel.' He thought further: 'I shall now put this to the test.' He at once raised up this wheel-treasure with his left hand, held an incense burner in his right, knelt with his right knee to the ground, and made this vow: 'Should this golden wheel-treasure be true, and not false, may it go forth exactly as it went for every cakravartin sage-king of the past.' Having made this vow, this golden wheel-treasure rose up into the sky, circled throughout the ten directions, and returned to rest once more in Mūrdhaja's own left hand. Mūrdhaja's heart was then filled with joy, leaping with immeasurable delight, and he said further: 'I am now, without doubt, destined to become a cakravartin king.'

Not long after this, an elephant-treasure appeared, dignified and beautiful in form, like a white lotus flower, its seven limbs planted firmly upon the ground. Seeing this, Mūrdhaja thought further: 'I once heard a sage of the five supernormal powers say that, should a cakravartin king, on the fifteenth day, standing upon a high tower, having bathed and observed the fasting precepts, be met by an elephant-treasure — dignified and beautiful in form, like a white lotus flower, its seven limbs planted firmly upon the ground — one should know that this king is truly a sage-emperor.' He thought further: 'I shall now put this to the test.' He at once raised up an incense burner, knelt with his right knee to the ground, and made this vow: 'Should this white elephant-treasure be true, and not false, may it go forth exactly as it went for every cakravartin sage-king of the past.' Having made this vow, this white elephant-treasure, from dawn until dusk, circled throughout the eight directions to the very edge of the great ocean, and returned to rest in its original place. Mūrdhaja's heart was then filled with great joy, leaping with immeasurable delight, and he said further: 'I am now, without doubt, a cakravartin sage-king.'

Not long after this, a horse-treasure appeared, its color a deep, radiant blue-black, its mane and tail golden. Seeing this, Mūrdhaja thought further: 'I once heard a sage of the five supernormal powers say that, should a cakravartin king, on the fifteenth day, standing upon a high tower, having bathed and observed the fasting precepts, be met by a horse-treasure — its color a deep, radiant blue-black, its mane and tail golden — one should know that this king is truly a sage-emperor.' He thought further: 'I shall now put this to the test.' He at once took up an incense burner, knelt with his right knee to the ground, and made this vow: 'Should this deep blue-black horse-treasure be true, and not false, may it go forth exactly as it went for every cakravartin sage-king of the past.' Having made this vow, this deep blue-black horse-treasure, from dawn until dusk, circled throughout the eight directions to the very edge of the great ocean, and returned to rest in its original place. Mūrdhaja's heart was then filled with great joy, leaping with immeasurable delight, and he said further: 'I am now, without doubt, a cakravartin sage-king.'

Not long after this, further, a woman-treasure appeared, her form dignified, subtle and wondrous, foremost of all — neither too tall nor too short, neither too pale nor too dark, every pore of her body giving off the fragrance of sandalwood, her breath as fragrant and pure as the blue lotus, her eyes able to see a full league into the distance, her ears and nose likewise able to hear and smell to such a distance, her tongue broad and long, able, when extended, to cover her own face, her form slender and delicate, like a leaf of red copper, her mind sharp and wise, possessed of great intelligence, forever speaking gentle words to every being. When this woman touched the king's own robe with her hand, she knew at once whether the king's own body was at ease or afflicted, and knew, too, what the king's own mind was dwelling upon. Mūrdhaja thought further: 'Should there be a woman able to know the king's own mind in this way, she is indeed a woman-treasure.'

Not long after this, within the king's own palace, a precious maṇi jewel appeared of itself, pure blue lapis lazuli, as large as a person's own thigh, able to illuminate a full league even in darkness; and, should rain fall from the heavens in drops as thick as a cart's own axle, this jewel's own power was able to form a canopy, entirely covering a full league of ground, warding off this great rain, never letting it fall through. Mūrdhaja thought further: 'Should a cakravartin king obtain a jewel-treasure of this kind, he is surely a sage-emperor.'

Not long after this, a treasurer-minister appeared of himself, abundant in wealth and treasure, of boundless riches, his storehouses filled to overflowing, lacking nothing at all, having obtained, as the fruit of his own past deeds, an eye able to see clearly through the earth to every buried treasure within it, able to procure at once whatever the king might wish for. Mūrdhaja, wishing to test him further, boarded a ship with him and went out onto the great ocean, saying to this treasurer-minister: 'I now wish to obtain some rare and wondrous treasure.' Hearing this, the treasurer-minister at once stirred the waters of the great ocean with both hands, and, from the tips of his own ten fingers, ten treasuries of jewels emerged, which he offered to the sage-king, saying: 'Great King, take and use whatever you need of these — as for the rest, I shall cast it back into the great ocean.' Mūrdhaja's heart was then filled with great joy, leaping with immeasurable delight, and he thought to himself further: 'I am now, without doubt, a cakravartin sage-king.'

Not long after this, a general-minister appeared of himself, brave, strong, fierce, and bold, his strategy foremost of all, well versed in every one of the four divisions of the army — presenting to the sage-king only those soldiers fit for battle, withdrawing and never presenting those unfit, able to subdue whatever remained unsubdued, and able to protect and defend whatever had already been subdued. Mūrdhaja thought further: 'Should a cakravartin king obtain a general-treasure of this kind, one should know that he is surely a cakravartin sage-king.'

"Mūrdhaja, the cakravartin sage-emperor, then said to his assembled ministers: 'You should know that this Jambudvīpa is now at peace, prosperous and joyful. And I have now already accomplished the seven treasures, and possess a full thousand sons besides — what more is there left to do?' The ministers answered: 'Indeed, Great King — Pūrvavideha, in the east, has not yet submitted to your own virtue; the King should go and subdue it.' The sage-king then, together with all seven treasures and his whole retinue, flew through the sky to Pūrvavideha in the east, and the people of that land, rejoicing, submitted to him. He said further to his ministers: 'My own Jambudvīpa, and now Pūrvavideha besides, are at peace, prosperous and joyful, their people flourishing, all having submitted to my own virtue, the seven treasures accomplished, a full thousand sons besides — what more is there left to do?' The ministers answered: 'Indeed, Great King — Aparagodānīya, in the west, has not yet submitted to your own virtue.' The sage-king then, once more with all seven treasures and his whole retinue, flew through the sky to Aparagodānīya in the west. Once the king arrived there, the people of that land likewise submitted to him. He said further to his ministers: 'My own Jambudvīpa, and Pūrvavideha, and now this Aparagodānīya besides, are at peace, prosperous and joyful, their people flourishing, all having submitted, the seven treasures accomplished, a full thousand sons besides — what more is there left to do?' The ministers answered: 'Indeed, Great King — Uttarakuru, in the north, has not yet submitted to your own virtue.' The sage-king then, once more with all seven treasures and his whole retinue, flew through the sky to Uttarakuru in the north. Once the king arrived there, the people of that land, rejoicing, submitted to his own virtue.

He said further to his ministers: 'My own four continents are now at peace, prosperous and joyful, their people flourishing, all having submitted to my own virtue, the seven treasures accomplished, a full thousand sons besides — what more is there left to do?' The ministers answered: 'Indeed, sage-king — the Trāyastriṃśa heaven, whose life-span is exceedingly long, is at peace and full of joy. The gods there, their forms dignified beyond compare, dwell in palaces, upon beds and couches, entirely made of the seven treasures. Relying on their own heavenly merit, they have not yet come to submit — the King should now go and subdue them.' The sage-king then, once more with all seven treasures and his whole retinue, flew soaring through the sky, up to the Trāyastriṃśa heaven itself. There, he saw a single tree, its color a vivid green. Seeing this, the sage-king asked his ministers: 'What is this color?' The ministers answered: 'This is the pārijāta tree — the gods of Trāyastriṃśa, throughout the three months of summer, forever take their pleasure and delight beneath it.' He then saw a white color, like a white cloud, and asked his ministers further: 'What is that?' The ministers answered: 'That is the Hall of Wholesome Dharma — the gods of Trāyastriṃśa forever gather within it, discussing the affairs of gods and humans.'

At this, Śakra, lord of the gods, knowing that King Mūrdhaja had arrived and was waiting outside, went out at once to receive him. Seeing him, Śakra took his hand and ascended with him to the Hall of Wholesome Dharma, and shared his own seat with him. At that time, these two kings, in form and appearance, were entirely without difference from one another — only their manner of gazing and blinking set them apart at all. The sage-king then gave rise to this very thought: 'Should I not now step down from my own kingship, and dwell here instead, becoming a king of the gods myself?' Good son, at that time, Śakra himself received, upheld, recited, opened up, and explained the scriptures of the Great Vehicle for the sake of others — though, with regard to their deepest meaning, he had not yet fully penetrated it. It was through the very power of this reciting, upholding, explaining, and teaching at length for others that he possessed such great, majestic virtue. Good son, but Mūrdhaja, giving rise to a wicked thought toward this very Śakra, at once fell from that place, tumbling back down to Jambudvīpa, parted from the gods and humans he had so loved, and, overcome with great anguish, fell further into a grave illness, and thereupon died. That Śakra, at that time, was none other than the buddha Kāśyapa. That cakravartin sage-king was none other than myself. Good son, you should know that separation from what one loves, of this kind, is a suffering of the very gravest kind. Good son, if the bodhisattva-mahāsattva still recalls, even now, past sufferings of separation such as this, how much more, then, should a bodhisattva abiding within this Mahāparinirvāṇa of the Great Vehicle fail to contemplate the very same suffering of separation in the present age?"

Reading note — after Huiyuan

Huiyuan reads this narrative's own function simply: it uses the past to illuminate the present, offered as the Buddha's own firsthand memory rather than a fable told about someone else, so that the closing line lands with the full weight of testimony — if even the Buddha himself, recalling this life, still holds its lesson in mind, how much more should a bodhisattva now attend to the very same suffering.

The story's own structure carries the argument as much as its moral does. Each of the seven treasures arrives, and each time Mūrdhaja tests it and finds it genuine, his own satisfaction lasts only until the next want presents itself — a golden wheel gives way to wanting an elephant, then a horse, a wife, a jewel, a treasurer, a general, and only then, once every treasure is in hand, does the appetite turn outward, continent by continent, each conquest immediately followed by the same question — "what more is there left to do?" — until there is no more Jambudvīpa left to conquer, and the craving simply continues past the edge of the human world into heaven itself. The fall, when it comes, is triggered by nothing external at all — no war, no rival, no accident — only a single covetous thought toward a throne Mūrdhaja was already, in every visible respect, indistinguishable from occupying. Read against this fascicle's own sustained argument that suffering's deepest root is a disposition of mind rather than any particular circumstance, the story supplies its most complete illustration yet: a being who wanted for nothing at all, brought down by wanting one thing more.

Is There Any Pleasure in This at All?

Chinese Source

「善男子!云何菩薩摩訶薩修行大乘大涅槃經,觀怨憎會苦?善男子!是菩薩摩訶薩觀於地獄、畜生、餓鬼、人中、天上,皆有如是怨憎會苦。譬如人觀牢獄、繫閉、枷鎖、杻械以為大苦。菩薩摩訶薩亦復如是,觀於五道一切受生,悉是怨憎合會大苦。復次善男子!譬如有人,常畏怨家、枷鎖、杻械,捨離父母、妻子,眷屬、珍寶產業,而遠逃避。善男子!菩薩摩訶薩亦復如是,怖畏生死,具足修行六波羅蜜,入於涅槃。迦葉!是名菩薩摩訶薩修行大乘大般涅槃,觀怨憎會苦。

「善男子!云何菩薩修行大乘大般涅槃,觀求不得苦?求者一切盡求。盡求者有二種:一求善法,二求不善法。善法未得苦,惡法未離苦,是則略說五盛陰苦。迦葉!是名苦諦。」

爾時迦葉菩薩摩訶薩白佛言:「世尊!如佛所說,五盛陰苦,是義不然。何以故?如佛往昔告釋摩男:『若色苦者,一切眾生不應求色,若有求者,則不名苦。』如佛告諸比丘:『有三種受:苦受、樂受、不苦不樂受。』如佛先為諸比丘說:『若有人能修行善法,則得受樂。』又如佛說:『於善道中六觸受樂,眼見好色是則為樂,耳、鼻、舌、身、意思好法,亦復如是。』如佛說偈:

「『持戒則為樂, 身不受眾苦,
睡眠得安隱, 寤則心歡喜。

若受衣食時, 誦習而經行,
獨處於山林, 如是為最樂。

若能於眾生, 晝夜常修慈,
因是得常樂, 以不惱他故。

少欲知足樂, 多聞分別樂,
無著阿羅漢, 亦名為受樂。

菩薩摩訶薩, 畢竟到彼岸,
所作眾事辦, 是名為最樂。』

「世尊!如諸經中所說樂相,其義如是。如佛今說,云何當與此義相應?」

佛告迦葉:「善哉,善哉!善男子!善能諮問如來是義。善男子!一切眾生於下苦中,橫生樂想。是故我今所說苦相,與本不異。」爾時迦葉菩薩白佛言:「如佛所說,於下苦中生樂想者,下生、下老、下病、下死、下愛別離、下求不得、下怨憎會、下五盛陰,如是等苦亦應有樂。世尊!下生者,所謂三惡趣。中生者,所謂人中。上生者,所謂天上。若復有人作如是問:『若於下樂生於苦想,於中樂中生無苦樂想,於上樂中生於樂想。』當云何答?世尊!若下苦中生樂想者,未見有人當受千罰,初一下時已生樂想,若不生者,云何說言於下苦中而生樂想?」

佛告迦葉:「如是,如是,如汝所說。以是義故,無有樂想。何以故?猶如彼人當受千罰,受一下已即得脫者,是人爾時便生樂想。是故當知於無樂中妄生樂想。」迦葉言:「世尊!彼人不以一下生於樂想,以得脫故而生樂想。」

「迦葉!是故我昔為釋摩男說,五陰中樂實不虛也。迦葉!有三受三苦。三受者,所謂樂受、苦受、不苦不樂受。三苦者,所謂苦苦、行苦、壞苦。善男子!苦受者名為三苦,所謂苦苦、行苦、壞苦。餘二受者,所謂行苦、壞苦。善男子!以是因緣,生死之中實有樂受。菩薩摩訶薩以苦樂性不相捨離,是故說言一切皆苦。善男子!生死之中實無有樂,但諸佛菩薩隨順世間說言有樂。」

迦葉菩薩白佛言:「世尊!諸佛菩薩若隨俗說,是虛妄否?如佛所說,修行善者則受樂報,持戒安樂身不受苦,乃至眾事已辦是為最樂,如是等經,所說樂受,是虛妄否?若是虛妄,諸佛世尊久於無量百千萬億阿僧祇劫修菩提道,已離妄語,今作是說其義云何?」

佛言:「善男子!如上所說諸受樂偈,即是菩提道之根本,亦能長養阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。以是義故,先於經中說是樂相。善男子!譬如世間,所須資生能為樂因,故名為樂。所謂女色、耽愐飲酒、上饌甘味,渴時得水、寒時遇火,衣服瓔珞、象馬車乘、奴婢僮僕、金銀琉璃、珊瑚真珠、倉庫穀米,如是等物世間所須,能為樂因,是名為樂。善男子!如是等物亦能生苦,因於女人生男子苦,憂愁悲泣乃至斷命。因酒甘味乃至倉穀,亦能令人生大憂惱。以是義故,一切皆苦,無有樂相。善男子!菩薩摩訶薩於是八苦,解苦、無苦。善男子!一切聲聞辟支佛等,不知樂因,為如是人,於下苦中說有樂相。唯有菩薩住於大乘大般涅槃,乃能知是苦因、樂因。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"Good son, how does the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, cultivating this Mahāparinirvāṇa of the Great Vehicle, contemplate the suffering of union with what one hates? Good son, this bodhisattva-mahāsattva observes that hell, the animal realm, the hungry ghosts, the human world, and the heavens above all alike carry this very suffering of union with what one hates — just as a person regards prison, confinement, the cangue and chain, and shackles as a great suffering. The bodhisattva-mahāsattva is just the same, observing that every rebirth throughout the five destinies is itself this very great suffering of union with what one hates. Furthermore, good son, it is like a person who, forever dreading an enemy's own household, the cangue and chain, and shackles, abandons his own parents, wife and children, household, treasure, and livelihood, and flees far away. The bodhisattva-mahāsattva is just the same: dreading birth and death, he fully cultivates the six pāramitās, and enters nirvāṇa. Kāśyapa, this is what is called the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's own contemplation of the suffering of union with what one hates, cultivating this Mahāparinirvāṇa of the Great Vehicle.

"Good son, how does the bodhisattva cultivate this Mahāparinirvāṇa of the Great Vehicle, contemplating the suffering of not obtaining what one seeks? Seeking here means seeking everything without exception. Seeking everything is of two kinds: seeking wholesome dharmas, and seeking unwholesome dharmas. Not yet obtaining a wholesome dharma is suffering; not yet being free of an unwholesome dharma is suffering — this, in brief, is the suffering of the five aggregates in their full intensity. Kāśyapa, this is called the noble truth of suffering."

At that time, the bodhisattva-mahāsattva Kāśyapa said to the Buddha: "World-Honored One, as the Buddha has taught, that the five aggregates in their full intensity are suffering — this meaning does not seem right. Why is this? As the Buddha once told Mahānāman the Śākya: 'Were physical form itself suffering, no being would ever seek it — and whoever seeks it, it could not rightly be called suffering at all.' As the Buddha has told the monks: 'There are three kinds of feeling: the feeling of suffering, the feeling of bliss, and the feeling of neither suffering nor bliss.' As the Buddha has taught the monks before: 'Should anyone be able to cultivate wholesome dharmas, he thereby comes to receive bliss.' And as the Buddha has taught: 'Within a wholesome destiny, the six contacts receive bliss — the eye seeing a fine form is itself bliss, and it is just the same for the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind, encountering a fine sound, scent, taste, touch, or thought.' As the Buddha has taught in verse:

"'Keeping the precepts is itself bliss, the body free of every suffering;
sleep brings peace and ease, and waking brings a joyful heart.

Whether receiving robes and food, reciting the scriptures, or walking in mindful practice,
dwelling alone in the mountain forest — this is the very greatest bliss.

Whoever is able, day and night, forever to cultivate loving-kindness toward every being,
thereby attains constant bliss, through never troubling another.

The bliss of few desires and contentment, the bliss of vast learning and discernment,
the arhat, free of all attachment, is likewise said to receive bliss.

The bodhisattva-mahāsattva, having reached the very far shore,
every task accomplished — this is called the very greatest bliss of all.'

World-Honored One, this is the meaning of bliss as taught throughout the scriptures. How, then, does what the Buddha now teaches accord with this same meaning?"

The Buddha said to Kāśyapa: "Excellent, excellent, good son! You have questioned the Tathāgata about this meaning well. Good son, every being, amid the lowest suffering, falsely gives rise to the notion of bliss — and this is why what I now teach about the mark of suffering does not differ at all from what I have taught before." The bodhisattva Kāśyapa said to the Buddha: "As the Buddha has taught it, that beings falsely give rise to the notion of bliss amid the lowest suffering — then the lowest birth, the lowest old age, the lowest illness, the lowest death, the lowest separation from what one loves, the lowest not obtaining what one seeks, the lowest union with what one hates, the lowest of the five aggregates — sufferings of this kind, too, should have their own bliss. World-Honored One, the lowest birth means the three evil destinies; the middle birth means the human world; the highest birth means the heavens above. Should someone then ask this: 'If, amid the lowest bliss, one gives rise to a notion of suffering, and, amid the middle bliss, one gives rise to neither a notion of suffering nor of bliss, and, amid the highest bliss, one gives rise to a notion of bliss' — how should this be answered? World-Honored One, if beings truly give rise to a notion of bliss amid the lowest suffering, one has never yet seen anyone, facing a thousand lashes, give rise to a notion of bliss at the very first lash — and if no such notion arises even then, how can it be said that beings give rise to a notion of bliss amid the lowest suffering at all?"

The Buddha said to Kāśyapa: "It is so, it is so, just as you have said. It is for this very reason that there is, in truth, no notion of bliss at all. Why is this? It is like that person, facing a thousand lashes, who, once he has received a single lash and is thereby freed of the rest, at that very moment gives rise to a notion of bliss. One should therefore know that a notion of bliss is falsely given rise to amid what is, in truth, without bliss at all." Kāśyapa said: "World-Honored One, that person does not give rise to a notion of bliss on account of the single lash itself — he gives rise to it because he has thereby been freed."

"Kāśyapa, it is for this very reason that I once told Mahānāman that there is indeed real bliss to be found among the five aggregates. Kāśyapa, there are three feelings and three sufferings. The three feelings are the feeling of bliss, the feeling of suffering, and the feeling of neither suffering nor bliss. The three sufferings are suffering upon suffering, the suffering of conditioned activity, and the suffering of change. Good son, the feeling of suffering contains all three sufferings within it — suffering upon suffering, the suffering of conditioned activity, and the suffering of change. The remaining two feelings contain only the latter two — the suffering of conditioned activity and the suffering of change. Good son, it is through this very cause and condition that there is, indeed, real feeling of bliss within birth and death. The bodhisattva-mahāsattva, since the nature of suffering and bliss never actually part from one another, says for this very reason that everything, without exception, is suffering. Good son, there is, in truth, no real bliss within birth and death at all — it is only that every buddha and bodhisattva, according with the ways of the world, speaks of there being bliss."

The bodhisattva Kāśyapa said to the Buddha: "World-Honored One, when every buddha and bodhisattva speaks according with worldly convention in this way, is this speech false? As the Buddha has taught, that whoever cultivates wholesome conduct receives a result of bliss, that keeping the precepts brings the body ease and freedom from suffering, up to every task being accomplished being the very greatest bliss — is the feeling of bliss taught in scriptures of this kind false? And if it is false, then, since every buddha, every world-honored one, has long ago, throughout countless hundreds of thousands, millions of asaṃkhyeya kalpas of cultivating the path of bodhi, already departed forever from false speech — what, then, is the meaning of teaching in this way now?"

The Buddha said: "Good son, the verses on the feeling of bliss taught above are themselves the very root of the path of bodhi, and are also able to nurture and increase unsurpassed, complete awakening. It is for this very reason that this mark of bliss is taught first, within the scriptures. Good son, it is like the world: whatever provisions one requires become a cause for bliss, and are, for this very reason, called bliss — the beauty of women, indulgence in wine, fine food and sweet flavor, obtaining water when thirsty, encountering fire when cold, clothing and ornaments, elephants, horses, and carriages, male and female servants, gold, silver, lapis lazuli, coral, pearls, granaries full of rice — things of this kind, needed in the world, become a cause for bliss, and are, for this reason, called bliss. Good son, things of this kind are equally able to give rise to suffering: because of a woman, a man may suffer, grieving and weeping even unto death; because of wine, or sweet flavor, or even a granary of rice, a person may likewise come to suffer great distress. It is for this very reason that everything, without exception, is suffering, without any real mark of bliss at all. Good son, the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, with regard to these eight sufferings, understands both suffering and the absence of suffering at once. Good son, every śrāvaka and pratyekabuddha, not knowing the true cause of bliss, is taught, for their own sake, that there is a mark of bliss amid the lowest suffering. Only the bodhisattva, abiding within this Mahāparinirvāṇa of the Great Vehicle, is truly able to know both the cause of suffering and the cause of bliss."

Reading note — after Huiyuan

Huiyuan reads Kāśyapa's challenge and the Buddha's answer as reconciling four separate earlier teachings in turn — the six contacts bringing pleasure, form itself having pleasure as taught to Mahānāman, the three feelings, and the verses praising the noble ones' own bliss — rather than as one single objection met by one single reply. His key to the whole reconciliation is the phrase "lowest suffering" (下苦): this names specifically the suffering built into conditioned activity itself (行苦), so subtle in its ordinary arising and ceasing that it goes almost entirely unfelt, unlike the gross, acute suffering the thousand-lashes analogy names. What earlier scriptures called "bliss" was never a claim that this subtle suffering had actually vanished — it was a description of exactly what happens when gross suffering lifts and only the unfelt, subtle kind remains: relief mistaken for bliss, the way the man due a thousand lashes feels relief the instant one lash ends, not because that lash itself was pleasant.

The technical resolution Huiyuan draws out is precise enough to matter: of the three feelings, the feeling of suffering contains all three kinds of suffering at once (acute suffering, the suffering of conditioned activity, and the suffering of change), while the feeling of bliss and the neutral feeling each contain only the latter two, missing the acute kind. This is why "there is real pleasant feeling within birth and death" and "everything is suffering" are both true at the same time, not a contradiction to be resolved in favor of one or the other — pleasant feeling is genuinely real as an experience, and it is nonetheless never free of the suffering of conditioned activity and change that underlies it. What every ordinary being and even the two lesser vehicles miss, on this reading, is not that pleasure exists, but what actually causes it and what it actually costs — the very thing this entire fascicle's cascade of parables, from the two sisters through the fallen king, has been teaching the bodhisattva alone to see clearly.

Part 12 Complete

This closes Part 12 (fascicle 12 of 40), continuing 聖行品第七之二: a bodhisattva's contemplation of the body down to bare, colored bone, and of consciousness and breath, none of them yielding a self; a king who broke a precept to save the Great Vehicle's own teaching from slander, and did not fall into hell for it; the eight sufferings defined with exacting precision and then elaborated through dozens of similes — two inseparable sisters named Fortune and Ruin, a hailstorm on a pond of lotus flowers, the king of death and his ever-present minister Illness, and a king born from his own father's head who conquered every human continent and fell from the summit of heaven the instant he coveted Śakra's own throne — closing on the sūtra's own careful reconciliation of why it can teach both that everything is suffering and that real pleasure exists within it. Part 13 continues 聖行品第七之三.

Continue to Part 13 →