Part 19 of 40 · Fascicle 19 · 梵行品第八之五 · 大般涅槃經 T0374 (Northern Edition)

The King Who Could Not Sleep

梵行品's sixth and final practice, sick conduct, opens with the sūtra's central illustration of it: King Ajātaśatru, having murdered his own father to seize the throne, breaks out in sores that no physician's medicine can reach, because the wound is remorse itself. Six ministers each bring him a different heterodox teacher's promise that the killing carries no consequence at all — no karma, no self to be harmed, no law above a king. The king's own physician, Jīvaka, answers not with a seventh denial but with an argument for facing the guilt honestly: two white dharmas, shame and remorse, that can save even this; a catalogue of everyone the Buddha has ever healed, however far gone; and a case, built one broken person at a time, that the true physician is still waiting twelve leagues away. The fascicle closes as a voice from the sky, warning that the Dharma itself is dying, reveals that it belongs to the king's own murdered father.

Translator: Ru-Yi Meditation Center Status: Part 19 of 40 Source: Taishō T0374, 大般涅槃經 (tr. Dharmakṣema, 421 CE) Reading notes after Huiyuan's 大般涅槃經義記 (T1764)

The Wound That Medicine Cannot Heal

Chinese Source

◎爾時王舍大城阿闍世王,其性弊惡,憙行殺戮,具口四惡,貪恚愚癡,其心熾盛,唯見現在、不見未來,純以惡人而為眷屬,貪著現世五欲樂故,父王無辜橫加逆害。因害父已,心生悔熱,身諸瓔珞伎樂不御,心悔熱故遍體生瘡,其瘡臭穢不可附近。尋自念言:「我今此身已受花報,地獄果報將近不遠。」爾時其母字韋提希,以種種藥而為傅之,其瘡遂增,無有降損。王即白母:「如是瘡者,從心而生,非四大起。若言眾生有能治者,無有是處。」

Ru-Yi Translation

At that time, King Ajātaśatru of the great city of Rājagṛha was, by nature, vicious, delighting in killing and slaughter, possessed of all four verbal evils, and consumed by greed, hatred, and delusion, his mind so ablaze that he saw only the present and never the future; he kept company solely with evil men, and, craving the pleasures of the five desires in this present life, he wrongfully turned against his own father, the king, who was entirely innocent, and had him killed. Having killed his father, a feverish remorse arose in his mind; he no longer wore his jeweled ornaments or called for music; and, because his mind burned with this remorse, sores broke out over his entire body, foul and stinking, so that no one could bear to come near him. He thought to himself: "This body of mine has already received its flowering retribution — the fruiting retribution of hell itself cannot now be far off." His mother, whose name was Vaidehī, applied every kind of medicine to the sores, and yet they only worsened, never lessening at all. The king said to his mother: "A sore of this kind arises from the mind itself, not from the four elements. Should anyone claim that any being is able to cure it, this could not possibly be so."

Reading note — after Huiyuan

Huiyuan reads this fascicle as an extended illustration of "sick conduct" (病行), the sixth and last of the five practices this collection first listed back in Part 11's opening of 聖行品 — and notes, pointedly, that the sūtra itself never labels any passage here with that name, nor closes with a summary saying so, the way it does for the other practices. His answer to why: some teachings are stated directly, and some are "shown through an event" (寄事表法) — and where a teaching works by narrative demonstration rather than direct assertion, the sūtra simply lets the story do its work and moves on, without framing it. The clue that this is what is happening, on his reading, is that the entire passage is, quite literally, the treatment of an illness — Ajātaśatru's own psychosomatic wound, which no ordinary medicine reaches because its cause is not physical at all.

He divides the king's opening condition into two layers, worth keeping distinct: first, the three underlying evils already present in his character — bodily viciousness, the four verbal faults, and a mind ablaze with greed, hatred, and delusion; and second, the specific act built from these, the patricide itself, which he traces to the same three roots (a mind "ablaze" names the hatred; seeing only the present and keeping evil company names the delusion; craving the pleasures of the present names the greed). The king's own diagnosis — "this arises from the mind, not from the four elements" — Huiyuan reads as evidence that the king already possesses real insight into his own condition, even before any of the six ministers or Jīvaka arrives to counsel him; what he lacks is not understanding that the wound is spiritual, but any correct account of what to do about it, which is exactly what the following ministers, one after another, fail to supply.

Three Ministers, Three Denials of Consequence

Chinese Source

時有大臣名曰月稱,往至王所,在一面立,白言:「大王!何故愁悴,顏容不悅?為身痛耶?為心痛乎?」王即答言:「我今身心,豈得不痛?我父無辜,橫加逆害。我從智者曾聞是義,世有五人,不脫地獄,謂五逆罪。我今已有無量無邊阿僧祇罪,云何身心而得不痛?又無良醫治我身心。」臣言:「大王!莫大愁苦。」即說偈言:「若常愁苦,愁遂增長。如人憙眠,眠則滋多。貪婬嗜酒,亦復如是。「如王所言,世有五人,不脫地獄;誰往見之,來語王耶?言地獄者,即是世間,多智者說。如王所言,世無良醫治身心者,今有大醫名富蘭那,一切知見,得自在定,畢竟修習清淨梵行,常為無量無邊眾生,演說無上涅槃之道。為諸弟子說如是法,無有黑業、無黑業報,無有白業、無白業報,無黑白業、無黑白業報,無有上業及以下業。是師今在王舍城中,唯願大王。屈駕往彼,可令是師,療治身心。」時王答言:「審能如是滅除我罪,我當歸依。」◎

Ru-Yi Translation

At that time, there was a great minister named Candraprabha, who went to where the king was, stood to one side, and said: "Great king, why are you so downcast and unwell in appearance? Is it your body that pains you, or your mind?" The king answered: "How could my body and mind not pain me? My father, entirely innocent, I wrongfully turned against and had killed. I have heard from the wise that there are, in this world, five kinds of persons who cannot escape hell — those guilty of the five gravest offenses. I have now committed immeasurable, boundless, incalculable such crimes — how could my body and mind not pain me? And I have no good physician to heal my body and mind." The minister said: "Great king, do not give yourself over to such great sorrow." And he spoke this verse: "Should one forever give way to sorrow, / that sorrow only increases and grows. / It is like a person who delights in sleep — / the more he sleeps, the more sleep he craves. / Craving lust and delighting in wine / are both exactly the same. As for what the great king has said, that there are five kinds of persons in this world who cannot escape hell — who has gone there and seen it, and come back to tell the king so? To speak of 'hell' is simply something that clever talkers among the world say. As for what the great king has said, that the world has no good physician to heal body and mind — there is now a great physician named Pūraṇa, who possesses all knowledge and vision, has attained mastery in meditative concentration, has, in the end, cultivated a pure and holy conduct, and forever expounds, for immeasurable, boundless beings, the path of unsurpassed nirvāṇa. He teaches his disciples a dharma of this kind: there is no dark karma and no fruit of dark karma; there is no bright karma and no fruit of bright karma; there is no karma both dark and bright and no fruit of karma both dark and bright; there is no superior karma and no inferior karma at all. This teacher now dwells within the city of Rājagṛha — I beg the great king to bend his own journey and go to him, so that this teacher may heal your body and mind." The king answered: "Should he truly be able to destroy my crime in this way, I shall then take refuge in him."

Chinese Source

◎復有一臣名曰藏德,復往王所,而作是言:「大王!何故面貌憔悴,脣口乾焦,音聲微細,猶如怯人見大怨敵,顏色皴裂?將何所苦?為身痛耶?為心痛乎?」王即答言:「我今身心,云何不痛?我之癡盲,無有慧目,近諸惡友而為親善,隨調婆達惡人之言,正法之王橫加逆害。我昔曾聞智人說偈:『若於父母,佛及弟子,生不善心,起於惡業,如是果報,在阿鼻獄。』以是事故,令我心怖,生大苦惱,又無良醫而見救療。」大臣復言:「唯願大王!且莫愁怖。法有二種:一者出家,二者王法。王法者,謂害其父則王國土,雖云是逆,實無有罪;如迦羅羅虫,要壞母腹,然後乃生,生法如是,雖破母身,實亦無罪。騾懷妊等亦復如是。治國之法,法應如是,雖殺父兄,實無有罪。出家法者,乃至蚊蟻,殺亦有罪。唯願大王!寬意莫愁。何以故?「若常愁苦,愁遂增長。如人憙眠,眠則滋多。貪婬嗜酒,亦復如是。「如王所言,世無良醫治身心者,今有大師,名末伽梨拘舍離子,一切知見,憐愍眾生猶如赤子,已離煩惱,能拔眾生三毒利箭。一切眾生於一切法無知見覺,唯是一人獨知見覺。如是大師,常為弟子說如是法:『一切眾生身有七分。何等為七?地、水、火、風、苦、樂、壽命。如是七法,非化非作,不可毀害。如伊師迦草,安住不動。如須彌山,不捨不作。猶如乳酪,各不諍訟。若苦若樂,若善不善,投之利刀,無所傷害。何以故?七分空中無妨礙故。命亦無害。何以故?無有害者及死者故。無作無受,無說無聽,無有念者及以教者。常說是法,能令眾生滅除一切無量重罪。』是師今在王舍大城,唯願大王!往至其所,王若見者,眾罪消滅。」時王答言:「審能如是除滅我罪,我當歸依。」

Ru-Yi Translation

There was another minister named Treasury-Virtue, who likewise went to the king, and spoke thus: "Great king, why is your face so haggard, your lips so parched, your voice so faint, your very complexion cracked and drawn, as though a timid man had seen a great and mortal enemy? What is it that troubles you so — is it your body, or your mind?" The king answered: "How could my body and mind not pain me? Blind with folly, lacking any eye of wisdom, I drew near to evil companions and made them my intimates, and, following the words of the wicked man Devadatta, wrongfully turned against the king of the true Dharma and had him killed. I once heard a wise man recite this verse: 'Should one give rise to an unwholesome thought toward one's parents, toward the Buddha, or toward his disciples, and carry out an evil act on account of it, the fruit of such a deed lies in the Avīci hell.' It is on account of this very matter that my mind is filled with terror and great anguish, and I have no good physician to come to my rescue." The great minister said further: "I beg the great king, for now, not to give way to sorrow and terror. There are two kinds of law: the law of the renunciant, and the law of the king. As for the law of the king — killing one's own father in order to rule the kingdom, though it is called a transgression, in truth carries no crime at all; it is like the kalalā insect, which must destroy its mother's own womb before it can be born — such is simply the nature of its birth, and, though it breaks its mother's body, in truth this, too, carries no crime. It is exactly the same with a mule's own pregnancy. The law that governs a kingdom is, by its very nature, of this kind — though one kills his own father or brother, in truth there is no crime in it at all. It is only the law of the renunciant where killing even a mosquito or an ant carries a crime. I beg the great king to ease his mind and not give way to sorrow. Why is this? 'Should one forever give way to sorrow, / that sorrow only increases and grows. / It is like a person who delights in sleep — / the more he sleeps, the more sleep he craves. / Craving lust and delighting in wine / are both exactly the same.' As for what the great king has said, that the world has no good physician to heal body and mind — there is now a great teacher named Maskarī Gośālīputra, who possesses all knowledge and vision, who has compassion for beings as though they were his own newborn children, who has already left affliction behind, and who is able to draw out the three poisons' own sharp arrows from beings. Not a single being possesses any knowledge, vision, or awareness with regard to any dharma at all — he alone possesses this knowledge, vision, and awareness. A teacher of this kind forever teaches his disciples a dharma of this kind: 'Every being's own body consists of seven parts. What are these seven? Earth, water, fire, wind, suffering, pleasure, and life. These seven dharmas are neither conjured nor made, and cannot be destroyed or harmed at all. Like the īṣīkā grass, they abide, unmoving; like Mount Sumeru, they are neither abandoned nor produced; like curds and whey, each remains apart from the others, without contention. Whether in suffering or in pleasure, whether wholesome or unwholesome, should a sharp blade be thrust into them, nothing at all is harmed. Why is this? Because these seven parts, being empty like space, admit of no obstruction. Life, too, cannot be harmed. Why is this? Because there exists no one who harms, and no one who dies. There is no action and no receiving of its fruit, no speaking and no hearing, no one who thinks and no one who teaches. He forever teaches this dharma, and is able to cause beings to destroy and remove every immeasurable, grave crime.' This teacher now dwells within the great city of Rājagṛha — I beg the great king to go to where he is; should the king see him, every crime shall be extinguished." The king answered: "Should he truly be able to remove my crime in this way, I shall then take refuge in him."

Chinese Source

復有一臣,名曰實得,復到王所,即說偈言:「大王何故,身脫瓔珞,首髮蓬亂,乃至如是?王身何故,戰慄不安,猶如猛風,吹動花樹?「王今何故容色愁悴?猶如農夫下種之後,天不降雨,愁苦如是。為是心痛,為身痛耶?」王即答言:「我今身心豈得不痛?我父先王,慈愛流惻,特見矜念,實無辜咎,往問相師,相師答言:『是兒生已定當害父。』雖聞是語,猶見贍養。曾聞智者作如是言:『若人奸母及比丘尼、偷僧祇物、殺發無上菩提心者、害及其父,如是之人畢定當墮阿鼻地獄。』我今身心豈得不痛?」大臣復言:「唯願大王!且莫愁苦。如其父王,修解脫者,害則有罪;若治國法,殺則無罪。大王!非法者名為非法,無法者名為無法。譬如無子名為無子,亦如惡子名之無子,雖言無子實非無子。如食無鹽,名為無鹽,食若少鹽亦名無鹽。如河無水,名之無水,若有少水亦名無水。如念念滅,亦言無常,雖住一劫亦名無常。如人受苦名為無樂,雖受少樂亦名無樂。如不自在,名之無我,雖少自在亦名無我。如闇夜時名之無日,雲霧之時亦言無日。大王!雖言少法,名為無法,實非無法。願王留神聽臣所說,一切眾生皆有餘業,以業緣故,數受生死。若使先王有餘業者,今王殺之,竟有何罪?唯願大王寬意莫愁。何以故?「若常愁苦,愁遂增長。如人憙眠,眠則滋多。貪婬嗜酒,亦復如是。「如王所言,世無良醫治身心者,今有大師名刪闍耶毘羅胝子,一切知見,其智淵深猶如大海,有大威德,具大神通,能令眾生離諸疑網。一切眾生不知見覺,唯是一人獨知見覺。今者近在王舍城住,為諸弟子說如是法:『一切眾中,若是王者,自在隨意,造作善惡。雖為眾惡,悉無有罪。如火燒物,無淨不淨,王亦如是,與火同性。譬如大地,淨穢普載,雖為是事,初無瞋喜,王亦如是,與地同性。譬如水性,淨穢俱洗、雖為是事,亦無憂喜,王亦如是,與水同性。譬如風性,淨穢等吹,雖為是事,亦無憂喜,王亦如是,與風同性。如秋髠樹,春則還生,雖復髠斫,實無有罪。一切眾生亦復如是,此間命終,還此間生,以還生故,當有何罪?一切眾生苦樂果報,悉皆不由現在世業,因在過去,現在受果。現在無因,未來無果。以現果故,眾生持戒勤修精進,遮現惡果;以持戒故,則得無漏,得無漏故,盡有漏業,以盡業故,眾苦得盡,眾苦盡故,故得解脫。』唯願大王,速往其所,令其療治身心苦痛,王若見者眾罪則除。」王即答言:「審有是師能除我罪,我當歸依。」

Ru-Yi Translation

There was another minister, named True-Attainment, who likewise came to the king, and spoke this verse: "Great king, why have you cast off your jeweled ornaments, and let your hair fall into such disarray, to such a degree as this? Why does the king's own body tremble so, unable to find peace, like a fierce wind shaking the blossoming trees? Why is the king's own complexion so sorrowful and drawn today — as sorrowful as a farmer's, after he has sown his seed, when the sky will not send down rain? Is it your mind that pains you, or your body?" The king answered: "How could my body and mind not pain me? My father, the former king, in his compassion and affection, showed me particular tenderness and love, and was, in truth, entirely without fault — and yet, when he once went to ask a physiognomist, the physiognomist answered him: 'This child, once born, is fated certainly to kill his own father.' Though he heard these words, he still raised and cared for me all the same. I once heard a wise man speak in this way: 'Whoever violates his own mother, or a nun, or steals property belonging to the Saṅgha, or kills one who has given rise to the unsurpassed bodhi-mind, or kills his own father — such a person will, in the end, most certainly fall into the Avīci hell.' How could my body and mind not pain me now?" The great minister said further: "I beg the great king, for now, not to give way to sorrow. Should one's father have been a cultivator of liberation, killing him would indeed carry a crime; but under the law that governs a kingdom, such a killing carries no crime at all. Great king — what is unlawful is called unlawful, and what has no dharma at all is called dharma-less. It is like calling a man 'sonless' when he has no son, and likewise calling a man 'sonless' when he has only a wicked son — though he is called sonless, in truth he is not without a son at all. It is like calling food 'saltless' when it lacks salt, and calling it 'saltless,' too, when it has only a little salt. It is like calling a river 'waterless' when it lacks water, and calling it 'waterless,' too, when it has only a little water. It is like calling something impermanent because it perishes, thought after thought, and calling it impermanent, too, even should it endure for an entire kalpa. It is like calling a person 'joyless' when he undergoes suffering, and calling him 'joyless,' too, even when he experiences a little joy. It is like calling something 'selfless' when it lacks mastery over itself, and calling it 'selfless,' too, even when it has a little mastery. It is like calling it 'sunless' in the darkness of night, and calling it 'sunless,' too, at a time of cloud and mist. Great king, though something is said to have but a little of a dharma, and is therefore called dharma-less, in truth it is not without dharma at all. I beg the king to attend closely to what his servant is about to say: every being possesses residual karma of every kind, and, on account of the conditions of this karma, undergoes birth and death again and again. Should your former father, the king, have possessed residual karma of his own, what crime at all could there be in the present king's having killed him? I beg the great king to ease his mind and not give way to sorrow. Why is this? 'Should one forever give way to sorrow, / that sorrow only increases and grows. / It is like a person who delights in sleep — / the more he sleeps, the more sleep he craves. / Craving lust and delighting in wine / are both exactly the same.' As for what the great king has said, that the world has no good physician to heal body and mind — there is now a great teacher named Sañjaya Vairaṭīputra, who possesses all knowledge and vision, whose wisdom is as deep and profound as the great ocean itself, who possesses great and awesome virtue, is endowed with great spiritual powers, and is able to free beings from every net of doubt. Not a single being possesses knowledge, vision, or awareness — he alone possesses this knowledge, vision, and awareness. He now dwells nearby, within the city of Rājagṛha, and teaches his disciples a dharma of this kind: 'Among all beings, whoever is a king acts entirely as he pleases, freely doing good or evil — and, though he commits every evil, none of it carries any crime whatsoever. It is like fire, which, in burning something, makes no distinction between the pure and the impure — the king is exactly the same, sharing fire's own nature. It is like the great earth, which bears the pure and the impure alike, and, in doing so, feels neither anger nor joy from the start — the king is exactly the same, sharing the earth's own nature. It is like the nature of water, which washes the pure and the impure both alike, and, in doing so, feels neither sorrow nor joy — the king is exactly the same, sharing water's own nature. It is like the nature of wind, which blows equally upon the pure and the impure, and, in doing so, feels neither sorrow nor joy — the king is exactly the same, sharing wind's own nature. It is like a tree stripped bare in autumn, which grows again once spring returns — though it was stripped and cut, in truth this carries no crime at all. Every being is exactly the same: dying here in this place, it is reborn again in this very same place — and, since it is reborn again, what crime at all could there be in this? The fruits of suffering and pleasure that every being undergoes are none of them caused by karma of the present life at all; their cause lies in the past, and it is in the present that their fruit is received. The present has no cause, and the future has no fruit. It is on account of this present fruit that beings uphold the precepts and diligently practice with vigor, so as to block off the evil fruit of the present; and, through upholding the precepts, they attain what is free of outflow, and, having attained what is free of outflow, they exhaust every karma subject to outflow, and, through exhausting this karma, every suffering comes to its end, and, through the ending of every suffering, they attain liberation.' I beg the great king to hasten to where he dwells, and let him heal the suffering of your body and mind — should the king see him, every crime shall then be removed." The king answered: "Should there truly be such a teacher, able to remove my crime, I shall then take refuge in him."

Reading note — after Huiyuan

Huiyuan identifies the six ministers as disciples, one apiece, of the historical "six heterodox teachers" (六師) — the non-Buddhist teachers the canon repeatedly names as the Buddha's own contemporaries — and gives each a one-phrase doctrinal label that clarifies what is actually being rejected in each case. Candraprabha's teacher, Pūraṇa Kāśyapa, holds the "view of emptiness" (空見): no karma is dark or bright, no act bears any fruit at all, which is why his teaching answers the king's fear of the five gravest offenses by denying that moral cause-and-effect exists in the first place. Treasury-Virtue's teacher, Maskarī Gośālīputra, holds the "view of eternalism" (常見): beings are built from seven indestructible, uncreated elements — including, notably, suffering and pleasure and life itself, listed as elements alongside earth, water, fire, and wind — so that no blade can harm what is already eternal and unchanging, which is a different route to the same practical conclusion (no real killer, no real killed). True-Attainment's teacher, Sañjaya Vairaṭīputra, holds "the view of a single cause" (一因見): whatever a person suffers now was caused entirely in the past, so a present act carries no present fruit, which lets the minister argue, alongside his separate claim that royal law and renunciant law simply differ, that the king's father must already have had residual karma calling for this very death.

Structurally, Huiyuan notes that all six ministerial visits follow an identical four-part pattern he traces through each one: the minister asks after the king's health, the king answers with his pain and names his lack of a physician, the minister opens the king's heart with an argument and then names his recommended teacher's teaching and location, and the king answers with the same tentative, conditional refrain — "should he truly be able to remove my crime, I shall take refuge in him" — a hedge, not an assent, that Huiyuan reads as evidence the king already senses something is wrong even as he cannot yet say what. On the fourth minister's argument specifically — the long chain of examples ("sonless," "saltless," "waterless," "impermanent," "joyless," "selfless," "sunless") used to prove that "a small amount of X is still properly called 'no X'" — Huiyuan treats this as sound reasoning applied to a false case: the logic itself is unobjectionable, but it is being used to argue that the king's father's supposed "residual karma," however slight, licenses calling the killing blameless, which is exactly the kind of argument this fascicle exists to expose as false comfort rather than refute point by point.

Three More Ministers, a King Beyond All Law

Chinese Source

復有一臣名悉知義,即至王所,作如是言:「王今何故形不端嚴,如失國者,如泉枯涸、池無蓮花、樹無花葉,破戒比丘,身無威德?為身痛耶?為心痛乎?」王即答言:「我今身心豈得不痛?我父先王,慈惻流念,然我不孝,不知報恩。常以安樂,安樂於我,而我背恩,反斷其樂,先王無辜,橫興逆害。我亦曾聞智者說言:『若有害父,當於無量阿僧祇劫受大苦惱。』我今不久必墮地獄,又無良醫救療我罪。」大臣即言:「唯願大王!放捨愁苦。王不聞耶?昔者有王,名曰羅摩,害其父已,得紹王位。跋提大王、毘樓真王、那睺沙王、迦帝迦王、毘舍佉王、月光明王、日光明王、愛王、持多人王,如是等王,皆害其父得紹王位,然無一王入地獄者。於今現在毘琉璃王、優陀那王、惡性王、鼠王、蓮花王,如是等王皆害其父,悉無一王生愁惱者。雖言地獄、餓鬼、天中,誰有見者?大王!唯有二有:一者人道,二者畜生。雖有是二,非因緣生,非因緣死。若非因緣,何有善惡?唯願大王!勿懷愁怖。何以故?「若常愁苦,愁遂增長。如人憙眠,眠則滋多。貪婬嗜酒,亦復如是。「如王所言,世無良醫治身心者,今有大師,名阿耆多翅舍欽婆羅,一切知見,觀金與土平等無二。刀破右脇,左塗栴檀,於此二人,心無差別,等視怨親,心無異相。此師真是世之良醫,若行、若立、若坐、若臥,常在三昧,心無分散,告諸弟子作如是言:『若自作、若教他作、若自斫、若教他斫、若自炙、若教他炙、若自害、若教他害、若自偷、若教他偷、若自婬、若教他婬、若自妄語、若教他妄語、若自飲酒、若教他飲酒、若殺一村一城一國、若以刀輪殺一切眾生、若恒河已南布施眾生、恒河已北殺害眾生,悉無罪福,無施、戒、定。』今者近在王舍城住,願王速往,王若見者,眾罪除滅。」王言:「大臣!審能如是除滅我罪,我當歸依。」

Ru-Yi Translation

There was another minister, named Knower-of-Meaning, who likewise came to the king, and spoke thus: "Why does the king's own form, today, lack all dignity and grace, like a ruler who has lost his kingdom, like a spring that has run dry, a pond without any lotus, a tree without flower or leaf, or a precept-breaking monk, whose body possesses no majesty at all? Is it your body that pains you, or your mind?" The king answered: "How could my body and mind not pain me? My father, the former king, showed me compassionate and loving care, and yet I proved unfilial, not knowing how to repay this kindness. He forever gave me peace and happiness, and yet I turned against this kindness, and instead cut off his own peace and happiness — my former father, the king, entirely innocent, I wrongfully turned against and had killed. I once heard a wise man say: 'Whoever kills his own father shall, for immeasurable, incalculable kalpas, undergo great suffering and anguish.' I shall soon, without fail, fall into hell, and I have no good physician to save and heal my crime." The great minister said: "I beg the great king to set aside his sorrow and anguish. Has the king not heard? In ages past, there was a king named Rāma, who, having killed his own father, thereby succeeded to the throne. King Bhadrika, King Vairocana, King Nahuṣa, King Kaikeya, King Viśākha, King Moonlight, King Sunlight, King Kāma, and King Dhṛtarāṣṭra — every one of these kings killed his own father and succeeded to the throne, and yet not a single one of these kings entered hell. And, among kings living now in the present — King Vaidūrya, King Udāyana, King Evil-Nature, King Mouse, King Lotus — every one of these kings, too, killed his own father, and not a single one of them has given rise to any sorrow or anguish over it. As for hell, hungry ghosts, and the heavens — who has ever actually seen them? Great king, there exist only two realms of being: the realm of humans, and the realm of animals. Though these two exist, they are neither produced by cause and condition nor destroyed by cause and condition. If there is no cause and condition, how could there be any good or evil at all? I beg the great king not to harbor sorrow and terror. Why is this? 'Should one forever give way to sorrow, / that sorrow only increases and grows. / It is like a person who delights in sleep — / the more he sleeps, the more sleep he craves. / Craving lust and delighting in wine / are both exactly the same.' As for what the great king has said, that the world has no good physician to heal body and mind — there is now a great teacher named Ajita Keśakambalī, who possesses all knowledge and vision, and regards gold and dirt as entirely equal, without any difference between them. Should a blade cut open a man's right side while his left is anointed with sandalwood paste, his mind would find no distinction whatsoever between these two men — he views friend and foe with perfect equanimity, his mind holding to no distinction between them at all. This teacher is truly the world's own good physician; whether walking, standing, sitting, or lying down, he forever abides in meditative absorption, his mind never scattered, and he tells his disciples this: 'Whether one acts oneself or teaches another to act; whether one cuts something oneself or teaches another to cut it; whether one burns something oneself or teaches another to burn it; whether one harms something oneself or teaches another to harm it; whether one steals oneself or teaches another to steal; whether one commits adultery oneself or teaches another to commit it; whether one lies oneself or teaches another to lie; whether one drinks liquor oneself or teaches another to drink it; whether one kills the people of a single village, a single city, or an entire kingdom; whether one kills every being with a wheel of blades; whether one gives generously to beings south of the Gaṅgā, or kills beings north of the Gaṅgā — none of this carries any crime or merit whatsoever, and there is no such thing as giving, moral discipline, or meditative concentration.' He now dwells nearby, within the city of Rājagṛha — I beg the king to go there quickly; should the king see him, every crime shall be removed." The king said: "Great minister, should he truly be able to remove my crime in this way, I shall then take refuge in him."

Chinese Source

復有大臣,名曰吉德,復往王所,作如是言:「王今何故面無光澤,如日中燈、如晝時月、如失國君、如荒敗土?大王!今者四方清夷,無諸怨敵,而今何故如是愁苦?為身苦耶?為心苦乎?有諸王子常生此念:『我今何時當得自在?』大王!今者已果,所願自在。王領摩伽陀國,先王寶藏具足而得,唯當快意,縱情受樂,如是愁苦,何用經懷?」王即答言:「我今云何得不愁惱?大臣!譬如愚人,但貪其味,不見利刀,如食雜毒,不見其過。我亦如是,如鹿見草,不見深穽,如鼠貪食,不見猫狸。我亦如是,見現在樂,不見未來不善苦果。曾從智者聞如是言:『寧於一日受三百鑽,不於父母生一念惡。』我今已近地獄熾火,云何當得不愁惱耶?」大臣復言:「誰來誑王,言有地獄?如刺頭利,誰之所造?飛鳥色異,復誰所作?水性潤漬,石性堅硬,如風動性,如火熱性,一切萬物自死自生,誰之所作?言地獄者,直是智者文辭造作,言地獄者為有何義?臣當說之,地者名地,獄者名破,破於地獄,無有罪報,是名地獄。又復地者名人,獄者名天,以害其父,故到人天。以是義故,婆藪仙人唱言,殺羊得人天樂,是名地獄。又復地者名命,獄者名長,以殺生故,得壽命長,故名地獄。大王!是故當知實無地獄。大王!如種麥得麥,種稻得稻;殺地獄者,還得地獄;殺害於人,應還得人。大王!今當聽臣所說,實無殺害;若有我者,實亦無害;若無我者,復無所害。何以故?若有我者,常不變易,以常住故不可殺害,不破、不壞、不繫、不縛、不瞋、不喜、猶如虛空,云何當有殺害之罪?若無我者,諸法無常,以無常故念念壞滅,念念滅故,殺者死者皆念念滅,若念念滅誰當有罪?大王!如火燒木,火則無罪;如斧斫樹,斧亦無罪;如鐮刈草,鐮實無罪;如刀殺人,刀實非人,刀既無罪,人云何罪?如毒殺人,毒實非人,毒藥非罪,人云何罪?一切萬物皆亦如是,實無殺害,云何有罪?唯願大王!莫生愁苦。何以故?「若常愁苦,愁遂增長。如人憙眠,眠則滋多。貪婬嗜酒,亦復如是。「如王所言,世無良醫治惡業者,今有大師,名迦羅鳩馱迦旃延,一切知見,明了三世,於一念頃,能見無量無邊世界,聞聲亦爾。能令眾生遠離過惡,猶如恒河,若內、若外,所有諸罪皆悉清淨。是大良師亦復如是,能除眾生內外眾罪,為諸弟子說如是法:『若人殺害一切眾生,心無慚愧終不墮惡,猶如虛空不受塵水;有慚愧者即入地獄,猶如大水潤濕於地。一切眾生悉是自在天之所作,自在天喜,眾生安樂;自在天瞋,眾生苦惱。一切眾生若罪若福,乃是自在天之所為,云何當言人有罪福?譬如工匠,作機關木人,行住坐臥,唯不能言,眾生亦爾;自在天者喻如工匠,木人者喻眾生身,如是造化誰當有罪?』如是大師,今者近在王舍城住,唯願速往,如得見者,眾罪消滅。」王即答言:「審有是人能滅我罪,我當歸依。」

Ru-Yi Translation

There was a great minister named Auspicious-Virtue, who likewise went to the king, and spoke thus: "Why is the king's own countenance so lusterless today — like a lamp lit at noon, like the moon in daytime, like a ruler who has lost his kingdom, like a wasted and ruined land? Great king, the four quarters are now at peace, free of every foe and enemy — why, then, such sorrow as this? Is it your body that suffers, or your mind? There are princes who forever give rise to this very thought: 'When shall I finally attain mastery of my own?' Great king, you have now achieved exactly this — the very mastery you once wished for. The king rules the whole kingdom of Magadha, having obtained the former king's own treasury in its entirety — you need only take your ease and give yourself freely over to pleasure. What use is there in dwelling on such sorrow as this?" The king answered: "How could I now avoid such sorrow and distress? Great minister, it is like a foolish man who craves only the flavor of his food and does not see the sharp blade concealed within it, like one who eats poisoned food and does not perceive its fault. I am exactly the same — like a deer that sees only the grass and does not see the deep pit beneath it, like a rat greedy for food that does not see the waiting cat. I am exactly the same: I see only the pleasure of the present, and do not see the unwholesome, painful fruit that is yet to come. I once heard a wise man say: 'It is better to endure three hundred piercings by an awl in a single day than to give rise to a single unwholesome thought toward one's own parents.' I have now drawn near to the blazing fire of hell itself — how could I avoid such sorrow and distress?" The great minister said further: "Who has deceived the king into saying that hell exists? The thorn's own point is sharp — who made it so? The flying bird's own varied colors — who fashioned them? Water is, by nature, moist and flowing; stone is, by nature, hard and firm; wind is, by nature, moving; fire is, by nature, hot — every single thing in the world dies of itself and is born of itself; who has made any of this? To speak of 'hell' is nothing but a fabrication of clever rhetoricians — what meaning at all could speaking of hell possibly have? Let your servant explain it: 'earth' (地) means the ground, and 'prison' (獄) means to break; breaking free of the underworld carries no retribution for any crime — this is what is meant by 'hell' (地獄). And, further, 'earth' means human, and 'prison' means heaven; having killed his own father, he thereby arrives among gods and men — it is for this very reason that the sage Vāsu proclaimed that killing a sheep brings the pleasures of gods and men, and this, too, is what is meant by 'hell.' And, further, 'earth' means life, and 'prison' means long; through killing living beings, one obtains a long lifespan — this, too, is what is meant by 'hell.' Great king, you should therefore know that no hell exists in reality at all. Great king, it is like sowing wheat and reaping wheat, sowing rice and reaping rice — one who kills a denizen of hell shall in turn become a denizen of hell, and one who kills a human being shall in turn become a human being once more. Great king, hear now what your servant has to say: there is, in reality, no killing at all. Should a self exist, then, in reality, nothing at all is harmed; and should no self exist, then, likewise, there is nothing at all that is harmed. Why is this? Should a self exist, it would forever remain unchanging, and, being ever-abiding, could not be killed or harmed at all — unbreakable, indestructible, unbound, unfettered, without anger, without joy, just like empty space — how, then, could there be any crime of killing or harming at all? And should no self exist, then every dharma is impermanent, and, being impermanent, perishes thought after thought — and, perishing thought after thought, both the killer and the one killed alike perish thought after thought — and, if they perish thought after thought, who, then, could bear any crime at all? Great king, it is like fire burning wood — the fire itself carries no crime; like an axe felling a tree — the axe itself carries no crime; like a sickle cutting grass — the sickle itself carries no crime whatsoever; like a blade killing a man — the blade itself is not the man, and, the blade carrying no crime, how could the man himself carry any crime? Like poison killing a man — the poison itself is not the man, and the poison itself carries no crime — how could the man himself carry any crime? Every single thing is exactly the same: there is, in reality, no killing or harming at all — how, then, could there be any crime? I beg the great king not to give rise to sorrow and distress. Why is this? 'Should one forever give way to sorrow, / that sorrow only increases and grows. / It is like a person who delights in sleep — / the more he sleeps, the more sleep he craves. / Craving lust and delighting in wine / are both exactly the same.' As for what the great king has said, that the world has no good physician to heal an evil karma — there is now a great teacher named Kakuda Kātyāyana, who possesses all knowledge and vision, who understands clearly the three time-periods, and who, in the space of a single thought, is able to see immeasurable, boundless worlds, and to hear their every sound as well. He is able to cause beings to keep far away from every fault and evil, just as the Gaṅgā, whether within itself or without, keeps every one of its own impurities entirely clean. This great and excellent teacher is exactly the same: he is able to remove every internal and external crime of beings, and teaches his disciples a dharma of this kind: 'Should a person kill every being there is, yet feel no shame or remorse in his mind, he shall never, in the end, fall into any evil destiny at all — just as empty space accepts no dust or water; but should he feel shame and remorse, he falls straight into hell, just as a great flood moistens and soaks the earth. Every being is entirely the creation of Īśvara, the Lord of自在; when Īśvara is pleased, beings enjoy peace and happiness, and when Īśvara is angered, beings suffer anguish and pain. Whatever crime or merit any being has is entirely the doing of Īśvara — how, then, could it be said that any human being possesses crime or merit at all? It is like a craftsman who builds a mechanical wooden man, which walks, stands, sits, and lies down, lacking only the power of speech — every being is exactly the same; Īśvara is likened to the craftsman, and the wooden man is likened to the very body of any being — in such a creation as this, who, then, could bear any crime at all?' This great teacher now dwells nearby, within the city of Rājagṛha — I beg you to go there quickly; should you succeed in seeing him, every crime shall be extinguished." The king answered: "Should there truly be such a person, able to extinguish my crime, I shall then take refuge in him."

Chinese Source

復有一臣名無所畏,往至王所,說如是言:「大王!世有愚人,一日之中百喜百愁、百眠百寤、百驚百哭,有智之人斯無是事。大王!何故憂愁如是,如失侶客,如墮深泥無救拔者,如人渴乏不得漿水,猶如迷人無有導者,如困病人無醫救療,如海船破無救接者?大王!今者為身痛耶?為心痛乎?」王即答言:「我今身心,豈得不痛?我近惡友,不觀口過,先王無辜橫興逆害,我今定知當入地獄,復無良醫而見救濟。」臣即白言:「唯願大王!莫生愁毒。夫剎利者,名為王種,若為國土、若為沙門及婆羅門、為安人民,雖復殺害無有罪也。先王雖復恭敬沙門,不能承事諸婆羅門,心無平等,心無平等故則非剎利。大王!今者為欲供養諸婆羅門,殺害先王,當有何罪?大王!實無殺害。夫殺害者,殺害壽命。命名風氣,風氣之性,不可殺害,云何害命而當有罪?唯願大王!莫復愁苦。何以故?「若常愁苦,愁遂增長。如人憙眠,眠則滋多。貪婬嗜酒,亦復如是。「如王所言,世無良醫而療治者,今有大師,名尼乾陀若提子,一切知見,憐愍眾生,善知眾生諸根利鈍,達解一切隨宜方便,世間八法所不能污,寂靜修習清淨梵行,為諸弟子說如是言:『無施、無善、無父無母、無今世後世、無阿羅漢、無修、無道,一切眾生經八萬劫,於生死輪自然得脫,有罪無罪悉亦如是;如四大河,所謂辛頭、恒河、博叉、私陀,悉入大海,無有差別。一切眾生亦復如是,得解脫時,悉無差別。』是師今在王舍城住,唯願大王速往其所,若得見者眾罪消除。」王即答言:「審有是師能除我罪,我當歸依。」

Ru-Yi Translation

There was another minister, named Fearless, who went to the king, and spoke thus: "Great king, there are foolish people in this world who, within a single day, feel a hundred joys and a hundred sorrows, sleep a hundred times and wake a hundred times, feel a hundred frights and weep a hundred times — but a person of wisdom has nothing of this kind at all. Great king, why is your grief so great — like a traveler who has lost his companions, like one who has fallen into deep mire with no one to pull him out, like a man parched with thirst who can find no drink, like one who has lost his way with no guide to lead him, like a person gravely ill with no physician to save him, or like one whose ship has broken apart at sea with no one to rescue him? Great king, is it your body that pains you today, or your mind?" The king answered: "How could my body and mind not pain me? I drew near to evil companions and did not examine their faults of speech, and, my former father, the king, entirely innocent, I wrongfully turned against and had killed; I now know for certain that I shall fall into hell, and I have, again, no good physician to come to my rescue." The minister said: "I beg the great king not to give rise to such bitter sorrow. As for the kṣatriya — this is the very name of the royal lineage — whether acting for the sake of the kingdom, or for the sake of śramaṇas and brahmins, or for the sake of the people's own peace, though he should kill, he carries no crime in it at all. Though your former father, the king, showed reverence to the śramaṇas, he was unable to serve the brahmins as he ought, his mind lacking any impartiality — and, his mind lacking impartiality, he was therefore no true kṣatriya at all. Great king, in killing your former father precisely so that you might now make offerings to the brahmins, what crime at all could there be? Great king, there is, in reality, no killing at all. As for 'killing' — this means killing one's own lifespan. Life is named the very breath of wind, and the nature of this breath of wind cannot be killed or harmed at all — how, then, could killing this life carry any crime? I beg the great king not to give way to sorrow any longer. Why is this? 'Should one forever give way to sorrow, / that sorrow only increases and grows. / It is like a person who delights in sleep — / the more he sleeps, the more sleep he craves. / Craving lust and delighting in wine / are both exactly the same.' As for what the great king has said, that the world has no good physician to provide healing — there is now a great teacher named Nirgrantha Jñātiputra, who possesses all knowledge and vision, has compassion for beings, knows well the sharpness or dullness of every being's own faculties, and thoroughly understands every skillful means suited to each — untainted by any of the eight worldly dharmas, cultivating a tranquil and pure holy conduct — and he teaches his disciples in this way: 'There is no giving, no goodness, no father, no mother, no present world and no world to come, no arhat, no cultivation, and no path; every being, after passing through eighty thousand kalpas, is naturally freed from the wheel of birth and death, and this holds true whether one has committed a crime or not; it is like the four great rivers — the Sindhu, the Gaṅgā, the Vakṣu, and the Sītā — every one of which flows into the great ocean without any distinction remaining between them. Every being is exactly the same: at the moment of liberation, there is no distinction whatsoever remaining between them.' This teacher now dwells within the city of Rājagṛha — I beg the great king to hasten to where he is; should you succeed in seeing him, every crime shall be dispelled." The king answered: "Should there truly be such a teacher, able to remove my crime, I shall then take refuge in him."

Reading note — after Huiyuan

The remaining three teachers, per Huiyuan, complete the same six-fold catalogue: Knower-of-Meaning's teacher, Ajita Keśakambalī, holds the "view of naturalism" (自然見) — good and evil are illusory distinctions a mind of true equanimity sees through entirely, which is why his teaching is framed as radical non-discrimination (gold and dirt, friend and foe, cutting flesh and anointing it with sandalwood, all literally indistinguishable) rather than as a denial of consequence through some other mechanism; Auspicious-Virtue's teacher, Kakuda Kātyāyana, holds the "view that Īśvara is the cause" (自在天因見) — every being's fate is authored entirely by a controlling deity, reducing beings to a craftsman's puppets with no moral agency of their own to be praised or blamed; and Fearless's teacher, Nirgrantha Jñātiputra, holds "the view that no cultivation is required" (不須修道外道) — liberation arrives automatically after a fixed span of time (eighty thousand kalpas) regardless of what anyone does or fails to do, which is arguably the most complete denial of the whole structure of practice this sūtra has spent eighteen fascicles building, since it makes even correct effort pointless rather than merely making incorrect effort harmless.

Huiyuan flags one line for special caution: "north of the Gaṅgā, giving to beings brings no merit; south of the Gaṅgā, killing beings brings no crime," attributed to Ajita's teaching — he explicitly warns the reader not to strain for a hidden meaning here ("蓋且言耳,不勞異釋"), treating it as simply an arbitrary illustration of "no consequence attaches to any act at all, regardless of geography," rather than a claim requiring doctrinal unpacking. He also notes that the fifth minister's argument contains an internal contradiction worth registering rather than resolving: it first argues that killing carries no crime because a kṣatriya king may act freely for the good of the realm, and then argues, on a wholly different basis, that killing carries no crime because "life" is merely a name for the motion of wind and cannot be killed at all — two arguments from two different metaphysical premises, stacked together as though they were one, which is itself part of what these six ministers' teachings share: each borrows freely from whatever argument is most convenient in the moment, with no concern for whether it coheres with the argument offered just before it.

Who Sleeps Well?

Chinese Source

爾時大醫,名曰耆婆,往至王所白言:「大王!得安眠不?」王即以偈答言:

Ru-Yi Translation

At that time, the great physician named Jīvaka went to where the king was, and said: "Great king, are you able to sleep in peace?" The king answered with this verse:

Chinese Source

「若有能永斷,一切諸煩惱,不貪染三界,乃得安隱眠。

若得大涅槃,演說甚深義,名真婆羅門,乃得安隱眠。

身無諸惡業,口離於四過,心無有疑網,乃得安隱眠。

身心無熱惱,安住寂靜處,獲致無上樂,乃得安隱眠。

心無有取著,遠離諸怨讎,常和無諍訟,乃得安隱眠。

若不造惡業,心常懷慚愧,信惡有果報,乃得安隱眠。

敬養於父母,不害一生命,不盜他財物,乃得安隱眠。

調伏於諸根,親近善知識,破壞四魔眾,乃得安隱眠。

不見吉不吉,及以苦樂等,為諸眾生故,輪轉於生死,若能如是者,乃得安隱眠。

誰得安隱眠?所謂諸佛是。深觀空三昧,身心安不動。

誰得安隱眠?所謂慈悲者,常修不放逸,視眾如一子。

眾生無明冥,不見煩惱果,常造諸惡業,不得安隱眠。

若為於自身,及以他人身,造作十惡業,不得安隱眠。

若言為樂故,害父無過咎,隨是惡知識,不得安隱眠。

若食過節度,冷飲而過差,如是則病苦,不得安隱眠。

若於王有過,邪念他婦女,及行壙路者,不得安隱眠。

持戒果未熟,太子未紹位,盜者未獲財,不得安隱眠。

Ru-Yi Translation

"Should one be able forever to sever every single affliction, / and crave and cling to none of the three realms, / then one attains a peaceful sleep.

Should one attain this great nirvāṇa, / and expound its very deepest meaning, / one is named a true brahmin, / and thereby attains a peaceful sleep.

The body free of every evil deed, / speech free of the four verbal faults, / the mind free of the net of doubt — / thereby one attains a peaceful sleep.

Body and mind free of feverish affliction, / abiding in a place of quiet stillness, / attaining the unsurpassed bliss — / thereby one attains a peaceful sleep.

The mind free of grasping and attachment, / keeping far from every foe and enemy, / forever at peace, free of contention — / thereby one attains a peaceful sleep.

Should one commit no evil deed, / the mind forever holding shame and remorse, / trusting that evil bears its fruit — / thereby one attains a peaceful sleep.

Reverently caring for one's own father and mother, / harming not a single living being, / stealing no wealth belonging to another — / thereby one attains a peaceful sleep.

Taming every one of the faculties, / drawing near to a good and wise friend, / breaking apart the host of the four demons — / thereby one attains a peaceful sleep.

Seeing neither the auspicious nor the inauspicious, / nor suffering and pleasure as any different, / turning through birth-and-death for the sake of every being — / should one be able to do this, / then one attains a peaceful sleep.

Who attains a peaceful sleep? It is every buddha, / who deeply contemplates emptiness in meditative absorption, / body and mind at peace, unmoving.

Who attains a peaceful sleep? It is one of loving-kindness and compassion, / who forever cultivates heedfulness, / and views every being as an only child.

Beings, in the darkness of ignorance, / do not see the fruit of their own afflictions, / and forever commit every evil deed — / such beings do not attain a peaceful sleep.

Should one, whether for one's own body / or for the body of another, / commit the ten evil deeds — / one does not attain a peaceful sleep.

Should one say that, for the sake of pleasure, / killing one's own father carries no fault at all, / and follow such an evil counselor as this — / one does not attain a peaceful sleep.

Should one eat beyond all moderation, / or drink what is cold to excess, / this then becomes an illness — / and one does not attain a peaceful sleep.

Should one transgress against the king, / harbor wrongful thoughts toward another's wife, / or travel along a desolate road — / one does not attain a peaceful sleep.

While the fruit of one's precepts is not yet ripe, / while a crown prince has not yet succeeded to the throne, / while a thief has not yet seized his plunder — / none of these attain a peaceful sleep.

Reading note — after Huiyuan

Huiyuan parses this poem into an eleven-and-a-half-verse account of who sleeps well, followed by six verses on who does not, and reads the first half as itself structured in two tiers: four verses on how a buddha sleeps (severing affliction, attaining nirvāṇa and expounding it, keeping the three actions pure, and being free of both feverish affliction and its resulting torment), followed by four-and-a-half verses on how a bodhisattva sleeps (freedom from the three karmic actions across three verses, plus one further verse combining freedom from remaining affliction and suffering, then a half-verse of altruistic action turning through saṃsāra for others' sake) — with the closing two verses ("who attains a peaceful sleep? it is every buddha... it is one of loving-kindness and compassion") functioning as the poem's own explicit summary, naming outright the two figures the preceding verses had only described.

On the second half, he splits the six verses evenly: the first three name states of active evil that prevent sleep (delusion producing wrongdoing, greed producing wrongdoing, evil companionship producing wrongdoing), and the last three name states of unresolved suffering that do the same, working through a schema of seven kinds of suffering the sūtra has used before — illness, the fear of death implicit in "transgression against the king," and five distinct varieties of the suffering of not getting what one wants (unripe precepts, an unsucceeded throne, unclaimed plunder, and the like), each an image of a desire still held in suspension rather than of pain already inflicted. Huiyuan's broader point in laying out this structure is that the king's own recitation — offered, ironically, in direct answer to Jīvaka's simple question about sleep — is itself proof that the king already knows, in exhaustive and organized detail, exactly what peace would require and exactly why he does not have it; the six ministers gave him permission to stop asking the question, and this poem shows that permission never actually worked.

Two White Dharmas

Chinese Source

「耆婆!我今病重,於正法王,興惡逆害,一切良醫妙藥、呪術、善巧、瞻病所不能治。何以故?我父法王如法治國,實無辜咎,橫加逆害。如魚處陸,當有何樂?如鹿在弶,初無歡心;如人自知命不終日;如王失國逃迸他土;如人聞病不可療治;如破戒者聞說罪過。我昔曾聞智者說言:『身口意業若不清淨,當知是人必墮地獄。』我亦如是,云何當得安隱眠耶?今我又無無上大醫,演說法藥,除我病苦。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"Jīvaka, my own illness is now grave: I turned against the king of the true Dharma and had him wrongfully killed, and no fine physician, no wondrous medicine, no incantation, no skillful means, and no attendant at my sickbed is able to cure it. Why is this? My father, the king of the Dharma, ruled his kingdom in accordance with the Dharma, and was, in truth, entirely without fault — and I wrongfully turned against him and had him killed. It is like a fish stranded on dry land — what joy could it possibly find? It is like a deer caught in a snare, with not the slightest joy left in it; like a man who knows for himself that his own life will not last out the day; like a king who has lost his kingdom and fled into exile in another land; like a man who hears that his own illness cannot be cured; or like a precept-breaker who hears his own transgression spoken aloud. I once heard a wise man say: 'Should the actions of body, speech, and mind fail to be pure, know that such a person must certainly fall into hell.' I am exactly the same — how could I possibly attain a peaceful sleep? And I now have no supreme physician at all, to expound the medicine of the Dharma and remove the suffering of my illness."

Chinese Source

耆婆答言:「善哉,善哉!王雖作罪,心生重悔,而懷慚愧。大王!諸佛世尊常說是言:『有二白法,能救眾生:一慚、二愧。慚者自不作罪,愧者不教他作;慚者內自羞恥,愧者發露向人;慚者羞人,愧者羞天;是名慚愧。無慚愧者不名為人,名為畜生。有慚愧故,則能恭敬父母師長;有慚愧故,說有父母兄弟姊妹。』善哉大王!具有慚愧。大王且聽,臣聞佛說:『智者有二:一者不造諸惡,二者作已懺悔;愚者亦二,一者作罪,二者覆藏。雖先作惡後能發露,悔已慚愧更不敢作,猶如濁水置之明珠,以珠威力水即為清;如烟雲除,月則清明。作惡能悔,亦復如是。』王若懺悔懷慚愧者,罪即除滅,清淨如本。大王!富有二種:一者象馬、種種畜生,二者金銀、種種珍寶。象馬雖多,不敵一珠。大王!眾生亦爾,一者惡富,二者善富。多作諸惡,不如一善。臣聞佛說,修一善心,破百種惡。大王!如少金剛能壞須彌,亦如少火能燒一切,如少毒藥能害眾生,少善亦爾能破大惡。雖名少善,其實是大。何以故?破大惡故。大王!如佛所說覆藏者漏,不覆藏者則無有漏,發露悔過是故不漏。若作眾罪不覆不藏,以不覆故罪則微薄,若懷慚愧罪則消滅。大王!如水渧雖微,漸盈大器,善心亦爾,一一善心能破大惡。若覆罪者罪則增長,發露慚愧罪則消滅,是故諸佛說有智者不覆藏罪。善哉大王!能信因果、信業、信報,唯願大王莫懷愁怖。若有眾生造作諸罪,覆藏不悔心無慚愧,不見因果及以業報,不能諮啟有智之人不近善友,如是之人一切良醫乃至瞻病所不能治。如迦摩羅病世醫拱手,覆罪之人亦復如是。云何罪人?謂一闡提。一闡提者,不信因果,無有慚愧,不信業報,不見現在及未來世,不親善友,不隨諸佛所說教戒,如是之人名一闡提,諸佛世尊所不能治。何以故?如世死屍,醫不能治。一闡提者亦復如是,諸佛世尊所不能治。大王今者非一闡提,云何而言不可救療?」

Ru-Yi Translation

Jīvaka answered: "Excellent, excellent! Though the king has committed a crime, his mind has given rise to grave remorse, and he now holds both shame and remorse within him. Great king, every buddha, every world-honored one, forever speaks these words: 'There are two white dharmas that are able to save beings: the first is shame (慚), and the second is remorse (愧). Shame means not committing a crime oneself; remorse means not teaching another to commit one. Shame means feeling disgrace inwardly, within oneself; remorse means confessing it openly to others. Shame means feeling disgraced before other people; remorse means feeling disgraced before the gods. This is what is meant by shame and remorse. One without shame or remorse cannot be named a human being at all — he is named an animal. It is because one has shame and remorse that he is able to revere his own parents and teachers; and it is because one has shame and remorse that there is said to be such a thing as father, mother, brothers, and sisters at all.' Excellent, great king! You are fully endowed with both shame and remorse. Great king, hear this further: your servant has heard the Buddha say: 'The wise are of two kinds — one who commits no evil at all, and one who, having committed it, is able to confess and repent it; the foolish, too, are of two kinds — one who commits a crime, and one who conceals it. Though one has first committed an evil deed, if he is later able to confess it openly, and, having repented, feels shame and remorse and dares not commit it again, it is just like a pearl of great brightness placed within muddied water — through the pearl's own power, the water at once becomes clear; it is like clouds and mist dispersing, so that the moon shines forth pure and bright. Committing evil and yet being able to repent it is exactly the same.' Should the king confess and repent, holding both shame and remorse, his crime shall at once be extinguished, and he shall be as pure as he was at the very beginning. Great king, wealth is of two kinds: the first is elephants, horses, and every kind of livestock; the second is gold, silver, and every kind of precious treasure. However many elephants and horses one may have, they cannot match a single pearl. Great king, beings are exactly the same: there is a wealth of evil, and there is a wealth of good. Committing a great many evil deeds does not equal a single good one. Your servant has heard the Buddha say that cultivating a single wholesome thought is able to break a hundred kinds of evil. Great king, it is like how a small amount of vajra is able to destroy Mount Sumeru, or how a small fire is able to burn everything, or how a small amount of poison is able to harm every being — a small amount of good is exactly the same, able to break through even great evil. Though it is called a small good, in truth it is great. Why is this? Because it breaks through great evil. Great king, it is as the Buddha has taught: concealment is an outflow, and non-concealment has no outflow at all; confessing openly and repenting one's transgression is therefore free of outflow. Should one commit every kind of crime and yet neither conceal nor hide it, then, because it is not concealed, the crime becomes slight and thin; and should one hold shame and remorse, the crime is thereby extinguished entirely. Great king, it is like a drop of water — though minute, it gradually fills a great vessel; a wholesome thought is exactly the same — each and every wholesome thought is able to break through even great evil. Should one conceal his crime, the crime only grows and increases; should one confess it openly with shame and remorse, the crime is thereby extinguished — it is for this very reason that every buddha teaches that the wise do not conceal their crimes. Excellent, great king, that you are able to have faith in cause and effect, faith in karma, and faith in its fruit — I beg the great king not to harbor sorrow and terror any longer. Should any being commit every kind of crime, conceal it without repenting, hold no shame or remorse in his mind, fail to see cause and effect and the fruit of karma, be unable to consult a person of wisdom, and fail to draw near to a good and wise friend — such a person cannot be cured by any fine physician at all, nor even by any attendant at his sickbed. It is like the disease of leprosy, before which even the world's own physicians can only fold their hands in helplessness — one who conceals his own crime is exactly the same. What is meant by such a person of crime? This means the icchantika. The icchantika does not believe in cause and effect, is without shame or remorse, does not believe in karma and its fruit, does not perceive the present world or the world to come, does not draw near to a good and wise friend, and does not follow the teachings and precepts taught by every buddha — a person of this kind is named an icchantika, and cannot be cured by any buddha, any world-honored one, at all. Why is this? It is like a corpse already dead in this world, which no physician can cure. The icchantika is exactly the same — he cannot be cured by any buddha, any world-honored one, at all. The great king, at this moment, is no icchantika — how, then, could it be said that he cannot be saved and cured?"

Reading note — after Huiyuan

Huiyuan reads the king's own six-part confession here — the fish on dry land, the snared deer, the man who knows his own death is near, the exiled king, the man told his illness is incurable, the precept-breaker hearing his fault named aloud — as the final piece of evidence, before Jīvaka speaks at all, that the king's condition is not actually severe in the way he believes: a person genuinely beyond reach does not produce an inventory of similes this precise about his own suffering. This is exactly the diagnostic distinction Jīvaka goes on to make explicit: shame and remorse are not signs that the king's crime is worse than he thinks, but proof that his case is treatable at all, "翻上初段" (the reverse of what came before) — where the six ministers had each tried to convince him that no crime existed, Jīvaka reverses course entirely, letting the crime stand exactly as grave as the king believes it to be, and locating the cure not in denying the wound but in how one responds to it.

On the icchantika definition itself, Huiyuan is careful to specify what is doing the actual work: it is not the greatness of a crime that makes someone incurable — the king has committed patricide, one of the five gravest offenses — but the five-part refusal that constitutes the icchantika as such (no belief in cause and effect, no shame, no belief in karmic fruit, no regard for either this world or the next, no willingness to approach a good friend or follow any buddha's teaching). Because the king retains shame, remorse, and the capacity to be moved by an argument at all, he fails this definition on every count, which is precisely why Huiyuan reads Jīvaka's closing line — "the great king, at this moment, is no icchantika" — as the passage's actual thesis, delivered only after twenty-two verses and two long chains of simile have made the reader feel, alongside the king, that he might be one.

Ten Names, and All Whom the Buddha Has Healed

Chinese Source

「如王所言無能治者,大王當知,迦毘羅城淨飯王子,姓瞿曇氏,字悉達多,無師覺悟,自然而得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,三十二相、八十種好莊嚴其身,具足十力、四無所畏、一切知見、大慈大悲,憐愍一切如羅睺羅,隨善眾生如犢逐母,知時而說,非時不語,實語、淨語、妙語、義語、法語、一語,能令眾生永離煩惱。善知眾生諸根心性,隨宜方便無不通達。其智高大如須彌山,深邃廣遠猶如大海。是佛世尊有金剛智,能破眾生一切惡罪,若言不能,無有是處。今者去此十二由旬,在拘尸那城娑羅雙樹間,而為無量阿僧祇等諸菩薩僧,演種種法:若有、若無,若有為、若無為,若有漏、若無漏,若煩惱果、若善法果,若色法、若非色法、若非色非非色法,若我、若非我、若非我非非我,若常、若非常、若非常非非常,若樂、若非樂、若非樂非非樂,若相、若非相、若非相非非相,若斷、若非斷、若非斷非非斷,若世、若出世、若非世非出世,若乘、若非乘、若非乘非非乘,若自作自受、若自作他受、若無作無受。大王!若當於佛所,聞無作無受,所有重罪即當消滅。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"As for what the great king has said, that there is no one able to cure him — great king, you should know that the son of King Śuddhodana of the city of Kapilavastu, of the Gautama clan, named Siddhārtha, awakened without any teacher, attaining unsurpassed, complete awakening entirely of his own accord, his body adorned with the thirty-two marks and eighty subsidiary signs, fully endowed with the ten powers, the four kinds of fearlessness, all knowledge and vision, and great loving-kindness and great compassion; he has compassion for every being just as for his own son Rāhula, and follows and benefits beings just as a calf follows its mother; he speaks when the time is right, and stays silent when it is not; his speech is true, pure, wondrous, meaningful, in accord with the Dharma, and free of duplicity, and it is able to cause beings forever to leave affliction behind. He knows well the faculties, mind, and nature of every being, and is thoroughly versed in every skillful means suited to each. His wisdom towers as high as Mount Sumeru, and is as deep and vast as the great ocean itself. This Buddha, this World-Honored One, possesses a vajra-like wisdom, able to break through every evil crime of any being — to say that he is unable could not possibly be so. He is now, twelve leagues from here, among the twin sāla trees at the city of Kuśinagara, expounding every kind of dharma for the sake of an immeasurable, incalculable assembly of bodhisattva monks: whether existence or non-existence, whether the conditioned or the unconditioned, whether what is subject to outflow or what is free of it, whether the fruit of affliction or the fruit of a wholesome dharma, whether form or non-form or neither form nor non-form, whether self or non-self or neither self nor non-self, whether permanent or impermanent or neither permanent nor impermanent, whether pleasurable or not pleasurable or neither, whether marked or unmarked or neither, whether severance or non-severance or neither, whether worldly or transcending the world or neither, whether a vehicle or not a vehicle or neither, whether one acts and reaps the fruit oneself, or acts oneself and another reaps the fruit, or whether there is neither action nor the reaping of any fruit at all. Great king, should you go to where the Buddha is, and hear of this very absence of action and the reaping of its fruit, every one of your grave crimes shall at once be dissolved."

Chinese Source

「王今且聽,釋提桓因命將欲終,有五相現:一者衣裳垢膩,二者頭上花萎,三者身體臭穢,四者腋下汗出,五者不樂本座。時天帝釋或於靜處,若見沙門、若婆羅門,即至其所,生於佛想。爾時沙門及婆羅門見帝釋來,深自慶幸,即說是語:『天主!我今歸依於汝。』釋聞是已,乃知非佛。復自念言:『彼若非佛,不能治我五退沒相。』是時御臣名般遮尸,語帝釋言:『憍尸迦!乾闥婆王名敦浮樓,其王有女,字須跋陀,王若能以此女見與,臣當示王除衰相處。』釋即答言:『善男子!毘摩質多阿修羅王有女舍脂,是吾所敬,卿若必能示吾消滅惡相處者,猶當相與,況須跋陀?』『憍尸迦!有佛世尊字釋迦牟尼,今者在於王舍大城,若能往彼諮稟未聞,衰沒之相必得除滅。』『善男子!若佛世尊審能滅者,便可迴駕至其住處。』御臣奉命即迴車乘,到王舍城耆闍崛山,至於佛所頭面禮足,却坐一面,白佛言:『世尊!天人之中誰為繫縛?』『憍尸迦!慳、貪、嫉妬。』又言:『慳貪嫉妬,因何而生?』答言:『因無明生。』又言:『無明復因何生?』答言:『因放逸生。』又言:『放逸復因何生?』答言:『因顛倒生。』又言:『顛倒復因何生?』答言:『因疑心生。』『世尊!顛倒之法因疑生者,實如聖教。何以故?我有疑心,以疑心故,則生顛倒,於非世尊,生世尊想。我今見佛,疑網即除,疑網除故顛倒亦盡,顛倒盡故,無有慳心乃至妬心。』佛言:『汝言無有慳妬心者,汝今已得阿那含耶,阿那含者無有貪心。若無貪心,云何為命來至我所?而阿那含實不求命。』『世尊!有顛倒者則有求命,無顛倒者則不求命。然我今者實不求命,所欲求者,唯佛法身及佛智慧。』『憍尸迦!求佛法身及佛智慧,將來之世必當得之。』爾時帝釋聞佛說已,五衰沒相即時消滅,便起作禮,遶佛三匝,恭敬合掌而白佛言:『世尊!我今即死即生、失命得命,又聞佛記當得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,是為更生為更得命。世尊!一切人天,云何增益?復以何緣,而致損減?』『憍尸迦!鬪諍因緣,人天損減;善修和敬,則得增益。』『世尊!若以鬪諍而損減者,我從今日更不復與阿修羅戰。』佛言:『善哉,善哉!憍尸迦!諸佛世尊說忍辱法,是阿耨多羅三藐三菩提因。』」

Ru-Yi Translation

"Hear this further, great king: when Śakra, lord of the gods, was about to die, five signs appeared to him: first, his own robes became soiled and stained; second, the flowers upon his head withered; third, his own body grew foul and malodorous; fourth, sweat poured out from beneath his arms; and fifth, he no longer took pleasure in his own throne. At that time, Śakra, wherever he happened to see a śramaṇa or a brahmin in some quiet place, would go straight to him and take him for the Buddha himself. The śramaṇas and brahmins, seeing Śakra approach them, rejoiced deeply within themselves, and said: 'Lord of the gods, I now take refuge in you.' Śakra, hearing this, knew at once that this was not the Buddha, and thought to himself: 'If he is not the Buddha, he cannot cure my own five signs of decline.' At that time, his charioteer, named Pañcaśikha, said to Śakra: 'Kauśika, the gandharva king named Timbaru has a daughter named Suvarṇā — should the king be able to give me this daughter, I shall show the king a place where his signs of decline may be removed.' Śakra answered: 'Good man, the asura king Vemacitrin has a daughter named Śacī, whom I myself hold dear — should you truly be able to show me a place where my evil signs may be extinguished, I would give you even her, how much more this Suvarṇā?' 'Kauśika, there is a buddha, a world-honored one, named Śākyamuni, who now dwells in the great city of Rājagṛha — should you be able to go there and inquire of what you have not yet heard, your signs of decline shall certainly be removed.' 'Good man, should the Buddha, the World-Honored One, truly be able to remove them, then let us turn our chariot at once toward where he dwells.' The charioteer, receiving this command, at once turned the chariot around, and arrived at Mount Gṛdhrakūṭa near the city of Rājagṛha; going to where the Buddha was, he bowed his head to the Buddha's feet, withdrew to sit to one side, and said to the Buddha: 'World-Honored One, among gods and men, what is it that binds them?' 'Kauśika, it is stinginess, greed, and envy.' He asked further: 'From what cause do stinginess, greed, and envy arise?' The Buddha answered: 'They arise from the cause of ignorance.' He asked further: 'And from what cause does ignorance itself arise?' The Buddha answered: 'It arises from the cause of heedlessness.' He asked further: 'And from what cause does heedlessness itself arise?' The Buddha answered: 'It arises from the cause of inverted thinking.' He asked further: 'And from what cause does inverted thinking itself arise?' The Buddha answered: 'It arises from the cause of a mind of doubt.' 'World-Honored One, that inverted thinking arises from the cause of doubt is, in truth, just as the sacred teaching says. Why is this? I myself harbored a mind of doubt, and, because of this doubt, inverted thinking arose in me, so that I took one who was not the World-Honored One for the World-Honored One himself. Now that I have seen the Buddha, the net of doubt is at once removed, and, the net of doubt being removed, inverted thinking, too, is exhausted, and, inverted thinking being exhausted, there is no longer any mind of stinginess, nor even of envy, left in me.' The Buddha said: 'You say you are without any mind of stinginess or envy — have you, then, already attained the fruit of non-returning? A non-returner is without any mind of greed at all. If you have no mind of greed, why, then, have you come here seeking your own life? A non-returner, in truth, seeks nothing for his own life at all.' 'World-Honored One, one with inverted thinking seeks his own life, while one free of inverted thinking does not seek it. And yet I, in truth, seek nothing at all for my own life — what I seek is only the Buddha's own Dharma-body and the Buddha's own wisdom.' 'Kauśika, in seeking the Buddha's own Dharma-body and the Buddha's own wisdom, you shall, in a future age, most certainly attain them.' Hearing the Buddha say this, Śakra's own five signs of decline were at once dissolved entirely; he rose, made obeisance, circled the Buddha three times, and, with palms joined in reverence, said to the Buddha: 'World-Honored One, I have, in this very moment, both died and been reborn, both lost my life and regained it — and, further, having heard the Buddha's own prediction that I shall attain unsurpassed, complete awakening, this, too, is being born again, is gaining life again. World-Honored One, by what means do gods and men increase and flourish? And by what cause do they come to decline and diminish?' 'Kauśika, through the causes and conditions of conflict and strife, gods and men decline and diminish; through cultivating harmony and mutual respect well, they increase and flourish.' 'World-Honored One, if it is through conflict and strife that one declines and diminishes, then, from this day forward, I shall never again do battle with the asuras.' The Buddha said: 'Excellent, excellent, Kauśika! Every buddha, every world-honored one, teaches the dharma of patient forbearance as the very cause of unsurpassed, complete awakening.'"

Chinese Source

「爾時釋提桓因,即前禮佛,於是還去。大王!如來以能除諸惡相,是故稱佛不可思議。王若往者,所有重罪必當得除。大王且聽,有婆羅門子,字曰不害,以殺無量諸眾生故名鴦崛魔。復欲害母,惡心起時,身亦隨動,身心動者即五逆因,五逆因故必墮地獄。後見佛時身心俱動,復欲生害,身心動者即五逆因,五逆因故當入地獄。是人得遇如來大師,即時得滅地獄因緣,發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心,是故稱佛為無上醫,非六師也。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"At that time, Śakra, lord of the gods, bowed before the Buddha and then withdrew. Great king, it is because the Tathāgata is able to remove every evil sign in this way that the Buddha is said to be inconceivable. Should the king go to him, every grave crime of yours must certainly be removed as well. Hear this further, great king: there was a brahmin's son named Ahiṃsaka, who, through killing immeasurable beings, came to be named Aṅgulimāla. He wished, further, to kill his own mother, and, as this evil thought arose in him, his body, too, trembled in response — and a trembling of body and mind such as this is itself the cause of one of the five gravest offenses, and, being the cause of one of the five gravest offenses, it must certainly lead to hell. Later, when he saw the Buddha, his body and mind trembled together once more, and he wished, again, to commit this killing — and this trembling of body and mind was, again, the cause of one of the five gravest offenses, and, being such a cause, would lead to hell. Yet this very person came to encounter the great teacher, the Tathāgata, and, in that very moment, was able to extinguish the cause leading to hell, and gave rise to the mind of unsurpassed, complete awakening — it is for this very reason that the Buddha is called the unsurpassed physician, unlike the six teachers."

Chinese Source

「大王!復有須毘羅王子,其父瞋之,截其手足,推之深井。其母矜愍,使人牽出,將至佛所。尋見佛時,手足還具,即發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心。大王!以見佛故,得現果報,是故稱佛為無上醫,非六師也。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"Great king, there was, further, a prince named Suvīra, whose own father, enraged at him, cut off his hands and feet and cast him into a deep well. His mother, taking pity on him, sent people to pull him out, and brought him to where the Buddha was. The moment he saw the Buddha, his hands and feet were fully restored, and he at once gave rise to the mind of unsurpassed, complete awakening. Great king, it was through seeing the Buddha that he obtained this very fruit in this present life — it is for this very reason that the Buddha is called the unsurpassed physician, unlike the six teachers."

Chinese Source

「大王!如恒河邊有諸餓鬼,其數五百,於無量歲,初不見水,雖至河上,純見流火,飢渴所逼發聲號哭。爾時如來,在其河側,欝曇鉢林,坐一樹下。時諸餓鬼來至佛所,白佛言:『世尊!我等飢渴,命將不遠。』佛言:『恒河流水,汝何不飲?』鬼即答言:『如來見水,我則見火。』佛言:『恒河清流,實無火也,以惡業故心自顛倒,謂為是火。我當為汝除滅顛倒,令汝見水。』爾時世尊,廣為諸鬼說慳貪過。諸鬼即言:『我今渴乏,雖聞法言,都不入心。』佛言:『汝若渴乏,先可入河,恣意飲之。』是諸鬼等,以佛力故,即得飲水。既飲水已,如來復為種種說法,既聞法已,悉發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心,捨餓鬼形,得於天身。大王!是故稱佛為無上醫,非六師也。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"Great king, there were, beside the Gaṅgā, hungry ghosts numbering, in all, five hundred, who, for immeasurable years, had never once seen water at all — even when they came to the riverbank, they saw only flowing fire, and, driven by hunger and thirst, cried out in anguish. At that time, the Tathāgata was seated beneath a tree in an udumbara grove beside that very river. The hungry ghosts came to where the Buddha was, and said to him: 'World-Honored One, we are starving and parched — our lives will not last much longer.' The Buddha said: 'The Gaṅgā flows with water — why do you not drink of it?' The ghosts answered: 'Where the Tathāgata sees water, we see only fire.' The Buddha said: 'The Gaṅgā's flow is, in truth, entirely pure, and has no fire in it at all — it is on account of your own evil karma that your minds are inverted, and you take it to be fire. I shall now remove this inversion for you, and cause you to see water instead.' The World-Honored One then broadly expounded, for the sake of these ghosts, the fault of stinginess and greed. The ghosts said: 'We are now so parched with thirst that, though we hear these words of the Dharma, none of it enters our minds at all.' The Buddha said: 'If you are so parched, you may first enter the river and drink your fill as you wish.' These ghosts, through the Buddha's own power, were at once able to drink the water. Having drunk the water, the Tathāgata then expounded every kind of teaching for them further, and, having heard this teaching, they all together gave rise to the mind of unsurpassed, complete awakening, cast off their forms as hungry ghosts, and attained the bodies of gods. Great king, it is for this very reason that the Buddha is called the unsurpassed physician, unlike the six teachers."

Chinese Source

「大王!舍婆提國群賊五百,波斯匿王,挑出其目,無有前導,不能得往至於佛所。佛憐愍故,即至賊所,慰喻之言:『善男子!善護身口,更勿造惡。』諸賊即時聞如來音,微妙清徹,尋還得眼。即於佛前合掌禮佛,而白佛言:『世尊!我今知佛慈心普覆一切眾生,非獨人天。』爾時如來即為說法。既聞法已,悉發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心。是故如來真是世間無上良醫,非六師也。「大王!舍婆提國有旃陀羅,名曰氣噓,殺無量人,見佛弟子大目犍連,即時得破地獄因緣,而得上生三十三天。以有如是聖弟子故,稱佛如來為無上醫,非六師也。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"Great king, there was, in the kingdom of Śrāvastī, a band of five hundred bandits whose eyes King Prasenajit had gouged out; having no one to guide them, they were unable to make their own way to where the Buddha was. The Buddha, out of compassion for them, went himself to where these bandits were, and comforted them, saying: 'Good men, guard well your body and speech, and commit no further evil.' The bandits, hearing the Tathāgata's own voice, subtle and wondrous, pure and clear, at once had their sight restored. They joined their palms and bowed before the Buddha, and said to him: 'World-Honored One, we now know that the Buddha's own compassionate mind covers every being universally, not only gods and men.' The Tathāgata then expounded the Dharma for them. Having heard this teaching, they all together gave rise to the mind of unsurpassed, complete awakening. It is for this very reason that the Tathāgata is truly the world's own unsurpassed, good physician, unlike the six teachers. Great king, there was, further, in the kingdom of Śrāvastī, an outcaste named Vāyusa, who had killed immeasurable people; upon seeing the Buddha's own disciple, Mahāmaudgalyāyana, he was at once able to break through the cause leading to hell, and was reborn above, among the Trāyastriṃśa gods. It is because such a noble disciple as this exists that the Tathāgata, the Buddha, is called the unsurpassed physician, unlike the six teachers."

Chinese Source

「大王!波羅捺城,有長者子,名阿逸多,婬匿其母,以是因緣,殺戮其父。其母復與外人共通,子既知已,便復害之。有阿羅漢是其知識,於此知識復生愧恥,即便殺之。殺已即到祇桓精舍,求欲出家。時諸比丘具知此人有三逆罪,無敢聽者。以不聽故,倍生瞋恚,即於其夜大放猛火,焚燒僧坊,多殺無辜。然後復往王舍城中,至如來所求哀出家。如來即聽,為說法要,令其重罪漸漸輕微,發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心。是故稱佛為世良醫,非六師也。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"Great king, there was, in the city of Vārāṇasī, a householder's son named Ajita, who committed incest with his own mother in secret, and, on account of this very deed, murdered his own father. His mother then took up with another man in turn, and the son, learning of it, killed her as well. There was an arhat who was his own close friend, and, feeling shame and disgrace before this very friend, he killed him too. Having killed him, he went at once to the Jetavana monastery, seeking to become a renunciant. The monks there, knowing full well that this man bore three of the gravest offenses, dared not admit him. Refused, his anger and resentment redoubled, and, that very night, he set a great and fierce fire, burning down the monks' own quarters and killing many innocent people. He then went on to the city of Rājagṛha, and, coming to where the Tathāgata was, begged in anguish to become a renunciant. The Tathāgata admitted him at once, and expounded the essentials of the Dharma for him, causing his own grave crimes to grow gradually lighter, until he gave rise to the mind of unsurpassed, complete awakening. It is for this very reason that the Buddha is called the world's own good physician, unlike the six teachers."

Chinese Source

「大王!王本性暴惡,信受惡人提婆達多,放大醉象欲令踐佛。象既見佛,即時醒悟。佛便申手摩其頂上,復為說法,悉令得發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心。大王!畜生見佛,猶得破壞畜生業果,況復人耶?大王當知,若見佛者,所有重罪必當得滅。「大王!世尊未得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提時,魔與無量無邊眷屬至菩薩所。菩薩爾時以忍辱力壞魔惡心,令魔受法,尋發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心。佛有如是大功德力。

Ru-Yi Translation

"Great king, the king himself, by nature violent and evil, once trusted the wicked man Devadatta, and released a great, drunken elephant, hoping it would trample the Buddha underfoot. Yet, the moment the elephant saw the Buddha, it awoke to sobriety at once. The Buddha reached out his hand and stroked the crown of its head, and then expounded the Dharma for it, causing it, too, to give rise to the mind of unsurpassed, complete awakening. Great king, if even an animal, upon seeing the Buddha, can have its own animal karmic fruit broken through in this way, how much more so a human being? The great king should know that, should he see the Buddha, every grave crime of his must certainly be extinguished as well. Great king, before the World-Honored One had yet attained unsurpassed, complete awakening, Māra, together with an immeasurable, boundless retinue, came to where the bodhisattva was. The bodhisattva, at that time, through the power of patient forbearance, broke through Māra's own evil intent, causing Māra to accept the Dharma, and Māra, too, thereupon gave rise to the mind of unsurpassed, complete awakening. The Buddha possesses great meritorious power of exactly this kind."

Chinese Source

「大王!有壙野鬼,多害眾生。如來爾時為善賢長者,至壙野村為其說法。時壙野鬼聞法歡喜,即以長者授於如來,然後便發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心。「大王!波羅㮈國有屠兒,名曰廣額,於日日中,殺無量羊。見舍利弗,即受八戒經一日一夜,以是因緣,命終得為北方天王毘沙門子。如來弟子尚有如是大功德果,況復佛也?「大王!北天竺有城,名曰細石,其城有王,名曰龍印,貪國重位,戮害其父。害其父已,心生悔恨,即捨國政,來至佛所,求哀出家。佛言:『善來。』即成比丘,重罪消滅,發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心。大王當知,佛有如是無量無邊大功德果。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"Great king, there was a demon of the wilderness who harmed a great many beings. The Tathāgata, at that time, appeared as the householder Sudhana, and went to the wilderness village to teach the Dharma to this demon. The demon, hearing the Dharma, rejoiced, and thereupon surrendered the householder himself into the Tathāgata's own hands, after which the demon, too, gave rise to the mind of unsurpassed, complete awakening. Great king, there was, in the kingdom of Vārāṇasī, a butcher named Vipula, who killed innumerable sheep, day after day. Upon seeing Śāriputra, he undertook the eight precepts for a single day and night, and, on account of this very deed, upon his death, he became a son of Vaiśravaṇa, the heavenly king of the north. If even the Tathāgata's own disciple can bring about so great a meritorious fruit as this, how much more so the Buddha himself? Great king, in northern India, there was a city named Fine Stone, whose king, named Nāgamudrā, coveting the weighty position of the throne, murdered his own father. Having murdered his father, remorse arose in his mind, and he abandoned the affairs of the kingdom entirely, and came to where the Buddha was, begging in anguish to become a renunciant. The Buddha said: 'Welcome.' He at once became a monk, his grave crime was extinguished, and he gave rise to the mind of unsurpassed, complete awakening. The great king should know that the Buddha possesses immeasurable, boundless meritorious fruit of exactly this kind."

Chinese Source

「大王!如來有弟提婆達多,破壞眾僧,出佛身血,害蓮花比丘尼,作三逆罪。如來為說種種法要,令其重罪尋得微薄。是故如來為大良醫,非六師也。「大王!若能信臣語者,唯願速往至如來所,若不見信,願善思之。大王!諸佛世尊大悲普覆,不限一人,正法弘廣,無所不苞,怨親平等心無憎愛,終不偏為一人令得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,餘人不得。如來非獨四部之師,普是一切天人、龍、鬼、地獄、畜生、餓鬼等師,一切眾生亦當視佛如父母想。大王當知,如來不但獨為豪貴之人跋提迦王而演說法,亦為下賤優波離等。不獨偏受須達多阿那邠坻所奉飯食,亦受貧人須達多食。不但獨為舍利弗等利根說法,亦為鈍根周梨槃特。不但獨聽大迦葉等無貪之性出家求道,亦聽大貪難陀出家。不但獨聽煩惱薄者優樓頻螺迦葉等出家求道,亦聽煩惱深厚造重罪者波斯匿王弟優陀耶出家求道。不以莎草恭敬供養拔其瞋根,鴦崛摩羅惡心欲害捨而不救。不但獨為有智男子而演說法,亦為極愚牉合智者女人說法。不但獨令出家之人得四道果,亦令在家得三道果。不但獨為富多羅等捨諸怱務閑寂思惟而說法要,亦為頻婆娑羅王等統領國事理王務者而說法要。不但獨為斷酒之人,亦為耽酒郁伽長者荒醉者說。不但獨為入禪定者離婆多等,亦為喪子亂心婆羅門女婆私吒說。不但獨為己之弟子,亦為外道尼乾子說。不但獨為盛壯之年二十五者,亦為衰老八十者說。不但獨為根熟之人,亦為善根未熟者說。不但獨為末利夫人,亦為婬女蓮花女說。不但獨受波斯匿王上饌甘味,亦受長者尸利毱多雜毒之食。大王當知,尸利毱多往昔亦作逆罪之因,以遇佛聞法,即發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心。

「大王!假使一月常以衣食供養恭敬一切眾生,不如有人一念念佛,所得功德十六分一。大王!假使鍛金為人車馬載寶,其數各百以用布施,不如有人發心向佛舉足一步。大王!假使復以象車百乘載大秦國種種珍寶,及其女人身佩瓔珞數亦滿百,持用布施,猶故不如發心向佛舉足一步。復置是事,若以四事供養三千大千世界所有眾生,猶亦不如發心向佛舉足一步。復置是事,若使大王供養恭敬恒河沙等無量眾生,不如一往娑羅雙樹到如來所誠心聽法。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"Great king, the Tathāgata has a younger cousin, Devadatta, who broke apart the Saṅgha, drew the Buddha's own blood, and killed the nun Utpalavarṇā, committing three of the gravest offenses. The Tathāgata expounded every kind of essential teaching for him, causing his own grave crimes swiftly to grow light. It is for this very reason that the Tathāgata is the great, good physician, unlike the six teachers. Great king, should you be able to trust your servant's own words, I beg you to hasten at once to where the Tathāgata is; and, should you not trust them, I beg you to consider this well all the same. Great king, every buddha, every world-honored one, extends his great compassion universally, without limiting it to any single person; the true Dharma is vast and broad, embracing everything without exception; regarding friend and foe with perfect equality, his mind holds neither hatred nor favoritism, and he never, in the end, shows partiality toward any single person alone, causing him to attain unsurpassed, complete awakening while withholding it from everyone else. The Tathāgata is not the teacher of the fourfold assembly alone, but is, universally, the teacher of every god, human, dragon, spirit, denizen of hell, animal, and hungry ghost — and every being, too, should regard the Buddha as though he were their own father and mother. The great king should know: the Tathāgata does not expound the Dharma for the noble and eminent King Bhadrika alone, but also for the lowly Upāli. He does not receive only the food offered by the wealthy elder Anāthapiṇḍada, but also the food of the poor man likewise named Sudatta. He does not teach only the sharp-witted Śāriputra and those like him, but also the dull-witted Cūḍapanthaka. He does not permit only those of a naturally unacquisitive disposition, like Mahākāśyapa, to become renunciants and seek the path, but also permits the greatly acquisitive Nanda to become a renunciant. He does not permit only those of slight affliction, like Uruvilvā-Kāśyapa, to become renunciants and seek the path, but also permits Udāyin, King Prasenajit's own brother, whose affliction runs deep and who has committed grave crimes, to become a renunciant and seek the path as well. He did not reach out only to offer respectful reverence with a blade of kuśa grass to draw out the root of anger, while abandoning and refusing to save Aṅgulimāla, whose evil mind sought to kill him. He does not expound the Dharma only for men of wisdom, but teaches, too, the extremely foolish and dim-witted woman. He does not cause only renunciants to attain the four fruits of the path, but causes those who remain householders to attain three of these fruits as well. He does not expound the essentials of the Dharma only for those like Pūrṇa, who has set aside every busy affair to contemplate in quiet leisure, but also for those like King Bimbisāra, who governs the affairs of state and administers the business of the realm. He does not teach only those who abstain from wine, but teaches, too, the elder Ugra, sodden and besotted, addicted to drink. He does not teach only those absorbed in meditative concentration, like Revata, but teaches, too, the brahmin woman Vāsiṣṭhī, her mind deranged from the loss of her child. He does not teach only his own disciples, but teaches, too, the followers of other schools, like the Nirgrantha. He does not teach only those in the full vigor of their youth, at twenty-five years of age, but teaches, too, the aged and infirm at eighty. He does not teach only those whose faculties are already ripe, but teaches, too, those whose wholesome roots have not yet ripened. He does not teach only Queen Mallikā, but teaches, too, the courtesan Utpalavarṇā. He does not accept only the fine and delicious food offered by King Prasenajit, but also accepted the poisoned food offered by the elder Śrīgupta. The great king should know that Śrīgupta, too, in ages past, was himself the very cause of a grave offense, and yet, upon encountering the Buddha and hearing the Dharma, at once gave rise to the mind of unsurpassed, complete awakening.

"Great king, were one to spend an entire month forever making offerings of clothing and food, in reverence, to every being, this would still not equal one sixteenth of the merit that a single person gains through a single thought of recollecting the Buddha. Great king, were one to have gold forged into figures of men, chariots, and horses laden with treasure, a hundred of each, and give them all away in charity, this would still not equal the merit of a single person who, giving rise to the resolve to turn toward the Buddha, takes but a single step in his direction. Great king, were one, further, to give away a hundred chariots drawn by elephants, laden with every kind of treasure from the land of Da Qin, together with a hundred women adorned with jeweled ornaments upon their bodies, this would still not equal the merit of giving rise to the resolve to turn toward the Buddha and taking but a single step. Let that matter rest — were one to make offerings of the four requisites to every being throughout a great trichiliocosm, this would still not equal the merit of giving rise to the resolve to turn toward the Buddha and taking but a single step. Let that matter rest as well — were the great king to make offerings, in reverence, to beings as numerous as the sands of the Gaṅgā, immeasurable in number, this would still not equal a single journey to the twin sāla trees, to where the Tathāgata is, to listen to the Dharma there with a sincere heart."

Reading note — after Huiyuan

Huiyuan reads this entire catalogue as Jīvaka's own answer to a structural problem: having just told the king that shame and remorse alone can save him, he must now show that the Buddha specifically, and not merely some abstract capacity for repentance, is the one physician equal to the case — so the passage moves from naming the Buddha (his epithets, his qualities, his location, then a long list of philosophical pairs the sūtra elsewhere treats as its own worldly/ultimate framework) into an escalating sequence of proof: first Śakra, a god, saved from his own fear of death through a chain of causal questioning (envy traced back through ignorance, heedlessness, inversion, all the way to doubt) that Huiyuan reads as a miniature of the twelve links of dependent origination applied to an emotional rather than cosmological chain; then Aṅgulimāla and Prince Suvīra, two humans already in the depths of active violence or injury; then hungry ghosts, whose very perception of reality is warped by their own karma (seeing fire where water flows); then blinded bandits, restored by voice alone before any teaching is even given; then a caṇḍāla, a incest-patricide-matricide-guru-murderer, a maddened elephant, and Māra himself — the sequence moving deliberately from the merely afflicted toward cases that look, at each step, less recoverable than the last, until it reaches Devadatta, the Buddha's own cousin, guilty of three of the five gravest offenses, the same category of crime as the king's own.

The long paired list beginning "he does not teach only the noble... but also the lowly" Huiyuan reads as the passage's own explicit thesis stated in propositional form, rather than through further narrative: the Buddha's compassion is defined by symmetry across every axis a hearer might imagine excludes them — rank, wealth, sharpness of mind, temperament, degree of affliction, sex, age, spiritual readiness, and social station — so that the king, hearing story after story of criminals more violent than himself being received without hesitation, cannot locate any criterion by which his own case might reasonably be the exception. The closing comparison of merits (a single step toward the Buddha outweighing a month of universal almsgiving, a hundred chariots of treasure, offerings to a trichiliocosm) Huiyuan treats as the same argument restated one final time in a different register — not that formal giving lacks value, but that it cannot substitute for the one thing this fascicle has been building toward since its opening line: the king must actually go.

The King Refuses to Go

Chinese Source

爾時大王答言:「耆婆!如來世尊性已調柔,故得調柔以為眷屬;如栴檀林,純以栴檀而為圍遶。如來清淨,所有眷屬亦復清淨。猶如大龍,純以諸龍而為眷屬。如來寂靜,所有眷屬亦復寂靜。如來無貪,所有眷屬亦復無貪。佛無煩惱,所有眷屬亦無煩惱。吾今既是極惡之人,惡業纏裹、其身臭穢、繫屬地獄,云何當得至如來所?吾設往者,恐不顧念接敘言說。卿雖勸吾令往佛所,然吾今日深自鄙悼,都無去心。」

Ru-Yi Translation

At that time, the great king answered: "Jīvaka, the Tathāgata, the World-Honored One, is by nature already gentle and tamed, and it is for this very reason that he has gathered a retinue that is, itself, gentle and tamed — just as a forest of sandalwood is surrounded only by sandalwood trees. The Tathāgata is pure, and so, too, is his entire retinue pure. It is like a great dragon, whose retinue is made up only of dragons. The Tathāgata is tranquil, and so, too, is his entire retinue tranquil. The Tathāgata is free of greed, and so, too, is his entire retinue free of greed. The Buddha is free of affliction, and so, too, is his entire retinue free of affliction. I myself, however, am now a man of the utmost evil, wrapped and bound in evil karma, my very body foul and stinking, already fettered and bound over to hell — how could I possibly come before the Tathāgata? Should I go there, I fear he would give me no regard at all, nor exchange a single word with me. Though you urge me to go to where the Buddha is, I, today, feel only the deepest self-loathing and grief, and have, in truth, not the slightest intention of going at all."

Reading note — after Huiyuan

Huiyuan reads the king's own refusal, structurally, as the mirror image of Jīvaka's preceding catalogue: where Jīvaka built his case entirely from the Buddha's own impartiality — that no category of person is excluded from his compassion — the king answers not by disputing a single fact in that catalogue, but by reasoning from an entirely different premise: that like gathers with like, and that his own present impurity is therefore, by its very nature, incompatible with approaching someone pure, regardless of whether that person would, in principle, receive him. Read this way, the king's five similes (sandalwood, purity, the dragon's retinue, tranquility, freedom from greed and affliction) are not a counter-argument to what Jīvaka has just said — they do not deny that the Buddha heals bandits, incest-murderers, and demons — but a separate, self-referential judgment about his own present fitness to appear at all, which is exactly the gap the coming voice from the sky is required to close, since no further argument about the Buddha's compassion could touch a refusal built on this particular foundation.

My Father's Voice

Chinese Source

爾時虛空尋出聲言:「無上佛法,將欲衰殄,甚深法河於是欲涸,大法明燈將滅不久,法山欲頹法船欲沈,法橋欲壞法殿欲崩,法幢欲倒法樹欲折,善友欲去,大怖將至,法餓眾生將至不久,煩惱疫病將欲流行,大闇時至渴法時來,魔王欣慶解釋甲冑,佛日將沒大涅槃山。大王!佛若去世,王之重惡更無治者。大王!汝今已造阿鼻地獄極重之業,以是業緣必受不疑。大王!阿者言無,鼻者名間,間無暫樂,故名無間。大王!假使一人獨墮是獄,其身長大八萬由延,遍滿其中間無空處,其身周匝受種種苦,設有多人身亦遍滿不相妨礙。大王!寒地獄中暫遇熱風以之為樂;熱地獄中暫遇寒風亦名為樂;活地獄中,設命終已,若聞活聲,即便還活;阿鼻地獄都無此事。大王!阿鼻地獄四方有門,一一門外各有猛火,東西南北交過通徹八萬由延,周匝鐵牆、鐵網彌覆,其地亦鐵,上火徹下,下火徹上。大王!若魚在鏊,脂膏焦然,是中罪人,亦復如是。大王!作一逆者,則便具受如是一罪,若造二逆罪則二倍,五逆具者罪亦五倍。大王!我今定知王之惡業必不得免。唯願大王速往佛所,除佛世尊,餘無能救。我今愍汝,故相勸導。」

Ru-Yi Translation

At that time, a voice suddenly issued forth from empty space, saying: "The unsurpassed Buddha-dharma is about to decline and perish; this very deep river of the Dharma is about to run dry; the great, bright lamp of the Dharma is about to be extinguished before long; the mountain of the Dharma is about to crumble, the ship of the Dharma is about to sink; the bridge of the Dharma is about to collapse, the hall of the Dharma is about to fall into ruin; the banner of the Dharma is about to topple, the tree of the Dharma is about to snap; the good and wise friend is about to depart, and great terror is about to arrive; beings starved of the Dharma will soon appear before long; the plague of affliction is about to spread abroad; the time of great darkness has come, the time of thirst for the Dharma has arrived; the demon king rejoices and loosens his own armor, as the sun of the Buddha is about to set behind the mountain of great nirvāṇa. Great king, should the Buddha depart from this world, your own grave evil shall have no one left at all to cure it. Great king, you have now already created the extremely grave karma that leads to the Avīci hell, and, on account of this very karma, you must certainly undergo its fruit, without any doubt at all. Great king, 'a' means without, and 'vīci' means interval — where there is not the slightest interval of respite, this is what is meant by 'without interval.' Great king, suppose a single person alone were to fall into this hell — his own body would grow to a length of eighty thousand leagues, filling it entirely, without the slightest empty space remaining, and his body, on every side, would undergo every kind of suffering; and, should many people fall into it at once, their bodies, too, would each fill it entirely, without impeding one another in the slightest. Great king, in the cold hells, one who encounters, for even a moment, a warm wind counts it as a pleasure; in the hot hells, one who encounters, for even a moment, a cool wind counts it, too, as a pleasure; in the reviving hells, should one's life come to an end, upon hearing a certain sound, one is at once revived once more — but in the Avīci hell, there is nothing of this kind at all. Great king, the Avīci hell has gates on all four sides, and, outside each and every gate, there burns a fierce fire, passing through and connecting in every direction, east, west, south, and north, across the full eighty thousand leagues; it is entirely surrounded by walls of iron and nets of iron that cover it over completely, and even its very ground is iron, the fire above passing through to below, and the fire below passing through to above. Great king, it is like a fish placed upon a griddle, its very fat and flesh scorched and blackened — the guilty beings within this hell are exactly the same. Great king, one who commits a single one of the five gravest offenses undergoes this suffering in its full measure just once; should one commit two of these offenses, the suffering is doubled; and should one commit all five in full, the suffering, too, is multiplied fivefold. Great king, I now know for certain that you shall by no means escape the fruit of your own evil karma. I beg the great king to hasten at once to where the Buddha is — apart from the Buddha, the World-Honored One, there is no one else at all who can save you. It is out of pity for you that I now offer you this counsel."

Chinese Source

爾時大王聞是語已,心懷怖懼,舉身戰慄,五體掉動如芭蕉樹,仰而答曰:「汝為是誰?不現色像,而但有聲。」「大王!吾是汝父頻婆娑羅。汝今當隨耆婆所說,莫隨邪見六臣之言。」時王聞已,悶絕躄地,身瘡增劇,臭穢倍前,雖以冷藥塗而治之,瘡烝毒熱,但增無損。

Ru-Yi Translation

At that time, the great king, hearing these words, was filled with terror and dread, his whole body trembling, his five limbs shaking like a plantain tree in the wind, and he looked up and answered: "Who are you? You show no bodily form at all, but only a voice." "Great king, I am your own father, Bimbisāra. You should now follow what Jīvaka has told you, and not follow the words of your six ministers of wrong view." Hearing this, the king fainted at once and fell to the ground; the sores upon his body grew even more severe, their foulness doubled from before, and, though cooling medicine was applied to treat them, the sores only burned and festered all the more, growing worse without the slightest relief.

Reading note — after Huiyuan

Huiyuan reads the sky-voice's opening litany — river running dry, lamp going out, mountain crumbling, ship sinking, bridge collapsing, banner toppling, tree snapping — as a deliberate change of register from everything said before it: the six ministers argued philosophy, and Jīvaka argued through narrative example, but this voice argues through urgency alone, piling up image after image of irreversible loss to produce dread rather than to persuade, because its actual function, on his reading, is not to add one more argument to the pile but to break the king's specific refusal from the previous section — a refusal grounded not in disbelief but in a settled conviction that he is simply too impure to approach the Buddha at all, a position no further reasoning about the Buddha's compassion could touch, but which raw terror at total, final loss can override where argument cannot.

On the Avīci description itself, Huiyuan glosses "無間" (without interval) as bearing four distinct senses worth holding apart, though the passage itself develops only the last: the retributive process is without interval (death and rebirth into the hell follow one another instantly, with no interval of any other state between them); the body itself is without interval (it fills the entire hell, however many beings enter, with no empty space remaining, exactly as the passage describes); the lifespan there is without interval (one full kalpa, unbroken); and the suffering itself is without interval (pain follows pain with no interval of relief at all) — this fourth sense, he notes, is the one this passage actually elaborates, and he adds that the Abhidharma tradition assigns a separate kalpa to each of the five gravest offenses individually, whereas this sūtra (in agreement, he notes, with the Āgamas) has all five offenses share a single kalpa, their severity registering as intensified suffering within it rather than as additional time.

On the voice's identity, Huiyuan reads the king's own three distinct reasons for fainting as worth separating rather than treated as one undifferentiated shock: first, terror that the Buddha might indeed pass away with his own crime still untreated; second, dread of the hell just described now confirmed as his own certain destination; and third, and perhaps sharpest, sheer grief at hearing his own murdered father's voice address him with continued tenderness rather than condemnation — urging him toward the very physician who could save him, rather than toward the retribution he has just spent an entire fascicle being told he deserves. This closes the fascicle exactly where it opened: with a wound that will not heal, though now for a different reason — not because no cure exists, but because the king has not yet been able to bring himself to seek it.

Part 19 Complete

This closes Part 19 (fascicle 19 of 40), the whole of which stages the sūtra's central illustration of sick conduct: King Ajātaśatru's patricide and the psychosomatic wound of remorse it opens in him, six ministers each offering a different heterodox teacher's denial that the act carries any consequence at all, and the physician Jīvaka's counter-case — built from shame and remorse as two saving white dharmas, a careful distinction between the king's own treatable guilt and the icchantika's true incurability, and an escalating catalogue of everyone the Buddha has ever healed, from a god fearing death to his own cousin guilty of the same category of crime as the king himself. The fascicle ends unresolved: the king, still convinced his own impurity disqualifies him from approaching the Buddha at all, refuses to go, until a voice from the sky, warning that the Dharma itself is dying, reveals itself as his own murdered father, urging him toward Jīvaka's counsel rather than the six ministers' comfort — and the king, overwhelmed, only faints, his wound worse than before. Part 20 continues the same unbroken scene, as the Buddha's own light reaches out to heal the king before he has taken a single step toward him.

Continue to Part 20 →