Part 29 of 40 · Fascicle 29 · 師子吼菩薩品第十一之三 · 大般涅槃經 T0374 (Northern Edition)

The Candle-Wax Seal

If the five aggregates arise and perish moment by moment, what exactly is bound by affliction, and what exactly is freed? Lion's Roar's question sends the Buddha through a candle's wax seal pressed into clay, a catalogue of eight kinds of scriptural simile, a stream-enterer whose precepts survive even rebirth in an evil land, and a debate over whether buddha-nature — shared by every being at once, yet never divided or used up — is one thing or many, like a single path walked by countless travelers. The fascicle closes with the Buddha's own account of why he chose humble Kuśinagara, rather than any of the six great cities, for his final teaching, and the story of the merchant Sudatta covering a garden floor with gold to build the Buddha a place to stay.

Translator: Ru-Yi Meditation Center Status: Part 29 of 40 Source: Taishō T0374, 大般涅槃經 (tr. Dharmakṣema, 421 CE) Reading notes after Huiyuan's 大般涅槃經義記 (T1764)

Bondage Without a Self to Bind

Chinese Source

◎師子吼言:「世尊!如佛所說,一切諸法有二種因:一者正因,二者緣因。以是二因,應無縛解。是五陰者,念念生滅,如其生滅,誰有縛解?世尊!因此五陰,生後五陰,此陰自滅,不至彼陰,雖不至彼,能生彼陰。如因子生芽,子不至芽,雖不至芽,而能生芽。眾生亦爾,云何縛解?」「善男子!諦聽,諦聽!我當為汝分別解說。善男子!如人捨命,受大苦時,宗親圍遶,號哭懊惱,其人惶怖,莫知依救。雖有五情,無所知覺,肢節戰動,不能自持,身體虛冷,煖氣欲盡,見先所修善惡報相。善男子!如日垂沒,山陵堆阜影現東移,理無西逝。眾生業果亦復如是,此陰滅時,彼陰續生,如燈生闇滅,燈滅闇生。善男子!如蠟印印泥,印與泥合,印滅文成,而是蠟印,不變在泥,文非泥出,不餘處來,以印因緣,而生是文。現在陰滅,中陰陰生,是現在陰,終不變為中陰五陰。中陰五陰,亦非自生,不從餘來。因現陰故,生中陰陰,如印印泥,印壞文成。名雖無差,而時節各異。是故我說中陰五陰,非肉眼見,天眼所見。是中陰中有三種食:一者思食,二者觸食,三者意食。中陰二種:一善業果,二惡業果。因善業故,得善覺觀;因惡業故,得惡覺觀。父母交會牉合之時,隨業因緣向受生處,於母生愛,於父生瞋。父精出時謂是己有,見已心悅,而生歡喜。以是三種煩惱因緣,中陰陰壞,生後五陰,如印印泥,印壞文成。生時諸根有具、不具,具者見色,則生於貪,生於貪故則名為愛。狂故生貪,是名無明。貪愛、無明二因緣故,所見境界皆悉顛倒,無常見常、無我見我、無樂見樂、無淨見淨。以四倒故,作善惡行,煩惱作業,業作煩惱,是名繫縛。以是義故,名五陰生。是人若得親近於佛及佛弟子、諸善知識,便得聞受十二部經,以聞法故觀善境界,觀善境界故得大智慧,大智慧者名正知見,得知見故於生死中而生悔心,生悔心故不生歡樂,不生歡樂故能破貪心,破貪心故修八聖道,修八聖道故得無生死,無生死故名得解脫。如火不遇薪,名之為滅,滅生死故,名為滅度。以是義故,名五陰滅。」

Ru-Yi Translation

Lion's Roar said: "World-Honored One, as the Buddha has taught, every dharma has two kinds of cause — the primary cause, and the conditional cause. Given these two causes, there ought to be no such thing as bondage or liberation at all. These five aggregates arise and perish moment by moment — given this constant arising and perishing, who, exactly, is bound, and who, exactly, is liberated? World-Honored One, it is in dependence on these very five aggregates that a later set of five aggregates arises — this aggregate ceases of itself, and never reaches that later one, and yet, though it never reaches it, it is able to produce it. It is like a seed producing a sprout: the seed never reaches the sprout, and yet, though it never reaches it, it is able to produce it. A being is exactly the same — how, then, could there be any bondage or liberation at all?" "Good son, listen closely, listen closely, and I shall distinguish and explain this fully for you. Good son, it is like a person casting off his own life, undergoing great suffering, surrounded by his own kin, who wail and grieve — this person, terrified, knows of nowhere to turn for refuge. Though his five senses remain, he has no awareness left at all; his limbs and joints tremble, unable to hold themselves steady; his body grows hollow and cold, its warmth nearly spent, and he sees before him the fruit of every wholesome and unwholesome deed he has ever performed. Good son, it is like the sun about to set: the shadow cast by a mountain ridge appears to move eastward, though, in truth, nothing at all has actually traveled westward. A being's own karmic fruit is exactly the same: as this aggregate ceases, that aggregate continues on and arises, exactly as a lamp being lit causes darkness to vanish, and a lamp going out causes darkness to arise once more. Good son, it is like a wax seal pressed into clay: the seal meets the clay, and, as the seal is lifted away, its impression comes to be formed — and yet this very wax seal itself does not remain, unchanged, within the clay, nor does the impression emerge out of the clay itself, nor does it come from anywhere else at all; it is only through the cause and condition of the seal that this very impression comes to arise. The present aggregates cease, and the intermediate-state aggregates arise — these present aggregates never themselves transform into the intermediate-state aggregates, and yet the intermediate-state aggregates, too, are not self-produced, nor do they come from anywhere else at all. It is only in dependence on the present aggregates that the intermediate-state aggregates arise, exactly as a seal is pressed into clay, and, as the seal is removed, its impression comes to be formed. Though the name remains without distinction, the moment of each is entirely different. It is for this very reason that I teach that the intermediate-state aggregates are not seen by the fleshly eye, but only by the heavenly eye. Within this intermediate state there are three kinds of nourishment: nourishment through intention, nourishment through contact, and nourishment through mental will. The intermediate state is of two kinds: the fruit of wholesome karma, and the fruit of unwholesome karma. Through wholesome karma, one attains wholesome thoughts and reflections; through unwholesome karma, one attains unwholesome thoughts and reflections. At the very moment a father and mother come together in union, this being, following the cause and condition of his own karma, moves toward the place of his own coming rebirth, giving rise to craving toward the mother and to resentment toward the father. At the moment the father's own seed is released, this being takes it to be his own, and, upon perceiving it, his mind delights, and joy arises within him. Through the cause and condition of these very three kinds of affliction, the intermediate-state aggregates disintegrate, and a later set of five aggregates arises, exactly as a seal is pressed into clay, and, as the seal is removed, its impression comes to be formed. At the moment of birth, the sense-faculties may be complete or incomplete — one whose faculties are complete, upon seeing a form, gives rise to craving, and, because craving has arisen, this is named attachment. Because of this delusion, craving arises, and this is named ignorance. Through the cause and condition of these two, craving-attachment and ignorance, every realm he perceives becomes entirely inverted: he sees the impermanent as permanent, the selfless as possessing a self, the joyless as joyful, and the impure as pure. On account of these four inversions, he performs wholesome and unwholesome deeds; affliction gives rise to karmic action, and karmic action gives rise to further affliction — this is what is named bondage. It is for this very reason that this is named the arising of the five aggregates. Should this person come to draw close to the Buddha, to the Buddha's own disciples, and to every kind of good friend, he thereby comes to hear and receive the twelve divisions of scripture; and, because he has heard the Dharma, he contemplates wholesome objects; and, because he contemplates wholesome objects, he attains great wisdom; and this great wisdom is named right view and right knowledge; and, because he has attained this right view and knowledge, he gives rise, within birth-and-death, to a mind of remorse; and, because he has given rise to this mind of remorse, he no longer gives rise to any delight in it; and, because he no longer gives rise to delight, he is able to destroy his own craving mind; and, because he has destroyed his craving mind, he cultivates the eightfold noble path; and, because he cultivates the eightfold noble path, he attains freedom from birth-and-death; and, because he attains freedom from birth-and-death, this is named the attainment of liberation. It is exactly as when a fire, meeting no further fuel, is named extinguished — and, because birth-and-death is thereby extinguished, this is named final extinction. It is for this very reason that this is named the cessation of the five aggregates."

Reading note — Ru-Yi

Lion's Roar's challenge here presses the two-causes framework from the previous fascicle to its logical breaking point: if nothing genuinely persists from one moment's aggregates to the next — a seed never literally becomes the sprout it produces — then there seems to be no continuous subject left over for either bondage or liberation to happen to. The candle-wax seal simile is this section's answer, and it is worth reading carefully against the two more familiar images (the sunset shadow, the lamp and darkness) it sits between: unlike those two, which illustrate mere succession, the seal-and-clay image adds a crucial further element — a genuine, non-arbitrary causal relation between what came before and what comes after (the impression's shape is not random; it is entirely determined by the seal, even though the seal itself is never "in" the clay). This gives the sūtra a middle position between two unwanted extremes: not a persisting self carried forward unchanged (which momentary arising-and-ceasing rules out), and not mere unrelated succession either (which would make karmic continuity arbitrary) — but a strict, shaped dependency of the next moment on the last, without any single thing traveling between them.

The extended account of the intermediate state (中陰) — its three kinds of nourishment, its origin in an inverted perception of the parents at the moment of conception, and its own dissolution into a next life's aggregates through the very same three afflictions (craving toward the mother, resentment toward the father, and the misappropriation of the father's seed as "one's own") — completes this picture by showing exactly how the shaping actually happens: it is not an impersonal mechanical process but is driven, at each transition, by a specific structure of desire and aversion, which is why the closing twelve-step chain (hearing the Dharma → contemplating what is wholesome → wisdom → right view → remorse → freedom from delight → freedom from craving → the eightfold path → freedom from birth-and-death → liberation) can intervene in this same chain and redirect it, exactly where the earlier chain of ignorance and craving once ran unchecked.

Is There Anything There to Be Bound?

Chinese Source

師子吼言:「空中無刺,云何言拔?陰無繫者,云何繫縛?」佛言:「善男子!以煩惱鎖,繫縛五陰,離五陰已無別煩惱,離煩惱已無別五陰。善男子!如柱持屋,離屋無柱,離柱無屋。眾生五陰亦復如是,有煩惱故名為繫縛,無煩惱故名為解脫。善男子!如拳、合掌、繫結等三,合散生滅更無別法。眾生五陰亦復如是,有煩惱故名為繫縛,無煩惱故名為解脫。善男子!如說名色、繫縛、眾生,名色若滅則無眾生,離名色已無別眾生,離眾生已無別名色,亦名名色繫縛眾生,亦名眾生繫縛名色。」師子吼言:「世尊!如眼不自見,指不自觸,刀不自割,受不自受,云何如來說言名色繫縛名色?何以故言名色者即是眾生?言眾生者即是名色?若言名色繫縛眾生,即是名色繫縛名色。」佛言:「善男子!如二手合時,更無異法而來合也。名之與色亦復如是,以是義故,我言名色繫縛眾生。若離名色則得解脫,是故我言眾生解脫。」師子吼言:「世尊!若有名色是繫縛者,諸阿羅漢未離名色,亦應繫縛。」「善男子!解脫二種:一者子斷,二者果斷。言子斷者,名斷煩惱,阿羅漢等已斷煩惱,眾結爛壞,是故子結不能繫縛。未斷果故,名果繫縛,諸阿羅漢不見佛性,以不見故,不得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。以是義故,可言果繫,不得說言名色繫縛。善男子!譬如然燈,油未盡時,明則不滅,若油盡者,滅則無疑。善男子!所言油者喻諸煩惱,燈喻眾生。一切眾生,煩惱油故,不入涅槃,若得斷者,則入涅槃。」師子吼言:「世尊!燈之與油,二性各異。眾生煩惱則不如是,眾生即是煩惱,煩惱即是眾生。眾生名五陰,五陰名眾生。五陰名煩惱,煩惱名五陰,云何如來喻之於燈?」

Ru-Yi Translation

Lion's Roar said: "There is no thorn in empty space at all — how, then, could one speak of 'pulling it out'? If the aggregates have nothing binding them, how, then, could there be any bondage at all?" The Buddha said: "Good son, it is through the chain of affliction that the five aggregates are bound — apart from the five aggregates, there is no separate affliction, and apart from affliction, there is no separate set of five aggregates. Good son, it is like a pillar supporting a house: apart from the house, there is no pillar, and apart from the pillar, there is no house. A being's own five aggregates are exactly the same: because affliction is present, this is named bondage; because affliction is absent, this is named liberation. Good son, it is like a fist, a joined palm, and a knot: their coming together and their coming apart, their arising and their ceasing, are never some further, separate thing beyond the coming together and coming apart itself. A being's own five aggregates are exactly the same: because affliction is present, this is named bondage; because affliction is absent, this is named liberation. Good son, it is as one speaks of name-and-form binding a being: should name-and-form cease, there is then no being at all — apart from name-and-form, there is no separate being, and apart from a being, there is no separate name-and-form. It may equally be said that name-and-form binds a being, or that a being binds name-and-form." Lion's Roar said: "World-Honored One, just as an eye cannot see itself, a finger cannot touch itself, a knife cannot cut itself, and feeling cannot feel itself — how, then, can the Tathāgata teach that name-and-form binds name-and-form? Why is it said that name-and-form is itself nothing other than a being, and that a being is itself nothing other than name-and-form? If it is said that name-and-form binds a being, this is itself already saying that name-and-form binds name-and-form." The Buddha said: "Good son, it is like the joining of two hands: no further, separate thing at all comes along to bring about this joining. Name and form are exactly the same — it is for this very reason that I say name-and-form binds a being. And, should one depart from name-and-form, one thereby attains liberation — it is for this very reason that I say a being attains liberation." Lion's Roar said: "World-Honored One, if it is name-and-form that constitutes bondage, then every arhat, not yet having departed from name-and-form, ought likewise still to be bound." "Good son, liberation is of two kinds: the severing of the seed, and the severing of the fruit. The severing of the seed is named the severing of affliction — the arhat has already severed affliction, and every fetter has rotted away entirely, and it is for this reason that the seed-fetter is no longer able to bind him. Yet, because he has not yet severed the fruit, this is named being bound by the fruit — every arhat fails to see buddha-nature, and it is only because he fails to see it that he fails to attain unsurpassed, complete awakening. It is for this very reason that one may speak of being bound by the fruit, though one cannot say that name-and-form itself still binds him. Good son, it is like a lit lamp: while its oil is not yet exhausted, its light does not go out — and, once its oil is exhausted, it is beyond doubt that it will go out. Good son, this very oil is a likeness for affliction, and the lamp is a likeness for a being. Every being, on account of the oil of affliction, fails to enter nirvāṇa — and, should he attain its severing, he thereupon enters nirvāṇa." Lion's Roar said: "World-Honored One, a lamp and its oil are two entirely distinct natures — a being and his own affliction are not like this at all. A being is himself nothing other than affliction, and affliction is itself nothing other than a being. A being is named the five aggregates, and the five aggregates are named a being; the five aggregates are named affliction, and affliction is named the five aggregates — how, then, can the Tathāgata illustrate this through the likeness of a lamp?"

Reading note — Ru-Yi

Lion's Roar's opening image — no thorn in empty space, nothing to pull out — presses a mereological worry the previous section's causal account did not fully settle: even granting a genuine, shaped dependency between successive moments, if the five aggregates themselves just are what gets called a "being," there seems to be no further, separate thing left over to serve as either the binder or the bound. The Buddha's answer, through the pillar-and-house, fist-and-hand, and name-and-form pairings, embraces this mutual dependency rather than resisting it: bondage is not one thing (affliction) acting upon a separate other thing (the aggregates) any more than a house is one thing propped up by a separate pillar — the two terms are mutually defining, each meaningless without the other, exactly as a closed hand simply is what "fist" names, with no further fist-substance added to plain fingers.

The arhat objection sharpens this into the fascicle's own version of a puzzle raised already in Part 26 (the difference between "nirvāṇa" and "great nirvāṇa"): if bondage just is the aggregates-plus-affliction pairing, and the arhat still possesses aggregates, how is he not still bound? The seed/fruit distinction answers by splitting "liberation" itself into two grades — severing the seed (affliction itself, which the arhat genuinely accomplishes) and severing the fruit (the still-unseen buddha-nature this liberation does not yet reach) — which is also why Lion's Roar's final challenge to the lamp-and-oil simile lands so well: a lamp and its oil really are separable in a way a being and his own affliction are not, and the section closes without fully answering this last objection, setting up the very reframing — through a formal typology of how similes are meant to be read — that opens the next section.

Eight Kinds of Simile

Chinese Source

佛言:「善男子!喻有八種:一者順喻,二者逆喻,三者現喻,四者非喻,五者先喻,六者後喻,七者先後喻,八者遍喻。云何順喻?如經中說,天降大雨,溝瀆皆滿,溝瀆滿故小坑滿,小坑滿故大坑滿,大坑滿故小泉滿,小泉滿故大泉滿,大泉滿故小池滿,小池滿故大池滿,大池滿故小河滿,小河滿故大河滿,大河滿故大海滿。如來法雨亦復如是,眾生戒滿,戒滿足故不悔心滿,不悔心滿故歡喜滿,歡喜滿故遠離滿,遠離滿故安隱滿,安隱滿故三昧滿,三昧滿故正知見滿,正知見滿故厭離滿,厭離滿故呵責滿,呵責滿故解脫滿,解脫滿故涅槃滿,是名順喻。「云何逆喻?大海有本所謂大河,大河有本所謂小河,小河有本所謂大池,大池有本所謂小池,小池有本所謂大泉,大泉有本所謂小泉,小泉有本所謂大坑,大坑有本所謂小坑,小坑有本所謂溝瀆,溝瀆有本所謂大雨。涅槃有本所謂解脫,解脫有本所謂呵責,呵責有本所謂厭離,厭離有本所謂正知見,正知見有本所謂三昧,三昧有本所謂安隱,安隱有本所謂遠離,遠離有本所謂喜心,喜心有本所謂不悔,不悔有本所謂持戒,持戒有本所謂法雨,是名逆喻。」

Ru-Yi Translation

The Buddha said: "Good son, simile is of eight kinds: the forward simile, the reverse simile, the direct simile, the non-simile, the prior simile, the posterior simile, the prior-and-posterior simile, and the pervasive simile. What is the forward simile? It is as taught within scripture: heaven sends down a great rain, and every ditch and channel becomes full; because the ditches and channels are full, the small pits become full; because the small pits are full, the great pits become full; because the great pits are full, the small springs become full; because the small springs are full, the great springs become full; because the great springs are full, the small pools become full; because the small pools are full, the great pools become full; because the great pools are full, the small rivers become full; because the small rivers are full, the great rivers become full; and because the great rivers are full, the great ocean becomes full. The Tathāgata's own rain of Dharma is exactly the same: as a being's own precept-keeping becomes full, because his precept-keeping is fully complete, a mind free of regret becomes full; because this mind free of regret is full, joy becomes full; because joy is full, departure becomes full; because departure is full, tranquility becomes full; because tranquility is full, samādhi becomes full; because samādhi is full, right view and right knowledge become full; because right view and right knowledge are full, disenchantment becomes full; because disenchantment is full, self-censure becomes full; because self-censure is full, liberation becomes full; and because liberation is full, nirvāṇa becomes full. This is named the forward simile. "What is the reverse simile? The great ocean has its own origin, namely the great rivers; the great rivers have their own origin, namely the small rivers; the small rivers have their own origin, namely the great pools; the great pools have their own origin, namely the small pools; the small pools have their own origin, namely the great springs; the great springs have their own origin, namely the small springs; the small springs have their own origin, namely the great pits; the great pits have their own origin, namely the small pits; the small pits have their own origin, namely the ditches and channels; and the ditches and channels have their own origin, namely the great rain. Nirvāṇa has its own origin, namely liberation; liberation has its own origin, namely self-censure; self-censure has its own origin, namely disenchantment; disenchantment has its own origin, namely right view and right knowledge; right view and right knowledge have their own origin, namely samādhi; samādhi has its own origin, namely tranquility; tranquility has its own origin, namely departure; departure has its own origin, namely a joyful mind; a joyful mind has its own origin, namely freedom from regret; and freedom from regret has its own origin, namely precept-keeping; and precept-keeping has its own origin, namely the rain of the Dharma. This is named the reverse simile."

Chinese Source

「云何現喻?如經中說,眾生心性猶如獼猴,獼猴之性捨一取一。眾生心性亦復如是,取著色、聲、香、味、觸、法,無暫住時,是名現喻。「云何非喻?如我昔告波斯匿王:『大王!有親信人從四方來,各作是言:「大王!有四大山,從四方來,欲害人民。」王若聞者當設何計?』王言:『世尊!設有此來,無逃避處,惟當專心持戒布施。』我即讚言:『善哉,大王!我說四山,即是眾生生老病死。生老病死常來切人。云何大王不修戒施?』王言:『世尊!持戒、布施得何等果?』我言:『大王!於人天中多受快樂。』王言:『世尊!尼拘陀樹持戒布施,亦於人天受安隱耶?』我言:『大王!尼拘陀樹不能持戒修行布施,如其能者則受無異。』是名非喻。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"What is the direct simile? It is as taught within scripture: a being's own mind and nature are just like a monkey — a monkey's own nature is to release one thing the moment it grasps another. A being's own mind and nature are exactly the same, grasping after and clinging to form, sound, fragrance, flavor, touch, and mental objects, never resting still for even a single moment. This is named the direct simile. "What is the non-simile? It is as I once said to King Prasenajit: 'Great king, suppose there were trusted messengers who came from each of the four directions, each one saying: "Great king, there are four great mountains, coming from each of the four directions, wishing to destroy the people." Upon hearing this, great king, what plan would you devise?' The king said: 'World-Honored One, were such a thing truly to come, there would be no place at all to flee to — one could only single-mindedly uphold the precepts and practice giving.' I then praised him, saying: 'Excellent, great king! These four mountains I speak of are none other than birth, old age, sickness, and death — birth, old age, sickness, and death forever come to press upon a person. Why, then, great king, do you not cultivate precept-keeping and giving?' The king said: 'World-Honored One, what fruit is attained through precept-keeping and giving?' I said: 'Great king, one thereby receives abundant happiness among gods and humans.' The king said: 'World-Honored One, could a nyagrodha tree, too, uphold the precepts and practice giving, and likewise receive tranquil happiness among gods and humans?' I said: 'Great king, a nyagrodha tree is unable to uphold the precepts or practice giving — were it able to do so, it would receive exactly the same reward, without any difference at all.' This is named the non-simile."

Chinese Source

「云何先喻?我經中說,譬如有人貪著妙花,採取之時為水所漂。眾生亦爾,貪受五欲,為生死水之所漂沒,是名先喻。「云何後喻?如《法句》說:『莫輕小罪,以為無殃。水渧雖微,漸盈大器。』是名後喻。「云何先後喻?譬如芭蕉生果則死,愚人得養亦復如是,如騾懷妊命不久全。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"What is the prior simile? It is as taught within my own scripture: it is like a man who, craving a beautiful flower, is swept away by the current while gathering it. A being is exactly the same: craving and receiving the five desires, he is swept away and submerged by the waters of birth-and-death. This is named the prior simile. "What is the posterior simile? It is as taught in the Dharmapada: 'Never make light of a small transgression, thinking it brings no misfortune — though a drop of water is small, it gradually comes to fill a great vessel.' This is named the posterior simile. "What is the prior-and-posterior simile? It is like the plantain tree, which dies once it bears fruit — a foolish person, once nourished with such indulgence, meets exactly the same fate; it is like a mule that, once she conceives, does not long remain whole in life."

Chinese Source

「云何遍喻?如經中說,三十三天有波利質多樹,其根入地深五由延,高百由延,枝葉四布五十由延,葉熟則黃。諸天見已心生歡喜,是葉不久必當墮落。其葉既落復生歡喜,是枝不久必當變色。枝既變色復生歡喜,是色不久必當生疱。見已復喜,是疱不久必當生嘴。見已復喜,是嘴不久必當開剖。開剖之時,香氣周遍五十由延,光明遠照八十由延,爾時諸天夏三月時在下受樂。善男子!我諸弟子亦復如是,葉色黃者,喻我弟子念欲出家。其葉落者,喻我弟子剃除鬚髮。其色變者,喻我弟子白四羯磨受具足戒。初生疱者,喻我弟子發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心。嘴者喻於十住菩薩得見佛性。開剖者喻於菩薩得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。香者喻於十方無量眾生受持禁戒。光者喻於如來名號無礙周遍十方。夏三月者喻三三昧。三十三天受快樂者,喻於諸佛在大涅槃得常樂我淨。是名遍喻。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"What is the pervasive simile? It is as taught within scripture: in the Trāyastriṃśa heaven there grows the pārijāta tree, its roots sinking five yojanas deep into the earth, its height a hundred yojanas, its branches and leaves spreading fifty yojanas in every direction; once its leaves ripen, they turn yellow. Seeing this, the gods give rise to a joyful mind, thinking: these leaves, before long, are certain to fall. Once these leaves have fallen, they again give rise to joy, thinking: these branches, before long, are certain to change color. Once the branches have changed color, they again give rise to joy, thinking: this color, before long, is certain to give rise to buds. Seeing this, they again give rise to joy, thinking: these buds, before long, are certain to give rise to sprouts. Seeing this, they again give rise to joy, thinking: these sprouts, before long, are certain to open and unfold. At the moment they open and unfold, their fragrance pervades fifty yojanas all around, and their radiance shines forth eighty yojanas in every direction, and, at that very time, throughout the three months of summer, the gods descend below to receive their own delight. Good son, my own disciples are exactly the same: the leaves turning yellow is a likeness for my disciples' own thought of becoming renunciants; the leaves falling is a likeness for my disciples shaving off their own hair and beard; the color changing is a likeness for my disciples receiving the full precepts through the fourfold formal proclamation; the first arising of the buds is a likeness for my disciples giving rise to the mind of unsurpassed, complete awakening; the sprouts are a likeness for the bodhisattva of the ten abidings attaining the seeing of buddha-nature; the opening and unfolding is a likeness for the bodhisattva attaining unsurpassed, complete awakening; the fragrance is a likeness for the immeasurable beings of the ten directions upholding the precepts; the radiance is a likeness for the Tathāgata's own name pervading, without obstruction, throughout the ten directions; the three months of summer are a likeness for the three samādhis; and the gods of the Trāyastriṃśa heaven receiving their own delight is a likeness for every buddha, dwelling within the great nirvāṇa, attaining permanence, bliss, self, and purity. This is named the pervasive simile."

Chinese Source

「善男子!凡所引喻不必盡取,或取少分、或取多分、或復全取。如言如來面如滿月,是名少分。善男子!譬如有人初不見乳,轉問他言:『乳為何類?』彼人答言:『如水、蜜、貝。』水則濕相,蜜則甜相,貝則色相。雖引三喻未即乳實。善男子!我言燈喻,喻於眾生,亦復如是。善男子!離水無河,眾生亦爾,離五陰已無別眾生。善男子!如離箱輿輪軸、輻輞,更無別車,眾生亦爾。善男子!若欲得合彼燈喻者,諦聽,諦聽,我今當說。炷者喻於二十五有,油者喻愛,明喻智慧,除破黑闇喻破無明,煖喻聖道。如燈油盡,明焰則滅,眾生愛盡,則見佛性,雖有名色不能繫縛。雖復處在二十五有,不為諸有之所污染。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"Good son, whenever a simile is drawn upon, it need not always be taken in its entirety — one may take only a small portion of it, or a greater portion of it, or else take it in its entirety. As when it is said that the Tathāgata's own face is like the full moon — this is a taking of only a small portion. Good son, it is like a man who has never yet seen milk, and who asks another: 'What kind of thing is milk?' That person answers: 'It is like water, like honey, like a conch shell.' Water gives its wet quality; honey gives its sweet quality; and the conch shell gives its color. Though these three similes are drawn upon, none of them is yet the reality of milk itself. Good son, when I speak of the lamp as a simile, illustrating a being, it is exactly the same. Good son, apart from water, there is no river; a being is exactly the same — apart from the five aggregates, there is no separate being. Good son, it is like a cart: apart from its box, its shaft, its wheels, its axle, its spokes, and its rim, there is no separate cart at all; a being is exactly the same. Good son, should you wish to have this very lamp simile properly and fully matched, listen closely, listen closely, and I shall now explain it. The wick is a likeness for the twenty-five states of existence; the oil is a likeness for craving; the light is a likeness for wisdom; the dispelling of the surrounding darkness is a likeness for the destruction of ignorance; and the warmth is a likeness for the noble path. It is exactly as when a lamp's oil is exhausted, its light and flame are extinguished — once a being's own craving is exhausted, he thereupon sees buddha-nature, and, though name-and-form still remain, they are no longer able to bind him. Though he still dwells among the twenty-five states of existence, he is no longer stained by any of them."

Reading note — Ru-Yi

This eightfold catalogue is a rare moment of explicit metalinguistic reflection within the sūtra itself — rather than simply deploying similes, the text pauses to classify how similes work, and the classification is itself doing real philosophical labor. The forward and reverse similes (water filling every vessel from ditch to ocean, then traced back from ocean to rain) model the same causal chain read in two directions — cultivation building toward nirvāṇa, and nirvāṇa's own conditions traced back to their root — showing that a single causal chain supports both a constructive and an analytical reading without contradiction. The "non-simile" is a pointed inclusion: King Prasenajit's exchange about the nyagrodha tree demonstrates that a simile can fail to transfer (a tree cannot keep precepts) precisely in order to mark the limit of a *different*, successful comparison (the four mountains as birth, old age, sickness, and death) — teaching the reader to ask, of any given simile, exactly how far its correspondence is meant to reach.

This last question is answered explicitly in the closing passage, which directly resolves the objection Lion's Roar raised against the lamp-and-oil simile at the end of the previous section: a being and his affliction are not, in fact, as separable as a lamp and its oil, but the sūtra's own theory of partial similes says this was never the point — "the Tathāgata's face is like the full moon" borrows only roundness and radiance, not the moon's own coldness or distance, and the milk-description-by-three-blind-men image (wetness, sweetness, whiteness — none of them milk itself) shows that even three similes together need not fully capture their target. Read this way, the lamp-and-oil simile was never claiming that a being and affliction are two separable substances; the corrected mapping given here — wick as the twenty-five states of existence, oil as craving, light as wisdom, warmth as the noble path — borrows only the specific relation of exhaustion-leading-to-extinction, which is exactly the relation the earlier bondage-and-liberation debate needed all along.

How Can What's Always Perishing Still Be a Path?

Chinese Source

師子吼言:「世尊!眾生五陰空無所有,誰有受教,修習道者?」佛言:「善男子!一切眾生,皆有念心、慧心、發心、勤精進心、信心、定心,如是等法雖念念生滅,猶故相似相續不斷,故名修道。」師子吼言:「世尊!如是等法,皆念念滅,是念念滅,亦相似相續,云何修習?」佛言:「善男子!如燈雖念念滅,而有光明除破闇冥,念等諸法亦復如是。善男子!如眾生食雖念念滅,亦令飢者而得飽滿。譬如上藥雖念念滅,亦能愈病。日月光明雖念念滅,亦能增長樹林草木。善男子!汝言念念滅云何增長者?心不斷故,名為增長。善男子!如人誦書,所誦字句不得一時,前不至中,中不至後。人之與字及以心想,俱念念滅,以久修故而得通利。善男子!譬如金師,從初習作至于皓首,雖念念滅前不至後,以積習故所作遂妙,是故得稱善好金師,讀誦經書亦復如是。善男子!譬如種子,地亦不教汝當生芽,以法性故,牙則自生,乃至花亦不教汝當作果,以法性故而果自生,眾生修道亦復如是。善男子!譬如數法,一不至二,二不至三,雖念念滅而至千萬,眾生修道亦復如是。善男子!如燈念念滅,初滅之焰,不教後焰,我滅汝生當破諸闇。善男子!譬如犢子生便求乳,求乳之智實無人教,雖念念滅,而初飢後飽。是故當知不應相似,若相似者不應異生。眾生修道亦復如是,初雖未增,以久修故,則能破壞一切煩惱。」

Ru-Yi Translation

Lion's Roar said: "World-Honored One, if a being's own five aggregates are empty and possess nothing at all, who, then, is it that receives instruction, and who, then, is it that cultivates the path?" The Buddha said: "Good son, every being, without exception, possesses a mind of mindfulness, a mind of wisdom, a mind of resolve, a mind of diligent exertion, a mind of faith, and a mind of concentration — dharmas of exactly this kind, though they arise and perish moment by moment, nonetheless continue on, similar and unbroken, one after the next, and it is for this very reason that this is named cultivating the path." Lion's Roar said: "World-Honored One, if dharmas of this kind all perish moment by moment, and this moment-by-moment perishing is merely similar and continuous, how, then, can this be called cultivation at all?" The Buddha said: "Good son, it is like a lamp, which, though it perishes moment by moment, still possesses a light that dispels the surrounding darkness — mindfulness and every dharma like it are exactly the same. Good son, it is like a being's own food, which, though it perishes moment by moment, is still able to cause one who is hungry to become full and satisfied. It is like the finest medicine, which, though it perishes moment by moment, is still able to cure illness. The light of the sun and moon, though it perishes moment by moment, is still able to cause the trees, forests, grasses, and plants to grow. Good son, you ask: if it perishes moment by moment, how, then, can it possibly grow at all? It is precisely because the mind is unbroken that this is named growth. Good son, it is like a person reciting a text: the words and phrases he recites cannot all be uttered at one and the same time — what comes first never reaches what comes in the middle, and what comes in the middle never reaches what comes at the end. Both the person himself, and the words, and even his own mental image of them, all perish moment by moment together — and yet, through long practice, he comes to master it fluently. Good son, it is like a goldsmith, who, from his very first practice all the way to his own white-haired old age, though he perishes moment by moment, and what came before never reaches what comes after, still, through accumulated practice, comes to produce work of exquisite skill, and it is for this very reason that he comes to be called a fine and skilled goldsmith — reciting and reading the scriptures is exactly the same. Good son, it is like a seed: the earth never instructs it to produce a sprout, and yet, because of its own dharma-nature, a sprout arises of itself; and, further, a flower never instructs itself to become a fruit, and yet, because of its own dharma-nature, a fruit arises of itself — a being's own cultivation of the path is exactly the same. Good son, it is like the method of counting: one never reaches two, and two never reaches three, and yet, though each perishes moment by moment, one still arrives at a thousand, at ten thousand — a being's own cultivation of the path is exactly the same. Good son, it is like a lamp that perishes moment by moment: the very flame that first perishes never instructs the flame that follows it, saying, 'As I perish, you shall arise, and shall dispel every darkness.' Good son, it is like a newborn calf, which, the very moment it is born, seeks out its mother's milk — the very intelligence that seeks this milk is, in truth, taught by no one at all, and, though it perishes moment by moment, the calf that was first hungry becomes, in the end, full and satisfied. It is for this very reason that one should know that these successive moments need not be identical to one another at all — for, were they truly identical, no different result could ever arise from them. A being's own cultivation of the path is exactly the same: though there is, at first, no apparent increase at all, through long cultivation, he becomes able to destroy every affliction entirely."

Chinese Source

師子吼言:「世尊!如佛所說,須陀洹人得果證已,雖生惡國,猶故持戒,不殺、盜、婬、兩舌、飲酒。須陀洹陰即此處滅,不至惡國。修道亦爾,不至惡國。若相似者,何故不生淨妙國土。若惡國陰非須陀洹陰,云何而得不作惡業?」佛言:「善男子!須陀洹者雖生惡國,終不失於須陀洹名,陰不相似,是故我引犢子為喻。須陀洹人雖生惡國,以道力故不作惡業。善男子!譬如香山有師子王,是故一切飛鳥走獸絕跡,此山無敢近者。有時是王至雪山中,一切鳥獸猶故不住。須陀洹人亦復如是,雖不修道,以道力故不作諸惡。善男子!譬如有人服食甘露,甘露雖滅,以其力勢能令是人不生不死。善男子!如須彌山有上妙藥名楞伽利,有人服之,雖念念滅,以藥力故不遇患苦。善男子!如轉輪王所坐之處,王雖不在,無人敢近。何以故?王威力故。須陀洹人亦復如是,雖生惡國不修習道,以道力故不作惡業。善男子!須陀洹陰於此而滅,雖生異陰,猶故不失須陀洹陰。善男子!譬如眾生為果實故,於種子中多役作業,糞治溉灌,未得果實而子復滅,亦得名為因子得果,須陀洹陰亦復如是。善男子!譬如有人資產巨富,惟有一子先已終歿,其子有子,復在他土。其人忽然奄便命終,孫聞是已還收產業,雖知財貨非其所作,然其收取無遮護者。何以故?以姓一故。須陀洹陰亦復如是。」

Ru-Yi Translation

Lion's Roar said: "World-Honored One, as the Buddha has taught, a stream-enterer, having already attained and verified this very fruit, though he be reborn in an evil land, nonetheless continues to uphold the precepts — refraining from killing, stealing, sexual misconduct, divisive speech, and drinking intoxicants. The stream-enterer's own aggregates cease right here, in this present place, and never reach that evil land at all — cultivation of the path is exactly the same, never itself reaching that evil land. If these successive aggregates are truly merely similar to one another, why, then, is he not instead reborn in some pure and wondrous land? And, if the aggregates of that evil land are truly not the stream-enterer's own aggregates at all, how, then, could he possibly refrain from performing any evil deed there?" The Buddha said: "Good son, though the stream-enterer be reborn in an evil land, he never, in the end, loses the very name of 'stream-enterer' — these successive aggregates are not identical to one another, and it is for this very reason that I have drawn upon the calf as a simile. Though the stream-enterer be reborn in an evil land, it is through the very power of the path that he refrains from performing any evil deed. Good son, it is like the fragrant mountain, upon which dwells a lion-king — it is for this very reason that every bird and beast has vanished from it entirely, and no creature dares to draw near this mountain at all. Should this very lion-king, at some time, journey to the Himalayas, every bird and beast there, likewise, still refuses to remain. The stream-enterer is exactly the same: though he does not actively cultivate the path in that place, it is through the very power of the path that he refrains from every evil deed. Good son, it is like a man who has drunk of ambrosia: though the ambrosia itself has since been digested and gone, its own power and strength are still able to cause this man to be free of birth and death. Good son, it is like the supreme medicine found upon Mount Sumeru, named laṅkālī: a man who has taken it, though it perishes moment by moment within him, is, through the power of this very medicine, no longer beset by any illness or suffering. Good son, it is like the very throne upon which a wheel-turning king once sat: though the king himself is no longer present there, no one dares to draw near it at all — why is this? Because of the king's own majestic power. The stream-enterer is exactly the same: though he be reborn in an evil land and no longer actively cultivate the path, it is through the very power of the path that he refrains from performing any evil deed. Good son, the stream-enterer's own aggregates cease right here — and, though he is reborn with a different set of aggregates, he nonetheless never loses what the stream-enterer's own aggregates had already accomplished. Good son, it is like a being who, for the sake of a fruit's harvest, expends much labor upon a seed — manuring it, tending it, and irrigating it — and, though he has not yet obtained the fruit itself, and the seed itself has since perished, one may still say that the fruit is obtained through that very seed as its cause — the stream-enterer's own aggregates are exactly the same. Good son, it is like a man of vast wealth and property who has but a single son, who has already passed away before him; this son, in turn, has his own son, who dwells in another land. Should this man suddenly, unexpectedly pass away himself, and his grandson, upon hearing of this, return to claim the family's own property — though he knows full well that this wealth was not something he himself produced, still, no one at all obstructs or prevents him from claiming it. Why is this? Because they share one and the same family line. The stream-enterer's own aggregates are exactly the same."

Reading note — Ru-Yi

The nine similes answering "how can what's always perishing still be a path" (the lamp's dispelling light, food's nourishment, a text's gradual mastery, a goldsmith's accumulated skill, a seed's spontaneous sprouting, counting's arrival at large numbers, one lamp-flame never instructing the next, a calf's untaught instinct) share a single structural point: none of them requires any single, persisting substance carried across the successive moments — a flame does not hand anything to the flame that replaces it, any more than the number "one" hands anything to "two" — and yet each still produces a real, cumulative, and irreversible result. This is the fascicle's positive answer to the puzzle the very first section of this part raised through the candle-wax seal: cultivation is possible without a self to do the cultivating, because cumulative causal shaping across a series never actually required a persisting substance in the first place, only a reliable pattern of dependency from one moment to the next.

The stream-enterer objection then tests this account against a hard case: if the aggregates cultivated here never literally reach the aggregates reborn there, in what sense does the stream-enterer's own precept-keeping travel with him into an evil land at all? The resolution — through the lion-king whose mere reputation clears a mountain he no longer occupies, the digested ambrosia whose effect outlasts the substance itself, and the grandson who inherits wealth he never personally earned — locates the answer not in any substance that persists, but in an effect, a "power," that outlives its own cause without needing to remain identical with it. This is the same move the goldsmith and reciting-student similes already made about ordinary skill; applied now to a stream-enterer's precept-keeping and, by clear extension, to a bodhisattva's own accumulated practice toward buddha-nature, it explains how genuine spiritual attainment can be real, effective, and inheritable without collapsing into the very fixed, persisting self this whole fascicle's opening question was designed to rule out.

True Cultivation of Precept, Concentration, and Wisdom

Chinese Source

師子吼言:「如佛說偈:『比丘若修習,戒定及智慧。當知是不退,親近大涅槃。』世尊,云何修戒?云何修定?云何修慧?」佛言:「善男子!若有人受持禁戒,但為自利人天受樂,不為度脫一切眾生,不為擁護無上正法,但為利養,畏三惡道,為命、色力、安、無礙辯,畏懼王法、惡名穢稱、為世事業,如是護戒則不得名修習戒也。善男子!云何名為真修習戒?受持戒時,若為度脫一切眾生為護正法,度不度故、解未解故、歸無歸故、未入涅槃令得入故,如是修時,不見戒、不見戒相、不見持者、不見果報、不觀毀犯。善男子!若能如是,是則名為修習戒也。「云何復名修習三昧?修三昧時為自度脫、為於利養,不為眾生、不為護法,為見貪欲、穢食等過,男女等根九孔不淨,鬪訟打刺、互相殺害,若為此事修三昧者,是則不名修習三昧。善男子!云何復名真修三昧?若為眾生修習三昧,於眾生中得平等心、為令眾生得不退法、為令眾生得聖心故、為令眾生得大乘故、為欲護持無上法故、為令眾生不退菩提故、為令眾生得首楞嚴故、為令眾生得金剛三昧故、為令眾生得陀羅尼故、為令眾生得四無礙故、為令眾生見佛性故,作是行時,不見三昧,不見三昧相,不見修者,不見果報。善男子!若能如是,是則名為修習三昧。「云何復名修於智慧?若有修者作是思惟:『我若修習如是智慧,則得解脫,度三惡道。誰能利益一切眾生?誰能度人於生死道?佛出世難如優曇鉢花,我今能斷諸煩惱結,必得解脫果,是故我當勤修智慧,速斷煩惱,早得度脫。』如是修者,不得名為修習智慧。云何名為真修習者?智者若觀生、老、死、苦,一切眾生無明所覆,不知修習無上正道。『願我此身悉代眾生受大苦惱,眾生所有貧窮、下賤、破戒之心,貪瞋癡業,願皆悉來集于我身。願諸眾生不生貪取,不為名色之所繫縛,願諸眾生早度生死,令我一身處之不厭,願令一切皆得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。』如是修時,不見智慧,不見智慧相,不見修者,不見果報,是則名為修習智慧。善男子!修習如是戒、定、智慧,是名菩薩。不能如是修戒定慧,是名聲聞。」

Ru-Yi Translation

Lion's Roar said: "As the Buddha has spoken in verse: 'Should a monk cultivate moral discipline, concentration, and wisdom, know that this is one who never retrogresses, drawing ever nearer to the great nirvāṇa.' World-Honored One, how, then, does one cultivate moral discipline? How does one cultivate concentration? And how does one cultivate wisdom?" The Buddha said: "Good son, should a person uphold the precepts merely for his own benefit, so as to receive happiness among gods and humans, and not for the sake of delivering every being, nor for the sake of upholding and protecting the unsurpassed true Dharma; should he uphold them merely for the sake of personal gain, out of fear of the three evil destinies, for the sake of his own life, his own beauty and strength, his own comfort, or his own unobstructed eloquence, or out of fear of the king's own law, of ill repute, or merely for the sake of worldly business — precept-keeping guarded in this way cannot be named the true cultivation of moral discipline. Good son, what, then, may be named the true cultivation of moral discipline? When one upholds the precepts for the sake of delivering every being, and for the sake of protecting the true Dharma; for the sake of those not yet delivered, that they be delivered; for the sake of those not yet liberated, that they be liberated; for the sake of those without refuge, that they gain refuge; and for the sake of those not yet entered into nirvāṇa, that they come to enter it — when one cultivates in this way, one sees no precept, no mark of the precept, no one who upholds it, and no fruit to be gained, nor does one dwell upon any transgression at all. Good son, should one be able to cultivate in exactly this way, this is then what is named the true cultivation of moral discipline. "What, then, may be named the true cultivation of samādhi? Should one cultivate samādhi merely for his own liberation, or for the sake of personal gain, and not for the sake of beings, nor for the sake of protecting the Dharma; should he cultivate it merely in order to perceive the faults of greed and desire, of impure food, of the nine impure orifices of the male and female body, or of contention, litigation, beating, stabbing, and mutual slaughter — should one cultivate samādhi for the sake of matters such as these, this cannot be named the true cultivation of samādhi. Good son, what, then, may be named the true cultivation of samādhi? Should one cultivate samādhi for the sake of beings — attaining an equal mind toward every being; causing beings to attain the dharma of non-retrogression; causing beings to attain the mind of a noble one; causing beings to attain the Great Vehicle; wishing to uphold and protect the unsurpassed Dharma; causing beings never to retrogress from bodhi; causing beings to attain the Śūraṅgama samādhi; causing beings to attain the vajra samādhi; causing beings to attain the dhāraṇīs; causing beings to attain the four unobstructed knowledges; and causing beings to see buddha-nature — when one practices in this way, one sees no samādhi, no mark of samādhi, no one who cultivates it, and no fruit to be gained. Good son, should one be able to cultivate in exactly this way, this is then what is named the true cultivation of samādhi. "What, then, may be named the true cultivation of wisdom? Should a practitioner reflect in this way: 'Should I cultivate wisdom of this kind, I shall attain liberation, and shall cross beyond the three evil destinies. Who else is able to benefit every being? Who else is able to deliver others from the path of birth-and-death? A buddha's appearance in the world is as rare as the udumbara flower — I shall now be able to sever every affliction and fetter, and shall certainly attain the fruit of liberation; it is for this very reason that I shall diligently cultivate wisdom, swiftly sever every affliction, and be delivered all the sooner' — a practitioner of this kind cannot be named one who truly cultivates wisdom. What, then, may be named one who truly cultivates it? Should the wise contemplate birth, old age, death, and suffering, and see that every being is covered over by ignorance, unable to know how to cultivate the unsurpassed true path, and thereupon vow: 'May this very body of mine take upon itself every great affliction and suffering in place of every being; may every being's own poverty, lowliness, precept-breaking mind, and every karmic action born of greed, hatred, and delusion, all come, without exception, to gather within this very body of mine instead; may every being give rise to no craving or grasping at all, and never be bound by name-and-form; may every being swiftly cross beyond birth-and-death, and may I myself dwell within it without ever tiring; and may every being, without exception, attain unsurpassed, complete awakening' — when one cultivates in this way, one sees no wisdom, no mark of wisdom, no one who cultivates it, and no fruit to be gained — this is then what is named the true cultivation of wisdom. Good son, one who cultivates moral discipline, concentration, and wisdom in exactly this way is named a bodhisattva. One who is unable to cultivate moral discipline, concentration, and wisdom in this way is named a śrāvaka."

Chinese Source

「復次善男子!云何復名修習於戒?若能破壞一切眾生十六惡律儀。何等十六?一者為利,餧養羔羊,肥已轉賣。二者為利,買已屠殺。三者為利,餧養猪豚,肥已轉賣。四者為利,買已屠殺。五者為利,餧養牛犢,肥已轉賣。六者為利,買已屠殺。七者為利,養鷄令肥,肥已轉賣。八者為利,買已屠殺。九者釣魚。十者獵師。十一者劫奪。十二者魁膾。十三者網捕飛鳥。十四者兩舌。十五者獄卒。十六者呪龍。能為眾生永斷如是十六惡業,是名修戒。云何修定?能斷一切世間三昧,所謂無身三昧,能令眾生生顛倒心謂是涅槃,有無邊心三昧、淨聚三昧、世邊三昧、世斷三昧、世性三昧、世丈夫三昧、非想非非想三昧,如是等定,能令眾生生顛倒心謂是涅槃,若能永斷如是三昧,是則名為修習三昧。云何復名修習智慧?能破世間所有惡見,一切眾生悉有惡見,所謂色即是我亦是我所。色中有我,我中有色,乃至識亦如是。常即是我,色滅我存。色即是我,色滅我滅。復有人言:『作者名我,受者名色。』復有人言:『作者名色,受者名我。』復有人言:『無作無受,自生自滅,悉非因緣。』復有人言:『無作無受,悉是自在之所造作。』復有人言:『無有作者,無有受者,一切悉是時節所作。』復有人言:『作者受者悉無所有,地等五大名為眾生。』善男子!若能破壞一切眾生如是惡見,是則名為修智慧也。「善男子!修習戒者,為身寂靜。修習三昧,為心寂靜。修習智慧,為壞疑心,壞疑心者為修習道,修習道者為見佛性,見佛性者為得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提故,得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提者為得無上大涅槃故,得大涅槃者為斷眾生一切生死、一切煩惱、一切諸有、一切諸界、一切諸諦故,斷於生死乃至斷諦,為得常、樂、我、淨法故。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"Furthermore, good son, what, further, may be named the cultivation of moral discipline? Being able to destroy, on behalf of every being, all sixteen kinds of evil livelihood. What are these sixteen? First, raising lambs for the sake of profit, fattening them, and then selling them on. Second, buying them for the sake of profit, and then slaughtering them. Third, raising pigs for the sake of profit, fattening them, and then selling them on. Fourth, buying them for the sake of profit, and then slaughtering them. Fifth, raising calves for the sake of profit, fattening them, and then selling them on. Sixth, buying them for the sake of profit, and then slaughtering them. Seventh, raising chickens for the sake of profit, fattening them, and then selling them on. Eighth, buying them for the sake of profit, and then slaughtering them. Ninth, fishing. Tenth, hunting. Eleventh, robbery and plunder. Twelfth, serving as an executioner. Thirteenth, netting birds. Fourteenth, divisive speech. Fifteenth, serving as a prison guard. Sixteenth, casting spells upon nāgas. Being able, on behalf of every being, to forever sever these sixteen evil deeds is named the cultivation of moral discipline. How, then, does one cultivate concentration? Being able to sever every worldly samādhi — namely, the bodiless samādhi, which is able to cause beings to give rise to the inverted thought that this is itself nirvāṇa; the boundless-mind samādhi; the pure-aggregation samādhi; the world's-edge samādhi; the world's-severance samādhi; the world's-own-nature samādhi; the world's-great-person samādhi; and the samādhi of neither-perception-nor-non-perception — concentrations of exactly this kind are able to cause beings to give rise to the inverted thought that this is itself nirvāṇa; should one be able to forever sever samādhis of this kind, this is then what is named the cultivation of samādhi. How, then, may this be named the cultivation of wisdom? Being able to destroy every wrong view found in the world. Every being, without exception, holds some wrong view — namely, that form is itself the self, and also belongs to the self; that the self is present within form, and form is present within the self; and, further, that consciousness is exactly the same. That the permanent is itself the self, and, though form perishes, the self remains. That form is itself the self, and, when form perishes, the self, too, perishes. There is, further, one who says: 'The doer is named the self, and what is experienced is named form.' There is, further, one who says: 'The doer is named form, and what experiences is named the self.' There is, further, one who says: 'There is no doer and no experiencer at all — everything arises of itself and perishes of itself, entirely without cause or condition.' There is, further, one who says: 'There is no doer and no experiencer at all — everything is, without exception, brought about by a sovereign, independent power.' There is, further, one who says: 'There is no doer at all, and no experiencer at all — everything, without exception, is brought about by the mere passage of time.' There is, further, one who says: 'Neither the doer nor the experiencer exists at all — the five great elements, earth and the rest, are what is named a being.' Good son, should one be able to destroy every such wrong view, on behalf of every being, this is then what is named the cultivation of wisdom. "Good son, the cultivation of moral discipline is for the sake of tranquility of body. The cultivation of samādhi is for the sake of tranquility of mind. The cultivation of wisdom is for the sake of destroying a doubting mind; the destruction of a doubting mind is for the sake of cultivating the path; the cultivation of the path is for the sake of seeing buddha-nature; the seeing of buddha-nature is for the sake of attaining unsurpassed, complete awakening; the attainment of unsurpassed, complete awakening is for the sake of attaining the unsurpassed great nirvāṇa; and the attainment of the great nirvāṇa is for the sake of severing every being's own birth-and-death, every affliction, every state of existence, every realm, and every truth entirely — and the severing of birth-and-death, all the way through to the severing of every truth, is for the sake of attaining the dharma of permanence, bliss, self, and purity."

Reading note — Ru-Yi

The first pass through precept, concentration, and wisdom draws the bodhisattva/śrāvaka line entirely on intention and on a shared closing formula — "sees no [precept/samādhi/wisdom], no mark of it, no one who practices it, no fruit to be gained" — making the genuinely decisive factor not what is practiced but whether the practice is performed for every being's liberation or only one's own, and whether it is performed without the subtle self-congratulation of watching oneself practice. The bodhisattva's wisdom-vow in particular (offering to personally absorb every being's poverty, precept-breaking, and affliction) reads as this fascicle's own culmination of the substitution-logic threaded through Parts 23 and 26's "hard to do, hard to endure, hard to give" heroic virtues, now folded into the definition of wisdom itself rather than treated as a separate practice.

The second pass then grounds the same three headings in concrete, specifiable content rather than intention alone: the sixteen evil livelihoods name entire categories of trade built on raising creatures only to profit from their slaughter (the fatten-then-sell, buy-then-slaughter pattern repeated four times across lambs, pigs, calves, and chickens is itself a small, damning taxonomy of the livestock economy); the list of wrong samādhis catalogues meditative states genuinely capable of producing profound absorption yet still mistaken for nirvāṇa itself; and the list of wrong views on self and form catalogues nearly every logically possible relation a philosopher could propose between self, aggregates, and agency (self as form, form as vehicle for self, self as agent, form as agent, no agent at all, time as sole cause, and so on) — read together, this second pass shows that "true cultivation" is not a purely private, motivational achievement but also requires actually getting the ethical and philosophical content right, closing with the fifteen-step chain (precept → concentration → wisdom → freedom from doubt → the path → buddha-nature → awakening → nirvāṇa → severing of birth-and-death) that ties this section's entire discussion back to the fascicle's own opening question about what, exactly, cultivation accomplishes.

Why Isn't Saṃsāra Also Nirvāṇa?

Chinese Source

師子吼言:「世尊!如佛所說,若不生不滅名大涅槃者,生亦如是不生不滅,何故不得名為涅槃。」「善男子!如是,如是。如汝所言。是生雖復不生不滅,而有始終。」「世尊!是生死法亦無始終,若無始終則名為常,常即涅槃,何故不名生死為涅槃耶?」「善男子!是生死法悉有因果,有因果故,不得名之為涅槃也。何以故?涅槃之體無因果故。」師子吼言:「世尊!夫涅槃者亦有因果。如佛所說:『從因故生天,從因墮惡道。從因故涅槃,是故皆有因。』如佛往昔告諸比丘:『我今當說沙門道果。言沙門者,謂能具修戒、定、智慧。道者謂八聖道,沙門果者所謂涅槃。』世尊!涅槃如是,豈非果耶?云何說言涅槃之體無因無果?」佛言:「善男子!我所宣說涅槃因者,所謂佛性,佛性之性不生涅槃,是故我言涅槃無因。能破煩惱故名大果,不從道生故名無果,是故涅槃無因無果。」

Ru-Yi Translation

Lion's Roar said: "World-Honored One, as the Buddha has taught, if the great nirvāṇa is named for being unborn and unceasing, then birth-and-death, too, is exactly the same, unborn and unceasing — why, then, can it not also be named nirvāṇa?" "Good son, this is so, this is so, exactly as you have said. This very birth, though it is, in this sense, unborn and unceasing, nonetheless has a beginning and an end." "World-Honored One, this dharma of birth-and-death, too, has no beginning and no end — and, if it has no beginning and no end, it should be named permanent, and, being permanent, it is thereby nirvāṇa — why, then, can birth-and-death not also be named nirvāṇa?" "Good son, this dharma of birth-and-death, without exception, possesses cause and fruit — and, because it possesses cause and fruit, it cannot be named nirvāṇa at all. Why is this? Because the very essence of nirvāṇa is without cause or fruit." Lion's Roar said: "World-Honored One, nirvāṇa, too, has both cause and fruit. As the Buddha himself has taught: 'From a cause, one is born among the gods; from a cause, one falls into an evil destiny. From a cause, one attains nirvāṇa — it is for this very reason that everything, without exception, has a cause.' And, as the Buddha has, in ages past, told the monks: 'I shall now speak of the fruit of the śramaṇa's own path. A śramaṇa is one who is able to fully cultivate moral discipline, concentration, and wisdom. The path is the eightfold noble path, and the fruit of the śramaṇa is nirvāṇa itself.' World-Honored One, if nirvāṇa is exactly this, how could it not be a fruit? How, then, can it be said that the very essence of nirvāṇa is without cause and without fruit?" The Buddha said: "Good son, the cause of nirvāṇa that I proclaim is none other than buddha-nature — and the nature of buddha-nature itself does not produce nirvāṇa, and it is for this very reason that I say nirvāṇa is without cause. Because it is able to destroy affliction, it is named a great fruit; and, because it is not produced by the path itself, it is named without fruit — it is for this very reason that nirvāṇa is both without cause and without fruit."

Chinese Source

師子吼言:「世尊!眾生佛性為悉共有?為各各有?若共有者,一人得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提時,一切眾生亦應同得。世尊!如二十人同有一怨,若一人能除,餘十九人皆亦同除。佛性亦爾,一人得時,餘亦應得。若各各有則是無常。何以故?可算數故。然佛所說眾生佛性不一、不二,若各各有,不應說言諸佛平等,亦不應說佛性如空。」佛言:「善男子!眾生佛性,不一不二,諸佛平等猶如虛空,一切眾生同共有之。若有能修八聖道者,當知是人則得明見。善男子!雪山有草名曰忍辱,牛若食之則成醍醐,眾生佛性亦復如是。」師子吼言:「如佛所說,忍辱草者,一耶?多耶?如其一者,牛食則盡。如其多者,云何而言眾生佛性亦如是耶?如佛所說,若有修習八聖道者,則見佛性,是義不然。何以故?道若一者,如忍辱草,則應有盡,如其有盡,一人修已,餘則無分。若道多者,云何得言具足修習,亦不得名薩婆若智?」

Ru-Yi Translation

Lion's Roar said: "World-Honored One, is a being's own buddha-nature something possessed in common by all, or something possessed individually by each? Should it be possessed in common, then, at the very moment one person attains unsurpassed, complete awakening, every being, without exception, ought likewise to attain it at the very same time. World-Honored One, it is like twenty men who share one and the same enemy: should one of them be able to remove this enemy, the remaining nineteen would, likewise, all have him removed at once. Buddha-nature is exactly the same — at the moment one person attains it, every other person, too, ought to attain it. And, should it instead be possessed individually by each, it would then be impermanent — why is this? Because it could then be counted and numbered. And yet the Buddha has taught that a being's own buddha-nature is neither one nor two — should it truly be possessed individually by each, one could then no longer say that every buddha is equal to every other, nor could one say that buddha-nature is like empty space." The Buddha said: "Good son, a being's own buddha-nature is neither one nor two: every buddha is equal, exactly like empty space, and every being, without exception, possesses this very same buddha-nature in common. Should one be able to cultivate the eightfold noble path, know that this person then attains a clear seeing of it. Good son, upon the Himalayas there grows a grass named forbearance — should a cow eat it, it becomes ghee; a being's own buddha-nature is exactly the same." Lion's Roar said: "As the Buddha has taught, is this grass of forbearance one single grass, or many? If it is a single grass, once a cow has eaten it, it would then be entirely gone. And, if it is many, how, then, can it be said that a being's own buddha-nature is exactly the same? As the Buddha has taught, should one cultivate the eightfold noble path, one thereby sees buddha-nature — this, I think, is not correct. Why is this? If the path is a single thing, then, like the grass of forbearance, it ought to become entirely exhausted — and, should it truly become exhausted, then, once one person has cultivated it, no portion at all would remain for anyone else. And, if the path is instead many things, how, then, can it be said that one 'fully' cultivates it, and how, then, could it possibly be named omniscient wisdom at all?"

Chinese Source

佛言:「善男子!如平坦路,一切眾生悉於中行無障礙者。中路有樹其陰清涼,行人在下憩駕止息,然其樹陰常住不移,亦不消壞,無持去者。路喻聖道,陰喻佛性。善男子!譬如大城,唯有一門,雖有多人經由入出,都無有能作障礙者,亦復無人破壞毀落而齎持去。善男子!譬如橋梁行人所由,亦無有人遮止障礙毀壞持去。善男子!譬如良醫遍療眾病,亦無有能遮止是醫治此捨彼,聖道佛性亦復如是。」師子吼言:「世尊!所引諸喻,義不如是。何以故?先者在路,於後則妨,云何而言無有障礙?餘亦皆爾。聖道佛性若如是者,一人修時,應妨餘者。」佛言:「善男子!如汝所言,義不相應。我所喻道,是少分喻,非一切也。善男子!世間道者則有障礙,此彼之異,無有平等。無漏道者則不如是,能令眾生無有障礙,平等無二,無有方處此彼之異,如是正道,能為一切眾生佛性而作了因,不作生因。猶如明燈,照了於物。善男子!一切眾生皆同無明,因緣於行,不可說言一人無明,因緣行已,其餘應無。一切眾生悉有無明,因緣於行,是故說言十二因緣一切平等。眾生所修無漏正道,亦復如是,等斷眾生煩惱、四生、諸界、有道,以是義故,名為平等。其有證者,彼此知見,無有障礙,是故得名薩婆若智。」師子吼言:「一切眾生,身不一種,或有天身、或有人身、畜生、餓鬼、地獄之身,如是多身差別非一,云何而言佛性為一?」佛言:「善男子!譬如有人置毒乳中,乃至醍醐皆悉有毒,乳不名酪,酪不名乳,乃至醍醐亦復如是。名字雖變,毒性不失,遍五味中,皆悉如是,若服醍醐亦能殺人,實不置毒於醍醐中。眾生佛性亦復如是,雖處五道,受別異身,而是佛性常一無變。」

Ru-Yi Translation

The Buddha said: "Good son, it is like a level, even road, upon which every being, without exception, is able to walk entirely without obstruction. Along the middle of this road stands a tree, whose shade is cool and refreshing — travelers rest beneath it, unharnessing their carts and pausing there — and yet this very shade remains forever unmoved, never diminishing, and no one at all is able to carry it away with him. The road is a likeness for the noble path; the shade is a likeness for buddha-nature. Good son, it is like a great city with but a single gate: though many people pass in and out through it, no one at all is ever obstructed by another, nor does anyone break it down, damage it, or carry it away with him. Good son, it is like a bridge, which every traveler passes over, and yet no one at all obstructs, damages, or carries it away. Good son, it is like a skilled physician who treats every kind of illness everywhere, and yet no one at all is able to prevent him from treating this patient while abandoning that one — the noble path and buddha-nature are exactly the same." Lion's Roar said: "World-Honored One, the similes you have drawn upon do not, I think, hold in this way. Why is this? Whoever is first upon the road obstructs whoever comes after him — how, then, can it be said that there is no obstruction at all? And every other simile, likewise, has this same problem. If the noble path and buddha-nature are truly like this, then, at the moment one person cultivates it, this ought to obstruct everyone else." The Buddha said: "Good son, as you have said, this does not, in fact, correspond correctly at all. The road I offered as a simile was meant to convey only a small portion of the meaning, not the whole of it. Good son, a worldly road indeed has obstruction, and a difference between this place and that, without any equality at all. The undefiled path is not like this at all — it is able to cause every being to be entirely without obstruction, equal and without duality, without any distinction of place, of this or that. A true path of exactly this kind is able to serve, for every being's own buddha-nature, as its revealing cause, not as its generative cause — exactly like a bright lamp, which reveals an object without producing it. Good son, every being, without exception, is equally subject to ignorance, which conditions volitional formations — one cannot say that, because one person's ignorance has already conditioned his own formations, no ignorance at all remains for anyone else. Every being, without exception, possesses ignorance, which conditions his own formations — it is for this very reason that I say the twelve links of dependent origination are, for every being, entirely equal. The undefiled, true path that a being cultivates is exactly the same, equally severing every being's own affliction, the four modes of birth, every realm, and every state of existence — it is for this very reason that it is named equal. Whoever attains realization of it, his own knowledge and vision, and every other's, are without any obstruction between them at all — it is for this very reason that this may be named omniscient wisdom." Lion's Roar said: "Every being's own body is not of a single kind — there is the body of a god, the body of a human, and the bodies of animals, hungry ghosts, and hell-beings — bodies of so many different kinds, each entirely distinct from the others — how, then, can it be said that buddha-nature is a single thing?" The Buddha said: "Good son, it is like a man who places poison into milk: all the way through to the ghee it eventually becomes, every stage contains this very poison. Milk is not named curd, and curd is not named milk, and this holds, too, all the way through to ghee — though the name changes at every stage, the poison's own nature is never lost, and this holds true throughout all five flavors alike; should one drink even the ghee, it, too, is still able to kill a man, though, in truth, no poison was ever separately placed into the ghee itself. A being's own buddha-nature is exactly the same: though it passes through the five destinies, receiving one distinct body after another, this very buddha-nature remains forever one and unchanging."

Reading note — after Huiyuan

Huiyuan reads the saṃsāra-nirvāṇa exchange as turning on a distinction easy to miss: both are, in a sense, "unborn and unceasing," yet birth-and-death still has a beginning and an end for any given being (it starts, and it stops, upon liberation), while nirvāṇa's own essence has neither — and the deeper reason birth-and-death cannot be named nirvāṇa is that it possesses cause and fruit (karmic causation running all the way through), while nirvāṇa's own essence has neither, its "cause" (buddha-nature) not itself producing it and its status as "fruit" being only the destruction of affliction, not a further conditioned production. This restates, in more technical language, the distinction Part 28 drew between the impermanent bodhi-mind and buddha-nature proper: what has cause and fruit running through it in the ordinary sense is thereby marked as belonging to saṃsāra's own causal order, however permanent-seeming it looks from outside.

On the shared/individual buddha-nature debate, Huiyuan reads the Buddha's answer as asserting a middle position the sūtra states but does not immediately defend — "neither one nor two" — and then reads the whole remainder of the passage as the working-out of exactly how this is possible: the herb of forbearance, unlike a countable, exhaustible object, stands for something that is not used up by being "eaten," which Lion's Roar rightly presses by asking whether the noble path itself, likewise said to be single, gets exhausted once one person walks it. The Buddha's road-and-shade, gate, bridge, and physician similes are, on Huiyuan's reading, each partial illustrations of non-exhaustive sharing, honestly conceded to be imperfect the moment Lion's Roar points out that an ordinary road does, in fact, produce real congestion — the decisive correction being the shift from generative cause to revealing cause: the path does not produce buddha-nature the way each traveler's passage would use up a shared resource, but merely reveals what was already, non-competitively, present in each being, exactly as the twelve links of dependent origination are said to apply "equally" to every being without one being's ignorance depleting anyone else's share of it. The poison-in-milk simile closing the debate then answers Lion's Roar's final objection (many kinds of bodies, one buddha-nature) the same way the milk-curd debate resolved presence-through-transformation in the previous fascicle: a single underlying property can persist unchanged through every change of name and form the five flavors undergo, exactly as buddha-nature persists, one and unvarying, through birth after birth in different bodies and destinies.

Why Kuśinagara?

Chinese Source

師子吼言:「世尊!十六大國,有六大城。所謂舍婆提城、婆枳多城、瞻婆城、毘舍離城、波羅㮏城、王舍城,如是六城世中最大。何故如來捨之,在此邊地弊惡,極陋隘小拘尸那城入般涅槃?」「善男子!汝不應言拘尸那城邊地弊惡、最陋隘小,應言是城,微妙功德之所莊嚴。何以故?諸佛菩薩所行處故。善男子!如賤人舍,王若過者則應讚歎,是舍嚴麗功德成就,能令大王迴駕臨顧。善男子!如人重病,服穢弊藥,服已病愈,即應歡喜讚歎,是藥最上最妙,能愈我病。善男子!如人乘船在大海中,其船卒壞無所依倚,因倚死屍得到彼岸,到彼岸已,應大歡喜讚歎,是屍我賴相遇而得安隱。拘尸那城亦復如是,乃是諸佛菩薩行處,云何而言邊地弊惡陋隘小城?」

Ru-Yi Translation

Lion's Roar said: "World-Honored One, among the sixteen great kingdoms, there are six great cities — namely, the cities of Śrāvastī, Sāketa, Campā, Vaiśālī, Vārāṇasī, and Rājagṛha — these six cities are the greatest in the world. Why, then, has the Tathāgata forsaken them all, to enter parinirvāṇa in this remote, wretched, most cramped and narrow little city of Kuśinagara instead?" "Good son, you ought not to say that the city of Kuśinagara is a remote, wretched, most cramped and narrow little city at all — you ought instead to say that this very city is adorned with subtle and wondrous merit. Why is this? Because it is a place where every buddha and bodhisattva has walked. Good son, it is like the dwelling of a lowly person: should a king happen to pass by it, he ought instead to praise it, saying that this dwelling is itself adorned with fine and beautiful merit, able to cause a great king to turn his own carriage aside and pay it a visit. Good son, it is like a man gravely ill, who takes some foul and unpleasant medicine, and, having taken it, is cured of his illness — he ought then to rejoice and praise it, saying that this medicine is the very finest and most wondrous, able to cure his own sickness. Good son, it is like a man riding a boat upon the great ocean, whose boat suddenly breaks apart, leaving him with nothing at all to cling to — and, relying upon a floating corpse, he manages to reach the far shore; having reached that shore, he ought to rejoice greatly and praise it, saying: it is thanks to this very corpse, which I happened to meet, that I have found safety. The city of Kuśinagara is exactly the same — it is, after all, a place where every buddha and bodhisattva has walked — how, then, could one call it a remote, wretched, cramped, and narrow little city?"

Chinese Source

「善男子!我念往昔過恒河沙劫,劫名善覺,時有聖王姓憍尸迦,七寶成就,千子具足。其王始初造立此城,周匝縱廣十二由延,七寶莊嚴,土多有河,其水清淨柔軟甘美,所謂尼連禪河、伊羅跋提河、熙連禪河、伊搜末塠河、毘婆舍那河,如是等河其數五百。河此彼岸樹木繁茂、花果鮮潔。爾時人民壽命無量。時轉輪聖王過百年已,作是唱言:『如佛所說,一切諸法皆悉無常。若能修習十善法者,能斷如是無常大苦。』人民聞已,咸共奉修十善之法。我於爾時聞佛名號,受持十善,思惟修習,初發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心。發是心已,復以是法,轉教無量無邊眾生,言一切法無常變壞。是故我今續於此處,亦說諸法無常變壞,惟說佛身是常住法。我憶往昔所行因緣,是故今來在此涅槃,亦欲酬報此地往恩。以是義故,我經中說,我眷屬者受恩能報。「復次善男子!往昔眾生壽無量時,爾時此城名拘舍跋提,周匝縱廣五十由延,時閻浮提居民隣接,鷄飛相及。有轉輪王名曰善見,七寶成就,千子具足,王四天下。第一太子思惟正法得辟支佛。時轉輪王見其太子成辟支佛,威儀庠序,神通希有。見是事已,即捨王位,如棄涕唾,出家在此娑羅樹間,八萬歲中修習慈心,悲、喜、捨心各八萬歲。善男子!欲知爾時善見聖王,則我身是。是故我今常樂遊止如是四法,是四法者名為三昧。以是義故,如來之身常樂我淨。善男子!以是因緣,今來在此拘尸那城娑羅樹間,三昧正受。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"Good son, I recall that, in ages past, beyond kalpas as numerous as the sands of the Ganges, there was a kalpa named Well-Awakened, in which there lived a sage-king of the Kauśika lineage, endowed with the seven treasures, and possessed of a thousand sons. This king was the very one who first founded and built this city — encircling it, twelve yojanas in breadth, adorned with the seven treasures, its land rich with rivers whose waters were pure, gentle, and sweet — namely, the Nairañjanā River, the Airāvatī River, the Hiraṇyavatī River, the Iṣumatī River, and the Vipaśyanā River, and five hundred rivers besides. Along both banks of these rivers, the trees grew lush and abundant, their flowers and fruit fresh and pure. At that time, the people's own lifespans were immeasurable. When this wheel-turning sage-king had passed a hundred years upon his throne, he made this very proclamation: 'As the Buddha has taught, every dharma, without exception, is impermanent. Should one be able to cultivate the ten wholesome deeds, one is thereby able to sever this very great suffering of impermanence.' Upon hearing this, the people, one and all, together undertook the cultivation of these ten wholesome deeds. I, at that very time, heard the Buddha's own name, upheld the ten wholesome deeds, and, through contemplation and cultivation, first gave rise to the mind of unsurpassed, complete awakening. Having given rise to this mind, I further took up this very teaching and, in turn, taught it to immeasurable, boundless beings, proclaiming that every dharma is impermanent and subject to change and decay. It is for this very reason that I now, in this very place, continue to teach that every dharma is impermanent and subject to change and decay, while teaching solely that the Buddha's own body is an ever-abiding dharma. I recall the causes and conditions of my own past deeds, and it is for this very reason that I have now come to this very place to enter nirvāṇa, wishing also to repay this land's own kindness shown to me long ago. It is for this very reason that, within my own scriptures, I teach that my own followers are those who, having received kindness, are able to repay it. "Furthermore, good son, in ages past, at a time when beings had immeasurable lifespans, this very city was named Kuśāvatī, encircling it, fifty yojanas in breadth — at that time, the inhabitants of Jambudvīpa dwelt so closely together that a chicken could fly from one dwelling to the next without pause. There was, at that time, a wheel-turning king named Sudarśana, endowed with the seven treasures, possessed of a thousand sons, and sovereign over the four continents. His very first crown prince, through contemplating the true Dharma, attained the state of a pratyekabuddha. Seeing his own crown prince become a pratyekabuddha, his bearing composed and dignified, his supernatural powers rare and wondrous, the wheel-turning king, upon witnessing this, at once cast aside his own throne, as one casts aside spittle, and became a renunciant right here among these very sāla trees, cultivating the mind of loving-kindness for eighty thousand years, and the minds of compassion, sympathetic joy, and equanimity, likewise, for eighty thousand years each. Good son, should you wish to know who this King Sudarśana was at that time — it was none other than myself. It is for this very reason that I have forever delighted in dwelling within these very four dharmas, and these four dharmas are themselves named samādhi. It is for this very reason that the Tathāgata's own body possesses permanence, bliss, self, and purity. Good son, it is through this very cause and condition that I have now come to this very city of Kuśinagara, among these very sāla trees, to enter proper absorption in samādhi."

Chinese Source

「善男子!我念往昔過無量劫,此城爾時名迦毘羅衛,其城有王,名曰白淨,其王夫人名曰摩耶,王有一子名悉達多。爾時王子不由師教,自然思惟得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。有二弟子:一名舍利弗,二名大目犍連;給侍弟子名曰阿難。爾時世尊,在雙樹間演說如是大涅槃經。我時在會,得預斯事,聞諸眾生悉有佛性。聞是事已,即於菩提得不退轉,尋自發願:『願未來世成佛之時,父母國土、名字弟子、侍使之人說法教化,如今世尊等無有異。』以是因緣,今來在此敷揚演說大涅槃經。「善男子,我初出家未得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提時,頻婆娑羅王遣使而言:『悉達太子若為聖王,我當臣屬。若不樂家,得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提者,願先來至此王舍城說法度人,受我供養。』我時默然已受彼請。善男子!我初得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提已,向竭闍國時,伊連禪河有婆羅門姓迦葉氏,與五百弟子在彼河側,求無上道,我為是人故往說法。迦葉言:『瞿曇!我今年邁已百二十,摩伽陀國所有人民及其大王頻婆娑羅,咸謂我已證羅漢果。我今若當在於汝前聽受法者,一切人民或生倒心,大德迦葉非羅漢耶。幸願瞿曇速往餘處,若此人民定知瞿曇功德勝我,我等無由復得供養。』我時答言:『迦葉!汝若於我不生殷重大瞋恨者,見容一宿,明當早去。』迦葉言:『瞿曇!我心無他,深相愛重。但我住處有一毒龍,其性暴急,恐相危害。』我言:『迦葉!毒中之毒,不過三毒,我今已斷。世間之毒,我所不畏。』迦葉復言:『苟能不畏,善哉,聽住。』善男子!我於爾時故為迦葉現十八變,如經中說。爾時迦葉及其眷屬五百等輩,見聞是已,證羅漢果。是時迦葉復有二弟:一名伽耶迦葉,二名那提迦葉,師徒眷屬復有五百,亦皆證得阿羅漢果。時王舍城六師之徒,聞是事已,即於我所生大惡心。我時赴信受彼王請詣王舍城,未至中路,王與無量百千之眾悉來奉迎,我為說法。時聞法已,欲界諸天八萬六千,發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心,頻婆娑羅王所將營從十二萬人得須陀洹果,無量眾生成就忍心。既入城已,度舍利弗、大目犍連及其眷屬二百五十人,令捨本心出家學道,我即住彼受王供養。外道六師相與聚集,詣舍衛城。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"Good son, I recall that, in ages past, beyond immeasurable kalpas, this very city was named Kapilavastu. This city had a king, named Śuddhodana, whose queen was named Māyā, and this king had a single son, named Siddhārtha. At that time, this prince, without relying upon any teacher's instruction, through his own natural contemplation, attained unsurpassed, complete awakening. He had two disciples — one named Śāriputra, and the other named Mahāmaudgalyāyana — and an attendant disciple named Ānanda. At that time, this world-honored one, among these very twin trees, proclaimed this very Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra. I, at that time, was present within that very assembly, and was able to take part in this very event, hearing that every being, without exception, possesses buddha-nature. Upon hearing this, I at once attained non-retrogression with respect to bodhi, and thereupon gave rise, of my own accord, to this very vow: 'May I, too, in a future age, at the time I become a buddha, have parents, a homeland, a name, disciples, and attendants, and teach and transform beings through my own teaching, exactly as this very world-honored one now does, without any difference at all.' It is through this very cause and condition that I have now come to this very place to expound and proclaim this very Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra. "Good son, when I had first become a renunciant, before I had yet attained unsurpassed, complete awakening, King Bimbisāra sent a messenger, saying: 'Should Prince Siddhārtha choose to become a sage-king, I shall gladly become his subject. And, should he instead take no delight in the household life, and attain unsurpassed, complete awakening, I ask only that he come first to this very city of Rājagṛha to teach the Dharma and deliver its people, and receive my own offerings.' I, at that time, silently accepted this very invitation. Good son, once I had first attained unsurpassed, complete awakening, and was journeying toward the kingdom of Gayā, there was, beside the Nairañjanā River, a brahmin of the Kāśyapa clan, dwelling there together with five hundred disciples along that riverbank, seeking the unsurpassed path — and it was for the sake of this very man that I went there to teach the Dharma. This Kāśyapa said to me: 'Gautama, I am now already one hundred and twenty years of age — the people of the kingdom of Magadha, and its great king, Bimbisāra himself, all take me to have already attained the fruit of arhatship. Should I now sit before you and receive your teaching, the people, one and all, might well give rise to a doubting thought, wondering: is the venerable Kāśyapa perhaps not truly an arhat after all? I beg you, Gautama, to go swiftly elsewhere — for, should these people come to know for certain that your own merit surpasses my own, we shall have no way at all to continue receiving their offerings.' I then answered him, saying: 'Kāśyapa, if you do not harbor any deep or grave resentment toward me, allow me to stay but a single night, and I shall depart early the following morning.' Kāśyapa said: 'Gautama, my own mind holds nothing else at all — I regard you only with deep affection and respect. It is only that, at my own dwelling place, there lives a venomous dragon, fierce and violent by nature, and I fear it might do you harm.' I said: 'Kāśyapa, of every kind of poison there is, none surpasses the three poisons — and these I have already severed entirely. I hold no fear at all of any poison found in this world.' Kāśyapa then said: 'Since you truly hold no fear of it, excellent — I permit you to stay.' Good son, I, at that time, deliberately manifested, for Kāśyapa's own sake, the eighteen transformations, exactly as is told within the scriptures. At that time, Kāśyapa, together with his own five hundred followers, upon seeing and hearing this, attained the fruit of arhatship. This same Kāśyapa had, further, two younger brothers — one named Gayā Kāśyapa, and the other named Nadī Kāśyapa — and their own teachers, disciples, and followers, five hundred in number besides, likewise all attained the fruit of arhatship. At that time, the followers of the six heterodox teachers in Rājagṛha, upon hearing of this, at once gave rise to great malice toward me. I, at that time, in response to King Bimbisāra's own faithful invitation, set out for the city of Rājagṛha, and, before I had even reached the midpoint of the road, the king, together with an immeasurable multitude numbering in the hundreds of thousands, came out to receive me, and I taught the Dharma for them. Upon hearing this teaching, eighty-six thousand gods of the desire realm gave rise to the mind of unsurpassed, complete awakening; a hundred and twenty thousand of King Bimbisāra's own retinue and attendants attained the fruit of stream-entry; and immeasurable beings attained the mind of forbearance. Having entered the city, I delivered Śāriputra and Mahāmaudgalyāyana, together with their own two hundred and fifty followers, causing them to cast aside their former beliefs and become renunciants in pursuit of the path, and I then dwelt there, receiving the king's own offerings. The followers of the six heterodox teachers, gathering together, then made their way to the city of Śrāvastī."

Reading note — after Huiyuan

Huiyuan reads Lion's Roar's question here as carrying three distinct edges at once — why leave the six great cities at all, why choose to enter nirvāṇa here specifically, and why this particular wretched place — and reads the Buddha's threefold counter-simile (the lowly dwelling a king visits, the foul medicine that cures, the corpse that saves a drowning man) as together making a single point: worth is established by function and by what actually occurs there, not by a place's own outward appearance, so that Kuśinagara's humility is simply irrelevant to the question of its merit once "every buddha and bodhisattva has walked here" is granted as the actual standard. On his reading, the string of past-life narratives that follows is not merely decorative biography but the positive argument this negative point was clearing space for: the site's own merit is not asserted in the abstract but demonstrated through an accumulating chain of concrete precedent, stretching back through kalpa after kalpa, each story adding a further layer of reason this exact location was, in fact, already sacred long before this final visit.

Sudatta and the Garden of Gold

Chinese Source

◎時彼城中有一長者名須達多,為兒娉婦詣王舍城,既達彼城,寄止長者珊檀那舍。時此長者中夜而起告諸眷屬:『仁等可起,速共莊嚴、掃治宅舍、辦具餚饍。』須達聞已,尋自思惟:『將非欲請摩伽王耶?為有婚姻歡樂會乎?』思惟是已,尋前問言:『大士!欲請摩伽陀王頻婆娑羅耶?為有婚姻歡樂會乎?遽務不安乃如是耶?』長者答言:『不也,居士!我明請佛無上法王。』須達長者初聞佛名,身毛皆竪,尋復問言:『何等名佛?』長者答言:『汝不聞耶?迦毘羅城有釋種子,字悉達多,姓瞿曇氏,父名白淨。其生未久,相師占之,定當得作轉輪聖王,如菴羅果已在手中。心不願樂捨之出家,無師自覺,得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,貪恚癡盡。常住無變,不生不滅,無有憂畏。於諸眾生,其心平等,猶如父母等視一子。所有身心眾中最勝,雖勝一切而無憍慢,塗割二事其心無二。智慧通達於法無礙,具足十力、四無所畏、五智三昧、大慈大悲及三念處,故號為佛。明受我請,是故怱怱未暇相瞻。』須達多言:『善哉,大士!所言佛者,功德無上,今在何處?』長者答言:『今在此間王舍大城,住迦蘭陀竹林精舍。』時須達多一心念佛所有功德,十力、無畏、五智三昧、大慈大悲及三念處,作是念時,忽然大明,其明猛盛,猶如白日,即尋光出,至城門下。佛神力故,門自開闢。既出門已,路有天祠,須達經過禮拜致敬,尋還黑闇。心生惶怖,復欲還返所止之處,時彼城門有一天神,告須達言:『仁者若往如來所者,多獲善利。』須達多言:『云何善利?』答言:『長者!假使有人真寶珓珞、駿馬百匹、香象百頭、寶車百乘,鑄金為人其數復百,端正女人身珮瓔珞、眾寶廁填,上妙宮宅、殿堂屋宇、雕文刻鏤,金盤銀粟、銀盤金粟,數各一百,以施一人,如是展轉盡閻浮提,所得功德,不如有人發意一步,詣如來所。』須達多言:『善男子!汝是誰耶?』答言:『長者!我是勝相婆羅門子,是汝往昔善知識也。我因往日見舍利弗、大目犍連,心生歡喜,捨身得作北方天王毘沙門子,專知守護此王舍城。我因禮拜舍利弗等,生歡喜心,尚得如是妙好之身,況當得見如來大師,禮拜供養?』須達長者聞是事已,即還復道來詣我所。到已頭面敬禮我足,我時即為如應說法。長者聞已得須陀洹果,既獲果證,復請我言:『如來大慈,惟願臨顧至舍衛城,受我微供。』我即問言:『卿舍衛國,頗有精舍,相容受不?』須達多言:『若佛哀愍,必見垂顧,便當自竭營辦成立。』善男子!我於爾時默然受請。須達長者已蒙聽許,即白我言:『我從昔來未為斯事,惟願如來,遣舍利弗指授儀則,我即顧命勅令營佐。』

Ru-Yi Translation

"At that time, within that city, there was an elder named Sudatta who, having come to Rājagṛha to arrange his son's marriage, upon reaching that city, lodged at the house of the elder Śāṇḍanya. At the middle of that very night, this elder rose and said to his own household: 'Rise, all of you — quickly adorn and sweep clean the house, and prepare a fine feast.' Sudatta, hearing this, at once reflected to himself: 'Could it be that he intends to invite King Bimbisāra? Or is there some joyous marriage-feast to be held?' Having reflected in this way, he stepped forward and asked: 'Great one, do you intend to invite King Bimbisāra of Magadha? Or is there some joyous marriage-feast to be held? Why else would you be so urgently and anxiously occupied like this?' The elder answered: 'Neither, householder — tomorrow, I shall invite the Buddha, the unsurpassed Dharma-king.' Upon first hearing the name 'Buddha,' the elder Sudatta's every hair stood on end, and he at once asked further: 'What, exactly, is meant by "Buddha"?' The elder answered: 'Have you not heard? In the city of Kapilavastu, there is a son of the Śākya clan, named Siddhārtha, of the Gautama lineage, whose father is named Śuddhodana. Not long after his birth, a physiognomist examined him and declared that he was certain to become a wheel-turning sage-king, as surely as an amra fruit already resting in one's own hand. Yet his own heart took no delight in this, and he cast it aside to become a renunciant, and, without any teacher, awakened of his own accord, attaining unsurpassed, complete awakening, every trace of greed, hatred, and delusion entirely exhausted within him. He abides forever, without change, neither arising nor ceasing, free of every sorrow and fear. Toward every being, his own mind remains perfectly equal, exactly as a father and mother regard their only child with equal love. In both body and mind, he is supreme among every assembly, and yet, though he surpasses all, he holds no arrogance at all; whether anointed with fragrant balm or cut with a knife, his own mind makes no distinction between the two. His wisdom penetrates every dharma without obstruction, and he is fully endowed with the ten powers, the four kinds of fearlessness, the five wisdoms and samādhis, great loving-kindness and great compassion, and the three foundations of mindfulness — it is for this very reason that he is named "Buddha." He has consented to accept my own invitation tomorrow, and it is for this very reason that I am so hurriedly occupied, without leisure to attend properly to you.' Sudatta said: 'Excellent, great one! This one you call "Buddha," whose merit is unsurpassed — where, exactly, does he now dwell?' The elder answered: 'He now dwells right here, in this great city of Rājagṛha, at the Bamboo Grove monastery of Kalandaka.' Sudatta then, with his whole mind, called to remembrance the Buddha's own every merit — his ten powers, his fearlessness, his five wisdoms and samādhis, his great loving-kindness and great compassion, and his three foundations of mindfulness — and, as he did so, a great radiance suddenly appeared, fierce and brilliant, exactly like the light of day, and he at once followed this very light out of the house, all the way to the city gate. Through the Buddha's own supernatural power, the gate opened of itself. Once he had passed through the gate, he came upon a shrine to the local deities along the road, and Sudatta, passing it, bowed and paid it reverence — and, at that moment, the darkness returned once more. His mind grew fearful and afraid, and he wished to turn back to where he had been lodging, when a certain deity, dwelling at that very city gate, spoke to Sudatta, saying: 'Good sir, should you go on to where the Tathāgata dwells, you shall gain great and wholesome benefit.' Sudatta said: 'What kind of wholesome benefit do you mean?' The deity answered: 'Elder, suppose a man were to give, to a single person, genuine jeweled ornaments, a hundred fine steeds, a hundred fragrant elephants, a hundred jeweled carriages, a hundred figures cast in gold, a hundred beautiful women adorned with strings of every kind of precious jewel, the finest of palaces and dwellings, halls and chambers carved and engraved with the finest artistry, and a hundred each of golden trays filled with silver grain and silver trays filled with golden grain — and were he to repeat this very gift to every single person throughout the whole of Jambudvīpa — the merit thereby gained would still not equal the merit of a single person who merely takes a single step, with the intention of going to where the Tathāgata dwells.' Sudatta said: 'Good sir, who, exactly, are you?' The deity answered: 'Elder, I am the son of the brahmin Excellent Marks, and I was, in a former life, your own good friend. It was because I once saw Śāriputra and Mahāmaudgalyāyana, and my own mind gave rise to joy at the sight of them, that, upon casting off that former body, I came to be reborn as the son of Vaiśravaṇa, the heavenly king of the north, entrusted especially with guarding and protecting this very city of Rājagṛha. Simply through bowing in reverence to Śāriputra and the others, and giving rise to a joyful mind, I have already attained a body as fine and wondrous as this — how much more merit, then, would come from actually meeting the great teacher, the Tathāgata himself, and bowing to him in reverent offering?' Upon hearing this, the elder Sudatta at once returned to the road and came to where I was. Having arrived, he bowed his head to the ground in reverence at my feet, and I then taught the Dharma for him, exactly as was fitting. Upon hearing it, the elder attained the fruit of stream-entry, and, having attained and verified this fruit, he further asked of me: 'Might the Tathāgata, in his own great compassion, deign to visit the city of Śrāvastī, and receive my own humble offerings there?' I then asked him: 'In your own kingdom of Śrāvastī, is there perhaps some monastery already able to receive and accommodate me?' Sudatta said: 'Should the Buddha, in his own pity, indeed deign to visit, I shall exert my very utmost to arrange and establish one.' Good son, I, at that time, silently accepted this very invitation. The elder Sudatta, having received my consent, then said to me: 'Since I have never before undertaken a task of this kind, I ask only that the Tathāgata send Śāriputra to instruct me in the proper method, and I shall then personally see to its construction, according to his own direction.'"

Chinese Source

「時舍利弗與須達多共載一車,往舍衛城。我神力故,經一日夜便到所止。時須達多白舍利弗:『大德!此大城外,何處有地不近不遠,多饒泉池,有好林樹、花果,欝茂清淨閑豫?我當於中,為佛世尊及比丘僧造立精舍。』舍利弗言:『祇陀園林不近不遠,清淨寂寞,多有泉池,樹木花果隨時而有,此處最勝,可安立精舍。』時須達多聞是語已,即往祇陀大長者所,告祇陀言:『我今欲為無上法王造立僧坊,惟仁園地任中造立。吾今欲買,能見與不?』祇陀答言:『設以真金遍布其地,猶不相與。』須達多言:『善哉,祇陀!林地屬我,汝便取金。』祇陀答言:『我園不賣,云何取金?』須達多言:『若意不了,當共往詣斷事人所。』時二長者即共俱往斷事者所。斷事者言:『園屬須達,祇陀取金。』須達長者即時使人車馬載負隨集布地,一日之中,唯五百步,金未周遍。祇陀言曰:『長者若悔,隨意聽止。』須達多言:『吾不悔也。』自念當出何藏金足?祇陀念言:『如來法王,真實無上,所說妙法,清淨無染,故使斯人輕寶乃爾。』即語須達:『餘未遍者,不復須金,請以見與。我自為佛造立門樓,常使如來經由出入。』祇陀長者自造門樓,須達長者七日之中成立大房,足三百口,禪房靜處六十三所,冬室夏堂各各別異。厨坊浴室、洗脚之處,大小圊廁無不備足。所設已訖,即執香鑪,向王舍城遙作是言:『所設已辦,惟願如來慈哀憐愍,為諸眾生受是住處。』我時玄知是長者心,即與大眾發王舍城,譬如壯士屈伸臂頃,至舍衛城祇陀園林須達精舍。我既到已,須達長者以其所設奉施於我。我時受已,即住其中。◎」

Ru-Yi Translation

"At that time, Śāriputra and Sudatta rode together in a single carriage toward the city of Śrāvastī. Through my own supernatural power, they arrived at their destination within the span of a single day and night. Sudatta then said to Śāriputra: 'Venerable one, outside this great city, is there a place, neither too near nor too far, richly endowed with springs and pools, fine groves of trees, flowers and fruit, lush, pure, and tranquil, where I might build a monastery for the Buddha, the World-Honored One, and for the community of monks?' Śāriputra said: 'The grove belonging to Prince Jeta is neither too near nor too far, pure and quiet, richly endowed with springs and pools, its trees, flowers, and fruit appearing each in their own proper season — this place is the very finest, and a monastery may well be established there.' Upon hearing this, Sudatta at once went to the great elder Prince Jeta, and said to him: 'I now wish to build a monastery for the unsurpassed Dharma-king — only your own garden land is fit for its construction. I now wish to purchase it — will you grant it to me?' Jeta answered: 'Even should you cover the entire ground with genuine gold, I would still not grant it to you.' Sudatta said: 'Excellent, Jeta! Then the grove already belongs to me, and you need only take the gold.' Jeta answered: 'My garden is not for sale — how, then, could I take any gold for it?' Sudatta said: 'If we cannot come to an understanding between ourselves, let us go together to one who settles such disputes.' The two elders then went together to an arbiter, and this arbiter declared: 'The garden belongs to Sudatta, and Jeta shall take the gold.' The elder Sudatta at once had his own men load carts and horses with gold, and had it spread across the ground — yet, within a single day, only five hundred paces of ground had been covered, and the gold was not yet sufficient to cover it all. Jeta then said: 'Elder, should you now regret this bargain, you are free to stop as you wish.' Sudatta said: 'I do not regret it at all' — and began reflecting to himself on which of his own treasuries he might draw upon to make up what remained. Jeta, reflecting to himself, thought: 'The Tathāgata, this Dharma-king, must truly be unsurpassed indeed, and the wondrous Dharma he teaches must truly be pure and undefiled, that it should cause this very man to regard even such treasure so lightly.' He then said to Sudatta: 'For whatever ground remains uncovered, no further gold is needed at all — I ask only that you allow me to give it as my own gift. I myself shall build the Buddha a gate and tower, so that the Tathāgata may forever pass through it in coming and going.' The elder Jeta thus built the gate and tower entirely at his own expense, while the elder Sudatta, within the span of seven days, completed a great residence hall, sufficient for three hundred monks, together with sixty-three separate quiet meditation chambers, and separate winter chambers and summer halls, each distinct from the other. Kitchens, bathhouses, places for washing the feet, and every kind of large and small latrine — nothing at all was left unprovided. Once every preparation was complete, he took up an incense burner and, facing toward the city of Rājagṛha in the distance, spoke these very words: 'Every preparation has now been completed — I ask only that the Tathāgata, in his own compassionate mercy, accept this dwelling place for the sake of every being.' I, at that time, knowing this elder's own mind by my own hidden knowledge, at once set out from the city of Rājagṛha, together with the whole great assembly, and, in the time it takes a strong man to bend and extend his own arm, arrived at the city of Śrāvastī, at the elder Sudatta's own monastery within Prince Jeta's grove. Having arrived there, the elder Sudatta offered to me everything he had prepared, and I, accepting it, thereupon took up residence within it."

Reading note — Ru-Yi

The story is structured as a chain of escalating conversions, each one preparing the next: Sudatta's own fright at merely hearing the word "Buddha" gives way, through the guiding deity's testimony, to a concrete measure of value (a single step taken toward the Tathāgata outweighing the most extravagant material gift imaginable, repeated across the whole of Jambudvīpa) that only makes sense once he has already met the Buddha and attained the stream-enterer's fruit for himself. The gate-of-light episode — radiant while he holds the Buddha's virtues in mind, extinguished the instant fear intrudes and he bows to a lesser shrine instead — dramatizes a point this whole fascicle's discussion of momentary, non-persisting mental states has been building toward: even a single interruption of the right kind of attention is enough to lose, for a moment, an accomplishment that must then be regained by the deity's own timely encouragement.

The garden purchase itself is this collection's most famous instance of a generosity contest resolved not by legal victory but by mutual escalation: Jeta's flippant, seemingly impossible price (gold covering the entire ground) is met literally rather than argued down, and it is precisely Sudatta's willingness to actually attempt this absurd bargain — pouring out cart after cart of gold rather than negotiating — that converts Jeta from a reluctant seller into a co-donor who gives the remaining, uncovered ground outright. The story closes, fittingly, on the Buddha's own instantaneous arrival "in the time it takes a strong man to bend and extend his own arm" — a small, understated miracle that lets the human drama of Sudatta and Jeta's competing generosity remain the story's actual center, with the Buddha's own supernatural power appearing only once every human effort has already been spent.

Part 29 Complete

This closes Part 29 (fascicle 29 of 40). Lion's Roar's question about bondage without a persisting self opens onto the candle-wax seal, the wax-and-clay image of shaped dependency without any substance carried forward, and the seed-severed/fruit-still-bound distinction that lets an arhat be both liberated and not yet awakened at once. A rare metalinguistic pause catalogues eight kinds of scriptural simile before correcting the lamp-and-oil image against Lion's Roar's own sharpest objection. A run of similes — the reciting student, the goldsmith, the newborn calf, the lion-king's lingering reputation — explains how momentary, ownerless mental states can still accumulate into real, inheritable attainment, tested against a stream-enterer reborn in an evil land who keeps his precepts anyway. True cultivation of precept, concentration, and wisdom is defined twice over, first by intention and then by concrete content, before the fascicle turns to buddha-nature's own paradox of being shared by every being at once without ever being divided or exhausted — a single path, a single shade, one poison running unchanged through milk, curd, and ghee alike. The fascicle closes with the Buddha's own account, across four past lives, of why humble Kuśinagara was never really humble at all, and the story of Sudatta covering Prince Jeta's garden with gold to build the Jetavana monastery. Part 30 continues 師子吼菩薩品第十一之四, carrying Lion's Roar's inquiry into buddha-nature further still.

Continue to Part 30 →