The Elephant and the Blind Men
Lion's Roar presses his final and sharpest challenge to buddha-nature: if it draws a being toward awakening the way a magnet draws iron, why bother cultivating the path at all? The Buddha's answer runs through seven kinds of people crossing the great river of birth and death — some sinking, some barely surfacing, one reaching the far shore entirely — before turning to why a magnet, in fact, never simply pulls iron of its own accord, six blind men each mistaking a single part of an elephant for the whole animal, and a long list of what buddha-nature is truly called: great compassion, great joy, great faith, the single-child stage. The fascicle, and with it the entire six-part chapter opened in Part 27, closes with the sūtra's own eight wonders compared to the ocean's, an account of how a bodhisattva tests his own resolve through extreme austerity and voluntary rebirth as a starving beast, and Lion's Roar's own closing hymn of praise.
If Buddha-Nature Is Already There, Why Cultivate the Path?
◎師子吼菩薩言:「世尊!若一切業不定得果,一切眾生悉有佛性,應當修習八聖道者,何因緣故,一切眾生悉不得是大般涅槃?世尊!若一切眾生有佛性者,即當定得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,何須修習八聖道耶?世尊!如此經中說有病人,若得醫藥及瞻病人,隨病飲食,若使不得,皆悉除差。一切眾生亦復如是,若遇聲聞及辟支佛、諸佛菩薩、諸善知識,若聞說法,修習聖道。若不遇、不聞、不修習道,悉當得成阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。何以故?以佛性故。世尊!譬如日月,無有能遮,令不得至頞多山邊、四大河水不至大海、一闡提等不至地獄。一切眾生亦復如是,無有能遮令不得至阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。何以故?以佛性故。世尊!以是義故,一切眾生不須修道,以佛性力故,應得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,不以修習聖道力故。世尊!若一闡提、犯四重禁、五逆罪等,不得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提者,應須修習。以因佛性定當得故,非因修習,然後得也。世尊!譬如磁石,去鐵雖遠,以其力故,鐵則隨著。眾生佛性亦復如是,是故不須勤修習道。」
Lion's Roar Bodhisattva said: "World-Honored One, if not every karmic action, without exception, is certain to yield its fruit, and every being, without exception, possesses buddha-nature, then, should one still be obliged to cultivate the eightfold noble path, for what cause and condition does every being still fail to attain this very great nirvāṇa? World-Honored One, if every being truly possesses buddha-nature, he ought thereby to be certain to attain unsurpassed, complete awakening — why, then, would he need to cultivate the eightfold noble path at all? World-Honored One, as this very sūtra teaches, a sick person, should he obtain medicine, a physician's care, and food and drink suited to his own illness, is entirely cured — and, should he fail to obtain these, he remains uncured. Every being is exactly the same: should he encounter a śrāvaka, a pratyekabuddha, a buddha, a bodhisattva, or any good friend, and hear the Dharma taught, he cultivates the noble path — and, should he encounter none of these, hear nothing, and cultivate no path at all, he ought still to attain unsurpassed, complete awakening regardless. Why is this? Because of buddha-nature. World-Honored One, it is like the sun and moon, which nothing at all can prevent from reaching the peak of Mount Asta; like the four great rivers, which nothing can prevent from reaching the great ocean; and like the icchantika, whom nothing can prevent from reaching hell. Every being is exactly the same: nothing at all can prevent him from reaching unsurpassed, complete awakening. Why is this? Because of buddha-nature. World-Honored One, it is for this very reason that every being need not cultivate the path at all — it is through the very power of buddha-nature that he ought to attain unsurpassed, complete awakening, and not through the power of cultivating the noble path. World-Honored One, should the icchantika, one who has violated the four gravest precepts, or one who has committed the five heinous crimes, truly fail to attain unsurpassed, complete awakening, then cultivation would indeed be necessary — but, since it is through the cause of buddha-nature that one is certain to attain it, and not through the cause of cultivation, cultivation is not truly needed at all. World-Honored One, it is like a magnet: though the iron lies at some distance from it, through its own power, the iron is drawn to cling to it regardless. A being's own buddha-nature is exactly the same — it is for this very reason that there is no need to diligently cultivate the path at all."
Lion's Roar's magnet argument is the sharpest possible formulation of a worry this entire chapter has circled since Part 27's opening question about how universal possession relates to actual practice: if buddha-nature's own causal power is sufficient on its own, cultivation becomes not merely optional but positively pointless — a redundant effort added on top of a process already guaranteed to complete itself. The sun/moon, river/ocean, and icchantika/hell similes are chosen precisely because each names an outcome that follows from a fixed, structural fact about the universe rather than from any effort on the part of the thing moving — the sun reaches its zenith and the river reaches the sea regardless of what either "does," and the icchantika's own fall into hell was itself established, back in Part 26, as a matter of severed roots rather than active pursuit. Lion's Roar's argument gains its force by asking why buddha-nature's own causal relationship to awakening should be any different in kind from these three cases.
Seven Kinds of People Crossing the River
佛言:「善哉,善哉!善男子!如恒河邊有七種人,若為洗浴、恐畏寇賊、或為採花,則入河中。第一人者入水則沈。何以故?羸無勢力,不習浮故。第二人者雖沒還出,出已復沒。何以故?身力大故則能還出,不習浮故出已還沒。第三人者沒已即出,出更不沒。何以故?身重故沒,力大故出,先習浮故,出已即住。第四人者入已便沒,沒已還出,出已即住,遍觀四方。何以故?重故則沈,力大故還出,習浮則住,不知出處,故觀四方。第五人者入已即沈,沈已便出,出已即住,住已觀方,觀已即去。何以故?為怖畏故。第六人者入已即去,淺處則住。何以故?觀賊近遠故。第七人者既至彼岸,登上大山,無復恐怖,離諸怨賊,受大快樂。「善男子!生死大河亦復如是,有七種人畏煩惱賊故,發意欲渡生死大河,出家剃髮,身被法服。既出家已,親近惡友,隨順其教,聽受邪法,所謂眾生身者即是五蔭,五蔭者即名五大,眾生若死永斷五大,斷五大故,何須修習善惡諸業,是故當知無有善惡及善惡報。如是則名一闡提也。一闡提者名斷善根,斷善根故沒生死河,不能得出。何以故?惡業重故、無信力故,如恒河邊第一人也。善男子,一闡提輩有六因緣,沒三惡道不能得出。何等為六?一者惡心熾盛故、二者不見後世故、三者樂習煩惱故、四者遠離善根故、五者惡業障隔故、六者親近惡知識故。復有五事,沒三惡道。何等為五?一者於比丘邊作非法故、二者比丘尼邊作非法故、三者自在用僧鬘物故、四者母邊作非法故、五者於五部僧互生是非故。復有五事,沒三惡道。何等為五?一者常說無善惡果故、二者殺發菩提心眾生故、三者憙說法師過失故、四者法說非法非法說法故、五者為求法過而聽受故。復有三事,沒三惡道。何等為三?一謂如來無常永滅、二謂正法無常遷變、三謂僧寶可滅壞故,是故常沒三惡道中。」
The Buddha said: "Excellent, excellent! Good son, it is like the bank of the Ganges River, along which there are seven kinds of people who enter the river, whether to bathe, to escape fear of bandits, or to gather flowers. The first person, upon entering the water, sinks at once. Why is this? Because he is weak, without any strength, and has never practiced swimming. The second person, though he sinks, comes back up, and, having come up, sinks once more. Why is this? Because his own bodily strength is great, he is able to rise again — yet, because he has never practiced swimming, once he has risen, he sinks once more. The third person sinks and then comes up, and, once up, sinks no more. Why is this? He sinks because his body is heavy, rises because his strength is great, and, having previously practiced swimming, remains afloat once he has risen. The fourth person, upon entering, sinks, and, having sunk, rises again, and, once risen, remains afloat, looking about in every direction. Why is this? He sinks because he is heavy, rises again because his strength is great, remains afloat because he has practiced swimming, and, not knowing where to find the shore, looks about in every direction. The fifth person, upon entering, sinks at once, and, having sunk, rises, and, once risen, remains afloat, and, having looked about, sets off at once. Why is this? Because of his own fear. The sixth person, upon entering, sets off at once, and stops once he reaches a shallow place. Why is this? Because he watches to see whether the bandits are near or far. The seventh person has already reached the far shore, and climbs a great mountain there, free of all further fear, departed from every hostile bandit, and receiving great happiness. "Good son, the great river of birth-and-death is exactly the same. There are seven kinds of people who, fearing the bandit of affliction, resolve to cross this great river of birth-and-death, becoming renunciants, shaving their heads, and wearing the very robes of the Dharma. Having become renunciants, they draw close to evil friends, follow their teaching, and accept and receive wrong teachings — namely, that a being's own body is nothing but the five aggregates, and the five aggregates are nothing but the five great elements, and, should a being die, these five great elements are forever severed — and, since the five great elements are severed, what need would there be to cultivate wholesome or unwholesome karmic action at all? — and, on this account, one should know that there is neither wholesome nor unwholesome action, nor any fruit of wholesome or unwholesome action at all. A person of exactly this kind is named an icchantika. The icchantika is named one who has severed his own wholesome roots — and, because he has severed his wholesome roots, he sinks within the river of birth-and-death, unable ever to come up. Why is this? Because his evil karma is heavy, and he lacks the very power of faith — he is exactly like the first person at the bank of the Ganges. Good son, the icchantika sinks into the three evil destinies, unable to come up, through any of six causes and conditions. What are these six? First, an evil mind blazing fiercely; second, failing to see any future life at all; third, delighting in the habitual practice of affliction; fourth, keeping distant from every wholesome root; fifth, being obstructed by the very weight of his own evil karma; and sixth, drawing close to evil companions. There are, further, five things that cause one to sink into the three evil destinies. What are these five? First, committing an unlawful act with a monk; second, committing an unlawful act with a nun; third, freely making use of the Saṅgha's own communal property; fourth, committing an unlawful act with one's own mother; and fifth, stirring up dispute and discord among the five divisions of the Saṅgha. There are, further, five things that cause one to sink into the three evil destinies. What are these five? First, forever teaching that there is no wholesome or unwholesome fruit at all; second, killing a being who has given rise to the bodhi-mind; third, delighting in speaking of a Dharma-teacher's own faults; fourth, calling the Dharma non-Dharma, and calling non-Dharma the Dharma; and fifth, listening to and receiving teachings for the sake of finding fault with the Dharma. There are, further, three things that cause one to sink into the three evil destinies. What are these three? First, holding that the Tathāgata is impermanent and forever extinguished; second, holding that the true Dharma is impermanent and subject to change; and third, holding that the jewel of the Saṅgha can be destroyed — it is for reasons of exactly this kind that one forever sinks within the three evil destinies."
「第二人者,發意欲渡生死大河,斷善根故,沒不能出。所言出者,親近善友則得信心。是信心者,信施、施果,信善、善果,信惡、惡果,信生、死、苦、無常、敗壞,是名為信。以得信心修習淨戒,受持讀誦書寫解說,常樂惠施,善修智慧。以鈍根故,復遇惡友,不能修習身、戒、心、慧,聽受邪法;或值惡時,處惡國土,斷諸善根。斷善根故,常沒生死,如恒河邊第二人也。「第三人者,發意欲渡生死大河,斷善根故於中沈沒,親近善友得名為出,信於如來是一切智、常恒無變、為眾生故說無上道,一切眾生悉有佛性,如來非滅,法、僧亦爾,無有滅壞。一闡提等不斷其法,終不能得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,要當遠離然後乃得。以信心故修習淨戒,修習戒已,受持讀誦書寫解說十二部經,為諸眾生廣宣流布,樂於惠施,修習智慧,以利根故,堅住信慧,心無退轉,如恒河邊第三人也。「第四人者,發意欲渡生死大河,斷善根故於中沈沒,親近善友故得信心,是名為出,得信心故,受持讀誦書寫解說十二部經,為眾生故廣宣流布,樂於惠施,修習智慧,以利根故堅住信慧,心無退轉,遍觀四方,觀四方者四沙門果,如恒河邊第四人也。「第五人者,發意欲渡生死大河,斷善根故於中沈沒,親近善友故得信心,是名為出,以信心故,受持讀誦書寫解說十二部經,為眾生故廣宣流布,樂於慧施修習智慧,以利根故,堅住信慧,心無退轉,無退轉已,即便前進,前進者謂辟支佛,雖能自渡,不及眾生,是名為去,如恒河邊第五人也。「第六人者,發意欲渡生死大河,斷善根故於中沈沒,親近善友獲得信心,得信心故名之為出,以信心故,受持讀誦書寫解說十二部經,為眾生故廣宣流布,樂於惠施,修習智慧,以利根故,堅住信慧,心無退轉,無退轉已即復前進遂到淺處,到淺處已即住不去,住不去者所謂菩薩,為欲度脫諸眾生故,住觀煩惱,如恒河邊第六人也。「第七人者,發意欲渡生死大河,斷善根故於中沈沒,親近善友獲得信心,得信心已是名為出,以信心故,受持讀誦書寫解說十二部經,為眾生故廣宣流布,樂於惠施,修習智慧,以利根故,堅住信慧,心無退轉,無退轉已即便前進,既前進已得到彼岸,登大高山,離諸恐怖,多受安樂。善男子!彼岸山者喻於如來,受安樂者喻佛常住,大高山者喻大涅槃。」
"The second person resolves to cross this great river of birth-and-death, yet, having severed his own wholesome roots, sinks and is unable to rise. To 'rise,' here, means this: through drawing close to a good friend, one attains faith. This very faith means believing in giving and in the fruit of giving; believing in wholesome deeds and their wholesome fruit; believing in unwholesome deeds and their unwholesome fruit; and believing in birth, death, suffering, impermanence, and decay — this is named faith. Having attained faith, one cultivates pure precepts, upholding, reciting, copying out, and expounding scripture, forever delighting in generous giving, and skillfully cultivating wisdom. Yet, because his own faculties are dull, he encounters an evil friend once more, and, unable to cultivate body, precept, mind, and wisdom, he accepts and receives wrong teachings instead; or he happens upon an evil age, dwelling in an evil land, and severs every wholesome root. Because he has severed his own wholesome roots, he forever sinks within birth-and-death — he is exactly like the second person at the bank of the Ganges. "The third person resolves to cross this great river of birth-and-death, and, having severed his own wholesome roots, sinks within it — yet, drawing close to a good friend, he is thereby named as one who rises. He believes that the Tathāgata is himself omniscient, ever-abiding and without change, teaching the unsurpassed path for the sake of every being; that every being, without exception, possesses buddha-nature; that the Tathāgata does not truly become extinct, and that the Dharma and the Saṅgha are exactly the same, never destroyed. He believes that the icchantika, so long as he fails to sever this very icchantika-nature, can never attain unsurpassed, complete awakening, and that only by departing from it entirely can he finally attain it. Through faith, he cultivates pure precepts, and, having cultivated these precepts, upholds, recites, copies out, and expounds the twelve divisions of scripture, broadly proclaiming and spreading them for the sake of every being, delighting in generous giving, and cultivating wisdom — and, because his faculties are sharp, he remains firmly grounded in faith and wisdom, his mind never retrogressing — he is exactly like the third person at the bank of the Ganges. "The fourth person resolves to cross this great river of birth-and-death, and, having severed his own wholesome roots, sinks within it — yet, drawing close to a good friend, he attains faith, and this is named rising. Through this very faith, he upholds, recites, copies out, and expounds the twelve divisions of scripture, broadly proclaiming and spreading them for the sake of beings, delighting in generous giving, and cultivating wisdom — and, because his faculties are sharp, he remains firmly grounded in faith and wisdom, his mind never retrogressing, and he looks about in every direction — this looking about in every direction is a likeness for the four śramaṇa fruits — he is exactly like the fourth person at the bank of the Ganges. "The fifth person resolves to cross this great river of birth-and-death, and, having severed his own wholesome roots, sinks within it — yet, drawing close to a good friend, he attains faith, and this is named rising. Through this very faith, he upholds, recites, copies out, and expounds the twelve divisions of scripture, broadly proclaiming and spreading them for the sake of beings, delighting in generous giving, and cultivating wisdom — and, because his faculties are sharp, he remains firmly grounded in faith and wisdom, his mind never retrogressing, and, having never retrogressed, he then advances — this advancing is a likeness for the pratyekabuddha, who, though able to cross over himself, does not reach out to save others — this is named setting off — he is exactly like the fifth person at the bank of the Ganges. "The sixth person resolves to cross this great river of birth-and-death, and, having severed his own wholesome roots, sinks within it — yet, drawing close to a good friend, attains faith, and, through this attainment, is named as one who rises. Through this very faith, he upholds, recites, copies out, and expounds the twelve divisions of scripture, broadly proclaiming and spreading them for the sake of beings, delighting in generous giving, and cultivating wisdom — and, because his faculties are sharp, he remains firmly grounded in faith and wisdom, his mind never retrogressing, and, having never retrogressed, he advances further still, and reaches a shallow place — and, having reached this shallow place, he stops there and goes no further. This stopping without going further is a likeness for the bodhisattva, who, wishing to deliver every being, remains there, contemplating their own affliction — he is exactly like the sixth person at the bank of the Ganges. "The seventh person resolves to cross this great river of birth-and-death, and, having severed his own wholesome roots, sinks within it — yet, drawing close to a good friend, attains faith, and, having attained it, is named as one who rises. Through this very faith, he upholds, recites, copies out, and expounds the twelve divisions of scripture, broadly proclaiming and spreading them for the sake of beings, delighting in generous giving, and cultivating wisdom — and, because his faculties are sharp, he remains firmly grounded in faith and wisdom, his mind never retrogressing, and, having never retrogressed, he advances further still, and, having advanced, reaches the very far shore, climbing a great, high mountain, departed from every fear, and receiving great happiness in abundance. Good son, the mountain upon the far shore is a likeness for the Tathāgata; receiving this happiness is a likeness for the Buddha's own permanence; and this great, high mountain is a likeness for the great nirvāṇa."
The seven river-crossers form a single continuum from total failure to complete success, and the sūtra's own mapping is precise about what actually distinguishes each stage: the first two people (the icchantika, and the ordinary being who gains faith but loses it again to bad company or a hostile environment) both fail for the same underlying reason — impermanent wholesome roots, easily severed by circumstance — while people three through seven all share the same foundation (faith, precept-keeping, scriptural study, generosity, wisdom) and differ only in how far that same foundation actually carries them: the stream-enterer through arhat's four fruits looking about for the shore, the pratyekabuddha advancing but only far enough to save himself, the bodhisattva stopping deliberately in the shallows to keep contemplating and helping others still struggling, and only the Tathāgata reaching the mountain itself. Read this way, the parable answers Lion's Roar's magnet challenge before the Buddha even states his argument explicitly: nothing in this entire spectrum happens automatically, and the single largest variable determining outcome — never named directly, but implied by exactly what separates person one from person three — is whether a good friend and genuine cultivation actually arrive, which is the entire function this fascicle's argument goes on to assign to the eightfold path.
The sixteen-item breakdown of exactly how an icchantika sinks (six general causes, five clerical-specific transgressions, five doctrinal corruptions, three denials of the three jewels' permanence) is this collection's most granular taxonomy yet of the icchantika condition, tracked since Part 19's earliest treatment — worth reading against Part 26's "sevenfold etymology" and "three kinds of patients" frameworks as a third, complementary lens: where those earlier passages explained why the icchantika's condition is not permanently fixed at the level of buddha-nature, this passage catalogues, in exhaustive practical detail, exactly what specific acts and attitudes constitute the condition in the first place.
Why the Path Is Still Needed
「善男子!是恒河邊如是諸人,悉具手足而不能渡。一切眾生亦復如是,實有佛寶、法寶、僧寶,如來常說諸法要義,有八聖道大般涅槃,而諸眾生悉不能得。此非我咎,亦非聖道、眾生等過。當知悉是煩惱過惡,以是義故,一切眾生不得涅槃。善男子!譬如良醫知病說藥,病者不服,非醫咎也。善男子!如有施主,以其所有施一切人,有不受者非施主咎。善男子!譬如日出,幽冥皆明,盲瞽之人不見道路,非日過也。善男子!如恒河水能除渴乏,渴者不飲,非水咎也。善男子!譬如大地,普生果實,平等無二,農夫不種,非地過也。善男子!如來普為一切眾生廣開分別十二部經,眾生不受,非如來咎。善男子!若修道者,即得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。
"Good son, every one of these people at the bank of the Ganges was fully endowed with hands and feet, and yet was unable to cross. Every being is exactly the same: the jewel of the Buddha, the jewel of the Dharma, and the jewel of the Saṅgha truly exist; the Tathāgata forever teaches the essential meaning of every dharma; the eightfold noble path and the great nirvāṇa truly exist — and yet every being remains unable to attain them. This is not my own fault, nor is it any fault of the noble path or of beings themselves — one should know that it is, in every case, the fault of affliction alone, and it is for this very reason that beings fail to attain nirvāṇa. Good son, it is like a skilled physician who knows the illness and prescribes the medicine — should the patient fail to take it, this is not the physician's fault at all. Good son, it is like a donor who gives everything he has to everyone — should someone refuse to accept it, this is not the donor's fault at all. Good son, it is like the sun rising, illuminating every dark place at once — should a blind man fail to see the road before him, this is not the sun's fault at all. Good son, it is like the water of the Ganges, able to quench every thirst — should a thirsty man fail to drink of it, this is not the water's fault at all. Good son, it is like the great earth, bringing forth every kind of fruit equally, without discrimination — should a farmer fail to plant his seed, this is not the earth's fault at all. Good son, the Tathāgata broadly opens and distinctly expounds the twelve divisions of scripture for the sake of every being alike — should beings fail to receive them, this is not the Tathāgata's fault at all. Good son, should one truly cultivate the path, he thereby attains unsurpassed, complete awakening.
「善男子!汝言眾生悉有佛性,應得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,如磁石者。善哉,善哉!以有佛性因緣力故,得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提;若言不須修聖道者,是義不然。善男子!譬如有人行於曠野,渴乏遇井,其井幽深,雖不見水,當知必有。是人方便,求覓罐綆,汲取則見。佛性亦爾,一切眾生雖復有之,要須修習無漏聖道,然後得見。善男子!如有胡麻則得見油,離諸方便則不得見,甘蔗亦爾。善男子!如三十三天、北欝單越,雖是有法,若無善業、神通道力,則不能見。地中草根及地下水,以地覆故,眾生不見。佛性亦爾,不修聖道,故不得見。「善男子!如汝所說,世有病人,若遇瞻病,良醫好藥,隨病飲食,及以不遇,悉得差者。善男子!我為六住諸菩薩等說如是義。善男子!譬如虛空,於諸眾生,非內非外,非內外故亦無罣礙,眾生佛性亦復如是。善男子!譬如有人,財在異方,雖不現前隨意受用,有人問之,則言我許。何以故?以定有故。眾生佛性亦復如是,非此非彼,以定得故,言一切有。善男子!譬如眾生,造作諸業,若善若惡,非內非外。如是業性,非有非無,亦復非是本無今有、非無因出,非此作此受、此作彼受、彼作彼受;無作無受,時節和合而得果報。眾生佛性亦復如是,亦復非是本無今有、非內非外、非有非無、非此非彼,非餘處來、非無因緣、亦非一切眾生不見,有諸菩薩時節因緣和合得見。時節者所謂十住菩薩摩訶薩修八聖道,於諸眾生得平等心,爾時得見,不名為作。」
"Good son, you say that, since every being possesses buddha-nature, he ought to attain unsurpassed, complete awakening, exactly as iron is drawn to a magnet. Excellent, excellent! It is indeed through the very cause and condition of buddha-nature's own power that one attains unsurpassed, complete awakening — but to say, on this account, that there is no need to cultivate the noble path at all is, I think, not correct. Good son, it is like a man traveling through the wilderness who, thirsting, comes upon a well — this well is deep and dark, and, though he cannot see the water within it, he knows for certain that water must be there. This man then, through skillful means, seeks out a bucket and a rope, and, drawing it up, he sees the water at last. Buddha-nature is exactly the same: though every being, without exception, already possesses it, he must still cultivate the undefiled noble path before he is able to see it at last. Good son, it is like sesame seed, from which one obtains oil — apart from the proper means, one is unable to see this oil at all; sugarcane is exactly the same. Good son, it is like the Trāyastriṃśa heaven, or Uttarakuru in the north — though these truly exist, without wholesome karma and the power of supernatural attainment, one is unable to see them at all. The roots of grass within the earth, and the water beneath the ground, are hidden from beings' own sight because the earth covers them over. Buddha-nature is exactly the same — it is because the noble path is not cultivated that it cannot be seen. "Good son, as you yourself have said, there are, in the world, sick people who, should they receive proper care, a skilled physician, good medicine, and food and drink suited to their illness, are entirely cured — and, should they fail to receive these, remain uncured. Good son, I have taught this very teaching for the sake of bodhisattvas of the sixth abiding and beyond. Good son, it is like empty space, which, with respect to every being, is neither internal nor external — and, being neither internal nor external, it is also without any obstruction. A being's own buddha-nature is exactly the same. Good son, it is like a man whose own wealth lies in some distant land — though it is not presently before him for him to freely make use of, should someone ask him about it, he can still say, 'It is mine.' Why is this? Because it certainly exists. A being's own buddha-nature is exactly the same: it is neither here nor there, and yet, because it is certain to be attained, one says that every being possesses it. Good son, it is like a being who performs every kind of karmic action, whether wholesome or unwholesome — this action is neither internal nor external. The very nature of this karma is neither existent nor non-existent; it is not something originally absent and now present, nor is it produced without any cause at all; it is not a case of one person acting and that same person alone experiencing the result, nor of one person acting and a different person experiencing it, nor of a different person acting and that same different person experiencing it — there is, in truth, no fixed actor and no fixed experiencer at all, and it is only once the proper season and conditions come together that its fruit is obtained. A being's own buddha-nature is exactly the same: it, too, is not something originally absent and now present, neither internal nor external, neither existent nor non-existent, neither here nor there; it does not come from anywhere else at all, nor does it arise without any cause or condition; nor is it the case that no being at all is able to see it — for there are bodhisattvas who, once the proper season and causes and conditions come together, are able to see it. This proper season is none other than the bodhisattva mahāsattva of the ten abidings cultivating the eightfold noble path, and attaining an equal mind toward every being — it is at exactly this time that he attains its seeing, and this can in no way be named a case of 'producing' it."
「善男子!汝言如磁石者,是義不然。何以故?石不吸鐵。所以者何?無心業故。善男子!異法有故異法出生,異法無故異法滅壞,無有作者無有壞者。善男子!猶如猛火不能焚薪,火出薪壞,名為焚薪。善男子!譬如葵藿隨日而轉,而是葵藿亦無敬心、無識、無業,異法性故而自迴轉。善男子!如芭蕉樹,因雷增長,是樹無耳、無心、意、識,異法有故異法增長,異法無故異法滅壞。善男子!如阿叔迦樹,女人摩觸花為之出,是樹無心亦無覺觸,異法有故異法出生,異法無故異法滅壞。善男子!如橘得尸,果則滋多,而是橘樹無心無觸,異法有故異法滋多,異法無故異法滅壞。善男子!如安石榴塼骨糞故,果實繁茂,安石榴樹亦無心觸,異法有故異法出生,異法無故異法滅壞。善男子!磁石吸鐵亦復如是,異法有故異法出生,異法無故異法滅壞。眾生佛性亦復如是,不能吸得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。善男子!無明不能吸取諸行,行亦不能吸取識也,亦得名為無明緣行、行緣於識,有佛無佛,法界常住。「善男子!若言佛性住眾生中者。善男子!常法無住,若有住處即是無常。善男子!如十二因緣無定住處,若有住處,十二因緣不得名常。如來法身亦無住處,法界、法入、法陰、虛空,悉無住處。佛性亦爾,都無住處。善男子!譬如四大,力雖均等,有堅、有熱、有濕、有動,有重、有輕、有赤、有白、有黃、有黑,而是四大亦無有業,異法界故各不相似。佛性亦爾,異法界故,時至則現。善男子!一切眾生不退佛性故,名之為有,阿毘跋致故、以當有故、決定得故、定當見故,是故名為一切眾生悉有佛性。」
"Good son, when you say buddha-nature is like a magnet, this, I think, is not correct. Why is this? A stone does not, in truth, attract iron of its own accord at all — why is this? Because it possesses no mind and performs no action of its own. Good son, one thing arises because a different thing is present, and one thing perishes because that different thing is absent — there is, in truth, no fixed producer, and no fixed destroyer, at work at all. Good son, it is like a fierce fire, which does not, of itself, burn firewood — rather, the fire arises, and the firewood is destroyed, and this together is what is named 'burning firewood.' Good son, it is like the sunflower, which turns to follow the sun — and yet this sunflower possesses no reverent intention, no consciousness, and no action of its own at all; it is only because a different thing's own nature is present that it turns of itself. Good son, it is like the plantain tree, which grows in response to thunder — this tree possesses no ear, no mind, no intention, and no consciousness at all; it is only because a different thing is present that it grows, and only because that different thing is absent that it withers and dies. Good son, it is like the aśoka tree, whose flowers bloom forth when touched by a woman's own hand — this tree possesses no mind and no sense of touch at all; it is only because a different thing is present that its flowers emerge, and only because that different thing is absent that they wither and die. Good son, it is like the orange tree, whose fruit becomes abundant when it receives a corpse's own remains — and yet this orange tree possesses no mind and no sense of touch at all; it is only because a different thing is present that its fruit becomes abundant, and only because that different thing is absent that it withers away. Good son, it is like the pomegranate tree, whose fruit becomes lush and abundant through bone-meal and manure — and this pomegranate tree, too, possesses no mind and no sense of touch at all; it is only because a different thing is present that it arises, and only because that different thing is absent that it perishes. Good son, a magnet's attraction of iron is exactly the same: it is only because a different thing is present that this attraction arises, and only because that different thing is absent that it ceases. A being's own buddha-nature is exactly the same — it is not itself capable of 'attracting' unsurpassed, complete awakening at all. Good son, ignorance is not itself capable of 'attracting' formations, nor are formations themselves capable of 'attracting' consciousness — and yet it may still be said that ignorance conditions formations, and formations condition consciousness. Whether or not a buddha appears in the world, the Dharma-realm abides forever, unchanging. "Good son, should one say that buddha-nature dwells within beings — good son, a permanent dharma has no dwelling place at all; should it have a dwelling place, it would thereby be impermanent. Good son, it is like the twelve links of dependent origination, which have no fixed dwelling place at all — were they to have a fixed dwelling place, the twelve links could not be named permanent. The Tathāgata's own Dharma-body, likewise, has no dwelling place at all; the Dharma-realm, the Dharma sense-fields, the Dharma aggregates, and empty space — all are, without exception, without any dwelling place at all. Buddha-nature is exactly the same, entirely without any dwelling place at all. Good son, it is like the four great elements, whose own power, though equal, manifests as solidity, heat, moisture, and motion, and as heavy, light, red, white, yellow, and black — and yet these four elements themselves perform no action of their own at all; it is only because they belong to different classes of dharma that they each differ from one another. Buddha-nature is exactly the same: it is only because it belongs to a different class of dharma that it manifests once its own proper season arrives. Good son, it is because every being's own buddha-nature never retrogresses that it is named 'existent' — because it is avaivartika, because it is certain to come to be, because its attainment is decisive, and because its seeing is certain — it is for these very reasons that every being, without exception, is said to possess buddha-nature."
Huiyuan reads the five similes answering "why doesn't the path's own fault, or the sūtra's own fault, explain universal failure" — the physician, the donor, the sun, the river, the earth — as together isolating a single variable: in every case, the provision is genuinely complete and freely available, and the only thing that varies is the recipient's own response, which is exactly the diagnosis the sūtra gives directly afterward (affliction alone, not any deficiency in the Buddha, the Dharma, the path, or beings' own basic capacity, explains the failure). He then reads the magnet refutation as unfolding in two matched moves: first, a direct denial that a magnet attracts iron through any intention or action of its own at all (it has no mind, hence no "attracting" in the sense Lion's Roar's argument requires); and second, a positive account of what actually happens instead — "a different thing is present, and a different thing arises; a different thing is absent, and a different thing perishes" — where the fire-and-firewood pairing supplies the clearest illustration: fire doesn't "act on" firewood so much as fire's own arising and firewood's own destruction are simply two names for a single event with two conditions present together.
The five botanical examples that follow (the sunflower turning without any reverence, the plantain tree responding to thunder without any ear to hear it, the aśoka blooming at a touch it cannot feel, the orange and pomegranate fruiting through corpse-remains and bone-meal without any mind registering nourishment) are chosen specifically because each names a genuinely mindless object producing a response that looks, from outside, purposeful or reactive — exactly analogous to the mindless magnet's own "attraction" of iron, and, by direct extension, to buddha-nature's own dependence on cultivation without buddha-nature itself performing any act of drawing anything toward it. The chain of similes culminates in an explicit statement that even the twelve links of dependent origination — the paradigm case of one thing conditioning another — involve no fixed producer at all ("ignorance is not itself capable of 'attracting' formations... and yet it may still be said that ignorance conditions formations"), extending this fascicle's central point about buddha-nature into a claim about causation generally: dependent arising was never a story about one thing reaching out and pulling another into being, but about two things' mutual presence and absence tracking each other exactly.
The Blind Men and the Elephant
「善男子!譬如有王告一大臣,汝牽一象以示盲者。爾時大臣受王勅已,多集眾盲,以象示之。時彼眾盲各以手觸,大臣即還而白王言:『臣已示竟。』爾時大王即喚眾盲各各問言:『汝見象耶?』眾盲各言:『我已得見。』王言:『象為何類?』其觸牙者,即言象形如蘆菔根;其觸耳者,言象如箕;其觸頭者,言象如石;其觸鼻者,言象如杵;其觸脚者,言象如木臼;其觸脊者,言象如床;其觸腹者,言象如甕;其觸尾者,言象如繩。善男子!如彼眾盲,不說象體,亦非不說。若是眾相,悉非象者,離是之外,更無別象。善男子!王喻如來正遍知也,臣喻方等大涅槃經,象喻佛性,盲喻一切無明眾生。
"Good son, it is like a king who commanded one of his own great ministers: 'Lead an elephant here, and show it to some blind men.' This minister, having received the king's own command, gathered together a great many blind men, and showed the elephant to them. Each of these blind men then touched it with his own hands, and the minister returned and said to the king: 'I have already shown it to them, as you commanded.' The great king then summoned each of these blind men in turn, and asked them: 'Have you now seen the elephant?' Each of the blind men answered: 'I have already seen it.' The king said: 'What kind of thing, then, is an elephant?' The one who had touched its tusk said that an elephant's shape was like a radish root; the one who had touched its ear said it was like a winnowing basket; the one who had touched its head said it was like a stone; the one who had touched its trunk said it was like a pestle; the one who had touched its leg said it was like a wooden mortar; the one who had touched its back said it was like a bed; the one who had touched its belly said it was like a large jar; and the one who had touched its tail said it was like a rope. Good son, these blind men, though they did not truly describe the elephant's own actual body, cannot be said to have described nothing at all either. Were every one of these various descriptions entirely without any elephant in them at all, there would then be no elephant whatsoever apart from them — and yet there is. Good son, the king is a likeness for the Tathāgata, the perfectly, fully awakened one; the minister is a likeness for this very Vaipulya Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra; the elephant is a likeness for buddha-nature; and the blind men are a likeness for every being covered in ignorance.
「是諸眾生聞佛說已,或作是言:『色是佛性。何以故?是色雖滅,次第相續,是故獲得無上如來三十二相。如來色常,如來色者常不斷故,是故說色名為佛性。譬如真金,質雖遷變,色常不異,或時作釧,作鎞、作盤,然其黃色初無改易。眾生佛性亦復如是,質雖無常,而色是常,以是故說,色為佛性。』或有說言:『受是佛性。何以故?受因緣故,獲得如來真實之樂,如來受者謂畢竟受、第一義受。眾生受性雖復無常,然其次第相續不斷,是故獲得如來常受。譬如有人姓憍尸迦,人雖無常,而姓是常,經千萬世無有改易。眾生佛性亦復如是,以是故說受為佛性。』又有說言:『想是佛性。何以故?想因緣故,獲得如來真實之想。如來想者名無想想,無想想者非眾生想、非男女想,亦非色受想行識想、非想斷想,眾生之想雖復無常,以想次第相續不斷,故得如來常恒之想。善男子!譬如眾生十二因緣,眾生雖滅而因緣常。眾生佛性亦復如是,以是故說想為佛性。』又有說言:『行為佛性。何以故?行名壽命,壽因緣故,獲得如來常住壽命。眾生壽命雖復無常、而壽次第相續不斷,故得如來真實常壽。善男子!譬如十二部經,聽者、說者雖復無常,而是經典常存不變。眾生佛性亦復如是,以是故說,行為佛性。』又有說言:『識為佛性。識因緣故,獲得如來平等之心。眾生意識雖復無常,而識次第相續不斷,故得如來真實常心。如火熱性,火雖無常,熱非無常。眾生佛性亦復如是,以是故說識為佛性。』
"These beings, upon hearing the Buddha's teaching, may say among themselves: 'Form is itself buddha-nature. Why is this? Though this form perishes, it continues on, one form following another in unbroken succession, and it is through this that the unsurpassed thirty-two marks of the Tathāgata are finally attained. The Tathāgata's own form is permanent, and, because the Tathāgata's own form is forever unbroken, form is thus said to be named buddha-nature. It is like genuine gold, whose own substance may be reshaped, and yet whose color remains forever unchanged — at one time fashioned into a bracelet, at another into a hairpin, at another into a tray, and yet its own golden color is never altered in the least. A being's own buddha-nature is exactly the same: though its own substance is impermanent, its own color is permanent — it is for this very reason that form is said to be buddha-nature.' There are, further, those who say: 'Feeling is itself buddha-nature. Why is this? Through the cause and condition of feeling, one attains the Tathāgata's own true bliss — the Tathāgata's own feeling is named ultimate feeling, the feeling of the highest truth. A being's own feeling, though impermanent in its own nature, nonetheless continues on in unbroken succession, and it is through this that the Tathāgata's own permanent feeling is finally attained. It is like a man of the Kauśika clan-name — though the man himself is impermanent, his own clan-name remains permanent, unaltered across a thousand, ten thousand generations. A being's own buddha-nature is exactly the same — it is for this very reason that feeling is said to be buddha-nature.' There are, further, those who say: 'Perception is itself buddha-nature. Why is this? Through the cause and condition of perception, one attains the Tathāgata's own true perception — the Tathāgata's own perception is named the perception free of perception, and this perception free of perception is neither the perception of an ordinary being, nor the perception of male or female, nor the perception of form, feeling, perception, formations, or consciousness, nor even the perception of perception's own cessation. A being's own perception, though impermanent, continues on in unbroken succession, and it is through this that the Tathāgata's own ever-abiding perception is finally attained. Good son, it is like a being's own twelve links of dependent origination: though the being himself perishes, these very links remain permanent. A being's own buddha-nature is exactly the same — it is for this very reason that perception is said to be buddha-nature.' There are, further, those who say: 'Formations are themselves buddha-nature. Why is this? Formations are named as one's own lifespan, and, through the cause and condition of this lifespan, one attains the Tathāgata's own ever-abiding lifespan. A being's own lifespan, though impermanent, continues on in unbroken succession, and it is through this that the Tathāgata's own truly permanent lifespan is finally attained. Good son, it is like the twelve divisions of scripture: though the one who hears them and the one who teaches them are both impermanent, this very scripture endures forever, unchanging. A being's own buddha-nature is exactly the same — it is for this very reason that formations are said to be buddha-nature.' There are, further, those who say: 'Consciousness is itself buddha-nature. Through the cause and condition of consciousness, one attains the Tathāgata's own equal mind. A being's own mental consciousness, though impermanent, continues on in unbroken succession, and it is through this that the Tathāgata's own truly permanent mind is finally attained — it is like fire's own heat: though fire itself is impermanent, its heat is not impermanent. A being's own buddha-nature is exactly the same — it is for this very reason that consciousness is said to be buddha-nature.'
「又有說言:『離陰有我,我是佛性。何以故?我因緣故,獲得如來八自在我。有諸外道說言去來、見聞、悲喜,語說為我,如是我相雖復無常,而如來我真實是常。善男子!如陰入界雖復無常,而名是常,眾生佛性亦復如是。善男子!如彼盲人各各說象,雖不得實,非不說象。說佛性者亦復如是,非即六法、不離六法。善男子!是故我說眾生佛性,非色不離色,乃至非我,不離我。善男子!有諸外道雖說有我,而實無我。眾生我者,即是五陰,離陰之外更無別我。善男子!譬如莖葉、鬚臺合為蓮花,離是之外更無別花,眾生我者亦復如是。善男子!譬如牆壁、草木和合,名之為舍,離是之外,更無別舍。如佉陀羅樹、波羅奢樹、尼拘陀樹、欝曇鉢樹和合為林,離是之外更無別林。譬如車兵、象馬步兵和合為軍,離是之外更無別軍。譬如五色雜線和合,名之為綺,離是之外更無別綺。如四姓和合名為大眾,離是之外更無別眾。眾生我者亦復如是,離五陰外更無別我。善男子!如來常住,則名為我。如來法身無邊無礙,不生不滅,得八自在,是名為我。眾生真實無如是我及以我所,但以必定當得畢竟第一義空,故名佛性。』」
"There are, further, those who say: 'Apart from the aggregates, there is a self, and this self is itself buddha-nature. Why is this? Through the cause and condition of self, one attains the Tathāgata's own self, possessed of the eight kinds of mastery. There are non-Buddhist teachers who speak of coming and going, seeing and hearing, sorrow and joy, and speech itself, calling all of these "self" — and, though this very mark of self is impermanent, the Tathāgata's own self is truly permanent. Good son, it is like the aggregates, sense-fields, and elements, which, though impermanent, still bear a permanent name — a being's own buddha-nature is exactly the same.' Good son, it is like those blind men, each describing the elephant in his own way — though none of them grasped its true reality, none of them can be said to have described nothing at all. Speaking of buddha-nature is exactly the same: it is neither identical to these six dharmas, nor separate from these six dharmas. Good son, it is for this very reason that I teach that a being's own buddha-nature is not form, and yet is not separate from form — and, all the way through, is not self, and yet is not separate from self. Good son, there are non-Buddhist teachers who, though they speak of a self, in truth have no genuine self at all in mind. A being's own self is nothing other than the five aggregates themselves — apart from the aggregates, there is no separate self at all. Good son, it is like the stem, leaves, filaments, and receptacle, which together form a lotus flower — apart from these, there is no separate flower at all; a being's own self is exactly the same. Good son, it is like walls, grass, and wood, which, coming together, are named a house — apart from these, there is no separate house at all. It is like the khadira tree, the palāśa tree, the nyagrodha tree, and the udumbara tree, which, together, form a forest — apart from these, there is no separate forest at all. It is like chariots, elephants, cavalry, and infantry, which, together, form an army — apart from these, there is no separate army at all. It is like threads of five different colors woven together, named a piece of fine brocade — apart from these, there is no separate brocade at all. It is like the four castes, which, together, are named the great populace — apart from these, there is no separate populace at all. A being's own self is exactly the same — apart from the five aggregates, there is no separate self at all. Good son, the Tathāgata's own ever-abiding nature is what is truly named 'self.' The Tathāgata's own Dharma-body is boundless and unobstructed, neither arising nor ceasing, fully endowed with the eight kinds of mastery — this is what is named 'self.' Beings, in truth, possess no self, and nothing belonging to a self, of this kind at all — it is only because they are certain, in the end, to attain ultimate emptiness in the highest sense that this is named buddha-nature.'"
The elephant parable's own closing qualification — the blind men "did not describe the elephant's own actual body, and yet cannot be said to have described nothing at all" — is the interpretive key to everything that follows: each of the six identifications of buddha-nature with form, feeling, perception, formations, consciousness, or a self apart from the aggregates is partially right and partially wrong in exactly the same way a hand on the trunk is partially right about the elephant. Each identification follows an identical logical structure worth naming explicitly: some element of ordinary experience is impermanent in its everyday instances, yet exhibits a kind of continuity across change (form's succession of moments still yielding the thirty-two marks, a clan-name persisting across a thousand generations, a scripture outlasting every reader and speaker, heat remaining constant while the fire that carries it flickers) — and each identification then leaps from this "continuity within impermanence" to the further claim that this very continuity simply is buddha-nature, which is precisely the leap Part 27's fourteen-fold catechism already ruled out with its own insistence that buddha-nature is form and not-form, self and not-self, at once.
The sixth identification (self apart from the aggregates) receives the sūtra's most extended treatment because it is the position closest to the truth while still missing it: the seven similes of composite wholes (the lotus needing stem and leaves, the house needing wall and wood, the forest needing its four named tree species, the army needing its four divisions, brocade needing its five colors, the populace needing its four castes) all make the same point — there is no separate self floating free of the five aggregates, exactly as there is no separate flower floating free of stem and petal — while the Tathāgata's own self, defined instead as the boundless, unarising, unceasing Dharma-body possessed of the eight masteries, occupies an entirely different logical category from the composite self these similes rule out. The passage's own closing move — buddha-nature named not because beings already possess this permanent self now, but "because they are certain, in the end, to attain ultimate emptiness" — is this fascicle's own restatement, in the register of self-theory, of the same future-certainty framework Part 27 used to resolve the icchantika's claim to buddha-nature through the three times.
What Buddha-Nature Is Truly Called
「善男子!大慈大悲名為佛性。何以故?大慈大悲常隨菩薩,如影隨形,一切眾生必定當得大慈大悲,是故說言一切眾生悉有佛性。大慈大悲者名為佛性,佛性者名為如來。大喜大捨名為佛性。何以故?菩薩摩訶薩若不能捨二十五有,則不能得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。以諸眾生必當得故,是故說言一切眾生悉有佛性。大喜大捨者即是佛性,佛性者即是如來。「佛性者名大信心。何以故?以信心故,菩薩摩訶薩則能具足檀波羅蜜乃至般若波羅蜜。一切眾生必定當得大信心故,是故說言一切眾生悉有佛性。大信心者即是佛性,佛性者即是如來,佛性者名一子地。何以故?以一子地因緣故,菩薩則於一切眾生得平等心。一切眾生必定當得一子地故,是故說言一切眾生悉有佛性。一子地者即是佛性,佛性者即是如來。「佛性者名第四力。何以故?以第四力因緣故,菩薩則能教化眾生。一切眾生必定當得第四力故,是故說言一切眾生悉有佛性。第四力者即是佛性,佛性者即是如來。「佛性者名十二因緣。何以故?以因緣故,如來常住。一切眾生定有如是十二因緣,是故說言一切眾生悉有佛性。十二因緣即是佛性,佛性者即是如來。「佛性者名四無礙智。以四無礙因緣故說字義無礙,字義無礙故能化眾生。四無礙者即是佛性,佛性者即是如來。「佛性者名頂三昧,以修如是頂三昧故,則能總攝一切佛法,是故說言頂三昧者名為佛性。十住菩薩修是三昧未得具足,雖見佛性而不明了。一切眾生必定得故,是故說言一切眾生悉有佛性。「善男子,如上所說種種諸法,一切眾生定當得故,是故說言一切眾生悉有佛性。「善男子!我若說色是佛性者,眾生聞已則生邪倒,以邪倒故命終則生阿鼻地獄。如來說法為斷地獄,是故不說色是佛性,乃至說識亦復如是。「善男子!若有眾生了佛性者,則不須修道;十住菩薩修八聖道,少見佛性,況不修者而得見耶?善男子!如文殊師利諸菩薩等,已無量世修習聖道了知佛性,云何聲聞辟支佛等能知佛性?若諸眾生欲得了了知佛性者,應當一心受持讀誦、書寫解說、供養恭敬、尊重讚歎是涅槃經,見有受持乃至讚歎如是經者,應當以好房舍衣服飲食臥具病瘦醫藥而供給之,兼復讚歎禮拜問訊。善男子,若有已於過去無量無邊世中,親近供養無量諸佛深種善根,然後乃得聞是經名。善男子!佛性不可思議,佛、法、僧寶亦不可思議,一切眾生悉有佛性而不能知,是亦不可思議。如來常樂我淨之法亦不可思議,一切眾生能信如是大涅槃經亦不可思議。」
"Good son, great loving-kindness and great compassion are themselves named buddha-nature. Why is this? Great loving-kindness and great compassion forever follow the bodhisattva, exactly as a shadow follows a form, and every being, without exception, is certain, in the end, to attain great loving-kindness and great compassion — it is for this very reason that every being, without exception, is said to possess buddha-nature. Great loving-kindness and great compassion are themselves named buddha-nature, and buddha-nature is itself named the Tathāgata. Great sympathetic joy and great equanimity are themselves named buddha-nature. Why is this? Should a bodhisattva mahāsattva be unable to relinquish attachment to the twenty-five states of existence, he could never attain unsurpassed, complete awakening at all. Because every being is certain, in the end, to attain this very quality, it is for this very reason that every being, without exception, is said to possess buddha-nature. Great sympathetic joy and great equanimity are themselves buddha-nature, and buddha-nature is itself the Tathāgata. "Buddha-nature is named great faith. Why is this? Through faith, a bodhisattva mahāsattva is thereby able to fully complete the perfection of giving, all the way through to the perfection of wisdom. Because every being, without exception, is certain, in the end, to attain this great faith, it is for this very reason that every being, without exception, is said to possess buddha-nature. Great faith is itself buddha-nature, and buddha-nature is itself the Tathāgata. Buddha-nature is named the single-child stage. Why is this? Through the very cause and condition of the single-child stage, a bodhisattva thereby attains an equal mind toward every being, exactly as a parent regards an only child. Because every being, without exception, is certain, in the end, to attain this single-child stage, it is for this very reason that every being, without exception, is said to possess buddha-nature. The single-child stage is itself buddha-nature, and buddha-nature is itself the Tathāgata. "Buddha-nature is named the fourth power. Why is this? Through the very cause and condition of this fourth power, a bodhisattva is thereby able to teach and transform beings. Because every being, without exception, is certain, in the end, to attain this fourth power, it is for this very reason that every being, without exception, is said to possess buddha-nature. This fourth power is itself buddha-nature, and buddha-nature is itself the Tathāgata. "Buddha-nature is named the twelve links of dependent origination. Why is this? Through this very cause and condition, the Tathāgata abides forever. Every being, without exception, certainly possesses these very twelve links — it is for this very reason that every being, without exception, is said to possess buddha-nature. The twelve links of dependent origination are themselves buddha-nature, and buddha-nature is itself the Tathāgata. "Buddha-nature is named the four unobstructed knowledges. Through the very cause and condition of these four unobstructed knowledges, one is able to speak of word and meaning without any obstruction at all, and, being unobstructed in word and meaning, one is thereby able to teach and transform beings. These four unobstructed knowledges are themselves buddha-nature, and buddha-nature is itself the Tathāgata. "Buddha-nature is named the crown samādhi — through cultivating this very crown samādhi, one is thereby able to gather in the whole of the Buddha's own teaching entirely, and it is for this very reason that the crown samādhi is said to be named buddha-nature. The bodhisattva of the ten abidings, cultivating this very samādhi, has not yet fully completed it, and, though he sees buddha-nature, does not see it with complete clarity. Because every being, without exception, is certain, in the end, to attain it, it is for this very reason that every being, without exception, is said to possess buddha-nature. "Good son, every one of the various dharmas taught above — every being, without exception, is certain, in the end, to attain them, and it is for this very reason that every being, without exception, is said to possess buddha-nature. "Good son, were I to say directly that form itself is buddha-nature, beings, upon hearing this, would give rise to a wrong, inverted view, and, through this very wrong view, would, at the end of their own lives, fall into the Avīci hell. The Tathāgata teaches the Dharma in order to put an end to hell — it is for this very reason that I do not say that form itself is buddha-nature, and the same holds all the way through to consciousness as well. "Good son, should any being already fully understand buddha-nature, he would then have no need to cultivate the path at all — and yet the bodhisattva of the ten abidings, cultivating the eightfold noble path, sees only a little of buddha-nature — how much less, then, could one who does not cultivate it at all possibly see it? Good son, bodhisattvas such as Mañjuśrī have already, across immeasurable ages, cultivated the noble path and come to fully understand buddha-nature — how, then, could any śrāvaka or pratyekabuddha possibly know buddha-nature at all? Should any being wish to come to fully understand buddha-nature with complete clarity, he ought, with his whole mind, to uphold, recite, copy out, expound, make offerings to, honor, revere, and praise this very Nirvāṇa Sūtra; and, upon seeing anyone who upholds it, all the way through to praising it, he ought to provide him with fine lodging, clothing, food and drink, bedding, and medicine for illness, and, further, praise him, bow to him, and greet him with respect. Good son, it is only one who has, across immeasurable, boundless ages in the past, drawn close to and made offerings to immeasurable buddhas, deeply planting wholesome roots, who is then able to hear even the mere name of this very sūtra. Good son, buddha-nature is inconceivable; the jewels of the Buddha, the Dharma, and the Saṅgha are, likewise, inconceivable; that every being, without exception, possesses buddha-nature, and yet is unable to know it, is, likewise, inconceivable; the Tathāgata's own dharma of permanence, bliss, self, and purity is, likewise, inconceivable; and that any being at all is able to believe in this very Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra is, likewise, inconceivable."
師子吼菩薩言:「世尊!如佛所說,一切眾生能信如是大涅槃經不可思議者。世尊!是大眾中有八萬五千億人,於是經中不生信心,是故有能信是經者,名不可思議。」「善男子!如是諸人於未來世亦當定得信是經典,見於佛性,得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。」
Lion's Roar Bodhisattva said: "World-Honored One, as the Buddha has taught, that any being at all is able to believe in this very Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra is inconceivable. World-Honored One, within this very great assembly, there are eighty-five thousand koṭis of people who have not yet given rise to any faith in this very sūtra at all — it is for this very reason that whoever is able to believe in this sūtra may indeed be named inconceivable." "Good son, these very people, too, shall, in a future age, certainly come to believe in this very scripture, see buddha-nature, and attain unsurpassed, complete awakening."
This catalogue of positive identifications (great compassion, great joy and equanimity, great faith, the single-child stage, the fourth power, the twelve links, the four unobstructed knowledges, the crown samādhi) shares a single justifying formula repeated word for word each time — "because every being is certain, in the end, to attain it" — which quietly resolves the tension between the elephant parable's own six rejected identifications and this passage's own seemingly parallel list: the earlier six failed because they identified buddha-nature with something merely continuous across change (a color, a name, a heat), while this list identifies buddha-nature with qualities the Buddha explicitly possesses now and every being is certain to possess eventually, making future attainment rather than persistent continuity the actual warrant. The explicit refusal to say directly "form is buddha-nature" — for fear of producing exactly the wrong, reifying view the elephant parable just diagnosed, one severe enough to lead to hell — retroactively explains why the six rejected identifications were framed as things "beings say," never as the Buddha's own direct teaching: the sūtra is dramatizing the very mistake it warns against, letting the reader watch it happen before naming why it must be avoided.
The closing exchange about the eighty-five thousand koṭis of unconvinced listeners, still present within the very assembly hearing this teaching, gives the fascicle's abstract inconceivability-language its most concrete demonstration: the sūtra does not merely assert that faith in itself is remarkable, it points to visible proof of the claim's difficulty, sitting in the audience at that very moment — and the Buddha's own answer, that these same people will certainly come to believe in a future age, extends this entire chapter's future-certainty framework for buddha-nature (already used for the icchantika in Part 27 and for self in this fascicle's own elephant-parable close) to something as ordinary and human as an audience's own present skepticism.
How a Bodhisattva Knows His Own Non-Retrogression
師子吼言:「世尊!云何不退菩薩自知決定有不退心?」佛言:「善男子!菩薩摩訶薩當以苦行自試其心,日食一胡麻,經一七日,粳米、菉豆、麻子、粟[麾-毛+黍]及以白豆,亦復如是各一七日。食一麻時,作是思惟:『如是苦行,都無利益。無利益事,尚能為之,況有利益而當不作?於無利益心能堪忍不退不轉,是故定得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。』如是等日修苦行時,一切皮肉消瘦、皺減,如斷生瓠,置之日中,其目欠陷,如井底星,肉盡肋出,如朽草屋,脊骨連現如重線塼,所坐之處如馬蹄跡。欲坐則伏,欲起則偃,雖受如是無利益苦,然不退於菩提之心。「復次善男子!菩薩摩訶薩為破眾苦、施安樂故,乃至能捨內外財物及其身命,如棄芻草。若能不惜是身命者,如是菩薩自知必定有不退心,我定當得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。「復次菩薩為法因緣,剜身為燈,㲲纏皮肉,蘇油灌之,燒以為炷。菩薩爾時受是大苦,自呵其心而作是言:『如是苦者,於地獄苦,百千萬分未是一分。汝於無量百千劫中受大苦惱都無利益,汝若不能受是輕苦,云何而能於地獄中救苦眾生?』菩薩摩訶薩作是觀時,身不覺苦,其心不退不動不轉。菩薩爾時應深自知,我定當得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。善男子!菩薩爾時具足煩惱未有斷者,為法因緣,能以頭目、髓腦、手足、血肉施於眾生,以釘釘身,投巖赴火。菩薩爾時雖受如是無量眾苦,若心不退不動不轉,菩薩當知我今定有不退之心,當得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。」
Lion's Roar said: "World-Honored One, how does a non-retrogressing bodhisattva come to know for himself, with certainty, that he possesses a mind that will never retrogress?" The Buddha said: "Good son, a bodhisattva mahāsattva ought to test his own mind through austerity: eating but a single sesame seed each day, for a full seven days, and then a single grain of rice, a single mung bean, a single flax seed, a single grain of millet, and a single white bean, each in turn, for a full seven days apiece. While eating but a single sesame seed, he reflects in this way: 'An austerity of this kind brings no benefit at all. If I am already able to perform something that brings no benefit at all, how much more, then, ought I to perform something that truly does bring benefit? Since I am able to endure this benefit-less exertion without ever retrogressing or wavering, I am therefore certain to attain unsurpassed, complete awakening.' As he cultivates austerity of this kind, day after day, all his own skin and flesh grow gaunt and wasted, wrinkled and shrunken, exactly like a fresh gourd cut open and left out in the sun; his own eyes grow sunken and hollow, exactly like stars glimpsed from the bottom of a well; his flesh is entirely exhausted, his ribs protruding, exactly like a decaying, thatched hut; his spine stands out in a row, exactly like a heavy string of bricks; and the very place where he sits bears an impression like a horse's own hoofprint. Wishing to sit, he collapses; wishing to rise, he falls back down — and yet, though he undergoes suffering of exactly this benefit-less kind, his own mind never retrogresses from bodhi. "Furthermore, good son, a bodhisattva mahāsattva, for the sake of destroying every suffering and bestowing peace and happiness, is able to relinquish even his own internal and external wealth, and even his own body and life, exactly as one casts aside a blade of grass. Should he be able to hold his own body and life this lightly, a bodhisattva of exactly this kind knows for himself, with certainty, that he possesses a mind that will never retrogress, thinking: 'I am certain to attain unsurpassed, complete awakening.' "Furthermore, a bodhisattva, for the sake of the Dharma, carves out a hollow in his own body to serve as a lamp, wraps his own skin and flesh with cotton cloth, pours in butter oil, and lights it as a wick. The bodhisattva, at that time, undergoes this very great suffering, and, reproaching his own mind, says: 'Suffering of exactly this kind is not even a single part in a hundred thousand, ten thousand parts of the suffering of hell. Should you undergo this very great suffering across immeasurable hundreds of thousands of kalpas without any benefit at all, and yet be unable to endure even this slight suffering here, how, then, could you ever rescue suffering beings within hell itself?' When a bodhisattva mahāsattva contemplates in exactly this way, his own body feels no suffering at all, and his own mind neither retrogresses, nor wavers, nor is shaken. A bodhisattva, at exactly such a time, ought to know deeply, for himself: 'I am certain to attain unsurpassed, complete awakening.' Good son, a bodhisattva, at that time, though still fully endowed with affliction not yet severed, is, for the sake of the Dharma, able to give his own head, eyes, marrow, brain, hands, feet, blood, and flesh to beings, to be driven through with nails, to be cast from a cliff, or to be thrown into fire. A bodhisattva, at that time, though he undergoes suffering of exactly this immeasurable kind, if his own mind neither retrogresses, nor wavers, nor is shaken, a bodhisattva ought to know: 'I now certainly possess a mind that will never retrogress, and shall certainly attain unsurpassed, complete awakening.'"
「善男子!菩薩摩訶薩為破一切眾生苦惱,願作麁大畜生之身,以身血肉施於眾生,眾生取時復生憐愍,菩薩爾時閉氣不喘,示作死相,令彼取者不生殺害疑網之想。菩薩雖受畜生之身,終不造作畜生之業。何以故?善男子!菩薩既得不退心已,終不造作三惡道業。菩薩摩訶薩若未來世有微塵等惡業果報不定受者,以大願力為眾生故而悉受之。譬如病人,為鬼所著,藏隱身中,以呪力故,即時相現,或語或喜、或瞋或罵、或啼或哭。菩薩摩訶薩未來之世三惡道業亦復如是,菩薩摩訶薩受熊身時,常為眾生演說正法。或受迦賓闍羅鳥身,為諸眾生說正法。故受瞿陀身、鹿身、兔身、象身、羖羊身、獼猴、白鴿、金翅鳥、龍蛇之身,受如是等畜生身時,終不造作畜生惡業,常為其餘畜生、眾生,演說正法,令彼聞法速得轉離畜生身故。菩薩爾時雖受畜生身不作惡業,當知必定有不退心。「菩薩摩訶薩於飢饉世見餓眾生,作龜魚身無量由延,復作是願:『願諸眾生取我肉時,隨取隨生,因食我肉離飢渴苦,一切悉發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心。』菩薩發願:『若有因我離飢渴者,未來之世,速得遠離二十五有飢渴之患。』菩薩摩訶薩受如是苦,心不退者,當知必定得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。」
"Good son, a bodhisattva mahāsattva, for the sake of destroying every being's own suffering and affliction, vows to take on the coarse, great body of an animal, giving his own blood and flesh to beings — and, when beings take from it, he gives rise to compassion for them even then, holding his own breath so as not to gasp, feigning the appearance of death, so that those who take from him give rise to no doubt or hesitation about committing killing. Though the bodhisattva undergoes an animal's own body, he never, in the end, commits an animal's own karmic action. Why is this? Good son, once a bodhisattva has already attained a mind that never retrogresses, he never, in the end, commits any karmic action belonging to the three evil destinies at all. Should a bodhisattva mahāsattva, in some future age, have even the slightest, dust-mote's worth of evil karmic fruit that is not certain to be experienced, he, through the power of his own great vow, receives it entirely, for the sake of beings. It is like a sick person possessed by a spirit, this spirit hidden within his own body — through the power of an incantation, it is made to manifest at once, speaking, rejoicing, growing angry, cursing, weeping, or crying out. A bodhisattva mahāsattva's own karma belonging to the three evil destinies, in future ages, is exactly the same. When a bodhisattva mahāsattva takes on the body of a bear, he forever expounds the true Dharma for the sake of beings. Or, taking on the body of a kapiñjala bird, he expounds the true Dharma for the sake of beings. And so, taking on the body of a bull, a deer, a hare, an elephant, a ram, a monkey, a white dove, a garuḍa, or a nāga serpent — when he takes on animal bodies of exactly this kind, he never, in the end, commits any evil karmic action belonging to an animal at all, but forever expounds the true Dharma for the sake of every other animal and being, so that they, upon hearing the Dharma, may swiftly come to be freed from their own animal bodies. A bodhisattva, at that time, though he takes on an animal's own body, commits no evil karma at all — one should therefore know that he certainly possesses a mind that will never retrogress. "A bodhisattva mahāsattva, in an age of famine, seeing starving beings, takes on the body of a turtle or a fish, immeasurable yojanas in size, and further makes this very vow: 'May every being, taking from my own flesh, find it renewed as quickly as it is taken, and, through eating my own flesh, be freed from the suffering of hunger and thirst, and may every one of them give rise to the mind of unsurpassed, complete awakening.' The bodhisattva makes this vow: 'Should any being, through me, be freed from hunger and thirst, may he, in a future age, swiftly come to be freed forever from the affliction of hunger and thirst throughout all twenty-five states of existence.' Should a bodhisattva mahāsattva undergo suffering of exactly this kind, his own mind never retrogressing, one should know that he is certain to attain unsurpassed, complete awakening."
「復次菩薩於疾疫世見病苦者,作是思惟:『如藥樹王,若有病者,取根取莖、取枝取葉、取花取果、取皮取膚悉得愈病,願我此身亦復如是,若有病者,聞聲、觸身、服食血肉乃至骨髓,病悉除愈;願諸眾生食我肉時,不生惡心如食子肉;我治病已,常為說法,願彼信受,思惟轉教。』復次善男子!菩薩具足煩惱雖受身苦,其心不退不動不轉,當知必定得不退心,成阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。「復次善男子!若有眾生為鬼所病,菩薩見已即作是言:『願作鬼身、大身、健身、多眷屬身,使彼聞見病得除愈。』菩薩摩訶薩為眾生故勤修苦行,雖有煩惱,不污其心。「復次善男子!菩薩摩訶薩雖復修行六波羅蜜,亦不求於六波羅蜜果。修行無上六波羅蜜時,作是願言:『我今以此六波羅蜜施一切眾生,一一眾生受我施已,悉令得成阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,我亦自為六波羅蜜勤修苦行、受諸苦惱,當受苦時,願我不退菩提之心。』善男子!菩薩摩訶薩作是願時,是名不退菩提之相。「復次善男子!菩薩摩訶薩不可思議。何以故?菩薩摩訶薩深知生死多諸罪過,觀大涅槃有大功德,為諸眾生處在生死、受種種苦,心無退轉,是名菩薩不可思議。復次善男子!菩薩摩訶薩無有因緣而生憐愍,實不受恩而常施恩,雖施於恩而不求報,是故復名不可思議。復次善男子!或有眾生為自利益修諸苦行,菩薩摩訶薩為利他故修行苦行,是名自利,是故復名不可思議。「復次菩薩具足煩惱,為壞怨親所受諸苦,修平等心,是故復名不可思議。復次菩薩若見諸惡不善眾生,若訶責、若軟語、若驅擯、若捨之,有惡性者現為軟語,有憍慢者現為大慢,而其內心實無憍慢,是名菩薩方便不可思議。復次菩薩具足煩惱少財物時,而求者多,心不迮小,是名菩薩不可思議。復次菩薩於佛出時,知佛功德,為眾生故,於無佛處受邊地身,如盲如聾、如跛如躄,是名菩薩不可思議。復次菩薩深知眾生所有罪過,為度脫故常與共行,雖隨其意罪垢不污,是故復名不可思議。「復次菩薩了了知見,無眾生相、無煩惱污、無修習道離煩惱者,雖為菩提無菩提行,亦無成就菩提行者,無有受苦及破苦者,而亦能為眾生壞苦行菩提行,是故復名不可思議。」
"Furthermore, a bodhisattva, in an age of plague and pestilence, seeing beings suffering illness, reflects in this way: 'It is like the king of medicinal trees: should there be a sick person, taking its root, its stem, its branch, its leaf, its flower, its fruit, its bark, or its skin, he is entirely cured of his illness — may this very body of mine be exactly the same: should there be a sick person, upon merely hearing my voice, touching my body, or consuming my blood and flesh, all the way down to my marrow, may his illness be entirely cured; and may every being, when eating my own flesh, give rise to no ill will at all, exactly as though eating the flesh of his own child; and, once I have cured his illness, may I forever teach the Dharma for him, and may he receive it with faith, reflect upon it, and, in turn, teach it to others.' Furthermore, good son, though a bodhisattva, still fully endowed with affliction, undergoes bodily suffering, his own mind neither retrogresses, nor wavers, nor is shaken — one should know that he is certain to attain a mind that never retrogresses, and to accomplish unsurpassed, complete awakening. "Furthermore, good son, should any being suffer illness caused by a spirit, a bodhisattva, seeing this, at once makes this very statement: 'May I take on the body of a spirit, a great body, a mighty body, a body with a great retinue, so that this being, upon merely hearing of me or seeing me, may be cured of his illness.' A bodhisattva mahāsattva diligently cultivates austerity for the sake of beings, and, though affliction is present, it never defiles his own mind. "Furthermore, good son, though a bodhisattva mahāsattva cultivates the practice of the six perfections, he does not seek the fruit of the six perfections for himself at all. While cultivating the unsurpassed six perfections, he makes this very vow: 'I now give these very six perfections to every being — and may every single being, upon receiving my own gift, come to accomplish unsurpassed, complete awakening; and may I myself, for the sake of these six perfections, diligently cultivate austerity and undergo every kind of suffering and affliction, and, at the very moment I undergo this suffering, may my own bodhi-mind never retrogress.' Good son, when a bodhisattva mahāsattva makes a vow of exactly this kind, this is named the very mark of a bodhi-mind that never retrogresses. "Furthermore, good son, a bodhisattva mahāsattva is inconceivable. Why is this? A bodhisattva mahāsattva knows deeply that birth-and-death is full of every kind of fault, and observes that the great nirvāṇa possesses great merit — and yet, for the sake of every being, he remains within birth-and-death, undergoing every kind of suffering, his mind never retrogressing — this is named the bodhisattva's own inconceivability. Furthermore, good son, a bodhisattva mahāsattva gives rise to compassion without any prior cause or condition at all, and, though he truly receives no kindness from beings at all, he forever bestows kindness upon them, and, though he bestows this kindness, he seeks no repayment for it at all — it is for this very reason that he is, further, named inconceivable. Furthermore, good son, there are beings who cultivate austerity for their own benefit alone — a bodhisattva mahāsattva cultivates austerity for the benefit of others, and this itself is named his own true self-benefit — it is for this very reason that he is, further, named inconceivable. "Furthermore, a bodhisattva, though still fully endowed with affliction, cultivates an equal mind toward every suffering he undergoes, whether at the hands of friend or foe, in order to destroy the very distinction between them — it is for this very reason that he is, further, named inconceivable. Furthermore, a bodhisattva, upon seeing evil, unwholesome beings, whether he rebukes them, speaks gently to them, drives them away, or abandons them — should one be evil by nature, he manifests gentle speech toward him; should one be arrogant, he manifests great arrogance in turn — and yet his own inner mind, in truth, holds no arrogance at all — this is named the bodhisattva's own inconceivable skillful means. Furthermore, a bodhisattva, though still fully endowed with affliction, when he possesses but little wealth while many come seeking his help, his own mind never grows narrow or constricted — this is named the bodhisattva's own inconceivability. Furthermore, a bodhisattva, at a time when a buddha has already appeared in the world, knowing the Buddha's own merit, nonetheless takes on, for the sake of beings, a body born in a place without any buddha at all, in some border region, as one blind, deaf, lame, or crippled — this is named the bodhisattva's own inconceivability. Furthermore, a bodhisattva knows deeply every fault and transgression a being possesses, and, for the sake of delivering him, forever accompanies him — and, though he follows this being's own intentions, he is never stained by that being's own defiling transgressions at all — it is for this very reason that he is, further, named inconceivable. "Furthermore, a bodhisattva knows and sees with complete clarity that there is no mark of any being at all, no defilement by any affliction at all, and no cultivation of any path that departs from affliction at all — and yet, though there is, in this sense, no bodhi to be sought and no conduct of bodhi at all, and no one who accomplishes the conduct of bodhi, and no one who undergoes suffering and no one who destroys suffering — he is nonetheless still able, for the sake of beings, to perform the very austerities and conduct of bodhi that destroy suffering — it is for this very reason that he is, further, named inconceivable."
The graduated series of self-tests (the seven-fold week-by-week starvation fast, willingness to relinquish wealth and body "like grass," the lamp-body austerity, and finally offering head, eyes, marrow, and flesh outright) is structured as an ascending scale of stakes, each one explicitly framed not as an end in itself but as a diagnostic — the bodhisattva does not undergo suffering to earn merit directly, but to discover empirically whether his own resolve holds under pressure, with the discovery itself ("my mind did not retrogress") serving as the actual proof of non-retrogression. The animal-body vows extend the "freely chosen, not karmically earned" framework from Part 31 into an even more startling register: not merely accepting suffering personally, but offering one's own body as literal food while feigning death so the recipient feels no guilt — the passage is explicit that "though the bodhisattva undergoes an animal's own body, he never commits an animal's own karmic action," making the physical form and the moral status of the act come entirely apart.
The catalogue of "inconceivable" bodhisattva qualities that closes this section is worth reading as a systematic inventory of paradoxes this entire chapter has built toward: compassion without any prior relationship to justify it, kindness given with no expectation of return, austerity performed for others' benefit named as one's own true self-interest, gentleness and apparent arrogance both deployed as skillful means without either touching the bodhisattva's actual inner state, and — in the final, most philosophically loaded item — a bodhisattva who has already seen with complete clarity that there is no fixed being, no real affliction to be cleansed, and no genuine path apart from affliction to walk, and who nonetheless continues to perform the very conduct that "destroys suffering" as though all of this were real. This last paradox directly answers, in the register of the bodhisattva's own lived practice, the theoretical question the entire chapter opened with in Part 27: buddha-nature and ultimate emptiness were identified as the middle way from the very start, and here that identification cashes out as a mode of action that operates fully within apparent reality while never mistaking that reality for something fixed or final.
Descending From Tuṣita, and the Ocean's Eight Wonders
「復次菩薩受後邊身,處兜率天,是亦名為不可思議。何以故?兜率陀天,欲界中勝,在下天者其心放逸,在上天者諸根闇鈍,是故名勝。修施修戒,得上下身;修施戒定,得兜率身。一切菩薩毀呰諸有、破壞諸有,終不造作兜率天業,受彼天身。何以故?菩薩若處其餘諸有,亦能教化成就眾生,實無欲心而生欲界,是故復名不可思議。菩薩摩訶薩生兜率天,有三事勝:一者命、二者色、三者名。菩薩摩訶薩實不求於命、色、名稱,雖無求心而所得勝。菩薩摩訶薩深樂涅槃,然有因緣亦勝,是故復名不可思議。菩薩摩訶薩如是三事雖勝諸天,而諸天等於菩薩所,終不生於瞋心、妬心、憍慢之心,常生喜心,菩薩於天亦不憍慢,是故復名不可思議。菩薩摩訶薩不造命業,而於彼天畢竟壽命,是名命勝。亦無色業,而妙色身光明遍滿,是名色勝。菩薩摩訶薩處彼天宮,不樂五欲,唯為法事,是故名稱充滿十方,是名名勝。是故復名不可思議。「菩薩摩訶薩下兜率天,是時大地六種震動,是故復名不可思議。何以故?菩薩下時,欲色諸天悉來侍送,發大音聲讚歎菩薩,以口風氣故令地動。復有菩薩人中象王,人中象王名為龍王,龍王初入胎時,有諸龍王在此地下或怖、或喜,是故大地六種震動,是故復名不可思議。「菩薩摩訶薩知入胎時、住時、出時、知父、知母,不淨不污,如帝釋髻青色寶珠,是故復名不可思議。
"Furthermore, a bodhisattva who receives his very last body dwells within the Tuṣita heaven, and this, too, is named inconceivable. Why is this? The Tuṣita heaven is the most excellent among the heavens of the desire realm — those in the heavens below it are of too heedless a mind, and those in the heavens above it are of too dull and dim a faculty, and it is for this very reason that Tuṣita alone is named excellent. Through cultivating giving and precept-keeping, one attains a body in a lower or higher heaven; through cultivating giving, precept-keeping, and concentration together, one attains a body in Tuṣita itself. Yet every bodhisattva censures and denounces every state of existence, seeking to destroy every state of existence entirely — and yet he never, in the end, actually performs the very karmic action that produces a Tuṣita body, and receives that heavenly body regardless. Why is this? Because a bodhisattva, even should he dwell within any other state of existence, is equally able to teach and transform beings there — he is truly without any desire at all, and yet is born within the desire realm regardless — it is for this very reason that he is, further, named inconceivable. A bodhisattva mahāsattva born in the Tuṣita heaven possesses three superior things: life, form, and name. A bodhisattva mahāsattva, in truth, seeks none of these three — life, form, or renown — at all, and yet, though he has no mind that seeks them, what he attains nonetheless surpasses all others. A bodhisattva mahāsattva delights deeply in nirvāṇa, and yet, through this very cause and condition, still surpasses all others — it is for this very reason that he is, further, named inconceivable. A bodhisattva mahāsattva, though these three things surpass every god's own, is never, on this account, met with anger, envy, or arrogance from any of these very gods — they forever give rise to joy toward him instead, and the bodhisattva, likewise, holds no arrogance at all toward these gods — it is for this very reason that he is, further, named inconceivable. A bodhisattva mahāsattva performs no karmic action at all that would produce a fixed lifespan, and yet, within that heaven, attains a lifespan lasting to its very completion — this is named the superiority of his life. He likewise performs no karmic action that would produce a fine form, and yet his own wondrous, radiant body fills that realm with light — this is named the superiority of his form. A bodhisattva mahāsattva, dwelling within that heavenly palace, takes no delight at all in the five desires, but occupies himself solely with matters of the Dharma — and it is for this very reason that his own renown fills all ten directions — this is named the superiority of his name. It is for this very reason that he is, further, named inconceivable. "When a bodhisattva mahāsattva descends from the Tuṣita heaven, the great earth, at that very moment, shakes in six ways — and this, too, is named inconceivable. Why is this? At the very moment the bodhisattva descends, every god of the desire and form realms comes to attend and escort him, giving forth a great sound in praise of the bodhisattva, and it is the very breath and wind of their own voices that causes the earth to shake. There is, further, the bodhisattva who is himself the elephant-king among humans, and this very elephant-king among humans is named the nāga-king — and, at the very moment this nāga-king first enters the womb, every other nāga-king dwelling beneath this earth is filled, some with terror, and some with joy — and it is for this very reason that the great earth shakes in six ways. This, too, is named inconceivable. "A bodhisattva mahāsattva knows the very moment of entering the womb, the moment of dwelling within it, and the moment of emerging from it, and knows his own father and mother, and yet remains entirely undefiled and unstained throughout, exactly like the blue jewel set within Indra's own crown. This, too, is named inconceivable.
「善男子!大涅槃經亦復如是,不可思議。善男子!譬如大海,有八不思議。何等為八?一者漸漸轉深、二者深難得底、三者同一醎味、四者潮不過限、五者有種種寶藏、六者大身眾生在中居住、七者不宿死尸、八者一切萬流大雨投之不增不減。善男子!漸漸轉深有三事。何等三?一者眾生福力、二者順風而行、三者河水入故,乃至不增不減亦各有三。「是大涅槃微妙經典亦復如是,有八不思議:一者漸漸深。所謂優婆塞戒、沙彌戒、比丘戒、菩薩戒,須陀洹果、斯陀含果、阿那含果、阿羅漢果、辟支佛果、菩薩果、阿耨多羅三藐三菩提果,是涅槃經說如是等法,是名漸漸深,是故此經名漸漸深。「二者深難得底。如來世尊不生不滅,不得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,不轉法輪,不食不受,不行惠施,是故名為常樂我淨。一切眾生悉有佛性,佛性非色不離於色,非受想行識乃至不離於識,是常可見,了因非作因。須陀洹乃至辟支佛當得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,亦無煩惱,亦無住處,雖無煩惱不名為常,是故名深。復有甚深,於是經中或時說我、或說無我,或時說常、或說無常,或時說淨、或說不淨,或時說樂、或時說苦,或時說空、或說不空,或說一切有、或說一切無,或說三乘、或說一乘,或說五陰即是佛性、金剛三昧及以中道、首楞嚴三昧、十二因緣、第一義空、慈悲平等,於諸眾生頂智信心,知諸根力,一切法中無罣礙智,雖有佛性不說決定,是故名深。「三者一味。一切眾生同有佛性,皆同一乘、同一解脫、一因、一果、同一甘露,一切當得常樂我淨,是名一味。「四者潮不過限。如是經中制諸比丘,不得受畜八不淨物。若我弟子有能受持讀誦書寫解說分別是大涅槃微妙經典,寧失身命終不犯之,是名潮不過限。「五者有種種寶藏。是經即是無量寶藏。所言寶者,謂四念處、四正勤、四如意分、五根、五力、七覺分、八聖道分,嬰兒行、聖行、梵行、天行,諸善方便、眾生佛性、菩薩功德、如來功德、聲聞功德、緣覺功德、六波羅蜜、無量三昧、無量智慧,是名寶藏。「六者大身眾生所居住處。大身眾生者謂佛菩薩,大智慧故名大眾生,大身故、大心故、大莊嚴故、大調伏故、大方便故、大說法故、大勢力故、大徒眾故、大神通故、大慈悲故、常不變故、一切眾生無罣礙故、容受一切諸眾生故,是名大身眾生所居之處。「七者不宿死尸。死尸者,謂一闡提、犯四重禁、五無間罪、誹謗方等,非法說法、法說非法,受畜八種不淨之物,佛物、僧物隨意而用,或於比丘、比丘尼所作非法事,是名死尸。是涅槃經離如是等,是故名為不宿死尸。「八者不增不減。無邊際故、無始終故、非色故、非作故、常住故、不生滅故、一切眾生悉平等故、一切法性同一性故,是名無增減,是故此經如彼大海有八不思議。」
"Good son, this Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra, too, is exactly the same, inconceivable. Good son, it is like the great ocean, which possesses eight inconceivable qualities. What are these eight? First, it gradually grows ever deeper; second, its depth is so great that its own bottom can hardly be reached; third, it shares one and the same salty taste throughout; fourth, its tide never exceeds its own proper limit; fifth, it contains every kind of treasure; sixth, beings of great size dwell within it; seventh, it never harbors a dead body; and eighth, though every river and every great rain pours into it, it neither increases nor decreases. Good son, its gradual deepening has three causes. What are these three? First, beings' own merit and power; second, its own flowing in accord with the wind; and third, the rivers that flow into it — and, likewise, all the way through to its neither increasing nor decreasing, each of these eight qualities, too, has its own three causes. "This subtle and wondrous scripture of the great nirvāṇa is exactly the same, possessing eight inconceivable qualities. First, it grows gradually deeper. Namely: the precepts of the lay follower, the novice, the monk, and the bodhisattva; and the fruits of stream-entry, once-return, non-return, arhatship, the pratyekabuddha, the bodhisattva, and unsurpassed, complete awakening — this Nirvāṇa Sūtra teaches dharmas of exactly this kind, and it is for this very reason that it is named 'gradually deeper.' "Second, its depth is so great that its own bottom can hardly be reached. The Tathāgata, the World-Honored One, neither arises nor ceases, neither attains unsurpassed, complete awakening, nor turns the wheel of the Dharma, neither eats nor receives anything, nor performs any act of generous giving — and it is for this very reason that he is named possessing permanence, bliss, self, and purity. Every being, without exception, possesses buddha-nature — and buddha-nature is not form, and yet is not separate from form; and, all the way through, is not consciousness, and yet is not separate from consciousness — it is permanent and can be seen, and is a revealing cause, not a generative cause. The stream-enterer, all the way up to the pratyekabuddha, shall attain unsurpassed, complete awakening, and yet, at present, possesses no affliction and no dwelling-place at all — and yet, though he is free of affliction, this does not yet make him permanent — it is for this very reason that this is named 'deep.' There is, further, a still deeper depth: within this very sūtra, self is taught at one time, and no-self at another; permanence at one time, and impermanence at another; purity at one time, and impurity at another; bliss at one time, and suffering at another; emptiness at one time, and non-emptiness at another; the existence of everything at one time, and the non-existence of everything at another; the three vehicles at one time, and the one vehicle at another; that the five aggregates are themselves buddha-nature, the vajra samādhi, and the middle way; the Śūraṅgama samādhi, the twelve links of dependent origination, ultimate emptiness in the highest sense, and equal loving-kindness and compassion; the crown-wisdom and faith belonging to every being; knowledge of every faculty's own power; and unobstructed knowledge within every dharma — and yet, though buddha-nature is thus taught, no single, fixed formulation of it is ever given as final — it is for this very reason that this is named 'deep.' "Third, it shares one and the same taste throughout. Every being, without exception, shares the very same buddha-nature, the very same single vehicle, the very same liberation, the very same cause, the very same fruit, and the very same ambrosia — every being, without exception, shall attain permanence, bliss, self, and purity — this is named 'one taste.' "Fourth, its tide never exceeds its own proper limit. Within this very sūtra, every monk is forbidden from accepting and keeping any of the eight kinds of impure object. Should any of my own disciples be able to uphold, recite, copy out, expound, and distinctly explain this very subtle and wondrous scripture of the great nirvāṇa, he ought rather to lose his own body and life than ever once violate this rule — this is named 'the tide never exceeding its own limit.' "Fifth, it contains every kind of treasure. This very sūtra is itself an immeasurable treasury. What is meant by this treasure is the four foundations of mindfulness, the four right exertions, the four bases of supernatural power, the five faculties, the five powers, the seven factors of awakening, the eightfold noble path, infant-like conduct, noble conduct, pure conduct, and heavenly conduct, every kind of skillful means, every being's own buddha-nature, the merit of the bodhisattva, the merit of the Tathāgata, the merit of the śrāvaka, the merit of the pratyekabuddha, the six perfections, immeasurable samādhis, and immeasurable wisdom — this is named its treasury. "Sixth, it is the dwelling-place of beings of great size. Beings of great size are the buddhas and bodhisattvas — named great beings on account of their great wisdom, their great body, their great mind, their great adornment, their great taming power, their great skillful means, their great teaching of the Dharma, their great strength, their great retinue, their great supernatural power, their great loving-kindness and compassion, their forever unchanging nature, their freedom from obstruction toward every being, and their capacity to embrace every being at once — this is named the dwelling-place of beings of great size. "Seventh, it never harbors a dead body. A dead body means the icchantika; one who has violated the four gravest precepts, or the five crimes of immediate retribution; one who has slandered the Vaipulya scriptures; one who calls non-Dharma the Dharma, and the Dharma non-Dharma; one who accepts and keeps the eight kinds of impure object, freely using property belonging to the Buddha or the Saṅgha as he wishes; or one who commits an unlawful act with a monk or a nun — this is named a dead body. This Nirvāṇa Sūtra is free of every one of these, and it is for this very reason that it is named 'never harboring a dead body.' "Eighth, it neither increases nor decreases. Because it is without any boundary at all, without beginning or end, not form, not a produced thing, ever-abiding, neither arising nor ceasing, because every being, without exception, is equal within it, and because the nature of every dharma shares one and the same nature — it is for these very reasons that this is named 'neither increasing nor decreasing.' It is for this very reason that this sūtra, exactly like that great ocean, possesses these eight inconceivable qualities."
The Tuṣita passage extends the previous section's catalogue of bodhisattva paradoxes into its most concrete instance yet: a being who philosophically censures every state of existence as inherently flawed nonetheless takes rebirth in exactly the finest heaven the desire realm offers, and does so without the desire that would ordinarily be required to produce such a birth — the sūtra's own explanation (he can teach and transform beings from any state of existence equally well, so the choice of Tuṣita reflects no craving at all) resolves the paradox the same way Part 31 resolved the bodhisattva's voluntary hell-rebirth: an outcome ordinarily produced by karma is instead produced by vow, leaving the karmic mechanism itself untouched.
The point-by-point correspondence between the ocean's eight wonders and the sūtra's own eight — gradual deepening mapped onto the graduated precepts and fruits, the unreachable bottom mapped onto the Buddha's own paradoxical non-action (neither arising, ceasing, eating, nor teaching, and yet somehow "teaching" this very sūtra), one uniform taste mapped onto every being's shared buddha-nature, the tide's fixed limit mapped onto monastic discipline that will not be transgressed even at the cost of life, the ocean's treasures mapped onto the sūtra's own inventory of practices, its great inhabitants mapped onto buddhas and bodhisattvas, its rejection of corpses mapped onto its own exclusion of the icchantika and precept-breaker, and its constancy under every river's inflow mapped onto the sūtra's own permanence — is this collection's most extended single instance of the "pervasive simile" method Part 29 catalogued among its eight kinds of simile, mapping an entire natural phenomenon onto an entire text feature by feature rather than illustrating one point at a time. The second wonder's own aside — that the sūtra teaches self and no-self, permanence and impermanence, emptiness and non-emptiness, by turns, "and yet no single, fixed formulation of buddha-nature is ever given as final" — is this fascicle's own explicit acknowledgment of the very method the whole chapter has practiced since Part 27's fourteen-fold catechism: depth, here, is defined precisely as resistance to any single settled formula.
Why Not Born by Transformation?
師子吼言:「世尊!若言如來不生不滅名為深者,一切眾生有四種生:卵生、胎生、濕生、化生,是四種生,人中具有。如施婆羅比丘、優婆施婆羅比丘、彌迦羅長者母、尼拘陀長者母、半闍羅長者母,各五百子同於卵生,當知人中則有卵生。濕生者如佛所說,我於往昔作菩薩時,作頂生王及手生王;如今所說,菴羅樹女、迦不多樹女,當知人中則有濕生。劫初之時,一切眾生皆悉化生。如來世尊得八自在,何因緣故不化生耶?」佛言:「善男子!一切眾生四生所生,得聖法已,不得如本卵生、濕生。善男子!劫初眾生皆悉化生,當爾之時佛不出世。善男子!若有眾生遇病苦時,須醫須藥。劫初之時,眾生化生,雖有煩惱,其病未發,是故如來不出其世。劫初眾生身心非器,是故如來不出其世。善男子!如來世尊所有事業勝諸眾生,所謂種姓、眷屬、父母。以殊勝故,凡所說法人皆信受,是故如來不受化生。善男子!一切眾生父作子業,子作父業。如來世尊若受化身則無父母,若無父母,云何能令一切眾生作諸善業?是故如來不受化身。善男子!佛正法中有二種護:一者內,二者外。內護者所謂戒禁,外護者族親眷屬。若佛如來受化身者,則無外護,是故如來不受化身。善男子!有人恃姓而生憍慢,如來為欲破如是慢故,生在貴姓,不受化身。善男子!如來世尊有真父母,父名淨飯,母名摩耶,而諸眾生猶言是幻,云何當受化生之身?若受化身,云何得有碎身舍利?如來為益眾生福德故,碎其身而令供養,是故如來不受化身。一切諸佛悉無化生,云何獨令我受化身?」
Lion's Roar said: "World-Honored One, if it is said that the Tathāgata's own being neither born nor ceasing is what makes this teaching 'deep' — every being has four kinds of birth: egg-birth, womb-birth, moisture-birth, and transformation-birth, and all four kinds of birth are found among human beings. As with the monk Śvetaka, the monk Upaśvetaka, the mother of the elder Mṛgāra, the mother of the elder Nyagrodha, and the mother of the elder Pañcaśāla, each of whom bore five hundred children by egg-birth — one should therefore know that egg-birth, too, is found among human beings. Moisture-birth is exemplified, as the Buddha himself has taught, by my own past life as a bodhisattva, when I became King Mūrdhaja and King Hastigarbha; and, as is now taught, by the amra-tree woman and the kapittha-tree woman — one should therefore know that moisture-birth, too, is found among human beings. At the very beginning of the kalpa, every being, without exception, was born by transformation. The Tathāgata, the World-Honored One, having attained the eight kinds of mastery — for what cause and condition did he not choose transformation-birth for himself?" The Buddha said: "Good son, every being, born through any of these four kinds of birth, once he has attained the noble Dharma, no longer reverts to egg-birth or moisture-birth as he was born before. Good son, at the very beginning of the kalpa, every being was born by transformation, and, at exactly that time, no buddha had yet appeared in the world. Good son, it is like a being who, encountering the suffering of illness, requires a physician and medicine — at the very beginning of the kalpa, beings, born by transformation, though they possessed affliction, had not yet had their own illness manifest, and it is for this very reason that the Tathāgata did not appear in the world at that time. At the very beginning of the kalpa, beings' own bodies and minds were not yet fit vessels for the Dharma, and it is for this very reason, too, that the Tathāgata did not appear in the world then. Good son, the Tathāgata, the World-Honored One, possesses affairs and undertakings that surpass every other being — namely, his own lineage, his own retinue, and his own parents. Because these are so excellent, whatever Dharma he teaches, every person believes and accepts it — it is for this very reason that the Tathāgata does not take on a transformation-body. Good son, every being has a father who performs the deeds of a father, and a son who performs the deeds of a son. Should the Tathāgata, the World-Honored One, take on a transformation-body, he would then have no father or mother at all — and, without a father or mother, how could he possibly cause every being to perform every kind of wholesome deed? It is for this very reason that the Tathāgata does not take on a transformation-body. Good son, within the Buddha's own true Dharma, there are two kinds of protection: internal, and external. Internal protection is the precepts themselves; external protection is one's own clan and kin. Should the Buddha, the Tathāgata, take on a transformation-body, he would then have no external protection at all — it is for this very reason that the Tathāgata does not take on a transformation-body. Good son, there are people who, relying upon their own lineage, give rise to arrogance — and the Tathāgata, wishing to destroy arrogance of exactly this kind, is born instead into a noble lineage, rather than taking on a transformation-body. Good son, the Tathāgata, the World-Honored One, has genuine parents — his father named Śuddhodana, and his mother named Māyā — and yet beings still say that this is all mere illusion. How, then, could he possibly take on a transformation-body instead? And, were he to take on a transformation-body, how could there possibly be relics from his own shattered body afterward? It is for the sake of increasing beings' own merit that the Tathāgata allows his own body to be shattered and offered for veneration — it is for this very reason that the Tathāgata does not take on a transformation-body. Every buddha, without exception, is entirely without transformation-birth — how, then, could I alone be made to take on a transformation-body?"
Lion's Roar's question presses a genuine inconsistency: if the Buddha possesses the eight kinds of mastery, transformation-birth (arising instantaneously, without gestation or biological parents) would seem the most fitting form for one already free of every ordinary constraint, and its absence needs explaining rather than assuming. The Buddha's six reasons divide cleanly into two groups: three concern what the audience needs to actually accept the teaching (an unimpeachable lineage and parentage that lends his words automatic credibility, the biological "protection" of real kin the way precepts furnish inward protection, and the deliberate humbling of caste-pride by being born into it rather than appearing above it) and three concern what the physical fact of an ordinary birth and body make possible afterward (real parents who can perform their own parental role reciprocally, a genuine body capable of being cremated and enshrined as relics, and the simple consistency of matching every other buddha's own historical pattern). Read together, the reasons make a case that has run through this collection since Part 27: the Buddha's own extraordinary freedom is not expressed by escaping ordinary categories altogether, but by inhabiting them so completely and so skillfully that even something as constrained as a physical human birth becomes an instrument of teaching rather than a limitation on it.
Lion's Roar's Hymn of Praise
爾時師子吼菩薩合掌長跪,右膝著地,以偈讚佛: 「如來無量功德聚, 我今不能廣宣說, 今為眾生演一分, 唯願哀愍聽我說。 眾生無明闇中行, 具受無邊百種苦, 世尊能令遠離之, 是故世稱為大悲。 眾生往返生死繩, 放逸迷荒無安樂, 如來能施眾安樂, 是故永斷生死繩。 佛能施眾安樂故, 自於己樂不貪樂, 為諸眾生修苦行, 是故世間興供養。 見他受苦身戰動, 處在地獄不覺痛, 為諸眾生受大苦, 是故無勝無有量。 如來為眾修苦行, 成就具足滿六度, 心處邪風不傾動, 是故能勝世大士。 眾生常欲得安樂, 而不知修安樂因, 如來能教令修習, 猶如慈父愛一子。 佛見眾生煩惱患, 心苦如母念病子, 常思離病諸方便, 是故此身繫屬他。 一切眾生行諸苦, 其心顛倒以為樂, 如來演說真苦樂, 是故稱號為大悲。 世間皆處無明[聲-耳+卵], 無有智嘴能破之, 如來智嘴能啄壞, 是故名為最大子。 不為三世所攝持, 無有名字及假號, 覺知涅槃甚深義, 是故稱佛為大覺。 有河洄澓沒眾生, 無明所盲不知出, 如來自渡能渡彼, 是故稱佛大船師。 能知一切諸因果, 亦復通達盡滅道, 常施眾生病苦藥, 是故世稱大醫王。 外道邪見說苦行, 因是能得無上樂, 如來演說真樂行, 能令眾生受快樂。 如來世尊破邪道, 開示眾生正真路, 行是道者得安樂, 是故稱佛為導師。 非自非他之所作, 亦非共作無因作, 如來所說苦受事, 勝於一切諸外道。 成就具足戒定慧, 亦以此法教眾生, 以法施時無妬悋, 是故稱佛無緣悲。 無所造作無因緣, 獲得無因無果報, 是故一切諸智者, 稱說如來不求報。 常共世間放逸行, 而身不為放逸污, 是故名為不思議, 世間八法不能污。 如來世尊無怨親, 是故其心常平等, 我師子吼讚大悲, 能吼無量師子吼。」
At that time, Lion's Roar Bodhisattva, joining his palms, kneeling upon both knees, his right knee touching the ground, praised the Buddha in this very verse: "The Tathāgata's own merit gathers beyond all measure, I am unable now to proclaim it at any length; yet, for the sake of beings, I shall speak of one small part — I beg only that you, in your own pity, hear what I now say. Beings walk within the darkness of their own ignorance, undergoing every one of a hundred kinds of boundless suffering; the World-Honored One is able to cause them to depart far from it, and it is for this very reason that the world calls him greatly compassionate. Beings turn endlessly upon the rope of birth-and-death, heedless and lost, without any peace or happiness at all; the Tathāgata is able to bestow peace and happiness upon every being, and it is for this very reason that he forever severs the rope of birth-and-death. Because the Buddha is able to bestow peace and happiness upon every being, he himself craves no happiness at all for his own sake; but cultivates austerity for the sake of every being instead, and it is for this very reason that the world rises up to make him offerings. Seeing another undergo suffering, his own body trembles, yet, dwelling within hell itself, he feels no pain at all; for the sake of every being, he undergoes this very great suffering, and it is for this very reason that he is unsurpassed, beyond all measure. The Tathāgata, for the sake of every being, cultivates austerity, accomplishing and fully completing the six perfections entire; his mind, amid the wind of every wrong view, remains unshaken, and it is for this very reason that he surpasses every great being in the world. Beings forever wish to attain peace and happiness, and yet do not know how to cultivate its own true cause; the Tathāgata is able to teach them, causing them to cultivate it, exactly as a loving father cherishes his own only child. The Buddha sees every being's own affliction and suffering, his own heart pained, exactly as a mother thinks of her sick child; forever reflecting on every skillful means to free them from illness, and it is for this very reason that this very body remains bound in service to others. Every being performs every kind of suffering action, their own mind inverted, mistaking it for happiness; the Tathāgata proclaims the true suffering and the true happiness, and it is for this very reason that he is named greatly compassionate. The whole world dwells within the shell of its own ignorance, and has no wise beak at all able to break it open; the Tathāgata's own wise beak is able to peck it apart, and it is for this very reason that he is named the very greatest of offspring. He is held by none of the three times at all, and has no fixed name or borrowed designation; he has awakened to and known nirvāṇa's own profound meaning, and it is for this very reason that the Buddha is called the great awakened one. There is a river whose eddies submerge every being, blinded by ignorance, unable to know how to escape it; the Tathāgata, having crossed it himself, is able to bring others across it too, and it is for this very reason that the Buddha is called the great ship's captain. He is able to know every cause and every fruit entirely, and is, further, fully versed in cessation and in the path; forever bestowing medicine upon every being's own sickness and suffering, and it is for this very reason that the world calls him the great king of physicians. The non-Buddhist teachers, holding wrong views, teach austerity, believing that, through it, one is able to attain the unsurpassed bliss; the Tathāgata proclaims the true conduct that truly leads to bliss, able to cause every being to receive genuine happiness. The Tathāgata, the World-Honored One, destroys every wrong path, revealing to every being the true and genuine road; one who travels this very road attains peace and happiness, and it is for this very reason that the Buddha is called the guide. Not made by oneself, nor made by another, nor made by both together, nor arising without any cause at all; the very account of suffering that the Tathāgata teaches surpasses that of every non-Buddhist teacher there is. He has accomplished and fully completed precept, concentration, and wisdom, and, through this very Dharma, teaches every being as well; and, at the very moment he gives this Dharma, harbors no envy or stinginess at all, and it is for this very reason that the Buddha is called compassion without any condition. He performs no action at all, and depends on no cause at all, attaining neither cause nor fruit of any kind; and it is for this very reason that every wise person declares that the Tathāgata seeks no reward at all. Forever dwelling together with a heedless world, and yet his own body is never stained by heedlessness at all; it is for this very reason that he is named inconceivable, untouched by any of the eight worldly winds at all. The Tathāgata, the World-Honored One, holds neither friend nor foe, and it is for this very reason that his own mind remains forever equal; I, Lion's Roar, praise this very great compassion, able to roar this immeasurable lion's roar."
Lion's Roar's closing hymn functions as a summary in verse of nearly every argument this six-fascicle chapter has made in prose, now compressed into a sequence of epithets each justified by a single line of reasoning: "great compassion" earned by delivering beings from ignorance, "the guide" earned by revealing the true road, "the great ship's captain" earned by having crossed the river himself before bringing others across, "the great king of physicians" earned by knowing cause and cessation together. The mother-and-sick-child and father-and-only-child similes recall the "single-child stage" identification of buddha-nature from earlier in this very fascicle, now given emotional rather than doctrinal expression — and the image of hell endured without any felt pain restates, in verse, the same freely-chosen-not-karmically-earned suffering Part 31 and this fascicle's own bodhisattva catalogue established in prose.
The verse's own philosophical center sits in its account of the Buddha's teaching on suffering as "not made by oneself, nor by another, nor by both, nor without any cause at all" — a fourfold rejection of every possible account of causation a rival philosophy might offer, closing the same causation debate this fascicle opened with the magnet argument, and doing so in the same register Nāgārjuna's own tetralemma would later make famous. The hymn's final image — a mind that holds neither friend nor foe, remaining forever equal — returns to the very quality this collection has tracked since the sūtra's opening fascicles as the clearest outward sign of what "seeing buddha-nature" actually looks like in practice, closing the entire Lion's Roar chapter on the same note it opened with in Part 27: a roar is only truly a lion's roar once uttered before an audience capable of recognizing it, and Lion's Roar's own hymn is offered as exactly that recognition, given back to the one who first taught him to give it.
Part 32 Complete
This closes Part 32 (fascicle 32 of 40) and, with it, the entire six-fascicle 師子吼菩薩品第十一, begun in Part 27 with Lion's Roar's opening question about why he alone, among the assembly, could be said to give a genuine lion's roar. Across these six fascicles, buddha-nature has been identified in turn with ultimate emptiness, the middle way, the twelve links of dependent origination, the Śūraṅgama samādhi, and the middle path between every extreme — tested against a poor man's hidden treasure, a milk-curd debate spanning an entire fascicle, an eightfold catalogue of scriptural simile, Cunda's own hardest challenge that karma might never permit awakening, and, in this final fascicle, seven kinds of people crossing the river of birth and death, a magnet that never actually pulls iron of its own accord, and six blind men each grasping only a part of an elephant they could never fully describe. The chapter closes on the same insistence that opened it: buddha-nature is real, universal, and certain to be seen — and yet cultivation remains entirely necessary, since nothing about universal possession was ever a claim that the path could be skipped. Part 33 opens 迦葉菩薩品第十二, the next of the sūtra's extended dialogues, in which the bodhisattva Kāśyapa takes up the questioning that Lion's Roar now leaves behind.
Continue to Part 33 →