Part 38 of 40 · Fascicle 38 · 迦葉菩薩品第十二之六 · 大般涅槃經 T0374 (Northern Edition)

Everything Is Pure, Holy Conduct

Kāśyapa's opening question closes the loop on six fascicles of increasingly technical inquiry: what, in the end, is pure, holy conduct? The Buddha's answer — "every dharma is" — triggers a magnificent catalogue of similes for the sūtra itself, before narrowing to a precise, working answer: the thirty-seven factors of the path, known nine distinct ways at once. From there the fascicle turns to the ten perceptions that actually lead to nirvāṇa, observed with the same exhaustive, step-by-step method used throughout this whole chapter — and closes with Kāśyapa's own hymn of praise, the first extended verse offering from any bodhisattva in the entire twelfth chapter, marking the end of six fascicles of questioning.

Translator: Ru-Yi Meditation Center Status: Part 38 of 40 Source: Taishō T0374, 大般涅槃經 (tr. Dharmakṣema, 421 CE) Reading notes after Huiyuan's 大般涅槃經義記 (T1764)

What Is Pure, Holy Conduct? Everything.

Chinese Source

◎迦葉菩薩白佛言:「世尊!云何名為清淨梵行?」 佛言:「善男子!一切法是。」 迦葉菩薩言:「世尊!一切法者,義不決定。何以故?如來或說是善不善、或時說為四念處觀、或說是十二入、或說是善知識、或說是十二因緣、或說是眾生、或說是正見邪見、或說十二部經、或說即是二諦,如來今乃說,一切法為淨梵行,悉是何等一切法耶?」 佛言:「善哉,善哉!善男子!如是微妙大涅槃經,乃是一切善法寶藏。譬如大海是眾寶藏,是涅槃經亦復如是,即是一切字義祕藏。善男子!如須彌山眾藥根本,是經亦爾,即是菩薩戒之根本。善男子!譬如虛空是一切物之所住處,是經亦爾,即是一切善法住處。善男子!譬如猛風無能繫縛一切菩薩行,是經者亦復如是,不為一切煩惱惡法之所繫縛。善男子!譬如金剛無能壞者,是經亦爾,雖有外道惡邪之人,不能破壞。善男子!如恒河沙無能數者,如是經義亦復如是,無能數者。善男子!是經典者為諸菩薩而作法幢,如帝釋幢。善男子!是經即是趣涅槃城之商主也,如大導師引諸商人趣向大海。善男子!是經能為諸菩薩等作法光明,如世日月能破諸闇。善男子!是經能為病苦眾生作大良藥,如香山中微妙藥王能治眾病。善男子!是經能為一闡提杖,猶如羸人因之得起。善男子!是經能為一切惡人而作橋梁,猶如世橋能渡一切。善男子!是經能為行二十五有者,遇煩惱熱,而作陰涼,如世間蓋,遮覆暑熱。善男子!是經即是大無畏王,能壞一切煩惱惡魔,如師子王降伏眾獸。善男子!是經即是大神呪師,能壞一切煩惱惡鬼,如世呪師能去魍魎。善男子!是經即是無上霜雹,能壞一切生死果報,如世雹雨壞諸果實。善男子!是經能為壞戒目者作大良藥,猶如世間安闍那藥善療眼痛。善男子!是經能住一切善法,如世間地能住眾物。善男子!是經即是毀戒眾生之明鏡也,如世明鏡見諸色像。善男子!是經能為無慚愧者而作衣服,如世衣裳障蔽形體。善男子!是經能為貧善法者作大財寶,如功德天利益貧者。善男子!是經能為渴法眾生作甘露漿,如八味水充足渴者。善男子!是經能為煩惱之人而作法床,如世之人遇安隱床。善男子!是經能為初地菩薩至十住菩薩,而作瓔珞、香花塗香、末香燒香,清淨種性具足之乘,過於一切六波羅蜜受妙樂處,如忉利天波利質多羅樹。 「善男子!是經即是剛利智斧能伐一切煩惱大樹、即是利刀能割習氣、即是勇健能摧魔怨、即是智火焚煩惱薪、即因緣藏出辟支佛、即是聞藏生聲聞人、即是一切諸天之眼、即是一切人之正道、即是一切畜生依處、即是餓鬼解脫之處、即是地獄無上之尊、即是一切十方眾生無上之器、即是十方過去未來現在諸佛之父母也。善男子!是故此經攝一切法。如我先說,此經雖攝一切諸法,我說梵行即是三十七助道法。善男子!若離如是三十七品,終不能得聲聞正果乃至阿耨多羅三藐三菩提果,不見佛性及佛性果,以是因緣梵行即是三十七品。何以故?三十七品性非顛倒,能壞顛倒;性非惡見,能壞惡見;性非怖畏,能壞怖畏;性是淨行,能令眾生畢竟造作清淨梵行。」

Ru-Yi Translation

Bodhisattva Kāśyapa said to the Buddha: "World-Honored One, what is meant by pure, holy conduct?" The Buddha said: "Good son, every dharma is." Bodhisattva Kāśyapa said: "World-Honored One, 'every dharma' is not a fixed meaning. Why is this? The Tathāgata, at times, teaches it as wholesome and unwholesome; at times teaches it as the contemplation of the four foundations of mindfulness; at times teaches it as the twelve sense-bases; at times teaches it as a good spiritual friend; at times teaches it as the twelve links; at times teaches it as beings themselves; at times teaches it as right view and wrong view; at times teaches it as the twelve divisions of the scriptures; and at times teaches it as the two truths — the Tathāgata now says that every dharma is pure, holy conduct, but which 'every dharma,' exactly, is meant?" The Buddha said: "Excellent, excellent, good son! This subtle and wondrous great nirvāṇa sūtra is itself the very treasury of every wholesome dharma. Exactly as the great ocean is a treasury of every jewel, this nirvāṇa sūtra is exactly the same, the very secret treasury of every letter and every meaning. Good son, exactly as Mount Sumeru is the very root of every medicinal herb, this sūtra is exactly the same, the very root of the bodhisattva precepts. Good son, exactly as space is the very dwelling-place of every existent thing, this sūtra is exactly the same, the very dwelling-place of every wholesome dharma. Good son, exactly as a fierce wind cannot be bound by anything at all, this sūtra is exactly the same, never bound by any afflicted, evil dharma. Good son, exactly as vajra cannot be destroyed by anything, this sūtra is exactly the same — though non-Buddhist and evil people exist, they can never destroy it. Good son, exactly as the sands of the Ganges cannot be counted, this sūtra's own meaning is exactly the same, impossible to fully count. Good son, this scripture serves every bodhisattva as a banner of the Dharma, exactly like Śakra's own banner. Good son, this sūtra is the very caravan-leader guiding beings toward the city of nirvāṇa, exactly like a great guide leading merchants toward the great ocean. Good son, this sūtra is able to serve as the very light of the Dharma for every bodhisattva, exactly as the sun and moon of the world dispel every darkness. Good son, this sūtra is able to serve as a great medicine for beings afflicted by sickness and suffering, exactly as the wondrous medicine king in the fragrant mountains cures every illness. Good son, this sūtra is able to serve as a staff for the icchantika, exactly as a frail person is able to rise again by leaning upon one. Good son, this sūtra is able to serve as a bridge for every evil person, exactly as a bridge in the world allows everyone to cross. Good son, this sūtra is able to serve as cool shade for those traveling through the twenty-five states of existence who encounter affliction's own heat, exactly as a canopy in the world shields against the summer's heat. Good son, this sūtra is itself the great, fearless king, able to destroy every afflicted, evil demon, exactly as the lion king subdues every beast. Good son, this sūtra is itself the great master of spells, able to destroy every afflicted, evil spirit, exactly as a spell-master in the world is able to drive away every goblin. Good son, this sūtra is itself the supreme frost and hail, able to destroy every fruit of birth and death's own retribution, exactly as hail in the world destroys every crop. Good son, this sūtra is able to serve as a great medicine for those whose precept-eye has been damaged, exactly as the world's own añjana ointment skillfully cures a diseased eye. Good son, this sūtra is able to sustain every wholesome dharma, exactly as the earth of the world sustains every existent thing. Good son, this sūtra is itself a bright mirror for beings who have broken the precepts, exactly as a bright mirror in the world reveals every form and image. Good son, this sūtra is able to serve as clothing for those without any sense of shame, exactly as clothing in the world shields the body from view. Good son, this sūtra is able to serve as great wealth for those impoverished in wholesome dharmas, exactly as the goddess of merit benefits the poor. Good son, this sūtra is able to serve as a stream of ambrosia for beings thirsting for the Dharma, exactly as water of the eight qualities satisfies the thirsty. Good son, this sūtra is able to serve as a bed of the Dharma for those afflicted, exactly as a person in the world finds peace upon a comfortable bed. Good son, this sūtra is able to serve, for bodhisattvas from the first ground up through the tenth abiding, as a necklace, as fragrant flowers and perfumed unguent, as powdered and burning incense, as the complete vehicle of the pure lineage, surpassing every place of subtle pleasure found even in the six perfections, exactly like the Trāyastriṃśa heaven's own pārijāta tree. "Good son, this sūtra is itself the sharp, keen axe of wisdom able to fell the great tree of every affliction; is itself the sharp knife able to cut away habitual tendencies; is itself the bold courage able to crush every demon and enemy; is itself the fire of wisdom that burns affliction's own kindling; is itself the storehouse of causes and conditions from which the pratyekabuddha emerges; is itself the storehouse of hearing from which the śrāvaka is born; is itself the very eye of every god; is itself the true path of every person; is itself the very refuge of every animal; is itself the very place of liberation for every hungry ghost; is itself the supreme lord of hell itself; is itself the supreme vessel for every being of the ten directions; and is itself the very father and mother of every buddha of the ten directions, past, present, and future. Good son, it is for this reason that this sūtra encompasses every dharma. As I have previously said, though this sūtra encompasses every dharma, I teach that pure, holy conduct is itself the thirty-seven factors that assist the path. Good son, apart from these thirty-seven factors, one can never attain the true fruit of the śrāvaka, nor, all the way through, the fruit of supreme, perfect awakening, nor behold buddha-nature or its fruit — and it is on account of exactly this that pure, holy conduct is itself these thirty-seven factors. Why is this? Because the nature of these thirty-seven factors is itself free of inversion, and is able to destroy inversion; is itself free of evil view, and is able to destroy evil view; is itself free of fear, and is able to destroy fear; and, its very nature being pure conduct, is able to cause beings, in the end, to bring about pure, holy conduct."

Reading note — after Huiyuan

Huiyuan counts forty-two separate phrases of praise in this catalogue before the sūtra narrows to its working definition (T1764, lines 22798–22804), and reads the entire structure as a two-step answer: first, an expansive, almost overwhelming demonstration that this sūtra genuinely does encompass every dharma — treasury, root, dwelling-place, weapon, medicine, mirror, food, clothing, wealth, bed, ornament, axe, knife, storehouse, eye, refuge, father and mother — and only then, having established the breadth of the claim beyond doubt, a deliberate narrowing to the single, practical answer a practitioner can actually act on: the thirty-seven factors of the path. The catalogue's own function is rhetorical rather than merely decorative — it forecloses the objection that naming "the thirty-seven factors" as pure conduct somehow diminishes or contradicts the earlier, sweeping claim that "every dharma" is pure conduct, since the thirty-seven factors are shown to already contain, in compressed form, everything the forty-two similes separately praised.

Why the Contaminated Path Can Never Be Called Pure Conduct

Chinese Source

迦葉菩薩白佛言:「世尊!有漏之法,亦復能作無漏法因,如來何故不說有漏為淨梵行?」 「善男子!一切有漏即是顛倒,是故有漏不得名為清淨梵行。」 迦葉菩薩白佛言:「世尊!世第一法,為是有漏、是無漏耶?」 佛言:「善男子!是有漏也。」 「世尊!雖是有漏,性非顛倒,何故不名清淨梵行?」 「善男子!世第一法,無漏因故似於無漏,向無漏故不名顛倒。善男子!清淨梵行發心相續乃至畢竟,世第一法唯是一念,是故不得名淨梵行。」 迦葉菩薩白佛言:「世尊!眾生五識亦是有漏,非是顛倒,復非一念,何故不名清淨梵行?」 「善男子!眾生五識雖非一念,然是有漏,復是顛倒,增諸漏故,名為有漏。體非真實,著想故倒。云何名為體非真實,著想故倒?非男女中生男女想,乃至舍宅車乘瓶衣亦復如是,是名顛倒。善男子!三十七品性無顛倒,是故得名清淨梵行。善男子!若有菩薩於三十七品,知根、知因、知攝、知增、知主、知導、知勝、知實、知畢竟者,如是菩薩則得名為清淨梵行。」◎

Ru-Yi Translation

Bodhisattva Kāśyapa said to the Buddha: "World-Honored One, a defiled dharma, too, is able to serve as the cause of an undefiled dharma — why, then, does the Tathāgata not teach that the defiled path is itself pure, holy conduct?" "Good son, every defiled dharma is itself inversion — and it is for this reason that the defiled can never be called pure, holy conduct." Bodhisattva Kāśyapa said to the Buddha: "World-Honored One, is the supreme worldly dharma itself defiled, or is it undefiled?" The Buddha said: "Good son, it is defiled." "World-Honored One, though it is defiled, its own nature is free of inversion — why, then, is it not called pure, holy conduct?" "Good son, the supreme worldly dharma, being the very cause of the undefiled, resembles the undefiled, and, tending toward the undefiled, is not called inversion. Good son, pure, holy conduct extends continuously from the very arising of the mind all the way to its final completion, while the supreme worldly dharma lasts but a single moment of thought — and it is for this reason that it cannot be called pure, holy conduct." Bodhisattva Kāśyapa said to the Buddha: "World-Honored One, beings' own five sense-consciousnesses are likewise defiled, yet are free of inversion, and are, further, not confined to a single moment — why, then, are they not called pure, holy conduct?" "Good son, beings' own five sense-consciousnesses, though not confined to a single moment, are nonetheless defiled, and are, further, inverted — increasing every defilement, they are called defiled. Their own essence lacking reality, and clinging to a false perception, they are called inverted. What is meant by their essence lacking reality, and clinging to a false perception producing inversion? Giving rise to the perception of male and female where there is, in truth, no male or female at all, and, all the way through, giving rise to the perception of dwelling, vehicle, vessel, and clothing in exactly the same way — this is called inversion. Good son, the very nature of the thirty-seven factors is free of inversion, and it is for this reason that they alone are properly called pure, holy conduct. Good son, should any bodhisattva, with regard to these thirty-seven factors, know the root, know the cause, know the inclusion, know the increase, know the lord, know the guide, know the supreme, know the real, and know the ultimate, a bodhisattva of exactly this kind is then called one who possesses pure, holy conduct."

Reading note — after Huiyuan

Huiyuan tracks this as four successive rounds of Kāśyapa narrowing the same objection — a defiled dharma can serve as an undefiled dharma's cause, so why exclude it from "pure conduct"? — against four increasingly specific candidates (T1764, lines 22806–22819): defiled dharmas generally (excluded because inversion is definitional to the defiled), the supreme worldly dharma specifically (excluded not for inversion, which it lacks, but for lasting only a single moment of thought, whereas pure conduct names a sustained continuity from first arising to final completion), and the five sense-consciousnesses (excluded because, though not confined to a single moment, they still qualify as inverted in a narrower, technical sense — clinging to a superimposed perception, such as "male" or "female," laid over what is, in reality, simply the aggregates). Huiyuan flags a genuine cross-reference puzzle here worth preserving: strictly speaking, "perception" (想) and "consciousness" (識) are distinct mental categories in the Abhidharma systems this sūtra draws on, so calling the five sense-consciousnesses themselves "inverted through clinging to perception" blends two technically separate categories — a blending Huiyuan attributes to this sūtra following the *Abhidharma-mahāvibhāṣā*'s looser usage rather than the stricter *Abhidharmakośa* distinction, since in ordinary experience perception and its associated sense-consciousness always arise together as inseparable companions.

Nine Ways of Knowing the Thirty-Seven Factors

Chinese Source

◎迦葉菩薩白佛言:「世尊!云何名為知根乃至知畢竟耶?」 佛言:「善男子!善哉,善哉。菩薩發問為於二事:一者為自知故、二者為他知故。汝今已知,但為無量眾生未解,啟請是事,是故我今重讚歎汝。善哉,善哉!善男子!三十七品,根本是欲,因名明觸,攝取名受,增名善思,主名為念,導名為定,勝名智慧,實名解脫,畢竟名為大般涅槃。善男子!善欲即是初發道心,乃至阿耨多羅三藐三菩提之根本也,是故我說欲為根本。善男子!如世間說,一切苦惱,愛為根本;一切疹病,宿食為本;一切斷事,鬪諍為本。一切惡事,虛妄為本。」 迦葉菩薩白佛言:「世尊!如來先於此經中說,一切善法不放逸為本,今乃說欲,是義云何?」 佛言:「善男子!若言生因,善欲是也;若言了因,不放逸是。如世間說,一切果者子為其因。或復有說,子為生因,地為了因,是義亦爾。」 迦葉菩薩言:「世尊!如來先於餘經中說,三十七品佛是根本,是義云何?」 「善男子!如來先說,眾生初知三十七品,佛是根本。若自證得,欲為根本。」 「世尊!云何明觸,名之為因?」 「善男子!如來或時說明為慧、或說為信。善男子!信因緣故,親近善友,是名為觸。親近因緣,得聞正法,是名為觸。因聞正法,身口意淨,是名為觸。因三業淨,獲得正命,是名為觸。因正命故,得淨根戒;因淨根戒,樂寂靜處;因樂寂靜,能善思惟;因善思惟,得如法住;因如法住,得三十七品,能壞無量諸惡煩惱,是名為觸。善男子!受名攝取,眾生受時能作善惡,是故名受為攝取也。善男子!受因緣故生諸煩惱,三十七品能破壞之,是故以受為攝取也。因善思惟能破煩惱,是故名增。何以故?勤修習故。得如是等三十七品,若觀能破諸惡煩惱,要賴專念,是故以念為主。如世間中一切四兵隨主將意,三十七品亦復如是,皆隨念主。善男子!既入定已,三十七品能善分別一切法相,是故以定為導。是三十七品分別法相,智為最勝,是故以慧為勝。如是智慧知煩惱已,智慧力故,煩惱消滅,如世間中四兵壞怨,或一、或二勇健者能。三十七品亦復如是,智慧力故能壞煩惱,是故以慧為勝。善男子!雖因修習三十七品,獲得四禪神通安樂,亦不名實。若壞煩惱證解脫時,乃名為實。是三十七品發心修道,雖得世樂及出世樂、四沙門果及以解脫,亦不得名為畢竟也。若能斷除三十七品所行之事,是名涅槃,是故我說畢竟者即大涅槃。」

Ru-Yi Translation

Bodhisattva Kāśyapa said to the Buddha: "World-Honored One, what is meant by knowing the root, all the way through to knowing the ultimate?" The Buddha said: "Good son, excellent, excellent! A bodhisattva raises a question for the sake of two things: knowing it for himself, and having others come to know it. You yourself already know this, and yet, for the sake of countless beings who do not yet understand, you raise this very request — and it is for this reason that I now praise you once again. Excellent, excellent! Good son, of these thirty-seven factors, the root is desire; the cause is called the contact of wisdom; the inclusion is called feeling; the increase is called wholesome reflection; the lord is called mindfulness; the guide is called concentration; the supreme is called wisdom; the real is called liberation; and the ultimate is called the great nirvāṇa. Good son, wholesome desire is itself the very root, from the first arising of the mind bent on the path, all the way through to supreme, perfect awakening — and it is for this reason that I teach desire as the root. Good son, exactly as it is said in the world that craving is the root of every suffering and affliction, that old, undigested food is the root of every illness, that quarreling is the root of every ended relationship, and that falsehood is the root of every evil deed." Bodhisattva Kāśyapa said to the Buddha: "World-Honored One, the Tathāgata has previously taught, in this very sūtra, that heedfulness is the root of every wholesome dharma — how, then, can it now be taught that desire is the root instead?" The Buddha said: "Good son, spoken of as a generative cause, wholesome desire is indeed the root; spoken of as a revealing cause, heedfulness is the root. Exactly as it is said in the world that, of every fruit, the seed is its cause — yet one might equally say that the seed is the generative cause, while the earth is the revealing cause — the meaning here is exactly the same." Bodhisattva Kāśyapa said: "World-Honored One, the Tathāgata has previously taught, in other sūtras, that the Buddha himself is the root of the thirty-seven factors — what is the meaning of this?" "Good son, the Tathāgata previously taught that, for a being first coming to know the thirty-seven factors, the Buddha is their root; but, once one has personally realized them for oneself, desire is the root." "World-Honored One, in what sense is the contact of wisdom called the cause?" "Good son, the Tathāgata, at times, speaks of wisdom as 'wisdom' itself, and, at other times, speaks of it as 'faith.' Good son, through the cause and condition of faith, one draws close to a good spiritual friend — this is called contact. Through the cause and condition of drawing close to such a friend, one comes to hear the true Dharma — this is called contact. Through hearing the true Dharma, body, speech, and mind become pure — this is called contact. Through the purity of these three karmas, one attains right livelihood — this is called contact. Through right livelihood, one attains pure conduct at the very root of the faculties; through this pure conduct, one delights in a still and quiet place; through delighting in stillness, one is able to reflect wisely; through wise reflection, one attains abiding in accordance with the Dharma; and through abiding in accordance with the Dharma, one attains the thirty-seven factors, able to destroy countless evil afflictions — this, too, is called contact. Good son, inclusion means to gather in — beings, at the moment of feeling, are able to perform either wholesome or unwholesome deeds, and it is for this reason that feeling is called the inclusion. Good son, on account of feeling as cause and condition, every affliction arises, yet the thirty-seven factors are able to destroy it — and it is for this reason, too, that feeling is called the inclusion. Through wise reflection, affliction is destroyed, and it is for this reason that it is called the increase. Why is this? Because it comes through diligent cultivation. Having attained these very thirty-seven factors, contemplating them so as to destroy every evil affliction requires single-minded mindfulness above all — and it is for this reason that mindfulness is called the lord. Exactly as, in the world, all four divisions of an army follow their commanding general's own intent, the thirty-seven factors are exactly the same, all following mindfulness as their own lord. Good son, having already entered concentration, the thirty-seven factors are thereby able to skillfully distinguish every mark of every dharma — and it is for this reason that concentration is called the guide. Among the thirty-seven factors' own distinguishing of every mark of dharma, wisdom is supreme above all — and it is for this reason that wisdom is called the supreme. Wisdom of this kind, having known affliction, through its very power, causes affliction to be dissolved and extinguished — exactly as, in the world, when four divisions of an army defeat an enemy, it may be one or two valiant warriors alone who actually accomplish it. The thirty-seven factors are exactly the same: through the power of wisdom, affliction is destroyed, and it is for this reason that wisdom is called the supreme. Good son, though one may, through cultivating the thirty-seven factors, attain the four dhyānas, supernormal powers, and ease, this, too, is not yet called the real — only when affliction is destroyed and liberation is realized is it called the real. These thirty-seven factors, from the very arising of the mind bent on cultivating the path, though one may attain worldly pleasure and the pleasure that transcends the world, the four fruits of the śramaṇa, and liberation itself, this, too, cannot yet be called the ultimate. Only when one is able to sever entirely the very activity the thirty-seven factors themselves perform is this called nirvāṇa — and it is for this reason that I say the ultimate is simply the great nirvāṇa itself."

Chinese Source

「復次善男子!善愛念心,即是欲也。因善愛念,親近善友,故名為觸,是名為因。因近善友,故名為受,是名攝取。因近善友能善思惟,故名為增。因是四法能生長道,所謂欲、念、定、智,是即名為主導勝也。因是三法,得二解脫,除斷愛故,心得解脫,斷無明故,慧得解脫,是名為實。如是八法,畢竟得果,名為涅槃,故名畢竟。 「復次善男子,欲者即是發心出家,觸者即是白四羯磨,是名為因。攝者即是受二種戒:一者波羅提木叉戒、二者淨根戒,是名為受,是名攝取。增者即是修習四禪。主者即是須陀洹果、斯陀含果。導者即是阿那含果。勝者即是阿羅漢果。實者即是辟支佛果。畢竟者即是阿耨多羅三藐三菩提果。◎ 「◎復次善男子!欲名為識,觸名六入,攝名為受,增名無明,主名名色,導名為愛,勝名為取,實名為有,畢竟者名生老病死。」 迦葉菩薩言:「世尊!根本、因、增,如是三法云何有異?」 「善男子!所言根者即是初發,因者即是相似不斷,增者即是滅相似已能生相似。復次善男子!根即是作、因即是果、增即可用。善男子!未來之世雖有果報,以未受故,名之為因。及其受時,是名為增。復次善男子!根即是求、得即是因、用即是增。善男子!是經中根即是見道、因即修道、增者即是無學道也。復次善男子!根即正因,因即方便因,從是二因,獲得果報,名為增長。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"Further, good son, a mind of wholesome love and affection is itself this very desire. Through this wholesome love and affection, one draws close to a good spiritual friend — this is called contact, and this is called the cause. Through drawing close to a good spiritual friend, one attains feeling — this is called the inclusion. Through drawing close to a good spiritual friend, one is able to reflect wisely — this is called the increase. Through these very four dharmas, the path is thereby able to grow and increase — namely desire, mindfulness, concentration, and wisdom — and these are precisely what are called the lord, the guide, and the supreme. Through these three dharmas, two kinds of liberation are attained: through severing craving, the mind attains liberation; through severing ignorance, wisdom attains liberation — this is called the real. These eight dharmas, ultimately attaining their fruit, are called nirvāṇa, and this is called the ultimate. "Further, good son, desire is simply the arising of the mind that goes forth from home; contact is simply the formal act of ordination performed through the four proclamations — this is called the cause. Inclusion is simply the receiving of the two kinds of precept: the prātimokṣa precepts, and the pure precepts of the faculties — this is called feeling, and this is called the inclusion. Increase is simply the cultivation of the four dhyānas. The lord is simply the fruit of stream-entry and the fruit of once-returning. The guide is simply the fruit of non-returning. The supreme is simply the fruit of arhatship. The real is simply the fruit of pratyekabuddhahood. The ultimate is simply the fruit of supreme, perfect awakening. "Further, good son, desire is named consciousness; contact is named the six sense-bases; inclusion is named feeling; increase is named ignorance; the lord is named name-and-form; the guide is named craving; the supreme is named grasping; the real is named becoming; and the ultimate is named birth, old age, sickness, and death." Bodhisattva Kāśyapa said: "World-Honored One, these three dharmas — the root, the cause, and the increase — how, exactly, do they differ from one another?" "Good son, what is called the root is simply the very first arising; what is called the cause is a continuous similarity, unbroken; and what is called the increase is the ceasing of this similarity, and its capacity to give rise, in turn, to a further similarity. Further, good son, the root is simply the deed itself; the cause is simply the fruit; and the increase is simply what can be put to use. Good son, though a fruit exists in the future, since it has not yet been received, it is called the cause; and, at the very moment it is received, it is called the increase. Further, good son, the root is simply the seeking; the attainment is simply the cause; and the use is simply the increase. Good son, in this very sūtra, the root is simply the path of seeing; the cause is simply the path of cultivation; and the increase is simply the path beyond training. Further, good son, the root is simply the correct cause; the cause is simply the cause of skillful means; and, from these two causes together, the fruit is obtained, and this is called increase."

Reading note — after Huiyuan

Huiyuan's technical identification is precise and worth preserving: eight of the nine terms in this taxonomy map directly onto eight of the ten universal mental factors recognized across the Abhidharma systems (desire, contact, feeling, volition, mindfulness, concentration, wisdom, and liberation), with only perception and recollection excluded — perception because its role lies mainly in the distant approach to the path rather than the path itself, recollection because it contributes no great independent function of its own (T1764, lines 22826–22836). The ninth term, "the ultimate," stands apart as the fruit these eight factors-as-causes together produce, rather than a ninth factor alongside them. Huiyuan reads the three parallel restatements that follow — desire-through-ultimate mapped onto going-forth-through-supreme-awakening, and then onto the twelve links themselves, from consciousness through birth-old-age-death — not as three competing systems but as the identical ninefold structure viewed through three different lenses: the general cause-and-effect vocabulary of ordinary mental factors, the concrete monastic path from ordination to buddhahood, and the twelve links of dependent origination, each equally valid because each names the same underlying progression from a first stirring to its ultimate, exhaustive fruit. The closing distinction between root, cause, and increase — first arising, continuous similarity, and the productive transformation of that similarity into something new — gives the entire ninefold schema its own internal logic: not nine static labels, but nine stages of a single process caught at nine different moments of its own unfolding.

How Nirvāṇa Is Attained: The Ten Perceptions

Chinese Source

迦葉菩薩言:「世尊!如佛所說,畢竟者即是涅槃,如是涅槃云何可得?」 「善男子!若菩薩摩訶薩、比丘、比丘尼、優婆塞、優婆夷能修十想,當知是人能得涅槃。云何為十?一者無常想、二者苦想、三者無我想、四者厭離食想、五者一切世間不可樂想、六者死想、七者多過罪想、八者離想、九者滅想、十者無愛想。善男子!菩薩摩訶薩、比丘、比丘尼、優婆塞、優婆夷,修習如是十種想者,是人畢竟定得涅槃,不隨他心,自能分別善、不善等,是名真實稱比丘義,乃至得稱優婆夷義。」 迦葉菩薩言:「世尊!云何名為菩薩乃至優婆夷等修無常想?」 「善男子!菩薩二種:一初發心、二已行道。無常想者,亦復二種:一麁、二細。初心菩薩觀無常想時,作是思惟:『世間之物凡有二種:一內、二外。如是內物,無常變異,我見生時、小時、大時、壯時、老時、死時,是諸時節各各不同,是故當知內物無常。』復作是念:『我見眾生,或有肥鮮,具足色力,去來進止自在無礙。或見病苦,色力毀悴,顏貌羸損,不得自在。或見財富,庫藏盈溢。或見貧窮,觸事尠乏。或見成就無量功德。或見具足無量惡法。是故定知內法無常。復觀外法,子時、芽時、莖時、葉時、花時、果時,如是諸時各各不同,如是外法或有具足、或不具足,是故當知,一切外物定是無常。』既觀見法是無常已,復觀聞法。我聞諸天具足成就極妙快樂、神通自在,亦有五相,是故當知即是無常。復聞劫初有諸眾生,各各具足上妙功德,身光自照不假日月,無常力故光滅德損。復聞昔有轉輪聖王統四天下,成就七寶,得大自在,而不能壞無常之相。復觀大地,往昔之時,安處布置無量眾生,間無空處,如車輪許,具足生長一切妙藥,藂林、樹木、果實滋茂,眾生薄福,令此大地無復勢力,所生之物遂成虛耗。是故當知,內外之法一切無常,是則名為麁無常也。」

Ru-Yi Translation

Bodhisattva Kāśyapa said: "World-Honored One, as the Buddha has taught, the ultimate is itself nirvāṇa — how, then, is this very nirvāṇa actually attained?" "Good son, should a bodhisattva mahāsattva, a monk, a nun, a layman, or a laywoman be able to cultivate ten perceptions, one should know that this person is thereby able to attain nirvāṇa. What are these ten? First, the perception of impermanence; second, the perception of suffering; third, the perception of no-self; fourth, the perception of weariness toward food; fifth, the perception that no place in the world is worth delighting in; sixth, the perception of death; seventh, the perception of one's many past faults; eighth, the perception of departure; ninth, the perception of cessation; and tenth, the perception free of craving. Good son, a bodhisattva mahāsattva, a monk, a nun, a layman, or a laywoman who cultivates these very ten perceptions is a person certain, in the end, to attain nirvāṇa, following no one else's mind, but able, of himself, to distinguish wholesome from unwholesome — and this is what is truly and properly meant by the very term 'monk,' and, all the way through, by the term 'laywoman' as well." Bodhisattva Kāśyapa said: "World-Honored One, what is meant by a bodhisattva, and, all the way through, a laywoman, cultivating the perception of impermanence?" "Good son, a bodhisattva is of two kinds: one who has just given rise to the mind of awakening, and one who has already practiced the path for some time. The perception of impermanence, likewise, is of two kinds: coarse, and subtle. A beginning bodhisattva, contemplating the perception of impermanence, reflects in this way: 'Every thing in the world is, in all, of two kinds: internal, and external. This internal thing is impermanent, subject to change — I see it at the time of birth, at the time of childhood, at the time of youth, at the time of maturity, at the time of old age, and at the time of death, and these various times each differ from one another; therefore one should know that internal things are impermanent.' He reflects, further: 'I see beings, some of them plump and radiant, complete in beauty and strength, moving and resting freely, without any obstruction at all; and I see others afflicted with sickness, their beauty and strength wasted away, their countenance ravaged and diminished, no longer free at all. I see some possessed of wealth, their storehouses overflowing; and I see others impoverished, lacking in everything they touch. I see some who have accomplished countless merits; and I see others who possess countless evil dharmas in full. Therefore I know with certainty that internal dharmas are impermanent.' He further contemplates external dharmas: the time of the seed, the time of the sprout, the time of the stem, the time of the leaf, the time of the flower, and the time of the fruit — these various times, too, each differ from one another, and external dharmas of this kind are, at times, complete, and, at other times, incomplete; therefore one should know that every external thing is, without exception, impermanent. Having contemplated what is directly seen as impermanent, he further contemplates what is only heard of. I have heard that the gods, complete in the most exquisite pleasure and mastery of supernormal power, still experience the five signs of decline — and therefore one should know that they, too, are impermanent. I have further heard that, at the very start of this eon, there were beings each complete with the most excellent qualities, their own bodies shining with light requiring no sun or moon at all — yet, through the very power of impermanence, this light was extinguished and these qualities diminished. I have further heard that there once existed a wheel-turning sage-king who ruled over all four continents, possessing the seven treasures and attaining the greatest mastery — and yet he, too, was unable to escape the mark of impermanence. I further contemplate the great earth, which, in ages past, provided a settled dwelling for countless beings, with no empty space at all, as densely as the spokes of a wheel, giving rise to and nurturing every wondrous medicinal herb, its thickets, forests, and trees flourishing with abundant fruit — yet, beings' own merit having grown thin, this great earth has lost its former power, and everything it now produces has become meager and depleted. Therefore one should know that every internal and external dharma, without exception, is impermanent — and this is what is called coarse impermanence."

Chinese Source

「既觀麁已,次觀細者。云何名細?菩薩摩訶薩觀於一切內外之物乃至微塵,在未來時已是無常。何以故?具足成就破壞相故。若未來色非無常者,不得言色有十時差別。云何十時?一者膜時、二者泡時、三者疱時、四者肉團時、五者肢時、六者嬰孩時、七者童子時、八者少年時、九者盛壯時、十者衰老時。菩薩觀膜若非無常,不應至泡乃至盛壯,非無常者終不至老。若是諸時,非念念滅,終不漸長,應當一時成長具足;無是事故,是故當知,定有念念微細無常。復見有人,諸根具足,顏色暐曄,後見枯悴。復作是念,是人定有念念無常。復觀四大及四威儀。復觀內外,各二苦因,飢渴寒熱。復觀是四,若無念念微細無常,亦不得說如是四苦。若有菩薩能作是念,是名菩薩觀細無常。如內外色心法亦爾。何以故?行六處故。行六處時,或生喜心、或生瞋心、或生愛心、或生念心,展轉異生不得一種,是故當知,一切色法及非色法悉是無常。善男子!菩薩若能於一念中,見一切法生滅無常,是名菩薩具無常想。善男子!智者修習無常想已,遠離常慢、常倒、想倒。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"Having contemplated the coarse, he next contemplates the subtle. What is meant by the subtle? The bodhisattva mahāsattva contemplates that every internal and external thing, all the way down to the finest particle of dust, is already impermanent even in the future, not yet arisen. Why is this? Because it is already, in full, endowed with the very mark of eventual disintegration. Were future form not impermanent, one could not speak of form as passing through ten distinct stages. What are these ten stages? First, the membrane stage; second, the bubble stage; third, the blister stage; fourth, the flesh-mass stage; fifth, the limb stage; sixth, the infant stage; seventh, the child stage; eighth, the youth stage; ninth, the prime-of-life stage; and tenth, the aged and declining stage. Should the bodhisattva contemplate that the membrane stage were not impermanent, it ought never to proceed to the bubble stage, and, all the way through, to the prime of life — for what is not impermanent never reaches old age at all. And should these various stages not be perishing moment by moment, they could never gradually grow at all, but ought instead to reach their full growth all at once — yet, since this plainly does not happen, one should know with certainty that there is indeed a subtle impermanence occurring moment by moment. He further observes a person complete in every faculty, radiant in countenance, later seen withered and wasted — and reflects, further, that this person, too, must possess this very moment-by-moment impermanence. He further contemplates the four great elements and the four postures of the body. He further contemplates that, both internally and externally, there are two causes of suffering each: hunger and thirst internally, cold and heat externally. He further contemplates that, were there no subtle, moment-by-moment impermanence, one could not even speak of these four kinds of suffering at all. Should a bodhisattva be able to reflect in this way, this is called the bodhisattva's contemplation of subtle impermanence. Exactly the same holds true for internal and external form and mental dharmas alike. Why is this? Because of activity across the six sense-fields. At the moment of this very activity across the six sense-fields, one gives rise, at times, to joy, at times, to anger, at times, to craving, and, at times, to a further thought, each one arising differently in succession, never remaining a single, fixed thing — and therefore one should know that every material dharma and every non-material dharma, without exception, is impermanent. Good son, should a bodhisattva be able, within a single moment of thought, to see every dharma's own arising and ceasing as impermanent, this is called the bodhisattva fully possessing the perception of impermanence. Good son, the wise, having cultivated the perception of impermanence, thereby depart from the arrogance of permanence, the inversion of permanence, and the inversion of perception."

Reading note — after Huiyuan

Huiyuan organizes the coarse-impermanence contemplation into a careful progression from what is directly witnessed to what is only known by report: first internal change across a single lifetime (birth through death), then external change in the natural world (seed through fruit), then what is seen but not personally lived through (the varying fortunes of other beings), and finally what is never seen at all but only heard of — the gods' own decline, the first beings of this eon losing their self-luminous bodies, a wheel-turning king's power ultimately failing, and the earth's own fertility diminishing through the general decline of merit (T1764, lines 22897–22916). Each register extends the contemplation's reach further from direct experience, so that impermanence is established not merely as a personal observation but as a truth holding at every possible scale, witnessed or not. The subtle-impermanence argument then makes a stronger, more technical claim: the ten-stage sequence of bodily development (from a mere membrane through infancy to old age) could only unfold gradually, stage by stage, if something were already perishing and renewing at every single moment beneath the surface of that visible sequence — otherwise, lacking any moment-by-moment mechanism for change, the whole developmental sequence would have to appear complete all at once, which plainly does not happen. This is the same argument used, from a different angle, against the milk-curd debate's own naive theories of causation in earlier fascicles: visible, gradual sequences of change are themselves the proof of an invisible, momentary process underlying them, not evidence against it.

Suffering and No-Self

Chinese Source

「次修苦想。何因緣故有如是苦?深知是苦因於無常,因無常故,受生老病死,生老病死因緣故,名為無常,無常因緣故,受內外苦,飢渴、寒熱、鞭打、罵辱,如是等苦,皆因無常。復次智者深觀此身,即無常器,是器即苦,以器苦故,所受盛法亦復是苦。善男子!智者復觀,生即是苦,滅即是苦,苦生滅故,即是無常,非我、我所。 「修無我想。智者復觀苦即無常,無常即苦,若苦無常,智者云何說言有我?苦非是我,無常亦爾。如是五陰亦苦、無常,眾生云何說言有我?復次觀一切法有異和合,不從一和合生一切法,亦非一法是一切和合果,一切和合皆無自性,亦無一性,亦無異性,亦無物性亦無自在,諸法若有如是等相,智者云何說言有我?復作是念,一切法中無有一法能為作者,若使一法不能作者,眾法和合亦不能作。一切諸法,性終不能獨生獨滅,和合故滅,和合故生。是法生已,眾生倒想,言是和合。從和合生,眾生想倒無有真實,云何而有真實我耶?是故智者觀於無我。又復諦觀何因緣故眾生說我?是我若有,應一應多。我若一者,云何而有剎利、婆羅門、毘舍、首陀、人、天、地獄、餓鬼、畜生、大小、老壯?是故知我非是一也。我若多者,云何說言,眾生我者是一、是遍、無有邊際?若一、若多,二俱無我。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"Next, one cultivates the perception of suffering. For what cause and condition does suffering of this kind exist? One knows deeply that this suffering has impermanence as its own cause: because of impermanence, one receives birth, old age, sickness, and death; and, on account of the very cause and condition of birth, old age, sickness, and death, this is called impermanence. On account of this very impermanence, one receives every internal and external suffering — hunger and thirst, cold and heat, beating and flogging, curses and insults — sufferings of exactly this kind all arise from impermanence. Further, the wise contemplate deeply that this very body is itself a vessel of impermanence, and this vessel is itself suffering; and, because the vessel itself is suffering, whatever it receives and contains is likewise suffering. Good son, the wise, further, contemplate that arising is itself suffering, and ceasing is itself suffering — and, because suffering itself arises and ceases, it is itself impermanent, neither self nor anything belonging to a self. "One cultivates the perception of no-self. The wise, further, contemplate that suffering is itself impermanence, and impermanence is itself suffering — and, if it is suffering and impermanence, how could the wise possibly say that a self exists? Suffering is not the self, and impermanence is exactly the same. The five aggregates, being likewise suffering and impermanent, how could beings possibly say that a self exists? Further, one contemplates that every dharma is a distinct combination of factors, that no single combination gives rise to every dharma, and that no single dharma is the fruit of every combination; that every combination is, in itself, without any fixed nature at all — neither a single nature, nor a distinct nature, nor a material nature, nor a nature of mastery — and, dharmas possessing marks of exactly this kind, how could the wise possibly say that a self exists? One reflects, further, that, among every dharma, not a single one is able to act as an independent agent — and, if not even a single dharma is able to act as an agent, then a mere combination of many such dharmas, too, is unable to act as an agent. Every dharma, by its very nature, is never able to arise or cease independently of itself; it is only through combination that it ceases, and only through combination that it arises. Once such a dharma has arisen, beings, through their own inverted perception, call it a 'combination' — yet, arising from mere combination, beings' own perception of it is itself inverted, possessing no reality at all; how, then, could there possibly be any real, substantial self there at all? It is for this reason that the wise contemplate no-self. One further examines closely: for what cause and condition do beings speak of a self at all? Were this self to truly exist, it ought to be either single or manifold. Were the self single, how could there then be kṣatriyas, brahmins, vaiśyas, and śūdras, humans and gods, hell-beings, hungry ghosts, and animals, the great and the small, the old and the youthful? Therefore one knows that the self is not single. And were the self manifold, how, then, could it be said that beings' own self is one, all-pervading, and without any boundary at all? Whether single or manifold, in either case, there is no self."

Reading note — after Huiyuan

Huiyuan reads the no-self argument here as running through five distinct approaches in sequence rather than repeating a single point: suffering and impermanence are shown to exclude a self directly (since neither can coherently be identified with anything permanent enough to count as a "self"); every dharma's own status as a mere combination, lacking any fixed nature of its own, excludes a self residing anywhere within that combination; the fact that no single dharma, nor any mere aggregate of dharmas, is capable of independent agency excludes a self acting as their controller; the fact that all arising and ceasing already happens through combination alone, with no further agent needed to explain it, excludes positing a self as an unnecessary addition; and finally the direct dilemma — a self would have to be either exactly one, shared identically by every being, or else many, one per being — closes off both remaining possibilities, since a single universal self cannot explain the plain differences between beings, while a plural self cannot be called truly "one, all-pervading, without boundary" the way self-theories typically require. This fivefold structure mirrors the twenty-nine severed-wholesome-roots arguments from Part 35 in form — a battery of independent proofs converging on one conclusion — but reversed in direction, building a positive case for no-self rather than a case for nihilism, showing that the same rigorous, multi-angled argumentative method serves opposite ends depending on what it is actually establishing.

Weariness of Food, and the World Not Worth Delighting In

Chinese Source

「智者如是觀無我已,次復觀於厭離食想。作是念言,若一切法無常、苦、空、無我,云何為食,起身、口、意三種惡業?若有眾生為貪食故,起身、口、意三種惡業,所得財物眾皆共之,後受苦果無共分者。善男子!智者復觀,一切眾生為飲食故,身心受苦。若從眾苦而得食者,我當云何於是食中而生貪著?是故於食不生貪心。復次智者當觀,因於飲食身得增長,我今出家,受戒修道,為欲捨身;今貪此食,云何當得捨此身耶?如是觀已,雖復受食,猶如曠野食其子肉,其心厭惡,都不甘樂。深觀揣食有如是過,次觀觸食,如被剝牛,為無量虫之所唼食。次觀思食,如大火聚。識食猶如三百鑽矛。善男子!智者如是觀四食已,於食終不生貪樂想。若猶生貪,當觀不淨。何以故?為離食愛故。於一切食,善能分別不淨之想,隨諸不淨令與相似。如是觀已,若得好食及以惡食,受時猶如塗癰瘡藥,終不生於貪愛之心。善男子!智者若能如是觀者,是名成就厭離食想。」 迦葉菩薩言:「世尊!智者觀食作不淨想,為是實觀?虛解觀耶?若是實觀,所觀之食實非不淨。若是虛解,是法云何名為善想?」 佛言:「善男子!如是想者,亦是實觀,亦是虛解。能壞貪食故名為實,非虫見虫故名虛解。善男子!一切有漏皆名為虛,亦能得實。善男子!若有比丘發心乞食,預作是念:『我當乞食,願得好者莫得麁惡,願必多得莫令尠少,亦願速得莫令遲晚。』如是比丘不名於食得厭離想,所修善法日夜衰耗,不善之法漸當增長。善男子!若有比丘欲乞食時,先當願言:『令諸乞者悉得飽滿,其施食者得無量福,我若得食為療毒身,修習善法利益施主。』作是願時,所修善法日夜增長,不善之法漸當消滅。善男子!若有比丘能如是修,當知是人不空食於國中信施。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"The wise, having contemplated no-self in this way, next contemplate weariness toward food. They reflect: if every dharma is impermanent, suffering, empty, and without self, why, then, does food give rise to three kinds of evil karma in body, speech, and mind? Should any being, out of craving for food, give rise to these three kinds of evil karma in body, speech, and mind, whatever wealth is thereby obtained is shared among many, yet, when the suffering fruit of it comes due, no one shares it with him at all. Good son, the wise, further, contemplate that every being, for the sake of food and drink, suffers in body and mind. Should food be obtained only through such manifold suffering, how could I possibly give rise to craving and attachment toward this very food? It is for this reason that no craving mind arises toward food at all. Further, the wise ought to contemplate that, through food and drink, the body itself grows and increases — yet I have now left the household life, received the precepts, and cultivated the path, precisely in order to relinquish this very body; if I now crave this food, how, then, could I ever come to relinquish this body at all? Having contemplated in this way, though one still receives food, it is exactly like eating one's own child's flesh in a desolate wilderness — the mind finds it repugnant, taking no pleasure in it whatsoever. Having deeply contemplated the fault of edible food in this way, one next contemplates the food of contact, exactly like a skinned cow devoured by countless insects. One next contemplates the food of intention, exactly like a great mass of fire. And the food of consciousness is exactly like being pierced by three hundred spears. Good son, the wise, having contemplated these four kinds of food in this way, never again give rise to craving or delight toward food at all. Should craving still arise, one ought to contemplate impurity. Why is this? For the sake of departing from craving for food. With regard to every kind of food, one skillfully distinguishes the perception of impurity, matching it to whatever is truly impure in each case. Having contemplated in this way, whether one receives good food or poor food, one receives it exactly as one would apply medicine to a festering wound, never giving rise to a craving, attached mind at all. Good son, should the wise be able to contemplate in this way, this is called accomplishing the perception of weariness toward food." Bodhisattva Kāśyapa said: "World-Honored One, when the wise contemplate food and form the perception of impurity, is this a true contemplation, or a false understanding? If it is a true contemplation, then the food actually contemplated is, in reality, not impure at all. And if it is a false understanding, how, then, can a dharma of this kind be called a wholesome perception?" The Buddha said: "Good son, a perception of this kind is both a true contemplation and a false understanding at once. Because it is able to destroy craving for food, it is called true; because it perceives an insect where there is, in truth, no insect at all, it is called a false understanding. Good son, every defiled dharma is, in this sense, called false, and yet is also able to attain something true. Good son, should a monk, setting out with the intention to beg for food, reflect beforehand: 'May I obtain good food, and not coarse or poor food; may I certainly obtain much, and not too little; and may I obtain it quickly, and not too late' — a monk of this kind is not said to have attained weariness toward food, and the wholesome dharmas he cultivates diminish day and night, while unwholesome dharmas gradually increase. Good son, should a monk, wishing to beg for food, first make this vow: 'May every one who begs attain full satisfaction; may the one who offers this food attain boundless merit; and, should I myself obtain food, may it serve only to treat this poisonous body of mine, so that I may cultivate wholesome dharmas for my benefactor's own benefit' — making a vow of this kind, the wholesome dharmas he cultivates increase day and night, while unwholesome dharmas gradually diminish. Good son, should a monk be able to cultivate in this way, one should know that this person does not consume the faithful offerings of the land in vain."

Chinese Source

「善男子!智者具足如是四想,能修世間不可樂想,作是念言:『一切世間無處不有生老病死,而我此身無處不生。若世間中無有一處當得離於生老病死,我當云何樂於世間?一切世間無有進得而不退失,是故世間定是無常,若是無常,云何智人而樂於世?一一眾生,周遍經歷一切世間,具受苦樂,雖復得受梵天之身乃至非想非非想天,命終還墮三惡道中。雖為四王乃至他化自在天身,命終生於畜生道中、或為師子、虎豹豺狼、象馬牛驢。次觀轉輪聖王之身,統四天下,豪貴自在,福盡貧困,衣食不供。』智者深觀如是事已,生於世間不可樂想。智者復觀世間有法,所謂舍宅、衣服飲食、臥具醫藥、香花瓔珞,種種伎樂、財物寶貨,如是等事皆為離苦;而是等物體即是苦,云何以苦欲離於苦?善男子!智者如是觀已,於世間物,不生愛樂而作樂想。善男子!譬如有人身嬰重病,雖有種種音樂倡伎、香花瓔珞,終不於中生貪愛樂。智者觀已亦復如是。善男子!智者深觀一切世間,非歸依處、非解脫處、非寂靜處、非可愛處、非彼岸處、非是常樂我淨之法,若我貪樂如是世間,我當云何得離是法?如人不樂處闇,而求光明,還復歸闇,闇即世間,明即出世。若我樂世,增長黑闇,遠離光明,闇即無明,光即智明,是智明因即是世間不可樂想。一切貪結雖是繫縛,然我今者貪於智明,不貪世間。智者深觀如是法已,具足世間不可樂想。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"Good son, the wise, fully possessing these four perceptions above, are thereby able to cultivate the perception that no place in the world is worth delighting in. They reflect: 'Every place in the world has birth, old age, sickness, and death — there is nowhere at all that this very body of mine is not born. If there is no single place in the world where one could truly escape birth, old age, sickness, and death, how, then, could I possibly delight in the world at all? Everything in the world that advances and is attained eventually declines and is lost, and it is for this reason that the world is certainly impermanent — and, being impermanent, how could the wise possibly delight in it? Every single being, passing through the entire world in turn, fully experiences both suffering and pleasure — though one may attain the body of a Brahmā god, or even the heaven of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, at the end of that life, one falls back into the three evil destinies. And though one may attain the body of one of the four heavenly kings, or even the heaven of mastery over others' creations, at the end of that life, one is born into the animal realm — as a lion, a tiger, a leopard, a jackal, an elephant, a horse, an ox, or a donkey.' He next contemplates the body of a wheel-turning sage-king, ruling over all four continents, noble and possessed of every mastery — yet, his merit exhausted, falling into poverty, lacking even clothing and food. The wise, having deeply contemplated matters of exactly this kind, give rise to the perception that no place in the world is worth delighting in. The wise, further, contemplate that whatever dharmas exist in the world — dwellings, clothing, food and drink, bedding, medicine, fragrant flowers and necklaces, every kind of music and entertainment, wealth and treasure — all such things exist for the sake of departing from suffering; yet these very things are, in their own essence, themselves simply suffering — how, then, could one possibly use suffering itself to depart from suffering? Good son, the wise, having contemplated in this way, no longer give rise to craving or delight toward worldly things, seeing through the mere appearance of pleasure they present. Good son, it is exactly like a person afflicted with a grave illness — though surrounded by every kind of music, entertainment, fragrant flowers, and necklaces, he never gives rise to craving or delight in any of it. The wise, having contemplated in this way, are exactly the same. Good son, the wise contemplate deeply that the entire world is no place of refuge, no place of liberation, no place of stillness, no place worthy of love, no far shore at all, and possesses none of the dharmas of permanence, bliss, self, and purity — and, were I to crave and delight in a world of this kind, how, then, could I ever come to depart from it? It is exactly like a person who, taking no pleasure in dwelling in darkness, seeks the light, yet returns once more to darkness — darkness being the world itself, and light being what transcends it. Should I delight in the world, I thereby increase this very darkness and depart further from the light — darkness being simply ignorance, and light being simply the brightness of wisdom; and it is this very cause, the brightness of wisdom, that constitutes the perception that no place in the world is worth delighting in. Every bond of craving, though it is indeed a form of bondage, I now crave only the brightness of wisdom, and crave the world not at all. The wise, having deeply contemplated dharmas of exactly this kind, fully possess the perception that no place in the world is worth delighting in."

Reading note — after Huiyuan

Huiyuan reads the four-food analysis (edible food, contact, intention, and consciousness — the standard fourfold classification of what sustains a being) as escalating deliberately from the most familiar to the most abstract, so that revulsion cultivated toward ordinary eating carries over to the subtler forms of "feeding" a mind performs at every moment through sense-contact, volitional intention, and the mere continuity of consciousness itself — each illustrated by an image more visceral than the last, from eating one's own child's flesh to being pierced by three hundred spears. Kāśyapa's sharp question — is the impurity-perception a true observation or a deliberate fiction? — receives an answer Huiyuan treats as a genuine methodological principle rather than a dodge: the perception is factually false (there is no literal insect in the rice), yet functionally true (it actually accomplishes the destruction of craving it sets out to accomplish), and a defiled, provisional device of this kind earning the name "true" solely through its real effect is the same logic underlying the sūtra's own skillful-means teachings throughout — a device need not correspond to a literal fact to be a genuinely wholesome and effective one. The two contrasting almsround vows (self-interested versus dedicated to the giver's own benefit) make the identical point in the register of intention rather than perception: the same external act, begging for food, either erodes or builds wholesome qualities entirely depending on the state of mind behind it — a small, concrete instance of the "mind, speech, and intent must agree" principle from Part 36 applied to the humblest daily activity a monastic performs.

The Perception of Death, and the Ten Perceptions Complete

Chinese Source

「善男子!有智之人已修世間不可樂想,次修死想觀。是壽命常為無量怨讎所遶,念念損減,無有增長。猶山瀑水不得停住、亦如朝露勢不久停、如囚趣市步步近死、如牽牛羊詣於屠所。」 迦葉菩薩言:「世尊!云何智者觀念念滅?」 「善男子!譬如四人,皆善射術,聚在一處,各射一方,俱作是念:『我等四箭俱發俱墮。』復有一人作是念言:『如是四箭及其未墮,我能一時以手接取。』善男子!如是之人可說疾不?」 迦葉菩薩言:「如是。世尊!」 佛言:「善男子!地行鬼疾復速是人,有飛行鬼復速地行,四天王疾復速飛行,日月神天復速四王,行堅疾天復速日月,眾生壽命復速堅疾。善男子!一息一眴,眾生壽命四百生滅。智者若能觀命如是,是名能觀念念滅也。善男子!智者觀命繫屬死王,我若能離如是死王,則得永斷無常壽命。復次智者觀是壽命,猶如河岸臨峻大樹,亦如有人作大逆罪及其受戮無憐惜者,如師子王大飢困時,亦如毒蛇吸大風時,猶如渴馬護惜水時,如大惡鬼瞋恚發時,眾生死王亦復如是。善男子!智者若能作如是觀,是則名為修習死想。 「善男子!智者復觀,我今出家設得壽命七日七夜,我當於中精勤修道,護持禁戒,說法教化利益眾生,是名智者修於死想。復以七日七夜為多,若得六日、五日、四日、三日、二日、一日、一時、乃至出息、入息之頃,我當於中精勤修道,護持禁戒,說法教化利益眾生,是名智者善修死想。智者具足如上六想,即七想因。何等名七?一者常修想、二者樂修想、三者無瞋想、四者無妬想、五者善願想、六者無慢想、七者三昧自在想。善男子!若有比丘具足七想,是名沙門、名婆羅門、是名寂靜、是名淨潔、是名解脫、是名智者、是名正見、名到彼岸、名大醫王、是大商主、是名善解如來祕密,亦知諸佛七種之語,名正見知,斷七種語中所生疑網。善男子!若人具足如上六想,當知是人能呵三界,遠離三界,滅除三界,於三界中不生愛著,是名智者具足十想。若有比丘具是十想,即得稱可沙門之相。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"Good son, a wise person, having already cultivated the perception that no place in the world is worth delighting in, next cultivates the contemplation of death. This very lifespan is forever surrounded by countless enemies, diminishing moment by moment, never once increasing — exactly like a mountain torrent's own rushing water, which never pauses to remain still; exactly like the morning dew, whose brief moment never lasts long; exactly like a condemned prisoner led to the marketplace, drawing closer to death with every single step; exactly like an ox or a sheep being led toward the slaughterhouse." Bodhisattva Kāśyapa said: "World-Honored One, how, exactly, does the wise person contemplate this moment-by-moment perishing?" "Good son, it is exactly like four people, all skilled archers, gathered together in one place, each shooting an arrow in a different direction, all reflecting together: 'Our four arrows, released together, shall fall together.' There is, further, a certain person who reflects: 'Before these four arrows have even fallen, I am able to catch all of them, at one and the same moment, with my own hand.' Good son, could a person of this kind be called swift?" Bodhisattva Kāśyapa said: "Yes indeed, World-Honored One." The Buddha said: "Good son, an earth-bound spirit is swifter still than this person; a flying spirit is swifter still than the earth-bound spirit; the four heavenly kings are swifter still than the flying spirit; the gods of the sun and moon are swifter still than the four heavenly kings; the gods of unwavering swiftness are swifter still than the gods of the sun and moon; and beings' own lifespan is swifter still than these very gods of unwavering swiftness. Good son, within a single breath, within a single blink of the eye, a being's own lifespan already undergoes four hundred arisings and perishings. Should the wise be able to contemplate the lifespan in this way, this is called being able to contemplate its moment-by-moment perishing. Good son, the wise contemplate that this very lifespan is bound to the lord of death himself — and, should I be able to depart from this very lord of death, I shall thereby forever sever this impermanent lifespan. Further, the wise contemplate this very lifespan as exactly like a great tree leaning precariously over a river's steep bank; or exactly like a person who has committed a grave, treasonous crime and is about to be executed, with no one to show him any mercy at all; exactly like the lion king in the grip of great hunger; exactly like a poisonous serpent drawing in a mighty gust of wind; exactly like a thirsty horse guarding a precious store of water; or exactly like a great and evil spirit whose fury has just erupted — the lord of death that awaits every being is exactly the same. Good son, should the wise be able to contemplate in this way, this is precisely what is called cultivating the perception of death. "Good son, the wise, further, contemplate: even should I, having left the household life, attain no more than seven days and seven nights of life remaining, I shall, within this very span, diligently cultivate the path, uphold the precepts, and teach and transform beings for their own benefit — this is called the wise cultivating the perception of death. And, should even seven days and seven nights be considered too many, then, should I attain only six days, five days, four days, three days, two days, one day, a single hour, or even the mere span of a single outbreath or inbreath, I shall, within this very span, diligently cultivate the path, uphold the precepts, and teach and transform beings for their own benefit — this is called the wise skillfully cultivating the perception of death. The wise, fully possessing these six perceptions above, thereby possess the very cause of seven further perceptions. What are these seven? First, the perception of constant cultivation; second, the perception of joyful cultivation; third, the perception free of anger; fourth, the perception free of envy; fifth, the perception of wholesome vows; sixth, the perception free of pride; and seventh, the perception of mastery in samādhi. Good son, should a monk fully possess these seven perceptions, he is called a śramaṇa, called a brahmin, called still, called pure, called liberated, called wise, called one of right view, called one who has reached the far shore, called the great physician-king, called the great caravan-leader, and called one who skillfully understands the Tathāgata's own secret meaning, who knows, further, the seven kinds of language of every buddha, called one of right view and right knowledge, who severs the net of doubt arising with regard to these seven kinds of language. Good son, should a person fully possess these six perceptions above, one should know that this person is able to reject the three realms, depart far from the three realms, extinguish the three realms entirely, and never give rise to craving or attachment within the three realms — this is called the wise fully possessing the ten perceptions. Should any monk possess these ten perceptions, he thereby attains what may truly be called the mark of a śramaṇa."

Reading note — after Huiyuan

Huiyuan's arithmetic here is worth spelling out, since the text moves quickly between counts: six perceptions have been fully treated by this point (impermanence, suffering, no-self, weariness toward food, the world's own lack of delight, and death), and these six together become the "cause" of seven further perceptions the text lists but does not individually unpack in detail — constant cultivation, joyful cultivation, freedom from anger, freedom from envy, wholesome vows, freedom from pride, and mastery in samādhi (T1764, lines 22970–22975). Huiyuan reads this as a genuine structural claim, not mere praise: cultivating the six base perceptions to completion does not simply add up to seven more virtues sitting alongside them, but actually generates these seven as their natural consequence, the way a cause generates its own proper fruit. The remaining four perceptions in the original list of ten (many past faults, departure, cessation, and freedom from craving) are subsumed within this same structure rather than treated as wholly separate stages — Huiyuan notes the *Daśabhūmika Sūtra*'s own parallel fourfold sequence of weariness, departure, cessation, and dedication as the likely source for this compression, with the sūtra here choosing to develop the first six in exhaustive step-by-step detail while gathering the remaining four into a single, summarizing close. The lord-of-death similes — the tree over the riverbank, the condemned criminal, the ravenous lion, the poisonous serpent, the thirsty horse, the enraged spirit — each capture a different quality of death's own imminence (structural precariousness, moral finality, appetite, force, desperation, and sudden violence) rather than repeating a single image six times, giving the contemplation genuine range rather than mere repetition.

Kāśyapa's Hymn of Praise

Chinese Source

爾時迦葉菩薩,即於佛前以偈讚佛: 「憐愍世間大醫王, 身及智慧俱寂靜, 無我法中有真我, 是故敬禮無上尊。 發心畢竟二不別, 如是二心先心難, 自未得度先度他, 是故我禮初發心。 初發已為人天師, 勝出聲聞及緣覺, 如是發心過三界, 是故得名最無上。 世救要求然後得, 如來無請而為師, 佛隨世間如犢子, 是故得名大悲牛。 如來功德滿十方, 凡下無智不能讚, 我今讚歎慈悲心, 為報身口二種業。 世間常樂自利益, 如來終不為是事, 能斷眾生世果報, 是故我禮自他利。 世間逐親作益厚, 如來利益無怨親, 佛無是相如世人, 是故其心等無二。 世間說異作業異, 如來如說業無差, 凡所修行斷諸行, 是故得名為如來。 先已了知煩惱過, 示現處之為眾生, 久於世間得解脫, 樂處生死慈悲故。 雖現天身及人身, 慈悲隨逐如犢子, 如來即是眾生母, 慈心即是小犢子。 自受眾苦念眾生, 悲念時心不悔沒, 憐愍心盛不覺苦, 故我稽首拔苦者。 如來雖作無量福, 身口意業恒清淨, 常為眾生不為己, 是故我禮清淨業。 如來受苦不覺苦, 見眾受苦如己苦, 雖為眾生處地獄, 不生苦想及悔心。 一切眾生受異苦, 悉是如來一人苦, 覺已其心轉堅固, 故能勤修無上道。 佛具一味大慈心, 悲念眾生如子想, 眾生不知佛能救, 故謗如來及法僧。 世間雖具眾煩惱, 亦有無量諸過惡, 如是眾結及罪過, 佛初發心已能壞。 唯有諸佛能讚佛, 除佛無能讚歎者, 我今唯以一法讚, 所謂慈心遊世間。 如來慈是大法聚, 是慈亦能度眾生, 即是無上真解脫, 解脫即是大涅槃。」◎

Ru-Yi Translation

At that time, Bodhisattva Kāśyapa, in the Buddha's own presence, praised the Buddha with these verses: "Compassionate toward the world, the great physician-king, His body and his wisdom both perfectly still — Within the very dharma of no-self, a true self is found; It is for this that I bow in reverence to the unsurpassed one. Between the mind first arising and the mind at final completion, there is no difference, Yet, of these two minds, it is the first that is the harder; Not yet crossed over himself, he crosses others over first — It is for this that I bow before the mind's very first arising. Once this mind has first arisen, he already becomes the teacher of gods and humans, Surpassing even the śrāvaka and the pratyekabuddha — A mind arisen in this way already transcends the three realms; It is for this that it is called the very most unsurpassed. The saviors of the world require a request before they act, Yet the Tathāgata, unasked, becomes the teacher of all — The Buddha follows the world exactly as a calf follows its mother; It is for this that he is called the great, compassionate ox. The Tathāgata's own merit fills the ten directions, Yet the ignorant and lowly are unable to praise it at all — I now praise only his mind of loving-kindness and compassion, In repayment for his own bodily and verbal deeds. The world forever seeks pleasure for its own benefit alone, Yet the Tathāgata never once acts for this reason — He is able to sever beings' own worldly retribution; It is for this that I bow before one who benefits both self and other. The world follows kinship in granting its generosity, Yet the Tathāgata's own benefit knows neither friend nor foe — The Buddha bears no such distinction, unlike people of the world; It is for this that his mind remains, without exception, undivided. The world speaks one way and acts another, Yet the Tathāgata's actions never differ from his own words — Whatever he cultivates, he thereby severs every conditioned activity; It is for this that he is called the Tathāgata. Having already fully understood affliction's own faults, He manifests himself dwelling among them for beings' own sake — Long ago already liberated from this very world, He delights in dwelling amid birth and death, out of compassion alone. Though he manifests the body of a god, and the body of a human, His compassion follows after beings exactly as a calf follows its mother — The Tathāgata is himself the very mother of all beings; His mind of loving-kindness is himself the small calf. Receiving every suffering upon himself for the sake of remembering beings, At the very moment of this compassionate remembrance, his mind never regrets or falters — So full is his compassion that he does not even notice the suffering; It is for this that I bow my head before the one who draws out suffering. Though the Tathāgata performs boundless merit, His bodily, verbal, and mental karma remain forever pure — Always acting for the sake of beings, never for himself; It is for this that I bow before this very pure karma. The Tathāgata receives suffering yet does not notice it as suffering, Seeing beings' own suffering exactly as though it were his own — Though he dwells in hell itself for beings' own sake, He gives rise to no perception of suffering, nor any thought of regret. Every being's own different suffering Is, in every case, this single Tathāgata's own suffering alone — Realizing this, his mind grows ever more resolute, And so he is able to diligently cultivate the unsurpassed path. The Buddha possesses a single, undivided mind of great loving-kindness, Holding every being in compassionate thought exactly as his own child — Yet beings, not knowing that the Buddha is able to save them, Thereby slander the Tathāgata, and the Dharma, and the saṅgha as well. Though the world is filled with every affliction, And possesses boundless faults and evils besides, Bonds and faults of exactly this kind The Buddha was already able to destroy from the very first arising of his own mind. Only the buddhas themselves are truly able to praise a buddha; Apart from a buddha, no one else can offer this praise in full — I now offer my praise through but a single dharma alone: That of a mind of loving-kindness, wandering freely through the world. The Tathāgata's own loving-kindness is itself the great gathering of every dharma; This very loving-kindness is also able to deliver every being across — It is itself the unsurpassed, true liberation, And this very liberation is itself the great nirvāṇa."

Reading note — after Huiyuan

This hymn is the first extended verse offering from Kāśyapa himself across the entire twelfth chapter, and its placement here, closing six fascicles of relentless technical questioning, gives it the weight of a formal conclusion rather than a mere interlude. The praise moves through a deliberate sequence: first the paradox of true self found within no-self, then the harder-than-completion difficulty of the very first arising of the awakening-mind (a theme reaching back to the sūtra's own teaching that a beginning bodhisattva's resolve, though incomplete, already surpasses śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas in kind), then a series of contrasts between ordinary worldly conduct and the Buddha's own — acting unbidden, benefiting without partiality, matching word to deed exactly — before turning to the central image of the calf and its mother, repeated twice, casting the Buddha's own compassion as instinctive and inseparable rather than a discipline cultivated at a distance from the one who feels it. The verse "every being's own different suffering is, in every case, this single Tathāgata's own suffering alone" is the hymn's own emotional center, and gives concrete, felt form to what Parts 27 through 38 have spent twelve fascicles arguing in technical terms: that buddha-nature, the identity of beings and Buddha, and the reality of a suffering shared rather than merely observed from outside are not separate doctrines but different expressions of a single truth. The chapter closes exactly where its central argument always pointed — loving-kindness itself named as liberation, and liberation named, in turn, as the great nirvāṇa the entire twelfth chapter has been circling from its very first fascicle.

Part 38 Complete — 迦葉菩薩品 Concluded

With Kāśyapa's own hymn of praise, the twelfth chapter, 迦葉菩薩品, comes to its close — six fascicles (Parts 33–38) that opened with Sunakṣatra's fall into hell before the Buddha's own eyes, worked through Kāśyapa's catalogue of twenty apparent contradictions and the Buddha's own point-by-point resolution of each, built the full technical vocabulary of four kinds of answer, seven kinds of language, and buddha-nature traced stage by stage, reapplied the river simile to the sūtra's own reception, and closed with an exhaustive, first-principles map of affliction, karma, and suffering culminating in the ten perceptions that lead to nirvāṇa. This is the second complete six-fascicle chapter of this translation, following 師子吼菩薩品 (Parts 27–32) — and, exactly as that chapter closed with Lion's Roar's own hymn, this one closes with Kāśyapa's, the questioner across six fascicles taking up his own voice in praise rather than inquiry. Part 39 opens 憍陳如品第十三, the thirteenth and final chapter of the sūtra.

Continue to Part 39 →