The Two Practices, and Chen Guan's Postscript
The tenth and final doubt asks the most practical question of all — what does a person actually do? — and answers with a twofold practice: renunciation, a clear-eyed contemplation of the body's own impurity, paired with aspiration toward Amitābha and his land. This page closes the collection with Chen Guan's 1093 postscript, on doubt and faith as the root beneath every other question the treatise has answered.
Doubt 10: What Practice, and What of Married Life?
第十疑
問:「今欲決定求生西方,未知作何行業,以何為種子,得生彼國?又凡夫俗人,皆有妻、子,未知不斷婬欲得生彼否?」
答:「欲決定生西方者,具有二種行,定得生彼:一者、厭離行;二者、欣願行。言厭離行者,凡夫無始已來,為五欲纏縛,輪迴五道,備受眾苦,不起心厭離五欲,未有出期。為此,常觀此身膿、血,屎、尿,一切惡露不淨臭穢。故《涅槃經》云:『如是身城,愚癡羅剎止住其中。誰有智者,當樂此身?』又經云:『此身眾苦所集,一切皆不淨。扼縛癰瘡等,根本無義利。上至諸天身,皆亦如是。』行者若行、若坐、若睡、若覺,常觀此身唯苦無樂,深生厭離。縱使妻房不能頓斷,漸漸生厭,作七種不淨觀:一者、觀此婬欲身,從貪愛煩惱生,即是種子不淨;二者、父母交會之時,赤白和合,即是受生不淨;三者、母胎中在生藏下,居熟藏上,即是住處不淨;四者、在母胎時唯食母血,即是食噉不淨;五者、日、月滿足頭向產門,膿、血俱出臭穢狼藉,即是初生不淨;六者、薄皮覆上,其內膿、血遍一切處,即是舉體不淨;七者、乃至死後膖脹、爛壞,骨、肉縱橫,狐、狼食噉,即是究竟不淨。自身既爾,他身亦然。所愛境界,男、女身等,深生厭離,常觀不淨。若能如此觀身不淨之者,婬欲煩惱漸漸減少。又作十想等觀,廣如經說。
又發願:『願我永離三界雜食,臭穢、膿血不淨,耽荒五欲男、女等身,願得淨土法性生身。』此謂厭離行。
「二、明欣願行者,復有二種:一者、先明求往生之意;二者、觀彼淨土莊嚴等事,欣心願求。明往生意者,所以求生淨土,為欲救拔一切眾生苦故。即自思忖:『我今無力,若在惡世,煩惱境強,自為業縛,淪溺三塗,動經劫數,如此輪轉,無始已來未曾休息,何時能得救苦眾生?為此求生淨土親近諸佛,若證無生忍,方能於惡世中救苦眾生。』故《往生論》云:『言發菩提心者,正是願作佛心;願作佛心者,則是度眾生心;度眾生心者,則是攝眾生,生佛國心。』
「又願生淨土須具二行:一者、必須遠離三種障菩提門法;二者、須得三種順菩提門法。何者為三種障菩提法?一者、依智慧門,不求自樂,遠離我心貪著自身故;二者、依慈悲門,拔一切眾生苦,遠離無安眾生心故;三者、依方便門,當憐愍一切眾生,欲與其樂,遠離恭敬供養自身心故。若能遠三種菩提障,則得三種順菩提法:一者、無染清淨心,不為自身求諸樂故。菩提是無染清淨處,若為自身求樂,即染身心、障菩提門,是故無染清淨心是順菩提門;二者、安清淨心,為拔眾生苦故。菩提心是安隱一切眾生清淨處,若不作心拔一切眾生,令離生死苦,即違菩提門,是故安清淨心是順菩提門;三者樂清淨心,欲令一切眾生得大菩提、涅槃故,菩提、涅槃是畢竟常樂處,若不作心令一切眾生得畢竟常樂,即遮菩提門。此菩提因何而得?要因生淨土常不離佛,得無生忍已,於生死國中救苦眾生,悲、智內融,定而常用,自在無礙,即菩提心,此是願生之意。
「二、明欣心願求者,希心起想緣彌陀佛,若法身、若報身等,金色光明八萬四千相,一一相中八萬四千好,一一好放八萬四千光明,常照法界,攝取念佛眾生。又觀彼淨土七寶莊嚴妙樂等,備如《無量壽經》、《觀經》十六觀等,常行念佛三昧,及施、戒、修等,一切善行悉已迴施一切眾生同生彼國,決定得生,此謂欣願門也。」
淨土十疑論(終)
Doubt 10
Question: "Now I wish to seek, with firm resolve, rebirth in the west — but I do not yet know what practice to undertake, or what should serve as the seed that leads to birth in that land. And ordinary lay people all have wives and children — I do not know whether, without cutting off sexual desire entirely, one can still be born there or not."
Answer: "For one who wishes to seek rebirth in the west with firm resolve, there are two practices in full, by which rebirth there is certain: the first is the practice of renunciation; the second is the practice of aspiration.
"As for the practice of renunciation: sentient beings, since beginningless time, have been bound and entangled by the five desires, turning through the five destinies, undergoing every kind of suffering in full — and if they never give rise to a mind that renounces and turns away from the five desires, there will never come a day of release. For this reason, one should constantly contemplate this body as pus and blood, excrement and urine, every kind of foul discharge, impure and stinking. This is why the Nirvāṇa Sūtra says: 'Such a city of a body — a foolish rākṣasa dwells within it. What wise person could take delight in such a body?' And another sūtra says: 'This body is a gathering-place of every suffering, entirely impure throughout. Fettered and bound, an oozing sore — at its root it holds no benefit or value at all. Up to the very bodies of the heavenly beings, all are exactly the same.' A practitioner, whether walking, sitting, sleeping, or waking, should constantly contemplate this body as nothing but suffering, without any pleasure at all, and give rise to a deep sense of renunciation. Even if one cannot cut off relations with one's spouse all at once, one should gradually cultivate a sense of aversion, through seven contemplations of impurity: first, contemplating that this body of sexual desire arises from the affliction of craving and attachment — this is the impurity of the seed itself; second, that at the moment of the parents' union, red and white fluids combine — this is the impurity of the very taking of life; third, that within the mother's womb one lies below the raw digestive organs and above the ripe ones — this is the impurity of one's dwelling-place; fourth, that while in the womb one feeds on nothing but the mother's blood — this is the impurity of what one eats; fifth, that when the months are full and the head turns toward the birth canal, pus and blood come forth together, foul and disordered — this is the impurity of birth itself; sixth, that a thin layer of skin covers the body, with pus and blood filling every part beneath it — this is the impurity of the whole body; and seventh, that after death the body swells, decays, and rots, bones and flesh scattered apart, devoured by foxes and wolves — this is the impurity of the final end. As one's own body is exactly so, so too is the body of any other. Toward whatever object one loves, whether a man's body or a woman's, one should give rise to deep renunciation, and constantly contemplate its impurity. If one can contemplate the body's impurity in this way, the affliction of sexual desire will gradually lessen. One should also cultivate the ten contemplations and the like, as set out at length in the sūtras.
"One should also make this vow: 'May I forever leave behind the mixed and impure food of the three realms, the foul and impure pus and blood, and the bodies of men and women given over to the indulgence of the five desires — and may I attain, instead, the Dharma-nature body born in the pure land.' This is what is meant by the practice of renunciation.
"Second, as for the practice of aspiration: this too has two aspects. The first sets out the meaning of seeking rebirth itself; the second contemplates the adornments and the like of that pure land, with a mind of joyful aspiration and longing. As for the meaning of seeking rebirth: the reason one seeks rebirth in the pure land is precisely in order to save and rescue all sentient beings from suffering. One should reflect: 'I have, at present, no power of my own. Were I to remain in this evil world, the power of affliction is strong, and I would be bound of myself by karma, sinking into the three evil destinies, passing through kalpa after kalpa in this way — turning on and on, since beginningless time, without ever once coming to rest. When, then, could I ever manage to save suffering beings? It is for this reason that I seek rebirth in the pure land, to draw near to the buddhas there — and only once I have realized the acceptance of non-arising will I truly be able to save suffering beings amid an evil world.' This is why the Rebirth Treatise says: 'To speak of giving rise to the aspiration for enlightenment is precisely to speak of the mind that vows to become a buddha; the mind that vows to become a buddha is precisely the mind that vows to liberate sentient beings; and the mind that vows to liberate sentient beings is precisely the mind that gathers sentient beings in, bringing them to birth in the buddha's land.'
"One who vows to be born in the pure land must also be equipped with two further practices: first, one must keep entirely apart from three things that obstruct the gate of bodhi; second, one must attain three things that accord with the gate of bodhi. What are the three things that obstruct the gate of bodhi? First, relying on the gate of wisdom, not to seek one's own pleasure — keeping apart from the mind of self, which clings to and is attached to one's own body; second, relying on the gate of compassion, to draw out the suffering of all sentient beings — keeping apart from a mind that would leave sentient beings unsettled; and third, relying on the gate of skillful means, to hold every sentient being in pity and compassion, wishing to give them ease — keeping apart from a mind that seeks reverence and offerings for oneself. If one can keep apart from these three obstructions to bodhi, one thereby attains the three things that accord with the gate of bodhi: first, a mind of undefiled purity, because one does not seek every kind of pleasure for oneself — bodhi is itself the place of undefiled purity, and if one seeks pleasure for oneself, one defiles one's own body and mind and obstructs the gate of bodhi; this is why a mind of undefiled purity accords with the gate of bodhi. Second, a mind of settled purity, for the sake of drawing out the suffering of sentient beings — the aspiration for enlightenment is itself the place of settling and stilling every sentient being in purity, and if one does not set one's mind on drawing every sentient being out of the suffering of birth and death, one thereby goes against the gate of bodhi; this is why a mind of settled purity accords with the gate of bodhi. Third, a mind of joyful purity, wishing every sentient being to attain great bodhi and nirvāṇa — bodhi and nirvāṇa are themselves the place of ultimate, constant joy, and if one does not set one's mind on bringing every sentient being to that ultimate, constant joy, one thereby obstructs the gate of bodhi. And by what cause is this very bodhi attained? It must come about through being born in the pure land, forever unseparated from the Buddha there, and, having attained the acceptance of non-arising, saving suffering beings amid the land of birth and death — compassion and wisdom thoroughly fused within, settled and yet constantly active, at ease and without obstruction: this is itself the mind of bodhi. This is the meaning of the vow to be reborn.
"Second, as to what is meant by the mind of joyful aspiration and longing: one hopes and gives rise to thoughts bound up with Amitābha Buddha — whether his Dharma-body, or his reward-body, and the rest — his golden radiant light and his eighty-four thousand marks, each mark possessing eighty-four thousand excellent features, each feature emitting eighty-four thousand rays of light, constantly illuminating the Dharma-realm and gathering in every being mindful of the Buddha. One should also contemplate that pure land's adornment with the seven treasures and its wondrous bliss and the rest, in full as set out in the Immeasurable Life Sūtra, the Contemplation Sūtra's sixteen contemplations, and so on, constantly practicing the samādhi of buddha-recitation, together with giving, precepts, cultivation, and the rest — dedicating every wholesome practice entirely to all sentient beings, that all may together be reborn in that land with them, so that rebirth there becomes certain. This is what is meant by the gate of aspiration."
Treatise on Ten Doubts About the Pure Land (Complete)
Chengyu identifies the "three things that obstruct the gate of bodhi" and their three counterparts as a direct citation from Vasubandhu's own Rebirth Treatise, with Zhiyi's exegesis laid immediately underneath it — "above is the treatise's own text, below is the Great Master's own explanation," as he puts it, marking the seam between quoted source and commentary that the base text leaves unmarked. He also flags the shape of the argument: of the three accordances, only the first is a matter of one's own conduct, while the latter two are explicitly aimed at transforming others — a structure that keeps the whole of Doubt 10's practical instruction tethered to the same point Doubt 1 opened the treatise with, that a bodhisattva's own liberation and the liberation of others were never two separate projects.
Chengyu closes his commentary on the whole treatise with its longest sustained passage in his own voice, a defense of buddha-recitation against a criticism evidently current in his own time. Two approaches to contemplating the Buddha both lead to realization, he says: the approach of no-thought, a true-suchness samādhi that lets go of every mental object entirely, and the approach of having-thought, the samādhi of buddha-recitation, in which one holds the Buddha's bodies and land in mind with a fully absorbed, unwavering focus. "People of today," he writes, "value no-thought alone, and do not understand having-thought" — practitioners should honestly examine, in themselves, which of the two approaches actually corresponds to their own capacity, "rather than presuming to praise one and condemn the other against the sages' own words. As a person drinking water knows for himself whether it is cold or warm, do not simply imitate others in prizing no-thought alone." He reserves his sharpest words for those who dismiss buddha-recitation outright while unable themselves to sit in settled contemplation for long: minds still crowded with the three poisons, spreading false claims to deceive the ignorant, and "destroying others' wholesome roots by recklessly setting up this false opposition — no offense could be greater." His own closing charge to the reader is plain: "the road to rebirth is level and easy to walk. I urge those who come after to examine truth from falsehood with care, and not to pass a single life in vain."
Chen Guan's Postscript (1093)
淨土十疑論後序
人心無常,法亦無定,心法萬差,其本在此。信此則遍信,《華嚴》所以說十信;疑此則遍疑,智者所以說十疑。出疑入信,一入永入,不離於此,得究竟處。淨土者,究竟處也,此處有說法之主名無量壽。此佛說法,未嘗間斷。疑障其耳,則聾而不聞;疑障其心,則昧而不覺,不聞、不覺,安住惡習,讚歎不念,隨喜麁心,妄指蓮胞,以為虛誕。終不自念,此分段身,從何而得?自何而來?胎獄穢濁,真實安在?信憑業識,自隔真際,於一幻境,非彼執此,生生不靈,永絕聖路。
以如是故,釋迦如來,起大慈愍,於穢濁中,發大音聲,讚彼淨土上妙之樂。於生死中,為大船師,載以法船,令趨彼岸,晝夜度生,無有休息。然而彌陀之岸,本無彼此,釋迦之船,實非往來。
譬如一燈分照八鏡,鏡有東西,光影無二。彌陀說法,遍光影中,而釋迦方便,獨指西鏡。故已到彼岸者,乃可以忘彼此;未入法界者,何自而泯東西。於此法中,若未究竟,勿滯方隅,勿分彼此,但當正念,諦信而已。此二聖之意,而智者之所以信也。
信者萬善之母;疑者眾惡之根,能順其母,能耡其根,則向之所謂障緣眾生,聾可復聞、昧可復覺,未出生死得出生死,未生淨土得生淨土;順釋迦之誨往面彌陀,隨彌陀之願來助釋迦;在此而遍歷十方,即西而普入諸鏡。自二聖建立以來,如是之人,如河沙數,云何不信?云何而疑?能自信己,又作方便令諸未信無不信者,此則智者之所以為悲也。
明智大師,中立學智者之道,不順其文而順其悲,所以又印此論,冠以次公之序,予乃申廣其說,以助其傳。
元祐八年七月十一日左宣義郎前簽書鎮東軍節度判官廳公事陳瓘序
The human mind is impermanent, and the Dharma too has no fixed form; the mind and its dharmas differ in ten thousand ways, and their root lies right here. To have faith in this is to have faith in everything — this is why the Avataṃsaka Sūtra teaches the ten faiths; to doubt this is to doubt everything — this is why Zhiyi expounds these ten doubts. To emerge from doubt and enter faith is, once entered, entered forever; not departing from this, one reaches the ultimate place. The pure land is that ultimate place, and in that place there is a lord who expounds the Dharma, named Immeasurable Life. This buddha's expounding of the Dharma has never once ceased. Let doubt obstruct the ear, and one becomes deaf and does not hear it; let doubt obstruct the mind, and one becomes benighted and does not perceive it — and not hearing, not perceiving, one settles comfortably into evil habits, praising without ever being mindful, taking joy in the coarsest impulses of one's own mind, and dismissing, wrongly, the very lotus womb of rebirth as empty fabrication. Never once does such a person reflect: this fragmentary body of mine — where did it come from? From what did it arise? The womb, the prison, the filth and turbidity — where, in truth, does any of it actually stand? Trusting only in one's own karmic consciousness, one cuts oneself off from ultimate reality of one's own accord, clinging to this one illusory realm and rejecting that one — and life after life, one's spiritual capacity dulls further still, forever cut off from the sagely path.
It is for this very reason that the Tathāgata Śākyamuni, rousing his great compassion and pity, raised his great voice amid this turbid and defiled world, praising the supreme and wondrous bliss of that pure land. Amid birth and death, he became the great captain of a ship, carrying beings aboard the Dharma-boat, bringing them to the farther shore, ferrying beings across day and night without a moment's rest. And yet Amitābha's shore has, at root, no "this" or "that" about it at all, and Śākyamuni's ship, in truth, neither comes nor goes anywhere.
It is like a single lamp casting its light, divided, upon eight mirrors: the mirrors may lie to the east or to the west, but the light and its reflected image are never two different things. Amitābha's teaching pervades every reflected light alike, and Śākyamuni's skillful means simply points, for our sake, to the western mirror alone. And so, one who has already reached the farther shore may indeed forget the distinction of "this" and "that" — but how could one who has not yet entered the Dharma-realm, on his own account, erase the difference between east and west? For one who has not yet reached the ultimate within this teaching, one should not linger over direction, nor divide "this" from "that," but should simply hold right mindfulness and true faith, and nothing more. This is the intent of these two sages — and this is exactly why Zhiyi came to have faith in it himself.
Faith is the mother of every good; doubt is the root of every evil. One who can be obedient to that mother, and can uproot that root, finds that the very beings once said to be obstructed and hindered can hear again, though once deaf, and perceive again, though once benighted; that one not yet freed from birth and death can attain freedom from it; that one not yet born in the pure land can attain birth there — following Śākyamuni's teaching, going to behold Amitābha face to face; and following Amitābha's vow, coming back to assist Śākyamuni in turn — remaining right here while passing entirely through the ten directions, and, by turning toward the west alone, entering universally into every mirror at once. Since these two sages first established this teaching, those who have become such people are as numerous as the sands of the river — how, then, could one fail to have faith? How, then, could one still doubt? To have faith in oneself, and then to devise every skillful means so that no one who lacks faith is left without it — this is exactly why Zhiyi, in setting out these ten doubts, did so out of compassion.
The Great Master Mingzhi, standing squarely within the tradition that studies Zhiyi's own path, followed not merely his written words but the compassion behind them — and it is for this reason that he had this treatise printed once more, placing at its head Yang Jie's preface; and I, in turn, have set out this fuller account, to help in its further transmission.
Written on the eleventh day of the seventh month of the eighth year of Yuanyou [1093], by Chen Guan, at the time an official attached to the military command of Zhendong Army.
Collection Complete
This closes the Treatise on Ten Doubts About the Pure Land in full: ten objections, answered one by one, framed by Yang Jie's 1076 preface and Chen Guan's 1093 postscript, and read throughout with Chengyu's tenth-century commentary. Chen Guan's closing image — a single lamp reflected undivided in eight mirrors, Śākyamuni's western pointing a skillful means rather than a limitation on where light actually falls — is as good a summary as any of what the ten doubts, taken together, have been arguing: that seeking a particular pure land, far from narrowing the path, was never in tension with the widest possible view of it at all.
For the full glossary of terms kept consistent across all ten parts, see the translation notes. To start again from the beginning, return to the collection overview.