Fascicle 3, Part 27 · 定善義 第八觀像觀三 · 觀經四帖疏 T1753

"The Mind Itself Creates the Buddha"

This part contains one of this sūtra's single most consequential lines, and Shandao's own unusually direct intervention in how it should — and should not — be understood. Having just explained that sustained attention on each of the Buddha's thirty-two marks causes that mark to appear, he arrives at the line itself, and then does something rare in this commentary: he names a specific misreading and calls it gravely mistaken.

Translator: Ru-Yi Meditation Center Source: Taishō T1753, 觀無量壽佛經疏, by Shandao (善導, 613–681) Fascicle 3 of 4: 定善義 (Meaning of the Contemplative Good)

Attention Creates the Mark It Attends To

Chinese Source

三、從是故汝等下,至從心想生已來,正明結勸利益。此明標心想佛,但作佛解。從頂至足心想不捨,一一觀之無暫休息。或想頂相,或想眉間白毫乃至足下千輪之相。作此想時,佛像端嚴相好具足了然而現。乃由心緣一一相故,即一一相現。心若不緣,眾相不可見。但自心想作,即應心而現。故言是心,即是三十二相也。言八十隨形好者,佛相既現,眾好皆隨也。此正明如來教諸想者具足觀也。

Ru-Yi Translation

Third, from "for this very reason, you" down through "arises from the mind's own contemplative thought," this makes plain the conclusion, exhorting toward this benefit. This makes plain that, fixing the mind upon contemplating the Buddha, one should simply form the understanding of a buddha directly. From the crown of the head down to the very feet, hold this contemplative thought without ever relinquishing it, observing each mark in turn without the slightest pause. One may visualize the mark upon the crown of the head, or the white curl of hair between the brows, on down to the thousand-spoked wheel marks beneath the feet. As this contemplative thought is formed, the Buddha's own image, dignified and excellent, its every mark complete, appears clearly and distinctly. For it is precisely because the mind attends to each and every mark in turn that each and every mark thereby appears — should the mind fail to attend to it, these many marks could never be beheld at all. It is simply that the mind's own contemplative thought creates them, and they appear directly in response to that very mind. Hence it is said that this mind itself is the thirty-two marks. As for the eighty subsidiary marks of physical excellence: once the Buddha's own major marks have appeared, all these subsidiary excellences follow along with them. This makes plain directly the Tathāgata's own teaching to every practitioner of contemplation: to observe him in his own complete fullness.

"This Understanding Is Gravely Mistaken"

Chinese Source

言是心作佛者,依自信心緣相如作也。言是心是佛者,心能想佛,依想佛身而現,即是心佛也。離此心外,更無異佛者也。言諸佛正遍知者,此明諸佛得圓滿無障礙智,作意不作意常能遍知法界之心,但能作想即從汝心想而現,似如生也。或有行者,將此一門之義作唯識法身之觀,或作自性清淨佛性觀者,其意甚錯,絕無少分相似也。既言想像假立三十二相者,真如法界身豈有相而可緣,有身而可取也。然法身無色,絕於眼對,更無類可方,故取虛空以喻法身之體也。又今此觀門等,唯指方立相,住心而取境,總不明無相離念也。如來懸知末代罪濁凡夫,立相住心尚不能得,何況離相而求事者。如似無術通人,居空立舍也。

Ru-Yi Translation

As for "the mind itself creates the Buddha": this means that, relying on one's own faithful mind attending to this mark, one thereby brings it into being, exactly as it is formed. As for "the mind itself is the Buddha": the mind is itself capable of contemplating the Buddha, and, relying on this very contemplation, the Buddha's own body appears — and this is itself the mind-buddha. Apart from this very mind, there exists no other, separate buddha at all. As for "every buddha's own perfect, universal knowledge": this makes plain that every buddha has attained perfect, unobstructed wisdom, and, whether deliberately intended or not, is forever able to know completely the mind of the entire Dharma-realm — so that, the very moment any being forms this contemplative thought, that buddha appears in accordance with that very mind's own thought, as though being born from it directly.

Now, there are practitioners who take the meaning of this single approach and turn it into a contemplation of the Dharma-body according to consciousness-only doctrine, or into a contemplation of an intrinsically pure buddha-nature — but this understanding is gravely mistaken, and bears not the slightest resemblance to what is actually meant here. Since it is already said that this visualized image provisionally establishes the thirty-two marks, how could the true suchness of the Dharma-realm body possibly possess any mark that could be attended to, or any body that could be grasped at all? For the Dharma-body itself is without form or color, entirely beyond anything the eye could behold, with nothing else in kind to which it could ever be compared — and it is for this very reason that empty space itself is taken as an analogy for the very substance of the Dharma-body. Further, this present gate of contemplation, and every other like it, points only to a specific location and establishes a specific mark, settling the mind and grasping this very object — it does not, in any sense, expound the doctrine of formlessness, of thought altogether relinquished. The Tathāgata, foreseeing from afar that the sinful and defiled ordinary beings of this latter age could not even attain settling the mind upon an established mark, how much less, then, could they seek this matter apart from all marks entirely? This would be like someone possessed of no skill or mastery attempting to build a house suspended in empty space.

A note on this correction

This is one of the few places in the entire commentary where Shandao names a rival interpretation and rejects it outright, rather than simply presenting his own reading alongside others. The stakes of the distinction are precise: read as consciousness-only doctrine or as a contemplation of intrinsic buddha-nature, "the mind itself is the Buddha" would point toward an abstract, formless non-duality — the kind of teaching that requires sophisticated philosophical realization to even approach. Shandao insists instead that the sūtra is doing something much more concrete: teaching ordinary, deluded beings to visualize a specific, marked, embodied image, because — as he states without any softening — "the sinful and defiled ordinary beings of this latter age could not even attain settling the mind upon an established mark, how much less, then, could they seek this matter apart from all marks entirely." His closing image, someone with no skill attempting to build a house suspended in empty space, captures the entire argument in a single picture: formless contemplation is not a shortcut available to beings who cannot yet manage a contemplation with form.

This passage sits at the doctrinal center of everything this commentary has been building since Fascicle 1's own argument that the nine grades describe ordinary beings, not sages. The mind that "creates" the Buddha here is not a metaphysical claim about ultimate reality — it is a description of exactly what happens when a practitioner sustains attention on a specific visualized mark: that mark appears, clearly, in direct response to that very attention. Nothing more abstract than that is being claimed, and Shandao takes real care to make sure nothing more abstract is read into it either.

Part 54 Complete

This closes Part 54. Part 55 continues with the practical method that follows from this teaching: a golden image of the Buddha, seated upon the lotus throne, contemplated first with eyes closed and then open, held steady "as though seeing it in the palm of one's own hand," followed by the precise sequence for observing the entire body from crown to sole, and in reverse.

Continue to Part 55 — A Golden Image, Held in Mind →