竹窗隨筆・二筆 · Entries 100–104

Notes Beside the Bamboo Window — Second Collection, Part 9

Continuing the Second Collection (二筆). This section opens a new stretch of the source text and includes a famous gōng'àn about a "ripened plum," a folk parable about King Yama sending repeated warnings of death that go unnoticed, and a careful defense of Chan investigation as genuinely achievable within ordinary human life.

Translator: Ru-Yi Meditation Center Status: complete — all 398 entries translated Commentary guide: 華藏講記組's vernacular commentary (Huazang Study Group)

100. 即心即佛 — Mind Itself Is Buddha

The famous "ripened plum" gōng'àn between Mazu and Damei is read for two possible meanings — one a genuine, unshakeable realization, the other only a rigid clinging to whichever teaching one happened to hear first.

Chinese Source

馬祖謂「即心即佛」,大梅領旨,遂安然住山。後復聞「非心非佛」之說,乃云:「任伊非心非佛,我只是即心即佛。」祖印之曰:「梅子熟也。」世人賞歎梅之妙悟矣!而有二意,不可不辯:直契本原,一信永信,更不為繁名異相之所轉移者,是梅子熟也;如其主先入之言,死在句下,擔麻而棄金者,其為熟,是熟爛之熟,非成熟之熟也。五千退席,昔人謂之「焦芽敗種者」是也。

Ru-Yi Translation

Mazu taught "mind itself is Buddha," and Damei grasped this teaching directly, settling peacefully into mountain seclusion thereafter. Later, hearing that Mazu now taught instead "neither mind nor Buddha," Damei said: "Let him say neither mind nor Buddha — I hold only to mind itself is Buddha." Mazu, hearing this, confirmed him, saying: "The plum is ripe." The world has admired and praised Damei's subtle awakening ever since! And yet there are two possible meanings here, which must not go unexamined: to directly grasp the original source, believing once and believing always, never again swayed by elaborate names and shifting appearances — this is truly "the plum is ripe." But if instead one simply clings to whatever teaching one heard first, dying fixed beneath its words, like the fool who carried hemp on his shoulder and refused to exchange it for gold — then this "ripeness" is only the ripeness of rot, not the ripeness of genuine maturity. The five thousand who rose and left the assembly are exactly what the ancients called "scorched sprouts and rotten seeds."

Reading note — after the Huazang Study Group's commentary

Damei Fachang was a genuine Tang-dynasty disciple of Mazu Daoyi (already discussed for his lineage in entry 55 above), and "the plum is ripe" is one of Chan literature's most celebrated confirmations — Mazu's own pun on Damei's name ("great plum"). The "hemp and gold" parable Zhuhong invokes for the negative reading comes from the Madhyama Āgama: a man who refuses to trade a load of worthless hemp for gold on the road home, purely from stubborn attachment to what he first picked up, arriving home destitute while his more flexible companion arrives wealthy.

101. 世智辯聰有失 — Worldly Cleverness and Eloquence Can Be Lost

An argument that ordinary intelligence and learning offer no lasting refuge, since they can vanish through misfortune, rebirth as an animal, or the simple passage between lives — unlike prajñā-wisdom, which endures.

Chinese Source

世人重聰明、誇博洽、競辭采,然不足恃者,以其有失也。彼學窮百家,文蓋一世,有來生不識一字者;其甚如淳禪師以才藻著名,一跌而起,頓成癡獃,則不待來生;又甚化為異類,則所謂「但念水草,餘無所知」,其可恃安在?惟般若真智,蘊之八識田中,亙古今顛撲不破,縱在迷途,有觸還悟。世俗中人不知此意,無足為怪,出家兒乃以本分事束之高閣,而殫力於外學,可勝歎哉!

Ru-Yi Translation

People of the world greatly value cleverness, boast of broad learning, and compete over literary elegance — and yet none of this can truly be relied upon, because all of it can be lost. Some exhaust their study of every school of thought, their writing surpassing their whole generation, and yet in their next life cannot recognize even a single character. Worse still, consider a certain Chan master named Chun, famous for his brilliant literary talent — he stumbled once, and rising again, instantly became simple-minded, needing no next life at all to lose it. Worse yet, one might be reborn as an animal entirely, of whom the sutra says: "thinking only of water and grass, knowing nothing else at all" — where, then, would all that cleverness one once relied upon have gone?

Only genuine prajñā-wisdom, stored within the eighth consciousness, endures unbroken through past and present alike — even lost within delusion, the moment the right condition touches it, awakening returns. It is no wonder that ordinary worldly people fail to understand this — but that monks should set aside their own fundamental task and instead exhaust all their effort on external learning is truly something to lament!

Reading note — after the Huazang Study Group's commentary

The line "thinking only of water and grass, knowing nothing else at all" is drawn directly from the Lotus Sutra's own warning about the karmic consequence of slandering that scripture, describing rebirth as a beast of burden; the "eighth consciousness" is the ālayavijñāna of Yogācāra psychology, already introduced in this collection's earlier discussion of the "King-and-Retinue Flower" (entry 46 above) as the storehouse in which every seed of past action is kept.

102. 好奇 — Fondness for the Strange

A warning that intelligence itself makes a person more vulnerable to occult and mystical charlatans, illustrated by the ancient legend of coastal mystics who claimed knowledge of immortal islands.

Chinese Source

聰明人多好奇,好奇者多受惑。蓋好奇之名既彰,則所謂海上燕齊迂怪之士,競以其術進,駕神託仙,可喜可愕,遂深入而酷信之。至於白首無成,臨終不驗,始悵然悔恨,亦晚矣!雖然,猶愈於沒世而終不返者也。今日之悔恨,當來之不受惑可知也。

Ru-Yi Translation

Clever people are often drawn to the strange, and those drawn to the strange are often deceived by it. Once a reputation for loving the strange spreads, the eccentric charlatans of the world — like the wandering mystics of ancient Yan and Qi along the coast — compete to offer their own arts, claiming communion with immortals, delighting and astonishing all who hear them, until one sinks in deeply and believes it utterly. Only when white-haired and near death, having accomplished nothing, with not a single proof ever having come true, does one finally feel real regret — and by then it is far too late! And yet even this is still better than dying without ever once turning back at all. Today's regret is proof enough that one will not be deceived by such things again.

Reading note — after the Huazang Study Group's commentary

The coastal mystics of Yan and Qi are a genuine feature of Warring States and early imperial history — court-sponsored expeditions repeatedly sent to find the immortal isles of Penglai in the Bohai Sea, most famously Qin Shi Huang's dispatch of the alchemist Xu Fu with thousands of young men and women in search of the elixir of immortality, an expedition from which Xu Fu, by the traditional account, never returned; Zhuhong's use of this specific, documented historical folly gives real weight to what might otherwise read as a purely generic warning against superstition.

103. 無常信 — The Message of Impermanence

A folk parable in which King Yama insists he sent repeated warnings of approaching death — through failing eyesight and hearing in old age, and through the deaths of neighbors at every age in youth — that simply went unnoticed.

Chinese Source

諺有警世語,謂一老人死見閻王,咎王不早與通信。王言:「吾信數矣!汝目漸昏,一信也。汝耳漸聾,二信也。汝齒漸損,三信也。汝百體日益衰,信不知其幾也!」然此特為老人言耳。今更續之,一少年亦咎王云:「吾目明、耳聰、齒利、百體強健,王胡不以信及我?」王言:「亦有信及君,君自不察耳。東鄰有四五十而亡者乎?西鄰有三二十而亡者乎?更有不及十歲,與孩提乳哺而亡者乎?非信乎?」良馬見鞭影而行;必俟錐入於膚者,駑駘也。何嗟及矣!

Ru-Yi Translation

There is a proverb meant to warn the world: an old man died and appeared before King Yama, and blamed the king for not sending word of his death sooner. The king answered: "I sent you word many times! When your eyes grew steadily dimmer, that was one message. When your ears grew steadily deafer, that was a second message. When your teeth grew steadily looser, that was a third message. As every part of your body grew weaker day by day, who could count how many messages I sent you!" But this was addressed only to an old man.

Let me extend the story further: a young man, too, once blamed the king, saying: "My eyes are sharp, my hearing keen, my teeth strong, my whole body healthy — why did the king send no message to me?" The king answered: "I sent you messages too — you simply failed to notice them. Has your eastern neighbor not had someone die at forty or fifty? Has your western neighbor not had someone die at twenty or thirty? Has there not been someone who died before even reaching ten years old, or an infant who died still at the breast? Were these not messages as well?" A fine horse runs at the mere shadow of the whip; only an inferior nag waits until the goad actually pierces its flesh. How could one possibly wait for that before feeling any grief at all!

Reading note — after the Huazang Study Group's commentary

Zhuhong explicitly marks his own contribution here: the original proverb addressed only the old, and he adds the young man's exchange himself ("let me extend the story further") to close the obvious loophole a younger reader might otherwise take from it — a rare moment where he flags his own authorial addition to a piece of folk material rather than presenting it as received whole.

104. 參禪非人世中事 — Chan Investigation Is Not a Matter for This World

A careful reconciliation of two seemingly contradictory sayings — that only the human realm allows real spiritual progress, and that Chan cannot be spoken of "within this world" — clarifying that the second saying targets hypocrisy, not the human condition itself.

Chinese Source

先德有言:「參禪不是人世中說得的事。」或疑:「裴丞相謂六道之中,可以整心慮、趨菩提者,唯人道為能耳。果如前言,禪將無地可參矣!」曰:「裴論良是。今此言,為喫得肉已飽,來尋僧說禪者發也;又為僧之口般若、身阿蘭而心朝市者發也。且安居五欲之場,坐證一乘之果,人世中有此大便宜事,誰不為之?得非所謂世間那有揚州鶴乎?」願毋以此言自諉,參禪定是人世中說得的事,特患無志耳,有志者事竟成。

Ru-Yi Translation

A teacher of old once said: "Chan investigation is not something that can be spoken of within the ordinary human world." Someone raised a doubt about this, saying: "Chancellor Pei Xiu held that among the six realms, only the human realm allows one to order one's own thoughts and advance toward bodhi. If the earlier saying is really true, then Chan would have nowhere at all left to be investigated!"

I would answer: "Chancellor Pei's own point is entirely correct. The earlier saying was directed instead at those who, having eaten their fill of meat and wine, then go seeking out monks to discuss Chan with — and at monks whose mouths speak of prajñā while their bodies dwell in a monastery, yet whose hearts still wander the marketplace of fame and profit. If one could simply dwell at ease amid the five desires and still realize the fruit of the One Vehicle while doing so, what a tremendous bargain that would be for this world — who would not want it? Is this not exactly what is meant by 'where in this world could there possibly be a crane to ride to Yangzhou'?"

I hope no one will use this saying as an excuse to avoid diligent practice. Chan investigation, and thereby seeing one's own nature, is most certainly something that can be spoken of, and accomplished, within this very human world — the only real danger is lacking the will for it. Where there is a will, the thing is eventually accomplished.

Reading note — after the Huazang Study Group's commentary

Pei Xiu (791–864) was a genuine Tang chancellor and devout lay Buddhist, whose own preface to Guifeng Zongmi's commentary was already cited for its careful, verified praise in entry 65 above; the phrase "where in this world could there possibly be a crane to ride to Yangzhou" comes from a Song-dynasty parable about four men each naming an ambition — riches, high office, flight on a crane, or all three combined — mocking the fantasy of having every good thing at once with none of the trade-offs, which Zhuhong applies here to the fantasy of full worldly indulgence alongside instant enlightenment.