Notes Beside the Bamboo Window — Second Collection, Part 10
Continuing the Second Collection (二筆). This section pairs two entries distinguishing true renunciation from its outward form with Zhuhong's own quietly regretful account of never having had the chance to study long under a single great teacher — and closes with his admiring portrait of Master Yinzong, who gave up his own eminent position to become the Sixth Patriarch's student.
105. 出家一 — Leaving the Household Life, First Note
A distinction between merely leaving one's own front gate and genuinely leaving the burning house of the three realms — arguing that only the latter deserves the name of true renunciation.
先德有言:「出家者,大丈夫之事,非將相之所能為也。」夫將以武功定禍亂,相以文學興太平,天下大事皆出將相之手,而曰出家非其所能,然則出家豈細故哉!今剃髮染衣,便謂出家。噫!是不過出兩片大門之家也,非出三界火宅之家也。出三界家而後名為大丈夫也;猶未也,與三界眾生同出三界,而後名為大丈夫也!古尊宿歌云:「最勝兒,出家好,出家兩字人知少。」最勝兒者,大丈夫也。大丈夫不易得,何怪乎知「出家」兩字者少也。
A teacher of old once said: "Leaving the household life is a matter for a great man — something even a general or a chancellor could not accomplish." A general pacifies chaos through military achievement; a chancellor brings peace through literary and administrative skill; the great affairs of the realm all pass through the hands of generals and chancellors — and yet it is said that leaving the household life is beyond even their capacity. How, then, could leaving the household life possibly be a trivial matter! Today, people shave their heads and don dyed robes and call this leaving home. Alas! This is nothing more than leaving through the two panels of one's own front gate — it is not leaving the burning house of the three realms at all. Only one who leaves the household of the three realms deserves to be called a great man — and even this is not yet enough; only one who leaves the three realms together with all sentient beings across the three realms may truly be called a great man! An old verse by a venerable elder sings: "Finest of sons, how good it is to leave home — and yet how few truly understand these two words, 'leaving home.'" The "finest of sons" is exactly this great man. A great man is not easily found — small wonder, then, that so few understand what "leaving home" truly means.
The "burning house" is the Lotus Sutra's own famous parable of the three realms — a house on fire that its heedless children refuse to leave, mistaking their games for safety; Zhuhong's escalating definition of "great man" here (first beyond generals and chancellors, then beyond mere personal escape from the three realms, finally requiring that all sentient beings escape together) mirrors the same rhetorical widening he uses elsewhere in this collection, such as the successive expansions of "this Way" in entry 47 above.
106. 出家二 — Leaving the Household Life, Second Note
A warning that the good intentions of early monastic life often erode into worldly accumulation over time, and that a second, harder renunciation — of affliction itself — must follow the first.
人初出家,雖志有大小,莫不具一段好心;久之,又為因緣名利所染,遂復營宮室、飾衣服、置田產、畜徒眾、多積金帛、勤作家緣,與俗無異。經稱:「一人出家,波旬怖懼。」今若此,波旬可以酌酒相慶矣!好心出家者,快須著眼看破。曾見深山中苦行僧,一出山來,被數十箇信心男女歸依供養,遂埋沒一生,況其大者乎!古謂:「必須重離煩惱之家,再割塵勞之網。」是出家以後之出家也。出前之家易,出後之家難,予為此曉夜惶悚。
When people first leave the household life, however great or small their aspiration may be, none lack some measure of good intention at the start. But over time, entangled again by circumstance and the pursuit of fame and profit, they end up building elaborate residences, adorning themselves in fine robes, acquiring land, gathering disciples, accumulating gold and silk, and busying themselves diligently with household affairs — no different at all from ordinary laypeople. A sutra says: "When even a single person leaves the household life, Māra himself trembles in fear." If this is what leaving home has become today, then Māra might as well pour himself a cup of wine and celebrate! Whoever has left home with a truly good intention ought to see through all of this, and quickly.
I once saw an ascetic monk practicing austerities deep in the mountains — the moment he came down from the mountain, dozens of devoted men and women took refuge with him and showered him with offerings, and his whole life was buried and lost because of it. How much more so, then, for someone facing even greater temptations! The ancients said: "One must leave the household of afflictions all over again, and cut once more through the net of worldly toil." This is the leaving-home that comes after leaving home. Leaving the earlier household is easy; leaving the later one is hard — and it is for this that I remain, day and night, in a state of real dread.
The phrase Zhuhong quotes here — "one must leave the household of afflictions all over again, and cut once more through the net of worldly toil" — comes from the Song-dynasty master Changlu Zongze's own essay urging Chan investigation; pairing it with the earlier definition of true renunciation in entry 105 gives this short pair of entries a clear structure — first, what leaving home actually means; second, why even a sincere start at it can quietly fail over time.
107. 得悟人正宜往生淨土 — One Who Has Attained Awakening Should Especially Seek Rebirth in the Pure Land
A response to a Chan practitioner's challenge that self-realization should make seeking rebirth in the Pure Land unnecessary — arguing that genuine awakening, far from making the vow unnecessary, makes it unshakeable.
或問:「某甲向修淨土,有禪者曰:『但悟自佛即已,何必外求他佛而願往生?』此意何如?」予謂此實最上開示,但執之亦能有誤。請以喻明,假使有人穎悟同於顏子,而百里千里之外,有聖如夫子者倡道於其間,七十子、三千賢相與周旋焉,汝聞其名,往而見之,未必不更有長處;而自恃穎悟,拒不覲謁,可乎?雖然得悟,不願往生,敢保老兄未悟在。何者?天如有言:「汝但未悟。若悟,則汝淨土之生,萬牛不能挽矣!」深矣哉言乎!
Someone asked: "I have always practiced the Pure Land path, but a certain Chan practitioner told me: 'Simply awaken to your own buddha-nature, and that is enough — why seek some other buddha outside yourself and vow rebirth in his land?' What do you think of this?" I would say: this is indeed the highest kind of instruction — and yet clinging to it rigidly can also lead one astray. Let me explain with an analogy: suppose someone's own intelligence matched Yan Hui's, and yet, a hundred or a thousand miles away, a sage as great as Confucius himself were teaching the Way there, with seventy disciples and three thousand worthies gathered around him in fellowship — hearing of his reputation, one goes to see him, and surely gains something more from it; but suppose instead, relying on one's own intelligence, one refused outright even to pay him a visit — would that be right? Even should someone have genuinely attained awakening, and yet still refuse to seek rebirth in the Pure Land, I would venture to guarantee that this fellow has not truly awakened at all. Why? Master Tianru said: "You have simply not yet awakened. Were you truly awakened, then ten thousand oxen together could not drag you back from being reborn in the Pure Land!" How profound these words are!
Master Tianru's line is drawn from the same Questions and Answers on the Pure Land already cited in entry 92 above for its rebuke of those who dismiss the Pure Land as fit only for the simple-minded — this entry pairs naturally with that one, both defending the Pure Land teaching's depth, but from opposite directions: entry 92 against those who think it too shallow for the wise, this one against those who think genuine wisdom makes it unnecessary.
108. 參禪 — Chan Investigation
A demonstration that the technical vocabulary of Chan "investigation" already appears in the Śūraṅgama Sūtra itself, followed by a Tang master's own vivid instructions on genuine effort — and a warning against merely intellectualizing them.
僧有恆言曰:「小疑小悟,大疑大悟,不疑不悟。」疑之為言參也。然「參禪」二字起於何時?或曰經未之有也,予曰有之。《楞嚴》云:「當在此中,精研妙明。」又曰:「內外研究。」又曰:「研究深遠。」又曰:「研究精極。」非參乎?自後尊宿教人看公案、起疑情,皆從此生也。而言之最為詳明者,莫如鵝湖大義禪師。其言曰:「若人靜坐不用功,何年及第悟心空?」曰:「直須提起吹毛利,要剖西來第一義。」曰:「若還默默恣如愚,知君未解做工夫。」曰:「剔起眼睛豎起眉,反覆看渠渠是誰。」如是言之,不一而足,參禪人當書諸紳。雖然,若向語句中推測穿鑿,情識上卜度摶量,則又錯會所謂用功、所謂剖、所謂反覆看之意矣!則與靜坐默默者,事不同而其病同矣,不可不辯!
Monks have a common saying: "Small doubt, small awakening; great doubt, great awakening; no doubt, no awakening." This "doubt" is what is meant by investigation. But when did the term "Chan investigation" first arise? Some say the sutras never mention it — I would say they do. The Śūraṅgama Sūtra says: "One should, within this very state, minutely investigate the subtle and luminous." It also says: "investigate both within and without." It also says: "investigate deeply and thoroughly." It also says: "investigate to the utmost point of refinement." Is this not exactly investigation? All the later venerable masters who taught students to contemplate gōng'àn and give rise to a sense of doubt trace their teaching back to exactly this.
Of all who have spoken of this most fully and clearly, none surpasses Master Ehu Dayi. He said: "If a person sits still without truly applying effort, in what year will he ever pass the test and awaken to the emptiness of his own mind?" He also said: "One must lift up the sharp blade that can cut through even a single hair, and use it to cleave open the ultimate meaning of the Patriarch's coming from the West." He also said: "If you remain silently indulging your own foolishness, know that you have not yet understood how to truly apply effort." He also said: "Widen your eyes and raise your brows, and look again and again — just who is this 'he'?" Sayings of this kind abound, and a student of Chan ought to bind them fast to his own sash to remember always.
And yet, should one instead try to work out these very words and phrases through mere intellectual speculation, calculating and guessing through the discriminating mind, one would again completely misunderstand what is meant by "applying effort," by "cleaving open," and by "looking again and again"! This would then share the very same fault as the one who merely sits silently — different in outward form, but identical in its underlying sickness. This distinction must not go unexamined!
The four Śūraṅgama phrases Zhuhong cites all come from the sutra's own ninth fascicle, in its extended warning about the subtle demonic states a meditator may mistake for genuine attainment as the skandhas begin to dissolve; Ehu Dayi was a real Tang-dynasty disciple of Mazu Daoyi, and his "Inscription on Seated Meditation," quoted at length here, remains one of the most direct and often-cited exhortations to genuine rather than merely performed Chan effort in the tradition.
109. 印宗法師 — Master Yinzong
An admiring portrait of the already-eminent Master Yinzong, who set aside his own standing and status to become a student of the still-unordained Sixth Patriarch.
六祖既受黃梅心印,隱於屠獵傭賤一十六年。後至印宗法師講席,出風旛語,印宗聞而延入,即為剃染,禮請陞座說法。人知六祖之為龍天推出矣,未知印宗之不可及也。其自言:「某甲講經,猶如瓦礫;仁者論義,猶如真金。」夫印宗久談經論,已居然先輩大法師矣,而使我慢之情未忘,勝負之心尚在,安能尊賢重道,舍己從人,一至於是乎?六祖固古佛之流亞,而印宗亦六祖之儔類也。聖賢聚會,豈偶然而已哉?!
After the Sixth Patriarch had already received the mind-seal at Huangmei, he hid himself among butchers and hunters, working as a lowly laborer, for sixteen full years. He later arrived at Master Yinzong's own lecture hall, and spoke his famous words on the flag and the wind; Yinzong, hearing this, invited him inside, personally shaved his head and gave him monastic robes, and respectfully invited him to ascend the platform and teach. Everyone knows that the Sixth Patriarch was, so to speak, pushed forward by the dragon spirits and heavenly guardians themselves — but few realize how truly extraordinary Yinzong himself was. Yinzong himself said: "What I teach is like a shard of broken tile; what you, sir, expound is like genuine gold." And yet Yinzong had already spent long years lecturing on the sutras, and was already, by that time, a senior and eminent Dharma master in his own right — and still, the feeling of pride and the desire to win out over others had not been overcome in him, and yet he was able to honor a worthy teacher and revere the Way, setting his own position aside to follow another, to this very degree? The Sixth Patriarch was surely a manifestation in the lineage of ancient buddhas — and Yinzong, too, must have belonged to that very same company. Could such a meeting of sages possibly have been a mere accident?
The "words on the flag and the wind" refer to the celebrated exchange where two monks argued whether a temple banner moved because of the wind or the flag itself, and Huineng — still an unordained layman at the time — settled the dispute by declaring that neither the wind nor the flag was moving, but their own minds; Yinzong's response, immediately inviting this stranger to shave his head and take the teaching seat, is what makes this one of the more remarkable acts of intellectual humility recorded in Chan history — a senior, established master publicly subordinating himself to an unknown layman on the spot.
110. 親師 — Staying Close to One's Teacher
A rare, wistful piece of autobiography: Zhuhong reflects on how illness and his own teacher's early death prevented him from ever studying long under a single great master, unlike the disciples he admires who spent decades at their teachers' sides.
古人心地未通,不遠千里求師問道,既得真師,於是拗折拄杖,高掛缽囊,久久親近。太上,則阿難一生侍佛,嗣後歷代諸賢,其久參知識者,未易悉舉。只如慈明老人下二尊宿,一則楊岐,輔佐終世;一則清素,執侍一十三年,是以晨咨暮炙,浹耳洽心,終得其道以成大器。而予出家時晚,又色力羸弱,氣不助志。先師為度出家,便相別去。方外行腳,所到之處,或阻機會,或罹病緣,皆乍住而已,遂至今日,白首無知,抱愚守拙。嗟乎!予不能於杏壇泗水濟濟多士中,作將命童子,而乃於三家村裏充教讀師,可勝歎哉!
The ancients, before their own minds had penetrated the truth, did not hesitate to travel a thousand miles in search of a teacher and the Way; and once they had found a genuine teacher, they broke their own walking staff, hung up their alms bag, and stayed close to that teacher for a very long time. In the most ancient times, Ānanda himself served the Buddha in person for his entire life; and among the many worthies of every later generation, those who remained long at a spiritual guide's side are too numerous to list individually. Consider only the two venerable disciples beneath Elder Ciming: one, Yangqi, assisted him for his entire life; the other, Qingsu, attended upon him personally for thirteen full years — and it was through this daily questioning morning and night, this teaching absorbed through the very ears and heart, that they finally attained the Way and became great vessels of the Dharma.
I myself left the household life late in life, and my own body was already frail and weak, my vital energy no longer able to keep pace with my aspirations. My own teacher passed away soon after ordaining me, and I parted from him almost at once. Traveling afterward as a wandering monk, wherever I went I found either no real opportunity, or fell ill, and could only stay briefly in any one place — and so it has come to this day: white-haired now, and still ignorant, clinging only to my own foolish, clumsy ways. Alas! I was never able to serve, even as some minor errand-boy, among the crowded ranks of worthy students gathered at some great teacher's own lecture hall — and instead I have spent my life as a mere village schoolteacher in some remote corner. How can this not be a matter for real lament!
Yangqi Fanghui and Qingsu were both genuine disciples of the Song master Shishuang Ciming, and went on to found or transmit two of Chan's most influential later lineages; Zhuhong's closing self-deprecation — comparing his own life's work to that of "a mere village schoolteacher" — is a striking understatement from the very founder of Yunqi monastery and author of a body of writing, including this collection itself, that would shape Ming Buddhism for centuries, and reads as a genuine, unguarded expression of regret rather than false modesty.