Notes Beside the Bamboo Window — Third Collection, Part 3
Continuing the Third Collection (三筆). This section takes aim at premature retreat and premature teaching alike — arguing that solitary retreat, extensive travel to seek instruction, and Chan investigation itself all belong properly to the far side of genuine realization, not as shortcuts toward it.
11. 年少閉關 — Retreat for the Young
A sharp challenge to young monks entering solitary retreat prematurely, arguing that even the most advanced practitioners in history — Sudhana, Zhaozhou, Xuefeng, Gaofeng — earned their eventual seclusion only after decades of active seeking, never before it.
閉關之說,古未有也,後世乃有之;所以養道,非所以造道也。且夫已發菩提大心者,猶尚航海梯山,冒風霜於百郡;不契隨他一語者,方且挑包頂笠,蹈雲水於千山。八旬行腳,老更驅馳;九上三登,不厭勤苦。爾何人斯,安坐一室,人來參我,我弗求人耶?昔高峰坐死關於張公洞,依巖架屋,懸處虛空,如鳥在巢,人罕覯之者;然大悟以後事耳!如其圖安逸而緘封自便,則斷乎不可。
The practice of solitary retreat did not exist in ancient times — it arose only in later generations, and its purpose is to nurture the Way, not to forge it in the first place. Consider: even one who has already given rise to the great bodhi-mind, like Sudhana, still crossed oceans and scaled mountains, braving wind and frost across a hundred prefectures; and one who has not yet grasped even a single word like "let it go with him" must still shoulder his pack and don his rain hat, traversing a thousand mountains as a wandering monk. Zhaozhou, at eighty years old, still traveled on foot, growing only more diligent with age; Xuefeng climbed Dongshan nine times and Touzi three times, never wearying of the hardship. Who, then, do you think you are, sitting at ease within a single room, expecting others to come seek instruction from you, while you yourself seek instruction from no one?
Long ago, Gaofeng sat through his own "death barrier" retreat in the Zhang Gong Cave, building his hut against the cliff face, suspended in open space like a bird in its nest, seen by scarcely anyone at all — but this happened only after his own great awakening! If retreat is undertaken merely to seek comfort and seal oneself away for private convenience, this is absolutely not permissible.
Sudhana (Sudhana the Youth) is the pilgrim of the Flower Ornament Sutra's own "Entry into the Dharma Realm" chapter, whose visits to fifty-three teachers across many kingdoms were already the organizing subject of an earlier translation project on this site; Gaofeng Yuanmiao's own fifteen-year "death barrier" retreat in a cave on Mount Tianmu is a genuine, documented episode already referenced in the Second Collection's account of his own awakening (entry 125 above) — Zhuhong's point here is precise: the retreat came only after, and as the fruit of, that earlier awakening, not as a substitute for it.
12. 八旬行腳 — Traveling on Foot at Eighty
A correction of a common misreading of a famous verse about Zhaozhou's own tireless travels — people quote only its final line to justify their own inertia, ignoring the verse's actual point about restless, unfinished practice.
古有頌云:「趙州八十猶行腳,祇為心頭未悄然,及至歸家無一事,始知虛費草鞋錢。」今人不思其前二句,而執其末句,謂道在目前,行腳徒勞耳,而引不越嶺不出關者為證。噫!幸自反觀,已歸家否?無一事否?有如尚滯半途,匆匆多事,則何但八旬,直饒百歲千歲,乃至萬歲,正好多買草鞋,遍歷天涯,未許駐足在。
An old verse says: "Zhaozhou, at eighty, still traveled on foot, simply because his own mind had not yet found true stillness; only once he had returned home with nothing left to do did he finally realize how much he had wasted on straw sandals." People today never consider the verse's first two lines, but cling instead to its final line, claiming that the Way lies right before their own eyes, that traveling to seek instruction is entirely wasted effort — and cite Xuansha's never crossing the mountain ridge, or Baofu's never leaving his own gate, as their proof.
Ah! I hope such people will turn and examine themselves honestly: have you truly returned home already? Do you truly have nothing left to do? If you remain still stuck somewhere along the road, your mind restless and full of unfinished business, then it will not matter whether you live to eighty, or a hundred, or a thousand, or even ten thousand years — you would do far better to buy more straw sandals and travel to the very ends of the earth, without allowing yourself to rest even for a moment.
Xuansha Shibei and Baofu Congzhan are both genuine Tang-Five Dynasties Chan masters, disciples of Xuefeng Yicun, whose own reputations for never leaving their home mountains were themselves the product of decades of prior travel and study, not a shortcut around it — Zhuhong's complaint here is directed specifically at readers who cite their eventual stillness while skipping the labor that earned it, the same rhetorical error already targeted from the opposite angle in entry 11 immediately above.
13. 講宗 — Lecturing on the Chan School
A paradoxical but carefully argued claim that formal lecturing on Chan — unlike lecturing on the sutras, vinaya, and treatises — actually obscures rather than clarifies its own teaching, since Chan requires personal investigation rather than explanation.
宗門之壞,講宗者壞之也。或問:「講以明宗,曷言乎壞之也?」予曰:經律論有義路,不講則不明;宗門無義路,講之則反晦,將使其參而自得之耳。故曰:「任從滄海變,終不為君通。」又曰:「我若與汝說破,汝向後罵我在。」今講者翻成套子話矣!西來意不明,正坐此耳。
The decline of the Chan school has been brought about by those who lecture on it. Someone asked: "Lecturing is meant to clarify the school's own essential teaching — how can you say this has brought about its decline?" I answered: "The sutras, vinaya, and treatises all follow a logical progression that can be explained — without lecturing, they remain unclear. But Chan itself follows no such logical progression at all — to lecture on it only makes it more obscure still, since a student must reach genuine realization entirely through his own investigation." This is why it is said: "Even should the vast ocean itself transform into mulberry fields, I will still never explain this for your sake." It is also said: "Should I explain this plainly for you now, you would only curse me for it later." Today's lecturers, by contrast, have turned everything into stock, formulaic phrases — and this is exactly why the Patriarch's own meaning from the West remains unclear, and why the school itself has declined.
The first quotation is Wumen Huikai's own verse commentary on Nanquan's refusal to explain "the teaching that cannot be told to anyone," from the Wumenguan (Gateless Barrier) — the same collection whose forty-eight koans, compiled by the master already discussed for his own famous "not this, not this" teaching in the Second Collection (entries 79 and 86 above), remains one of Chan's central textbooks precisely because it refuses to explain its own cases away.
14. 教人參禪 — Teaching People to Investigate Chan
A vivid martial analogy against indiscriminately teaching Chan investigation to unprepared students, ending in Zhuhong's own characteristically self-deprecating refusal to claim readiness for the task himself.
參禪人之誤,教參禪者誤之也。或問:「教人參禪,是欲起直指之道於殘燈將燼之日,曷言乎誤之也?」予曰:「道雖人人本具,而亦人人所難;苟非利根上智,卒莫邊岸,奈何概以施之?譬如募士者,得孱孱懦怯,僅可執旗司鼓;而授之以朱亥之鎚、雲長之刀、典韋之戟,其不振掉而顛蹶者幾希矣,安望其有斬將擒酋、攻城破壘之功乎?其或自亦纔離上大人丘乙己,而教人以制科文字,亦舛矣!」或問:「於子何如?」答曰:「老僧正讀上大人未熟在。」
The faults of Chan students are caused by those who teach Chan investigation. Someone asked: "Teaching people Chan investigation is meant to revive the direct-pointing path at this late hour, when its lamp is nearly extinguished — how can you call this a fault?" I answered: "Though the Way is something everyone already possesses in full, it is also something everyone finds genuinely difficult to realize; unless one has truly sharp faculties and superior wisdom, one will never come close to the far shore at all — how, then, can this be taught indiscriminately to everyone alike? It is like recruiting soldiers: if the recruits are timid and feeble, they can only be given a flag to hold or a drum to beat; but hand them Zhu Hai's iron mallet, Lord Guan's great blade, or Dian Wei's long halberd, and scarcely any of them would fail to tremble and collapse under the weight — how, then, could one possibly hope for them to slay enemy generals, capture chieftains, and storm fortified cities? Or consider someone who has only just learned to write the simplest primer characters, and yet already presumes to teach others how to compose examination essays — this too is a grave error!"
Someone asked: "What, then, do you yourself do?" I answered: "This old monk is still working on mastering that very same simple primer, and has not yet even managed to learn it thoroughly."
Zhu Hai, Lord Guan (Guan Yu, already discussed for his cross-religious veneration in the Second Collection's entry 76 above), and Dian Wei were all genuine historical figures of extraordinary physical strength — Zhu Hai a Warring States assassin who killed a general with a forty-pound iron mallet, Dian Wei a Three Kingdoms bodyguard famous for wielding twin halberds no ordinary soldier could lift — Zhuhong's closing self-deprecation, claiming he himself has not yet mastered the schoolchild's primer, directly echoes his own earlier refusal to claim the title of abbot in entry 3 of this same collection.