Notes Beside the Bamboo Window — Third Collection, Part 18
Continuing the Third Collection (三筆). A brother's brief past-life memory prompts a careful distinction between accidental recollection and genuine spiritual power, a survey of long-lived eccentrics with wildly different diets undercuts folk theories of longevity in favor of accumulated virtue, and a Suzhou monk's ruinous obsession with alchemical gold serves as a warning against misplaced devotion.
80. 宿命 — Past-Life Memory
A brief, unsettling account of a boy who spoke of a past life just before his early death becomes the occasion for a careful distinction between accidental, fleeting recollection and the genuine, stable "past-life knowing" power of real spiritual attainment.
世有偶知宿命者,非必得道者之宿命通也,古今蓋屢有之。總戎楊君為予言,亡兄年十三四時,忽作北人語云:「平日只管道南方好,南方好。」展兩手云:「今生此處來得好,來得好。」問之,則曰:「我山東某處紅廟僧也。」老總戎以為妖,欲撲殺之,遂不敢言。踰年而卒。昔靈樹世世為僧不失通;雲門三生為國王,因不知宿命。豈雲門之賢不及今人乎?故曰偶爾不昧,非通也。今為僧念念在世法中,入胎出胎,安能更記憶前事?求生西方自應汲汲矣。
There are people in the world who happen to know something of a past life, though this is not necessarily the genuine "past-life knowing" power of one who has attained the Way — such cases have occurred repeatedly throughout history. A military commander named Yang once told me of something concerning his own late elder brother: at thirteen or fourteen, the brother suddenly began speaking in a northern accent, saying, "All my life I kept saying the south is good, the south is good" — then, spreading both hands, "To have come to this place in this life was fortunate, so fortunate." When asked what he meant, he replied, "I was a monk of the Red Temple in a certain place in Shandong." The elder Commander Yang, taking this for some demonic possession, wanted to beat it out of him, and from then on the boy never spoke of it again. Within the year, he died.
In ancient times, Chan Master Lingshu remained a monk life after life without ever losing his spiritual powers, while Chan Master Yunmen was a king for three lifetimes, and as a result lost all knowledge of his past lives. Was Yunmen's own wisdom really inferior to that of people today? Hence I say: an occasional flash of clarity about a past life is not the same as the genuine power of past-life knowing. Monks today have their every thought caught up in worldly concerns, cycling through entering and leaving the womb again and again — how could they possibly still remember anything of their former lives? One who truly wishes for this should instead urgently seek rebirth in the Western Pure Land.
Lingshu (Chan Master Ruyin of Lingshu) and Yunmen Wenyan, founder of the Yunmen lineage of Chan and one of its most celebrated masters, are drawn from a well-known Chan anecdote contrasting the two men's very different relationships to their own past lives; Zhuhong's citation of it here is characteristic of his broader habit, visible throughout this collection, of using a specific classical case to sharpen a general point — in this instance, that momentary, involuntary recollection is categorically different from the stable spiritual attainment he elsewhere associates, as in entries 12 and 39 above, with genuine practice toward rebirth in the Pure Land.
81. 龍眼 — Longans
A wry survey of long-lived local eccentrics with wildly different, sometimes eccentric diets — and the contrasting early deaths of Confucius and his favorite disciple — dismantles any simple dietary theory of longevity in favor of accumulated virtue.
宗伯陸公壽九十七而嗜龍眼,龍眼遂價貴一方。又吾鄉一老叟,壽踰宗伯六載而嗜蒸豚。二老母,一嗜米飲,一嗜川椒,壽俱九十以上,旁觀者復效法之。又一老人,清晨服蜜湯一杯;儻其永壽,而諸蜂乏食矣!嗟乎!攝生雖君子所不廢,而死生有命,聖謨洋洋。故夫子僅登古稀,豈其養生之無物?顏淵早夭三十,將無簞食以傷生?而有耄耋期頤,負販於道路者,曾饘粥之不繼者也。則知宗伯以積德延壽,龍眼何與焉!又況乎金仙氏之長生也。
Minister Lu, who lived to the great age of ninety-seven, was fond of longans, and as a result the price of longans in that whole region rose sharply. There was also an old man in my own hometown who outlived the minister by six years and was fond of steamed suckling pig. And two old women, one fond of drinking rice broth, the other of Sichuan pepper, both lived past ninety, and onlookers took to imitating their habits as well. There was also an old man who drank a cup of honey water every morning — if living long enough would guarantee his longevity, the bees themselves would soon run short of food!
Ah! Nurturing one's health is certainly something a noble person does not neglect, and yet life and death are governed by fate, as the sages have amply taught us. Confucius himself lived only to the age traditionally called "rare since antiquity" — was this because he had nothing proper to eat for his health? His disciple Yan Hui died young at thirty — was this because a single bowl of rice harmed his health? And yet there are those who reach eighty, ninety, even a hundred years of age while still peddling goods along the roadside, whose own gruel is never even reliably available. From this we may know that it was Minister Lu's accumulated virtue that extended his life — what did longans have to do with it! How much more true this is of the true, unending life offered by the Golden Immortal's own Pure Land teaching.
Confucius living to roughly seventy and his most gifted disciple Yan Hui dying at around thirty are both genuine, well-attested facts of early Confucian biography; Zhuhong's closing gesture toward "the Golden Immortal's own long life" (a poetic epithet for the Buddha) reframes ordinary longevity — the subject of every anecdote in this entry — as trivial next to the Pure Land's promise of a lifespan without end, a rhetorical move paralleling the same reframing of worldly versus spiritual value found in entry 51 above.
82. 燒煉 — Alchemical Refining
A pointed warning against monks squandering their devotion on the well-known scam of alchemical gold-making, illustrated by a Suzhou monk who wasted years of sincere religious effort chasing a fraud he refused to abandon.
或問:「燒煉之誆騙,莫不知之,而恆中之者,何也?」先聖有言:「智者不惑。」中丹客者,智不足也。雖然,世人不足責,出家僧亦有惑之者,為可歎也。夫世人以財為命,而丹砂可化為黃金,雖帝者亦惑於方士之說矣;故在俗家宜受其惑,而出家者不憶佛言乎?白毫相中八萬四千光明,以一分光明周給末法弟子尚不能盡,而奚事燒煉?蘇城一老僧,為興殿故,日誦《法華》七卷、佛號萬聲,祈丹事早成者,屢被誆騙,而不退悔。曰:「退悔則真仙不可致。」坐是宿志不回,初誠愈確,而卒無一成。夫為興佛殿故,雖屬好心,然此殿非一二萬金不可,望丹成以舉事,亦左矣!噫!以求丹之心求道;以養丹客之費,供事天下善知識;以鼎新佛殿之精誠,返照曠大劫來之天真佛;以七卷《法華》、萬聲佛號之勤苦回向西方,則不立一椽,建剎已竟。而乃用心於必不可成之役,盡敬於必不可信之人,惜哉!
Someone asked: "Everyone knows that alchemical gold-making is a swindle, and yet people are constantly taken in by it all the same — why is that?" The ancient sages once said: "The wise are never deceived." Those taken in by alchemists must simply lack sufficient wisdom. Even so, while ordinary people cannot really be blamed for such credulity, it is genuinely lamentable that monks too are sometimes deceived by it. Ordinary people treat wealth as their very life, and cinnabar's supposed transformation into gold has beguiled even emperors with the alchemists' claims — so it is understandable that laypeople fall under its spell, but how could a monk fail to remember the Buddha's own words? Among the Buddha's eighty-four thousand rays of light within his white brow-mark, a single portion of that light is more than enough to sustain his disciples throughout this Age of Dharma Decline in full — what need, then, for alchemical refining?
There was an old monk in Suzhou who, wishing to fund the restoration of a temple hall, recited the seven scrolls of the Lotus Sutra daily along with ten thousand recitations of the Buddha's name, praying for his alchemical project to succeed quickly. He was swindled again and again, yet never repented of the pursuit, saying: "If I give up now, the true immortal will never come to me." Holding fast to this resolve without ever turning back, his sincerity only grew firmer over time — and yet in the end he achieved nothing at all. His wish to restore the temple hall was, admittedly, a good intention, but such a hall could not be built for less than ten or twenty thousand taels of silver, and to wait for alchemical gold before beginning the work was itself badly misguided!
Ah — had he turned the very intensity with which he sought alchemical gold toward seeking the Way instead; had he spent what he gave to the alchemists in service of genuine spiritual teachers everywhere; had he turned the sincerity he poured into rebuilding a temple hall back upon his own innately pure, primordial Buddha-nature spanning countless past ages; had he dedicated the effort of his seven daily scrolls of the Lotus Sutra and his ten thousand recitations of the Buddha's name toward rebirth in the Western Pure Land — then, without erecting so much as a single rafter, the true building of the temple would already have been complete. Instead he poured his heart into a task that could never succeed, and his utmost reverence into men who could never be trusted. What a pity!
The white brow-mark (ūrṇā) and its eighty-four thousand rays of light are a standard element of the Buddha's thirty-two major marks in Mahāyāna iconography, and Zhuhong's citation of a single portion of that light sustaining the Buddha's disciples "throughout this Age of Dharma Decline" draws on the same doctrine of the Buddha's inexhaustible merit already invoked in this collection's discussion of material sufficiency in entry 45 above; the entry's closing reversal — that redirected sincerity would have "completed the temple" without a single rafter being raised — echoes the same rhetorical structure Zhuhong uses in entry 55, where devotion misapplied to an external goal is shown to already contain, unused, everything needed for genuine spiritual accomplishment.