竹窗隨筆・三筆 · Entries 105–106

Notes Beside the Bamboo Window — Third Collection, Part 30

Continuing the Third Collection (三筆). A two-part meditation on karmic retribution witnessed firsthand within a single lifetime: first a grim catalog of cruelty answered by swift misfortune, then a philosophical defense of why the Buddha does not simply make every cause and effect instantaneous and visible to all.

Translator: Ru-Yi Meditation Center Status: complete — all 398 entries translated Commentary guide: 華藏講記組's vernacular commentary (Huazang Study Group)

105. 現報(一)— Retribution Witnessed in This Very Life (Part One)

Zhuhong records, as a personal eyewitness rather than secondhand rumor, a grim catalog of cruelty and vanity answered within the same lifetime by swift and often gruesome misfortune — offered as a sober warning rather than idle gossip.

Chinese Source

報有三:一者今生作惡,現生受報。二者今生作惡,第二生受報。三者今生作惡,第二生未報,多生以後受報。惟善亦然。報之遲速,蓋各有緣因,但世人見惡者不報,或更昌隆,乃憤憤不平;未知三世之說故也。夫後之二報,人不及見,惟重現報。今姑記現報數事,目擊而非傳聞者。一人撾笞婢僕,動以百數。一日將一僕係頸東柱、係足西柱,使伸縮無路而痛責不休。其父大怒,遄往解放,而囑曰:「汝速去,渠若告汝逃亡,我即告渠忤逆。」遂得生還。後此人亦以己子賣與他家,而自身為鄉宦守門。又一人平生笞人如官府,後亦受官刑,斃囹圄中。一人中家內室也,妄費無算,後子女滅盡,老無依賴,為人縫補經絡。一人貴宦子也,驕奢佚遊侈費,不知慚愧,後追逐遊僧、丐者趁食於諸方。一人毀訾天神,無所顧忌,後為村民所毆,得疾身殞。一人辱詈如來及諸賢聖,皆人不忍聞者,俄而客死於外,不得歸。一人瞋母不悉委財帛,折其供事觀音大士一臂,後走馬湖塘,墮落折臂,幾死。又一人生七女七男,凡生一女,纔墮地,即溺殺之。其七男先後相繼亦死,男女十四人無一存者,惟老夫老婦相對哭泣而已。又數人出家者,我慢自賢,凡時人或有言論,一概呵以為非,乃復輕藐先哲,妄加毀訾,後俱不壽,或惡疾死;姑記之以警狂傲。

Ru-Yi Translation

Karmic retribution falls into three kinds: the first is committing wrong in this life and receiving retribution within this same life; the second is committing wrong in this life and receiving retribution in the next life; the third is committing wrong in this life, not receiving retribution in the next life either, but receiving it only after many further lives have passed. The same holds true for good deeds as well. The pace of retribution, whether fast or slow, has its own particular causes and conditions in each case — but when ordinary people see a wicked person go unpunished, or even prosper further still, they grow indignant and resentful, simply because they do not understand this teaching of retribution unfolding across three periods of time. The latter two kinds of retribution lie beyond what people can actually witness, so it is retribution within this very life that draws the most attention.

Let me set down here several cases of retribution witnessed within this same life — things I saw with my own eyes, not stories passed along secondhand. One man habitually beat his maidservants and manservants, often several hundred blows at a time. One day he bound a servant's neck to one pillar and his feet to another, leaving him no room to move at all, and beat him without pause. The servant's own father, learning of this, flew into a rage and rushed to free him, telling him: "Leave at once — if your master accuses you of running away, I will accuse him of gross impropriety first." The servant thus managed to escape with his life. Later, this same cruel master ended up selling his own son to another family, and was himself reduced to serving as a gatekeeper in some official's household.

Another man spent his whole life flogging people as though he himself held official authority to punish criminals; he later suffered official corporal punishment himself, and died in prison. Another was the wife of a moderately prosperous household who spent money recklessly without limit; she later lost every one of her children, and in her old age, with no one to depend on, supported herself by mending other people's clothes. Another was the son of a high official, arrogant, extravagant, and dissolute, squandering wealth without any sense of shame; he later ended up trailing after wandering monks and beggars, scavenging for food from place to place. Another man slandered the celestial gods without any restraint whatsoever, and was later beaten by villagers until he fell ill and died. Another man hurled abuse at the Buddha and the sages, uttering words too vile for anyone to bear hearing, and not long afterward died away from home, never to be buried in his native place. Another man, enraged that his own mother would not turn over all her wealth to him, broke off the arm of the statue of Guanyin that she had long worshipped — he later fell from his horse near a lake embankment and broke his own arm, nearly dying of it.

Another man fathered seven daughters and seven sons; each time a daughter was born, he drowned her the moment she touched the ground. His seven sons, one after another, also died in turn, so that of his fourteen children not a single one survived, leaving only the old man and his wife to weep facing one another. And there were several monks as well, arrogant and self-satisfied, who reflexively condemned as wrong whatever their contemporaries said, going so far as to belittle even the ancient sages with baseless slander — all of these men died young, or died of some terrible illness. I set these cases down here simply to serve as a warning to the arrogant and unrestrained.

Reading note — after the Huazang Study Group's commentary

Zhuhong's explicit insistence that these were cases he "witnessed with his own eyes, not stories passed along secondhand" marks a deliberate departure from the more literary or scriptural sourcing typical elsewhere in this collection, giving this entry the texture of a personal casebook rather than doctrinal argument; the same threefold scheme of retribution — within this life, in the next life, or only after many further lives — that opens this entry is also the framework Zhuhong applies to explain why the wicked sometimes appear to prosper, a concern already voiced in different form in this collection's discussion of King Yama's mixed fortune in entry 104 above.

106. 現報(二)— Retribution Witnessed in This Very Life (Part Two)

Asked why the Buddha, with all his miraculous power, does not simply make every cause bear its effect instantly and visibly, guaranteeing a virtuous world through fear alone, Zhuhong answers that karmic timing follows its own natural law that even a Buddha cannot override — and that genuine liberation, not fear, is the only real escape from the debt of past deeds.

Chinese Source

或問:「如來神力不可思議,何不使惡人皆現受惡報,而日兢兢焉不敢為惡也;善人皆現受善報,而日孳孳焉倍復為善也?則無為而天下太平矣!胡慮不及此?」嗟乎!報之有遲速,眾生業報自然如是,雖大聖不能轉速而令遲、扭遲而為速也。惟是叮嚀詔告以因果之不虛、酬償之難逭耳,聞而不信,亦末如之何也已矣!曰:「永嘉云:『了則業障本來空』,空則何因果酬償之有?」曰:「汝今了否?」曰:「未了也。」「未了應須償宿債。」

Ru-Yi Translation

Someone asked: "The Tathāgata's spiritual power is inconceivable — why does he not simply cause every wicked person to receive evil retribution immediately within this life, so that people would grow cautious and fearful each day and dare not do wrong; and cause every virtuous person to receive good retribution immediately as well, so that people would grow diligent each day and redouble their good deeds? The world would then achieve peace effortlessly! Why has this simply never occurred to him?"

Ah! Whether retribution comes quickly or slowly is simply how the karmic retribution of sentient beings naturally unfolds — even a great sage cannot compress what naturally takes a long time into something swift, nor stretch out what naturally comes quickly into something slow. All the sages and worthies can do is earnestly proclaim to the world that cause and effect are never false, and that repayment, once incurred, is exceedingly difficult to escape. If someone hears this teaching and still refuses to believe it, then truly nothing more can be done for him!

The questioner continued: "Yongjia said: 'Once one has fully realized this, karmic obstruction is originally empty.' If it is empty, then what karmic repayment could there possibly be?" I answered: "Have you yourself fully realized this?" He said: "Not yet." "Then, not yet having realized it, you must certainly still repay your own past debts."

Reading note — after the Huazang Study Group's commentary

The line "once one has fully realized this, karmic obstruction is originally empty" is drawn directly from the Song of Enlightenment (證道歌), traditionally attributed to the Tang Chan master Yongjia Xuanjue, whose very next line — omitted by Zhuhong's questioner but supplied by Zhuhong's own terse reply — completes the couplet: "not yet having realized it, one must still repay one's past debts." This entry's compact closing exchange is a good example of Zhuhong's characteristic method throughout this collection of countering a partial or selectively quoted classical line not with a lengthy rebuttal but by simply restoring the line's own missing second half, letting the original text answer the objection on its own.