The Kinds of Supernormal Power
This page carries Ru-Yi's translation of the Visuddhimagga's chapter 12, Iddhividhaniddesa ("The Discussion of the Kinds of Supernormal Power") — the opening chapter of the treatise's second part, and the first of two chapters treating the direct knowledges available to one who has mastered concentration. It works through all ten kinds of iddhi in the Paṭisambhidāmagga's classical list, devotes the bulk of its length to the power of resolve in full technical and narrative detail, and closes with the more compact powers of transformation and the mind-made body — before the treatise turns, in the next chapter, to the remaining five direct knowledges.
Translation Method
The Pāli source is the Chaṭṭha Saṅgāyana (Sixth Council) romanized edition maintained by the Vipassana Research Institute (VRI, tipitaka.org), cross-checked against the Pali Text Society's Rhys Davids edition (1920–21) as digitized on GRETIL. The VRI text is used under its stated terms — freely available for non-commercial use, with attribution to the Vipassana Research Institute — while the GRETIL/PTS digitization, which carries its own CC BY-SA licence, is used only to verify readings, never copied.
The English translation is Ru-Yi's own, made directly from the Pāli. No existing English translation of the Visuddhimagga — including Bhikkhu Ñāṇamoli's copyrighted The Path of Purification — is consulted, paraphrased, or used as a guide for wording or structure. Reading notes are grounded only in the text's own internal citations and in the general, uncontested conventions of the Pāli commentarial (aṭṭhakathā) genre — never in a modern scholar's specific interpretation. Each translated passage carries a short vocabulary list for readers learning Pāli alongside the text, continuing the same format established on this site's earlier Visuddhimagga chapters.
Five Mundane Direct Knowledges, and Fourteen Ways to Tame the Mind
Having completed the entire treatment of concentration proper, the treatise now turns to direct knowledge — the fruit that makes concentration's development worthwhile beyond its own immediate benefits, and the necessary foundation for the wisdom section still to come. The Buddha himself named five mundane direct knowledges reachable through the fourth jhāna: supernormal power, the divine ear, penetration of others' minds, recollection of past lives, and knowledge of beings' passing away and rebirth. Before any of these can be attempted, the meditator who has already reached the fourth jhāna in each of the eight kasiṇas must first tame his mind through fourteen distinct exercises — moving through the kasiṇas and jhānas forward, backward, and in combination — the same kind of rigorous preparatory drilling an apprentice undergoes before being trusted with delicate, high-stakes work.
Idāni yāsaṃ lokikābhiññānaṃ vasena ayaṃ samādhibhāvanā abhiññānisaṃsāti vuttā, tā abhiññā sampādetuṃ yasmā pathavīkasiṇādīsu adhigatacatutthajjhānena yoginā yogo kātabbo. Evañhissa sā samādhibhāvanā adhigatānisaṃsā ceva bhavissati thiratarā ca, so adhigatānisaṃsāya thiratarāya samādhibhāvanāya samannāgato sukheneva paññābhāvanaṃ sampādessati. Tasmā abhiññākathaṃ tāva ārabhissāma.
Bhagavatā hi adhigatacatutthajjhānasamādhīnaṃ kulaputtānaṃ samādhibhāvanānisaṃsadassanatthañceva uttaruttari paṇītapaṇītadhammadesanatthañca "so evaṃ samāhite citte parisuddhe pariyodāte anaṅgaṇe vigatūpakkilese mudubhūte kammaniye ṭhite āneñjappatte iddhividhāya cittaṃ abhinīharati abhininnāmeti. So anekavihitaṃ iddhividhaṃ paccanubhoti ekopi hutvā bahudhā hotī"tiādinā (dī. ni. 1.238) nayena iddhividhaṃ, dibbasotadhātuñāṇaṃ, cetopariyañāṇaṃ, pubbenivāsānussatiñāṇaṃ, sattānaṃ cutūpapāte ñāṇanti pañca lokikābhiññā vuttā.
Tattha ekopi hutvā bahudhā hotītiādikaṃ iddhivikubbanaṃ kātukāmena ādikammikena yoginā odātakasiṇapariyantesu aṭṭhasu kasiṇesu aṭṭha aṭṭha samāpattiyo nibbattetvā —
Kasiṇānulomato, kasiṇapaṭilomato, kasiṇānulomapaṭilomato, jhānānulomato, jhānapaṭilomato, jhānānulomapaṭilomato, jhānukkantikato, kasiṇukkantikato, jhānakasiṇukkantikato, aṅgasaṅkantito, ārammaṇasaṅkantito, aṅgārammaṇasaṅkantito, aṅgavavatthāpanato, ārammaṇavavatthāpanatoti.
Imehi cuddasahi ākārehi cittaṃ paridametabbaṃ.
Now, in order to accomplish those mundane direct knowledges by virtue of which this development of concentration was said to have the benefit of direct knowledge, the yogi who has already attained the fourth jhāna in the earth kasiṇa and the rest must apply himself to practice. For thus his development of concentration will both have its benefit actually attained and become more firmly established, and, endowed with such a development of concentration whose benefit has been attained and which has become more firmly established, he will accomplish the development of wisdom with ease. Therefore we shall now begin the discussion of direct knowledge.
For the Blessed One, both in order to show the benefit of the development of concentration to those sons of good family who had attained the concentration of the fourth jhāna, and in order to teach an ever more sublime and refined Dhamma, spoke of the five mundane direct knowledges by the method beginning, "with mind thus concentrated, purified, bright, without blemish, free from defilement, grown soft and workable, steady, and attained to imperturbability, he directs and inclines his mind toward the various kinds of supernormal power. He experiences the various kinds of supernormal power: having been one, he becomes many" (D.N. 1.238) — namely, supernormal power, the knowledge of the element of the divine ear, the knowledge of penetrating others' minds, the knowledge of recollecting past lives, and the knowledge of the passing away and rebirth of beings.
Herein, a beginning yogi wishing to perform the transformation of supernormal power beginning with "having been one, he becomes many" should, having produced the eight attainments in each of the eight kasiṇas ending with the white kasiṇa, then proceed —
by way of the kasiṇas in forward order, by way of the kasiṇas in reverse order, by way of the kasiṇas in forward and reverse order; by way of the jhānas in forward order, by way of the jhānas in reverse order, by way of the jhānas in forward and reverse order; by way of skipping jhānas, by way of skipping kasiṇas, by way of skipping both jhānas and kasiṇas; by way of transposing factors, by way of transposing objects, by way of transposing both factors and objects; by way of defining factors, and by way of defining objects.
By these fourteen methods the mind should be tamed.
The requirement that a meditator have already mastered the fourth jhāna in all eight kasiṇas — not merely one — before attempting any of these fourteen exercises is a significant escalation beyond anything demanded so far in this treatise. Every earlier chapter treated the kasiṇas somewhat independently, as alternative doors to the same basic attainment; here, for the first time, genuine mastery is defined as fluency across all eight simultaneously, since the fourteen taming exercises depend on being able to move freely between them.
The fourteen categories themselves are best understood as three families of drill rather than fourteen unrelated techniques: moving through the kasiṇas alone, moving through the jhānas alone, and moving through both together — each family then further varied by direction (forward, reverse, both) and by whether progress is continuous or deliberately skips steps. The goal in every case is the same: a mind so flexible it can shift its concentrated state on command, in any direction, without hesitation.
direct knowledge, supernormal knowledge — abhi- (toward, intensively) + jñā (to know); the five mundane attainments this chapter and the next treat, all reached by refining the fourth jhāna already mastered in the concentration section.
to tame, to fully train — pari- (thoroughly) + dam- (to tame, subdue); the verb describing what the fourteen exercises accomplish, treating the concentrated mind as something requiring active, disciplined conditioning before it can perform supernormal feats.
skipping, moving by intervals — describing three of the fourteen methods in which the meditator deliberately jumps over intervening jhānas or kasiṇas rather than progressing through every one in sequence, a harder variant of the basic forward/reverse drill.
The Fourteen Exercises Defined, One by One
Each of the fourteen naming categories from the previous section is now defined precisely. Moving through the eight kasiṇas from earth to white in strict sequence is "forward"; reversing that order is "backward"; alternating between the two is "forward-and-backward." The same three variations apply to the four jhānas and the four immaterial attainments taken together as a single eight-step ladder. "Skipping" methods deliberately jump over an intervening jhāna or kasiṇa rather than passing through it. "Transposing" methods hold either the jhāna or the object fixed while varying the other, or vary both together. And the two "defining" methods simply catalogue, without any actual re-attainment, how many factors each jhāna has, or which kasiṇa is which.
Katamaṃ panettha kasiṇānulomaṃ…pe… katamaṃ ārammaṇavavatthāpananti. Idha bhikkhu pathavīkasiṇe jhānaṃ samāpajjati, tato āpokasiṇeti evaṃ paṭipāṭiyā aṭṭhasu kasiṇesu satakkhattumpi sahassakkhattumpi samāpajjati, idaṃ kasiṇānulomaṃ nāma.
Odātakasiṇato pana paṭṭhāya tatheva paṭilomakkamena samāpajjanaṃ kasiṇapaṭilomaṃ nāma.
Pathavīkasiṇato paṭṭhāya yāva odātakasiṇaṃ, odātakasiṇatopi paṭṭhāya yāva pathavīkasiṇanti evaṃ anulomapaṭilomavasena punappunaṃ samāpajjanaṃ kasiṇānulomapaṭilomaṃ nāma.
Paṭhamajjhānato pana paṭṭhāya paṭipāṭiyā yāva nevasaññānāsaññāyatanaṃ, tāva punappunaṃ samāpajjanaṃ jhānānulomaṃ nāma.
Nevasaññānāsaññāyatanato paṭṭhāya yāva paṭhamajjhānaṃ, tāva punappunaṃ samāpajjanaṃ jhānapaṭilomaṃ nāma.
Paṭhamajjhānato paṭṭhāya yāva nevasaññānāsaññāyatanaṃ, nevasaññānāsaññāyatanato paṭṭhāya yāva paṭhamajjhānanti evaṃ anulomapaṭilomavasena punappunaṃ samāpajjanaṃ jhānānulomapaṭilomaṃ nāma.
Pathavīkasiṇe pana paṭhamaṃ jhānaṃ samāpajjitvā tattheva tatiyaṃ samāpajjati, tato tadeva ugghāṭetvā ākāsānañcāyatanaṃ, tato ākiñcaññāyatananti evaṃ kasiṇaṃ anukkamitvā jhānasseva ekantarikabhāvena ukkamanaṃ jhānukkantikaṃ nāma. Evaṃ āpokasiṇādimūlikāpi yojanā kātabbā.
Pathavīkasiṇe paṭhamaṃ jhānaṃ samāpajjitvā puna tadeva tejokasiṇe, tato nīlakasiṇe, tato lohitakasiṇeti iminā nayena jhānaṃ anukkamitvā kasiṇasseva ekantarikabhāvena ukkamanaṃ kasiṇukkantikaṃ nāma.
Pathavīkasiṇe paṭhamaṃ jhānaṃ samāpajjitvā tato tejokasiṇe tatiyaṃ, nīlakasiṇaṃ ugghāṭetvā ākāsānañcāyatanaṃ, lohitakasiṇato ākiñcaññāyatananti iminā nayena jhānassa ceva kasiṇassa ca ukkamanaṃ jhānakasiṇukkantikaṃ nāma.
Pathavīkasiṇe pana paṭhamaṃ jhānaṃ samāpajjitvā tattheva itaresampi samāpajjanaṃ aṅgasaṅkantikaṃ nāma.
Pathavīkasiṇe paṭhamaṃ jhānaṃ samāpajjitvā tadeva āpokasiṇe…pe… tadeva odātakasiṇeti evaṃ sabbakasiṇesu ekasseva jhānassa samāpajjanaṃ ārammaṇasaṅkantikaṃ nāma.
Pathavīkasiṇe paṭhamaṃ jhānaṃ samāpajjitvā āpokasiṇe dutiyaṃ, tejokasiṇe tatiyaṃ, vāyokasiṇe catutthaṃ, nīlakasiṇaṃ ugghāṭetvā ākāsānañcāyatanaṃ, pītakasiṇato viññāṇañcāyatanaṃ, lohitakasiṇato ākiñcaññāyatanaṃ, odātakasiṇato nevasaññānāsaññāyatananti evaṃ ekantarikavasena aṅgānañca ārammaṇānañca saṅkamanaṃ aṅgārammaṇasaṅkantikaṃ nāma.
Paṭhamaṃ jhānaṃ pana pañcaṅgikanti vavatthapetvā dutiyaṃ tivaṅgikaṃ, tatiyaṃ duvaṅgikaṃ, tathā catutthaṃ ākāsānañcāyatanaṃ…pe… nevasaññānāsaññāyatananti evaṃ jhānaṅgamattasseva vavatthāpanaṃ aṅgavavatthāpanaṃ nāma.
Tathā idaṃ pathavīkasiṇanti vavatthapetvā idaṃ āpokasiṇaṃ…pe… idaṃ odātakasiṇanti evaṃ ārammaṇamattasseva vavatthāpanaṃ ārammaṇavavatthāpanaṃ nāma. Aṅgārammaṇavavatthāpanampi eke icchanti. Aṭṭhakathāsu pana anāgatattā addhā taṃ bhāvanāmukhaṃ na hoti.
Herein, what is "the kasiṇas in forward order," and so on up to what is "defining objects"? Here, a monk attains jhāna in the earth kasiṇa, then in the water kasiṇa, and so on, attaining in the eight kasiṇas in this order a hundred times or even a thousand times — this is called "the kasiṇas in forward order."
Attaining in that same order, but starting from the white kasiṇa and proceeding in reverse, is called "the kasiṇas in reverse order."
Attaining again and again, from the earth kasiṇa up to the white kasiṇa, and then from the white kasiṇa back down to the earth kasiṇa, by way of forward and reverse order, is called "the kasiṇas in forward and reverse order."
Attaining again and again, in order, from the first jhāna up to the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, is called "the jhānas in forward order."
Attaining again and again, from the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception back down to the first jhāna, is called "the jhānas in reverse order."
Attaining again and again, from the first jhāna up to the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, and then from the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception back down to the first jhāna, by way of forward and reverse order, is called "the jhānas in forward and reverse order."
Having attained the first jhāna in the earth kasiṇa, then attaining the third jhāna in that same kasiṇa, then, having removed that very kasiṇa, the base of infinite space, then the base of nothingness — thus skipping over the kasiṇa while advancing the jhāna by alternating steps, is called "skipping jhānas." The same application should be made starting from the water kasiṇa and the rest.
Having attained the first jhāna in the earth kasiṇa, then that same first jhāna in the fire kasiṇa, then in the blue kasiṇa, then in the red kasiṇa — thus, by this method, skipping over the jhāna while advancing the kasiṇa by alternating steps, is called "skipping kasiṇas."
Having attained the first jhāna in the earth kasiṇa, then the third jhāna in the fire kasiṇa, then, having removed the blue kasiṇa, the base of infinite space, then, from the red kasiṇa, the base of nothingness — by this method, skipping over both the jhāna and the kasiṇa, is called "skipping both jhānas and kasiṇas."
Having attained the first jhāna in the earth kasiṇa, then attaining the other jhānas in that very same kasiṇa, is called "transposing factors."
Having attained the first jhāna in the earth kasiṇa, then that very same first jhāna in the water kasiṇa, and so on, that very same first jhāna in the white kasiṇa — thus attaining one and the same jhāna across all the kasiṇas, is called "transposing objects."
Having attained the first jhāna in the earth kasiṇa, the second in the water kasiṇa, the third in the fire kasiṇa, the fourth in the wind kasiṇa, then, having removed the blue kasiṇa, the base of infinite space; from the yellow kasiṇa, the base of infinite consciousness; from the red kasiṇa, the base of nothingness; from the white kasiṇa, the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception — thus transposing both the factors and the objects by alternating steps, is called "transposing both factors and objects."
Having determined that the first jhāna has five factors, the second three factors, and the third two factors, and likewise that the fourth jhāna, the base of infinite space, and so on up to the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception each have their own number of factors — this mere determination of the jhāna-factors is called "defining factors."
Likewise, having determined, "this is the earth kasiṇa," "this is the water kasiṇa," and so on, "this is the white kasiṇa" — this mere determination of the objects is called "defining objects." Some also wish to include "defining both factors and objects," but since this does not occur in the commentaries, it is certainly not an actual approach to development.
The distinction between "skipping jhānas" and "skipping kasiṇas" is a fine but important one: in the first, the meditator stays with a single kasiṇa but leaps across jhāna levels (first, then third, then straight into the formless attainments); in the second, the meditator stays within a single jhāna level but leaps across different kasiṇa objects. Only the third variant, skipping both together, actually combines the two kinds of leap at once — a genuinely demanding test of a mind's flexibility.
The closing note about "defining both factors and objects" is a small but telling piece of scholarly restraint: even though some unnamed teachers apparently wanted to round the list out to a symmetrical fifteen, the commentarial tradition itself never records this combined method as an actual practice, and the text declines to invent one merely for the sake of completeness — a reminder that this treatise generally prefers attested practice over theoretical tidiness.
forward order / reverse order — anu- (following) + loma (hair, i.e. "with the grain") versus paṭi- (against) + loma ("against the grain"); the basic directional pair applied to both the kasiṇa sequence and the jhāna sequence throughout this section.
transposing, transferring — saṃ- (together) + kram- (to step, to go); describing the exercises that hold one variable (a jhāna factor or a kasiṇa object) fixed while systematically varying the other.
defining, determining — the two purely analytical exercises (of factors, and of objects) that require no actual re-entry into any attainment, simply a clear mental cataloguing of what has already been mastered.
One in a Hundred Thousand: How Rare Real Mastery Actually Is
The chapter pauses to state, with unusual bluntness, exactly how difficult this whole path actually is: at every single stage — the kasiṇa's preliminary work, producing its sign, developing that sign to absorption, taming the mind by the fourteen methods, performing the transformation itself, and finally becoming quick enough at it to be reliable — only one meditator in a hundred, or a thousand, succeeds. Two stories illustrate the stakes of that final, rarest quality, quick-wittedness: thirty thousand monks, shamed into urgency by watching a single eight-year monk single-handedly protect their ailing teacher from a threatening nāga, and an elder who conjured solid ground in mid-air to shield a crowd from a rain of burning embers sent by Māra himself. The section closes with an important exception: Buddhas, Paccekabuddhas, and chief disciples need none of this graduated training at all, since their supernormal powers arise automatically the moment they attain arahantship — the long apprenticeship described here is for everyone else.
Imehi pana cuddasahi ākārehi cittaṃ aparidametvā pubbe abhāvitabhāvano ādikammiko yogāvacaro iddhivikubbanaṃ sampādessatīti netaṃ ṭhānaṃ vijjati. Ādikammikassa hi kasiṇaparikammampi bhāro, satesu sahassesu vā ekova sakkoti. Katakasiṇaparikammassa nimittuppādanaṃ bhāro, satesu sahassesu vā ekova sakkoti. Uppanne nimitte taṃ vaḍḍhetvā appanādhigamo bhāro, satesu sahassesu vā ekova sakkoti. Adhigatappanassa cuddasahākārehi cittaparidamanaṃ bhāro, satesu sahassesu vā ekova sakkoti. Cuddasahākārehi paridamitacittassāpi iddhivikubbanaṃ nāma bhāro, satesu sahassesu vā ekova sakkoti. Vikubbanappattassāpi khippanisantibhāvo nāma bhāro, satesu sahassesu vā ekova khippanisantī hoti. Therambatthale mahārohaṇaguttattherassa gilānupaṭṭhānaṃ āgatesu tiṃsamattesu iddhimantasahassesu upasampadāya aṭṭhavassiko rakkhitatthero viya. Tassānubhāvo pathavīkasiṇaniddese (visuddhi. 1.78 ādayo) vuttoyeva. Taṃ panassānubhāvaṃ disvā thero āha "āvuso, sace rakkhito nābhavissa sabbe garahappattā assāma 'nāgarājānaṃ rakkhituṃ nāsakkhiṃsū'ti. Tasmā attanā gahetvā vicaritabbaṃ āvudhaṃ nāma malaṃ sodhetvāva gahetvā vicarituṃ vaṭṭatī"ti. Te therassa ovāde ṭhatvā tiṃsasahassāpi bhikkhū khippanisantino ahesuṃ.
Khippanisantiyāpi ca sati parassa patiṭṭhābhāvo bhāro, satesu sahassesu vā ekova hoti, giribhaṇḍavāhanapūjāya mārena aṅgāravasse pavattite ākāse pathaviṃ māpetvā aṅgāravassaparittārako thero viya.
Balavapubbayogānaṃ pana buddhapaccekabuddhaaggasāvakādīnaṃ vināpi iminā vuttappakārena bhāvanānukkamena arahattapaṭilābheneva idañca iddhivikubbanaṃ aññe ca paṭisambhidādibhedā guṇā ijjhanti. Tasmā yathā piḷandhanavikatiṃ kattukāmo suvaṇṇakāro aggidhamanādīhi suvaṇṇaṃ muduṃ kammaññaṃ katvāva karoti, yathā ca bhājanavikatiṃ kattukāmo kumbhakāro mattikaṃ suparimadditaṃ muduṃ katvā karoti, evameva ādikammikena imehi cuddasahākārehi cittaṃ paridametvā chandasīsacittasīsavīriyasīsavīmaṃsāsīsasamāpajjanavasena ceva āvajjanādivasībhāvavasena ca muduṃ kammaññaṃ katvā iddhividhāya yogo karaṇīyo. Pubbahetusampannena pana kasiṇesu catutthajjhānamatte ciṇṇavasināpi kātuṃ vaṭṭati. Yathā panettha yogo kātabbo, taṃ vidhiṃ dassento bhagavā "so evaṃ samāhite citte"tiādimāha.
But there is simply no possibility whatsoever that a beginning meditator, whose development is not yet complete, could accomplish the transformation of supernormal power without first having tamed his mind by these fourteen methods. For the beginner, even the preliminary work on the kasiṇa is a burden — only one in a hundred, or in a thousand, is capable of it. For one who has done the preliminary work on the kasiṇa, producing the sign is a burden — only one in a hundred, or in a thousand, is capable of it. For one in whom the sign has arisen, developing it and reaching absorption is a burden — only one in a hundred, or in a thousand, is capable of it. For one who has reached absorption, taming the mind by the fourteen methods is a burden — only one in a hundred, or in a thousand, is capable of it. And for one whose mind has been tamed by the fourteen methods, this transformation of supernormal power is itself a burden — only one in a hundred, or in a thousand, is capable of it. And even for one who has reached that transformation, being quick-witted at it is itself a burden — only one in a hundred, or in a thousand, becomes quick-witted. It was just so with Elder Rakkhita, only eight years since his higher ordination, at Therambatthala, when about thirty thousand monks possessed of supernormal power had come to tend the ailing Elder Mahārohaṇagutta. His power has already been told in the exposition of the earth kasiṇa (Vism. 1.78 and following). Having seen that power of his, the elder said: "Friends, had Rakkhita not been present, we would all have deserved blame, people saying, 'they were unable to protect the nāga-king.' Therefore, a weapon one carries and wields oneself should only be carried and wielded after its rust has first been cleaned away." Standing by the elder's admonition, all thirty thousand monks became quick-witted.
And even when quick-wittedness is present, being a support for others is itself a burden — only one in a hundred, or in a thousand, is capable of it — as with the elder who, when Māra caused a rain of embers to fall during the Giribhaṇḍavāhana festival, conjured earth in the sky and thereby protected the people from that rain of embers.
But for those of powerful prior practice — Buddhas, Paccekabuddhas, chief disciples, and the like — this transformation of supernormal power, and other distinct qualities such as the discriminating knowledges, are accomplished by the mere attainment of arahantship alone, without this stated sequence of development at all. Therefore, just as a goldsmith wishing to make an ornament first makes the gold soft and workable by blowing on the fire and the like, and just as a potter wishing to make a vessel first makes the clay soft by thoroughly kneading it — just so, a beginner should first tame his mind by these fourteen methods, and make it soft and workable by way of entering jhāna with desire, mind, energy, or investigation as the predominant factor, and by way of mastery in adverting and the rest, before carrying out the practice for supernormal power. But one endowed with sufficient prior cause may do so merely with mastery of the fourth jhāna alone in the kasiṇas. And to show the manner in which this practice should be carried out, the Blessed One spoke thus, beginning, "with mind thus concentrated..."
The cascading "one in a hundred, or in a thousand" refrain, repeated six times in strict succession, is a deliberately sobering piece of rhetoric: even granting the most generous reading — one in a hundred at each stage — the compounded probability of clearing all six hurdles in succession is vanishingly small, and the text clearly intends the reader to register just how exceptional a fully accomplished master of supernormal power actually is, rather than treating these powers as a routine reward for ordinary diligence.
The goldsmith and potter similes, closing the section, make a specific point about sequencing rather than difficulty: neither craftsman can shape valuable material until it has first been made soft and workable, and the fourteen taming exercises play exactly this preparatory role for the mind — not the supernormal feat itself, but the necessary conditioning that makes the mind receptive to being shaped into it at all.
quick-wittedness, rapid mastery — khippa (quick) + nisanti (understanding, catching on); the rarest of the six qualities named in this section, describing not just the ability to perform a feat but the agility to perform it reliably, on demand, without hesitation.
powerful prior practice — bala (strength) + pubba (prior, former) + yoga (practice, effort); the accumulated merit of Buddhas, Paccekabuddhas, and chief disciples across countless past lives, which exempts them from this chapter's entire graduated training sequence.
with desire / energy / mind / investigation as the head (predominant factor) — four alternative ways of entering jhāna, each led by a different one of the four bases of supernormal power that the next several sections will treat in detail.
Eight Qualities of a Mind Fit for Direct Knowledge
The chapter now glosses, word by word and then by a second complete method, the canonical formula describing the exact quality of mind needed before any direct knowledge can be realized. Purified, bright, without blemish, free from defilement, grown soft, workable, steady, and attained to imperturbability — eight terms are shown to build on one another in careful sequence, purity yielding brightness, blemish-freedom yielding freedom from defilement, softness yielding workability like well-refined gold, and a final steadiness so complete it is guarded on six fronts at once — by faith against faithlessness, by energy against laziness, by mindfulness against negligence, by concentration against restlessness, by wisdom against ignorance, and by its own luminosity against the darkness of the defilements.
Tatrāyaṃ pāḷinayānusāreneva vinicchayakathā. Tattha soti so adhigatacatutthajjhāno yogī. Evanti catutthajjhānakkamanidassanametaṃ. Iminā paṭhamajjhānādhigamādinā kamena catutthajjhānaṃ paṭilabhitvāti vuttaṃ hoti. Samāhiteti iminā catutthajjhānasamādhinā samāhite. Citteti rūpāvacaracitte. Parisuddhetiādīsu pana upekkhāsatipārisuddhibhāvena parisuddhe. Parisuddhattāyeva pariyodāte, pabhassareti vuttaṃ hoti. Sukhādīnaṃ paccayānaṃ ghātena vihatarāgādiaṅgaṇattā anaṅgaṇe. Anaṅgaṇattāyeva vigatūpakkilese. Aṅgaṇena hi taṃ cittaṃ upakkilissati. Subhāvitattā mudubhūte, vasībhāvappatteti vuttaṃ hoti. Vase vattamānaṃ hi cittaṃ mudunti vuccati. Muduttāyeva ca kammaniye, kammakkhame kammayoggeti vuttaṃ hoti. Muduṃ hi cittaṃ kammaniyaṃ hoti sudantamiva suvaṇṇaṃ, tañca ubhayampi subhāvitattāyevāti. Yathāha "nāhaṃ, bhikkhave, aññaṃ ekadhammampi samanupassāmi, yaṃ evaṃ bhāvitaṃ bahulīkataṃ muduñca hoti kammaniyañca, yathayidaṃ, bhikkhave, citta"nti (a. ni. 1.22).
Etesu parisuddhabhāvādīsu ṭhitattā ṭhite. Ṭhitattāyeva āneñjappatte, acale niriñjaneti vuttaṃ hoti. Mudukammaññabhāvena vā attano vase ṭhitattā ṭhite. Saddhādīhi pariggahitattā āneñjappatte. Saddhāpariggahitaṃ hi cittaṃ assaddhiyena na iñjati. Vīriyapariggahitaṃ kosajjena na iñjati. Satipariggahitaṃ pamādena na iñjati. Samādhipariggahitaṃ uddhaccena na iñjati. Paññāpariggahitaṃ avijjāya na iñjati. Obhāsagataṃ kilesandhakārena na iñjati. Imehi chahi dhammehi pariggahitaṃ āneñjappattaṃ hoti. Evaṃ aṭṭhaṅgasamannāgataṃ cittaṃ abhinīhārakkhamaṃ hoti abhiññāsacchikaraṇīyānaṃ dhammānaṃ abhiññāsacchikiriyāya.
Aparo nayo, catutthajjhānasamādhinā samāhite. Nīvaraṇadūrabhāvena parisuddhe. Vitakkādisamatikkamena pariyodāte. Jhānapaṭilābhapaccayānaṃ icchāvacarānaṃ abhāvena anaṅgaṇe. Abhijjhādīnaṃ cittassa upakkilesānaṃ vigamena vigatūpakkilese. Ubhayampi cetaṃ anaṅgaṇasuttavatthasuttānusārena (ma. ni. 1.57 ādayo) veditabbaṃ. Vasippattiyā mudubhūte. Iddhipādabhāvūpagamena kammaniye. Bhāvanāpāripūriyā paṇītabhāvūpagamena ṭhite āneñjappatte. Yathā āneñjappattaṃ hoti, evaṃ ṭhiteti attho. Evampi aṭṭhaṅgasamannāgataṃ cittaṃ abhinīhārakkhamaṃ hoti abhiññāsacchikaraṇīyānaṃ dhammānaṃ abhiññāsacchikiriyāya pādakaṃ padaṭṭhānabhūtanti.
Here is the explanatory discussion, following the canonical wording itself. Herein, "he" is that yogi who has attained the fourth jhāna. "Thus" points to the sequence leading to the fourth jhāna — the meaning is, having attained the fourth jhāna by this sequence beginning with the attainment of the first jhāna. "Concentrated" means concentrated by this concentration of the fourth jhāna. "Mind" means fine-material-sphere consciousness. As for "purified" and the rest: it is purified by the purity of equanimity and mindfulness. Precisely because it is purified, it is "bright" — the meaning is, radiant. Because, through the destruction of the conditions for pleasure and the rest, it is free of the blemish of lust and the rest, it is "without blemish." Precisely because it is without blemish, it is "free from defilement" — for it is by blemish that a mind becomes defiled. Because it has been well developed, it is "grown soft" — the meaning is, having attained mastery, for a mind that operates under its own control is called "soft." And precisely because it is soft, it is "workable" — the meaning is, capable of work, fit for work. For a soft mind is workable, like well-refined gold, and both of these qualities come about precisely through good development. As it was said: "Monks, I do not see even a single other thing that, when thus developed and made much of, becomes as soft and as workable as the mind" (A.N. 1.22).
Because it is established in these states of purity and the rest, it is "steady." Precisely because it is steady, it is "attained to imperturbability" — the meaning is, immovable, unshaken. Or: because it is steady by way of a soft, workable state under its own control, it is "steady." Because it is grasped and protected by faith and the rest, it is "attained to imperturbability." For a mind grasped by faith is not shaken by lack of faith. One grasped by energy is not shaken by laziness. One grasped by mindfulness is not shaken by negligence. One grasped by concentration is not shaken by restlessness. One grasped by wisdom is not shaken by ignorance. One that has gone to luminosity is not shaken by the darkness of the defilements. Grasped by these six qualities, it becomes "attained to imperturbability." Thus, a mind endowed with these eight factors is capable of being directed toward the direct realization, through direct knowledge, of those things that are to be realized through direct knowledge.
Here is another method: "concentrated" by the concentration of the fourth jhāna. "Purified" by being far removed from the hindrances. "Bright" by having transcended applied thought and the rest. "Without blemish" by the absence of the desire-based occasions that are conditions for the attainment of jhāna. "Free from defilement" by the removal of the mind's defilements such as covetousness and the rest. Both of these should be understood in accordance with the Anaṅgaṇa Sutta and the Vatthūpama Sutta (M.N. 1.57 and following). "Grown soft" by the attainment of mastery. "Workable" by arriving at the state of a basis for supernormal power. "Steady" and "attained to imperturbability" by arriving at a sublime state through the fulfillment of development — the meaning is, it is "steady" in such a way that it becomes "attained to imperturbability." Thus too, a mind endowed with these eight factors is capable of being directed toward the direct realization, through direct knowledge, of those things to be realized through direct knowledge, becoming the basis, the proximate cause, for that realization.
The two explanations offered here are not competing interpretations but complementary lenses on the same eight terms: the first reads them as a chain of mutual causation (purity causing brightness, blemish-freedom causing freedom from defilement, softness causing workability), while the second maps each term directly onto specific technical categories already established elsewhere in the canon (the hindrances, applied thought, the desire-based occasions named in the Anaṅgaṇa Sutta) — offering the same eight-fold structure once as an internal psychological process and once as a checklist against named obstacles.
The sixfold guarding of "imperturbability" — faith against faithlessness, energy against laziness, mindfulness against negligence, concentration against restlessness, wisdom against ignorance, and luminosity against the darkness of defilement — quietly reintroduces the five spiritual faculties (saddhā, vīriya, sati, samādhi, paññā) from far earlier in the Buddhist path, showing that even this specialized, advanced preparation for supernormal power ultimately rests on exactly the same basic qualities cultivated from the very beginning of practice.
attained to imperturbability — a- (not) + iñjati (to shake, waver) + patta (attained); the final and most fortified of the eight qualities, described here as guarded on six separate fronts against six specific corrupting states.
a blemish, a stain — the specific defect (identified elsewhere with lust and its kin) whose absence is what makes a purified mind additionally "without blemish," distinguishing this quality from mere purity itself.
the state of being a basis for supernormal power — iddhipāda (a basis for supernormal power, one of four such bases treated in the sections just ahead) + bhāva (state); the specific quality the second explanation attributes to a "workable" mind.
What "Power" Means, and Ten Kinds of It
The second and much longer part of the chapter turns from the mind's preparation to the ten kinds of "power" (iddhi) itself, opening with a careful etymological survey of the word's range of meaning: succeeding in the sense of accomplishment and attainment (as when a desire "succeeds" for one who pursues it), succeeding as the fruit of a properly accomplished means (as when a virtuous person's sincere resolve bears fruit precisely because of its own purity), and succeeding as the specific quality by which beings "become powerful, prosperous, arrived at excellence." This last sense yields the canonical list of ten distinct kinds of power the rest of the chapter will work through one by one: resolve, transformation, the mind-made body, the pervasive influence of knowledge, the pervasive influence of concentration, the power of the noble ones, kamma-born power, the power of merit, power consisting in magical knowledge, and simple success through proper application.
Iddhividhāya cittaṃ abhinīharati abhininnāmetīti ettha ijjhanaṭṭhena iddhi, nipphattiatthena paṭilābhaṭṭhena cāti vuttaṃ hoti. Yañhi nipphajjati paṭilabbhati ca, taṃ ijjhatīti vuccati. Yathāha "kāmaṃ kāmayamānassa, tassa cetaṃ samijjhatī"ti (su. ni. 772). Tathā "nekkhammaṃ ijjhatīti iddhi, paṭiharatīti pāṭihāriyaṃ. Arahattamaggo ijjhatīti iddhi, paṭiharatīti pāṭihāriya"nti (paṭi. ma. 3.32).
Aparo nayo, ijjhanaṭṭhena iddhi. Upāyasampadāyetamadhivacanaṃ. Upāyasampadā hi ijjhati adhippetaphalappasavanato. Yathāha – "ayaṃ kho citto gahapati sīlavā kalyāṇadhammo, sace paṇidahissati 'anāgatamaddhānaṃ rājā assaṃ cakkavattī'ti, tassa kho ayaṃ ijjhissati sīlavato cetopaṇidhi visuddhattā"ti (saṃ. ni. 4.352).
Aparo nayo, etāya sattā ijjhantīti iddhi. Ijjhantīti iddhā vuddhā ukkaṃsagatā hontīti vuttaṃ hoti. Sā dasavidhā. Yathāha "kati iddhiyoti dasa iddhiyo". Puna caparaṃ āha "katamā dasa iddhiyo? Adhiṭṭhānā iddhi, vikubbanā iddhi, manomayā iddhi, ñāṇavipphārā iddhi, samādhivipphārā iddhi, ariyā iddhi, kammavipākajā iddhi, puññavato iddhi, vijjāmayā iddhi, tattha tattha sammāpayogapaccayā ijjhanaṭṭhena iddhī"ti (paṭi. ma. 3.9).
"He directs and inclines his mind toward the various kinds of supernormal power": herein, "power" is so called in the sense of succeeding, that is, in the sense of accomplishment and of attainment. For whatever is accomplished and attained is said to "succeed." As it is said: "for one desiring sense pleasures, that desire indeed succeeds for him" (Sn. 772). Likewise: "renunciation succeeds, therefore it is 'power'; it counters opposing states, therefore it is a 'marvel.' The path to arahantship succeeds, therefore it is 'power'; it counters opposing states, therefore it is a 'marvel'" (Paṭis. iii.32).
Here is another method: "power," in the sense of succeeding, is a designation for the accomplishment of the proper means. For the accomplishment of the means "succeeds," since it produces the intended result. As it is said: "This householder Citta is virtuous, of good character; should he resolve, 'may I become a wheel-turning monarch in a future time,' this resolve of his, virtuous as he is, will indeed succeed, owing to its purity" (S.N. 4.352).
Here is another method: "power" is so called because, by means of it, beings "succeed." "They succeed" means: they become powerful, prosperous, arrived at excellence. It is tenfold. As it is said: "how many kinds of power are there? — there are ten kinds of power." And again it is said: "what are the ten kinds of power? The power consisting in resolve, the power consisting in transformation, the power consisting in the mind-made body, the power arising from the pervasive influence of knowledge, the power arising from the pervasive influence of concentration, the power of the noble ones, the power born of the result of kamma, the power of one possessed of merit, the power consisting in magical knowledge, and the power that succeeds, in the sense of succeeding, through proper application in this or that particular matter" (Paṭis. iii.9).
The three-fold etymological survey establishes something important before any of the ten specific powers is even named: "iddhi" is not, at its root, a magical or occult term at all, but the ordinary word for something simply working, succeeding, or bearing fruit — the same word used of an ordinary person's sincere wish coming true. The word's later, more exotic sense (flying, walking through walls, and so on) is only one particular application of this much broader, thoroughly mundane meaning of successful accomplishment.
The ten-item list is deliberately heterogeneous in a way worth flagging early: it ranges from an ascetic's deliberately cultivated meditative attainments (resolve, transformation) to a bird's ordinary capacity for flight (kamma-born power) to a wheel-turning monarch's wealth (the power of merit) — a genuine reminder that this treatise's ten "powers" span everything from rigorous jhāna-based cultivation to the simple, unremarkable consequences of having been born with a particular kind of body or accumulated a particular kind of merit.
to succeed, to be accomplished — the verbal root underlying "iddhi" itself, used across ordinary contexts (a wish coming true, a plan bearing fruit) as well as the specialized sense of supernormal power this chapter examines.
a marvel, a wonder — paṭi- (against) + hṛ- (to carry, remove); glossed here as "that which counters" opposing states, a companion term to iddhi applied to both meditative attainments (renunciation) and the path to arahantship itself.
the accomplishment of the proper means — upāya (a means, method) + sampadā (accomplishment, success); the specific sense of "power" illustrated by the householder Citta's story, where sincere and pure resolve is itself sufficient cause for the intended result.
Resolve, Transformation, and the Mind-Made Body
The first three of the ten powers, all directly cultivated through meditation, are defined in quick succession: the power of resolve, by which one adverts to being a hundred, a thousand, or a hundred thousand and then simply determines it so by knowledge; the power of transformation, by which one abandons one's natural appearance and displays instead the form of a boy, a nāga, or even an entire army in battle array; and the power of the mind-made body, by which a second body, complete with form, is created from within the meditator's own physical body. These three will occupy the bulk of the chapter's remaining technical discussion once the other seven, more varied kinds of power have been surveyed.
Tattha "pakatiyā eko bahukaṃ āvajjati. Sataṃ vā sahassaṃ vā satasahassaṃ vā āvajjitvā ñāṇena adhiṭṭhāti 'bahuko homī'"ti (paṭi. ma. 3.10) evaṃ vibhajitvā dassitā iddhi adhiṭṭhānavasena nipphannattā adhiṭṭhānā iddhi nāma.
"So pakatavaṇṇaṃ vijahitvā kumārakavaṇṇaṃ vā dasseti nāgavaṇṇaṃ vā…pe… vividhampi senābyūhaṃ dassetī"ti (paṭi. ma. 3.13) evaṃ āgatā iddhi pakativaṇṇavijahanavikāravasena pavattattā vikubbanā iddhi nāma.
"Idha bhikkhu imamhā kāyā aññaṃ kāyaṃ abhinimmināti rūpiṃ manomaya"nti (paṭi. ma. 3.14) iminā nayena āgatā iddhi sarīrabbhantare aññasseva manomayassa sarīrassa nipphattivasena pavattattā manomayā iddhi nāma.
Herein, the power shown and analyzed thus — "naturally being one, he adverts to being many; having adverted to a hundred, or a thousand, or a hundred thousand, he determines by knowledge, 'may I become many'" (Paṭis. iii.10) — is called "the power consisting in resolve," because it is accomplished by way of resolve.
The power that has come down thus — "having abandoned his natural appearance, he displays the appearance of a boy, or the appearance of a nāga … or he even displays a formation of an army in various ways" (Paṭis. iii.13) — is called "the power consisting in transformation," because it proceeds by way of the transformative abandonment of one's natural appearance.
The power that has come down by this method — "here, a monk creates, from this body, another body, possessed of form, mind-made" (Paṭis. iii.14) — is called "the power consisting in the mind-made body," because it proceeds by way of the production, within the body, of another body, mind-made.
The distinction between transformation and the mind-made body is easy to blur but structurally important: transformation replaces the meditator's own appearance entirely — his natural form is abandoned, and a boy or a nāga is seen where he used to be — while the mind-made body is created in addition to the original body, a genuinely second, independently functioning form produced from within the first. One is a substitution; the other is a multiplication.
These three powers are singled out for extended treatment later in the chapter precisely because they alone depend on the elaborate jhāna-based apparatus — the fourteen taming exercises, the four bases, the sixteen roots — built up over the preceding sections. The remaining seven kinds of power, taken up next, arise through entirely different mechanisms: direct knowledge itself, concentration's own pervasive effect, noble attainment, kamma, merit, esoteric knowledge, and simple skillful effort.
the power consisting in resolve — adhiṭṭhāna (resolve, determination) + iddhi (power); the multiplication power exemplified by "having been one, he becomes many," accomplished by a specific act of determined knowledge.
the power consisting in transformation — vi- (variously) + kṛ- (to make, do); the power by which one's own natural appearance is set aside in favor of an entirely different displayed form.
the power consisting in the mind-made body — mano (mind) + maya (made of); the power by which a second, independently functioning body is drawn out from within the meditator's own physical form.
The Power of Knowledge: Three Children Protected by an Arahantship Not Yet Attained
The fourth power, arising from the pervasive influence of knowledge, is illustrated not by any deliberate meditative feat but by three extraordinary childhood survival stories, each attributed retroactively to the future arahant-path knowledge each child would one day attain in that very lifetime. Bākula, swallowed whole by a fish as an infant after falling into a river, emerged unharmed when a merchant's wife cut the fish open expecting only its flesh. Saṃkicca survived being pierced by a stake and burned on his own mother's funeral pyre while still in her womb, crying out at the very moment of the blow and so revealing that he still lived. And the boy Bhūtapāla, accidentally left outside a locked city gate overnight in a place haunted by fierce spirits, came through three full watches of darkness entirely unharmed. In each case, the text's claim is not that the child somehow already possessed a power he could consciously use, but that the future attainment yet to come somehow already exerted a protective influence backward across the very lifetime that would eventually reach it.
Ñāṇuppattito pana pubbe vā pacchā vā taṃkhaṇe vā ñāṇānubhāvanibbatto viseso ñāṇavipphārā iddhi nāma. Vuttañhetaṃ – "aniccānupassanāya niccasaññāya pahānaṭṭho ijjhatīti ñāṇavipphārā iddhi…pe… arahattamaggena sabbakilesānaṃ pahānaṭṭho ijjhatīti ñāṇavipphārā iddhi. Āyasmato bākkulassa ñāṇavipphārā iddhi. Āyasmato saṃkiccassa ñāṇavipphārā iddhi. Āyasmato bhūtapālassa ñāṇavipphārā iddhī"ti (paṭi. ma. 3.15).
Tattha āyasmā bākulo daharova maṅgaladivase nadiyā nhāpiyamāno dhātiyā pamādena sote patito. Tamenaṃ maccho gilitvā bārāṇasītitthaṃ agamāsi. Tatra taṃ macchabandho gahetvā seṭṭhibhariyāya vikkiṇi. Sā macche sinehaṃ uppādetvā ahameva naṃ pacissāmīti phālentī macchakucchiyaṃ suvaṇṇabimbaṃ viya dārakaṃ disvā putto me laddhoti somanassajātā ahosi. Iti macchakucchiyaṃ arogabhāvo āyasmato bākkulassa pacchimabhavikassa tena attabhāvena paṭilabhitabbaarahattamaggañāṇānubhāvena nibbattattā ñāṇavipphārā iddhi nāma. Vatthu pana vitthārena kathetabbaṃ.
Saṃkiccattherassa pana gabbhagatasseva mātā kālamakāsi. Tassā citakaṃ āropetvā sūlehi vijjhitvā jhāpiyamānāya dārako sūlakoṭiyā akkhikūṭe pahāraṃ labhitvā saddaṃ akāsi. Tato dārako jīvatīti otāretvā kucchiṃ phāletvā dārakaṃ ayyikāya adaṃsu. So tāya paṭijaggito vuddhimanvāya pabbajitvā saha paṭisambhidāhi arahattaṃ pāpuṇi. Iti vuttanayeneva dārucitakāya arogabhāvo āyasmato saṃkiccassa ñāṇavipphārā iddhi nāma.
Bhūtapāladārakassa pana pitā rājagahe daliddamanusso. So dārūnaṃ atthāya sakaṭena aṭaviṃ gantvā dārubhāraṃ katvā sāyaṃ nagaradvārasamīpaṃ patto. Athassa goṇā yugaṃ ossajjitvā nagaraṃ pavisiṃsu. So sakaṭamūle puttakaṃ nisīdāpetvā goṇānaṃ anupadaṃ gacchanto nagarameva pāvisi. Tassa anikkhantasseva dvāraṃ pihitaṃ. Dārakassa vāḷayakkhānucaritepi bahinagare tiyāmarattiṃ arogabhāvo vuttanayeneva ñāṇavipphārā iddhi nāma. Vatthu pana vitthāretabbaṃ.
But the special distinction produced by the power of knowledge — whether before, after, or at the very moment of that knowledge's arising — is called "the power arising from the pervasive influence of knowledge." For this was said: "the abandonment of the perception of permanence through the contemplation of impermanence succeeds — thus it is the power arising from the pervasive influence of knowledge … the abandonment of all defilements through the path of arahantship succeeds — thus it is the power arising from the pervasive influence of knowledge. Venerable Bākula's is the power arising from the pervasive influence of knowledge. Venerable Saṃkicca's is the power arising from the pervasive influence of knowledge. Venerable Bhūtapāla's is the power arising from the pervasive influence of knowledge" (Paṭis. iii.15).
Herein, Venerable Bākula, while still a young child, being bathed in a river on an auspicious day, fell into the current through his nurse's negligence. A fish swallowed him and made its way to a landing-place at Benares. There a fisherman caught it and sold it to a merchant's wife. She, having conceived a fondness for fish, thinking, "I myself shall cook it," and splitting it open, saw within the fish's belly a child like a golden image, and, filled with joy, thought, "I have obtained a son." Thus, his being unharmed within the fish's belly was, for Venerable Bākula — who was in his final existence — produced by the power of the arahant-path knowledge yet to be attained by him within that very existence; therefore it is called "the power arising from the pervasive influence of knowledge." The story should be told in full detail.
As for Elder Saṃkicca: while he was still in the womb, his mother died. Having placed her body on the funeral pyre and pierced it through with stakes, while it was being burned, the child, receiving a blow to the eye-socket from the tip of a stake, cried out. Then, realizing, "the child is alive," they took her down, split open her belly, and gave the child to his grandmother. Raised by her, and having grown up, he went forth, and, together with the discriminating knowledges, attained arahantship. Thus, by the very same method, his being unharmed upon the wooden funeral pyre is called, for Venerable Saṃkicca, "the power arising from the pervasive influence of knowledge."
As for the boy Bhūtapāla: his father was a poor man in Rājagaha. He went by cart to the forest for wood, and, having made up a load of it, reached the vicinity of the city gate in the evening. Then his oxen, having thrown off the yoke, entered the city. He, having seated his little son at the foot of the cart, went following after the oxen, and entered the city himself. Before he could come back out, the gate was shut. That boy's being unharmed for the three watches of the night outside the city, in a place haunted by fierce spirits, is, by the very same method, called "the power arising from the pervasive influence of knowledge." The story should be told in detail.
What makes this power genuinely distinct from the other nine is its direction of causation: in every other kind of power, some already-attained state (a jhāna, a resolve, an accumulated store of merit) produces an effect going forward. Here, the causal arrow runs backward — a knowledge these three children would each attain only later in the very same lifetime is said to have already been protecting them before it existed as an actual attainment, purely by virtue of the fact that it was destined to arise in that specific life-continuum.
The choice of three ordinary, powerless children — an infant, an unborn fetus, and a toddler abandoned by accident — rather than three already-accomplished meditators is a deliberate way of isolating what this power actually is: none of the three did anything, practiced anything, or even possessed the capacity for volition sufficient to invoke a power in any conventional sense. The protection is attributed entirely to the pull of a future they had not yet reached, not to any present skill of their own.
the power arising from the pervasive influence of knowledge — ñāṇa (knowledge) + vipphāra (pervasive spreading, radiating influence) + iddhi (power); a power exerted by knowledge before, during, or even after its actual arising, illustrated here entirely by its "before" case.
one in his final existence — pacchima (last, final) + bhavika (pertaining to existence); the technical description of Bākula, marking him as someone destined to attain arahantship within the very lifetime the story recounts.
discriminating knowledge, analytical insight — the four-fold advanced understanding (of meaning, of doctrine, of language, and of ready wit) that both Bākula and Saṃkicca are said to have attained together with their arahantship, marking them as especially accomplished arahants.
The Power of Concentration: A Blow That Landed, a Pyre That Burned Nothing
The fifth power, arising from the pervasive influence of concentration, works by the same backward and sideways logic as the fourth, but now attached to serenity rather than knowledge. Three of its five canonical examples are given here. Venerable Sāriputta, struck on the head hard enough to sound like thunder by a malicious spirit, took no harm at all because he happened to be absorbed in an attainment at the exact moment of the blow. Elder Sañjīva, mistaken for dead while deep in the attainment of cessation, was set alight by cowherds performing what they took to be a cremation — and not even a thread of his robe burned. And Elder Khāṇukoṇḍañña, absorbed so still and so long in the forest at night that five hundred passing bandits mistook him for a tree stump and piled their entire stolen haul on top of him, rose up unharmed exactly when his own predetermined attainment ended, so startling the bandits that all of them went forth and attained arahantship on the spot.
Samādhito pubbe vā pacchā vā taṃkhaṇe vā samathānubhāvanibbatto viseso samādhivipphārā iddhi. Vuttañhetaṃ "paṭhamajjhānena nīvaraṇānaṃ pahānaṭṭho ijjhatīti samādhivipphārā iddhi…pe… nevasaññānāsaññāyatanasamāpattiyā ākiñcaññāyatanasaññāya pahānaṭṭho ijjhatīti samādhivipphārā iddhi. Āyasmato sāriputtassa samādhivipphārā iddhi, āyasmato sañjīvassa, āyasmato khāṇukoṇḍaññassa, uttarāya upāsikāya, sāmāvatiyā upāsikāya samādhivipphārā iddhī"ti (paṭi. ma. 3.16).
Tattha yadā āyasmato sāriputtassa mahāmoggallānattherena saddhiṃ kapotakandarāyaṃ viharato juṇhāya rattiyā navoropitehi kesehi ajjhokāse nisinnassa eko duṭṭhayakkho sahāyakena yakkhena vāriyamānopi sīse pahāramadāsi. Yassa meghassa viya gajjato saddo ahosi. Tadā thero tassa paharaṇasamaye samāpattiṃ appesi. Athassa tena pahārena na koci ābādho ahosi. Ayaṃ tassāyasmato samādhivipphārā iddhi. Vatthu pana udāne (udā. 34) āgatameva.
Sañjīvattheraṃ pana nirodhasamāpannaṃ kālakatoti sallakkhetvā gopālakādayo tiṇakaṭṭhagomayāni saṅkaḍḍhetvā aggiṃ adaṃsu. Therassa cīvare aṃsumattampi najjhāyittha. Ayamassa anupubbasamāpattivasena pavattasamathānubhāvanibbattattā samādhivipphārā iddhi. Vatthu pana sutte (ma. ni. 1.507) āgatameva.
Khāṇukoṇḍaññatthero pana pakatiyāva samāpattibahulo. So aññatarasmiṃ araññe rattiṃ samāpattiṃ appetvā nisīdi. Pañcasatā corā bhaṇḍakaṃ thenetvā gacchantā "idāni amhākaṃ anupathaṃ āgacchantā natthī"ti vissamitukāmā bhaṇḍakaṃ oropayamānā "khāṇuko aya"nti maññamānā therasseva upari sabbabhaṇḍakāni ṭhapesuṃ. Tesaṃ vissamitvā gacchantānaṃ paṭhamaṃ ṭhapitabhaṇḍakassa gahaṇakāle kālaparicchedavasena thero vuṭṭhāsi. Te therassa calanākāraṃ disvā bhītā viraviṃsu. Thero "mā bhāyittha upāsakā, bhikkhu aha"nti āha. Te āgantvā vanditvā theragatena pasādena pabbajitvā saha paṭisambhidāhi arahattaṃ pāpuṇiṃsu (dha. pa. aṭṭha. 1.1). Ayamettha pañcahi bhaṇḍakasatehi ajjhotthaṭassa therassa ābādhābhāvo samādhivipphārā iddhi.
The special distinction produced by the power of serenity, whether before, after, or at the very moment of concentration, is "the power arising from the pervasive influence of concentration." For this was said: "the abandonment of the hindrances through the first jhāna succeeds — thus it is the power arising from the pervasive influence of concentration … the abandonment of the perception of the base of nothingness through the attainment of the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception succeeds — thus it is the power arising from the pervasive influence of concentration. Venerable Sāriputta's is the power arising from the pervasive influence of concentration; Venerable Sañjīva's; Venerable Khāṇukoṇḍañña's; the laywoman Uttarā's; the laywoman Sāmāvatī's is the power arising from the pervasive influence of concentration" (Paṭis. iii.16).
Herein, when Venerable Sāriputta, dwelling together with Elder Mahāmoggallāna at Kapotakandarā, was sitting in the open air on a moonlit night with his hair newly shaved, a certain malicious spirit, although restrained by a companion spirit, struck him a blow on the head — a blow whose sound was like thunder from a roaring cloud. At that very time, the elder had entered an attainment at the moment of the blow. And from that blow, no harm whatsoever befell him. This is that venerable one's power arising from the pervasive influence of concentration. The story has already come down in the Udāna (Ud. 34).
As for Elder Sañjīva: cowherds and others, observing him, while he had entered the attainment of cessation, as having died, gathered grass, sticks, and cow-dung and set fire to it. Not even a single thread of the elder's robe was burned. This is his power arising from the pervasive influence of concentration, produced by the power of serenity proceeding by way of the successive attainments. The story has already come down in the sutta (M.N. 1.507).
Elder Khāṇukoṇḍañña, for his part, was by nature one who dwelt much in attainment. Once, in a certain forest, having entered an attainment at night, he sat down. Five hundred bandits, having stolen goods and being on their way, wishing to rest, and thinking, "now there is no one following on our path," while setting down their goods, thinking, "this is a stump," placed all their goods on top of the elder himself. Then, when those who had rested were about to leave and were taking up the goods that had been set down first, the elder, at the predetermined ending of his own attainment, rose up. Seeing the elder's movement, they cried out in fear. The elder said, "Do not be afraid, lay followers — I am a monk." They came, paid homage, and, through the confidence inspired by the elder's conduct, went forth, and, together with the discriminating knowledges, attained arahantship (Dhp. Comm. 1.1). Here, the elder's freedom from harm, though buried beneath five hundred loads of goods, is "the power arising from the pervasive influence of concentration."
Each of these three stories isolates a different temporal relationship named in the definition itself: Sāriputta's protection occurs precisely "at the very moment" of concentration, since he happened to be absorbed exactly when struck; Sañjīva's occurs while he remains in an attainment that has already begun and continues through the danger; and Khāṇukoṇḍañña's ends at a moment predetermined in advance, his own rising serving as the very thing that reveals the danger and resolves it. None of the three deliberately used concentration as a shield — the protection was simply a side-effect of a state they had entered for its own sake.
The bandits' conversion is a small but pointed narrative choice: the story could easily have ended with their fear and flight, but instead it turns their terror at witnessing an apparent stump come to life into the direct cause of their own eventual arahantship — the very same event that demonstrates concentration's protective power also becomes the occasion for genuine spiritual transformation in those who witness it.
the power arising from the pervasive influence of concentration — samādhi (concentration) + vipphāra (pervasive influence) + iddhi (power); parallel in structure to the power of knowledge, but attached to serenity (samatha) rather than insight-based knowledge.
the attainment of cessation — the profound state, described in chapter eleven's closing benefits, in which Elder Sañjīva was mistakenly believed dead and placed on a funeral pyre, protected throughout by the very concentration that produced his apparent lifelessness.
by way of a predetermined duration — kāla (time) + pariccheda (a determination, a boundary); describing how an accomplished meditator can set in advance exactly how long an attainment will last, as Khāṇukoṇḍañña evidently did before the bandits ever arrived.
The Power of Concentration, Continued: Boiling Oil and a Frozen Arrow
Two further examples of the power of concentration, both involving laywomen rather than monastics, close out this fifth kind of power. Uttarā, doused with a pan of boiling oil by a jealous rival, entered loving-kindness in the very instant of the attack, and the scalding oil simply rolled off her body like a drop of water off a lotus leaf. And Sāmāvatī, falsely accused before her own husband, King Udena, of hiding a venomous snake in her lute to assassinate him, pervaded the enraged king with loving-kindness the moment he drew a poison-tipped arrow against her — leaving him standing there, trembling, physically unable either to release the arrow or to lower his bow, until she herself calmly told him to stand down.
Uttarā pana upāsikā puṇṇaseṭṭhissa dhītā. Tassā sirimā nāma gaṇikā issāpakatā tattatelakaṭāhaṃ sīse āsiñci. Uttarā taṃkhaṇaññeva mettaṃ samāpajji. Telaṃ pokkharapattato udakabindu viya vivaṭṭamānaṃ agamāsi. Ayamassā samādhivipphārā iddhi. Vatthu pana vitthāretabbaṃ.
Sāmāvatī nāma udenassa rañño aggamahesī. Māgaṇḍiyabrāhmaṇo attano dhītāya aggamahesiṭṭhānaṃ patthayamāno tassā vīṇāya āsīvisaṃ pakkhipāpetvā rājānaṃ āha "mahārāja, sāmāvatī taṃ māretukāmā vīṇāya āsīvisaṃ gahetvā pariharatī"ti. Rājā taṃ disvā kupito sāmāvatiṃ vadhissāmīti dhanuṃ āropetvā visapītaṃ khurappaṃ sannayhi. Sāmāvatī saparivārā rājānaṃ mettāya phari. Rājā neva saraṃ khipituṃ na oropetuṃ sakkonto vedhamāno aṭṭhāsi. Tato naṃ devī āha "kiṃ, mahārāja, kilamasī"ti? "Āma kilamāmī"ti. "Tena hi dhanuṃ oropehī"ti. Saro rañño pādamūleyeva pati. Tato naṃ devī "mahārāja, appaduṭṭhassa nappadussitabba"nti ovadi. Iti rañño saraṃ muñcituṃ avisahanabhāvo sāmāvatiyā upāsikāya samādhivipphārā iddhīti.
The laywoman Uttarā was the daughter of the merchant Puṇṇa. A courtesan named Sirimā, overcome by jealousy, poured a pan of boiling oil over her head. Uttarā, in that very instant, entered upon loving-kindness. The oil rolled off her, turning aside like a drop of water off a lotus leaf. This is her power arising from the pervasive influence of concentration. The story should be told in detail.
Sāmāvatī was the chief queen of King Udena. The brahmin Māgaṇḍiya, wishing to secure the position of chief queen for his own daughter, had a venomous snake placed inside her lute, and said to the king, "Great king, Sāmāvatī, wishing to kill you, keeps a venomous snake concealed in her lute." The king, seeing this and enraged, thinking, "I shall kill Sāmāvatī," drew his bow and fitted a poison-tipped arrow. Sāmāvatī, together with her retinue, pervaded the king with loving-kindness. The king, able neither to release the arrow nor to lower it, stood there trembling. Then the queen said to him, "Are you tired, great king?" "Yes, I am tired." "Then lower your bow." The arrow fell right at the king's own feet. Then the queen admonished him: "Great king, one who is not at fault should not be wronged." Thus, the king's inability to release the arrow is the laywoman Sāmāvatī's power arising from the pervasive influence of concentration.
Both stories share a specific structural feature worth noting: in neither case does the woman act against her attacker at all — Uttarā does not deflect the oil, and Sāmāvatī does not disarm the king. Each simply enters loving-kindness toward the very person threatening her, and the protective effect follows as a byproduct of that state rather than as any targeted counter-measure. The power operates entirely through the quality of the practitioner's own mind, never through any action directed outward.
Sāmāvatī's brief, almost gentle exchange with the king afterward — "are you tired?" followed by a simple instruction to lower the bow — is a striking tonal choice for a scene of attempted murder: rather than triumph, reproach, or fear, the text gives her a composure so complete that she can address her would-be killer's physical exhaustion before addressing the injustice done to her, closing with a single line of moral instruction rather than any accusation.
a female lay follower — upa- (near) + ās- (to sit); both Uttarā and Sāmāvatī are given this title rather than any monastic one, marking the power of concentration as fully available to devoted laypeople, not reserved for ordained practitioners.
a lotus leaf — the classic Indian image for a naturally water-repellent surface, used here to describe exactly how the boiling oil rolled harmlessly off Uttarā's body.
a crescent-headed, poison-tipped arrow — the specific weapon King Udena fitted to his bow, its lethal preparation underscoring just how close and how deliberate the danger to Sāmāvatī actually was.
The Power of the Noble Ones: Seeing Freely, In Any Direction
The sixth power belongs only to arahants who have attained complete mastery over their own minds: the ability to perceive the non-repulsive in what is genuinely repulsive, the repulsive in what is genuinely pleasant, either perception freely in objects that are a mixture of both, and, beyond all of that, a perfect six-factored equanimity that sets both perceptions aside entirely and simply looks on, mindful and fully aware, unmoved in either direction. Where an ordinary meditator can only cultivate loving-kindness toward an unpleasant object or foulness-perception toward an attractive one as a deliberate corrective technique, the arahant endowed with this power can shift between these perceptions — or dispense with the shift altogether — completely at will.
Paṭikkūlādīsu appaṭikkūlasaññivihārādikā pana ariyā iddhi nāma. Yathāha – "katamā ariyā iddhi? Idha – bhikkhu sace ākaṅkhati 'paṭikkūle appaṭikkūlasaññī vihareyya'nti, appaṭikkūlasaññī tattha viharati…pe… upekkhako tattha viharati sato sampajāno"ti (paṭi. ma. 3.17). Ayañhi cetovasippattānaṃ ariyānaṃyeva sambhavato ariyā iddhīti vuccati.
Etāya hi samannāgato khīṇāsavo bhikkhu paṭikkūle aniṭṭhe vatthusmiṃ mettāpharaṇaṃ vā dhātumanasikāraṃ vā karonto appaṭikkūlasaññī viharati. Appaṭikkūle iṭṭhe vatthusmiṃ asubhapharaṇaṃ vā aniccanti manasikāraṃ vā karonto paṭikkūlasaññī viharati. Tathā paṭikkūlāpaṭikkūlesu tadeva mettāpharaṇaṃ vā dhātumanasikāraṃ vā karonto appaṭikkūlasaññī viharati. Appaṭikkūlapaṭikkūlesu ca tadeva asubhapharaṇaṃ vā aniccanti manasikāraṃ vā karonto paṭikkūlasaññī viharati. Cakkhunā rūpaṃ disvā neva sumano hotītiādinā nayena vuttaṃ pana chaḷaṅgupekkhaṃ pavattayamāno paṭikkūle ca appaṭikkūle ca tadubhayaṃ abhinivajjitvā upekkhako viharati sato sampajāno. Paṭisambhidāyañhi "kathaṃ paṭikkūle appaṭikkūlasaññī viharati? Aniṭṭhasmiṃ vatthusmiṃ mettāya vā pharati dhātuso vā upasaṃharatī"tiādinā (paṭi. ma. 3.17) nayena ayameva attho vibhatto. Ayaṃ cetovasippattānaṃ ariyānaṃyeva sambhavato ariyā iddhīti vuccati.
The dwelling with the perception of the non-repulsive amid repulsive things, and so on, is called "the power of the noble ones." As it is said: "what is the power of the noble ones? Here, if a monk wishes, 'may I dwell perceiving the non-repulsive in the repulsive,' he dwells perceiving the non-repulsive there … he dwells looking on with equanimity, mindful and fully aware" (Paṭis. iii.17). This is called "the power of the noble ones" precisely because it occurs only among the noble ones who have attained mastery over mind.
For an arahant with taints destroyed, endowed with this power, dwells perceiving the non-repulsive when, toward a repulsive, undesirable object, he practices the pervasion of loving-kindness or attention to the elements. He dwells perceiving the repulsive when, toward a non-repulsive, desirable object, he practices the pervasion of foulness or the attention, "impermanent." Likewise, toward objects that are both repulsive and non-repulsive together, practicing that same pervasion of loving-kindness or attention to the elements, he dwells perceiving the non-repulsive. And toward objects that are both non-repulsive and repulsive together, practicing that same pervasion of foulness or the attention, "impermanent," he dwells perceiving the repulsive. But, carrying out the six-factored equanimity described by the method beginning, "having seen a form with the eye, he is neither glad nor sad" — he dwells, having set aside both the repulsive and the non-repulsive together, looking on with equanimity, mindful and fully aware. For in the Paṭisambhidāmagga this very meaning is analyzed by the method beginning: "how does one dwell perceiving the non-repulsive in the repulsive? Toward an undesirable object, one either pervades it with loving-kindness, or brings it to mind by way of the elements" (Paṭis. iii.17). This is called "the power of the noble ones" precisely because it occurs only among the noble ones who have attained mastery over mind.
What separates this from an ordinary meditator practicing loving-kindness or foulness-contemplation as a corrective exercise is speed and freedom of direction: the arahant possessing this power does not need to work up to the corrective perception gradually as a beginner would, and, crucially, can move in any of four directions at will — non-repulsive amid the repulsive, repulsive amid the non-repulsive, either freely amid a mixture of both, or beyond both perceptions entirely into six-factored equanimity — rather than being limited to a single fixed technique for a single fixed situation.
Naming this "the power of the noble ones" specifically, rather than simply "an advanced meditative skill," makes an important point about what actually earns the label "power" in this system: it is not raw technical ability so much as the complete freedom from being pushed around by whatever object happens to present itself — the noble one's mind responds to the repulsive and the pleasant exactly as it chooses, never as either object dictates.
the power of the noble ones — ariya (noble, one who has attained a supramundane path or fruit) + iddhi (power); unique among the ten powers in being defined by the practitioner's spiritual attainment rather than by any specific meditative technique or physical feat.
six-factored equanimity — cha (six) + aṅga (factor) + upekkhā (equanimity); the perfectly balanced state, described through the six sense-doors, in which an arahant remains neither glad nor sad regardless of what is seen, heard, or otherwise experienced.
one whose taints are destroyed, an arahant — khīṇa (destroyed) + āsava (taint, influx); the specific class of practitioner this power is said to belong to, since it presupposes the complete mastery over mind that only full liberation provides.
Kamma's Free Gift, and Merit's Extravagant Rewards
The seventh and eighth powers require no cultivation whatsoever — they are simply the automatic consequence of what a being already is. Every bird, every deva, the first humans of the aeon, and certain unhappy spirits fly through the air with no jhāna or insight at all: this is the power born of the result of kamma, present from birth. The power of merit belongs instead to those whose accumulated good deeds have ripened to an extraordinary degree — a wheel-turning monarch traveling through the sky with his entire army, and, most memorably, the five members of a single household: the merchant Meṇḍaka, whose upward glance alone fills thousands of storehouses with rain-falling rice; his wife, whose single measure of cooked rice feeds the whole of India without ever running out; his son, whose bag of a thousand coins never empties no matter how much he gives away; his daughter-in-law, whose single basket of grain likewise never diminishes; and his slave, whose single plow cuts fourteen furrows in the time it takes to cut seven.
Pakkhīādīnaṃ pana vehāsagamanādikā kammavipākajā iddhi nāma. Yathāha – "katamā kammavipākajā iddhi? Sabbesaṃ pakkhīnaṃ sabbesaṃ devānaṃ ekaccānaṃ manussānaṃ ekaccānañca vinipātikānaṃ ayaṃ kammavipākajā iddhī"ti (paṭi. ma. 3.18). Ettha hi sabbesaṃ pakkhīnaṃ jhānaṃ vā vipassanaṃ vā vināyeva ākāsena gamanaṃ. Tathā sabbesaṃ devānaṃ paṭhamakappikānañca ekaccānaṃ manussānaṃ. Tathā piyaṅkaramātā (saṃ. ni. 1.240) yakkhinī uttaramātā phussamittā dhammaguttāti evamādīnaṃ ekaccānaṃ vinipātikānaṃ ākāsena gamanaṃ kammavipākajā iddhīti.
Cakkavattiādīnaṃ vehāsagamanādikā pana puññavato iddhi nāma. Yathāha "katamā puññavato iddhi? Rājā cakkavattī vehāsaṃ gacchati saddhiṃ caturaṅginiyā senāya antamaso assabandhagobandhapurise upādāya. Jotikassa gahapatissa puññavato iddhi. Jaṭilakassa gahapatissa puññavato iddhi. Ghositassa gahapatissa puññavato iddhi. Meṇḍakassa gahapatissa puññavato iddhi. Pañcannaṃ mahāpuññānaṃ puññavato iddhī"ti. Saṅkhepato pana paripākaṃ gate puññasambhāre ijjhanakaviseso puññavato iddhi.
Ettha ca jotikassa gahapatissa pathaviṃ bhinditvā maṇipāsādo uṭṭhahi. Catusaṭṭhi ca kapparukkhāti ayamassa puññavato iddhi. Jaṭilakassa asītihattho suvaṇṇapabbato nibbatti. Ghositassa sattasu ṭhānesu māraṇatthāya upakkame katepi arogabhāvo puññavato iddhi. Meṇḍakassa ekakarīsamatte padese sattaratanamayānaṃ meṇḍakānaṃ pātubhāvo puññavato iddhi. Pañca mahāpuññā nāma meṇḍakaseṭṭhi, tassa bhariyā candapadumasirī, putto dhanañcayaseṭṭhi, suṇisā sumanadevī, dāso puṇṇo nāmāti. Tesu seṭṭhissa sīsaṃ nhātassa ākāsaṃ ullokanakāle aḍḍhateḷasakoṭṭhasahassāni ākāsato rattasālīnaṃ pūrenti. Bhariyāya nāḷikodanamattampi gahetvā sakalajambudīpavāsike parivisamānāya bhattaṃ na khīyati. Puttassa sahassatthavikaṃ gahetvā sakalajambudīpavāsikānampi dentassa kahāpaṇā na khīyanti. Suṇisāya ekaṃ vīhitumbaṃ gahetvā sakalajambudīpavāsikānampi bhājayamānāya dhaññaṃ na khīyati. Dāsassa ekena naṅgalena kasato ito satta ito sattāti cuddasa maggā honti. Ayaṃ nesaṃ puññavato iddhi.
The flying through the air and the like, characteristic of birds and the rest, is called "the power born of the result of kamma." As it is said: "what is the power born of the result of kamma? This is the power born of the result of kamma belonging to all birds, all devas, certain humans, and certain of those in states of loss" (Paṭis. iii.18). For here, all birds fly through the air without any jhāna or insight at all. Likewise all devas, the humans of the first aeon, and certain other humans. Likewise, the flying through the air of the yakkhinī Piyaṅkaramātā (S.N. 1.240), and of Uttaramātā, Phussamittā, Dhammaguttā, and others among certain of those in states of loss, is "the power born of the result of kamma."
The flying through the air and the like, characteristic of wheel-turning monarchs and the like, is called "the power of one possessed of merit." As it is said: "what is the power of one possessed of merit? A wheel-turning king travels through the air together with his four-fold army, down to the very grooms and cowherds. The householder Jotika's is the power of one possessed of merit. The householder Jaṭilaka's is the power of one possessed of merit. The householder Ghosita's is the power of one possessed of merit. The householder Meṇḍaka's is the power of one possessed of merit. The power of the five great meritorious ones is the power of one possessed of merit." In brief, the special success that occurs when a store of merit has come to full ripeness is "the power of one possessed of merit."
Herein, for the householder Jotika, breaking through the earth, a jeweled palace arose, together with sixty-four wishing-trees — this was his power of one possessed of merit. For Jaṭilaka, a golden mountain eighty cubits high arose. For Ghosita, remaining unharmed even when attempts were made to kill him in seven different ways, is his power of one possessed of merit. For Meṇḍaka, the appearance, within an area of a single karīsa, of goats made of the seven kinds of treasure, is his power of one possessed of merit. The five great meritorious ones are: the merchant Meṇḍaka; his wife, Candapadumasirī; his son, the merchant Dhanañcaya; his daughter-in-law, Sumanadevī; and his slave, named Puṇṇa. Among them: when the merchant, having washed his head, looks up at the sky, twelve thousand five hundred storehouses' worth of red rice grains fill up from the sky. When his wife takes merely a single measure of cooked rice and serves the inhabitants of the whole of Jambudīpa, the food is never exhausted. When his son takes a bag of a thousand coins and gives to the inhabitants of the whole of Jambudīpa, the coins are never exhausted. When his daughter-in-law takes a single basket of grain and distributes it to the inhabitants of the whole of Jambudīpa, the grain is never exhausted. When his slave plows with a single plow, "seven furrows this way, seven furrows that way" become fourteen furrows at once. This is their power of one possessed of merit.
The explicit inclusion of "certain of those in states of loss" among the beings possessing kamma-born flight is a small but notable point of doctrinal even-handedness: this power is not reserved for fortunate rebirths, since even certain suffering spirits, by the specific nature of the kamma that produced their particular unhappy existence, can fly through the air exactly as birds and devas do — a capacity entirely independent of whether the rebirth itself was a good or bad one.
The five-member household is a deliberately egalitarian illustration of merit's power: the same extraordinary abundance extends equally to the wealthy merchant, his wife, his son, his daughter-in-law, and — pointedly — his slave, whose plow accomplishes double the normal work. Merit, unlike social status, is presented here as something any member of a household can independently accumulate and enjoy the fruits of, regardless of rank.
the power born of the result of kamma — kamma (action) + vipāka (result, ripening) + ja (born of) + iddhi (power); a power requiring no cultivation at all, simply inherent in the kind of being one already is, such as a bird's natural flight.
the power of one possessed of merit — puñña (merit, good kamma) + vant (possessing) + iddhi (power); distinguished from kamma-born power by requiring an extraordinary, specifically ripened accumulation of merit rather than merely the ordinary kammic endowment of one's species.
a traditional unit of land area — the measure given for the plot in which Meṇḍaka's miraculous jeweled goats appeared, roughly equivalent to a few acres depending on the specific regional standard.
Magical Knowledge, and Success Through Simple Effort — The Ten Complete
The last two of the ten powers close out the list. Holders of spells fly through the air and conjure visions of elephants and marching armies purely through recited magical knowledge — a power distinct from all the others in requiring neither jhāna, nor merit, nor kamma, but only the correct esoteric formula. And the tenth and broadest power is simply success through proper effort in any undertaking at all: the canonical text applies it narrowly to spiritual practice itself, culminating in the abandonment of every defilement through the arahant path, but the commentarial tradition extends it generously to any skillfully executed task whatsoever — a craft, a medical treatment, the mastery of a body of scriptural learning, or even ordinary plowing and sowing done well. With all ten now named, the chapter clarifies precisely which of them the canonical phrase "the various kinds of supernormal power" was actually pointing to at the very start of this whole discussion: strictly, only the first, the power of resolve — though the powers of transformation and the mind-made body are meant to be understood as included as well.
Vijjādharādīnaṃ vehāsagamanādikā pana vijjāmayā iddhi. Yathāha "katamā vijjāmayā iddhi? Vijjādharā vijjaṃ parijapitvā vehāsaṃ gacchanti. Ākāse antalikkhe hatthimpi dassenti…pe… vividhampi senābyūhaṃ dassentī"ti (paṭi. ma. 3.18).
Tena tena pana sammāpayogena tassa tassa kammassa ijjhanaṃ tattha tattha sammāpayogapaccayā ijjhanaṭṭhena iddhi. Yathāha – "nekkhammena kāmacchandassa pahānaṭṭho ijjhatīti tattha tattha sammāpayogapaccayā ijjhanaṭṭhena iddhi…pe… arahattamaggena sabbakilesānaṃ pahānaṭṭho ijjhatīti tattha tattha sammāpayogapaccayā ijjhanaṭṭhena iddhī"ti (paṭi. ma. 3.18). Ettha ca paṭipattisaṅkhātasseva sammāpayogassa dīpanavasena purimapāḷisadisāva pāḷi āgatā. Aṭṭhakathāyaṃ pana sakaṭabyūhādikaraṇavasena yaṃkiñci sippakammaṃ yaṃkiñci vejjakammaṃ tiṇṇaṃ bedānaṃ uggahaṇaṃ tiṇṇaṃ piṭakānaṃ uggahaṇaṃ antamaso kasanavapanādīni upādāya taṃ taṃ kammaṃ katvā nibbattaviseso tattha tattha sammāpayogapaccayā ijjhanaṭṭhena iddhīti āgatā.
Iti imāsu dasasu iddhīsu iddhividhāyāti imasmiṃ pade adhiṭṭhānā iddhiyeva āgatā. Imasmiṃ panatthe vikubbanāmanomayāiddhiyopi icchitabbā eva.
The flying through the air and the like, characteristic of holders of spells and the like, is "the power consisting in magical knowledge." As it is said: "what is the power consisting in magical knowledge? Holders of spells, having recited a spell, go through the air. In the sky, in open space, they display even an elephant … they even display a formation of an army in various ways" (Paṭis. iii.18).
But the succeeding, through this or that proper application, of this or that task, is "the power that succeeds, in the sense of succeeding, through proper application in this or that particular matter." As it is said: "the abandonment of sensual desire through renunciation succeeds — thus it is the power that succeeds through proper application in this or that particular matter … the abandonment of all defilements through the path of arahantship succeeds — thus it is the power that succeeds through proper application in this or that particular matter" (Paṭis. iii.18). And here, the canonical text has come down showing only proper application reckoned as spiritual practice, in a manner similar to the preceding passage. But in the commentary, it has come down more broadly, such that the special distinction produced by performing this or that task — whether arranging a cart in formation and the like, any craft-work whatsoever, any medical work whatsoever, the learning of the three Vedas, the learning of the three Piṭakas, or even, at the very least, such things as plowing and sowing — is likewise "the power that succeeds, in the sense of succeeding, through proper application in this or that particular matter."
Thus, among these ten kinds of power, in the phrase "the various kinds of supernormal power," it is only the power consisting in resolve that is actually intended. But in the present context, the powers of transformation and of the mind-made body should certainly be included as well.
The commentarial expansion of the tenth power — from the canonical text's narrow focus on spiritual practice alone to the broader inclusion of any skillfully performed craft, medical treatment, or scriptural mastery — is a significant interpretive move: it effectively declares that genuine competence in any field of human endeavor, achieved through correct and sustained effort, belongs to the very same conceptual category as a monk's progress along the path to arahantship. Both are simply instances of proper application succeeding at its intended task.
The closing clarification — that the canonical phrase which opened this entire discussion technically names only the first of the ten powers, with transformation and the mind-made body included only by extension — is a useful piece of housekeeping before the chapter turns, in its remaining sections, to explaining exactly how these three specific powers are performed in practice. The other seven, having now been fully surveyed, will not be revisited.
the power consisting in magical knowledge — vijjā (knowledge, here specifically esoteric or spell-based knowledge) + maya (consisting of, made of) + iddhi (power); a power activated by recited formulas rather than by meditative attainment of any kind.
proper application, correct effort — sammā (properly, rightly) + payoga (application, effort); the single unifying principle behind the tenth power, whether applied to the spiritual path or to any worldly craft or skill.
the three Vedas / the three Piṭakas — bracketed together here as examples of the extensive, disciplined scriptural learning whose successful mastery the commentary counts as its own kind of "power," on a par with any practical craft.
Directing the Mind Toward Power: The Framework That Makes Multiplication Possible
Having surveyed all ten kinds of power in the abstract, the chapter now turns to explaining, mechanically, how the power of resolve actually produces its most famous feat — a single monk, wishing to walk about, recite, or answer questions before a large gathering, becoming a hundred or even a thousand. The canonical formula's own verbs are unpacked first: "directs" describes the preparatory mind being pulled away from its kasiṇa-object and pointed toward the goal of supernormal power, while "inclines" describes that mind being made to lean fully toward the specific power about to be attained. The chapter then names the four supporting structures that make this transformation possible at all: four grounds, four bases, eight footings, and sixteen roots — each to be explained individually in the sections that follow, before determination by knowledge completes the process.
Iddhividhāyāti iddhikoṭṭhāsāya, iddhivikappāya vā. Cittaṃ abhinīharati abhininnāmetīti so bhikkhu vuttappakāravasena tasmiṃ citte abhiññāpādake jāte iddhividhādhigamatthāya parikammacittaṃ abhinīharati kasiṇārammaṇato apanetvā iddhividhābhimukhaṃ peseti. Abhininnāmetīti adhigantabbaiddhipoṇaṃ iddhipabbhāraṃ karoti. Soti so evaṃ katacittābhinīhāro bhikkhu. Anekavihitanti anekavidhaṃ nānappakārakaṃ. Iddhividhanti iddhikoṭṭhāsaṃ. Paccanubhotīti paccanubhavati, phusati sacchikaroti pāpuṇātīti attho. Idānissa anekavihitabhāvaṃ dassento "ekopi hutvā"tiādimāha. Tattha ekopi hutvāti iddhikaraṇato pubbe pakatiyā ekopi hutvā. Bahudhā hotīti bahūnaṃ santike caṅkamitukāmo vā sajjhāyaṃ vā kattukāmo vā pañhaṃ vā pucchitukāmo hutvā satampi sahassampi hoti. Kathaṃ panāyamevaṃ hoti? Iddhiyā catasso bhūmiyo cattāro pādā aṭṭha padāni soḷasa ca mūlāni sampādetvā ñāṇena adhiṭṭhahanto.
"The various kinds of supernormal power": "power" here means by way of a category of power, or a division of power. "He directs and inclines his mind": that monk, in the manner already stated, when that mind has become the basis for direct knowledge, directs the preparatory mind toward the accomplishment of supernormal power — removing it from the kasiṇa-object and sending it toward supernormal power. "Inclines" means he makes it lean, makes it slope, toward the power to be attained. "He" is that monk who has thus directed his mind. "Various" means manifold, of different kinds. "Kind of power" means a category of power. "He experiences" means he undergoes, touches, realizes, attains — this is the meaning. Now, showing his manifold state, it is said, beginning, "having been one." Herein, "having been one" means having naturally been one before performing the power. "He becomes many": wishing to walk about, or to recite, or to ask a question in the presence of many people, he becomes even a hundred, even a thousand. How, then, does this come about? By accomplishing the four grounds, the four bases, the eight footings, and the sixteen roots of power, and then determining by knowledge.
The word-by-word gloss of "directs" and "inclines" is careful to preserve a real distinction between two separate mental movements: the first is essentially a redirection, pulling attention away from the kasiṇa-disk that has served as the object throughout every prior stage of practice, and the second is a positive orientation, actively leaning the freed attention toward the specific power now being sought. Neither step alone would suffice — a mind merely detached from its old object, without also being actively inclined toward the new goal, would simply drift rather than accomplish anything.
The four-part framework about to be explained — grounds, bases, footings, and roots — should not be read as four alternative or competing accounts of the same thing, but as four different analytical lenses on a single underlying process, each drawn from a different canonical source and each emphasizing a different aspect: the grounds locate power within the jhānas themselves, the bases identify its immediate causal factors, the footings distinguish those factors from concentration proper, and the roots specify the qualities that make the resulting concentration genuinely unshakeable.
the preparatory mind — parikamma (preliminary work) + citta (mind); the specific consciousness performing the groundwork immediately before a supernormal power is actually accomplished, distinct from both the underlying jhāna-consciousness and the final determining act.
ground / base / footing / root — four distinct technical frameworks (four, four, eight, and sixteen items respectively) the chapter will now define in turn, together constituting the complete structural analysis of how supernormal power is produced.
to incline, to make lean toward — abhi- (toward) + ni- (down) + nam- (to bend); the specific verb for actively orienting the freed mind toward the goal of supernormal power, distinct from the prior, merely subtractive act of directing it away from its old object.
The Four Grounds: Why the Fourth Jhāna Alone Is Power's True Home
The first of the four frameworks, the "grounds" of power, simply identifies each of the four jhānas by its own dominant quality — seclusion for the first, joy and pleasure for the second, equanimity and pleasure for the third, neither-pain-nor-pleasure for the fourth. But the chapter draws a sharp distinction among these four: only the fourth jhāna is power's genuine, direct ground. The first three merely prepare the way, since their joy and pleasure leave the meditator's body pervaded by a perception of lightness that makes it workable — but the actual accomplishment of power itself belongs to the fourth jhāna alone.
Tattha catasso bhūmiyoti cattāri jhānāni veditabbāni. Vuttañhetaṃ dhammasenāpatinā "iddhiyā katamā catasso bhūmiyo? Vivekajabhūmi paṭhamaṃ jhānaṃ, pītisukhabhūmi dutiyaṃ jhānaṃ, upekkhāsukhabhūmi tatiyaṃ jhānaṃ, adukkhamasukhabhūmi catutthaṃ jhānaṃ. Iddhiyā imā catasso bhūmiyo iddhilābhāya iddhipaṭilābhāya iddhivikubbanatāya iddhivisavitāya iddhivasitāya iddhivesārajjāya saṃvattantī"ti (paṭi. ma. 3.9). Ettha ca purimāni tīṇi jhānāni yasmā pītipharaṇena ca sukhapharaṇena ca sukhasaññañca lahusaññañca okkamitvā lahumudukammaññakāyo iddhiṃ pāpuṇāti, tasmā iminā pariyāyena iddhilābhāya saṃvattanato sambhārabhūmiyoti veditabbāni. Catutthajjhānaṃ pana iddhilābhāya pakatibhūmiyeva.
Herein, "the four grounds" should be understood as the four jhānas. For this was said by the General of the Dhamma: "what are the four grounds of power? The first jhāna is the ground of seclusion; the second jhāna is the ground of joy and pleasure; the third jhāna is the ground of equanimity and pleasure; the fourth jhāna is the ground of neither-pain-nor-pleasure. These four grounds of power lead to the obtaining of power, to the attainment of power, to the transformation of power, to the fullness of power, to mastery of power, and to confidence in power" (Paṭis. iii.9). And here, since, by the pervasion of joy and the pervasion of pleasure, the first three jhānas cause the meditator to enter upon a perception of pleasure and a perception of lightness, so that his body becomes light and workable and thereby attains power, these three should be understood, by this manner of speaking, as "grounds of the requisite conditions," inasmuch as they lead to the obtaining of power only in this indirect sense. The fourth jhāna, however, is the true, direct ground for the obtaining of power.
The distinction between the first three jhānas as merely "grounds of the requisite conditions" and the fourth as the "true ground" mirrors a pattern already familiar from this treatise's very first chapters on jhāna: joy and pleasure are never treated as ends in themselves, but as intermediate stages whose real function is to leave a residue — here, a perception of bodily lightness — that becomes useful only once it has been carried forward into the calmer, more refined fourth jhāna where power actually arises.
It is worth noting that "lightness" here is not merely metaphorical: the text is quite specific that the actual physical sensation of the body becoming light and workable is the direct causal mechanism by which the earlier jhānas contribute to supernormal power, connecting an abstract meditative attainment to a concrete, felt bodily quality that the meditator can presumably notice directly.
a ground, a plane, a stage — here applied to each of the four jhānas as the specific "ground" from which power either indirectly prepares (the first three) or directly arises (the fourth).
a ground of requisite conditions — sambhāra (requisite, preparatory material) + bhūmi (ground); the technical status assigned to the first three jhānas, marking them as preparatory rather than the direct source of power itself.
the perception of lightness — lahu (light, buoyant) + saññā (perception); the specific quality of mind, arising from the pervasion of joy and pleasure in the earlier jhānas, that makes the body workable enough for the fourth jhāna's power to take hold.
The Four Bases: Desire, Energy, Mind, and Investigation, Each Paired with Striving
The second framework, the four bases of power, names the four possible predominant factors behind the concentration that leads to power — desire, energy, mind, or investigation — each one paired with the same four-fold "volitional formations of striving" (the effort to prevent, abandon, develop, and maintain, familiar from the four right efforts elsewhere in the canon). The chapter offers two complementary etymologies for "base" itself: in one sense, it is the foundation supporting the concentration and its associated mental factors; in another, more literal sense, it is simply "that by which one advances" — the specific means by which the goal of power is actually reached, exactly as a foot carries a person forward step by step.
Cattāro pādāti cattāro iddhipādā veditabbā. Vuttañhetaṃ "iddhiyā katame cattāro pādā? Idha bhikkhu chandasamādhipadhānasaṅkhārasamannāgataṃ iddhipādaṃ bhāveti. Vīriya… citta… vīmaṃsāsamādhipadhānasaṅkhārasamannāgataṃ iddhipādaṃ bhāveti. Iddhiyā ime cattāro pādā iddhilābhāya…pe… iddhivesārajjāya saṃvattantī"ti (paṭi. ma. 3.9). Ettha ca chandahetuko chandādhiko vā samādhi chandasamādhi. Kattukamyatāchandaṃ adhipatiṃ karitvā paṭiladdhasamādhissetaṃ adhivacanaṃ. Padhānabhūtā saṅkhārā padhānasaṅkhārā. Catukiccasādhakassa sammappadhānavīriyassetaṃ adhivacanaṃ. Samannāgatanti chandasamādhinā ca padhānasaṅkhārehi ca upetaṃ. Iddhipādanti nipphattipariyāyena vā ijjhanaṭṭhena, ijjhanti etāya sattā iddhā vuddhā ukkaṃsagatā hontīti iminā vā pariyāyena iddhīti saṅkhaṃ gatānaṃ abhiññācittasampayuttānaṃ chandasamādhipadhānasaṅkhārānaṃ adhiṭṭhānaṭṭhena pādabhūtaṃ sesacittacetasikarāsinti attho. Vuttañhetaṃ "iddhipādoti tathābhūtassa vedanākkhandho…pe… viññāṇakkhandho"ti (vibha. 434).
Atha vā pajjate anenāti pādo. Pāpuṇīyatīti attho. Iddhiyā pādo iddhipādo. Chandādīnametaṃ adhivacanaṃ. Yathāha – "chandañce, bhikkhave, bhikkhu nissāya labhati samādhiṃ, labhati cittassekaggataṃ, ayaṃ vuccati chandasamādhi. So anuppannānaṃ pāpakānaṃ…pe… padahati, ime vuccanti padhānasaṅkhārā. Iti ayañca chando ayañca chandasamādhi ime ca padhānasaṅkhārā, ayaṃ vuccati, bhikkhave, chandasamādhipadhānasaṅkhārasamannāgato iddhipādo"ti (saṃ. ni. 5.825). Evaṃ sesiddhipādesupi attho veditabbo.
"The four bases" should be understood as the four bases of power. For this was said: "what are the four bases of power? Here, a monk develops the base of power endowed with concentration due to desire and volitional formations of striving. He develops the base of power endowed with concentration due to energy … due to mind … due to investigation and volitional formations of striving. These four bases of power lead to the obtaining of power … to confidence in power" (Paṭis. iii.9). And here, "concentration due to desire" is concentration whose cause is desire, or in which desire predominates — a designation for the concentration obtained by making the desire to act one's predominant factor. "Volitional formations of striving" are formations of a striving nature — a designation for the right effort of striving that accomplishes the four functions. "Endowed with" means possessed of both concentration due to desire and the volitional formations of striving. "Base of power": whether by the manner of speaking that emphasizes accomplishment, or by the manner that emphasizes succeeding — "by this, beings succeed, become powerful, prosperous, arrived at excellence" — the meaning, by either manner, is: the remaining mass of mind and mental factors, associated with the direct-knowledge consciousness reckoned as "power," is their "base," in the sense of being the foundation for the concentration due to desire and the volitional formations of striving. For this was said: "'base of power' means, for one in that state, the aggregate of feeling … the aggregate of consciousness" (Vibh. 434).
Or alternatively: "that by which one advances" is a "base" — the meaning is, "that by which one arrives." The base of power is "the base of power" — a designation for desire and the rest. As it is said: "monks, if a monk, in dependence on desire, obtains concentration, obtains one-pointedness of mind, this is called 'concentration due to desire.' He strives ... for the sake of the non-arising of unarisen evil states ... these are called 'volitional formations of striving.' Thus this desire, this concentration due to desire, and these volitional formations of striving — this, monks, is called 'the base of power endowed with concentration due to desire and volitional formations of striving'" (S.N. 5.825). The meaning for the remaining bases of power should be understood in the same way.
The careful distinction between "desire" (chanda) itself and "concentration due to desire" (chandasamādhi) is worth not glossing over: desire alone is not concentration, and concentration alone is not desire — the base of power requires the specific concentration that arises when desire has been made the predominant, organizing factor behind it, a subtly different thing from either desire or concentration considered separately.
The four bases quietly cover the full range of human motivational styles: someone driven primarily by wanting something (desire), by sheer effort and persistence (energy), by focused attention itself (mind), or by analytical curiosity (investigation) can each reach the very same destination, provided that whichever quality dominates is genuinely paired with the same fourfold striving. The path to supernormal power, in other words, does not require any single personality type — only that whatever naturally drives a given individual be properly harnessed.
a base of supernormal power — iddhi (power) + pāda (foot, base); one of four canonical factors (desire, energy, mind, investigation) that, paired with striving, produce the concentration from which power arises — a well-known category appearing throughout the broader Pāli canon, not unique to this treatise.
volitional formations of striving — padhāna (striving, exertion) + saṅkhāra (formation, activity); a designation for the four right efforts (preventing, abandoning, developing, and maintaining) considered specifically as they pair with each of the four bases of power.
investigation, examination — the fourth of the four possible predominant factors, describing a mind driven by analytical inquiry into the nature of things rather than by desire, energy, or focused attention alone.
The Eight Footings: Why Desire Is Never Concentration, Even Though It Produces It
The third framework simply doubles the four bases into eight footings by insisting, for each one in turn, on a precise and easily blurred distinction: desire is not concentration, and concentration is not desire, even though desire, properly relied upon, genuinely produces concentration. The same careful separation is repeated for energy, mind, and investigation. The point is not pedantry for its own sake — it establishes that each of the four qualities functions as a distinct cause working together with, rather than being identical to, the concentration that actually leads to power.
Aṭṭha padānīti chandādīni aṭṭha veditabbāni. Vuttañhetaṃ "iddhiyā katamāni aṭṭha padāni? Chandañce bhikkhu nissāya labhati samādhiṃ, labhati cittassekaggataṃ. Chando na samādhi, samādhi na chando. Añño chando, añño samādhi. Vīriyañce bhikkhu… cittañce bhikkhu… vīmaṃsañce bhikkhu nissāya labhati samādhiṃ, labhati cittassekaggataṃ. Vīmaṃsā na samādhi, samādhi na vīmaṃsā. Aññā vīmaṃsā, añño samādhi. Iddhiyā imāni aṭṭha padāni iddhilābhāya…pe… iddhivesārajjāya saṃvattantī"ti (paṭi. ma. 3.9). Ettha hi iddhimuppādetukāmatāchando samādhinā ekato niyuttova iddhilābhāya saṃvattati; tathā vīriyādayo. Tasmā imāni aṭṭha padāni vuttānīti veditabbāni.
"The eight footings" should be understood as desire and the rest, eight in number. For this was said: "what are the eight footings of power? If a monk, in dependence on desire, obtains concentration, obtains one-pointedness of mind — desire is not concentration, concentration is not desire; desire is one thing, concentration another. If a monk, in dependence on energy ... in dependence on mind ... if a monk, in dependence on investigation, obtains concentration, obtains one-pointedness of mind — investigation is not concentration, concentration is not investigation; investigation is one thing, concentration another. These eight footings of power lead to the obtaining of power ... to confidence in power" (Paṭis. iii.9). For here, the desire to produce power, conjoined together with concentration, leads to the obtaining of power; likewise energy and the rest. Therefore these eight footings should be understood as stated.
The insistence that "desire is one thing, concentration another" prevents a subtle but real conceptual error: it would be easy to assume that sufficiently strong desire simply is concentration, or that concentration is nothing more than desire intensified to a fine point. The text instead treats them as two genuinely distinct phenomena that happen to arise together and function jointly — desire causing concentration to arise without ever becoming concentration itself, exactly as a spark causes a fire without being the fire.
Counting the same four qualities twice — once as "bases" paired with striving, once as "footings" paired with, and distinguished from, concentration — reflects two different analytical purposes rather than genuine redundancy: the bases frame desire and the rest as productive causes of a compound state, while the footings frame them as components requiring careful conceptual separation from the state they help produce.
a footing, a step, a word — here used in its sense of a foundational element or component, the eight "footings" being desire, energy, mind, and investigation, each paired with and distinguished from concentration.
one-pointedness of mind — citta (mind) + ekaggatā (one-pointed state); the technical name for concentration itself in this context, the state that desire, energy, mind, or investigation each independently gives rise to without becoming identical to it.
the wish to produce power — iddhi (power) + uppādetu-kāmatā (the desire to produce); the specific form desire takes when functioning as a footing of power, distinguishing it from ordinary sensual or worldly desire.
Sixteen Roots of an Unshakeable Mind
The fourth and final framework, the sixteen roots, catalogues every specific way a mind can be described as genuinely "imperturbable" — ten roots describing a mind free from various structural distortions (not bent down into laziness, not bent up into restlessness, not inclined toward lust, not inclined away into ill will, unattached to views, unbound by desire, liberated from sensual lust, disjoined from the defilements, past the boundary of the defilements, and arrived at unity beyond their manifold variety), and six further roots describing a mind actively guarded by the same six qualities named earlier in the chapter's discussion of the eight-factored fitness for direct knowledge — faith, energy, mindfulness, concentration, wisdom, and luminosity, each specifically shielding against its own particular opposite. The chapter closes this long structural analysis by explaining why the same underlying content appears twice, once in the canonical sutta formula and once here in the Paṭisambhidāmagga's own more detailed breakdown: repetition here serves clarity, not redundancy.
Soḷasa mūlānīti soḷasahi ākārehi āneñjatā cittassa veditabbā. Vuttañhetaṃ – "iddhiyā kati mūlāni? Soḷasa mūlāni – anonataṃ cittaṃ kosajje na iñjatīti āneñjaṃ, anunnataṃ cittaṃ uddhacce na iñjatīti āneñjaṃ, anabhinataṃ cittaṃ rāge na iñjatīti āneñjaṃ, anapanataṃ cittaṃ byāpāde na iñjatīti āneñjaṃ, anissitaṃ cittaṃ diṭṭhiyā na iñjatīti āneñjaṃ, appaṭibaddhaṃ cittaṃ chandarāge na iñjatīti āneñjaṃ, vippamuttaṃ cittaṃ kāmarāge na iñjatīti āneñjaṃ, visaṃyuttaṃ cittaṃ kilese na iñjatīti āneñjaṃ, vimariyādikataṃ cittaṃ kilesamariyāde na iñjatīti āneñjaṃ, ekattagataṃ cittaṃ nānattakilese na iñjatīti āneñjaṃ, saddhāya pariggahitaṃ cittaṃ assaddhiye na iñjatīti āneñjaṃ, vīriyena pariggahitaṃ cittaṃ kosajje na iñjatīti āneñjaṃ, satiyā pariggahitaṃ cittaṃ pamāde na iñjatīti āneñjaṃ, samādhinā pariggahitaṃ cittaṃ uddhacce na iñjatīti āneñjaṃ, paññāya pariggahitaṃ cittaṃ avijjāya na iñjatīti āneñjaṃ, obhāsagataṃ cittaṃ avijjandhakāre na iñjatīti āneñjaṃ. Iddhiyā imāni soḷasa mūlāni iddhilābhāya…pe… iddhivesārajjāya saṃvattantī"ti (paṭi. ma. 3.9).
Kāmañca esa attho evaṃ samāhite cittetiādināpi siddhoyeva, paṭhamajjhānādīnaṃ pana iddhiyā bhūmipādapadamūlabhāvadassanatthaṃ puna vutto. Purimo ca suttesu āgatanayo. Ayaṃ paṭisambhidāyaṃ. Iti ubhayattha asammohatthampi puna vutto.
"The sixteen roots": the imperturbability of mind should be understood by sixteen aspects. For this was said: "how many roots does power have? Sixteen roots. A mind not bent down does not shake with laziness — this is imperturbability. A mind not bent up does not shake with restlessness — this is imperturbability. A mind not inclined toward does not shake with lust — this is imperturbability. A mind not inclined away does not shake with ill will — this is imperturbability. An unattached mind does not shake with wrong view — this is imperturbability. An unbound mind does not shake with desire and lust — this is imperturbability. A liberated mind does not shake with sensual lust — this is imperturbability. A disjoined mind does not shake with the defilements — this is imperturbability. A mind that has removed its own boundary does not shake at the boundary of the defilements — this is imperturbability. A mind that has arrived at unity does not shake with the manifold defilements — this is imperturbability. A mind grasped by faith does not shake with faithlessness — this is imperturbability. A mind grasped by energy does not shake with laziness — this is imperturbability. A mind grasped by mindfulness does not shake with negligence — this is imperturbability. A mind grasped by concentration does not shake with restlessness — this is imperturbability. A mind grasped by wisdom does not shake with ignorance — this is imperturbability. A mind that has gone to luminosity does not shake with the darkness of ignorance — this is imperturbability. These sixteen roots of power lead to the obtaining of power ... to confidence in power" (Paṭis. iii.9).
Admittedly, this same meaning is already established by the passage beginning, "with mind thus concentrated," and so on; but it is stated again here in order to show that the first jhāna and the rest are the grounds, bases, footings, and roots of power. The former is the method that has come down in the suttas; this present one is that of the Paṭisambhidāmagga. Thus it is stated again in both places for the sake of freedom from confusion.
The first ten roots and the last six roots operate by two distinct logics worth separating clearly: the first ten describe a mind whose own internal structure has been corrected — no longer bent, inclined, attached, bound, or fragmented by defilement in any of ten specific ways — while the last six describe a mind actively defended from outside, held fast by six positive qualities each standing guard against one specific corrupting counterpart. Structural correction and active defense together, not either alone, constitute genuine imperturbability.
The chapter's own explanation for repeating this same eight-quality content here as "roots," having already given it earlier as the eight-factor description of a mind fit for direct knowledge, is a small but genuinely useful piece of intellectual honesty: rather than pretending the overlap is accidental or hoping the reader won't notice, the text names the two different sources (the suttas and the Paṭisambhidāmagga) explicitly and states that the repetition exists purely to prevent confusion about how the terminology maps across both traditions.
imperturbability, unshakeability — a- (not) + iñjati (to shake, waver); the single quality all sixteen roots are said to establish, each one naming a specific way the mind becomes immune to a particular corrupting influence.
having removed its own boundary — vi- (away) + mariyādā (a boundary, limit) + kata (made); one of the ten structural roots, describing a mind that has dissolved the very boundary-line the defilements would otherwise use to demarcate their own territory.
arrived at unity — eka (one) + atta (state, nature) + gata (arrived, gone); describing a mind that has moved beyond the fragmenting multiplicity of the various defilements into a single, unified condition no longer susceptible to their variety.
The Actual Mechanics: Preliminary Work, Re-Entry, Then a Single Determining Moment
With all four supporting frameworks now explained, the chapter finally describes the precise sequence of mental events that actually produces multiplication. Having emerged from the basis-jhāna, the meditator performs preliminary work — simply repeating, "may I become a hundred" — then re-enters that same jhāna, emerges once more, and determines it; and it is at the very moment of that determining-consciousness, not before, that he genuinely becomes a hundred. If this does not succeed at first, the whole cycle may be repeated once or twice more. The three consciousnesses involved each take a different object: the basic jhāna-consciousness rests on the kasiṇa-sign as always, but the preliminary-work and determining consciousnesses both take the actual desired number — a hundred, a thousand — as their object, and take it as a genuine visible form, never as a mere abstract concept.
Ñāṇena adhiṭṭhahantoti svāyamete iddhiyā bhūmipādapadabhūte dhamme sampādetvā abhiññāpādakaṃ jhānaṃ samāpajjitvā vuṭṭhāya sace sataṃ icchati "sataṃ homi sataṃ homī"ti parikammaṃ katvā puna abhiññāpādakaṃ jhānaṃ samāpajjitvā vuṭṭhāya adhiṭṭhāti, adhiṭṭhānacittena saheva sataṃ hoti. Sahassādīsupi eseva nayo. Sace evaṃ na ijjhati puna parikammaṃ katvā dutiyampi samāpajjitvā vuṭṭhāya adhiṭṭhātabbaṃ. Saṃyuttaṭṭhakathāyaṃ hi ekavāraṃ dvevāraṃ samāpajjituṃ vaṭṭatīti vuttaṃ. Tattha pādakajjhānacittaṃ nimittārammaṇaṃ. Parikammacittāni satārammaṇāni vā sahassārammaṇāni vā, tāni ca kho vaṇṇavasena, no paṇṇattivasena. Adhiṭṭhānacittampi tatheva satārammaṇaṃ vā sahassārammaṇaṃ vā. Taṃ pubbe vuttaṃ appanācittamiva gotrabhuanantaraṃ ekameva uppajjati rūpāvacaracatutthajjhānikaṃ.
"Determining by knowledge": this monk, having accomplished these states constituting the grounds, bases, and footings of power, having entered the jhāna that serves as the basis for direct knowledge and emerged from it, if he wishes to become a hundred, performs the preliminary work, "may I become a hundred, may I become a hundred" — and then, having entered that same basis-jhāna once more and emerged from it, he determines it; and together with that very determining-consciousness, he becomes a hundred. The same method applies for a thousand and so on. If it does not succeed in this way, the preliminary work should be performed again, and he should enter a second time, emerge, and then determine it. For it is said in the Saṃyutta commentary that it is proper to enter once or twice more if needed. Herein, the basic jhāna-consciousness has the sign as its object. The preliminary-work consciousnesses have either a hundred or a thousand as their object — and this by way of actual visible form, not by way of mere abstract concept. The determining-consciousness likewise has either a hundred or a thousand as its object in just the same way. That determining-consciousness, like the absorption-consciousness already described, arises as a single moment immediately following the change-of-lineage consciousness, belonging to the fine-material fourth jhāna.
The specification that the desired multitude is taken "by way of visible form, not by way of mere concept" is a precise and important technical point: the meditator is not merely thinking abstractly about the number a hundred, the way one might silently count, but genuinely holding a hundred actual, visible copies of himself as the direct object of consciousness — the multiplication is a perceptual and meditative event, not an act of arithmetic imagination.
The permission to repeat the whole cycle "once or twice more" if the first attempt does not succeed is a small but humanizing detail in an otherwise highly technical description: even at this most advanced stage of the entire treatise's meditative program, failure on a first attempt is treated as entirely ordinary and expected, warranting simple repetition rather than any deeper crisis of practice.
preliminary work — the specific mental repetition ("may I become a hundred") performed after emerging from the basis-jhāna but before the actual determining act that produces the multiplication.
by way of actual form / by way of concept — vaṇṇa (color, visible appearance) versus paṇṇatti (a designation, concept); the crucial distinction marking the desired multitude as a genuinely perceived object, not an abstractly conceived number.
change-of-lineage (consciousness) — gotra (lineage, family) + bhū (become); the pivotal moment of consciousness immediately preceding an absorption, here shown to precede the determining-consciousness in exactly the same structural position.
Cūḷapanthaka, Part One: A Cloth That Would Not Stay Clean
The Paṭisambhidāmagga's formula for becoming many names a specific witness — Venerable Cūḷapanthaka — and the chapter now tells his story in full. Younger brother to an already-arahant elder, Cūḷapanthaka proved unable to memorize even a single verse in four months, and was expelled from the monastery by his own frustrated brother as simply incapable of the teaching. The Buddha found him weeping at the gate, took him by the arm, and gave him something far simpler than verse memorization: a plain piece of cloth to hold and wipe while repeating, "a cloth for wiping, a cloth for wiping." As his hands dirtied the once-clean cloth, Cūḷapanthaka suddenly grasped, on his own, that the fault lay not in the cloth but in his own embodied existence — and from that single, humble insight, developed all the way to full arahantship, complete with every discriminating knowledge and every direct knowledge, in a single sitting.
Yaṃ pana vuttaṃ "yathā āyasmā cūḷapanthako"ti, taṃ bahudhābhāvassa kāyasakkhidassanatthaṃ vuttaṃ. Taṃ pana vatthunā dīpetabbaṃ. Te kira dvebhātaro panthe jātattā panthakāti nāmaṃ labhiṃsu. Tesaṃ jeṭṭho mahāpanthako, so pabbajitvā saha paṭisambhidāhi arahattaṃ pāpuṇi. Arahā hutvā cūḷapanthakaṃ pabbājetvā —
Padumaṃ yathā kokanadaṃ sugandhaṃ, pāto siyā phullamavītagandhaṃ;
Aṅgīrasaṃ passa virocamānaṃ, tapantamādiccamivantalikkheti. (a. ni. 5.195)
Imaṃ gāthaṃ adāsi. So taṃ catūhi māsehi paguṇaṃ kātuṃ nāsakkhi. Atha naṃ thero abhabbo tvaṃ sāsaneti vihārato nīhari. Tasmiñca kāle thero bhattuddesako hoti. Jīvako theraṃ upasaṅkamitvā "sve, bhante, bhagavatā saddhiṃ pañcabhikkhusatāni gahetvā amhākaṃ gehe bhikkhaṃ gaṇhathā"ti āha. Theropi ṭhapetvā cūḷapanthakaṃ sesānaṃ adhivāsemīti adhivāsesi.
Cūḷapanthako dvārakoṭṭhake ṭhatvā rodati. Bhagavā dibbacakkhunā disvā taṃ upasaṅkamitvā kasmā rodasīti āha. So taṃ pavattimācikkhi. Bhagavā na sajjhāyaṃ kātuṃ asakkonto mama sāsane abhabbo nāma hoti, mā soci bhikkhūti taṃ bāhāyaṃ gahetvā vihāraṃ pavisitvā iddhiyā pilotikakhaṇḍaṃ abhinimminitvā adāsi, handa bhikkhu imaṃ parimajjanto rajoharaṇaṃ rajoharaṇanti punappunaṃ sajjhāyaṃ karohīti.
Tassa tathā karoto taṃ kāḷavaṇṇaṃ ahosi. So parisuddhaṃ vatthaṃ, natthettha doso, attabhāvassa panāyaṃ dosoti saññaṃ paṭilabhitvā pañcasu khandhesu ñāṇaṃ otāretvā vipassanaṃ vaḍḍhetvā anulomato gotrabhusamīpaṃ pāpesi. Athassa bhagavā obhāsagāthā abhāsi —
"Rāgo rajo na ca pana reṇu vuccati,
Rāgassetaṃ adhivacanaṃ rajoti;
Etaṃ rajaṃ vippajahitvā paṇḍitā,
Viharanti te vigatarajassa sāsane.
"Doso…pe….
"Moho rajo na ca pana reṇu vuccati,
Mohassetaṃ adhivacanaṃ rajoti;
Etaṃ rajaṃ vippajahitvā paṇḍitā,
Viharanti te vigatarajassa sāsane"ti. (mahāni. 209)
Tassa gāthāpariyosāne catupaṭisambhidāchaḷabhiññāparivārā nava lokuttaradhammā hatthagatāva ahesuṃ.
As for what was said, "just as Venerable Cūḷapanthaka did" — this was said in order to point to a living witness to the state of becoming manifold. This should be illustrated by the story itself. It is told that two brothers, having been born on a road, received the name "Panthaka" [Road-born]. The elder of the two, Mahāpanthaka, went forth and attained arahantship together with the discriminating knowledges. Having become an arahant, he had Cūḷapanthaka ordained as well, and gave him this verse —
"Just as a fragrant red lotus might be in bloom at dawn, its scent undiminished — behold the Radiant One, shining forth, blazing like the sun in the sky." (A.N. 5.195)
He was unable to master this verse even in four months. Then the elder, thinking, "you are incapable in this teaching," expelled him from the monastery. At that time, the elder happened also to be the one responsible for assigning meal invitations. Jīvaka, approaching the elder, said, "Venerable sir, tomorrow, please bring the Blessed One together with five hundred monks to receive alms at our house." The elder, thinking, "I accept on behalf of everyone except Cūḷapanthaka," accepted accordingly.
Cūḷapanthaka stood at the monastery gateway, weeping. The Blessed One, seeing him with the divine eye, approached him and said, "Why are you weeping?" He related what had happened. The Blessed One said, "One who is unable to master a recitation is not, on that account, incapable in my teaching — do not grieve, monk" — and, taking him by the arm, brought him into the monastery, and, by supernormal power, created a piece of cloth and gave it to him, saying, "Come now, monk — wiping this, recite again and again, 'a cloth for wiping, a cloth for wiping.'"
As he did so, the cloth turned black. He gained the perception, "this cloth was pure — there is no fault in it; rather, this is the fault of my own embodied existence" — and, bringing his knowledge down onto the five aggregates, developing insight, he brought it, advancing steadily, right up to the threshold of the change-of-lineage moment. Then the Blessed One spoke to him these verses of radiant light —
"Lust is called 'dust' — yet it is not the dust of the ground; this is a name given to lust itself, 'dust.' Having abandoned this dust, the wise dwell in the teaching of one free of dust.
"Hatred ... [likewise] ....
"Delusion is called 'dust' — yet it is not the dust of the ground; this is a name given to delusion itself, 'dust.' Having abandoned this dust, the wise dwell in the teaching of one free of dust." (Mahāniddesa 209)
At the conclusion of that verse, the nine supramundane states, together with the four discriminating knowledges and the six direct knowledges, came, as it were, right into his hand.
The Buddha's diagnosis — "one who is unable to master a recitation is not, on that account, incapable in my teaching" — quietly separates two things this story could easily have conflated: verbal memorization and genuine spiritual capacity. Cūḷapanthaka's failure was specific to one particular skill, not a verdict on his fitness for liberation, and the entire remainder of the story exists to demonstrate that a method matched to his actual capacity — a simple physical repetition rather than abstract verse — could reach exactly the same destination his brother's more conventional training had already reached.
The wordplay running through the cloth exercise and the closing verses is worth making explicit: "rajo" means both ordinary physical dust and, by extension, mental defilement. Cūḷapanthaka's concrete observation of dirt genuinely accumulating on cloth becomes, through the Buddha's verses, the exact vehicle for understanding an entirely abstract truth about lust, hatred, and delusion as "dust" of a different kind — a method perfectly calibrated to a mind that had struggled with pure verbal abstraction from the outset.
a cloth for wiping dust — rajas (dust) + haraṇa (removing); the plain physical object and its recitation-phrase the Buddha substitutes for conventional verse memorization, turning a concrete chore into the vehicle for full liberation.
change-of-lineage — the pivotal moment of consciousness marking the transition from the ordinary worldling's mental continuum to the supramundane path, which Cūḷapanthaka's insight practice is here said to have "brought steadily" right up to.
the four discriminating knowledges / the six direct knowledges — the complete set of advanced attainments Cūḷapanthaka received all at once, "as if they came right into his hand," at the very moment of his full awakening.
Cūḷapanthaka, Part Two: A Thousand Identical Monks, and How to Become One Again
The very next day, now a fully accomplished arahant, Cūḷapanthaka demonstrated his new power on a grand scale: while the Buddha withheld his own alms bowl at Jīvaka's house, waiting for the one remaining monk still back at the monastery, Cūḷapanthaka multiplied himself a thousand times over in a nearby mango grove, so that the messenger sent to fetch him found an entire monastery blazing with identical saffron robes and could not tell which figure was the real one — until, following the Buddha's own instruction, he simply grabbed the hem of whichever robe he reached first, at which every duplicate vanished at once. The chapter closes this story with the precise technical mechanics behind it: created duplicates are, by default, exact and unindividuated copies of the original, doing whatever he does and nothing else, unless the meditator deliberately wills variety into them — different ages, different hairstyles, different tasks — and the same basic procedure of preliminary work, re-entry, and determination that produced the multitude also, in reverse, collapses it back into one.
Satthā dutiyadivase jīvakassa gehaṃ agamāsi saddhiṃ bhikkhusaṅghena. Atha dakkhiṇodakāvasāne yāguyā diyyamānāya hatthena pattaṃ pidahi. Jīvako kiṃ bhanteti pucchi. Vihāre eko bhikkhu atthīti. So purisaṃ pesesi "gaccha, ayyaṃ gahetvā sīghaṃ ehī"ti. Vihārato nikkhante pana bhagavati,
Sahassakkhattumattānaṃ, nimminitvāna panthako;
Nisīdambavane ramme, yāva kālappavedanāti. (theragā. 563)
Atha so puriso gantvā kāsāvehi ekapajjotaṃ ārāmaṃ disvā āgantvā bhikkhūhi bharito bhante ārāmo, nāhaṃ jānāmi katamo so ayyoti āha. Tato naṃ bhagavā āha "gaccha yaṃ paṭhamaṃ passasi, taṃ cīvarakaṇṇe gahetvā 'satthā taṃ āmantetī'ti vatvā ānehī"ti. So taṃ gantvā therasseva cīvarakaṇṇe aggahesi. Tāvadeva sabbepi nimmitā antaradhāyiṃsu. Thero "gaccha tva"nti taṃ uyyojetvā mukhadhovanādisarīrakiccaṃ niṭṭhapetvā paṭhamataraṃ gantvā pattāsane nisīdi. Idaṃ sandhāya vuttaṃ "yathā āyasmā cūḷapanthako"ti.
Tatra ye te bahū nimmitā te aniyametvā nimmitattā iddhimatā sadisāva honti. Ṭhānanisajjādīsu vā bhāsitatuṇhībhāvādīsu vā yaṃ yaṃ iddhimā karoti, taṃ tadeva karonti. Sace pana nānāvaṇṇe kātukāmo hoti, keci paṭhamavaye, keci majjhimavaye, keci pacchimavaye, tathā dīghakese, upaḍḍhamuṇḍe, muṇḍe, missakese, upaḍḍharattacīvare, paṇḍukacīvare, padabhāṇadhammakathāsarabhaññapañhapucchanapañhavissajjanarajanapacanacīvarasibbanadhovanādīni karonte aparepi vā nānappakārake kātukāmo hoti, tena pādakajjhānato vuṭṭhāya ettakā bhikkhū paṭhamavayā hontūtiādinā nayena parikammaṃ katvā puna samāpajjitvā vuṭṭhāya adhiṭṭhātabbaṃ. Adhiṭṭhānacittena saddhiṃ icchiticchitappakārāyeva hontīti. Esa nayo bahudhāpi hutvā eko hotītiādīsu.
Ayaṃ pana viseso, iminā bhikkhunā evaṃ bahubhāvaṃ nimminitvā puna "ekova hutvā caṅkamissāmi, sajjhāyaṃ karissāmi, pañhaṃ pucchissāmī"ti cintetvā vā, "ayaṃ vihāro appabhikkhuko, sace keci āgamissanti 'kuto ime ettakā ekasadisā bhikkhū, addhā therassa esa ānubhāvo'ti maṃ jānissantī"ti appicchatāya vā antarāva "eko homī"ti icchantena pādakajjhānaṃ samāpajjitvā vuṭṭhāya "eko homī"ti parikammaṃ katvā puna samāpajjitvā vuṭṭhāya "eko homī"ti adhiṭṭhātabbaṃ. Adhiṭṭhānacittena saddhiṃyeva eko hoti. Evaṃ akaronto pana yathā paricchinnakālavasena sayameva eko hoti.
The next day, the Teacher went to Jīvaka's house together with the community of monks. Then, at the conclusion of the water-offering, when the rice-gruel was being served, he covered his bowl with his hand. Jīvaka asked, "What is it, venerable sir?" "There is a monk still at the monastery." He sent a man, saying, "Go, fetch the venerable one, and come back quickly." But by the time the Blessed One had left the monastery —
Having multiplied himself a thousand times over, Panthaka sat in the delightful mango grove, until the time should be announced. (Theragāthā 563)
Then that man went, and, seeing the monastery ablaze with a single glow of saffron robes, came back and said, "Venerable sir, the monastery is filled with monks — I do not know which one is that venerable one." Then the Blessed One said to him, "Go, and whomever you see first, take hold of the hem of his robe, saying, 'the Teacher summons you,' and bring him." He went and took hold of that very elder's own robe-hem. At that very instant, all the created forms vanished at once. The elder, dismissing him with, "you go on ahead," finished his bodily duties such as washing his face, and, arriving there even earlier than the messenger, sat down in the seat already assigned with his bowl. It is with reference to this that it was said, "just as Venerable Cūḷapanthaka did."
Herein, since these numerous created forms are created without any individual specification, they are simply identical in appearance to the one who possesses the power. Whatever posture — standing, sitting, and the like — or whatever activity — speaking, remaining silent, and the like — the one possessing the power performs, they perform that very same thing. But if he wishes to make them of various kinds — some in the first stage of life, some in middle age, some in old age; likewise some long-haired, some half-shaven, some fully shaven, some with mixed hair; some in half-red robes, some in yellow-brown robes; some reciting verses, giving Dhamma talks, chanting, asking questions, answering questions, dyeing robes, cooking, sewing robes, washing them, and the like; or wishing to make them various in yet other ways — then, emerging from the basis-jhāna, he should perform the preliminary work by the method, "may this many monks be in the first stage of life," and so on, and then, having entered the jhāna again and emerged, he should determine it. Together with the determining-consciousness, they become exactly of whatever specific kind was wished for. The same method applies also to "having been many, he becomes one," and so on.
But here is a distinctive point: this monk, having thus created a state of manifoldness, and then, either thinking, "I shall become just one and walk about, recite, or ask a question," or, out of a desire for few wants, thinking, "this monastery has few monks; if anyone comes, they will surely wonder, 'where did all these identical monks come from — surely this is that elder's own power,' and will come to know me [by reputation]" — and so, in the meantime, wishing, "may I become one," he should, emerging from the basis-jhāna, perform the preliminary work, "may I become one," and then, having entered again and emerged, determine, "may I become one." Together with the determining-consciousness, he becomes just one. But if he does not do this, then, simply according to the previously fixed time-limit, he becomes one by himself, on his own.
The default identity of created duplicates — indistinguishable copies that do exactly what the original does, in perfect unison — is a technical detail that repays attention: it means the baseline power of multiplication is, in a sense, the easier case, since deliberate variety (different ages, hairstyles, activities) requires an additional, separate act of preliminary work and determination layered on top of the basic multiplication itself. Sameness is the default; difference must be specifically willed.
Cūḷapanthaka's own motive for wanting to return to being one — a modest, almost bureaucratic concern about drawing unwanted attention to his teacher's reputation rather than his own — is a quietly telling character note appended to what could otherwise read as a purely technical passage: even at the peak of demonstrating a spectacular new power, the story's final beat is about restraint and humility, not display.
a created form, a duplicate — nis- + mā- (to fashion, construct); the standard term for each of the multiplied copies produced through the power of resolve, whether identical or deliberately varied.
desire for few wants, contentment with little — appa (little) + icchā (desire); the specific motivation attributed to Cūḷapanthaka for returning to being a single monk, avoiding the attention his spectacular display might otherwise draw.
a previously fixed time-limit — pariccheda (a determination, boundary) + kāla (time); the alternative, passive way multiplication ends on its own, without any deliberate act of "becoming one" — simply because a duration was set in advance.
Becoming Visible: Splitting Open the Earth Between Two Cities
Having finished with the power of resolve's multiplication feats, the chapter turns to two related marvels: making something visible, and making it invisible. Becoming visible means turning darkness into light, the covered into the open, or the out-of-range into what lies within range — and its first-ever performer, characteristically, was the Buddha himself. Invited to the distant city of Sāketa by the laywoman Cūḷasubhaddā, he arranged for the entire journey there in five hundred created pavilions so that the people of Sāketa and Sāvatthī, seven leagues apart, could see each other directly — and, arriving in the city, he split the earth open down to the Avīci hell and parted the sky up to the Brahmā-world, making the full extent of the cosmos itself visible to the assembled crowd.
Āvibhāvaṃ tirobhāvanti ettha āvibhāvaṃ karoti tirobhāvaṃ karotīti ayamattho. Idameva hi sandhāya paṭisambhidāyaṃ vuttaṃ "āvibhāvanti kenaci anāvaṭaṃ hoti appaṭicchannaṃ vivaṭaṃ pākaṭaṃ. Tirobhāvanti kenaci āvaṭaṃ hoti paṭicchannaṃ pihitaṃ paṭikujjita"nti (paṭi. ma. 3.11). Tatrāyaṃ iddhimā āvibhāvaṃ kātukāmo andhakāraṃ vā ālokaṃ karoti, paṭicchannaṃ vā vivaṭaṃ, anāpāthaṃ vā āpāthaṃ karoti. Kathaṃ? Ayañhi yathā paṭicchannopi dūre ṭhitopi vā dissati, evaṃ attānaṃ vā paraṃ vā kātukāmo pādakajjhānato vuṭṭhāya idaṃ andhakāraṭṭhānaṃ ālokajātaṃ hotūti vā, idaṃ paṭicchannaṃ vivaṭaṃ hotūti vā, idaṃ anāpāthaṃ āpāthaṃ hotūti vā āvajjitvā parikammaṃ katvā vuttanayeneva adhiṭṭhāti, saha adhiṭṭhānacittena yathādhiṭṭhitameva hoti. Pare dūre ṭhitāpi passanti. Sayampi passitukāmo passati.
Etaṃ pana pāṭihāriyaṃ kena katapubbanti? Bhagavatā. Bhagavā hi cūḷasubhaddāya nimantito vissakammunā nimmitehi pañcahi kūṭāgārasatehi sāvatthito sattayojanabbhantaraṃ sāketaṃ gacchanto yathā sāketanagaravāsino sāvatthivāsike, sāvatthivāsino ca sāketavāsike passanti, evaṃ adhiṭṭhāsi. Nagaramajjhe ca otaritvā pathaviṃ dvidhā bhinditvā yāva avīciṃ ākāsañca dvidhā viyūhitvā yāva brahmalokaṃ dassesi.
"Becoming visible, becoming invisible": herein, "he makes visible, he makes invisible" is the meaning. For it is with reference to precisely this that it was said in the Paṭisambhidāmagga: "'becoming visible' means becoming unobstructed by anything, uncovered, open, evident. 'Becoming invisible' means becoming obstructed by something, covered, shut, closed off" (Paṭis. iii.11). Herein, this possessor of power, wishing to make something visible, makes darkness into light, or the covered into the open, or the out-of-range into what lies within range. How? Just as something covered, or even something standing far away, can thereby be seen — so, wishing to make either himself or another visible, emerging from the basis-jhāna, he adverts: "let this dark place become bright," or "let this covered thing become open," or "let this out-of-range thing come within range" — and, having performed the preliminary work, determines it by the method already stated; and, together with the determining-consciousness, it becomes exactly as determined. Others, even standing far away, see it. He himself too, wishing to see, sees.
But by whom was this marvel first performed? By the Blessed One. For the Blessed One, invited by Cūḷasubhaddā, going from Sāvatthī to Sāketa, seven leagues distant, in five hundred gabled pavilions created by Vissakamma, determined it so that the inhabitants of the city of Sāketa could see the inhabitants of Sāvatthī, and the inhabitants of Sāvatthī could see the inhabitants of Sāketa. And, descending into the middle of the city, having split the earth in two down as far as the Avīci hell, and parted the sky in two up as far as the Brahmā-world, he showed these to the assembly.
The three paired opposites defining visibility — darkness and light, covered and open, out-of-range and within range — cover three genuinely distinct ways something can fail to be seen: an absence of illumination, a physical obstruction, and simple distance. The power of becoming visible addresses all three by the same underlying mechanism, showing that what looks like three different problems from an ordinary observer's standpoint is, for this power, a single unified operation.
The Sāketa episode's earth-splitting and sky-parting go well beyond the narrower definition just given — this is not merely removing an obstruction to sight but making visible things that were never meant to be seen at all under ordinary conditions, the very floor of hell and the furthest reach of the Brahmā-world. The Buddha's own use of the power, characteristically, exceeds the baseline case it is used to illustrate.
becoming visible / becoming invisible — āvi- (openly, manifestly) + bhāva (state) versus tiras- (across, hidden) + bhāva (state); the paired eleventh and twelfth marvels this and the next several sections treat, both variants of the power of resolve.
the divine architect — the celestial craftsman-deity traditionally credited with constructing marvelous structures on request, here responsible for the five hundred pavilions used on the journey to Sāketa.
the lowest and most severe of the hell realms — a- (without) + vīci (interval, respite); named here as the literal floor the Buddha split the earth open to reveal, the extreme lower boundary of the cosmos he made visible.
Three Months Teaching the Gods, and a Journey Bored Straight Through a Mountain
A second, even more elaborate demonstration of the same power unfolds around the Buddha's famous sojourn among the gods. After performing the twin marvel and freeing eighty-four thousand beings from bondage, the Buddha climbed, in two strides, from the earth's surface to the summit of Mount Sineru itself, and spent three uninterrupted months there teaching the Abhidhamma to the assembled deities of ten thousand world-systems — leaving a duplicate Buddha behind to continue the teaching whenever he stepped away for his own daily almsround, gathering food from the Northern Kuru continent and briefing Elder Sāriputta each day on exactly how much Dhamma he had covered. Below on earth, an entire encampment of pilgrims waited twelve leagues wide simply to see him again — sustained the whole time by a single generous young merchant — until Elder Anuruddha located him with the divine eye, and Elder Mahāmoggallāna, diving straight through the solid earth and boring clean through Mount Sineru itself, surfaced at the Buddha's own feet to deliver the pilgrims' request and arrange his eventual return.
Devorohaṇenapi ca ayamattho vibhāvetabbo. Bhagavā kira yamakapāṭihāriyaṃ katvā caturāsītipāṇasahassāni bandhanā pamocetvā atītā buddhā yamakapāṭihāriyāvasāne kuhiṃ gatāti āvajjitvā tāvatiṃsabhavanaṃ gatāti addasa. Athekena pādena pathavītalaṃ akkamitvā dutiyaṃ yugandharapabbate patiṭṭhapetvā puna purimapādaṃ uddharitvā sinerumatthakaṃ akkamitvā tattha paṇḍukambalasilātale vassaṃ upagantvā sannipatitānaṃ dasasahassacakkavāḷadevatānaṃ ādito paṭṭhāya abhidhammakathaṃ ārabhi. Bhikkhācāravelāya nimmitabuddhaṃ māpesi. So dhammaṃ deseti. Bhagavā nāgalatādantakaṭṭhaṃ khāditvā anotattadahe mukhaṃ dhovitvā uttarakurūsu piṇḍapātaṃ gahetvā anotattadahatīre paribhuñjati. Sāriputtatthero tattha gantvā bhagavantaṃ vandati. Bhagavā ajja ettakaṃ dhammaṃ desesinti therassa nayaṃ deti. Evaṃ tayo māse abbocchinnaṃ abhidhammakathaṃ kathesi. Taṃ sutvā asītikoṭidevatānaṃ dhammābhisamayo ahosi.
Yamakapāṭihāriye sannipatitāpi dvādasayojanā parisā bhagavantaṃ passitvāva gamissāmāti khandhāvāraṃ bandhitvā aṭṭhāsi. Taṃ cūḷaanāthapiṇḍikaseṭṭhiyeva sabbapaccayehi upaṭṭhāsi. Manussā kuhiṃ bhagavāti jānanatthāya anuruddhattheraṃ yāciṃsu. Thero ālokaṃ vaḍḍhetvā addasa dibbena cakkhunā tattha vassūpagataṃ bhagavantaṃ disvā ārocesi.
Te bhagavato vandanatthāya mahāmoggallānattheraṃ yāciṃsu. Thero parisamajjheyeva mahāpathaviyaṃ nimujjitvā sinerupabbataṃ nibbijjhitvā tathāgatapādamūle bhagavato pāde vandamānova ummujjitvā bhagavantaṃ etadavoca "jambudīpavāsino, bhante, bhagavato pāde vanditvā passitvāva gamissāmāti vadantī"ti. Bhagavā āha "kuhiṃ pana te, moggallāna, etarahi jeṭṭhabhātā dhammasenāpatī"ti? "Saṅkassanagare bhante"ti. "Moggallāna, maṃ daṭṭhukāmā sve saṅkassanagaraṃ āgacchantu, ahaṃ sve mahāpavāraṇapuṇṇamāsīuposathadivase saṅkassanagare otarissāmī"ti. "Sādhu, bhante"ti thero dasabalaṃ vanditvā āgatamaggeneva oruyha manussānaṃ santikaṃ sampāpuṇi. Gamanāgamanakāle ca yathā naṃ manussā passanti, evaṃ adhiṭṭhāsi. Idaṃ tāvettha mahāmoggallānatthero āvibhāvapāṭihāriyaṃ akāsi.
This meaning should also be illustrated by the descent from the deva-world. It is told that the Blessed One, having performed the twin marvel and freed eighty-four thousand beings from bondage, reflecting, "where did the Buddhas of the past go at the conclusion of the twin marvel?", saw that they had gone to the Tāvatiṃsa realm. Then, having planted one foot on the surface of the earth, he set the second down upon Mount Yugandhara; then, lifting the first foot again, he set it upon the summit of Mount Sineru, and there, having entered the rains-retreat upon the Paṇḍukambala stone throne, he began, right from the beginning, an exposition of the Abhidhamma to the deities of ten thousand world-systems who had assembled there. At the time for the alms-round, he created a duplicate Buddha, who continued to teach the Dhamma. The Blessed One himself, having chewed a tooth-stick from a nāga-creeper, washed his face at Lake Anotatta, took almsfood in the Northern Kuru continent, and ate it on the shore of Lake Anotatta. Elder Sāriputta, going there, paid homage to the Blessed One. The Blessed One would give the elder an outline, saying, "today I taught this much Dhamma." In this way, for three months without interruption, he expounded the Abhidhamma. Hearing it, eighty koṭis of deities had a breakthrough to the Dhamma.
Even the assembly, twelve leagues in extent, that had gathered for the twin marvel, thinking, "we shall go only after we have seen the Blessed One," set up an encampment and remained there. The young merchant Cūḷaanāthapiṇḍika alone provided for them with every necessity. The people, wishing to know where the Blessed One was, requested Elder Anuruddha to find out. The elder, expanding his light, saw with the divine eye that the Blessed One had gone there for the rains-retreat, and reported it to them.
They then requested Elder Mahāmoggallāna to pay homage to the Blessed One on their behalf. The elder, right in the midst of the assembly, dove into the great earth, bored straight through Mount Sineru, and, surfacing right at the Tathāgata's own feet while paying homage there, said to the Blessed One, "Venerable sir, the inhabitants of Jambudīpa say, 'we shall go only after we have paid homage to and seen the Blessed One's feet.'" The Blessed One said, "But where, Moggallāna, is your elder brother, the General of the Dhamma, at present?" "In the city of Saṅkassa, venerable sir." "Moggallāna, let those wishing to see me come to the city of Saṅkassa tomorrow; I shall descend at the city of Saṅkassa tomorrow, on the full-moon Uposatha day of the great Pavāraṇā ceremony." "Very well, venerable sir," said the elder, and, having paid homage to the Ten-Powered One, descended by the very same route he had come, and arrived in the presence of the people. And, in both his going and his returning, he determined it so that the people could see him. This, then, is the marvel of becoming visible that Elder Mahāmoggallāna performed on this occasion.
The duplicate Buddha teaching the assembled deities while the "real" Buddha attends to his own daily almsround is a small but telling application of the mind-made body discussed earlier in the chapter: it shows the power being used not for spectacle but for simple logistical continuity, ensuring that three uninterrupted months of teaching never actually require the Buddha's single body to be present every single moment.
Moggallāna's route — diving straight down through solid earth and boring through an entire mountain rather than simply flying up and over it — is a curious choice worth noting: the story could easily have had him ascend by air, the more obviously "supernormal" route, but instead gives him the more dramatic image of tunneling directly through the world's own axis, surfacing precisely at the Buddha's feet as though the whole physical cosmos were simply no obstacle at all to a mind this thoroughly mastered.
the twin marvel — yamaka (a pair, twin) + pāṭihāriya (a marvel); the famous feat, unique to Buddhas, of emitting fire from the upper body and water from the lower simultaneously, mentioned here as the immediate prelude to the ascent to Tāvatiṃsa.
the pale-red-blanket stone — the traditional throne-like stone slab at the foot of a coral tree atop Mount Sineru, associated with Sakka's own realm, where the Buddha is said to have sat for his three-month teaching of the Abhidhamma.
the invitation ceremony — the formal end-of-rains-retreat rite in which monks invite one another's correction for any faults observed during the retreat, named here as marking the specific day set for the Buddha's return to the human world.
The Day the World Opened, and a Fan That Revealed Heaven and Hell
The Buddha's actual descent from Tāvatiṃsa, arranged for the very next day on three staircases of gold, silver, and jewels built to order by the divine architect Vissakamma, produced what tradition calls simply "the opening of the world": standing atop Mount Sineru, the Buddha made every world-system in all directions, and every plane from the lowest hell to the highest heaven, visible at once, so that humans and gods could see each other face to face without so much as tilting their heads. He himself descended the central, jeweled staircase, flanked by the sense-sphere gods on one side and the Brahmās on the other, escorted by Sakka carrying his bowl and robe, a Great Brahmā holding a three-league parasol, and a gandhabba playing music in his honor — a spectacle so overwhelming that not a single witnessing being failed to conceive the wish for future Buddhahood themselves. A much smaller but equally striking echo of the same power appears centuries later on the island of Sri Lanka, where Elder Dhammadinna, mid-sermon, simply turned his hand-fan face down to reveal all the way to Avīci hell, then face up to reveal all the way to the Brahmā-world, terrifying and enticing his listeners by turns until several attained the noble paths on the spot.
So evaṃ āgato taṃ pavattiṃ ārocetvā "dūranti saññaṃ akatvā katapātarāsāva nikkhamathā"ti āha. Bhagavā sakkassa devarañño ārocesi "mahārāja, sve manussalokaṃ gacchāmī"ti. Devarājā vissakammaṃ āṇāpesi "tāta, sve bhagavā manussalokaṃ gantukāmo, tisso sopānapantiyo māpehi ekaṃ kanakamayaṃ, ekaṃ rajatamayaṃ, ekaṃ maṇimaya"nti. So tathā akāsi. Bhagavā dutiyadivase sinerumuddhani ṭhatvā puratthimalokadhātuṃ olokesi, anekāni cakkavāḷasahassāni vivaṭāni hutvā ekaṅgaṇaṃ viya pakāsiṃsu. Yathā ca puratthimena, evaṃ pacchimenapi uttarenapi dakkhiṇenapi sabbaṃ vivaṭamaddasa. Heṭṭhāpi yāva avīci, upari yāva akaniṭṭhabhavanaṃ, tāva addasa.
Taṃ divasaṃ kira lokavivaraṇaṃ nāma ahosi. Manussāpi deve passanti, devāpi manusse. Tattha neva manussā uddhaṃ ullokenti, na devā adho olokenti, sabbe sammukhāva aññamaññaṃ passanti. Bhagavā majjhe maṇimayena sopānena otarati, chakāmāvacaradevā vāmapasse kanakamayena, suddhāvāsā ca mahābrahmā ca dakkhiṇapasse rajatamayena. Devarājā pattacīvaraṃ aggahesi, mahābrahmā tiyojanikaṃ setacchattaṃ, suyāmo vāḷabījaniṃ, pañcasikho gandhabbaputto tigāvutamattaṃ beḷuvapaṇḍuvīṇaṃ gahetvā tathāgatassa pūjaṃ karonto otarati. Taṃdivasaṃ bhagavantaṃ disvā buddhabhāvāya pihaṃ anuppādetvā ṭhitasatto nāma natthi. Idamettha bhagavā āvibhāvapāṭihāriyaṃ akāsi.
Apica tambapaṇṇidīpe talaṅgaravāsī dhammadinnattheropi tissamahāvihāre cetiyaṅgaṇasmiṃ nisīditvā "tīhi, bhikkhave, dhammehi samannāgato bhikkhu apaṇṇakapaṭipadaṃ paṭipanno hotī"ti apaṇṇakasuttaṃ (a. ni. 3.16) kathento heṭṭhāmukhaṃ bījaniṃ akāsi, yāva avīcito ekaṅgaṇaṃ ahosi. Tato uparimukhaṃ akāsi, yāva brahmalokā ekaṅgaṇaṃ ahosi. Thero nirayabhayena tajjetvā saggasukhena ca palobhetvā dhammaṃ desesi. Keci sotāpannā ahesuṃ, keci sakadāgāmī anāgāmī arahantoti.
He, having thus arrived, related this news, and said, "do not think it far — set out having already eaten your breakfast." The Blessed One informed Sakka, king of the devas, "Great king, tomorrow I shall go to the human world." The deva-king ordered Vissakamma: "Dear one, tomorrow the Blessed One wishes to go to the human world — create three flights of stairs, one made of gold, one of silver, and one of jewels." He did so. The Blessed One, on the following day, standing on the summit of Sineru, looked toward the eastern world-sphere; countless thousands of world-systems, opening up, appeared like a single courtyard. And just as toward the east, so too toward the west, the north, and the south, he saw everything laid open. Below, too, as far as Avīci, and above, as far as the Akaniṭṭha realm — that far he saw.
That day, it is said, was called "the opening of the world." Humans saw devas, and devas saw humans. And there, humans had no need to look upward, nor devas to look downward — all saw one another directly, face to face. The Blessed One descended by the middle staircase, made of jewels; the six classes of sense-sphere devas descended on the left side, by the golden one; the Pure Abodes and the Great Brahmā, on the right side, by the silver one. The deva-king carried his bowl and robe; the Great Brahmā held a three-league white parasol; Suyāma held a yak-tail fan; and Pañcasikha, son of the gandhabbas, taking up a beḷuva-wood lute three cubits long, descended making an offering to the Tathāgata. On that day, there was not a single being who, having seen the Blessed One, failed to conceive a longing for Buddhahood. This, then, is the marvel of becoming visible that the Blessed One performed on this occasion.
Moreover, on the island of Tambapaṇṇi, Elder Dhammadinna, a resident of Talaṅgara, sitting in the shrine-courtyard of the Tissa Great Monastery while teaching the Apaṇṇaka Sutta — "monks, a monk endowed with three qualities has entered upon the unfailing path" (A.N. 3.16) — turned his fan face down, and it became a single courtyard all the way to Avīci. Then he turned it face up, and it became a single courtyard all the way to the Brahmā-world. The elder, terrifying his listeners with the fear of hell and enticing them with the bliss of heaven, taught the Dhamma. Some became stream-enterers; some, once-returners, non-returners, or arahants.
The detail that neither humans nor devas needed to look up or down to see each other — "all saw one another directly, face to face" — is a carefully chosen image of genuine, symmetrical encounter rather than a hierarchical display: on this one extraordinary day, the ordinary cosmic ordering that places heavens above and the human world below is temporarily suspended, and beings from radically different planes of existence simply meet each other as equals in a shared field of vision.
Placing Dhammadinna's fan trick immediately after the Buddha's own cosmic display is a deliberate scaling exercise on the compiler's part: the same fundamental power — making the invisible visible — that once opened the entire universe to view for a single unrepeatable day can also be exercised, centuries later, by an ordinary accomplished elder, using nothing more than a hand-fan, to make an equally vivid and equally effective point to an audience of ordinary listeners.
the opening of the world — loka (world) + vivaraṇa (an opening, uncovering); the traditional name for this singular day when every plane of the cosmos became simultaneously visible to every being within it.
the highest of the Pure Abode realms — a- (not) + kaniṭṭha (youngest, lowest); named here as the upper boundary of everything the Buddha made visible, the precise counterpart to Avīci at the lowest extreme.
the discourse on the unfailing path — apaṇṇaka (unmistaken, unfailing); the specific sutta Elder Dhammadinna was teaching when he performed his own fan-based demonstration of heaven and hell, grounding the marvel directly in an ordinary act of Dhamma instruction.
Becoming Invisible: A Son Hidden From His Own Father
The mirror-image power, becoming invisible, works by exactly the reverse operations: light into darkness, the uncovered into the covered, within-range into out-of-range. Its first performer was again the Buddha, who made the young Yasa invisible to his own searching father though the young man sat right beside him — the very scene that led to Yasa's own eventual awakening. The same technique later let the Buddha hide King Udena's chief minister Mahākappina, together with his thousand ministers, from Queen Anojā and her retinue of a thousand women even as they sat directly nearby, redirecting the queen's attention from "finding the king" toward "finding herself" instead, with the whole assembly reaching the noble paths as a result. And centuries later, Elder Mahinda performed the identical feat on his own arrival in Sri Lanka, concealing his traveling companions from the king who greeted him.
Tirobhāvaṃ kātukāmo pana ālokaṃ vā andhakāraṃ karoti, appaṭicchannaṃ vā paṭicchannaṃ, āpāthaṃ vā anāpāthaṃ karoti. Kathaṃ? Ayañhi yathā appaṭicchannopi samīpe ṭhitopi vā na dissati, evaṃ attānaṃ vā paraṃ vā kātukāmo pādakajjhānato vuṭṭhāya "idaṃ ālokaṭṭhānaṃ andhakāraṃ hotū"ti vā, "idaṃ appaṭicchannaṃ paṭicchannaṃ hotū"ti vā, "idaṃ āpāthaṃ anāpāthaṃ hotū"ti vā āvajjitvā parikammaṃ katvā vuttanayeneva adhiṭṭhāti. Saha adhiṭṭhānacittena yathādhiṭṭhitameva hoti. Pare samīpe ṭhitāpi na passanti. Sayampi apassitukāmo na passati.
Etaṃ pana pāṭihāriyaṃ kena katapubbanti? Bhagavatā. Bhagavā hi yasaṃ kulaputtaṃ samīpe nisinnaṃyeva yathā naṃ pitā na passati, evamakāsi. Tathā vīsayojanasataṃ mahākappinassa paccuggamanaṃ katvā taṃ anāgāmiphale, amaccasahassañcassa sotāpattiphale patiṭṭhāpetvā, tassa anumaggaṃ āgatā sahassitthiparivārā anojādevī āgantvā samīpe nisinnāpi yathā saparisaṃ rājānaṃ na passati, tathā katvā "api, bhante, rājānaṃ passathā"ti vutte "kiṃ pana te rājānaṃ gavesituṃ varaṃ, udāhu attāna"nti? "Attānaṃ, bhante"ti vatvā nisinnāya tassā tathā dhammaṃ desesi, yathā sā saddhiṃ itthisahassena sotāpattiphale patiṭṭhāsi, amaccā anāgāmiphale, rājā arahatteti. Apica tambapaṇṇidīpaṃ āgatadivase yathā attanā saddhiṃ āgate avasese rājā na passati, evaṃ karontena mahindattherenāpi idaṃ katameva (pārā. aṭṭha. 1.tatiyasaṅgītikathā).
But one wishing to become invisible makes light into darkness, or the uncovered into the covered, or within-range into out-of-range. How? Just as something uncovered, or even something standing nearby, might in this way not be seen — so, wishing to make either himself or another invisible, emerging from the basis-jhāna, he adverts: "let this bright place become dark," or "let this uncovered thing become covered," or "let this within-range thing become out-of-range" — and, having performed the preliminary work, determines it by the method already stated. Together with the determining-consciousness, it becomes exactly as determined. Others, even standing nearby, do not see it. He himself too, not wishing to see, does not see.
But by whom was this marvel first performed? By the Blessed One. For the Blessed One made it so that the young man Yasa, sitting right nearby, could not be seen by his own father. Likewise, having gone a hundred and twenty leagues to meet Mahākappina, and having established him in the fruit of non-return and his thousand ministers in the fruit of stream-entry, when Queen Anojā, who had come following along the same road with her retinue of a thousand women, arrived, and, although sitting nearby, could not see the king together with his retinue — he arranged it so — and, when asked, "venerable sir, do you see the king?", he said, "which, then, would be better for you to seek — the king, or yourself?" And she, saying, "myself, venerable sir," sat down; and to her, sitting thus, he taught the Dhamma in such a way that she, together with her thousand women, became established in the fruit of stream-entry, the ministers in the fruit of non-return, and the king in arahantship. Moreover, on the day of his arrival on the island of Tambapaṇṇi, this very thing was done also by Elder Mahinda, making it so that the king could not see the rest who had come together with him.
The Buddha's reply to Queen Anojā — "which would be better for you to seek, the king, or yourself?" — turns a straightforward act of concealment into a piece of genuine spiritual instruction: the invisibility is not simply a trick that happens to precede the teaching, but the very device that redirects the queen's attention from an external search (finding her husband) to an internal one (finding herself), setting up exactly the frame of mind needed for the Dhamma that follows.
Placing Mahinda's arrival in Sri Lanka alongside these canonical Indian episodes performs the same function this treatise's stories have performed throughout: connecting the power described in abstract technical terms to a concrete, historically significant moment the reader would already know — in this case, the very founding event of Theravāda Buddhism's establishment on the island where this treatise itself was likely composed.
becoming invisible — tiras- (hidden, across) + bhāva (state); the exact mirror-image operation of āvibhāva, produced by reversing the same three variables of light, covering, and range.
a king who renounced his throne to become a monk under the Buddha, later a foremost disciple — his story here illustrates the power of invisibility used to protect a delicate teaching moment for his queen and former ministers.
the Elder credited with formally establishing Buddhism in Sri Lanka — his brief mention here, using the very same power just explained, ties this technical discussion directly to the historical founding of the tradition that produced this treatise.
Two Kinds of Marvel: When the Power Shows Itself, and When Only Its Effect Does
The chapter now draws a further distinction cutting across everything just discussed: an "openly manifest" marvel reveals both the power and the person performing it at once, while a "non-manifest" marvel reveals only the power's effect, leaving its source hidden. The twin marvel — fire from the upper body, water from the lower, visible to everyone at once as the Buddha's own doing — exemplifies the first kind. The second kind is illustrated by two quieter, more mysterious episodes: Elder Mahaka, asked by the householder Citta for a demonstration, retreated indoors and simply caused a flame to burn a bundle of grass placed on the porch, through a keyhole and door-crack, without ever singeing the outer robe placed beside it — visibly a marvel, but with no visible agent performing it. And the Buddha himself once made his own voice audible to an assembly of Brahmās while making his body invisible to them, so that they heard him but never saw who was speaking.
Apica sabbampi pākaṭaṃ pāṭihāriyaṃ āvibhāvaṃ nāma. Apākaṭapāṭihāriyaṃ tirobhāvaṃ nāma. Tattha pākaṭapāṭihāriye iddhipi paññāyati iddhimāpi. Taṃ yamakapāṭihāriyena dīpetabbaṃ. Tatra hi "idha tathāgato yamakapāṭihāriyaṃ karoti asādhāraṇaṃ sāvakehi. Uparimakāyato aggikkhandho pavattati, heṭṭhimakāyato udakadhārā pavattatī"ti (paṭi. ma. 1.116) evaṃ ubhayaṃ paññāyittha. Apākaṭapāṭihāriye iddhiyeva paññāyati, na iddhimā. Taṃ mahakasuttena (saṃ. ni. 4.346) ca brahmanimantanikasuttena (ma. ni. 1.501 ādayo) ca dīpetabbaṃ. Tatra hi āyasmato ca mahakassa, bhagavato ca iddhiyeva paññāyittha, na iddhimā.
Yathāha –
"Ekamantaṃ nisinno kho citto gahapati āyasmantaṃ mahakaṃ etadavoca 'sādhu me, bhante, ayyo mahako uttarimanussadhammā iddhipāṭihāriyaṃ dassetū'ti. Tena hi tvaṃ gahapati āḷinde uttarāsaṅgaṃ paññāpetvā tiṇakalāpaṃ okāsehīti. 'Evaṃ, bhante'ti kho citto gahapati āyasmato mahakassa paṭissutvā āḷinde uttarāsaṅgaṃ paññāpetvā tiṇakalāpaṃ okāsesi. Atha kho āyasmā mahako vihāraṃ pavisitvā tathārūpaṃ iddhābhisaṅkhāraṃ abhisaṅkhāsi, yathā tālacchiggaḷena ca aggaḷantarikāya ca acci nikkhamitvā tiṇāni jhāpesi, uttarāsaṅgaṃ na jhāpesī"ti (saṃ. ni. 4.346).
Yathā cāha –
"Atha khvāhaṃ, bhikkhave, tathārūpaṃ iddhābhisaṅkhāraṃ abhisaṅkhāsiṃ 'ettāvatā brahmā ca brahmaparisā ca brahmapārisajjā ca saddañca me sossanti, na ca maṃ dakkhissantī'ti antarahito imaṃ gāthaṃ abhāsiṃ —
"Bhave vāhaṃ bhayaṃ disvā, bhavañca vibhavesinaṃ;
Bhavaṃ nābhivadiṃ kiñci, nandiñca na upādiyi"nti. (ma. ni. 1.504)
Moreover, every openly manifest marvel is called "becoming visible"; every non-manifest marvel is called "becoming invisible." Herein, in an openly manifest marvel, both the power and the one who possesses the power are made known. This should be illustrated by the twin marvel. For there: "here, the Tathāgata performs the twin marvel, not shared with disciples: from the upper body a mass of fire proceeds, from the lower body a stream of water proceeds" (Paṭis. i.116) — thus both were made known at once. In a non-manifest marvel, only the power itself is made known, not its possessor. This should be illustrated by the Mahaka Sutta (S.N. 4.346) and the Brahmanimantanika Sutta (M.N. 1.501 and following). For there, in the case of both Venerable Mahaka and the Blessed One, only the power itself was made known, not the one who possessed it.
As it is said —
"The householder Citta, sitting to one side, said this to Venerable Mahaka: 'Venerable sir, it would be good if the venerable Mahaka would display a superhuman marvel of power.' 'Well then, householder, spread your outer robe on the porch, and place a bundle of grass there.' 'Very well, venerable sir,' said the householder Citta, and, having agreed to Venerable Mahaka's request, spread his outer robe on the porch and placed a bundle of grass there. Then Venerable Mahaka, having entered his dwelling, performed such a feat of supernormal determination that a flame came out through the keyhole and through the crack of the door, and burned up the grass — but did not burn the outer robe." (S.N. 4.346)
And as he said —
"Then, monks, I performed such a feat of supernormal determination that, thinking, 'let Brahmā, Brahmā's assembly, and Brahmā's retinue hear my voice to this extent, but not see me,' having become invisible, I spoke this verse —
"Having seen danger in existence, and beings seeking non-existence, I did not affirm any form of existence at all, nor did I cling to any delight in it." (M.N. 1.504)
The distinction between these two categories of marvel is not merely a classification exercise — it reflects a genuine difference in what an observer can actually learn. Watching the twin marvel, Citta's household, and the assembled crowds at Sāketa all knew immediately who was responsible for what they saw; but the grass burning behind a closed door, or a disembodied voice addressing an assembly of Brahmās, leaves the witness with proof that something extraordinary has happened while withholding proof of exactly who or what caused it.
The Buddha's choice to remain invisible while addressing the Brahmās in the Brahmanimantanika Sutta is worth reading in light of that sutta's larger point: the passage occurs in the context of correcting a Brahmā's mistaken belief in his own supreme, unsurpassed status, and the Buddha's decision to be heard but not seen arguably reinforces the lesson itself — the truth he speaks does not depend on, and is not validated by, any visible display of his own superior form.
an openly manifest marvel / a non-manifest marvel — pākaṭa (evident, well-known) with its negation; the twofold classification distinguishing marvels that reveal their performer from those that reveal only their effect.
a feat of supernormal determination — iddhi (power) + abhisaṅkhāra (a constructive, deliberate mental formation); the specific term used for the deliberate mental act producing both Mahaka's hidden fire and the Buddha's own selective invisibility before the Brahmās.
the discourse on the invitation of a Brahmā — the canonical source for the Buddha's invisible address to an assembly of Brahmās, given in a context of correcting a Brahmā's mistaken conviction in his own permanence and supremacy.
Walking Through Walls: A Debate Over Why Space, Specifically
The chapter now turns to a sequence of vivid physical feats, beginning with passing unobstructed through solid walls, ramparts, and even mountains as easily as through open air. The method requires the space kasiṇa specifically: the meditator adverts to the obstruction, determines "let this become space," and it genuinely becomes space — hollow for one wishing to go below or above, an opening for one wishing to pass straight through. This prompts a genuine scholarly disagreement recorded in the text itself: the learned Elder Tipiṭaka Cūḷābhaya argued that the space kasiṇa is unnecessary — since an elephant is not conjured by entering an "elephant kasiṇa," mastery of any of the eight kasiṇa attainments alone should suffice for anything one wishes. His fellow monks overruled him only on textual grounds: the canonical formula itself specifically names the space kasiṇa, and so that wording must be followed regardless of the logical point.
Tirokuṭṭaṃ tiropākāraṃ tiropabbataṃ asajjamāno gacchati seyyathāpi ākāseti ettha tirokuṭṭanti parakuṭṭaṃ, kuṭṭassa parabhāganti vuttaṃ hoti. Esa nayo itaresu. Kuṭṭoti ca gehabhittiyā etamadhivacanaṃ. Pākāroti gehavihāragāmādīnaṃ parikkhepapākāro. Pabbatoti paṃsupabbato vā pāsāṇapabbato vā. Asajjamānoti alaggamāno. Seyyathāpi ākāseti ākāse viya. Evaṃ gantukāmena pana ākāsakasiṇaṃ samāpajjitvā vuṭṭhāya kuṭṭaṃ vā pākāraṃ vā sinerucakkavāḷesupi aññataraṃ pabbataṃ vā āvajjitvā kataparikammena ākāso hotūti adhiṭṭhātabbo. Ākāsoyeva hoti. Adho otaritukāmassa, uddhaṃ vā ārohitukāmassa susiro hoti, vinivijjhitvā gantukāmassa chiddo. So tattha asajjamāno gacchati.
Tipiṭakacūḷābhayatthero panetthāha – "ākāsakasiṇasamāpajjanaṃ, āvuso, kimatthiyaṃ, kiṃ hatthiassādīni abhinimminitukāmo hatthiassādi kasiṇāni samāpajjati, nanu yattha katthaci kasiṇe parikammaṃ katvā aṭṭhasamāpattivasībhāvoyeva pamāṇaṃ. Yaṃ yaṃ icchati, taṃ tadeva hotī"ti. Bhikkhū āhaṃsu – "pāḷiyā, bhante, ākāsakasiṇaṃyeva āgataṃ, tasmā avassametaṃ vattabba"nti. Tatrāyaṃ pāḷi –
"Pakatiyā ākāsakasiṇasamāpattiyā lābhī hoti. Tirokuṭṭaṃ tiropākāraṃ tiropabbataṃ āvajjati. Āvajjitvā ñāṇena adhiṭṭhāti – 'ākāso hotū'ti. Ākāso hoti. Tirokuṭṭaṃ tiropākāraṃ tiropabbataṃ asajjamāno gacchati. Yathā manussā pakatiyā aniddhimanto kenaci anāvaṭe aparikkhitte asajjamānā gacchanti, evameva so iddhimā cetovasippatto tirokuṭṭaṃ tiropākāraṃ tiropabbataṃ asajjamāno gacchati, seyyathāpi ākāse"ti (paṭi. ma. 3.11).
Sace panassa bhikkhuno adhiṭṭhahitvā gacchantassa antarā pabbato vā rukkho vā uṭṭheti, kiṃ puna samāpajjitvā adhiṭṭhātabbanti? Doso natthi. Puna samāpajjitvā adhiṭṭhānaṃ hi upajjhāyassa santike nissayaggahaṇasadisaṃ hoti. Iminā ca pana bhikkhunā ākāso hotūti adhiṭṭhitattā ākāso hotiyeva. Purimādhiṭṭhānabaleneva cassa antarā añño pabbato vā rukkho vā utumayo uṭṭhahissatīti aṭṭhānamevetaṃ. Aññena iddhimatā nimmite pana paṭhamanimmānaṃ balavaṃ hoti. Itarena tassa uddhaṃ vā adho vā gantabbaṃ.
"He goes unobstructed through walls, through ramparts, through mountains, just as though through space": herein, "through a wall" means through another's wall, that is, through the far side of a wall. The same method applies to the others. "Wall" is a designation for a house's own partition-wall. "Rampart" is the enclosing wall around a house, monastery, village, and the like. "Mountain" is either a mountain of earth or a mountain of rock. "Unobstructed" means without catching, without sticking. "Just as though through space" means as though through open space. One wishing to travel in this way should, having attained the space kasiṇa and emerged from it, advert to a wall, a rampart, or a mountain — even Sineru or the mountains ringing the world-system — and, having performed the preliminary work, determine, "let this become space." It becomes space itself. For one wishing to descend below, or to ascend above, it becomes hollow; for one wishing to pass straight through, it becomes an opening. He goes there unobstructed.
But the Elder Tipiṭaka Cūḷābhaya said on this point: "friends, what is the purpose of entering upon the space kasiṇa? Does one wishing to create an elephant or a horse and the like enter upon an elephant-kasiṇa or a horse-kasiṇa? Is it not simply this: having done the preliminary work in whatever kasiṇa one likes, the only actual requirement is mastery over the eight attainments — and then, whatever one wishes for, that very thing comes about?" The monks replied: "venerable sir, it is specifically the space kasiṇa that has come down in the canonical text; therefore this must certainly be stated just as it is." Here is that canonical text —
"Being naturally a gainer of the space-kasiṇa attainment, he adverts to a wall, a rampart, a mountain. Having adverted, he determines by knowledge, 'let this become space.' It becomes space. He goes unobstructed through the wall, the rampart, the mountain. Just as ordinary people, without power, go unobstructed through what is open and unenclosed by anything — just so, this possessor of power, who has attained mastery of mind, goes unobstructed through the wall, the rampart, the mountain, as though through space." (Paṭis. iii.11)
If, for that monk, while going after having so determined, another mountain or tree should arise in between, should he enter the attainment and determine it again? There is no fault in doing so. For entering again and determining anew is comparable to taking dependence anew in the presence of one's preceptor. And, because this monk has determined, "let this become space," it does indeed become space. And, by the very power of his earlier determination, it is simply not possible that another mountain or tree should naturally arise in between. But in the case of something created by another possessor of power, the first creation is the stronger; the other must then go around it, either above or below.
The exchange between Cūḷābhaya and his fellow monks is a rare, explicit moment of methodological disagreement preserved rather than smoothed over: Cūḷābhaya's logical objection is never actually refuted on its own terms — nobody explains why the space kasiṇa should be specially necessary if mastery alone suffices elsewhere — and the matter is settled purely by appeal to the canonical text's own specific wording. The treatise records the disagreement honestly rather than manufacturing a tidy resolution.
The rule about competing determinations — a naturally arising obstacle cannot appear within an already-determined space, but another meditator's independently created obstacle can, with the earlier creation simply taking precedence — quietly establishes something significant about how this power interacts with other agents' own exercise of the same power: one master's determination is absolute against ordinary reality, but not against a rival master's equally valid determination, which must instead be navigated around like any other real obstacle.
the space kasiṇa — one of the ten kasiṇa devices treated in earlier chapters, here shown to be the specific meditative basis required for passing unobstructed through solid matter, according to the canonical formula's own wording.
taking dependence — the formal act by which a junior monk places himself under a senior teacher's guidance; used here as a simile for how naturally it is to simply re-enter the attainment and re-determine when an unexpected obstacle appears.
"Cūḷābhaya, Master of the Three Piṭakas" — an honorific for a monk who had mastered the entire canon by memory, whose recorded but overruled objection in this passage is a small but genuine glimpse of internal scholarly debate within the commentarial tradition.
Diving Through Solid Earth as Though It Were Water
The next feat reverses the usual relationship between earth and water: using the water kasiṇa this time, the meditator delimits a specific area of ground, determines "let this be water," and genuinely dives in and out of the earth there exactly as an ordinary swimmer would in a pool. The power extends well beyond mere diving — bathing, drinking, washing clothes, even drawing out ghee, oil, honey, or molasses that remain genuinely ghee, oil, honey, or molasses once removed into a container. And the transformation is entirely private to the meditator unless he deliberately extends it: for everyone else, the ground remains solid ground the whole time, people continuing to walk, ride, and even farm across the very same delimited spot — unless he specifically wills that it become water for them as well, and it reverts to ordinary earth automatically once the determined time period expires.
Pathaviyāpi ummujjanimujjanti ettha ummujjanti uṭṭhānaṃ vuccati. Nimujjanti saṃsīdanaṃ. Ummujjañca nimujjañca ummujjanimujjaṃ. Evaṃ kātukāmena āpokasiṇaṃ samāpajjitvā uṭṭhāya ettake ṭhāne pathavī udakaṃ hotūti paricchinditvā parikammaṃ katvā vuttanayeneva adhiṭṭhātabbaṃ. Saha adhiṭṭhānena yathā paricchinne ṭhāne pathavī udakameva hoti. So tattha ummujjanimujjaṃ karoti. Tatrāyaṃ pāḷi –
"Pakatiyā āpokasiṇasamāpattiyā lābhī hoti. Pathaviṃ āvajjati. Āvajjitvā ñāṇena adhiṭṭhāti – 'udakaṃ hotū'ti. Udakaṃ hoti. So pathaviyā ummujjanimujjaṃ karoti. Yathā manussā pakatiyā aniddhimanto udake ummujjanimujjaṃ karonti, evameva so iddhimā cetovasippatto pathaviyā ummujjanimujjaṃ karoti, seyyathāpi udake"ti (paṭi. ma. 3.11).
Na kevalañca ummujjanimujjameva, nhānapānamukhadhovanabhaṇḍakadhovanādīsu yaṃ yaṃ icchati, taṃ taṃ karoti. Na kevalañca udakameva, sappitelamadhuphāṇitādīsupi yaṃ yaṃ icchati, taṃ taṃ idañcidañca ettakaṃ hotūti āvajjitvā parikammaṃ katvā adhiṭṭhahantassa yathādhiṭṭhitameva hoti. Uddharitvā bhājanagataṃ karontassa sappi sappimeva hoti. Telādīni telādīniyeva. Udakaṃ udakameva. So tattha temitukāmova temeti, na temitukāmo na temeti. Tasseva ca sā pathavī udakaṃ hoti sesajanassa pathavīyeva. Tattha manussā pattikāpi gacchanti, yānādīhipi gacchanti, kasikammādīnipi karontiyeva. Sace panāyaṃ tesampi udakaṃ hotūti icchati, hotiyeva. Paricchinnakālaṃ pana atikkamitvā yaṃ pakatiyā ghaṭataḷākādīsu udakaṃ, taṃ ṭhapetvā avasesaṃ paricchinnaṭṭhānaṃ pathavīyeva hoti.
"Diving in and out of the earth": herein, "diving out" refers to rising up; "diving in" refers to sinking down. Diving out and diving in together are "diving in and out." One wishing to do this should, having attained the water kasiṇa and emerged from it, delimit an area, thinking, "let the earth in this much space become water," and, having performed the preliminary work, determine it by the method already stated. Together with that determination, in the delimited area, the earth becomes water itself. He dives in and out of it there. Here is the canonical text —
"Being naturally a gainer of the water-kasiṇa attainment, he adverts to the earth. Having adverted, he determines by knowledge, 'let this be water.' It becomes water. He dives in and out of the earth. Just as ordinary people, without power, dive in and out of water — just so, this possessor of power, who has attained mastery of mind, dives in and out of the earth, as though it were water." (Paṭis. iii.11)
And not merely diving in and out — he does whatever he wishes among bathing, drinking, washing his face, washing his belongings, and the like. And not merely water — among ghee, oil, honey, molasses, and the like, whatever he wishes, adverting, "let this and that, this much, be so-and-so," and performing the preliminary work, whatever he determines becomes exactly that. Drawing it out and putting it into a vessel, ghee remains ghee; oil and the rest remain oil and the rest; water remains water. He, wishing to become wet there, becomes wet; not wishing to become wet, he does not become wet. And that earth becomes water for him alone, remaining earth for everyone else. There, people continue to go on foot, to travel by vehicles, and even to carry on farming. But if he wishes that it become water for them too, it does become so. But once the determined time period has passed, apart from whatever water is naturally present in a jar, a pond, or the like, the remaining delimited area becomes earth once again.
The insistence that ghee stays ghee, oil stays oil, and water stays water once drawn out into a container is a small but philosophically important safeguard: it confirms that this power transforms genuine substance, not mere appearance — the meditator is not producing an illusion that would dissolve on contact, but actually altering the earth's underlying nature within the delimited area, in a way that persists and behaves exactly as the substance it has become.
The default privacy of the effect — the same ground being solid earth for everyone else even while it is genuine water for the meditator alone — reveals something important about how these powers are meant to interact with the ordinary world: nothing here is imposed on unwitting bystanders by default. Extending the transformation to others requires a separate, deliberate act of will, treating other people's experience of reality as something the meditator must specifically choose to affect, not something automatically swept along by his own attainment.
diving out and diving in — ummujjati (to rise up, emerge) + nimujjati (to sink, submerge); the paired action of surfacing and submerging, here performed through solid ground exactly as through water.
to delimit, mark off — pari- (around) + chid- (to cut); the essential preliminary step of specifying exactly which area of ground is to be transformed, without which the power would have no defined scope.
molasses, unrefined sugar syrup — one of several substances named alongside ghee, oil, and honey as things the meditator can cause the transformed earth to become instead of plain water, each retaining its genuine, distinct nature once drawn out.
Walking on Water: The Mirror Image, Using the Earth Kasiṇa
The feat now runs in the opposite direction from the previous one: using the earth kasiṇa this time, the meditator delimits an area of water, determines "let this be earth," and walks — or stands, sits, or lies down — upon it exactly as on solid ground, the water simply refusing to break beneath him. The same private, reversible, and extendable qualities apply as before: fish and water-birds continue swimming through the very same patch as ordinary water, the meditator alone experiencing it as ground, unless he specifically wills the transformation to be shared, and the effect lapses back into ordinary water once the fixed time period runs out. The power is not limited to producing earth either — a jeweled mountain, a golden mountain, or a tree can be conjured in its place by exactly the same procedure.
Udakepi abhijjamāneti ettha yaṃ udakaṃ akkamitvā saṃsīdati, taṃ bhijjamānanti vuccati. Viparītaṃ abhijjamānaṃ. Evaṃ gantukāmena pana pathavīkasiṇaṃ samāpajjitvā vuṭṭhāya ettake ṭhāne udakaṃ pathavī hotūti paricchinditvā parikammaṃ katvā vuttanayeneva adhiṭṭhātabbaṃ. Saha adhiṭṭhānena yathā paricchinnaṭṭhāne udakaṃ pathavīyeva hoti. So tattha gacchati, tatrāyaṃ pāḷi –
"Pakatiyā pathavīkasiṇasamāpattiyā lābhī hoti. Udakaṃ āvajjati. Āvajjitvā ñāṇena adhiṭṭhāti – 'pathavī hotū'ti. Pathavī hoti. So abhijjamāne udake gacchati. Yathā manussā pakatiyā aniddhimanto abhijjamānāya pathaviyā gacchanti, evameva so iddhimā cetovasippatto abhijjamāne udake gacchati, seyyathāpi pathaviya"nti (paṭi. ma. 3.11).
Na kevalañca gacchati, yaṃ yaṃ iriyāpathaṃ icchati, taṃ taṃ karoti. Na kevalañca pathavimeva karoti, maṇisuvaṇṇapabbatarukkhādīsupi yaṃ yaṃ icchati, taṃ taṃ vuttanayeneva āvajjitvā adhiṭṭhāti, yathādhiṭṭhitameva hoti. Tasseva ca taṃ udakaṃ pathavī hoti, sesajanassa udakameva, macchakacchapā ca udakakākādayo ca yathāruci vicaranti. Sace panāyaṃ aññesampi manussānaṃ taṃ pathaviṃ kātuṃ icchati, karotiyeva. Paricchinnakālātikkamena pana udakameva hoti.
"Walking on unbreaking water": herein, water that, when stepped on, sinks down is called "breaking"; the opposite is "not breaking." One wishing to walk in this way should, having attained the earth kasiṇa and emerged from it, delimit an area, thinking, "let the water in this much space become earth," and, having performed the preliminary work, determine it by the method already stated. Together with that determination, in the delimited area, the water becomes earth itself. He walks there. Here is the canonical text —
"Being naturally a gainer of the earth-kasiṇa attainment, he adverts to the water. Having adverted, he determines by knowledge, 'let this be earth.' It becomes earth. He walks on the unbreaking water. Just as ordinary people, without power, walk on unbreaking earth — just so, this possessor of power, who has attained mastery of mind, walks on unbreaking water, as though it were earth." (Paṭis. iii.11)
And not merely walking — he adopts whatever posture he wishes there. And not merely making it earth — among a jewel-mountain, a golden mountain, a tree, and the like, whatever he wishes, adverting by the same method, he determines it, and it becomes exactly as determined. And that water becomes earth for him alone; for everyone else it remains water, and fish, tortoises, water-crows, and the like continue to move about there just as they please. But if he wishes to make it earth for other people too, he does so. But once the determined time period has passed, it becomes water once again.
Reading this feat directly against the previous one reveals a deliberate symmetry running through this entire cluster of powers: earth-into-water uses the water kasiṇa, water-into-earth uses the earth kasiṇa — the meditator always draws on mastery of the very element he wishes the target substance to become, never on mastery of the element being replaced. This consistency suggests a coherent underlying principle rather than a loose grab-bag of unrelated tricks.
The detail that fish, tortoises, and water-birds carry on exactly as before within the very same patch of water the meditator now experiences as solid ground is a small but vivid illustration of how thoroughly private, by default, this entire family of powers actually is — reality itself has not been rewritten for the world at large, only the meditator's own specific relationship to one delimited patch of it.
unbreaking, not giving way — a- (not) + bhijjati (to break, split); describing water treated so that it supports weight exactly as solid ground would, the defining feature of this specific feat.
a posture, a bodily deportment — standing, sitting, walking, and lying down; the four basic bodily positions the meditator can freely adopt while the water beneath him remains solid.
a water-crow, a cormorant — one of several aquatic creatures named as continuing their ordinary behavior in the very same water the meditator is simultaneously experiencing as dry ground.
Flying Cross-Legged Like a Bird — And Why the Divine Eye Is Not Optional
Flight itself, the chapter now explains, is simply another application of the earth kasiṇa: rather than transforming an already-solid surface, the meditator delimits a patch of open space exactly the size of a cross-legged seat, a bed, or a walking path — whichever posture he intends to travel in — and determines it to be earth, producing solid support wherever he wills it through the sky. But an important safety requirement is added that the previous feats never mentioned: anyone traveling by air must also possess the divine eye, since unseen mountains, trees, or jealous nāgas and garuḍas creating obstacles in mid-flight pose a real danger that only advanced perception can spot in time. Another elder is recorded objecting that a mind already this concentrated should not need to formally re-enter jhāna at all before each determination — but the text insists on following the same careful, step-by-step procedure regardless. The divine eye also serves a second, more modest purpose: scouting a suitably discreet landing spot, so the meditator does not descend conspicuously at a public bathing-place or village gate and draw unwanted attention.
Pallaṅkena kamatīti pallaṅkena gacchati. Pakkhī sakuṇoti pakkhehi yuttasakuṇo. Evaṃ kātukāmena pana pathavīkasiṇaṃ samāpajjitvā vuṭṭhāya sace nisinno gantumicchati, pallaṅkappamāṇaṃ ṭhānaṃ paricchinditvā parikammaṃ katvā vuttanayeneva adhiṭṭhātabbaṃ. Sace nipanno gantukāmo hoti mañcappamāṇaṃ, sace padasā gantukāmo hoti maggappamāṇanti evaṃ yathānurūpaṃ ṭhānaṃ paricchinditvā vuttanayeneva pathavī hotūti adhiṭṭhātabbaṃ, saha adhiṭṭhānena pathavīyeva hoti. Tatrāyaṃ pāḷi –
"Ākāsepi pallaṅkena kamati, seyyathāpi pakkhī sakuṇoti. Pakatiyā pathavīkasiṇasamāpattiyā lābhī hoti, ākāsaṃ āvajjati. Āvajjitvā ñāṇena adhiṭṭhāti – 'pathavī hotū'ti. Pathavī hoti. So ākāse antalikkhe caṅkamatipi tiṭṭhatipi nisīdatipi seyyampi kappeti. Yathā manussā pakatiyā aniddhimanto pathaviyaṃ caṅkamantipi…pe… seyyampi kappenti, evameva so iddhimā cetovasippatto ākāse antalikkhe caṅkamatipi…pe… seyyampi kappetī"ti (paṭi. ma. 3.11).
Ākāse gantukāmena ca bhikkhunā dibbacakkhulābhināpi bhavitabbaṃ. Kasmā? Antare utusamuṭṭhānā vā pabbatarukkhādayo honti, nāgasupaṇṇādayo vā usūyantā māpenti, nesaṃ dassanatthaṃ. Te pana disvā kiṃ kātabbanti? Pādakajjhānaṃ samāpajjitvā vuṭṭhāya ākāso hotūti parikammaṃ katvā adhiṭṭhātabbaṃ. Thero panāha "samāpattisamāpajjanaṃ, āvuso, kimatthiyaṃ, nanu samāhitamevassa cittaṃ, tena yaṃ yaṃ ṭhānaṃ ākāso hotūti adhiṭṭhāti, ākāsoyeva hotī"ti. Kiñcāpi evamāha, atha kho tirokuṭṭapārihāriye vuttanayeneva paṭipajjitabbaṃ.
Apica okāse orohaṇatthampi iminā dibbacakkhulābhinā bhavitabbaṃ, ayañhi sace anokāse nhānatitthe vā gāmadvāre vā orohati. Mahājanassa pākaṭo hoti. Tasmā dibbacakkhunā passitvā anokāsaṃ vajjetvā okāse otaratīti.
"He travels cross-legged": he goes seated cross-legged. "Like a winged bird": a bird equipped with wings. One wishing to do this should, having attained the earth kasiṇa and emerged from it, if he wishes to travel seated, delimit an area the size of a cross-legged seat, and, having performed the preliminary work, determine it by the method already stated. If he wishes to travel lying down, the size of a bed; if he wishes to travel on foot, the size of a path — thus, having delimited an appropriately sized area, he should determine, by the method already stated, "let this be earth." Together with that determination, it becomes earth itself. Here is the canonical text —
"'He travels cross-legged through the sky, just like a winged bird.' Being naturally a gainer of the earth-kasiṇa attainment, he adverts to space. Having adverted, he determines by knowledge, 'let this be earth.' It becomes earth. He walks, stands, sits, and lies down in the sky, in open space. Just as ordinary people, without power, walk … and lie down on the earth — just so, this possessor of power, who has attained mastery of mind, walks … and lies down in the sky, in open space." (Paṭis. iii.11)
And a monk wishing to travel through the sky should also be one who has obtained the divine eye. Why? Because, in between, there may be naturally arisen mountains, trees, and the like, or nāgas, garuḍas, and the like creating obstacles out of envy — the divine eye is needed in order to see these. And, having seen them, what should be done? Having entered the basis-jhāna and emerged from it, he should perform the preliminary work and determine, "let this be space." But an elder said: "friend, what is the purpose of entering the attainment at all? Is his mind not already concentrated? By that alone, whatever place he determines, 'let this be space' — does it not simply become space?" Although he said this, nevertheless, the same procedure already stated for the "passing through walls" method should be followed here.
Moreover, this possessor of the divine eye should also use it for the purpose of descending in a proper place. For if he descends in an improper place — a bathing landing, or a village gate — he becomes conspicuous to the general public. Therefore, having seen with the divine eye and avoided an improper place, he descends in a proper place.
The requirement to delimit the exact size and shape of the flying surface — a cross-legged seat, a bed, a path — depending on the intended posture is a small but telling detail: the power does not simply grant generalized flight, but requires the meditator to specify, in advance, precisely how much solid support he needs and in what configuration, treating airborne travel as an exacting engineering problem rather than an effortless, unbounded capability.
The unnamed elder's objection here echoes Cūḷābhaya's earlier challenge to the necessity of the space kasiṇa, and receives exactly the same kind of answer: the canonical procedure is followed as stated, regardless of whether a more economical shortcut might seem logically sufficient. The recurrence of this same pattern of objection and textual deference suggests it was a live methodological question within the tradition, not a one-off aside.
the divine eye — dibba (divine, heavenly) + cakkhu (eye); one of the five mundane direct knowledges named at this chapter's opening, here identified as a practical safety requirement for anyone attempting flight, not merely an optional bonus attainment.
nāgas and garuḍas — two classes of powerful, often rival mythological beings, named here as potential sources of jealousy-driven obstacles a flying meditator might encounter mid-journey.
a suitable place / an unsuitable place — the practical concern of discretion in landing, treated here as a second, entirely separate use for the divine eye beyond mere obstacle-avoidance.
Touching the Sun and Moon — No Kasiṇa Required, and a Debate About Growing Hands
The last of this cluster of physical feats requires no kasiṇa attainment at all — only the basis-jhāna for direct knowledge itself is needed, since the sun and moon, despite orbiting forty-two thousand leagues above and illuminating three continents at once, are simply brought within hand's reach by determination alone, exactly like any nearby object. The meditator can either travel to them directly or, remaining seated or lying down, simply will them to approach — at which point they come, "like a palm-fruit released from its stalk," or else his own hand stretches out to meet them. This last detail sparks a technical debate recorded in the text: when a limb stretches to reach something distant, does the meditator's actual living tissue elongate, or only the non-living material dependent on it? One elder pointedly objects, citing Mahāmoggallāna's own well-attested ability to shrink small enough to pass through a keyhole and grow large again at will, that living tissue itself evidently can do both.
Imepi candimasūriye evaṃmahiddhike evaṃmahānubhāve pāṇinā parāmasati parimajjatīti ettha candimasūriyānaṃ dvācattālīsayojanasahassassa upari caraṇena mahiddhikatā, tīsu dīpesu ekakkhaṇe ālokakaraṇena mahānubhāvatā veditabbā. Evaṃ upari caraṇaālokakaraṇehi vā mahiddhike teneva mahānubhāve. Parāmasatīti pariggaṇhati ekadese vā chupati. Parimajjatīti samantato ādāsatalaṃ viya parimajjati. Ayaṃ panassa iddhi abhiññāpādakajjhānavaseneva ijjhati, natthettha kasiṇasamāpattiniyamo. Vuttañhetaṃ paṭisambhidāyaṃ –
"Imepi candimasūriye…pe… parimajjatīti idha so iddhimā cetovasippatto candimasūriye āvajjati, āvajjitvā ñāṇena adhiṭṭhāti – 'hatthapāse hotū'ti. Hatthapāse hoti. So nisinnako vā nipannako vā candimasūriye pāṇinā āmasati parāmasati parimajjati. Yathā manussā pakatiyā aniddhimanto kiñcideva rūpagataṃ hatthapāse āmasanti parāmasanti parimajjanti, evameva so iddhimā…pe… parimajjatī"ti (paṭi. ma. 3.12).
Svāyaṃ yadi icchati gantvā parāmasituṃ, gantvā parāmasati, yadi pana idheva nisinnako vā nipannako vā parāmasitukāmo hoti, hatthapāse hotūti adhiṭṭhāti, adhiṭṭhānabalena vaṇṭā muttatālaphalaṃ viya āgantvā hatthapāse ṭhite vā parāmasati, hatthaṃ vā vaḍḍhetvā. Vaḍḍhentassa pana kiṃ upādiṇṇakaṃ vaḍḍhati, anupādiṇṇakanti? Upādiṇṇakaṃ nissāya anupādiṇṇakaṃ vaḍḍhati.
Tattha tipiṭakacūḷanāgatthero āha "kiṃ panāvuso, upādiṇṇakaṃ khuddakampi mahantampi na hoti, nanu yadā bhikkhu tālacchiddādīhi nikkhamati, tadā upādiṇṇakaṃ khuddakaṃ hoti. Yadā mahantaṃ attabhāvaṃ karoti, tadā mahantaṃ hoti mahāmoggallānattherassa viyā"ti.
"Even these moon and sun, of such great power, of such great majesty, he touches and strokes with his hand": herein, the moon and sun's "great power" should be understood by their course above a height of forty-two thousand leagues; their "great majesty" should be understood by their producing light simultaneously in three continents. Thus, by their course above and their producing of light, they are of great power, and precisely by that, of great majesty. "He touches" means he grasps, or touches in part. "He strokes" means he strokes all around, as though stroking the surface of a mirror. But this power of his is accomplished simply by virtue of the jhāna serving as the basis for direct knowledge — there is here no fixed requirement of any particular kasiṇa attainment. For this was said in the Paṭisambhidāmagga —
"'Even these moon and sun ... he strokes': here, this possessor of power, who has attained mastery of mind, adverts to the moon and sun. Having adverted, he determines by knowledge, 'let them come within hand's reach.' They come within hand's reach. He, whether sitting or lying down, touches, grasps, and strokes the moon and sun with his hand. Just as ordinary people, without power, touch, grasp, and stroke some material object within hand's reach — just so, this possessor of power ... strokes them." (Paṭis. iii.12)
This one, if he wishes to go and touch it, goes and touches it; but if, remaining right where he is, sitting or lying down, he wishes to touch it, he determines, "let it come within hand's reach," and, by the power of that determination, it comes, like a palm-fruit released from its stalk, and stands within hand's reach, and he touches it — or else he stretches out his hand to reach it. But when he stretches it, does the living part grow, or the non-living part? The non-living part grows in dependence on the living part.
Herein, the Elder Tipiṭaka Cūḷanāga said: "but friend, can the living part itself not become both small and large? Is it not so that when a monk passes out through a hole in a palm-leaf or the like, the living part becomes small; and when he makes his body large, it becomes large — just as with Elder Mahāmoggallāna?"
The absence of any kasiṇa requirement here is a genuinely notable exception within this whole cluster of powers: every other feat covered in this chapter — passing through walls, diving through earth, walking on water, flying — required mastery of a specific kasiṇa matched to the substance being transformed. Touching the sun and moon needs nothing but the basis-jhāna itself, since nothing is actually being transformed; the sun and moon are simply relocated, by determination alone, into an ordinary spatial relationship with the meditator's own hand.
The debate over whether "living" or "non-living" tissue grows when a hand stretches to reach something distant is a rare moment of the commentarial tradition applying rigorous physiological categories to what might otherwise seem a purely fantastical detail — and Cūḷanāga's counter-example, appealing to Mahāmoggallāna's well-known ability to shrink and enlarge his entire body, treats the question as an empirical one, settleable by known precedent, rather than a matter of pure speculation.
hand's reach, arm's length — hattha (hand) + pāsa (a snare, a bond, hence a defined range); the specific proximity the sun and moon are determined into, regardless of their actual astronomical distance.
living, clung-to material / non-living, non-clung-to material — the technical Abhidhamma distinction between bodily tissue bound up with life-faculty and mere physical matter, applied here to the puzzle of what actually elongates when a hand stretches.
a released palm-fruit — mutta (released, let go) + tāla (palm tree) + phala (fruit); the simile for how the sun and moon are said to detach and approach the meditator's hand once determined to be within reach.
The Taming of Nandopananda, Part One: A Nāga King's Wrath
The chapter now sets aside its technical explanations for a single, extended narrative: the taming of the nāga king Nandopananda. Having accepted an invitation to alms at Anāthapiṇḍika's house, the Buddha spent the night surveying the ten-thousand-fold world-system with his knowledge, and saw a wrong-viewed, faithless nāga king named Nandopananda come into range — along with the one person capable of weaning him off that wrong view, Elder Mahāmoggallāna. The next morning, rather than going directly to the meal, the Buddha announced a "excursion among the gods" and led five hundred monks flying directly over the top of Nandopananda's own lavish drinking-party canopy, deliberately making sure the nāga king would see them passing overhead. Enraged at what he took as an insult — ascetics scattering the dust of their feet over his head on their way to and from the heaven of the gods — Nandopananda abandoned his human-like form, coiled seven times around Mount Sineru itself, and spread his hood over the summit, plunging the entire Tāvatiṃsa heaven into darkness and rendering it invisible to the monks below.
Ekasmiṃ kira samaye anāthapiṇḍiko gahapati bhagavato dhammadesanaṃ sutvā "sve, bhante, pañcahi bhikkhusatehi saddhiṃ amhākaṃ gehe bhikkhaṃ gaṇhathā"ti nimantetvā pakkami. Bhagavā adhivāsetvā taṃdivasāvasesaṃ rattibhāgañca vītināmetvā paccūsasamaye dasasahassilokadhātuṃ olokesi. Athassa nandopanando nāma nāgarājā ñāṇamukhe āpāthamāgacchi. Bhagavā "ayaṃ nāgarājā mayhaṃ ñāṇamukhe āpāthamāgacchi, atthi nu kho assa upanissayo"ti āvajjento "ayaṃ micchādiṭṭhiko tīsu ratanesu appasannoti disvā ko nu kho imaṃ micchādiṭṭhito viveceyyā"ti āvajjento mahāmoggallānattheraṃ addasa.
Tato pabhātāya rattiyā sarīrapaṭijagganaṃ katvā āyasmantaṃ ānandaṃ āmantesi – "ānanda, pañcannaṃ bhikkhusatānaṃ ārocehi tathāgato devacārikaṃ gacchatī"ti. Taṃ divasañca nandopanandassa āpānabhūmiṃ sajjayiṃsu. So dibbaratanapallaṅke dibbena setacchattena dhāriyamānena tividhanāṭakehi ceva nāgaparisāya ca parivuto dibbabhājanesu upaṭṭhāpitaṃ annapānavidhiṃ olokayamāno nisinno hoti. Atha bhagavā yathā nāgarājā passati, tathā katvā tassa vitānamatthakeneva pañcahi bhikkhusatehi saddhiṃ tāvatiṃsadevalokābhimukho pāyāsi.
Tena kho pana samayena nandopanandassa nāgarājassa evarūpaṃ pāpakaṃ diṭṭhigataṃ uppannaṃ hoti – "ime hi nāma muṇḍakā samaṇakā amhākaṃ uparūparibhavanena devānaṃ tāvatiṃsānaṃ bhavanaṃ pavisantipi nikkhamantipi, na dāni ito paṭṭhāya imesaṃ amhākaṃ matthake pādapaṃsuṃ okirantānaṃ gantuṃ dassāmī"ti uṭṭhāya sinerupādaṃ gantvā taṃ attabhāvaṃ vijahitvā sineruṃ sattakkhattuṃ bhogehi parikkhipitvā upari phaṇaṃ katvā tāvatiṃsabhavanaṃ avakujjena phaṇena gahetvā adassanaṃ gamesi.
Atha kho āyasmā raṭṭhapālo bhagavantaṃ etadavoca "pubbe, bhante, imasmiṃ padese ṭhito sineruṃ passāmi, sineruparibhaṇḍaṃ passāmi, tāvatiṃsaṃ passāmi, vejayantaṃ passāmi, vejayantassa pāsādassa upari dhajaṃ passāmi. Ko nu kho, bhante, hetu ko paccayo, yaṃ etarahi neva sineruṃ passāmi…pe… na vejayantassa pāsādassa upari dhajaṃ passāmī"ti. "Ayaṃ, raṭṭhapāla, nandopanando nāma nāgarājā tumhākaṃ kupito sineruṃ sattakkhattuṃ bhogehi parikkhipitvā upari phaṇena paṭicchādetvā andhakāraṃ katvā ṭhito"ti. "Damemi naṃ, bhante"ti. Na bhagavā anujāni. Atha kho āyasmā bhaddiyo āyasmā rāhuloti anukkamena sabbepi bhikkhū uṭṭhahiṃsu. Na bhagavā anujāni.
It is told that, once, the householder Anāthapiṇḍika, having heard the Blessed One's teaching of the Dhamma, invited him, saying, "tomorrow, venerable sir, please come with five hundred monks to receive alms at our house," and departed. The Blessed One accepted, and, having passed the remainder of that day and that night, surveyed the ten-thousandfold world-system at dawn. Then a nāga king named Nandopananda came within the range of his knowledge. The Blessed One, reflecting, "this nāga king has come within the range of my knowledge — is there, I wonder, a supporting condition for him?", and, reflecting further, seeing, "this one holds wrong view and has no confidence in the Three Jewels — now, who could wean him from this wrong view?", saw Elder Mahāmoggallāna.
Then, when the night had grown light, having attended to his bodily needs, he addressed Venerable Ānanda: "Ānanda, inform the five hundred monks that the Tathāgata is going on an excursion among the gods." On that same day, a drinking-party had been prepared for Nandopananda. He sat upon a divine, jeweled couch, a divine white parasol held over him, surrounded by three kinds of dancers and his nāga retinue, watching the arrangement of food and drink laid out in divine vessels. Then the Blessed One, making sure the nāga king would see him, set out, together with the five hundred monks, flying right over the peak of his canopy, heading toward the realm of the Tāvatiṃsa gods.
Now, at that time, such an evil view had arisen in the nāga king Nandopananda: "these shaven-headed ascetics, flying about repeatedly right above us, enter and leave the realm of the Tāvatiṃsa gods — from now on I shall not let them go on scattering the dust of their feet over our heads." Rising up, he went to the foot of Sineru, abandoned that form, coiled seven times around Sineru with his coils, raised his hood above, and, turning his hood downward over the Tāvatiṃsa mansion, seized it and rendered it invisible.
Then Venerable Raṭṭhapāla said this to the Blessed One: "Venerable sir, formerly, standing in this place, I used to see Sineru, I used to see the surrounding ring of Sineru, I used to see Tāvatiṃsa, I used to see Vejayanta, I used to see the banner atop the Vejayanta palace. What, venerable sir, is the reason, what is the cause, that now I see neither Sineru … nor the banner atop the Vejayanta palace?" "Raṭṭhapāla, this nāga king named Nandopananda, angered at you all, has coiled seven times around Sineru with his coils, covered it above with his hood, and stands there, having made it dark." "I shall tame him, venerable sir." The Blessed One did not permit it. Then Venerable Bhaddiya, then Venerable Rāhula — thus, one after another, all the monks rose up to volunteer. The Blessed One did not permit any of them.
The Buddha's careful two-step reflection — first noticing that Nandopananda has come within the range of his knowledge at all, then specifically checking whether he has the "supporting condition" for conversion — models a discipline this treatise has shown before in other stories: even omniscient perception is not treated as automatically actionable; the Buddha deliberately investigates whether intervention is warranted before choosing to act, and only then identifies the specific person, Moggallāna, suited to the specific task.
Nandopananda's grievance is worth taking seriously on its own terms rather than dismissing as mere arrogance: from his perspective, the monks really were flying directly over his home and, by the logic of ritual purity that governs so much of this cosmology, genuinely defiling him and his court by passing dust-covered feet above their heads. The story does not deny that a real breach of decorum occurred — it simply shows that his violent response to it was disproportionate, and that his underlying wrong view made him unable to receive the Triple Gem's protection that might otherwise have tempered his reaction.
a supporting condition — the specific accumulated potential in a person's mental continuum that makes a particular teaching or intervention capable of bearing fruit, checked here by the Buddha before he decides to act on Nandopananda's case at all.
wrong view — micchā (wrong, false) + diṭṭhi (view); the specific obstacle identified in Nandopananda, referring to his lack of confidence in the Buddha, the Dhamma, and the Saṅgha, the underlying cause the entire episode exists to resolve.
the name of Sakka's own palace in the Tāvatiṃsa heaven — one of the specific landmarks Venerable Raṭṭhapāla notices has vanished from view, providing the story's concrete evidence that something has gone dramatically wrong.
The Taming of Nandopananda, Part Two: Smoke, Fire, and a Walk Through a Belly
Only when every other monk had volunteered and been refused did Mahāmoggallāna offer himself — and the Buddha immediately granted permission. What followed was an escalating contest fought entirely through transformation: Moggallāna matched the nāga's own enormous coiled form, pressed him against Sineru until both were smoking and then both blazing, entered his body through first one ear and out the other, then one nostril and out the other, and finally walked back and forth inside his belly after the nāga opened his mouth in a failed attempt to trap him between his fangs. The Buddha himself, watching from outside, warned Moggallāna that this was an unusually powerful nāga — to which the elder calmly replied that his four bases of power were so thoroughly perfected he could tame a hundred thousand such nāgas. When the defeated Nandopananda finally released a blast of poisonous breath in one last attempt to harm him, Moggallāna simply entered the fourth jhāna, and the wind could not so much as stir a single pore of his skin — at which point, taking the form of a garuḍa, the nāga's own natural predator, he pursued the terrified serpent to complete surrender.
Avasāne mahāmoggallānatthero "ahaṃ, bhante, damemi na"nti āha. "Damehi moggallānā"ti bhagavā anujāni. Thero attabhāvaṃ vijahitvā mahantaṃ nāgarājavaṇṇaṃ abhinimminitvā nandopanandaṃ cuddasakkhattuṃ bhogehi parikkhipitvā tassa phaṇamatthake attano phaṇaṃ ṭhapetvā sinerunā saddhiṃ abhinippīḷesi. Nāgarājā padhūmāyi. Theropi na tuyhaṃyeva sarīre dhūmo atthi, mayhampi atthīti padhūmāyi. Nāgarājassa dhūmo theraṃ na bādhati. Therassa pana dhūmo nāgarājānaṃ bādhati. Tato nāgarājā pajjali. Theropi na tuyhaṃyeva sarīre aggi atthi, mayhampi atthīti pajjali. Nāgarājassa tejo theraṃ na bādhati. Therassa pana tejo nāgarājānaṃ bādhati. Nāgarājā ayaṃ maṃ sinerunā abhinippīḷetvā dhūmāyati ceva pajjalati cāti cintetvā "bho tvaṃ kosī"ti paṭipucchi. "Ahaṃ kho, nanda, moggallāno"ti. "Bhante, attano bhikkhubhāvena tiṭṭhāhī"ti.
Thero taṃ attabhāvaṃ vijahitvā tassa dakkhiṇakaṇṇasotena pavisitvā vāmakaṇṇasotena nikkhami, vāmakaṇṇasotena pavisitvā dakkhiṇakaṇṇasotena nikkhami, tathā dakkhiṇanāsasotena pavisitvā vāmanāsasotena nikkhami, vāmanāsasotena pavisitvā dakkhiṇanāsasotena nikkhami. Tato nāgarājā mukhaṃ vivari. Thero mukhena pavisitvā antokucchiyaṃ pācīnena ca pacchimena ca caṅkamati. Bhagavā "moggallāna, manasikarohi mahiddhiko esa nāgo"ti āha. Thero "mayhaṃ kho, bhante, cattāro iddhipādā bhāvitā bahulīkatā yānīkatā vatthukatā anuṭṭhitā paricitā susamāraddhā, tiṭṭhatu, bhante, nandopanando, ahaṃ nandopanandasadisānaṃ nāgarājānaṃ satampi sahassampi satasahassampi dameyya"nti āha.
Nāgarājā cintesi "pavisanto tāva me na diṭṭho, nikkhamanakāle dāni naṃ dāṭhantare pakkhipitvā saṅkhādissāmī"ti cintetvā nikkhama bhante, mā maṃ antokucchiyaṃ aparāparaṃ caṅkamanto bādhayitthāti āha. Thero nikkhamitvā bahi aṭṭhāsi. Nāgarājā ayaṃ soti disvā nāsavātaṃ vissajji. Thero catutthaṃ jhānaṃ samāpajji. Lomakūpampissa vāto cāletuṃ nāsakkhi. Avasesā bhikkhū kira ādito paṭṭhāya sabbapāṭihāriyāni kātuṃ sakkuṇeyyuṃ, imaṃ pana ṭhānaṃ patvā evaṃ khippanisantino hutvā samāpajjituṃ na sakkhissantīti tesaṃ bhagavā nāgarājadamanaṃ nānujāni.
Nāgarājā "ahaṃ imassa samaṇassa nāsavātena lomakūpampi cāletuṃ nāsakkhiṃ, mahiddhiko samaṇo"ti cintesi. Thero attabhāvaṃ vijahitvā supaṇṇarūpaṃ abhinimminitvā supaṇṇavātaṃ dassento nāgarājānaṃ anubandhi. Nāgarājā taṃ attabhāvaṃ vijahitvā māṇavakavaṇṇaṃ abhinimminitvā "bhante, tumhākaṃ saraṇaṃ gacchāmī"ti vadanto therassa pāde vandi. Thero "satthā, nanda, āgato, ehi gamissāmā"ti nāgarājānaṃ damayitvā nibbisaṃ katvā gahetvā bhagavato santikaṃ agamāsi. Nāgarājā bhagavantaṃ vanditvā "bhante, tumhākaṃ saraṇaṃ gacchāmī"ti āha. Bhagavā "sukhī hohi, nāgarājā"ti vatvā bhikkhusaṅghaparivuto anāthapiṇḍikassa nivesanaṃ agamāsi.
Anāthapiṇḍiko "kiṃ, bhante, atidivā āgatatthā"ti āha. Moggallānassa ca nandopanandassa ca saṅgāmo ahosīti. Kassa, bhante, jayo, kassa parājayoti. Moggallānassa jayo, nandassa parājayoti. Anāthapiṇḍiko "adhivāsetu me, bhante, bhagavā sattāhaṃ ekapaṭipāṭiyā bhattaṃ, sattāhaṃ therassa sakkāraṃ karissāmī"ti vatvā sattāhaṃ buddhapamukhānaṃ pañcannaṃ bhikkhusatānaṃ mahāsakkāraṃ akāsi. Iti imaṃ imasmiṃ nandopanandadamane kataṃ mahantaṃ attabhāvaṃ sandhāyetaṃ vuttaṃ "yadā mahantaṃ attabhāvaṃ karoti, tadā mahantaṃ hoti mahāmoggallānattherassa viyā"ti. Evaṃ vuttepi bhikkhū upādiṇṇakaṃ nissāya anupādiṇṇakameva vaḍḍhatīti āhaṃsu. Ayameva cettha yutti.
At last, Elder Mahāmoggallāna said, "Venerable sir, I shall tame him." "Tame him, Moggallāna," the Blessed One permitted. The elder, abandoning his own form, created a huge nāga-king form, coiled fourteen times around Nandopananda with his coils, placed his own hood atop the nāga's hood, and pressed down together with Sineru. The nāga king began to smoke. The elder, thinking, "smoke is not only in your body — it is in mine too," also began to smoke. The nāga king's smoke did not trouble the elder; but the elder's smoke troubled the nāga king. Then the nāga king burst into flame. The elder, thinking, "fire is not only in your body — it is in mine too," also burst into flame. The nāga king's fire did not trouble the elder; but the elder's fire troubled the nāga king. The nāga king, thinking, "this one, having crushed me against Sineru, is both smoking and blazing," asked in return, "sir, who are you?" "Nanda, I am indeed Moggallāna." "Venerable sir, please remain in your own form as a monk."
The elder, abandoning that form, entered through the nāga's right ear-passage and exited through the left; entered through the left and exited through the right; likewise entered through the right nostril and exited through the left, entered through the left nostril and exited through the right. Then the nāga king opened his mouth. The elder, entering by the mouth, walked back and forth inside his belly, from east to west. The Blessed One said, "Moggallāna, be attentive — this nāga is very powerful." The elder said, "Venerable sir, my four bases of power have been developed, made much of, made a vehicle, made a basis, firmly established, consolidated, and properly undertaken. Let Nandopananda be, venerable sir — I could tame even a hundred, a thousand, a hundred thousand nāga kings like Nandopananda."
The nāga king thought, "I did not even see him enter; when he comes out now, I shall catch him between my fangs and crush him" — and, thinking this, said, "come out, venerable sir; do not trouble me by walking back and forth inside my belly." The elder came out and stood outside. The nāga king, seeing, "this is he," released a blast from his nostril. The elder entered the fourth jhāna. The wind could not even stir a single pore of his skin. It is said that, although the remaining monks might well have been capable of performing all these marvels up to this point, upon reaching this particular juncture, they would not have been quick-witted enough to enter the required attainment in time — and it was for this reason that the Blessed One did not permit any of them to tame the nāga king.
The nāga king thought, "I was unable, even with my own nostril's wind, to stir so much as a single pore of this ascetic — this ascetic is very powerful." The elder, abandoning his form, created the form of a garuḍa, and, displaying a garuḍa's wind, pursued the nāga king. The nāga king, abandoning his own form, created the form of a young brahmin, and, saying, "venerable sir, I go for refuge to you," paid homage at the elder's feet. The elder said, "Nanda, the Teacher has come; come, let us go" — and, having tamed the nāga king and rendered him free of venom, took him and went into the Blessed One's presence. The nāga king, paying homage to the Blessed One, said, "venerable sir, I go for refuge to you." The Blessed One, saying, "may you be well, nāga king," went, surrounded by the community of monks, to Anāthapiṇḍika's house.
Anāthapiṇḍika said, "Venerable sir, why have you come so unusually late?" "There was a battle between Moggallāna and Nandopananda." "Whose was the victory, venerable sir, and whose the defeat?" "Moggallāna's was the victory; Nanda's, the defeat." Anāthapiṇḍika said, "Venerable sir, may the Blessed One grant me the favor of accepting meals for seven days in unbroken succession; for seven days I shall render honor to the elder" — and, for seven days, he rendered great honor to the community of five hundred monks headed by the Buddha. Thus it is with reference to this great bodily form created during the taming of Nandopananda that it was said, "when he makes his body large, it becomes large, just as with Elder Mahāmoggallāna." Even though this was said, the monks maintained that it is the non-living part that grows in dependence on the living part. This, then, is the correct reasoning on this point.
The escalating duel — matching form for form, smoke for smoke, fire for fire, before Moggallāna finally simply enters the nāga's own body — traces a deliberate progression from confrontation to something closer to complete, almost intimate mastery: by the time Moggallāna is walking calmly back and forth inside the nāga's belly, the contest has already effectively ended; everything that follows is merely the nāga's own failing attempts to salvage some measure of the fight.
The Buddha's decision to withhold permission from every other volunteer until Moggallāna alone stepped forward directly illustrates this same chapter's earlier claim that "quick-wittedness" — the ability to enter the necessary attainment fast enough, under real pressure, to survive an actual crisis — is the rarest of all the qualities this whole path requires; the text states plainly that the other monks might have managed every step up to the poison-breath attack, but could not have reacted in time at the one moment that actually mattered.
a garuḍa, a mythical bird of prey — the traditional natural predator of nāgas, whose form Moggallāna finally assumes to complete Nandopananda's total psychological defeat.
rendered free of venom — nis- (without) + visa (poison); the specific state Moggallāna leaves the nāga king in before presenting him to the Buddha, a detail marking the taming as complete and safe.
"I go for refuge" — the standard formula of taking refuge in the Three Jewels, spoken here by Nandopananda both to Moggallāna and then again directly to the Buddha, marking his full conversion from wrong view.
Exercising Mastery With the Body, All the Way to the Brahmā-World
Returning from the Nandopananda narrative to systematic explanation, the chapter now addresses the final and most far-reaching application of the power of resolve: reaching the Brahmā-world itself and exercising bodily mastery there. The canonical formula lays out a complete toolkit of reciprocal transformations — far made near, near made far, much made little, little made much — before turning to the two distinct ways of actually traveling there: with a visible body, more slowly, by first bringing the mind under the body's influence, or with an invisible body, more swiftly, by instead bringing the body under the mind's influence. Both methods pass through the same threshold experience, entering a perception of pleasure and of lightness that leaves the traveling body as buoyant as a wisp of cotton-down caught on the wind. Only once there, creating a mind-made duplicate before the Brahmā to walk, stand, speak, and even hold conversation on the meditator's behalf, does the formula consider bodily mastery to be genuinely achieved.
Yāva brahmalokāpīti brahmalokampi paricchedaṃ katvā. Kāyena vasaṃ vattetīti tattha brahmaloke kāyena attano vasaṃ vatteti. Tassattho pāḷiṃ anugantvā veditabbo. Ayañhettha pāḷi –
"Yāva brahmalokāpi kāyena vasaṃ vattetīti. Sace so iddhimā cetovasippatto brahmalokaṃ gantukāmo hoti, dūrepi santike adhiṭṭhāti santike hotūti, santike hoti. Santikepi dūre adhiṭṭhāti dūre hotūti, dūre hoti. Bahukampi thokanti adhiṭṭhāti thokaṃ hotūti, thokaṃ hoti. Thokampi bahukanti adhiṭṭhāti bahukaṃ hotūti, bahukaṃ hoti. Dibbena cakkhunā tassa brahmuno rūpaṃ passati. Dibbāya sotadhātuyā tassa brahmuno saddaṃ suṇāti. Cetopariyañāṇena tassa brahmuno cittaṃ pajānāti. Sace so iddhimā cetovasippatto dissamānena kāyena brahmalokaṃ gantukāmo hoti, kāyavasena cittaṃ pariṇāmeti, kāyavasena cittaṃ adhiṭṭhāti, kāyavasena cittaṃ pariṇāmetvā kāyavasena cittaṃ adhiṭṭhahitvā sukhasaññañca lahusaññañca okkamitvā dissamānena kāyena brahmalokaṃ gacchati. Sace so iddhimā cetovasippatto adissamānena kāyena brahmalokaṃ gantukāmo hoti, cittavasena kāyaṃ pariṇāmeti, cittavasena kāyaṃ adhiṭṭhāti. Cittavasena kāyaṃ pariṇāmetvā cittavasena kāyaṃ adhiṭṭhahitvā sukhasaññañca lahusaññañca okkamitvā adissamānena kāyena brahmalokaṃ gacchati. So tassa brahmuno purato rūpaṃ abhinimmināti manomayaṃ sabbaṅgapañcaṅgiṃ ahīnindriyaṃ. Sace so iddhimā caṅkamati, nimmitopi tattha caṅkamati. Sace so iddhimā tiṭṭhati, nisīdati, seyyaṃ kappeti, nimmitopi tattha seyyaṃ kappeti. Sace so iddhimā dhūmāyati, pajjalati, dhammaṃ bhāsati, pañhaṃ pucchati, pañhaṃ puṭṭho vissajjeti, nimmitopi tattha pañhaṃ puṭṭho vissajjeti. Sace so iddhimā tena brahmunā saddhiṃ santiṭṭhati, sallapati, sākacchaṃ samāpajjati, nimmitopi tattha tena brahmunā saddhiṃ santiṭṭhati, sallapati, sākacchaṃ samāpajjati. Yaṃ yadeva hi so iddhimā karoti, taṃ tadeva nimmito karotī"ti (paṭi. ma. 3.12).
"Even as far as the Brahmā-world, he exercises mastery with the body": having made even the Brahmā-world its limit. "He exercises mastery with the body": there, in the Brahmā-world, he exercises his own mastery by means of the body. Its meaning should be understood by following the canonical text. Here is that canonical text —
"'Even as far as the Brahmā-world, he exercises mastery with the body': if this possessor of power, who has attained mastery of mind, wishes to go to the Brahmā-world, he determines what is far to be near, thinking, 'let it be near' — and it becomes near. He determines what is near to be far, thinking, 'let it be far' — and it becomes far. He determines what is much to be little, thinking, 'let it be little' — and it becomes little. He determines what is little to be much, thinking, 'let it be much' — and it becomes much. With the divine eye, he sees that Brahmā's form. With the divine ear-element, he hears that Brahmā's voice. With the knowledge of penetrating minds, he understands that Brahmā's mind. If this possessor of power, who has attained mastery of mind, wishes to go to the Brahmā-world with a visible body, he brings the mind under the influence of the body, he determines the mind by way of the body; having brought the mind under the body's influence and determined it by way of the body, entering into a perception of pleasure and a perception of lightness, he goes to the Brahmā-world with a visible body. If this possessor of power, who has attained mastery of mind, wishes to go to the Brahmā-world with an invisible body, he brings the body under the influence of the mind, he determines the body by way of the mind; having brought the body under the mind's influence and determined it by way of the mind, entering into a perception of pleasure and a perception of lightness, he goes to the Brahmā-world with an invisible body. He creates, in front of that Brahmā, a form, mind-made, complete with all its major and minor limbs, its faculties not deficient. If this possessor of power walks, the created form also walks there. If this possessor of power stands, sits, or lies down, the created form also lies down there. If this possessor of power smokes, blazes, speaks the Dhamma, asks a question, or, being asked a question, answers it, the created form, being asked a question there, also answers it. If this possessor of power stands together with that Brahmā, converses, or engages in discussion, the created form also stands together with that Brahmā there, converses, and engages in discussion. For whatever this possessor of power does, the created form does that very same thing.'" (Paṭis. iii.12)
The four reciprocal transformations opening this passage — far into near, near into far, much into little, little into much — establish a general principle before the specific case of Brahmā-world travel is even addressed: this power operates on the very categories of distance and quantity themselves, treating them as malleable relationships rather than fixed facts, and everything that follows (the journey itself, the mind-made duplicate) is simply a specific application of this same underlying flexibility.
The distinction between "bringing mind under body's influence" for visible travel and "bringing body under mind's influence" for invisible travel captures something genuinely subtle: visible travel is deliberately the slower, more physically grounded mode, since a body that remains visible to onlookers must still behave in a manner recognizably continuous with an ordinary body moving through space, while invisible travel, unconstrained by any need to look physically plausible to a witness, can simply be as fast as thought itself.
he brings the mind under the influence of the body — the method for visible travel, in which the mind is made to follow the body's own natural, physically continuous pace rather than moving independently of it.
he brings the body under the influence of the mind — the mirror-image method for invisible travel, in which the body instead follows the mind's own much swifter movement, unconstrained by ordinary physical continuity.
with faculties not deficient — a- (not) + hīna (deficient, lacking) + indriya (faculty); describing the mind-made duplicate created before the Brahmā as fully formed and complete in outward appearance, in every visible respect.
Making the Far Near: A Shortened Road, and a City Brought Close
The chapter now traces who first performed each of the four reciprocal transformations, grounding the abstract formula in specific, named precedent. The Buddha himself made the far near when he stepped from earth's surface directly onto the summit of Mount Sineru, treating the intervening Mount Yugandhara as a single stepping-stone. Mahāmoggallāna did the same when he compressed an entire thirty-league road so that a twelve-league procession of pilgrims arrived instantly. Centuries later in Sri Lanka, Elder Cūḷasamudda, needing to find almsfood for seven hundred monks during a famine, shortened the very earth itself to walk his community from Sri Lanka to distant Pāṭaliputta in a single stride — casually correcting his startled companions' sense of both distance and scale along the way — while Elder Tissadatta performed the identical feat merely to pay an evening visit to the Bodhi Tree. And the reverse transformation, making the near far, belongs to the Buddha alone: he deliberately lengthened the short distance between himself and the murderous Aṅgulimāla, keeping the bandit forever just out of reach as he pursued him on foot.
Tattha dūrepi santike adhiṭṭhātīti pādakajjhānato vuṭṭhāya dūre devalokaṃ vā brahmalokaṃ vā āvajjati santike hotūti. Āvajjitvā parikammaṃ katvā puna samāpajjitvā ñāṇena adhiṭṭhāti santike hotūti, santike hoti. Esa nayo sesapadesupi.
Tattha ko dūraṃ gahetvā santikaṃ akāsīti? Bhagavā. Bhagavā hi yamakapāṭihāriyāvasāne devalokaṃ gacchanto yugandharañca sineruñca santike katvā pathavītalato ekapādaṃ yugandhare patiṭṭhapetvā dutiyaṃ sinerumatthake ṭhapesi. Añño ko akāsi? Mahāmoggallānatthero. Thero hi sāvatthito bhattakiccaṃ katvā nikkhantaṃ dvādasayojanikaṃ parisaṃ tiṃsayojanaṃ saṅkassanagaramaggaṃ saṅkhipitvā taṅkhaṇaññeva sampāpesi.
Apica tambapaṇṇidīpe cūḷasamuddatthero pi akāsi. Dubbhikkhasamaye kira therassa santikaṃ pātova satta bhikkhusatāni āgamaṃsu. Thero "mahā bhikkhusaṅgho kuhiṃ bhikkhācāro bhavissatī"ti cintento sakalatambapaṇṇidīpe adisvā "paratīre pāṭaliputte bhavissatī"ti disvā bhikkhū pattacīvaraṃ gāhāpetvā "ethāvuso, bhikkhācāraṃ gamissāmā"ti pathaviṃ saṅkhipitvā pāṭaliputtaṃ gato. Bhikkhū "kataraṃ, bhante, imaṃ nagara"nti pucchiṃsu. Pāṭaliputtaṃ, āvusoti. Pāṭaliputtaṃ nāma dūre bhanteti. Āvuso, mahallakattherā nāma dūrepi gahetvā santike karontīti. Mahāsamuddo kuhiṃ, bhanteti? Nanu, āvuso, antarā ekaṃ nīlamātikaṃ atikkamitvā āgatatthāti? Āma, bhante. Mahāsamuddo pana mahantoti. Āvuso, mahallakattherā nāma mahantampi khuddakaṃ karontīti.
Yathā cāyaṃ, evaṃ tissadattatthero pi sāyanhasamaye nhāyitvā katuttarāsaṅgo mahābodhiṃ vandissāmīti citte uppanne santike akāsi.
Santikaṃ pana gahetvā ko dūramakāsīti? Bhagavā. Bhagavā hi attano ca aṅgulimālassa (ma. ni. 2.348) ca antaraṃ santikampi dūramakāsīti.
Herein, "he determines what is far to be near": emerging from the basis-jhāna, he adverts to a far-off deva-world or Brahmā-world, thinking, "let it be near." Having adverted, having performed the preliminary work, and having entered again, he determines by knowledge, "let it be near," and it becomes near. This same method applies to the remaining terms.
Herein, who took what was far and made it near? The Blessed One. For the Blessed One, going to the deva-world at the conclusion of the twin marvel, having brought Yugandhara and Sineru near, planted one foot on the surface of the earth and the other, set upon Yugandhara, on the summit of Sineru. Who else did this? Elder Mahāmoggallāna. For the elder, having shortened the thirty-league road to the city of Saṅkassa, brought the twelve-league procession — which had set out from Sāvatthī after finishing its meal — there in that very instant.
Moreover, on the island of Tambapaṇṇi, Elder Cūḷasamudda did this as well. It is told that, in a time of famine, seven hundred monks came to the elder early one morning. The elder, thinking, "where will there be almsfood for such a great community of monks?", and, seeing none in the whole of Tambapaṇṇi, saw, "there will be some on the far shore, in Pāṭaliputta." Having the monks take up their bowls and robes, saying, "come, friends, let us go on almsround," he shortened the earth, and went to Pāṭaliputta. The monks asked, "venerable sir, which city is this?" "Pāṭaliputta, friends." "But Pāṭaliputta is said to be far away, venerable sir." "Friends, senior elders bring even what is far and make it near." "But where, venerable sir, is the great ocean?" "Friends, did you not come here having just crossed a single dark stream in between?" "Yes, venerable sir." "But the great ocean is huge!" "Friends, senior elders make even what is huge into something small."
And just as this one, so too Elder Tissadatta, one evening, having bathed and put on his robe, when the thought arose in him, "I shall pay homage to the Great Bodhi Tree," made it near.
But who took what was near and made it far? The Blessed One. For the Blessed One made the space between himself and Aṅgulimāla far, even though it was near.
Cūḷasamudda's brief, almost deadpan exchange with his startled monks — "senior elders bring even what is far and make it near," and, moments later, "senior elders make even what is huge into something small" — treats an event of genuinely cosmic scale (crossing to a distant city, dismissing the ocean's vastness) with a striking matter-of-factness. The comedy of the scene depends entirely on the monks' ordinary astonishment being met with a teacher's calm, almost bureaucratic explanation, exactly the same tone found throughout this chapter's other stories of masters performing extraordinary feats as routine business.
The single, spare sentence given to the Buddha's use of the opposite transformation — lengthening, rather than shortening, the distance to Aṅgulimāla — carries an entire well-known story in miniature: the murderer, despite running at full speed, could never catch up to the walking Buddha, precisely because the Buddha kept the gap between them artificially wide, a detail whose deeper point (about the futility of pursuing salvation through force rather than sincere request) the text leaves entirely unstated, trusting the reader to already know it.
to shorten, compress, contract — the specific verb for the "far made near" transformation, used identically for Moggallāna's shortened road, Cūḷasamudda's compressed earth, and Tissadatta's instant approach to the Bodhi Tree.
a famine, scarcity of alms — dur- (bad, difficult) + bhikkhā (alms, food); the specific crisis motivating Cūḷasamudda's cross-continental almsround, grounding an extraordinary feat in an entirely ordinary, practical need.
"Garland of Fingers" — the notorious bandit-turned-disciple whose famous pursuit of the Buddha, kept perpetually out of reach despite running his fastest, is referenced here as the sole canonical example of the "near made far" transformation.
Making Much Into Little, Little Into Much — and Sour Into Sweet
The commentary now supplies precedent for the remaining pair of reciprocal transformations, much made little and little made much, before noting that the same power extends further still, to any quality a meditator wishes to alter. Elder Mahākassapa compressed five hundred girls' entire offering of moon-cakes into the volume of a single bowl. Elder Mahāmoggallāna, in the well-known story of the miser Illisa, performed the opposite feat, expanding a bare handful of food to satisfy an entire assembly. The Buddha himself did the same for the destitute Kākavaliya, multiplying one bowl of thin, sourish gruel to feed the whole monks' order and thereby setting in motion the very merit that would make Kākavaliya a wealthy man's heir within a week. And Elder Mahā-Anuḷa went further yet, showing that the power is not limited to quantity at all: he simply willed plain river water to become sweet ghee-cream for a group of monks who had managed to beg only dry, unappetizing rice.
Atha ko bahukaṃ thokaṃ akāsīti? Mahākassapatthero. Rājagahe kira nakkhattadivase pañcasatā kumāriyo candapūve gahetvā nakkhattakīḷanatthāya gacchantiyo bhagavantaṃ disvā kiñci nādaṃsu. Pacchato āgacchantaṃ pana theraṃ disvā amhākaṃ thero eti pūvaṃ dassāmāti sabbā pūve gahetvā theraṃ upasaṅkamiṃsu. Thero pattaṃ nīharitvā sabbaṃ ekapattapūramattamakāsi. Bhagavā theraṃ āgamayamāno purato nisīdi. Thero āharitvā bhagavato adāsi.
Illisaseṭṭhivatthusmiṃ pana mahāmoggallānatthero thokaṃ bahukamakāsi, kākavaliyavatthusmiñca bhagavā. Mahākassapatthero kira sattāhaṃ samāpattiyā vītināmetvā daliddasaṅgahaṃ karonto kākavaliyassa nāma duggatamanussassa gharadvāre aṭṭhāsi. Tassa jāyā theraṃ disvā patino pakkaṃ aloṇambilayāguṃ patte ākiri. Thero taṃ gahetvā bhagavato hatthe ṭhapesi. Bhagavā mahābhikkhusaṅghassa pahonakaṃ katvā adhiṭṭhāsi. Ekapattena ābhatā sabbesaṃ pahosi. Kākavaliyopi sattame divase seṭṭhiṭṭhānaṃ alatthāti.
Na kevalañca thokassa bahukaraṇaṃ, madhuraṃ amadhuraṃ, amadhuraṃ madhurantiādīsupi yaṃ yaṃ icchati, sabbaṃ iddhimato ijjhati. Tathā hi mahāanuḷatthero nāma sambahule bhikkhū piṇḍāya caritvā sukkhabhattameva labhitvā gaṅgātīre nisīditvā paribhuñjamāne disvā gaṅgāya udakaṃ sappimaṇḍanti adhiṭṭhahitvā sāmaṇerānaṃ saññaṃ adāsi. Te thālakehi āharitvā bhikkhusaṅghassa adaṃsu. Sabbe madhurena sappimaṇḍena bhuñjiṃsūti.
Now, who made much into little? Elder Mahākassapa. It is told that, in Rājagaha, on a festival day, five hundred young girls, carrying moon-cakes, were going out to play at the festival. Seeing the Blessed One, they offered him nothing at all. But seeing the elder coming behind him, thinking, "our own elder is coming — let us give him cakes," they all took up their cakes and approached the elder. The elder brought out his bowl, and made the whole of it fill just that one bowl. The Blessed One sat down in front, waiting for the elder. The elder brought it and gave it to the Blessed One.
But in the story of the merchant Illisa, it was Elder Mahāmoggallāna who made little into much, and in the story of Kākavaliya, it was the Blessed One. It is told that Elder Mahākassapa, having passed seven days in attainment and now going about caring for the poor, stood at the door of a destitute man named Kākavaliya. That man's wife, seeing the elder, poured into his bowl the unsalted, sour gruel cooked for her husband. The elder took it and set it in the Blessed One's hands. The Blessed One determined it to be sufficient for the great community of monks. Brought in a single bowl, it sufficed for them all. And Kākavaliya himself, on the seventh day, obtained the position of a merchant's heir.
And it is not only the making of little into much: whatever a possessor of power wishes — turning sweet into unsweet, unsweet into sweet, and so on — all of it is accomplished for him. So it was that Elder Mahā-Anuḷa, seeing a number of monks who, having gone for alms, had obtained only dry, plain food, sitting on the bank of the Ganges and eating it, determined the water of the Ganges to be a cream of ghee, and gave a sign to the novices. They brought it in bowls and gave it to the community of monks. All of them ate it as sweet ghee-cream.
The Mahākassapa cake story carries a quiet sting easily missed on a first reading: the five hundred girls give nothing at all to the Buddha as he passes, and only afterward decide to give everything to the elder walking behind him. Nothing in the text corrects or comments on this — it simply records the girls' own preference, and lets the elder's power (compressing a bowl-defying mountain of cakes into a single almsbowl) do all the narrative work instead.
Placing the Kākavaliya story directly against the Illisa story makes the underlying principle unmistakable: the very same feat — making a small amount of food serve many people — is performed once by Moggallāna and once by the Buddha, in two entirely different social settings (a miser's stinginess exposed, a destitute man's poverty relieved), showing that the power itself is a fixed tool, applied by different masters to whatever situation calls for it.
caring for the poor, support of the destitute — dalidda (poor) + saṅgaha (gathering in, support); the specific charitable practice Mahākassapa was engaged in when he encountered Kākavaliya's household.
unsalted, sour rice-gruel — a- (without) + loṇa (salt) + ambila (sour) + yāgu (gruel); the meager, unappetizing food that becomes, through the Buddha's determination, sufficient for the entire monastic community.
the cream or essence of ghee — sappi (ghee) + maṇḍa (cream, the finest part); what plain river water is determined to become in Mahā-Anuḷa's story, illustrating that this power extends to quality and flavor, not only quantity and distance.
Cotton-Down on the Wind: What "Bodily Mastery" Actually Requires
Having supplied precedent for every clause of the canonical formula, the commentary now works through it phrase by phrase — clarifying that seeing, hearing, and reading a distant Brahmā's mind require no travel at all, simply an expansion of one's own divine faculties from where one already sits. It then distinguishes the two travel methods with unusual technical precision: bringing mind under body's influence yields the slower, "body-following" gait of ordinary walking or flight along a self-created path; bringing body under mind's influence yields a swiftness limited only by thought itself, arriving in the very instant of the determining mind, whether at its arising, its persisting, or its passing away. Both methods pass through the same doorway, a perception of pleasure and lightness that leaves the body genuinely as buoyant as cotton-down flung on the wind. The passage closes with the commentary's own final, precise ruling on what actually counts as "bodily mastery" in the Brahmā-world: not the divine-eye seeing, not the divine-ear hearing, not even standing and conversing with the Brahmā from where one already sits — only the actual creation of the mind-made duplicate, standing before the Brahmā and acting in every particular exactly as the meditator himself acts, satisfies the formula's full demand.
Dibbena cakkhunāti idheva ṭhito ālokaṃ vaḍḍhetvā tassa brahmuno rūpaṃ passati. Idheva ca ṭhito sabbaṃ tassa bhāsato saddaṃ suṇāti. Cittaṃ pajānāti. Kāyavasena cittaṃ pariṇāmetīti karajakāyassa vasena cittaṃ pariṇāmeti. Pādakajjhānacittaṃ gahetvā kāye āropeti. Kāyānugatikaṃ karoti dandhagamanaṃ. Kāyagamanaṃ hi dandhaṃ hoti. Sukhasaññañca lahusaññañca okkamatīti pādakajjhānārammaṇena iddhicittena sahajātaṃ sukhasaññañca lahusaññañca okkamati pavisati phasseti sampāpuṇāti. Sukhasaññā nāma upekkhāsampayuttasaññā. Upekkhā hi santaṃ sukhanti vuttā. Sāyeva ca saññā nīvaraṇehi ceva vitakkādīhi paccanīkehi ca vimuttattā lahusaññātipi veditabbā. Taṃ okkantassa panassa karajakāyopi tūlapicu viya sallahuko hoti. So evaṃ vāyukkhittatūlapicunā viya sallahukena dissamānena kāyena brahmalokaṃ gacchati. Evaṃ gacchanto ca sace icchati pathavīkasiṇavasena ākāse maggaṃ nimminitvā padasā gacchati. Sace icchati vāyokasiṇavasena vāyuṃ adhiṭṭhahitvā tūlapicu viya vāyunā gacchati. Apica gantukāmatā eva ettha pamāṇaṃ. Sati hi gantukāmatāya evaṃ katacittādhiṭṭhāno adhiṭṭhānavegukkhittova so issāsakhittasaro viya dissamāno gacchati.
Cittavasena kāyaṃ pariṇāmetīti kāyaṃ gahetvā citte āropeti. Cittānugatikaṃ karoti sīghagamanaṃ. Cittagamanaṃ hi sīghaṃ hoti. Sukhasaññañca lahusaññañca okkamatīti rūpakāyārammaṇena iddhicittena sahajātaṃ sukhasaññañca lahusaññañca okkamatīti. Sesaṃ vuttanayeneva veditabbaṃ. Idaṃ pana cittagamanameva hoti. Evaṃ adissamānena kāyena gacchanto panāyaṃ kiṃ tassa adhiṭṭhānacittassa uppādakkhaṇe gacchati, udāhu ṭhitikkhaṇe bhaṅgakkhaṇe vāti vutte tīsupi khaṇesu gacchatīti thero āha. Kiṃ pana so sayaṃ gacchati nimmitaṃ pesetīti. Yathāruci karoti. Idha panassa sayaṃ gamanameva āgataṃ.
Manomayanti adhiṭṭhānamanena nimmitattā manomayaṃ. Ahīnindriyanti idaṃ cakkhusotādīnaṃ saṇṭhānavasena vuttaṃ. Nimmitarūpe pana pasādo nāma natthi. Sace iddhimā caṅkamati nimmitopi tattha caṅkamatītiādi sabbaṃ sāvakanimmitaṃ sandhāya vuttaṃ. Buddhanimmito pana yaṃ yaṃ bhagavā karoti, taṃ tampi karoti. Bhagavato rucivasena aññampi karotīti. Ettha ca yaṃ so iddhimā idheva ṭhito dibbena cakkhunā rūpaṃ passati, dibbāya sotadhātuyā saddaṃ suṇāti, cetopariyañāṇena cittaṃ pajānāti, na ettāvatā kāyena vasaṃ vatteti. Yampi so idheva ṭhito tena brahmunā saddhiṃ santiṭṭhati sallapati sākacchaṃ samāpajjati, ettāvatāpi na kāyena vasaṃ vatteti. Yampissa dūrepi santike adhiṭṭhātītiādikaṃ adhiṭṭhānaṃ, ettāvatāpi na kāyena vasaṃ vatteti. Yampi so dissamānena vā adissamānena vā kāyena brahmalokaṃ gacchati, ettāvatāpi na kāyena vasaṃ vatteti. Yañca kho so tassa brahmuno purato rūpaṃ abhinimminātītiādinā nayena vuttavidhānaṃ āpajjati, ettāvatā kāyena vasaṃ vatteti nāmaṃ. Sesaṃ panettha kāyena vasaṃ vattanāya pubbabhāgadassanatthaṃ vuttanti ayaṃ tāva adhiṭṭhānā iddhi.
"With the divine eye": standing right here, having expanded his light, he sees that Brahmā's form. And standing right here, he hears the whole of that one's speaking voice. He understands his mind. "He brings the mind under the influence of the body": he brings the mind under the influence of the physical, kamma-born body. Taking hold of the basis-jhāna mind, he mounts it upon the body, making it follow the body, a slow going — for going by way of the body is slow. "He enters into a perception of pleasure and a perception of lightness": he enters, penetrates, touches, and attains a perception of pleasure and a perception of lightness that arises together with the power-consciousness that has the basis-jhāna as its object. "Perception of pleasure" is the perception associated with equanimity — for equanimity is called "peaceful pleasure." And that same perception, precisely because it is freed from both the hindrances and their opposing factors such as thinking, should also be understood as "perception of lightness." When he has entered into it, his kamma-born body too becomes as light as a wisp of cotton-down. In this way, light as a wisp of cotton-down flung up by the wind, he goes to the Brahmā-world with a visible body. Going in this way, if he wishes, by means of the earth-kasiṇa, he creates a path in the sky and goes on foot. If he wishes, by means of the wind-kasiṇa, he determines the wind and, like a wisp of cotton-down, goes by the wind. But indeed, here, the sheer wish to go is itself the measure — for once there is the wish to go, having thus made the mind's determination, propelled by the force of that determination, he goes, visible, just like an arrow shot by an archer.
"He brings the body under the influence of the mind": he takes hold of the body and mounts it upon the mind, making it follow the mind, a swift going — for going by way of the mind is swift. "He enters into a perception of pleasure and a perception of lightness": he enters into a perception of pleasure and a perception of lightness that arises together with the power-consciousness that has the physical body as its object. The rest should be understood in the way already stated. But this is purely a going by way of mind. As for one who goes in this way with an invisible body — does he go at the moment of the arising of that determining consciousness, or at the moment of its persisting, or at the moment of its dissolution? The elder said: he goes at all three moments. But does he go himself, or does he send a created form? He does as he pleases. But here, it is his own going that is intended.
"Mind-made": mind-made because it is created by the determining mind. "Faculties not deficient": this is said with reference to the outward shape of the eye, the ear, and so on — for in the created form there is no actual sensitivity. "If the possessor of power walks, the created form also walks there" and so on — all of this is said with reference to a disciple's created form. But a created form made by the Buddha does whatever the Blessed One does, and, according to the Blessed One's own wish, does other things besides. And here: that this possessor of power, standing right here, sees the form with the divine eye, hears the sound with the divine ear-element, and understands the mind with the knowledge of penetrating minds — by this much alone he does not yet exercise mastery with the body. That he, standing right here, stands together with that Brahmā, converses, and engages in discussion — by this much alone, too, he does not yet exercise mastery with the body. That determination of his, "he determines what is far to be near" and so on — by this much alone, too, he does not yet exercise mastery with the body. That he goes to the Brahmā-world with a visible or an invisible body — by this much alone, too, he does not yet exercise mastery with the body. But that he arrives at the procedure stated in the manner, "he creates, in front of that Brahmā, a form" and so on — by this much, he is said to exercise mastery with the body. The remainder here is stated for the purpose of showing the preliminary portion leading up to the exercise of bodily mastery. This, firstly, is the power of resolve.
The commentary's closing ruling is a striking act of definitional narrowing: after cataloguing an entire sequence of extraordinary feats — seeing across worlds, hearing across worlds, reading minds at a distance, even conversing with a Brahmā without leaving one's seat — it declares that none of this actually counts as "bodily mastery." Only the single, final act of manifesting a mind-made duplicate that walks, stands, and speaks exactly as the meditator does satisfies the formula. Everything else, however impressive, is filed under "preliminary portion" (pubbabhāga) — a reminder that this text consistently defines a power by its most demanding, most precisely specified instance, not by any of its more easily achieved approximations.
The three-moment analysis of when exactly the invisible-body traveler arrives — at the arising, persisting, or dissolving of the determining thought-moment — pushes Abhidhamma's already fine-grained analysis of consciousness to a genuinely strange edge case, and the elder's answer ("all three") refuses to resolve the strangeness by picking just one; travel by mind, it turns out, cannot be pinned to a single instant of ordinary temporal experience at all.
the kamma-born physical body — kaja (born, produced) + kāya (body), with the intensive prefix kara-; the ordinary material body as distinguished from the mind-made duplicate later created before the Brahmā.
perception associated with equanimity — the technical Abhidhamma identification of "perception of pleasure" in this context, since the fourth jhāna's equanimity is itself classified as a subtle, peaceful form of pleasure rather than an absence of feeling.
the preliminary portion, the prior part — pubba (prior) + bhāga (portion, share); the commentary's technical term for every impressive-seeming step (seeing, hearing, conversing, traveling) that precedes but does not itself constitute the formula's actual criterion of bodily mastery.
The Power of Transformation: Becoming Child, Nāga, Lion, or Army
Paragraph 398 turns to the second of the ten kinds of iddhi listed earlier in the chapter, the power of transformation, and immediately distinguishes it from the mind-made-body power still to come: transformation means actually setting aside one's own ordinary appearance and displaying another form entirely — a child, a nāga, a garuḍa, an asura, a deva, a Brahmā, the ocean, a mountain, a lion, a tiger, a leopard, or the outward show of elephants, horses, chariots, foot-soldiers, and whole battle-formations. The method mirrors the power of resolve exactly: emerging from the kasiṇa-based basis-jhāna, adverting to the desired form, performing the preliminary work, then re-entering and determining, "let me be such a one" — whereupon the transformation occurs together with the determining thought itself. A single, understated reference names Devadatta as an example of this very power turned to harmful ends, a story the reader is assumed already to know in full from the Cūḷavagga.
Vikubbanāya pana manomayāya ca idaṃ nānākaraṇaṃ. Vikubbanaṃ tāva karontena "so pakativaṇṇaṃ vijahitvā kumārakavaṇṇaṃ vā dasseti, nāgavaṇṇaṃ vā dasseti, supaṇṇavaṇṇaṃ vā dasseti, asuravaṇṇaṃ vā dasseti, indavaṇṇaṃ vā dasseti, devavaṇṇaṃ vā dasseti, brahmavaṇṇaṃ vā dasseti, samuddavaṇṇaṃ vā dasseti, pabbatavaṇṇaṃ vā dasseti, sīhavaṇṇaṃ vā dasseti, byagghavaṇṇaṃ vā dasseti, dīpivaṇṇaṃ vā dasseti, hatthimpi dasseti, assampi dasseti, rathampi dasseti, pattimpi dasseti, vividhampi senābyūhaṃ dassetī"ti (paṭi. ma. 3.13) evaṃ vuttesu kumārakavaṇṇādīsu yaṃ yaṃ ākaṅkhati, taṃ taṃ adhiṭṭhātabbaṃ. Adhiṭṭhahantena ca pathavīkasiṇādīsu aññatarārammaṇato abhiññāpādakajjhānato vuṭṭhāya attano kumārakavaṇṇo āvajjitabbo. Āvajjitvā parikammāvasāne puna samāpajjitvā vuṭṭhāya evarūpo nāma kumārako homīti adhiṭṭhātabbaṃ. Saha adhiṭṭhānacittena kumārako hoti devadatto viya (cūḷava. 333). Esa nayo sabbattha.
Hatthimpi dassetītiādi panettha bahiddhāpi hatthiādidassanavasena vuttaṃ. Tattha hatthī homīti anadhiṭṭhahitvā hatthī hotūti adhiṭṭhātabbaṃ, assādīsupi eseva nayoti. Ayaṃ vikubbanā iddhi.
But there is this difference between the power of transformation and the power of the mind-made body. As for one performing transformation, first: "he, abandoning his natural appearance, shows the appearance of a child, or shows the appearance of a nāga, or shows the appearance of a garuḍa, or shows the appearance of an asura, or shows the appearance of Sakka, or shows the appearance of a deva, or shows the appearance of a Brahmā, or shows the appearance of the ocean, or shows the appearance of a mountain, or shows the appearance of a lion, or shows the appearance of a tiger, or shows the appearance of a leopard; he shows an elephant, he shows a horse, he shows a chariot, he shows a foot-soldier, and he shows a manifold arrangement of an army" (Paṭis. iii.13) — thus, among the appearances stated, such as that of a child, whichever one he wishes for should be determined. And, in determining, having emerged from the basis-jhāna for direct knowledge with any one object among the earth-kasiṇa and the rest, he should advert to the appearance of a child for himself. Having adverted, at the end of the preliminary work, having entered again and emerged, he should determine, "let me be a child of such a kind." Together with the determining consciousness, he becomes a child — just as Devadatta did (Cūḷavagga 333). This same method applies throughout.
Herein, "he shows an elephant" and so on is stated with reference to showing an elephant and the rest externally, apart from himself. Here, without determining, "let me become an elephant," one should determine, "let there be an elephant." The same method applies with a horse and the rest. This is the power of transformation.
The Devadatta reference is deliberately terse, a single subordinate clause ("just as Devadatta did") pointing to a story every reader of the Cūḷavagga would already know in full: Devadatta's use of this very power to transform himself into a child seated on Ajātasattu's lap, terrifying the prince into loyalty, as the opening move in his campaign against the Buddha. The commentary's restraint here is notable — it cites the case purely as a technical illustration of the mechanism, without pausing to moralize on its famously disastrous outcome, trusting the reader to supply that context unprompted.
The distinction drawn between transforming oneself ("let me be a child") and manifesting something external to oneself ("let there be an elephant") is a small but important clarification: the same underlying power branches into two grammatically and functionally distinct determinations, one reflexive and one not, depending on whether the meditator's own identity or a wholly separate object is being called into being.
transformation, metamorphosis — the second of the ten kinds of iddhi, defined by abandoning one's natural appearance and displaying another form entirely, as opposed to creating a separate, additional mind-made body.
a battle-array, military formation — senā (army) + byūha (arrangement, array); one of the more elaborate displays listed among the transformation power's possible manifestations.
one's natural, ordinary appearance — pakati (nature, ordinary state) + vaṇṇa (color, appearance); precisely what is set aside, abandoned (vijahitvā), at the moment the power of transformation is exercised.
The Mind-Made Body: Reed From Muñja-Grass, Sword From Scabbard
The chapter's final technical topic, paragraph 399, explains the power of the mind-made body through three linked similes drawn directly from the Paṭisambhidāmagga. The meditator first determines his own body to become hollow, then, within that hollow body, determines a second body to arise — and draws it out exactly as one draws a reed from a stalk of muñja-grass, a sword from its scabbard, or a snake from its slough: two things that appeared identical and inseparable, revealed to have been genuinely distinct all along. The commentary's own closing note on these similes is precise about their purpose — they are meant to show only that the mind-made form resembles the meditator himself, not that a literal husk is discarded in producing it. With this power explained, the treatise reaches its formal close: the traditional colophon marking the twelfth chapter, "Discussion of the Kinds of Supernormal Power," complete.
Manomayaṃ kātukāmo pana pādakajjhānato vuṭṭhāya kāyaṃ tāva āvajjitvā vuttanayeneva susiro hotūti adhiṭṭhāti, susiro hoti. Athassa abbhantare aññaṃ kāyaṃ āvajjitvā parikammaṃ katvā vuttanayeneva adhiṭṭhāti, tassa abbhantare añño kāyo hotūti. So taṃ muñjamhā īsikaṃ viya kosiyā asiṃ viya karaṇḍāya ahiṃ viya ca abbāhati. Tena vuttaṃ "idha bhikkhu imamhā kāyā aññaṃ kāyaṃ abhinimmināti rūpiṃ manomayaṃ sabbaṅgapaccaṅgiṃ ahīnindriyaṃ. Seyyathāpi puriso muñjamhā īsikaṃ pavāheyya, tassa evamassa ayaṃ muñjo ayaṃ īsikā, añño muñjo aññā īsikā, muñjamhātveva īsikā pavāḷhā"tiādi (paṭi. ma. 3.14). Ettha ca yathā īsikādayo muñjādīhi sadisā honti, evaṃ manomayarūpaṃ iddhimatāsadisameva hotīti dassanatthaṃ etā upamā vuttāti. Ayaṃ manomayā iddhi.
Iti sādhujanapāmojjatthāya kate visuddhimagge
Iddhividhaniddeso nāma
Dvādasamo paricchedo.
But one wishing to make a mind-made body, having emerged from the basis-jhāna, first adverts to his body and determines, in the way already stated, "let it become hollow" — and it becomes hollow. Then, having adverted to another body within it, and having done the preliminary work, he determines in the way already stated, "let there be, within that one, another body." He draws that one out just as one draws a reed from muñja-grass, a sword from its scabbard, or a snake from its slough. Hence it was said: "Here, a monk creates, from this body, another body, possessing form, mind-made, complete with all its major and minor limbs, its faculties not deficient. It is just as if a man were to draw out a reed from muñja-grass; it would occur to him: 'this is the muñja-grass, this is the reed — the muñja-grass is one thing, the reed is another thing, but the reed was drawn out from the muñja-grass'" and so on (Paṭis. iii.14). And here, just as the reed and the other examples are similar in kind to the muñja-grass and the rest, so too the mind-made form is simply similar in kind to the possessor of power himself — these similes are stated for the purpose of showing just this. This is the power of the mind-made body.
Thus, in the Path of Purification, composed for the joy of good people,
the discussion called "The Discussion of the Kinds of Supernormal Power"
constitutes the twelfth chapter.
All three similes — reed from muñja-grass, sword from scabbard, snake from slough — share a single precise logical structure worth noticing: in each case, two things that appeared to be one continuous thing are shown, by the act of separation itself, to have always been genuinely two things wearing the shape of one. The commentary's closing clarification is important precisely because it heads off a natural misreading: nothing is being discarded or shed the way a scabbard is set aside once the sword is drawn. The point of the simile is resemblance in form between original and created body, not the mechanics of extraction.
The chapter's closing colophon, naming this the twelfth chapter, marks the treatise's own internal transition into what its source manuscript calls the "Second Part" (Dutiyo bhāgo) — even as, within the treatise's own three-fold structure of virtue, concentration, and wisdom, this chapter and the next belong to the concluding portion of the concentration division, immediately preceding the turn toward wisdom that begins in earnest a few chapters later.
hollow — the intermediate state the meditator's own body is first determined into, a necessary preliminary step before a second body can be drawn out from within it.
muñja-grass and the reed drawn from it — the first of the chapter's three similes for the mind-made body's relationship to its source, chosen because the reed and the grass sheath around it look identical from outside despite being genuinely separate things.
"The Discussion of the Kinds of Supernormal Power" — the formal title of this twelfth chapter, as fixed in its own closing colophon; iddhi (power) + vidha (kind, sort) + niddesa (exposition, discussion).
Iddhividhaniddesa Complete
With the power of the mind-made body explained, the twelfth chapter of the Visuddhimagga comes to its close — the opening chapter of the source manuscript's own "second part" (Dutiyo bhāgo), even as it continues, within the treatise's own three-fold sīla–samādhi–paññā structure, straight on from the concentration division that chapter eleven completed. Beginning from the etymology of "iddhi" itself and the sober warning that mastery of these powers is rare even among those who possess all the necessary jhāna attainments, the chapter moved through the sole detailed treatment of the power of resolve — its four grounds, four bases, eight footings, and sixteen roots of imperturbability — into a long sequence of concrete demonstrations: Cūḷapanthaka's thousand-fold multiplication, the descent from Tāvatiṃsa with its triple staircase, the taming of the nāga king Nandopananda, and finally the exercises of passing through solid matter, diving through earth, walking on water, flying, and touching the sun and moon. It closed by tracing the more restrained but equally precise powers of transformation and mind-made duplication, before their final application in reaching, and moving with mastery through, the Brahmā-world itself.
The next chapter, the Abhiññāniddesa ("Discussion of the Direct Knowledges"), verified from the Visuddhimagga's own table of contents, opens the treatise's second volume by returning to the remaining five of the six direct knowledges introduced at this chapter's outset — the divine ear, penetration of others' minds, recollection of past lives, the divine eye, and the destruction of the taints — each of which iddhividha, the supernormal power just completed, was itself only the first and most elaborately treated member.