Fascicle 133 · 阿毘達磨大毘婆沙論卷第一百三十三 · Complete

The End and Rebirth of Worlds

Fascicle 133 explains why earth alone can never become a world-ending calamity, the precise mechanics and rhythm of universal destruction by fire, water, and wind, the re-formation of Mount Sumeru out of total emptiness, and closes with a loving description of Śakra's celestial city, Sudarśana, and its wish-granting tree. This page carries Ru-Yi's complete translation.

Translator: Ru-Yi Meditation Center Status: fascicle 133 complete, 16 sections Source: Taishō T1545, vol. 27, fascicle 133 Topic: 大種蘊第五 → 緣納息第二之三 continues (the Great Elements Aggregate; the Condition Nyāsa, continued)

Translation Method

The Chinese source is Xuánzàng's seventh-century translation of the Abhidharma-mahāvibhāṣā-śāstra (阿毘達磨大毘婆沙論), preserved in the Taishō canon (T1545, vol. 27) via the CBETA digital edition — public domain text, translated directly from the Chinese. The English wording throughout is Ru-Yi's own, and the reading notes are original, grounded in standard Sarvāstivāda scholarship rather than a specific named commentator's lecture transcript.

Fascicle 133 continues the Condition Nyāsa (緣納息第二之三). Terms established across fascicles 93–132 recur here and are not re-explained at each occurrence.

Classical text is set in the left-hand column below, our English in the right.

1. Completing the Realm-Condition Catalog: Desire Realm Meets Form Realm

Fascicle 133 opens by completing the exhaustive condition-catalog begun in the previous fascicle, now cross-tabulating desire-realm-bound and form-realm-bound great elements and derived form through every pairwise combination — before turning to a tetralemma on whether desire-realm-bound form is always produced by desire-realm-bound great elements, uncovering a subtle exception: certain undefiled, "unbound" accompanying forms, tied to no realm at all, can still be produced by desire-realm elements when their practitioner happens to have a desire-realm body.

Chinese Source

大種蘊第五中緣納息第二之三欲界繫大種與欲界繫大種為幾緣。答因。增上。因者二因。謂俱有。同類。俱生互相望為俱有因。前生與後生為同類因。增上者。

Ru-Yi Translation

Fifth Aggregate, the Great Elements: the Condition Nyāsa, Chapter Two, Part Three. With how many conditions do desire-realm-bound great elements relate to desire-realm-bound great elements? Answer: causal-condition, and predominant-condition. As to causal-condition: this is of two kinds — co-existent and same-class cause. Elements arising together, mutually compared, serve as co-existent cause; elements arising earlier and later serve as same-class cause. As to predominant-condition:

謂不礙生。及唯無障。欲界繫大種與欲界繫所造色。為幾緣。答因。增上。因者五因。謂生因。依因。立因。持因。養因。增上者如前說。欲界繫所造色與欲界繫所造色為幾緣。答因。增上。因者二因。謂同類。異熟。增上者如前說。欲界繫所造色與欲界繫大種為幾緣。答因。增上。因者一因。謂異熟。增上者如前說。

— this means not obstructing arising, or merely being without hindrance. With how many conditions do desire-realm-bound great elements relate to desire-realm-bound derived form? Answer: causal-condition, and predominant-condition. As to causal-condition: this is of five kinds — the generative, dependent, establishing, sustaining, and nourishing causes. As to predominant-condition: as explained before. With how many conditions does desire-realm-bound derived form relate to desire-realm-bound derived form? Answer: causal-condition, and predominant-condition. As to causal-condition: this is of two kinds — same-class and ripening cause. As to predominant-condition: as explained before. With how many conditions does desire-realm-bound derived form relate to desire-realm-bound great elements? Answer: causal-condition, and predominant-condition. As to causal-condition: this is of one kind only — ripening-cause. As to predominant-condition: as explained before.

欲界繫大種與色界繫大種為幾緣。答一增上。增上義如前說。色界繫大種與色界繫大種為幾緣答因。增上。因者二因。謂俱有。同類。增上者如前說。色界繫大種與欲界繫大種為幾緣。答一增上。

With how many conditions do desire-realm-bound great elements relate to form-realm-bound great elements? Answer: predominant-condition alone, its meaning as explained before. With how many conditions do form-realm-bound great elements relate to form-realm-bound great elements? Answer: causal-condition, and predominant-condition. As to causal-condition: this is of two kinds — co-existent and same-class cause. As to predominant-condition: as explained before. With how many conditions do form-realm-bound great elements relate to desire-realm-bound great elements? Answer: predominant-condition alone,

增上義如前說。

— its meaning as explained before.

欲界繫大種與色界繫所造色為幾緣。答一增上。增上義如前說。色界繫所造色與色界繫所造色為幾緣。答因。增上。因者三因。謂俱有。同類。異熟。增上者如前說。色界繫所造色與欲界繫大種。為幾緣。答一增上。增上義如前說。

With how many conditions do desire-realm-bound great elements relate to form-realm-bound derived form? Answer: predominant-condition alone, its meaning as explained before. With how many conditions does form-realm-bound derived form relate to form-realm-bound derived form? Answer: causal-condition, and predominant-condition. As to causal-condition: this is of three kinds — co-existent, same-class, and ripening cause. As to predominant-condition: as explained before. With how many conditions does form-realm-bound derived form relate to desire-realm-bound great elements? Answer: predominant-condition alone, its meaning as explained before.

Reading note — Ru-Yi

That an undefiled dharma, belonging to no realm whatsoever in its own right, can still be produced by realm-bound great elements shows how carefully this taxonomy separates a dharma's own moral or soteriological status from the merely physical question of what body currently houses it — liberation and location turn out to be entirely independent axes, one never determining the other.

2. Is All Desire-Realm Form Really Made by Desire-Realm Elements? Two Careful Exceptions

The same tetralemma repeats for form-realm-bound form and its own great elements, again surfacing an exception: unbound, undefiled accompanying form tied to the path itself can be produced by form-realm elements without itself belonging to the form realm. A parallel exhaustive analysis for past, present, and future form and their respective great elements follows, working out with precision exactly which time period's elements can produce form belonging to which other time period.

Chinese Source

欲界繫所造色與色界繫大種為幾緣。答一增上。增上義如前說。色界繫大種與欲界繫所造色為幾緣。答一增上。增上義如前說。欲界繫所造色與色界繫所造色為幾緣。答一增上。增上義如前說。色界繫所造色與欲界繫所造色為幾緣。答一增上。增上義如前說。色界繫大種與色界繫所造色為幾緣。答因。增上。因者五因。謂生等五。增上者如前說。色界繫所造色與色界繫大種為幾緣。答因。增上。因者一因。謂異熟因。增上者如前說。諸色欲界繫。彼色一切欲界繫大種所造耶。答應作四句。有色欲界繫。非欲界繫大種所造。謂欲界繫大種。以諸大種非所造故。有色欲界繫大種所造。非欲界繫。謂色不繫欲界繫大種所造。此復云何。謂一切法智品隨轉色。及依欲界身現前類智品隨轉色有色欲界繫。欲界繫大種所造。

Ru-Yi Translation

With how many conditions does desire-realm-bound derived form relate to form-realm-bound great elements? Answer: predominant-condition alone, its meaning as explained before. With how many conditions do form-realm-bound great elements relate to desire-realm-bound derived form? Answer: predominant-condition alone, its meaning as explained before. With how many conditions does desire-realm-bound derived form relate to form-realm-bound derived form? Answer: predominant-condition alone, its meaning as explained before. With how many conditions does form-realm-bound derived form relate to desire-realm-bound derived form? Answer: predominant-condition alone, its meaning as explained before. With how many conditions do form-realm-bound great elements relate to form-realm-bound derived form? Answer: causal-condition, and predominant-condition. As to causal-condition: this is of five kinds — the generative and the other four. As to predominant-condition: as explained before. With how many conditions does form-realm-bound derived form relate to form-realm-bound great elements? Answer: causal-condition, and predominant-condition. As to causal-condition: this is of one kind only — ripening-cause. As to predominant-condition: as explained before. Is every instance of desire-realm-bound form produced by desire-realm-bound great elements? Answer: a tetralemma should be constructed. There is desire-realm-bound form not produced by desire-realm-bound great elements — namely, the desire-realm-bound great elements themselves, since the great elements are never themselves produced. There is form produced by desire-realm-bound great elements that is not itself desire-realm-bound — namely, unbound form produced by desire-realm-bound great elements. What is this, more precisely? It is the accompanying form of every dharma-wisdom class, and the accompanying form of the subsequent-knowledge-of-the-path class presently manifest in a desire-realm body. There is form that is both desire-realm-bound and produced by desire-realm-bound great elements,

謂色欲界繫。欲界繫大種所造。此復云何。謂欲界繫有對所造色。

— namely, desire-realm-bound form produced by desire-realm-bound great elements. What is this, more precisely? It is desire-realm-bound resistant derived form,

及表所起無表。有色非欲界繫。非欲界繫大種所造。謂色界繫大種。若色色界繫。色界繫大種所造。若色不繫。色界繫大種所造。

— together with manifest-triggered unmanifest form. There is form neither desire-realm-bound nor produced by desire-realm-bound great elements — namely, form-realm-bound great elements; form-realm-bound form produced by form-realm-bound great elements; and unbound form produced by form-realm-bound great elements.

諸色色界繫彼色一切色界繫大種所造耶。答應作四句。有色色界繫。非色界繫大種所造。謂色界繫大種。所以如前有色色界繫大種所造。非色界繫。謂色不繫。色界繫大種所造。此復云何。謂依色界身現前類智品隨轉色。有色色界繫。色界繫大種所造。謂色色界繫。色界繫大種所造。此復云何。謂色界繫有對所造色。及有漏隨心轉無表。有色非色界繫。非色界繫大種所造。謂欲界繫大種。若色欲界繫。欲界繫大種所造。若色不繫。欲界繫大種所造。

Is every instance of form-realm-bound form produced by form-realm-bound great elements? Answer: a tetralemma should be constructed. There is form-realm-bound form not produced by form-realm-bound great elements — namely, the form-realm-bound great elements themselves, for the same reason as before. There is form produced by form-realm-bound great elements that is not itself form-realm-bound — namely, unbound form produced by form-realm-bound great elements. What is this, more precisely? It is the accompanying form of the subsequent-knowledge-of-the-path class presently manifest in a form-realm body. There is form that is both form-realm-bound and produced by form-realm-bound great elements — namely, form-realm-bound form produced by form-realm-bound great elements. What is this, more precisely? It is form-realm-bound resistant derived form, together with contaminated mind-following unmanifest form. There is form neither form-realm-bound nor produced by form-realm-bound great elements — namely, desire-realm-bound great elements; desire-realm-bound form produced by desire-realm-bound great elements; and unbound form produced by desire-realm-bound great elements.

Reading note — Ru-Yi

Running the identical exception twice — once for the desire realm, once for the form realm — rather than stating it as a single general principle, reflects the treatise's consistent preference for verifying a pattern independently in each specific case rather than assuming symmetry holds without being checked.

3. Time and Its Two Kinds of Basis: What Created a Thing, and What Sustains It

An elegant two-tier causal distinction emerges from the temporal analysis: an ongoing precept-restraint's unmanifest form depends on two entirely different kinds of "basis" — the past great elements that originally created it, and the present great elements that presently sustain its continued operation. The treatise deliberately speaks only of the former when explaining production, since all five generative causes belong strictly to the past, leaving the latter, quieter kind of dependency unstated but structurally essential.

Chinese Source

諸色過去。彼色一切過去大種所造耶。答應作四句。有色過去非過去大種所造。謂過去大種。所以如前。有色過去大種所造。非過去。謂色未來現在過去大種所造。此復云何。謂未來現在表所起無表。過去大種所造。以依過去表故。有色過去過去大種所造。謂色過去。過去大種所造。此復云何。謂過去一切有對所造色。隨心轉無表。表所起無表。有色非過去非過去大種所造。謂未來現在大種。若色未來現在。現在大種所造。若色未來。未來大種所造。

Ru-Yi Translation

Is every instance of past form produced by past great elements? Answer: a tetralemma should be constructed. There is past form not produced by past great elements — namely, the past great elements themselves, for the same reason as before. There is form produced by past great elements that is not itself past — namely, future or present form produced by past great elements. What is this, more precisely? It is future or present manifest-triggered unmanifest form produced by past great elements, since it depends on past manifest expression. There is past form produced by past great elements — namely, past form produced by past great elements. What is this, more precisely? It is every past resistant derived form, past mind-following unmanifest form, and past manifest-triggered unmanifest form. There is form neither past nor produced by past great elements — namely, future or present great elements; future or present form produced by present great elements; and future form produced by future great elements.

諸色未來。彼色一切未來大種所造耶。答諸色未來大種所造。彼色一切未來。此復云何。謂未來一切有對所造色。隨心轉無表。若表所起無表。未來大種所造。以依未來表故。有色未來非未來大種所造。謂未來大種。若色未來。過去現在大種所造。此復云何。謂未來表所起無表。過去現在大種所造。以依過去現在表故。

Is every instance of future form produced by future great elements? Answer: whatever form is produced by future great elements is necessarily future — but what is this, more precisely? It is every future resistant derived form and future mind-following unmanifest form, together with manifest-triggered unmanifest form produced by future great elements, since it depends on future manifest expression. There is future form not produced by future great elements — namely, the future great elements themselves; and future form produced by past or present great elements. What is this, more precisely? It is future manifest-triggered unmanifest form produced by past or present great elements, since it depends on past or present manifest expression.

諸色現在。彼色一切現在大種所造耶。答應作四句。有色現在非現在大種所造。謂現在大種若色現在。過去大種所造。此復云何。謂現在表所起無表。過去大種所造。所以如前。問此無表色。亦有現在所依大種。何故不說耶。答彼是轉依。非造依故。此無表色有二種依。一是轉依。謂現在大種。由彼力轉故。二是造依。謂過去大種。由彼力造故。此中但說造依。不說轉依。是故不說。能造五因皆過去故。有色現在。大種所造非現在。謂色未來。現在大種所造。此復云何。謂未來表所起無表。現在大種所造。所以如前。有色現在。現在大種所造。謂色現在。現在大種所造。此復云何。謂現在一切有對所造色。隨心轉無表。若現在表所起無表。現在大種所造。以依現在表故。有色非現在。非現在大種所造。謂過去未來大種。若色過去。未來過去大種所造。若色未來。未來大種所造地云何。乃至廣說問何故作此論。答欲令疑者得決定故。謂此論中多說勝義。或有生疑。彼作論者唯善勝義。不善世俗。為令彼疑得決定故。顯地界等與地等別。故作斯論。

Is every instance of present form produced by present great elements? Answer: a tetralemma should be constructed. There is present form not produced by present great elements — namely, the present great elements themselves. There is present form produced by past great elements. What is this, more precisely? It is present manifest-triggered unmanifest form produced by past great elements, for the same reason as before. Question: this unmanifest form also has present great elements underlying it — why is this not mentioned? Answer: those serve as the basis for its continuing operation, not the basis for its creation. This unmanifest form has two kinds of basis — first, the basis for its continuing operation, namely the present great elements, by whose power it continues to function; and second, the basis for its creation, namely the past great elements, by whose power it was originally created. This passage speaks only of the basis for creation, not the basis for continuing operation, and hence it is not mentioned, since all five of the generative causes belong to the past. There is form produced by great elements yet not itself present — namely, future form produced by present great elements. What is this, more precisely? It is future manifest-triggered unmanifest form produced by present great elements, for the same reason as before. There is present form produced by present great elements — namely, present form produced by present great elements. What is this, more precisely? It is every present resistant derived form and present mind-following unmanifest form, together with present manifest-triggered unmanifest form produced by present great elements, since it depends on present manifest expression. There is form neither present nor produced by present great elements — namely, past or future great elements; past form produced by future or past great elements; and future form produced by future great elements. What is earth? And so on in full. Question: why compose this treatise? Answer: in order to bring certainty to those in doubt — for, since this treatise speaks so extensively of ultimate matters, some might doubt that its author is skilled only in ultimate truth, unfamiliar with conventional matters — and it is in order to bring certainty to this doubt, and to show the distinction between the earth-element and "earth" in the ordinary sense, that this treatise is composed.

Reading note — Ru-Yi

Distinguishing what created something from what merely sustains its continued operation is a genuinely useful piece of conceptual machinery, applicable well beyond this specific technical context: many things in ordinary experience — habits, institutions, relationships — likewise depend on one set of conditions to have been brought into being and an entirely different, ongoing set merely to keep functioning, and conflating the two is a common source of confusion this distinction quietly forestalls.

4. What Is Earth? What Is Water? The Everyday Word and the Ultimate Substance

A justly famous passage distinguishes the everyday word "earth" — a merely conventional label the world applies, by shared agreement, to certain combinations of color and shape, as when people speak of "blue earth" or "long earth" — from the ultimate earth-element itself, which refers only to the tactile quality of solidity, the one true substance capable of producing derived earth-form at all. The identical distinction is then drawn for water: conventional "water" names a visible color and shape, while the water-element proper is simply the tactile quality of moisture.

Chinese Source

地云何。答顯形色此是世俗想施設地謂諸世間於顯形色。依共假想施設地名。如世間說青黃地等。長短地等。地界云何。答堅性觸。

Ru-Yi Translation

What is earth? Answer: it is color and shape — this is the conventional notion by which "earth" is designated, that is, the world, with respect to color and shape, designates the name "earth" on the basis of a shared, conventional notion — as when the world speaks of "blue earth" or "yellow earth," or of "long earth" or "short earth." What is the earth-element? Answer: it is the tactile quality of solidity —

此是勝義能造地體。

— this is the ultimate substance capable of producing earth.

水云何。答顯形色此是世俗想施設水。謂諸世間於顯形色。依共假想施設水名。如世間說青黃等水。長短等水。云何水界。答濕性觸。此是勝義能造水體。

What is water? Answer: it is color and shape — this is the conventional notion by which "water" is designated, that is, the world, with respect to color and shape, designates the name "water" on the basis of a shared, conventional notion — as when the world speaks of "blue water" or "yellow water," or of "long water" or "short water." What is the water-element? Answer: it is the tactile quality of moisture — this is the ultimate substance capable of producing water.

Reading note — Ru-Yi

The everyday word "earth" and the technical earth-element turn out to name entirely different things by the treatise's own account — the ordinary word tracks how something looks, while the ultimate substance tracks what it actually, tactilely is — a distinction that quietly reframes the entire project of Abhidharma physics as an attempt to see past appearance to the specific felt qualities genuinely doing the causal work beneath it.

5. What Is Fire? A Brahmin's Verse on Reading Omens in the Flames — and Why Wind Has No Everyday Name

The same conventional-versus-ultimate distinction completes itself for fire, illustrated with a striking fragment from a brahmin's own scripture on reading fortune in the color of flames — red for sickness, yellow for war, mixed colors for abundance, blue for decline, white or black for ruin. Wind alone breaks the pattern: the everyday world, unlike with earth, water, and fire, forms no conventional color-and-shape notion of wind at all, though some masters note partial exceptions in ordinary phrases like "dusty wind" or various named winds.

Chinese Source

火云何。答顯形色此是世俗想施設火。謂諸世間於顯形色。依共假想施設火名。如世間說青黃等火。長短等火。又如梵志觀火。頌云。

Ru-Yi Translation

What is fire? Answer: it is color and shape — this is the conventional notion by which "fire" is designated, that is, the world, with respect to color and shape, designates the name "fire" on the basis of a shared, conventional notion — as when the world speaks of "blue fire" or "yellow fire," or of "long fire" or "short fire." And, as in the brahmin's own scripture on reading fire, its verse says:

赤焰多疾疫 黃兵緣飢饉綵豐青退減 白黑主興滅火界云何。答煖性觸。此是勝義能造火體。風云何。答即風界。風界云何。答動性觸。問何故不說世俗風耶。答世間於風無假想故。

"A red flame brings many illnesses; A yellow one, war caused by famine; A parti-colored flame, abundance; a blue one, decline; A white or a black flame governs rise and ruin." What is the fire-element? Answer: it is the tactile quality of heat — this is the ultimate substance capable of producing fire. What is wind? Answer: it is simply the wind-element itself. What is the wind-element? Answer: it is the tactile quality of motion. Question: why is there no conventional sense of "wind" spoken of, as there is for the other three? Answer: because the world forms no such conventional notion with respect to wind at all,

有餘師說。世間於風亦起假想少故不說。如世間說此有塵風。此無塵風。毘濕縛風。吠嵐婆風。小風大風。塵輪風等。

— unlike its treatment of color and shape for the other three. Other masters say: the world does form some conventional notion of wind as well, though only a slight one, and hence it is not separately mentioned — as when the world speaks of "a dusty wind" or "a dust-free wind," or of the Viśvabhū wind, the Vairambha wind, small winds and great winds, and whirlwind-dust-column winds, and the like.

Reading note — Ru-Yi

That wind alone resists everyday naming the way earth, water, and fire do not is a quietly telling observation about the psychology of perception: people form conventional, color-based mental pictures readily for whatever presents a visible surface to look at, but wind, felt rather than seen, simply never accumulates the same kind of shared, nameable folk imagery — invisibility itself turns out to be an obstacle to ordinary language, not merely to ordinary sight.

6. Which Senses Perceive the Four Elements, Conventionally and Ultimately

A precise mapping shows that conventional earth, water, and fire — being visible color and shape — fall under the form sense-field, perceived by both eye- and mental-consciousness, while conventional wind falls under touch, perceived by body- and mental-consciousness instead. In their ultimate, technical sense, however, all four elements alike fall under the touch sense-field exclusively, perceived only by body- and mental-consciousness — never the eye, since no purely tactile quality, however visually associated in ordinary experience, can ever itself be seen.

Chinese Source

地水火風幾處所攝。乃至廣說。問何故作此論。答欲令疑者得決定故。謂聞所說世俗地等。便謂無體。非處所攝。非識所識。或謂假實同一處攝。同一識識。為除彼疑顯假地等亦實有體但假立名。於五處中隨一處攝。於五識中隨一識識。又顯假實不同處攝。不同識識。由此等緣故作斯論。

Ru-Yi Translation

Under how many sense-fields are earth, water, fire, and wind subsumed? And so on in full. Question: why compose this treatise? Answer: in order to bring certainty to those in doubt — for, upon hearing that conventional "earth" and the rest are spoken of, some might suppose these have no real essential nature, are subsumed under no sense-field, and are perceived by no consciousness at all; or might suppose that the conventional and the ultimate are subsumed under the very same sense-field and perceived by the very same consciousness. It is in order to remove this doubt, and to show that conventional earth and the rest, though a merely nominal designation, still possess a real essential nature, subsumed within one of the five sense-fields and perceived by one of the five sense-consciousnesses — and further, to show that the conventional and the ultimate are subsumed under different sense-fields and perceived by different consciousnesses — that this treatise is composed.

地水火風幾處所攝。幾識所識。答地水火一處所攝。謂色處眼所見故。二識所識。謂眼識意識。眼識取自相。意識取自相共相。風一處所攝。謂觸處身所得故。二識所識謂身識意識。取自共相如前應知。有說。此亦通色處攝。及眼識識少故不說。

Under how many sense-fields are earth, water, fire, and wind subsumed, and by how many consciousnesses are they perceived? Answer: earth, water, and fire are subsumed under one sense-field — the form sense-field, since they are seen by the eye — and perceived by two consciousnesses — eye-consciousness and mental-consciousness, with eye-consciousness taking only the particular own-characteristic, and mental-consciousness taking both the particular and the shared characteristic. Wind is subsumed under one sense-field — the touch sense-field, since it is grasped by the body — and perceived by two consciousnesses — body-consciousness and mental-consciousness, taking the particular and shared characteristic just as explained before. Others say: wind, too, is partly subsumed under the form sense-field and partly perceived by eye-consciousness, though only to a small degree, and hence this is not separately mentioned.

地水火風界幾處所攝幾識所識。答一處所攝謂觸處身所得故。二識所識。謂身識意識。取自共相如前應知。問幾處和合說為能牽。幾處和合說為所牽。答若有情數於有情數。則九處能牽。九處所牽。

Under how many sense-fields are the earth-, water-, fire-, and wind-elements subsumed, and by how many consciousnesses are they perceived? Answer: they are subsumed under one sense-field — the touch sense-field, since they are grasped by the body — and perceived by two consciousnesses — body-consciousness and mental-consciousness, taking the particular and shared characteristic just as explained before. Question: how many sense-fields, combined, are said to actively "draw" something, and how many are "drawn"? Answer: when a sentient being draws a sentient being, nine sense-fields actively draw, and nine sense-fields are drawn;

Reading note — Ru-Yi

That solidity, moisture, and heat — despite habitually accompanying visible earth, water, and fire in every ordinary encounter with them — can never themselves be seen, only ever felt, is a precise reminder that visual association is not the same as visual content: the eye registers color and shape, and no amount of habitual pairing with a tactile quality ever grants that quality genuine visibility of its own.

7. Drawing, Weighing, Burning, Cutting, Washing: The Elements at Work in Daily Life

A charming cluster of practical puzzles applies the four elements to concrete everyday actions: how many sense-fields combine to draw, hold, or carry something (varying by whether sentient or insentient objects are involved); to weigh or counterbalance something (the physical faculties themselves too subtle ever to be weighed); to burn or sever something (with rival views crediting either all four elements jointly or heat and solidity specifically as the true active agents); and, most elaborately, to wash something — with competing answers locating the washed object in color, in touch, or, most expansively, across all twelve internal sense-fields left bright and clear by bathing.

Chinese Source

若有情數於非有情數則九處能牽。四處所牽。若非有情數於非有情數。則四處能牽。四處所牽。若非有情數於有情數。則四處能牽。

Ru-Yi Translation

— when a sentient being draws an insentient object, nine sense-fields actively draw, and four are drawn; when an insentient object draws another insentient object, four sense-fields actively draw, and four are drawn; when an insentient object draws a sentient being, four sense-fields actively draw,

九處所牽。如說牽持運等亦爾。問幾處和合說為能量。幾處和合說為所量。答四處能量。四處所量。五根微妙非量法故。問幾處和合說為能稱。幾處和合說為所稱。有作是說。四處能稱四處所稱。有餘師說。四處能稱重是所稱。問幾處和合說為能燒。幾處和合說為所燒。有作是說。四處能燒。四處所燒。有餘師說。煖是能燒。四是所燒。問幾處和合說為能斷。幾處和合說為所斷。有作是說。四處能斷。四處所斷。有餘師說。堅性是能斷。四處是所斷。問幾處和合說為能洗。幾處和合說為所洗。有作是說。四處能洗。四處所洗。有餘師說。四處能洗。色處所洗。如說洗已鮮白。或如金色。

— and nine sense-fields are drawn. What is said of drawing is likewise said of holding, carrying, and the like. Question: how many sense-fields, combined, are said to actively "weigh" something, and how many are "weighed"? Answer: four sense-fields actively weigh, and four are weighed, since the five faculties themselves are too subtle to be the object of weighing. Question: how many sense-fields, combined, are said to actively "counterbalance" something, and how many are "counterbalanced"? Some say: four actively counterbalance, and four are counterbalanced. Others say: four actively counterbalance, while weight itself is what is counterbalanced. Question: how many sense-fields, combined, are said to actively "burn" something, and how many are "burned"? Some say: four actively burn, and four are burned. Others say: heat alone actively burns, while the four together are what is burned. Question: how many sense-fields, combined, are said to actively "sever" something, and how many are "severed"? Some say: four actively sever, and four are severed. Others say: solidity alone actively severs, while the four together are what is severed. Question: how many sense-fields, combined, are said to actively "wash" something, and how many are "washed"? Some say: four actively wash, and four are washed. Others say: four actively wash, while the form sense-field alone is what is washed — as when it is said, "washed until fair and bright," or "like gold in color."

復有說者。四處能洗。觸是所洗。如說杯盛澡屑往某池邊。揩洗其身令去塵垢。或有說者。四處是能洗。十二處是所洗。由洗浴故。

Others, further, say: four actively wash, while touch alone is what is washed — as when it is said, "holding a cup of bathing-powder, one goes to the edge of a certain pond, and scrubs the body clean of dust and grime." Others say: four actively wash, while all twelve internal sense-fields are what is washed, since, through bathing,

內十二處皆悉明淨離諸垢濁。

— all twelve internal sense-fields become bright and clear, free of every trace of defilement and turbidity.

Reading note — Ru-Yi

The washing puzzle's most generous answer — that bathing purifies all twelve internal sense-fields at once, not merely visible color or felt cleanliness — quietly elevates an utterly mundane act into something closer to a small, total renewal of the whole sensory apparatus, treating an ordinary bath as touching every channel through which a person actually experiences the world, not just the one or two most obviously involved.

8. Why Can't Earth Ever Become a World-Ending Calamity?

A pivotal cosmological question opens the fascicle's grand cosmological turn: of the four great elements, only fire, water, and wind can ever serve as one of the three world-ending calamities that periodically destroy entire world-systems — never earth. A cascade of explanations converges on a shared logic: a calamity must act as an external, destructive agent, and earth cannot meaningfully destroy itself; only the fierce and sharp can devastate, while earth's own nature is sluggish and dull; and, most strikingly, no calamity of any kind — fire, water, or wind alike — can ever reach the fourth dhyāna, since that level alone lacks any corresponding "internal calamity" of its own, unlike the first three dhyānas, each internally mirroring one of the three external destructive forces.

Chinese Source

問此四大種幾能為災。答三。除地問何故地不能為災。答非其田。

Ru-Yi Translation

Question: of these four great elements, how many are capable of serving as a calamity? Answer: three — excluding earth. Question: why is earth not capable of serving as a calamity? Answer: because it is not its own proper field,

非其器。乃至廣說。有說。猛利方能為災。地性遲鈍不能為災。有說。若能損壞內事。彼於外事亦能為災。謂斷末摩名壞內事。此唯三大。故地非災。有說。為壞地故立災。三大於地能燒浸擊故說為災。地則不爾。有說。若地亦為災者。應從風輪。乃至第四靜慮皆令堅固。合為一摶此乃成劫非謂能壞。有說。若地能為災者。便應壞及第四靜慮。然無諸災壞及彼者。此中因論生論。何故彼地災不及之。有說。即由地非災故。有說。彼地若為災及是則應無最上災頂。謂上三靜慮如次能為三災之頂。若第四靜慮災所壞者。便更無處為上災頂。以諸無色無方處故。有說欲避淨居諸天。由彼更無上生義故。若彼處所災所及者。則淨居天無有盡壽而涅槃者。若爾云何知彼壽量。若言亦有盡壽涅槃。是則彼地災無由起。如說若處乃至尚餘一蟻卵在災便不壞。有說若處有內災者便有外災。第四靜慮無內災故外災不及。謂初靜慮內有如火尋伺故。外有火災。第二靜慮內有如水喜悅故外有水災。第三靜慮內有入出息風故外有風災。

— nor its own proper vessel, and so on in full. Others say: only what is fierce and sharp can serve as a calamity, whereas earth's own nature is sluggish and dull, incapable of serving as one. Others say: whatever is capable of damaging an internal vital point is also capable of serving as an external calamity — namely, severing the marman point, which constitutes damage to an internal matter — and this capacity belongs only to the three, and hence earth is not a calamity. Others say: a calamity is established specifically for the purpose of destroying earth — the three great elements are capable of burning, soaking, and striking earth, and hence are called calamities, while earth is not so. Others say: were earth also capable of serving as a calamity, then everything from the wind-wheel up through the fourth dhyāna would be compacted into a single solid mass — but this would describe the formation of an eon, not its destruction. Others say: were earth capable of serving as a calamity, it ought to be capable of reaching and destroying the fourth dhyāna as well — yet no calamity of any kind ever reaches or destroys that level. Here, one line of reasoning gives rise to a further question: why does no calamity reach that far? Some say: simply because earth is not itself a calamity. Others say: were that ground reached by a calamity, there would then be no uppermost peak of destruction at all — for the upper three dhyānas each serve, in turn, as the destructive peak of one of the three calamities, and, were the fourth dhyāna also destroyed by some calamity, there would be no place left to serve as this uppermost peak, since the formless realms have no spatial location at all. Others say: it is in order to spare the Pure Abodes, since there is no possibility of rebirth above them — were that place reached by a calamity, then no being in the Pure Abodes could ever attain nirvāṇa before the exhaustion of their own lifespan. Question: if so, how could their lifespan ever be verified at all? If it is said that they do indeed sometimes attain nirvāṇa before their lifespan is exhausted, then this itself already explains why no calamity ever arises there — as it is said, wherever even a single ant's egg still remains, that place is never destroyed by calamity. Others say: destruction reaches only wherever a corresponding internal calamity is also present — and the fourth dhyāna alone has no internal calamity at all, and hence no external calamity reaches it — for the first dhyāna has, within it, something like an internal fire, namely reflection and investigation, and hence has an external fire-calamity; the second dhyāna has, within it, something like an internal water, namely joy, and hence has an external water-calamity; and the third dhyāna has, within it, an internal wind, namely the in-and-out breath, and hence has an external wind-calamity.

第四靜慮更無內災。是故外災皆不能及。

The fourth dhyāna alone has no internal calamity of any kind, and hence no external calamity of any kind can ever reach it.

Reading note — Ru-Yi

The principle that external destruction can only ever reach as far as a corresponding internal calamity already exists is a beautifully symmetrical piece of cosmological reasoning: the fourth dhyāna's own inner stillness — lacking anything resembling fire's discursive thought, water's joy, or wind's breath — becomes, by this very logic, the structural reason no external catastrophe of any kind can ever touch it, turning a state of meditative attainment into a form of cosmic invulnerability.

9. How Fire, Water, and Wind Actually Begin

Competing mythological accounts describe the precise mechanics behind each calamity's onset — seven suns, either rising in sequence, splitting from one, or multiplying in heat, eventually consuming the world in fire up through the Brahma-heaven; scalding ash-rain or floodwater surging from below, dissolving everything up through the Ābhāsvara heaven; and a colossal wind called Vaḍabāmukha, or one surging from beneath the world, scattering everything up through the Śubhakṛtsna heaven like flour dispersed by a gust. Throughout, the treatise's own preferred explanation locates the true cause not in any of these vivid mechanisms but in the simple, natural exhaustion of the collective karmic power that once sustained the world's formation.

Chinese Source

問火災起時火從何出。有作是說。世界成時有七日輪俱時而起。持雙山後隱伏而住。然後彼處一日輪昇。遶蘇迷盧而為照耀。至劫將末火災起時。餘六日輪漸次而出。由彼勢力世界便壞。有說。世界將欲壞時。即一日輪分為七日。由彼勢力世界便壞。有說即一日輪至劫將末。成七倍熱焚燒世界。有說。七日先藏地下。後漸出現作用如前。如是說者。諸有情類業增上力。令世界成。至劫末時。業力盡故。隨於近處有災火生。乃至梵宮皆被焚燎。

Ru-Yi Translation

Question: when the fire-calamity arises, from where does the fire come? Some say: at the formation of the world, seven suns arise together, and, remaining hidden behind the Holding-Twin Mountains, one alone then rises and circles Sumeru, providing light — and, as the eon draws near its end and the fire-calamity arises, the remaining six suns gradually emerge, and, through their combined power, the world is destroyed. Others say: as the world is about to be destroyed, this single sun itself divides into seven, and, through their combined power, the world is destroyed. Others say: this same single sun, as the eon draws near its end, becomes sevenfold hotter, burning up the world. Others say: seven suns are first buried beneath the earth, and later gradually emerge, functioning just as described. According to this last account: it is the accumulated power of beings' own karma that causes the world to form, and, as the eon draws to its end, once this karmic power is exhausted, a calamitous fire spontaneously arises nearby, wherever conditions are ripe, ultimately consuming everything up through the Brahma-heaven.

問水災起時水從何出。有作是說。第三靜慮邊雨熱灰水。由此乃至極光淨天皆被浸蕩。有說。從下水輪涌出。由彼勢力世界便壞。如是說者。諸有情類業增上力令世界成。至劫末時業力盡故。隨於近處有災水生。由彼因緣世界便壞。

Question: when the water-calamity arises, from where does the water come? Some say: at the edge of the third dhyāna, a rain of scalding ash-water falls, soaking and flooding everything up through the Ābhāsvara heaven. Others say: it surges up from the water-wheel below, and, through its power, the world is destroyed. According to this last account: it is the accumulated power of beings' own karma that causes the world to form, and, as the eon draws to its end, once this karmic power is exhausted, a calamitous water spontaneously arises nearby, wherever conditions are ripe, and, through this cause and condition, the world is destroyed.

問風災起時風從何出。有作是說。第四靜慮邊有畔喋婆大風。卒起百俱胝界。妙高山王金輪圍等皆被傾拔。令互相擊上下翻騰。如麨麵摶空中散滅。有餘師說。從下風輪有猛風起。吹散世界。如是說者諸有情類業增上力。令世界成。至劫末時業力盡故。隨於近處有災風生。至遍淨天皆被散壞。

Question: when the wind-calamity arises, from where does the wind come? Some say: at the edge of the fourth dhyāna, a great Vaḍabāmukha wind suddenly arises across a hundred million world-systems, uprooting and overturning Mount Sumeru itself together with the surrounding golden mountains and rings, causing them to collide and tumble, scattering into open space like flour or dough dispersed by a gust. Other masters say: a fierce wind surges up from the wind-wheel below, blowing the world apart. According to this last account: it is the accumulated power of beings' own karma that causes the world to form, and, as the eon draws to its end, once this karmic power is exhausted, a calamitous wind spontaneously arises nearby, wherever conditions are ripe, ultimately scattering and destroying everything up through the Śubhakṛtsna heaven.

Reading note — Ru-Yi

Preferring karmic exhaustion over any of the more visually dramatic mythological mechanisms — multiplying suns, colossal winds, submarine floods — as the calamities' own true cause reveals the treatise's underlying commitment: however richly imagined the destructive imagery, the actual engine of cosmic destruction is always, at bottom, moral and causal rather than merely physical, the vivid mechanics serving as vivid illustration of an ethical principle rather than as the genuine explanation itself.

10. Do Objects Truly Transform to Meet Their Doom? And Why a Calamity Never Crosses Realms

A subtle puzzle asks whether every object throughout the cosmos literally transforms in substance to meet its coming destruction — becoming as dry as straw before fire, as soluble as sugar before water, as loose as flour-dough before wind — and, if so, whether this violates the treatise's own repeated principle that no dharma ever abandons its own characteristic. The firm answer denies any such literal transformation: solidity, moisture, and the rest remain exactly what they always were, and it is solely the accumulated power of beings' own karma that renders the otherwise-indestructible destructible. A further principle confirms that each calamity destroys only its own native realm and ground — a sūtra describing flames reaching the Brahma-heaven must be understood as one fire lighting a distinct, higher fire in unbroken continuity, never a single desire-realm blaze somehow reaching upward on its own.

Chinese Source

問三災起時一切外物。為皆轉變順彼災耶。有作是言。物皆變順。

Ru-Yi Translation

Question: when any of the three calamities arises, do all external objects everywhere actually undergo transformation to accord with that calamity? Some say: every object does indeed transform accordingly —

謂此世界火災起時。一切外物皆悉輕燥。猶如乾草疊絮樺皮。火纔觸時即燒即盡。若水災起一切外物。皆將融液如沙糖等。水纔觸時隨即消壞。若風災起一切外物。皆將離散如沙麨摶。風纔觸時即便散壞。若爾諸法應捨自相。如是說者。三災起時堅濕等物亦無轉變。但由有情業增上力。令三災起能壞難壞。

— that is, when this world's fire-calamity arises, every external object becomes as light and dry as withered grass, cotton wadding, or birch bark, and, the instant fire touches it, is instantly consumed; when the water-calamity arises, every external object becomes as soluble as sugar or the like, and, the instant water touches it, instantly dissolves; and when the wind-calamity arises, every external object becomes as loosely cohered as flour-dough, and, the instant wind touches it, instantly scatters. But, were this so, every dharma would then have to abandon its own characteristic. According to this final account: even when the three calamities arise, solid, moist, and other such objects undergo no actual transformation at all — it is solely through the accumulated power of beings' own karma that these calamities become capable of destroying what would otherwise be difficult to destroy.

如是三災與所壞事。必是同分界地所攝。謂欲界災能壞欲界。初靜慮災壞初靜慮。乃至第三靜慮亦爾。問若爾。經說當云何通。如說大地妙高山等皆悉洞然。風吹絕焰展轉乃至上燒梵宮。極光淨天有生未久。於劫成壞不善了知。見已驚恐便作是念。勿彼火焰燒盡梵宮當復燒此。答當知彼經依相續說。謂色界火續欲界生。彼燒梵宮。非欲界火水風相續准此應知。

Thus the three calamities and what they destroy must necessarily belong to the same class of realm and ground — that is, a desire-realm calamity destroys the desire realm, a first-dhyāna calamity destroys the first dhyāna, and likewise up through the third dhyāna. Question: if so, how is the sūtra to be reconciled, which says that the great earth, Mount Sumeru, and the rest all become ablaze, the wind fanning the flames higher and higher until they burn up even the Brahma-heaven — and that beings in the Ābhāsvara heaven, having only recently been reborn there, not yet well versed in the formation and destruction of eons, seeing this, are terrified, thinking, "Once those flames finish consuming the Brahma-heaven, they will surely come to burn us as well"? Answer: one should understand that sūtra to speak with reference to unbroken continuity — that is, a form-realm fire, arising in unbroken continuity from the desire-realm fire, is what burns the Brahma-heaven, and not the very same desire-realm fire, water, or wind itself reaching upward — this same principle should be understood accordingly throughout.

Reading note — Ru-Yi

Insisting that even total cosmic destruction never actually changes what solidity or moisture essentially are — only how vulnerable karma renders them — extends the treatise's signature metaphysical commitment to its most extreme possible test case: if even the literal burning of an entire world-system doesn't count as any dharma abandoning its own characteristic, then this principle has been defended about as rigorously as it possibly could be.

11. Seven Fires, One Flood: The Precise Rhythm of Destruction

An elegant numerical structure governs the calamities' own sequence: seven fire-calamities occur consecutively, followed by a single water-calamity, this whole cycle repeating seven times, and only then, following the seventh flood, does a single wind-calamity finally arise — a pattern that neatly explains the traditional teaching of the Ābhāsvara heaven's own sixty-four-kalpa lifespan. The destruction phase itself then proceeds through an exhaustive, almost documentary sequence: hell-beings vanish first, then animals, then ghosts, then humans beginning with Jambudvīpa — raising the charmingly concrete puzzle of how humans manage without animal labor or dairy once the animal realm has already gone extinct.

Chinese Source

問此三災起先後云何。答火水風三如次先後。然非三種隣次而生。

Ru-Yi Translation

Question: in what sequence do the three calamities arise? Answer: fire, water, and wind occur in that order in succession — yet not in immediate, alternating succession with one another,

謂七火災先次第起。然後方有一水災生。如是經於七七火劫。及七水劫。復七火災。從彼無間一風災起。故風水劫皆次火生。火劫從三以數起故。由此善釋遍淨天壽六十四劫。如是所說是大劫量。一一各有八十中劫。成住壞空各二十故。且初火劫將燒壞時。贍部洲人壽八萬歲。安隱豐樂人眾甚多。國邑村城雞飛相及。人多修習十善業道。從此以後捺落迦中有情命終不復生彼。爾時已度二十住劫。二十壞劫此為最初。地獄有情從此漸減乃至最後無一為餘。名為地獄有情界壞。次壞傍生。次壞餓鬼。一一壞相如地獄說。次贍部洲諸有情壞。問傍生鬼趣先人壞者。人中所須乳酪等味。耕馭等事如何得有。有說。由人業增上力。有非情物似傍生現。出乳等味作諸事業。問人身今有八萬戶虫。作任持緣令身相續。彼時既闕身云何存。答爾時人身法爾得住。如諸菩薩轉輪王身。雖無諸虫而法爾住。如是說者。諸大海中是諸傍生本所住處。若彼無有一傍生時。即名傍生有情界壞。若傍生類人等雜居。人等壞時彼方隨壞。

— namely, seven fire-calamities occur consecutively first, and only then does a single water-calamity arise; this pattern then repeats across seven such cycles of seven fire-eons and one water-eon each, and, immediately following the seventh water-calamity, a single wind-calamity then arises. Hence the water- and wind-eons each follow directly upon a fire-eon, while fire-eons occur in cycles counted from three — and it is on this basis that the Ābhāsvara heaven's own sixty-four-kalpa lifespan is properly explained. What is here called a great eon consists of eighty intermediate eons each, twenty each for formation, duration, destruction, and emptiness. Now, as the first fire-eon is about to burn and destroy the world, the people of Jambudvīpa live to eighty thousand years, at peace, prosperous, and exceedingly numerous, their cities, towns, and villages so close together that a chicken could fly from one to the next — and most people practice the ten wholesome courses of conduct. From this point on, no being who dies in hell is reborn there again — this marks the completion of the twenty duration-eons, and the beginning of the twenty destruction-eons. Hell-beings gradually diminish from this point until not a single one remains — this is called the destruction of the hell-being world; next the animal realm is destroyed, then the ghost realm, each following the same pattern as hell; and next the beings of Jambudvīpa are destroyed. Question: if the animal and ghost realms are destroyed before humans, how could humans still obtain milk, butter, and the like, or still perform agricultural and transport labor requiring animals? Some say: through the accumulated power of human karma, insentient objects come to resemble animals in appearance, producing milk and the like and performing such labor. Question: the human body presently depends on eighty thousand households of parasitic organisms to sustain its own continuity — how, then, could it continue to exist once these were lacking? Answer: at that time, the human body naturally continues to persist of its own accord, just as the bodies of bodhisattvas and wheel-turning kings, though lacking such parasites, naturally persist all the same. According to this final account: the great oceans are the animal realm's own original dwelling place, and, once not a single animal remains there, this is called the destruction of the animal-being world — though, where animals dwell intermixed among humans and the like, when the humans are destroyed, those animals are destroyed along with them.

Reading note — Ru-Yi

The very specific practical puzzle about milk and plow-animals, tucked inside an otherwise cosmic-scale account of universal destruction, is a small but telling reminder that this tradition never lets grand metaphysical claims float free of ordinary, lived concerns: even while describing the end of an entire world-system, the treatise pauses to ask how breakfast would actually work.

12. One Meditator Discovers a Higher Bliss, and an Entire Heaven Follows Him Up

A beautiful, repeating pattern completes the destruction sequence: in each doomed realm in turn, a single being, entirely without a teacher, spontaneously discovers the next dhyāna up, and, emerging from that absorption, proclaims aloud how blissful and tranquil it is — a proclamation that spreads by word of mouth until every being in that realm has likewise attained it and been reborn together into the heaven above, leaving the lower realm entirely, peacefully empty. This same self-propagating migration repeats continent by continent, heaven by heaven, through the entire desire realm, and finally at the level of the first dhyāna itself, discovering the second and emptying the whole desire realm and first dhyāna together.

Chinese Source

鬼有情壞類此應知。然贍部洲人趣將壞。爾時法爾有一有情。無師自思入初靜慮。從彼定起唱如是言。此初靜慮甚樂甚靜。展轉宣告遍贍部洲。聞者攝心皆入初定。從此捨壽上生梵天。贍部洲中有情漸減。乃至無一有情為餘。名贍部洲。有情界壞。次壞毘提訶洲。

Ru-Yi Translation

The destruction of the ghost-being world should be understood in this same way. Now, as the human destiny of Jambudvīpa is about to be destroyed, at that time, naturally and of its own accord, a single being, without any teacher, reflects on his own and enters the first dhyāna — and, rising from that absorption, proclaims, "This first dhyāna is exceedingly blissful, exceedingly tranquil!" — and this proclamation spreads by word of mouth throughout the whole of Jambudvīpa, so that all who hear it likewise gather their minds and enter the first dhyāna, and, upon death, are all reborn above in the Brahma-heaven. The beings of Jambudvīpa thereby gradually diminish until not a single one remains — this is called the destruction of Jambudvīpa's own being-world. Next, Videha is destroyed;

次壞。瞿陀尼洲。一一壞相如贍部說。北拘盧洲如三惡趣。無得靜慮生梵世者。然彼壽盡必生欲天。乃至彼處有情界盡。名北拘盧有情界壞。人趣壞已四大王眾天。法爾有一得初靜慮。從彼定起宣告如前。乃至彼處有情界盡。名彼天中有情界壞。次壞三十三天。次壞夜摩天。次壞覩史多天。次壞樂變化天。次壞他化自在天。一一壞相如初天說。欲界有情次第壞已。時初靜慮有一有情。法爾能入第二靜慮。從彼定起唱如是言。第二靜慮甚樂甚靜。如是展轉聲遍梵宮。聞者攝心入第二定。命終皆往生彼天中。初靜慮天有情漸減。乃至無一有情為餘。名為梵天有情界壞。如是欲界及諸梵宮。

— then Godānīya, each following the same pattern as described for Jambudvīpa. Uttarakuru, being like the three evil destinies, has no one who attains dhyāna and is reborn in the Brahma-world — rather, once their lifespan is exhausted, they are necessarily reborn among the gods of the desire realm, and, once every being there is gone, this is called the destruction of Uttarakuru's own being-world. Once the human destiny is destroyed, in the Heaven of the Four Great Kings, naturally and of its own accord, a single being attains the first dhyāna and, rising from that absorption, proclaims as before, and, once every being there is likewise gone, this is called the destruction of that heaven's own being-world. Next the Heaven of the Thirty-Three is destroyed, then Yāma, then Tuṣita, then Nirmāṇarati, then Paranirmita-vaśavartin, each following the same pattern as the first heaven. Once the beings of the desire realm have thus been destroyed in sequence, a single being within the first dhyāna, naturally and of its own accord, becomes capable of entering the second dhyāna, and, rising from that absorption, proclaims, "This second dhyāna is exceedingly blissful, exceedingly tranquil!" — and this proclamation spreads by word of mouth throughout the entire Brahma-world, so that all who hear it likewise gather their minds and enter the second dhyāna, and, upon death, are all reborn in that heaven above. The beings of the first-dhyāna heaven thereby gradually diminish until not a single one remains — this is called the destruction of the Brahma-heaven's own being-world. Thus the desire realm together with every Brahma-heaven

Reading note — Ru-Yi

An entire cosmic destruction accomplished not through violence or coercion but through a single spontaneous discovery, freely shared and freely followed by everyone who hears it, is a strikingly gentle image at the center of an otherwise catastrophic cosmology: the world does not end in terror here, but in an orderly, voluntary, almost joyful migration upward, each realm emptying only because something genuinely better has just been found.

13. Seven Suns Rise in Turn: Ponds, Springs, and Rivers Vanish One by One

Once the desire realm and first dhyāna stand entirely empty, the fire-calamity's own physical mechanics unfold in magnificent, escalating stages: first a vast rainless age withers every plant to nothing; then a second sun appears, drying every pond and spring; a third, drying every river; a fourth, drying even the sacred lake of Anavatapta and its four great rivers.

Chinese Source

久遠空虛無有情類。贍部洲等大地諸山。經歷多時天不降雨。一切草木皆悉乾燋。更不復生乃至都盡。久時復有第二日輪出現世間。

Ru-Yi Translation

— remains empty and desolate for a vast span of time, with no beings present at all. Over Jambudvīpa and the great earth's other continents and mountains, for a long span of time, no rain falls from the sky, and every tree and plant withers, dries out, and ceases to grow again, until all vanish entirely. After a long span of time, a second sun then appears in the world,

炎赫倍熱由此枯涸坑㵎泉池。乃至令其都無津潤。久時復有第三日輪出現世間。炎赫倍熱。由此枯竭一切江河。乃至令其都無津潤。

— its blazing heat doubled, and, on account of this, every pit, ravine, spring, and pool dries up completely, until not a trace of moisture remains anywhere. After another long span of time, a third sun then appears in the world, its blazing heat doubled again, and, on account of this, every river and stream dries up entirely, until not a trace of moisture remains anywhere.

久時復有第四日輪出現世間。炎赫倍熱。由此枯涸無熱惱池。即四大河所從出者。謂殑伽信度縛芻私多。乃至令其都無津潤。久時復有第五日輪出現世間。炎赫倍熱。由此漸次枯涸大海。乃至令其都無津潤。久時復有第六日輪出現世間。炎赫倍熱。由此大地妙高山等。皆悉焦熬發煙熢㶿。久時復有第七日輪出現世間。炎赫極熱。

After another long span of time, a fourth sun then appears in the world, its blazing heat doubled again, and, on account of this, the lake of Anavatapta itself dries up completely — that same lake from which the four great rivers flow, the Gaṅgā, the Sindhu, the Vakṣu, and the Sītā — until not a trace of moisture remains anywhere. After another long span of time, a fifth sun then appears in the world, its blazing heat doubled again, and, on account of this, the great ocean itself gradually dries up completely, until not a trace of moisture remains anywhere. After another long span of time, a sixth sun then appears in the world, its blazing heat doubled again, and, on account of this, the great earth and Mount Sumeru itself become scorched, smoking and smoldering. After another long span of time, a seventh sun then appears in the world, its blazing heat now at its utmost intensity,

Reading note — Ru-Yi

The escalating count of suns — each one drying a progressively larger body of water, from puddle to sacred lake — builds a slow, almost unbearable tension purely through repetition and scale: the reader watches the world's water disappear one category at a time, each stage confirming that nothing, however vast, will be spared the one still to come.

14. The Seventh Sun, and Emptiness Gives Way to a New Wind

The escalation reaches its climax: a fifth sun dries the great ocean itself, a sixth scorches the earth and Mount Sumeru into smoke, and a seventh, final sun ignites everything at once — earth, Sumeru, and the entire Brahma-heaven — burning without a trace of residue, exactly as oil consumed by flame leaves nothing behind. Twenty destruction-eons complete, twenty eons of pure emptiness follow — until, at their own close, a subtle wind begins to stir once more in the empty space below, marking the quiet beginning of an entirely new world's formation.

Chinese Source

由此大地妙高山王等。一時焰發中表烔燃。乃至梵宮悉皆焚蕩。上從梵世下至風輪。周遍燒燃無餘灰燼。如酥油等燒燃盡時。無有遺餘。此亦如是。爾時欲界初靜慮中。皆悉空虛。都無所有。二十壞劫此時已度。二十空劫從此為初。問幾劫壞有情。幾劫壞器。有說。十劫壞有情。十劫壞器。有說。十五劫壞有情。五劫壞器。如是說者。十九劫壞有情。一劫壞器。別業難轉。非共業故如是世界壞經久時。於下空中有微風起。二十空劫此時已度。二十成劫從此為初。所起微風漸廣漸厚。時經久遠盤結成輪。厚十六億踰繕那量。廣則無數。其體堅密。假設有一大諾健那。以金剛輪奮威懸擊。金剛有碎風輪無損。次有雲起雨風輪上。滴如車軸積水成輪。

Ru-Yi Translation

— and, on account of this, the great earth and Mount Sumeru itself, all at once, burst into flame both within and without, blazing everywhere, until even the Brahma-heaven is entirely consumed — from the Brahma-world above down to the wind-wheel below, everything burns completely, leaving not so much as ash behind, just as ghee or oil, when fully consumed by fire, leaves no residue whatsoever, so too it is here. At that time, the desire realm and the first dhyāna alike stand entirely empty, void, and desolate — this marks the completion of the twenty destruction-eons, and the beginning of the twenty emptiness-eons from this point. Question: how many eons destroy beings, and how many destroy the physical world? Some say: ten eons destroy beings, and ten destroy the physical world. Others say: fifteen eons destroy beings, and five destroy the physical world. According to this final account: nineteen eons destroy beings, and only one destroys the physical world, since individual karma is more difficult to exhaust than collective karma. Thus, after the world has remained destroyed for a long span of time, a subtle wind arises within the empty space below — this marks the completion of the twenty emptiness-eons, and the beginning of the twenty formation-eons from this point. This subtle wind gradually broadens and thickens, and, after a vast span of time, coils and compacts itself into a wheel sixteen hundred million yojanas thick, of immeasurable breadth, its substance hard and dense — such that, were a great mythical demigod to strike it with all his might using a vajra-wheel, the vajra itself would shatter while the wind-wheel remained entirely undamaged. Clouds then gather and rain down upon this wind-wheel, each drop as large as a cart-axle, gradually accumulating into a water-wheel.

Reading note — Ru-Yi

The transition from total, silent emptiness to a single subtle wind stirring in the void is one of this cosmology's most quietly powerful images: after twenty entire eons in which nothing whatsoever exists, the return of a new world begins not with any dramatic act of creation, but with the faintest possible motion — a reminder that, in this tradition, even the largest beginnings start as small as anything can.

15. Out of Emptiness: Water, Gold, and the Rise of Mount Sumeru

The re-formation of the cosmos unfolds with extraordinary precision: the subtle wind compacts over vast ages into an immense, virtually indestructible wind-wheel; clouds gather and rain forms an enormous water-wheel above it; a further wind churns the water's own upper layer into solid gold; more rain and wind then differentiate the remaining materials into Mount Sumeru itself — its four faces gold, silver, lapis lazuli, and crystal, Jambudvīpa's own blue sky merely a reflection of Sumeru's lapis-lazuli face — surrounded by seven rings of golden mountains, four great continents, an outer iron mountain-wall, and eight seas of sweet and salt water, before finally rising, terrace by terrace, to Sumeru's own eighty-thousand-yojana summit, home to the city of Sudarśana.

Chinese Source

如是水輪於未凝結位。深十一億二萬踰繕那。有說。廣量與風輪等有言。狹小分百俱胝。百俱胝輪。其量皆等。謂徑十二億三千四百半圍量三倍。謂三十六億一萬三百五十踰繕那。此不傍流。由有情業力。有餘師說。由風力所摶。次於水輪。有別風起。摶擊此水上結成金。此即金輪厚三億二萬。水輪遂減唯深八洛叉。有說。金輪廣如水量。有師復說。少廣水輪。次有雲起雨金輪上。滴如車軸經於久時。積水浩然深過八萬。猛風攢擊寶等變生。復有異風析令區別謂分寶土成諸山洲。分水甘醎為內外海。初四妙寶成蘇迷盧。挺出海中處金輪上。謂四面如次北東南西金銀吠琉璃頗胝迦寶。隨寶威德色現於空。故贍部洲空似吠琉璃色。此山出水八萬踰繕那。水中亦然。端嚴可愛。次以金寶成七金山。遶蘇迷盧住金輪上。在水中量同蘇迷盧。出水相望各半半減。次以土等成四大洲。下據金輪遶金山外。最後以鐵成輪圍山。在四洲外如牆圍遶。出水半減第七金山。在水量同蘇迷盧等。諸山廣量皆與出水量同。七金山間有七內海。八功德水盈滿其中。七金山外有醎外海。此八大海各深八萬。前七廣量如所遶山。第八有說。廣三億二萬二千踰繕那。有說。更增千二百八十七踰繕那半。蘇迷盧山有四層級。初層傍出一萬六千。次上三層各半半減。四層相去量各十千。有說。初層下齊水量。次二去下量各十千。其第四層去下二萬。四層四面如妙高山。四寶所成莊嚴殊妙。四層如次。堅手持鬘。恒憍。四王天眾居止持雙山等七金山上。亦有四王所部村邑。七山四級日月等天。皆是四大王眾天攝故。欲天中此天最廣。從第四層級復有四萬踰繕那。至蘇迷盧頂。是三十三天住處。山頂四面各二十千。若據周圍數成八萬。有餘師說。面各八十千。與下際四邊其量正等。山頂四角各有一峯。其高廣量各有五百。有藥叉神名金剛手。於中止住守護諸天。於山頂中有城名善見。面二千半周萬踰繕那。金城量高踰繕那半。其地平坦真金所成。俱用百一雜寶嚴飾。地觸柔軟如妬羅綿。躡時齊膝隨足高下。有微風起吹去萎華。引新妙華彌散其地。

Ru-Yi Translation

This water-wheel, before congealing, measures eleven hundred and twenty thousand yojanas deep. Some say its breadth equals that of the wind-wheel; some say it is somewhat narrower, measuring precisely a hundred million times a hundred million in scale, its diameter one billion two hundred and thirty-four thousand yojanas, its circumference three times that, namely three billion six hundred and ten thousand three hundred fifty yojanas — held in place, without flowing outward, by the power of beings' own karma, or, as other masters say, by the compacting force of wind. Next, a distinct wind arises from within the water-wheel, churning and compacting its upper portion into gold — this becomes the golden wheel, three hundred and twenty thousand yojanas thick, while the water-wheel correspondingly shrinks to a depth of only eight hundred thousand yojanas. Some say the golden wheel's breadth equals the water's own measure; others say it is somewhat broader than the water. Clouds then gather and rain down upon this golden wheel, each drop as large as a cart-axle, and, after a vast span of time, the accumulated waters swell to a depth exceeding eighty thousand yojanas — a fierce wind then churns and compacts the various precious materials, causing them to arise, and a further, distinct wind then divides and differentiates them, separating the precious earth into various mountains and continents, and dividing the waters into sweet and salt, inner and outer seas. First, four wondrous jewels combine to form Mount Sumeru, rising up from the sea, resting upon the golden wheel — its four faces, in order, north, east, south, and west, made of gold, silver, lapis lazuli, and crystal respectively, each face's own radiant color reflected in the sky above it, and hence the sky over Jambudvīpa appears the color of lapis lazuli. This mountain rises eighty thousand yojanas above the water, and extends the same depth below it, dignified and beautiful. Next, seven golden mountains form of precious gold, encircling Sumeru, resting upon the golden wheel, equal to Sumeru in their depth beneath the water, but each rising above the water only half the height of the one within it. Next, the four great continents form of ordinary earth, resting upon the golden wheel, encircling the golden mountains outside them. Finally, a ring of iron mountains forms, encircling the four continents from outside like a containing wall, rising above the water only half the height of the seventh golden mountain, though equal to Sumeru in its depth beneath the water — each mountain's breadth equaling its own height above the water. Between the seven golden mountains are seven inner seas, filled with water of the eight virtues; outside the seven golden mountains is the salty outer sea. These eight great seas are each eighty thousand yojanas deep; the first seven are as broad as the mountains they encircle; the eighth, some say, is three hundred and twenty-two thousand yojanas broad, others say it is broader still by twelve hundred eighty-seven and a half yojanas. Mount Sumeru has four terraces — the first projecting outward sixteen thousand yojanas, each of the upper three projecting half as far as the one below it, each terrace ten thousand yojanas apart from the next. Some say the first terrace is level with the water's own surface, the next two each ten thousand yojanas above that, and the fourth twenty thousand yojanas above that. Each of the four terraces, on all four sides, resembles Sumeru itself, formed of the four jewels, wondrously adorned — the four terraces named, in order, Dṛḍha, Mālādhara, Sadāmatta, and the dwelling-place of the retinue of the Four Great Kings, upon the Holding-Twin Mountains and the other six golden mountains, where the Four Kings' own villages and towns are also found. The gods of sun, moon, and the rest, dwelling upon these seven mountains and four terraces, all belong to the Heaven of the Four Great Kings — the broadest of all the desire-realm heavens. Forty thousand yojanas above the fourth terrace lies the summit of Mount Sumeru, the dwelling-place of the Thirty-Three Gods — the summit's four sides each twenty thousand yojanas, or, by its full circumference, eighty thousand yojanas; other masters say each side is eighty thousand yojanas, equal in measure to the mountain's own base beneath the water. At each of the summit's four corners rises a single peak, each five hundred yojanas in height and breadth, where the yakṣa spirit named Vajrapāṇi dwells, guarding the gods. At the summit's center lies the city named Sudarśana, its sides each two thousand five hundred yojanas, its circumference ten thousand — its golden walls a yojana and a half in height, its ground level and smooth, formed of pure gold, adorned throughout with a hundred and one kinds of precious jewels, its very ground soft to the touch like kācalindī cotton, yielding beneath the foot to just the depth of the knee and rising back up as the foot lifts, a gentle breeze continually blowing away withered flowers and drawing in fresh, wondrous ones to spread anew across the ground.

Reading note — Ru-Yi

That the sky's own color over Jambudvīpa is explained as nothing more than a reflection cast by one particular face of a distant mountain is a lovely piece of cosmological world-building: an everyday, universally observed fact — the blue of the sky — turns out, within this system, to be evidence of a specific, locatable geographic cause, folding the ordinary experience of looking upward into the same continuous structure as the mountains and seas below it.

16. Śakra's City of a Thousand Gates, the Wish-Granting Tree, and the Hall of Good Dharma

The fascicle closes with a loving, detailed portrait of Sudarśana, Śakra's own celestial capital atop Mount Sumeru — its thousand gates each guarded by five hundred towering yakṣa warriors, its central Vaijayanta Palace outshining every other divine dwelling, its four surrounding pleasure-gardens each with its own wish-fulfilling pond, and, outside the city, the magnificent Pārijāta tree, its fragrance carried a full hundred yojanas downwind, and the Hall of Sudharmā, where the Thirty-Three Gods gather three times each half-month to deliberate on matters of gods and humans alike.

Chinese Source

是天帝釋所都大城。城有千門嚴飾壯麗。門有五百青衣藥叉。勇健端嚴踰繕那量。各嚴鎧仗防守城門。於其城中有殊勝殿。種種妙寶具足莊嚴。蔽餘天宮故號殊勝。面二百五十。周千踰繕那。其城四隅有四臺觀。以金銀等四寶所成。種種莊嚴甚可愛樂。城外四面四苑莊嚴。是彼諸天共遊戲處。一眾車苑。謂此苑中隨天福力種種車現。二麁惡苑。天欲戰時隨其所須甲仗等現。三雜林苑。諸天入中所玩皆同俱生勝喜。四喜林苑。極妙欲塵殊類皆集歷觀無厭。如是四苑形皆正方。一一周千踰繕那量。中央各有一如意池。面各五十踰繕那量。八功德水盈滿其中。隨欲妙花寶舟好鳥。一一奇麗種種莊嚴。四苑四邊有四妙地。中間去苑各二十踰繕那。地一一邊量皆二百。是諸天眾勝遊戲所。諸天於彼捔勝歡娛。城外東北有圓生樹。是三十三天受欲樂處。盤根深廣五踰繕那。聳幹上昇枝條傍布。高廣量等百踰繕那。舒葉開花妙香芬馥。順風熏滿百踰繕那。

Ru-Yi Translation

This is the great capital city of Śakra, lord of the gods — the city has a thousand gates, magnificently adorned, each guarded by five hundred blue-robed yakṣas, valiant and dignified, a full yojana in stature, each armored and armed, defending the gates. Within the city stands the Vaijayanta Palace, adorned throughout with every kind of wondrous jewel, so surpassing every other heavenly dwelling that it is called "Surpassing Excellence" — its sides two hundred and fifty yojanas, its circumference a thousand. At the city's four corners stand four towers, formed of gold, silver, and the other precious materials, adorned in every way, exceedingly lovely to behold. Outside the city, on its four sides, are four adorned gardens, where the gods gather to play — first, the Chariot Garden, where every kind of chariot manifests according to each god's own merit and fortune; second, the Coarse Garden, where armor and weapons manifest as needed whenever the gods wish to go to war; third, the Mixed-Forest Garden, where the gods, entering within, share the same innate, co-arising delight in whatever they enjoy; and fourth, the Grove-of-Joy Garden, where the most exquisite objects of sensory pleasure of every kind gather together, endlessly fascinating to behold. These four gardens are each square in shape, each with a circumference of a thousand yojanas, and each has, at its center, a single wish-fulfilling pond, its sides each fifty yojanas, filled with water of the eight virtues, with wondrous flowers appearing according to one's own wish, jeweled boats, and beautiful birds, each singular and marvelous, adorned in every way. Around the four sides of each garden lie four exquisite grounds, each twenty yojanas from the garden itself, each side of these grounds measuring two hundred yojanas — the gods' own supreme playground, where they compete and delight together. Northeast of the city stands the Pārijāta tree, the place where the Thirty-Three Gods enjoy their sensory pleasures — its roots coiling deep and wide across five yojanas, its trunk rising skyward, its branches spreading outward, its height and breadth together equal to a hundred yojanas, its unfurled leaves and blossoming flowers releasing an exquisite, fragrant scent, which, carried on a following wind, perfumes an area of a full hundred yojanas,

若逆風時猶遍五十。城外西南角有大善法堂。三十三天常於半月八日十四日十五日。集此堂中詳辨人天。及制伏阿素洛等。如法不如法事如是等類餘處廣說。

— or, against a headwind, still a full fifty yojanas. At the city's southwest corner stands the great Hall of Sudharmā, where the Thirty-Three Gods regularly gather, on the eighth, fourteenth, and fifteenth days of each half-month, to deliberate carefully upon matters concerning gods and humans, and to subdue the asuras and adjudicate matters of proper and improper conduct — such matters as these are explained in full elsewhere.

Reading note — Ru-Yi

Ending an account of universal cosmic destruction and re-formation with this warm, almost domestic inventory of gardens, ponds, and a fragrant tree is a deliberate tonal choice: after twenty eons of emptiness and a fire that leaves no residue, the cosmology comes to rest not on any further abstraction but on the concrete, sensory pleasures of a single beautifully furnished city — cosmic time, having run its full course, arrives back at something as intimate as a garden.

Fascicle 133 Complete

This closes fascicle 133 of Ru-Yi's translation, drawn from the treatise's true CBETA boundary. Fascicle 133 continues the Condition Nyāsa (緣納息第二之三): completing the realm- and time-based condition catalog, a famous distinction between the everyday word and the ultimate substance for each of the four elements (with a brahmin's own verse on reading omens in fire), practical puzzles about washing and burning, and one of Abhidharma cosmology's grandest set-pieces — why earth alone can never become a world-ending calamity, the precise mechanics and rhythm of universal destruction by fire, water, and wind, the re-formation of Mount Sumeru from emptiness, and the loving description of Śakra's celestial city, Sudarśana. Fascicle 134 continues within this same nyāsa.