Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 4.53

Living Together (1st)

Paṭhamasaṁvāsasutta — Puññābhisandavagga — the sixth chapter of the Fours

Setting
On the road between Madhurā and Verañjā, at the root of a tree, with householders both women and men travelling the same way
Speakers
The Buddha, addressing householders
Form
A two-by-two grid of marriages, each defined by conduct, with six verses
Length
~4 minutes to read
Northern parallel
The four saṁvāsa appear in the Chinese Āgamas; this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — plain in structure, with one translation choice that needs explaining

Why this discourse

Four kinds of marriage, named by what each partner is: a corpse living with a corpse, a corpse with a goddess, a god with a corpse, a god with a goddess. The grid is symmetrical and the criterion is entirely ethical — the five precepts, stinginess, and how one treats ascetics and brahmins. It is one of the few discourses addressed to a mixed lay audience by the roadside, and the symmetry of its treatment of husband and wife is worth noticing.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

A marriage is characterized by the ethical condition of each partner independently, and there are four possible combinations.

‘Zombie’ and what it translates

The Pāli is chava, a corpse or carcass, used as a term of abuse — roughly ‘wretch’ with the force of ‘dead thing’. Sujato’s ‘zombie’ is a deliberate and unusual choice; other translators have used ‘wretch’, ‘corpse’, or ‘wretched man’.

The rendering is defensible and worth understanding rather than either adopting or dismissing. What chava conveys is a living person described as a dead one, which is exactly the modern sense of the word Sujato chose; ‘corpse’ loses the fact that the person is walking around, and ‘wretch’ loses the death.

It is fair to say the English carries connotations from film that the Pāli does not, and a teacher may reasonably prefer to give both the Pāli and a plainer gloss. What should not be lost is the harshness. The discourse is not being gentle: it calls an unethical husband or wife a dead thing.

The criterion

For each partner the description is the same and it has three parts: the five precepts (killing, stealing, sexual misconduct, lying, intoxicants); living at home with the heart full of the stain of stinginess; and abusing and insulting ascetics and brahmins.

So: personal conduct, disposition toward one’s own household, and behavior toward the religious. It is a lay standard, appropriate to the audience, and it is the same for both partners without a single word of difference.

That symmetry is the discourse’s quietest and strongest feature. Nothing in it assigns a different standard to husband and wife, and the four cells of the grid are given equal treatment: a good wife with a bad husband and a good husband with a bad wife each get their own cell, their own definition, and their own verse. For a text of its period this is worth pointing out.

The verses and where the imbalance appears

The verses run the same four cases and here a small asymmetry does show. When the husband is unethical and the wife is not, she’s a goddess living with a zombie for a husband. When the husband is ethical and the wife is not, she’s a zombie living with a god for a husband.

Both verses are told from the wife’s position — she is the subject in each — whereas the prose named the husband first throughout. That is a difference of framing rather than of standard, and it is the kind of detail worth noticing without building much on it.

The fourth verse is the one usually quoted: when both are faithful and bountiful, disciplined, living righteously, then wife and husband say nice things to each other. The Pāli is piyaṁvadā, speaking pleasantly — and it is notable that what the discourse names as the result of shared ethics is neither prosperity nor rebirth but how the two of them talk.

The rest of the good outcome

The following verses do add the material results: needs amply satisfied, living at ease, enemies downhearted, and finally delight in the heavenly realm.

Their enemies are downhearted is an unusual line and worth pausing on. The assumption is that a household has adversaries and that a well-ordered one disappoints them. This is a discourse for people with property, obligations, and rivals, and it does not pretend otherwise.

The setting

The Buddha is travelling between Madhurā and Verañjā, leaves the road, and sits under a tree; householders travelling the same way see him and come over. The teaching is given on the roadside to whoever happened to be walking.

That is worth registering because it explains the pitch. There is no request, no question, and no prior relationship. The discourse is what the Buddha says to a group of married lay people he has just met, and its content — a simple grid, a memorable and slightly rude image, verses that can be carried away — is shaped for exactly that.

AN 4.54, immediately next, gives the same grid to mendicants with the ten courses of action in place of the five precepts. The pair shows the collection adapting one teaching to two audiences.

Key terms

chava — “zombie” — literally a corpse, used as abuse. A living person described as a dead one; other translators use ‘wretch’ or ‘corpse’.
devī — “goddess” — the opposite term, with deva for the husband; the grid is built on this single pair.
saṁvāsa — “living together” — the word for cohabitation and for marriage, and the title of both this discourse and the next.
maccheramala — “the stain of stinginess” — the disposition named alongside the precepts, and the one that concerns the household itself.
piyaṁvadā — “saying nice things to each other” — speaking pleasantly; what the discourse names as the first result of shared ethics.

The text

The discourse in full: the roadside setting, the four kinds of living together, and the verses. The ellipses are the Pāli’s own abbreviation. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

On the road

§1At one time the Buddha was traveling along the road between Madhurā and Verañjā, as were several householders, both women and men. The Buddha left the road and sat at the root of a tree, where the householders saw him. They went up to the Buddha, bowed, and sat down to one side. The Buddha said to them:

Four ways of living together

§2“Householders, there are four ways of living together. What four? A male zombie living with a female zombie; a male zombie living with a goddess; a god living with a female zombie; a god living with a goddess.

§3And how does a male zombie live with a female zombie? It’s when the husband kills living creatures, steals, commits sexual misconduct, lies, and consumes beer, wine, and liquor intoxicants. He’s unethical, of bad character, living at home with his heart full of the stain of stinginess, abusing and insulting ascetics and brahmins. And the wife is also … unethical, of bad character … That’s how a male zombie lives with a female zombie.

§4And how does a male zombie live with a goddess? It’s when the husband … is unethical, of bad character … But the wife doesn’t kill living creatures, steal, commit sexual misconduct, lie, or consume beer, wine, and liquor intoxicants. She’s ethical, of good character, living at home with her heart rid of the stain of stinginess, not abusing and insulting ascetics and brahmins. That’s how a male zombie lives with a goddess.

§5And how does a god live with a female zombie? It’s when the husband … is ethical, of good character … But the wife … is unethical, of bad character … That’s how a god lives with a female zombie.

§6And how does a god live with a goddess? It’s when the husband … is ethical, of good character … And the wife is also … ethical, of good character … That’s how a god lives with a goddess. These are the four ways of living together.

The verses

§7When both are unethical, miserly and abusive, then wife and husband live together as zombies. When the husband is unethical, miserly and abusive, but the wife is ethical, bountiful, rid of stinginess, she’s a goddess living with a zombie for a husband. When the husband is ethical, bountiful, rid of stinginess, but the wife is unethical, miserly and abusive, she’s a zombie living with a god for a husband.

§8When both are faithful and bountiful, disciplined, living righteously, then wife and husband say nice things to each other. Their needs are amply satisfied, so they live at ease. Their enemies are downhearted, when both are equal in ethics. Having practiced the teaching here, both equal in precepts and observances, they delight in the heavenly realm, enjoying all the pleasures they desire.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What are the four ways of living together?
Correct: B. A two-by-two grid built on a single pair of terms.
Question 2 of 10
What does chava literally mean?
Correct: B. A living person described as a dead one.
Question 3 of 10
How does the guide assess Sujato’s ‘zombie’?
Correct: B. What should not be lost is the harshness.
Question 4 of 10
What three parts make up the criterion for each partner?
Correct: B. Personal conduct, disposition toward one’s household, and behavior toward the religious.
Question 5 of 10
What does the guide call the discourse’s quietest and strongest feature?
Correct: B. For a text of its period this is worth pointing out.
Question 6 of 10
What small asymmetry appears in the verses?
Correct: B. A difference of framing rather than of standard.
Question 7 of 10
What is named as the first result of shared ethics?
Correct: B. Piyaṁvadā — neither prosperity nor rebirth but how the two of them talk.
Question 8 of 10
What is unusual about ‘their enemies are downhearted’?
Correct: B. A discourse for people with property, obligations, and rivals.
Question 9 of 10
How did the teaching come to be given?
Correct: B. No request, no question, and no prior relationship.
Question 10 of 10
How does AN 4.54 differ from this discourse?
Correct: B. The pair shows one teaching adapted to two audiences.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0