Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 5.124

A Carer (2nd)

Dutiyaupaṭṭhākasutta — Gilānavagga — the thirteenth chapter of the Fives

Setting
None stated; the discourse continues from AN 5.1, whose setting at Sāvatthī in Jeta’s Grove is understood to hold
Speakers
The Buddha alone, addressing the mendicants
Form
two paired five-item lists, the carer's counterpart to AN 5.123's patient discourse
Length
~1 minute to read
Northern parallel
not identified in this collection
Difficulty
★☆☆☆☆ — practical and frank

Why this discourse

The mirror-image companion to AN 5.123: five qualities of an incompetent carer, and five of a competent one, spanning practical skill, motivation, physical willingness, and the ability to genuinely encourage a suffering patient.

Reading guide

The carer's side of the relationship

Where AN 5.123 assessed the patient, this discourse assesses the carer, completing a matched pair on the whole nursing relationship.

Five incompetent qualities

Unable to prepare medicine; unable to tell suitable from unsuitable, so supplying the wrong one and removing the right one; caring for material benefit rather than out of love; disgusted by removing feces, urine, vomit, or spit; and unable to educate, encourage, and inspire the patient with Dhamma talk from time to time.

A frank acknowledgment of what care actually involves

The discourse names bodily fluids directly and without euphemism — being disgusted by them is treated plainly as a genuine disqualification, not merely an understandable squeamishness. Real nursing care is described as requiring willingness to do exactly this.

Motivation named explicitly

The distinction between caring ‘for material benefit’ and caring ‘out of love’ (mettacitta) is stated as a moral criterion in its own right, not merely a matter of competence.

The mirrored positive

Able to prepare medicine, correctly distinguishing suitable from unsuitable, motivated by love rather than gain, undisgusted by bodily fluids, and able to give genuinely inspiring Dhamma talks.

What comes next

AN 5.125 shifts from the specific relationship of patient and carer to a broader question: what factors, in general, impede or promote a long life.

Key terms

bhesajjaṁ saṁvidhātuṁ — “to prepare medicine” — the first competence assessed.
āmisantaro — “for material benefit” — the disqualifying motivation, contrasted with love.
mettacitta — “a mind of love” — the required, positive motivation.
jegucchī — “disgusted” — the disqualifying reaction to bodily fluids.
dhammiyā kathāya sandassetuṁ — “to educate with a Dhamma talk” — the fifth competence, spiritual as well as practical care.

The text

The discourse in full: five qualities of an incompetent carer, and their opposite. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

Not competent to care for a patient

§1“Mendicants, a carer with five qualities is not competent to care for a patient. What five? They’re unable to prepare medicine. They don’t know what is suitable and unsuitable, so they supply what is unsuitable and remove what is suitable. They care for the sick for the sake of material benefits, not out of love. They’re disgusted to remove feces, urine, vomit, or spit. They’re unable to educate, encourage, fire up, and inspire the patient with a Dhamma talk from time to time. A carer with these five qualities is not competent to care for a patient.

Competent to care for a patient

§2A carer with five qualities is competent to care for a patient. What five? They’re able to prepare medicine. They know what is suitable and unsuitable, so they remove what is unsuitable and supply what is suitable. They care for the sick out of love, not for the sake of material benefits. They’re not disgusted to remove feces, urine, vomit, or spit. They’re able to educate, encourage, fire up, and inspire the patient with a Dhamma talk from time to time. A carer with these five qualities is competent to care for a patient.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What relationship does this discourse assess, compared to AN 5.123?
Correct: B. The matched, mirror-image companion discourse.
Question 2 of 10
What is the first incompetent quality named?
Correct: A. A basic practical skill.
Question 3 of 10
How does the discourse describe someone disqualified by disgust?
Correct: B. Real nursing requires willingness to handle bodily fluids directly.
Question 4 of 10
What two motivations does the discourse explicitly contrast?
Correct: A. Āmisantaro vs. mettacitto.
Question 5 of 10
What is the fifth competence named?
Correct: A. Spiritual care alongside practical skill.
Question 6 of 10
What does 'mettacitta' mean?
Correct: A. The required positive motivation for genuine care.
Question 7 of 10
What bodily substances does the discourse name explicitly?
Correct: A. Named directly and without euphemism.
Question 8 of 10
How is the competent-carer list constructed relative to the incompetent one?
Correct: B. A clean, explicit mirror.
Question 9 of 10
What is 'āmisantaro'?
Correct: A. The disqualifying motivation.
Question 10 of 10
What does AN 5.125 shift to next?
Correct: B. Beyond the specific patient-carer relationship.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0