Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 6.54

About Dhammika

Dhammikasutta — Dhammikavagga — the fifth chapter of the Sixes

Setting
Rājagaha, on Vulture's Peak Mountain
Speakers
The Buddha, addressing Venerable Dhammika, who has just arrived
Form
A frame narrative of repeated banishment, a bird simile, an extended parable of a banyan tree, and its direct application
Length
~7 minutes to read
Northern parallel
Parables of a tree failing its community after being wronged by one person recur in related form across Buddhist narrative literature broadly, including the Chinese Āgamas; this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★★☆☆ — the longest and most narratively complex discourse in this chapter, closing the First Fifty on an extended parable rather than a formula

Why this discourse

Venerable Dhammika abuses every visiting mendicant at every one of the seven monasteries in his native land, and is banished from each in turn, finally banished from all seven at once. With nowhere left to go, he seeks out the Buddha — who responds not with reproach but with a bird simile and then a long parable about a magnificent banyan tree, felled by a storm after its resident deity, angered by one person's disrespect, wished it would stop bearing fruit for everyone. The parable's point turns out to be exactly Dhammika's own situation, examined from an unexpected angle.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

An ascetic's actual duty is not to retaliate when abused, annoyed, or argued with — and Dhammika, banished from seven monasteries for doing the opposite, is shown through the parable of a banyan tree that a single guardian's overreaction to one bad actor can cost an entire community what it depended on.

The bird released from a ship, first

Before the main parable, the Buddha offers a smaller image: sea-merchants release a land-spotting bird from a ship out of sight of land; it searches every direction, and returns to the ship only if it finds no land anywhere. Applied to Dhammika, banished everywhere else, coming to the Buddha is framed not as a special honor sought but as the last remaining option after every other has been exhausted — a notably unflattering opening to what becomes an extended teaching.

The banyan tree: shared abundance, undone by one bad actor

King Koravya's royal banyan tree fed an entire community — king, troops, townspeople, ascetics, even animals, each from their own trunk, unguarded and undamaged by mutual restraint — until one person ate his fill, then broke off a branch out of simple carelessness on his way out. The tree's resident deity, outraged, wished the tree would bear no more fruit for anyone, and it stopped.

Sakka's question, and the deity's true fault

When the felled, fruitless tree is uprooted by a storm Sakka arranges, the grieving deity is asked a pointed question: did you stand by a tree's duty? A tree's duty, Sakka explains, is to let anyone take root, bark, leaves, flowers, or fruit as needed, without displeasure — even from someone who takes more than their share. The deity's fault was not misjudging the one bad actor, but withdrawing shared abundance from everyone in response to one person's carelessness.

The application, and the six teachers who follow

The Buddha states the parallel to Dhammika directly: were you standing by an ascetic's duty — not retaliating when abused — when the lay followers banished you? Dhammika admits he was not. The Buddha then names six ancient teachers, each with hundreds of disciples, and states that insulting any one of them with malicious intent brims with wickedness — but insulting a single individual “accomplished in view,” a fellow spiritual companion, brims with even more, because “any injury done by those outside of the Buddhist community does not compare with what is done to one's own spiritual companions.”

Key terms

assaddhamma — not directly named in this English rendering but the implicit charge against Dhammika's own conduct: behavior contrary to the true teaching, specifically retaliation.
samaṇadhamma — “an ascetic's duty” — the specific standard Dhammika is asked whether he upheld, defined as not retaliating when abused, annoyed, or argued with.
rukkhadhamma — “a tree's duty” — Sakka's parallel standard for the tree-deity: letting all take what they need from roots, bark, leaves, flowers, or fruit without displeasure.
suppatiṭṭhita — “well planted” — the name of King Koravya's royal banyan tree, before it lost its fruit and was later restored.
diṭṭhisampanna — “accomplished in view” — the discourse's term for the single individual whose insult brims with even more wickedness than insulting six famous non-Buddhist teachers together.

The text

The discourse in full: Dhammika's repeated banishment, the bird simile, the banyan tree parable, and its direct application. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

Banished from seven monasteries

§1At one time the Buddha was staying near Rājagaha, on the Vulture’s Peak Mountain. Now at that time Venerable Dhammika was a resident in all seven monasteries of his native land. There he abused visiting mendicants; he insulted, harmed, attacked, and harassed them. The visiting mendicants who were treated in this way did not stay. They left, abandoning the monastery. Then the local lay followers thought to themselves, “We have supplied the mendicant Saṅgha with robes, almsfood, lodgings, and medicines and supplies for the sick. But the visiting mendicants don’t stay. They leave, abandoning the monastery. What is the cause, what is the reason for this?” Then the local lay followers thought to themselves, “This Venerable Dhammika abuses visiting mendicants; he insults, harms, attacks, and harasses them. The visiting mendicants who were treated in this way do not stay. They leave, abandoning the monastery. Why don’t we banish Venerable Dhammika?” Then the local lay followers went up to Venerable Dhammika and said to him, “Sir, please leave this monastery. You’ve stayed here long enough.” Then Venerable Dhammika left and went to another monastery. There he abused visiting mendicants; he insulted, harmed, attacked, and harassed them. The visiting mendicants who were treated in this way did not stay. They left, abandoning the monastery. Then the local lay followers thought to themselves: … They said to Venerable Dhammika, “Sir, please leave this monastery. You’ve stayed here long enough.” Then Venerable Dhammika left and went to another monastery. There he abused visiting mendicants; he insulted, harmed, attacked, and harassed them. The visiting mendicants who were treated in this way did not stay. They left, abandoning the monastery. Then the local lay followers thought to themselves, “Why don’t we banish Venerable Dhammika from all seven monasteries in our native land?” Then the local lay followers went up to Venerable Dhammika and said to him, “Sir, please leave all seven monasteries in our native land.” Then Venerable Dhammika thought, “I’ve been banished by the local lay followers from all seven monasteries in my native land. Where am I to go now?” He thought, “Why don’t I go to see the Buddha?”

The bird released from a ship

§2Then Venerable Dhammika took his bowl and robe and set out for Rājagaha. Eventually he came to Rājagaha and the Vulture’s Peak. He went up to the Buddha, bowed, and sat down to one side. The Buddha said to him, “So, Brahmin Dhammika, where have you come from?” “Sir, I’ve been banished by the local lay followers from all seven monasteries in my native land.” “Enough, Brahmin Dhammika, what’s that to you? Now that you’ve been banished from all of those places, you have come to me. Once upon a time, some sea-merchants set sail for the ocean deeps, taking with them a land-spotting bird. When their ship was out of sight of land, they released the bird. It flew right away to the east, the west, the north, the south, upwards, and in-between. If it saw land on any side, it went there and stayed. But if it saw no land on any side it returned to the ship. In the same way, now that you’ve been banished from all of those places, you have come to me.

The banyan tree, and Sakka's storm

§3Once upon a time, King Koravya had a royal banyan tree with five trunks called ‘Well Planted’. It was shady and lovely. Its canopy spread over twelve leagues, while the network of roots spread for five leagues. Its fruits were as large as a rice pot. And they were as sweet as pure wild honey. The king and harem made use of one trunk, the troops another, the people of town and country another, ascetics and brahmins another, and beasts and birds another. No-one guarded the fruit, yet no-one damaged another’s fruits. Then a certain person ate as much as he liked of the fruit, then broke off a branch and left. Then the deity haunting the royal banyan tree thought, ‘Oh lord, how incredible, how amazing! How wicked this person is, to eat as much as they like, then break off a branch and leave! Why don’t I make sure that the royal banyan tree gives no fruit in future?’ Then the royal banyan tree gave no more fruit. Then King Koravya went up to Sakka, lord of gods, and said to him, ‘Please good fellow, you should know that the royal banyan tree called Well Planted gives no fruit.’ Then Sakka used his psychic powers to will that a violent storm come. And it felled and uprooted the royal banyan tree. Then the deity haunting the tree stood to one side, miserable and sad, weeping, with a tearful face. Then Sakka went up to that deity, and said, ‘Why, god, are you standing to one side, miserable and sad, weeping, with a tearful face?’ ‘Because, my good fellow, a violent storm came and felled and uprooted my home.’ ‘Well, did you stand by your tree’s duty when the storm came?’ ‘But my good fellow, how does a tree stand by its duty?’ ‘It’s when those who need the tree’s roots, bark, leaves, flowers, or fruit take what they need. Yet the deity is not displeased or upset because of this. This is how a tree stands by its duty.’ ‘I was not standing by a tree’s duty when the storm came and felled and uprooted my home.’ ‘God, if you were to stand by a tree’s duty, your home may be as it was before.’ ‘I will stand by a tree’s duty! May my home be as it was before!’ Then Sakka used his psychic power to will that a violent storm come. And it raised up that mighty banyan tree and the bark of the roots was healed. In the same way, Brahmin Dhammika, were you standing by an ascetic’s duty when the local lay followers banished you from all seven of the monasteries in your native land?” “But sir, how do I stand by an ascetic’s duty?” “When someone abuses, annoys, or argues with an ascetic, the ascetic doesn’t abuse, annoy, or argue back at them. That’s how an ascetic stands by an ascetic’s duty.” “I was not standing by an ascetic’s duty when the local lay followers banished me from all seven of the monasteries in my native land.” “Once upon a time, there was a teacher named Sunetta. He was a religious founder and was free of desire for sensual pleasures.

The application, and six ancient teachers

§4He had many hundreds of disciples. He taught them the path to rebirth in the company of Divinity. Those lacking confidence in Sunetta were—when their body broke up, after death—reborn in a place of loss, a bad place, the underworld, hell. Those full of confidence in Sunetta were—when their body broke up, after death—reborn in a good place, a heavenly realm. Once upon a time there was a teacher named Mūgapakkha … Aranemi … Kuddālaka … Hatthipāla … Jotipāla. He was a religious founder and was free of desire for sensual pleasures. He had many hundreds of disciples. He taught them the way to rebirth in the company of Divinity. Those lacking confidence in Jotipāla were—when their body broke up, after death—reborn in a place of loss, a bad place, the underworld, hell. Those full of confidence in Jotipāla were—when their body broke up, after death—reborn in a good place, a heavenly realm. What do you think, Brahmin Dhammika? If someone with malicious intent were to abuse and insult these six teachers with their hundreds of followers, would they not brim with much wickedness?” “Yes, sir.” “They would indeed. But someone who abuses and insults a single individual accomplished in view with malicious intent brims even more with wickedness. Why is that? Brahmin Dhammika, I say that any injury done by those outside of the Buddhist community does not compare with what is done to one’s own spiritual companions. So you should train like this: ‘We will have no malicious intent for those who we want to have as our spiritual companions.’ That is how you should train.

The closing verses

§5Sunetta and Mūgapakkha, and Aranemi the brahmin, Hatthipāla the student, and Kuddālaka were Teachers. And Jotipāla Govinda was priest for seven kings. These six famous teachers, harmless ones of the past, were free of putrefaction, compassionate, gone beyond the fetter of sensuality. Detached from sensual desire, they were reborn in the realm of divinity. Many hundreds of their disciples were also free of putrefaction-stench, compassionate, gone beyond the fetter of sensuality. Detached from sensual desire, they were reborn in the realm of divinity. One who insults with malicious intent these non-Buddhist seers, free of desire, immersed in samādhi; such a man brims with much wickedness. But one who insults with malicious intent a single individual accomplished in view, a mendicant disciple of the Buddha; that man brims even more with wickedness. You shouldn’t attack a holy person, who has given up the grounds for views. This individual is called the seventh of the noble Saṅgha. They’re not free of desire for sensual pleasures, and their faculties are still immature: faith, mindfulness, and energy, serenity and discernment. If you attack such a mendicant, you first hurt yourself. Having hurt yourself, you harm the other. But if you protect yourself, the other is also protected. So you should protect yourself. An astute person is always uninjured.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
Why is Venerable Dhammika banished from all seven monasteries in his native land?
Correct: B. A pattern repeated at each of seven monasteries in turn, before total banishment.
Question 2 of 10
What does the bird-released-from-a-ship simile suggest about Dhammika's arrival at the Buddha?
Correct: B. A notably unflattering opening to the teaching that follows.
Question 3 of 10
What happened to King Koravya's banyan tree, and why?
Correct: B. One person's carelessness led the deity to withdraw abundance from the entire community.
Question 4 of 10
According to Sakka, what was the tree-deity's actual fault?
Correct: B. A tree's duty is to let all take what they need without becoming displeased, even from someone taking more than their share.
Question 5 of 10
How does the Buddha apply this parable directly to Dhammika?
Correct: B. A direct parallel: the tree-deity's overreaction mirrors Dhammika's own retaliation against visiting mendicants.
Question 6 of 10
What claim does the Buddha make about insulting the six ancient teachers versus insulting a single individual 'accomplished in view'?
Correct: B. A pointed claim about harm done within one's own spiritual community.
Question 7 of 10
What is samaṇadhamma, an ascetic's duty, defined as in this discourse?
Correct: B. The specific standard Dhammika is asked whether he upheld.
Question 8 of 10
Where is AN 6.54 set?
Correct: B. The location Dhammika finally reaches after being banished from all seven monasteries.
Question 9 of 10
What happens to the banyan tree after Sakka's second storm?
Correct: B. Restoration follows the deity's genuine commitment to the standard Sakka named.
Question 10 of 10
What makes AN 6.54 distinctive within this chapter, according to the guide?
Correct: B. A capstone narrative closing out the Sixes' first major structural division.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0