Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 8.78

Good Enough

Alaṁsutta — Yamakavagga — the eighth chapter of the Eights

Setting
None stated in the source
Speakers
Venerable Sāriputta, addressing the mendicants directly
Form
The identical eight logical cases as AN 8.62, now delivered by Sāriputta
Length
~3 minutes to read
The second Sāriputta-Buddha pair in this chapter
Following AN 8.77's identical relationship to AN 8.61, this discourse does the same for AN 8.62 — Sāriputta teaching content word for word identical to an earlier discourse attributed to the Buddha
Difficulty
★★★★☆ — the same logically intricate content as AN 8.62, now worth comparing for its change of speaker rather than its logical structure

Why this discourse

Sāriputta teaches the mendicants, word for word, the same eight logical cases AN 8.62 attributed to the Buddha: which combinations of six underlying qualities — quick-wittedness, memory, comprehension, practice, eloquence, and inspiring others — make a mendicant good enough for themselves, for others, for both, or for neither.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

Sāriputta delivers the identical eight-case logical teaching as AN 8.62 on his own authority: comprehension, memory, and practice serve self-benefit, eloquence and inspiring others serve other-benefit, and quick-wittedness never changes any case's verdict.

A second matched pair in this chapter

This discourse and AN 8.77 together form a small set within this chapter: two discourses whose content is word-for-word identical to earlier discourses in this same book (AN 8.61 and AN 8.62 respectively), differing only in that Sāriputta, not the Buddha, is the speaker.

The same logical structure, unchanged

Every element of AN 8.62's intricate cascading structure — six qualities down through five, four, three, and two, each combination assigned its own verdict for self- and other-benefit — appears here exactly as before, with Sāriputta's own opening address to “reverends” the only textual marker distinguishing this discourse from its earlier counterpart.

Why this pairing pattern recurs exactly twice

That this book pairs exactly two of Sāriputta's own teachings with exactly two earlier Buddha-attributed discourses (AN 8.61/8.77 and AN 8.62/8.78) — rather than one, or many — suggests a deliberate, bounded demonstration of Sāriputta's capacity to teach precisely, not an open-ended pattern extending indefinitely through this chapter.

Key terms

sāriputto — Venerable Sāriputta, this discourse's own speaker, as at AN 8.77 immediately preceding it.
khippanisanti dhammesu — “quick-witted when it comes to skillful teachings” — the one quality whose presence or absence never changes any case's verdict, identical to AN 8.62's own finding.
alaṁ attano, alaṁ parassa — “good enough for themselves... good enough for others” — the identical dual verdict as AN 8.62, unchanged in this discourse.
cha dhammehi samannāgato — “with six qualities” — the discourse's own opening case, cascading down through five, four, three, and two as at AN 8.62.
āvuso, bhikkhave — “reverends, mendicants” — Sāriputta's own address, the clearest textual marker distinguishing this discourse from AN 8.62.

The text

The discourse in full: Sāriputta's own teaching of the same eight cases as AN 8.62. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

Six and five qualities: good enough for both

§1There Sāriputta addressed the mendicants: “Reverends, a mendicant with six qualities is good enough for themselves and others. What six? A mendicant is quick-witted when it comes to skillful teachings. They readily memorize the teachings they’ve heard. They examine the meaning of teachings they’ve memorized. Understanding the meaning and the teaching, they practice in line with the teaching. They’re a good speaker who enunciates well. Their voice is polished, clear, articulate, and expresses the meaning. They educate, encourage, fire up, and inspire their spiritual companions. A mendicant with these six qualities is good enough for themselves and others. A mendicant with five qualities is good enough for themselves and others. What five? A mendicant is not quick-witted when it comes to skillful teachings. They readily memorize the teachings they’ve heard. They examine the meaning of teachings they’ve memorized. Understanding the meaning and the teaching, they practice in line with the teaching. They’re a good speaker. Their voice is polished, clear, articulate, and expresses the meaning. They educate, encourage, fire up, and inspire their spiritual companions. A mendicant with these five qualities is good enough for themselves and others.

Four qualities, split two ways

§2A mendicant with four qualities is good enough for themselves but not for others. What four? A mendicant is quick-witted when it comes to skillful teachings. They readily memorize the teachings they’ve heard. They examine the meaning of teachings they’ve memorized. Understanding the meaning and the teaching, they practice in line with the teaching. They’re not a good speaker. Their voice isn’t polished, clear, articulate, and doesn’t express the meaning. They don’t educate, encourage, fire up, and inspire their spiritual companions. A mendicant with these four qualities is good enough for themselves but not for others. A mendicant with four qualities is good enough for others but not for themselves. What four? A mendicant is quick-witted when it comes to skillful teachings. They readily memorize the teachings they’ve heard. But they don’t examine the meaning of teachings they’ve memorized. Not understanding the meaning and the teaching, they don’t practice in line with the teaching. They’re a good speaker. Their voice is polished, clear, articulate, and expresses the meaning. They educate, encourage, fire up, and inspire their spiritual companions. A mendicant with these four qualities is good enough for others but not for themselves.

Three qualities, split two ways

§3A mendicant with three qualities is good enough for themselves but not for others. What three? A mendicant is not quick-witted when it comes to skillful teachings. They readily memorize the teachings they’ve heard. They examine the meaning of teachings they’ve memorized. Understanding the meaning and the teaching, they practice in line with the teaching. They’re not a good speaker. Their voice isn’t polished, clear, articulate, and doesn’t express the meaning. They don’t educate, encourage, fire up, and inspire their spiritual companions. A mendicant with these three qualities is good enough for themselves but not for others. A mendicant with three qualities is good enough for others but not for themselves. What three? A mendicant is not quick-witted when it comes to skillful teachings. They readily memorize the teachings they’ve heard. But they don’t examine the meaning of teachings they’ve memorized. Not understanding the meaning and the teaching, they don’t practice in line with the teaching. They’re a good speaker. Their voice is polished, clear, articulate, and expresses the meaning. They educate, encourage, fire up, and inspire their spiritual companions. A mendicant with these three qualities is good enough for others but not for themselves.

Two qualities, split two ways

§4A mendicant with two qualities is good enough for themselves but not for others. What two? A mendicant is not quick-witted when it comes to skillful teachings. And they don’t readily memorize the teachings they’ve heard. They examine the meaning of teachings they’ve memorized. Understanding the meaning and the teaching, they practice in line with the teaching. They’re not a good speaker. Their voice isn’t polished, clear, articulate, and doesn’t express the meaning. They don’t educate, encourage, fire up, and inspire their spiritual companions. A mendicant with these two qualities is good enough for themselves but not for others. A mendicant with two qualities is good enough for others but not for themselves. What two? A mendicant is not quick-witted when it comes to skillful teachings. And they don’t readily memorize the teachings they’ve heard. Nor do they examine the meaning of teachings they’ve memorized. Not understanding the meaning and the teaching, they don’t practice in line with the teaching. They’re a good speaker who enunciates well. Their voice is polished, clear, articulate, and expresses the meaning. They educate, encourage, fire up, and inspire their spiritual companions. A mendicant with these two qualities is good enough for others but not for themselves.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

6 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 6
How does this discourse's content compare to AN 8.62's?
Correct: B. The second of this chapter's two Sāriputta/Buddha content pairs.
Question 2 of 6
What pattern does this discourse and AN 8.77 together establish in this chapter?
Correct: B. A bounded, deliberate demonstration rather than an open-ended repetition.
Question 3 of 6
What quality's presence or absence never changes any case's verdict, matching AN 8.62's own finding?
Correct: B. The identical optional quality found in AN 8.62's structure.
Question 4 of 6
What is the only textual marker distinguishing this discourse from AN 8.62?
Correct: B. The speaker's own address formula, not any change in content.
Question 5 of 6
What two qualities does the guide identify as serving self-benefit and other-benefit respectively?
Correct: B. The same functional split identified at AN 8.62.
Question 6 of 6
Is a setting given for this discourse?
Correct: C. A bare formula, matching AN 8.62's own lack of a stated setting.
Answered 0 of 6 · Correct 0