Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 8.87

Turning the Bowl Upside Down

Pattanikkujjanasutta — Sativagga — the ninth chapter of the Eights

Setting
None stated in the source
Speakers
The Buddha alone, addressing the mendicants
Form
A formal procedural statement: eight grounds for the Saṅgha's collective boycott, then their eight reversals
Length
under 1 minute to read
The first of four Vinaya-adjacent discourses
This discourse opens a distinct closing run in this chapter: four discourses (AN 8.87–90) concerned with formal institutional procedures governing Saṅgha-lay relations and monastic discipline
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — formal and procedural in register, a shift from this chapter's earlier narrative and philosophical material

Why this discourse

AN 8.87 names eight grounds on which the Saṅgha may, if it wishes, collectively refuse a lay follower's offerings — obstructing mendicants' material support, harming them, driving them from a monastery, insulting them, dividing them against each other, or criticizing the Buddha, teaching, or Saṅgha — and their eight reversals, restoring the relationship.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

The Saṅgha may collectively boycott a lay follower — “turning the bowl upside down” to refuse their offerings — on eight grounds of active hostility toward mendicants, and may reverse that boycott once the lay follower stops behaving in these eight ways.

A vivid image for a formal act

“Turning the bowl upside down” names a concrete, visible gesture: an alms bowl normally held open to receive food is instead inverted, signaling refusal. The Saṅgha's formal collective response to hostile lay conduct is expressed through this same physical, unmistakable act rather than an abstract declaration.

Eight grounds, all concerning active hostility

Every one of the eight grounds describes deliberate hostile action toward the mendicant community: obstructing material support, causing harm, driving mendicants away, insulting them, sowing division among them, or criticizing the three refuges directly — not disagreement or criticism in general, but active, targeted hostility.

A reversible, not permanent, procedure

The discourse's second half matters as much as its first: the boycott is explicitly reversible, restored once the lay follower's conduct changes — framing this formal act as a corrective response to specific behavior, not a permanent severing of relationship.

Key terms

pattaṁ nikkujjeyya — “turn the bowl upside down” — this discourse's own title-phrase and central image, a visible gesture of collective refusal.
lābhaṁ pariyesati — “material things” — what the first ground concerns, a lay follower obstructing mendicants' basic material support.
anatthaṁ pariyesati — “tries to harm” — the second ground, direct hostility beyond merely withholding support.
saṅghabhedāya parakkamati — “divides mendicants against each other” — one of the eight grounds, targeting the Saṅgha's own internal unity rather than any individual mendicant.
pattaṁ ukkujjeyya — “turn the bowl upright” — the discourse's own term for reversing the boycott, restoring the relationship once the eight grounds no longer apply.

The text

The discourse in full: eight grounds for the Saṅgha's boycott, and eight grounds for reversing it. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

Eight grounds for turning the bowl upside down

§1“Mendicants, the Saṅgha may, if it wishes, turn the bowl upside down for a lay follower on eight grounds. What eight? They try to prevent the mendicants from getting material things. They try to harm mendicants. They try to drive mendicants from a monastery. They insult and abuse mendicants. They divide mendicants against each other. They criticize the Buddha, the teaching, and the Saṅgha. The Saṅgha may, if it wishes, turn the bowl upside down for a lay follower on these eight grounds.

Eight grounds for turning it upright again

§2The Saṅgha may, if it wishes, turn the bowl upright for a lay follower on eight grounds. What eight? They don’t try to prevent the mendicants from getting material things. They don’t try to harm mendicants. They don’t try to drive mendicants from a monastery. They don’t insult and abuse mendicants. They don’t divide mendicants against each other. They don’t criticize the Buddha, the teaching, and the Saṅgha. The Saṅgha may, if it wishes, turn the bowl upright for a lay follower on these eight grounds.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

6 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 6
What does 'turning the bowl upside down' refer to?
Correct: B. A formal boycott expressed through a physical, unmistakable act.
Question 2 of 6
What kind of conduct do the eight grounds for this boycott concern?
Correct: B. Deliberate hostile action, not mere disagreement.
Question 3 of 6
Is the boycott described as permanent?
Correct: B. A corrective response to specific behavior, not a permanent severing.
Question 4 of 6
How does the guide characterize this discourse's place in the chapter?
Correct: B. A shift in register, opening a distinct closing run of procedural discourses.
Question 5 of 6
What is one of the eight grounds for the boycott?
Correct: B. One of six named grounds, all concerning active hostility toward the mendicant community.
Question 6 of 6
Is a setting given for this discourse?
Correct: C. A bare formula, matching several other discourses in this chapter.
Answered 0 of 6 · Correct 0