Majjhima Nikāya · Discourse 42

The People of Verañja

Verañjakasutta

Setting
At Verañja, among the brahmin householders
Speakers
The Buddha and the brahmin householders of Verañja
Form
Lay teaching — the same teaching on ten courses of unwholesome and wholesome action as MN 41, delivered to a different audience. The two form a matched pair.
Length
~15 minutes to read
Northern parallel
MĀ 171 (Madhyama-āgama 171)
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — accessible and systematic. Identical in structure and content to MN 41. A good place to consolidate one’s understanding of the ten courses of action by encountering the teaching a second time.

Why this discourse, forty-second

MN 42 is the twin of MN 41. The same teaching — the ten courses of unwholesome and wholesome action — is delivered almost word for word, but now to the brahmin householders of Verañja instead of Sālā. A modern reader might ask: why include both? The answer lies in how the early Buddhist canon was composed and why repetition is not redundancy.

The paired structure tells us something important. The Buddha did not give this teaching once and move on. He gave it wherever he went, to whoever asked, in whatever village he visited. The canon preserves multiple deliveries to show that the teaching is not local — it is not “advice the Buddha gave to the people of Sālā” but a universal ethical framework offered to all laypeople, regardless of where they live.

For the reader, MN 42 serves as a natural review. Having read MN 41, you encounter the same structure again — and repetition deepens comprehension. The early Buddhist tradition understood this: hearing the teaching once is not the same as knowing it. Hearing it a second time, in a slightly different frame, is how the teaching moves from intellectual understanding to internalized knowledge.

MN 42 also closes the pair that opened the fifth chapter (Cūḷayamakavagga) — the “shorter paired chapter.” The pairing is deliberate: each vagga of the Majjhima Nikāya groups discourses thematically, and a matched pair of discourses is a standard structural device. It signals that the editors considered this teaching important enough to preserve in duplicate.

Reading guide

The teaching in one sentence

Beings are reborn according to their actions: ten courses of unwholesome conduct lead to lower realms, and ten courses of wholesome conduct lead to higher realms and ultimately to liberation — the same teaching as MN 41, now delivered to the brahmins of Verañja.

The structure of the discourse

SceneWhat happens
1. The questionThe brahmin householders of Verañja approach the Buddha and ask: “What is the reason that some beings are reborn in a bad place after death, and some in a good place?”
2. The principle“Householders, beings are the owners of their deeds, the heirs of their deeds. It is deeds that divide beings into lower and higher.”
3. Ten unwholesome coursesThree of body: killing, stealing, sexual misconduct. Four of speech: false speech, divisive speech, harsh speech, idle chatter. Three of mind: covetousness, ill will, wrong view.
4. Ten wholesome coursesThe direct opposites: abstaining from killing (with compassion), honesty, proper conduct, truthful speech, harmonizing speech, gentle speech, meaningful speech, contentment, goodwill, right view.
5. ResultsUnwholesome action leads to rebirth in hell, as an animal, or as a ghost. Wholesome action leads to rebirth among humans or gods — or, with deeper practice, to liberation.
6. The brahmins take refugeThe householders go for refuge to the Buddha, the Dhamma, and the Saṅgha as lay followers for life.

What makes MN 42 worth reading after MN 41?

The honest answer is that the doctrinal content is virtually identical. But the discourse rewards reading for three reasons:

1. Repetition as practice. In the oral tradition, hearing a teaching once is exposure; hearing it twice is learning. The early reciter-monks memorized both versions and recited both. The repetition itself was understood as a form of practice — not inefficiency but a deliberate method of deep learning. A modern reader who reads MN 42 after MN 41 will notice that the ten courses of action feel more natural, more remembered, more known.

2. Universality. By preserving the same teaching given to two different groups of brahmins in two different towns, the canon makes a point: this is not situational advice. The Buddha did not tailor the teaching of ethical conduct to local circumstances. The ten courses of action are the same everywhere, for everyone, in every village. The universality is demonstrated, not merely asserted.

3. The paired structure. The Cūḷayamakavagga — the “shorter paired chapter” — pairs discourses deliberately. MN 41–42 form one pair; MN 43–44 will form another. This organizational device tells the reader that the editors of the canon considered this teaching foundational enough to anchor a chapter.

The village of Verañja

Verañja appears in several places in the Pāli canon. It is most famous as the setting for the opening of the Vinaya Piṭaka’s Pārājika section, where the Buddha spends a rainy season at Verañja during a famine. The brahmin Verañja in that account is a single individual; the “brahmin householders of Verañja” in MN 42 are the townspeople as a group, just as in MN 41 the audience is the townspeople of Sālā as a group.

A note on reading twin discourses

When you encounter a “twin” discourse in the Majjhima Nikāya, you have a choice. You can read it fully, treating it as a fresh encounter with the teaching. Or you can read the opening and closing frames (the setting, the audience, the conclusion) and skim the doctrinal body, noting whether any details differ. Both approaches are legitimate. The commentary tradition notes the differences when they exist; when they do not, the commentators simply say the teaching is “the same in every way” (sabbaṃ vuttanayameva).

Key terms

kamma — action; deed. Intentional action of body, speech, or mind that produces results. The central concept: beings are “owners of their deeds, heirs of their deeds.”
kammapatha — course of action. The ten paths of unwholesome or wholesome conduct — not isolated acts but characteristic patterns of behavior.
akusala — unwholesome; unskillful. Actions rooted in greed, hatred, or delusion that lead to suffering.
kusala — wholesome; skillful. Actions rooted in non-greed, non-hatred, or non-delusion that lead to well-being.
adhammacariyā — conduct not in accordance with the teaching; unrighteous conduct. The umbrella term the Buddha uses before spelling out the ten unwholesome courses.
dhammacariyā — conduct in accordance with the teaching; righteous conduct. The umbrella term for the ten wholesome courses. The pairing of adhammacariyā and dhammacariyā is the structural backbone of this discourse.
micchādiṭṭhi — wrong view. The deepest unwholesome mental action: denying the moral order, that actions have consequences, that there are wise teachers who have realized the truth.
sammādiṭṭhi — right view. Here defined as “mundane right view” — the understanding that actions have consequences, that generosity matters, and that there are those who have verified this through direct experience. The foundation of the entire ethical life.

The text

MN 42 follows the same formula as MN 41, with the setting changed to Verañja. The ten courses of action are given in full below, as in MN 41. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

The question

§1So I have heard. At one time the Buddha was staying at Verañja, at the foot of Naleru’s neem tree.

§2The brahmin householders of Verañja heard: “The ascetic Gotama is staying at Verañja, at the foot of Naleru’s neem tree.” They went to the Buddha, and some bowed and sat down to one side, some exchanged greetings and sat down, some raised their joined palms and sat down, some announced their name and clan and sat down, and some simply sat down in silence.

§3Seated to one side, the brahmin householders of Verañja said: “Master Gotama, what is the cause, what is the reason, that some beings here, when the body breaks up after death, are reborn in a place of loss, a bad place, the lower world, hell? And what is the cause, what is the reason, that some beings here, when the body breaks up after death, are reborn in a good place, a heavenly realm?”

§4“Householders, it is because of conduct not in accordance with the teaching, conduct that is unrighteous, that some beings are reborn in a bad place. And it is because of conduct in accordance with the teaching, conduct that is righteous, that some beings are reborn in a good place.”

“We don’t understand the detailed meaning of Master Gotama’s brief statement. Please teach us in detail.”

“Then listen, householders, and pay close attention. I will speak.”

Ten unwholesome courses of action

§5Body. “Householders, there are three kinds of unrighteous conduct of body. Here, someone kills living beings. They are cruel, bloody-handed, given to blows and violence, merciless to living beings.”

“They take what is not given. They steal the property of others, whether in village or forest.”

“They commit sexual misconduct. They have sexual relations with those who are protected by their mother, father, mother and father, brother, sister, or relatives; who are protected by their clan, or by the Dhamma; who have a husband; who are betrothed; or even with one indicated by a garland.”

§6Speech. “There are four kinds of unrighteous conduct of speech. Here, someone speaks falsely. When they are summoned to a council, an assembly, or their relatives, and asked to bear witness — ‘Come, good person, say what you know’ — even though they do not know, they say ‘I know,’ or though they know, they say ‘I don’t know.’ They deliberately speak falsehood for their own sake, for the sake of another, or for some trivial worldly reason.”

“They speak divisively. They repeat what they hear in one place to cause division elsewhere, or repeat what they hear elsewhere to cause division here. They divide those who are united and incite those who are divided. They enjoy discord, delight in discord, love discord, and speak words that create discord.”

“They speak harshly. They say words that are rough, cutting, bitter, and hurtful, that make others angry and upset the mind.”

“They engage in idle chatter. They speak at the wrong time, speak what is not true, speak what is not beneficial, speak what is not the teaching and not the training. Their speech is untimely, unreasonable, rambling, and pointless.”

§7Mind. “There are three kinds of unrighteous conduct of mind. Here, someone is covetous. They covet the possessions of others, thinking: ‘Oh, may what belongs to them become mine!’”

“They have ill will and intentions of hatred, thinking: ‘May these beings be killed, slaughtered, cut off, destroyed, or annihilated!’”

“They have wrong view, a distorted perspective: ‘There is no meaning in giving, sacrifice, or offerings. There is no fruit or result of good or bad deeds. There is no this world or the next. There is no obligation toward mother or father. There are no beings reborn spontaneously. There are no ascetics or brahmins who, practicing rightly, realize for themselves this world and the next and declare it.’”

§8“Householders, it is because of such conduct not in accordance with the teaching, such unrighteous conduct, that some beings here, when the body breaks up after death, are reborn in a place of loss, a bad place, the lower world, hell.”

Ten wholesome courses of action

§9Body. “And what is righteous conduct in accordance with the teaching? Here, someone gives up killing living beings. They lay down the rod and the weapon. They are conscientious and compassionate, dwelling with concern for the welfare of all living beings.”

“They give up taking what is not given. They do not steal the property of others, whether in village or forest.”

“They give up sexual misconduct. They do not have sexual relations with those who are protected.”

§10Speech. “They give up false speech. When summoned to bear witness, they say what they know and no more. They do not deliberately speak falsehood for their own sake, for the sake of another, or for any trivial worldly reason.”

“They give up divisive speech. They do not repeat what they hear in one place to cause division elsewhere. They reconcile those who are divided and strengthen those who are united. They delight in harmony, love harmony, and speak words that create harmony.”

“They give up harsh speech. They speak words that are gentle, pleasing to the ear, affectionate, going to the heart, courteous, dear to many, and agreeable to many.”

“They give up idle chatter. They speak at the right time, speak what is true, speak what is beneficial, speak of the teaching and the training. Their speech is timely, reasonable, well-defined, and connected with the goal.”

§11Mind. “They are contented. They do not covet the possessions of others.”

“They have goodwill and benevolent intentions, thinking: ‘May these beings be free from enmity, free from ill will, free from trouble! May they look after themselves happily!’”

“They have right view, an undistorted perspective: ‘There is meaning in giving, sacrifice, and offerings. There is fruit and result of good and bad deeds. There is this world and the next. There is obligation toward mother and father. There are beings reborn spontaneously. There are ascetics and brahmins who, practicing rightly, realize for themselves this world and the next and declare it.’”

The results

§12“Householders, it is because of such conduct in accordance with the teaching, such righteous conduct, that some beings here, when the body breaks up after death, are reborn in a good place, a heavenly realm.”

§13“If a person who practises the ten wholesome courses of action wishes: ‘May I be reborn among well-to-do nobles, well-to-do brahmins, or well-to-do householders!’ — it is possible that they will be reborn there. Why? Because they practise the ten wholesome courses of action.”

The same formula is repeated for rebirth among the gods of the Four Great Kings, the gods of the Thirty-Three, the Yāma gods, the Tusita gods, the gods who delight in creation, and the gods who lord over the creations of others.

§14“If a person who practises the ten wholesome courses of action wishes: ‘May I, with the ending of the taints, in this very lifetime, realize for myself with direct knowledge the taintless freedom of mind, freedom by wisdom, and dwell having realized it!’ — it is possible. Why? Because they practise the ten wholesome courses of action.”

The brahmins take refuge

§15When this was said, the brahmin householders of Verañja said to the Buddha: “Excellent, Master Gotama! Excellent! As if one were to set upright what had been overturned, or to reveal what was hidden, or to show the way to one who was lost, or to carry a lamp into the dark so that those with eyes could see — in just this way, Master Gotama has made the teaching clear in many ways. We go to Master Gotama for refuge, to the teaching, and to the Saṅgha. From this day forward, may Master Gotama remember us as lay followers who have gone for refuge for life.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
Where is the Buddha staying when the householders approach him in MN 42?
Correct: C. The Buddha is staying at Verañja, at the foot of Naleru’s neem tree. This contrasts with MN 41, where the Buddha is traveling through Kosala and arrives at Sālā. In MN 42, the Buddha is stationary — the householders come to him.
Question 2 of 10
What is the relationship between MN 42 and MN 41?
Correct: B. MN 42 is a near-identical twin of MN 41. The teaching on the ten courses of action is the same; only the setting (Verañja instead of Sālā) and audience (the brahmin householders of Verañja instead of those of Sālā) differ. The canon preserves both to demonstrate the universality of the teaching.
Question 3 of 10
How many courses of unwholesome action does the Buddha teach?
Correct: A. The ten courses of unwholesome action are organized by three “doors”: body (killing, stealing, sexual misconduct), speech (false speech, divisive speech, harsh speech, idle chatter), and mind (covetousness, ill will, wrong view). Speech has the most entries — four — reflecting how much of daily ethical life takes place through language.
Question 4 of 10
Which of the following is a mental course of unwholesome action, not a verbal one?
Correct: D. Ill will (byāpāda) is a mental unwholesome course, not a verbal one. It is the wish for harm: “May these beings be killed, slaughtered, destroyed.” The four verbal courses are false speech, divisive speech, harsh speech, and idle chatter. The distinction between mental and verbal is important: ill will is an internal disposition, while the speech courses are outward expressions.
Question 5 of 10
What does the Buddha say is the wholesome counterpart of idle chatter?
Correct: C. The wholesome counterpart of idle chatter is not silence but purposeful speech: speaking at the right time, speaking what is true, speaking what is beneficial, and speaking what is “connected with the goal.” The Buddha does not ask people to stop talking — he asks them to make their speech timely, honest, helpful, and relevant.
Question 6 of 10
In this discourse, what is “right view” defined as?
Correct: A. Right view in MN 42 (as in MN 41) is “mundane right view” (lokiya sammādiṭṭhi) — the basic moral understanding: there is meaning in giving; there are results of good and bad deeds; there is this world and the next; there are wise teachers who have realized the truth. This is the entry-level right view that makes ethical conduct possible, distinct from the deeper “supramundane right view” taught elsewhere.
Question 7 of 10
What is the highest possible result of practising the ten wholesome courses of action?
Correct: B. After listing progressively higher rebirths — from wealthy humans to the various heavenly realms — the Buddha concludes with the highest possibility: “With the ending of the taints, in this very lifetime, realize the taintless freedom of mind, freedom by wisdom.” Ethical conduct is the foundation not only for a better rebirth but for complete liberation.
Question 8 of 10
Why does the Pāli canon preserve both MN 41 and MN 42 when the teaching is essentially the same?
Correct: D. The paired structure is intentional. By preserving the same teaching given to different groups in different towns, the canon demonstrates that the ten courses of action are a universal teaching, not situation-specific advice. In the oral tradition, encountering a teaching twice was considered essential for moving from surface understanding to internalized knowledge.
Question 9 of 10
Which chapter (vagga) of the Majjhima Nikāya do MN 41 and MN 42 belong to?
Correct: C. MN 41–42 open the fifth chapter, the Cūḷayamakavagga (“shorter paired chapter”). The chapter’s name reflects its structural principle: discourses are organized in thematic pairs. MN 41–42 are the first such pair; MN 43–44 form another.
Question 10 of 10
What do the brahmin householders of Verañja do at the end of the discourse?
Correct: A. As in MN 41, the householders take the three refuges and become lay followers (upāsaka) for life. This is the standard response of moved laypeople in the canon — a commitment to the path as householders, not as monks. The identical ending in both MN 41 and MN 42 underscores that the teaching has the same effect wherever it is given.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0