Reading guide
A familiar pattern retraced before new ground is broken
The discourse's first half is a close repetition of SN 12.24's structure — the fourfold question, Sāriputta's reduction to contact, Ānanda's report, the Buddha's confirmation — establishing continuity before the discourse moves into genuinely new territory.
Three channels named, not left as one general category
Rather than speaking of action in general, the Buddha distinguishes bodily, verbal, and mental action specifically, each identified as its own distinct channel through which pleasure and pain can arise internally.
A further distinction within each channel
Each of the three channels is further split by two additional questions: was the action self-instigated or instigated by another, and was it done with deliberation or without — producing a genuinely detailed map of how experience actually comes about.
Ignorance found in every branch of the map
No matter which combination of channel, source, and deliberation is in play, the discourse states plainly that ignorance is included in all of them — even self-instigated, carefully deliberated action remains conditioned by ignorance unless that ignorance has actually ceased.
A conclusion stated in terms of absence, not just presence
The discourse doesn't only describe how pleasure and pain arise while ignorance persists; it closes by describing what happens when ignorance fully fades away — the entire basis for such arising simply ceases to exist, described fourfold as no field, no ground, no basis, no foundation remaining.
Key terms
The text
§1Then in the late afternoon, Venerable Bhūmija came out of retreat, went to Venerable Sāriputta, and exchanged greetings with him. When the greetings and polite conversation were over, he sat down to one side and said to him: “Reverend Sāriputta, there are ascetics and brahmins who teach the efficacy of deeds. Some of them declare that pleasure and pain are made by oneself. Some of them declare that pleasure and pain are made by another. Some of them declare that pleasure and pain are made by both oneself and another. Some of them declare that pleasure and pain arise anomalously, not made by oneself or another. What does the Buddha say about this? How does he explain it? How should we answer so as to repeat what the Buddha has said, and not misrepresent him with an untruth? How should we explain in line with his teaching, with no legitimate grounds for rebuttal and criticism?”
§2“Reverend, the Buddha has said that pleasure and pain are dependently originated. Dependent on what? Dependent on contact. In speaking like this, you would repeat what the Buddha has said, and not misrepresent him with an untruth. You would explain in line with his teaching, and there would be no legitimate grounds for rebuttal and criticism. Consider the ascetics and brahmins who teach the efficacy of deeds. In the case of those who declare that pleasure and pain are made by oneself, that’s dependent on contact. … In the case of those who declare that pleasure and pain arise anomalously, not made by oneself or another, that’s also dependent on contact. Consider the ascetics and brahmins who teach the efficacy of deeds. In the case of those who declare that pleasure and pain are made by oneself, it’s impossible that they will experience that without contact. … In the case of those who declare that pleasure and pain arise anomalously, not made by oneself or another, it’s impossible that they will experience that without contact.”
§3Venerable Ānanda heard this discussion between Venerable Sāriputta and Venerable Bhūmija. Then Venerable Ānanda went up to the Buddha, bowed, sat down to one side, and informed the Buddha of all they had discussed. “Good, good, Ānanda! It’s just as Sāriputta has so rightly explained. I have said that pleasure and pain are dependently originated. Dependent on what? Dependent on contact. In speaking like this, you would repeat what I have said, and not misrepresent me with an untruth. You would explain in line with my teaching, and there would be no legitimate grounds for rebuttal and criticism.
§4Ānanda, as long as there’s a body, the intention that gives rise to bodily action causes pleasure and pain to arise in oneself. As long as there’s a voice, the intention that gives rise to verbal action causes pleasure and pain to arise in oneself. As long as there’s a mind, the intention that gives rise to mental action causes pleasure and pain to arise in oneself. But this is only when dependent on ignorance.
§5By oneself one instigates the choice that gives rise to bodily, verbal, and mental action, conditioned by which that pleasure and pain arise in oneself. Or else others instigate the choice … One instigates the choice after deliberation … Or else one instigates the choice without deliberation …
§6Ignorance is included in all these things. But when ignorance fades away and ceases with no residue left behind, that body, that voice, and that mind no longer exist dependent on which that pleasure and pain arise in oneself. That field does not exist, that ground does not exist, that basis does not exist, that foundation does not exist, dependent on which that pleasure and pain arise in oneself.”
Self-check quiz
Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.