Reading guide
The third iteration of a now-familiar pattern
By this point in the chapter, the fourfold question and its reduction to contact has appeared in close succession across several discourses; this reading guide treats this repetition honestly rather than searching for a distinction the text itself doesn't draw.
Asked directly, without a relayed conversation
Unlike SN 12.24 and SN 12.25, where the question first passes through Sāriputta and is only later confirmed by the Buddha via Ānanda's report, here Upavāṇa poses the question directly to the Buddha, with no intermediary narrative at all.
Suffering specifically, not the broader pleasure and pain
This discourse returns to SN 12.24's narrower topic of suffering alone, rather than SN 12.25's broader framing around pleasure and pain together.
No extended taxonomy this time
Where SN 12.25 went on to distinguish bodily, verbal, and mental channels of action, this discourse ends immediately after the core reduction, without extending into that further analysis.
Economy itself as the point worth noticing
Read after its two companions, this discourse's real interest lies in its brevity: the same insight, stripped down to its barest form, still lands with the same force.
Key terms
The text
§1Then Venerable Upavāṇa went up to the Buddha, bowed, sat down to one side, and said to him: “Sir, there are some ascetics and brahmins who declare that suffering is made by oneself. There are some who declare that suffering is made by another. There are some who declare that suffering is made by both oneself and another. There are some who declare that suffering arises anomalously, not made by oneself or another. What does the Buddha say about this? How does he explain it? How should we answer so as to repeat what the Buddha has said, and not misrepresent him with an untruth? How should we explain in line with his teaching, with no legitimate grounds for rebuttal and criticism?”
§2“Upavāṇa, I have said that suffering is dependently originated. Dependent on what? Dependent on contact. In speaking like this, you would repeat what I have said, and not misrepresent me with an untruth. You would explain in line with my teaching, and there would be no legitimate grounds for rebuttal and criticism.
§3In the case of those ascetics and brahmins who declare that suffering is made by oneself, that’s dependent on contact. … In the case of those who declare that suffering arises anomalously, not made by oneself or another, that’s also dependent on contact. In the case of those ascetics and brahmins who declare that suffering is made by oneself, it’s impossible that they will experience that without contact. … In the case of those who declare that suffering arises anomalously, not made by oneself or another, it’s impossible that they will experience that without contact.”
Self-check quiz
Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.