Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 14.14

Inferior Convictions

Hīnādhimuttikasutta

Setting
Sāvatthī
Speakers
The Buddha alone, addressing the assembled mendicants
Form
One claim, restated across four time frames — a general statement, the past, the future, and the present again
Length
~2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★☆☆☆☆ — among the simplest and most widely quoted discourses in this saṃyutta

Why this discourse

Building directly on SN 14.13's threefold grading, this discourse states what may be this saṃyutta's most quoted single claim: sentient beings join together and converge simply because of an element — those of inferior conviction with others of inferior conviction, those of good conviction with others of good conviction. What makes the discourse distinctive isn't the claim's content, already implicit in SN 14.13's grading, but its scope: the Buddha states it once for the present, then insists it held equally in the past and will hold equally in the future, before restating it a final time for the present — a claim about how beings sort themselves that the discourse frames as true at every point in time, not just here and now.

Reading guide

A direct continuation of SN 14.13's grading

Where the previous discourse graded perception, view, and rebirth by their element, this one draws out a social consequence: beings of matching grade don't just resemble each other, they actually converge and associate together.

Only two categories, not three

Unlike SN 14.13's hīna/majjhima/paṇīta threefold grading, this discourse names only two — hīnādhimuttikā and kalyāṇādhimuttikā, inferior conviction and good conviction — a simpler, starker division.

Four time frames, not one

The claim is stated for the present, then for the past, then for the future, then restated for the present once more — a structure emphasizing that this isn't a passing observation but something the discourse treats as constant across all time.

Elided repetition carrying real weight

The past and future sections are given in full Pali but left untranslated for their repeated middle clauses, trusting the reader to carry forward the present tense's wording — brevity standing in for what would otherwise be near-total repetition.

A teaching recognizable outside the canon

The core claim — that like-minded people converge with one another — will be immediately familiar to readers from ordinary experience and from proverbs in many languages, though this discourse roots it specifically in dhātu, element, rather than treating it as simple social observation.

Key terms

sattā saṁsandanti samenti — “sentient beings join together and converge” — this discourse's central, repeated claim.
hīnādhimuttikā — “those of inferior conviction” — one of the two categories this discourse's beings sort themselves into.
kalyāṇādhimuttikā — “those of good conviction” — the second category, converging only with others of the same kind.
dhātusova — “simply because of an element” — the discourse's insistence that this convergence has one specific cause, not a vague social tendency.
atītampi … anāgatampi … etarahipi — “in the past too … in the future too … at present too” — the three-time-frame structure universalizing this discourse's claim.

The text

The discourse in full, including the source's own elision of the past and future sections' repeated clauses. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At Sāvatthī. “Mendicants, sentient beings join together and converge because of an element. Those who have inferior convictions join together and converge with those who have inferior convictions. Those who have good convictions join together and converge with those who have good convictions.

§2In the past, too, sentient beings came together and converged because of an element. …

§3In the future, too, sentient beings will join together and converge because of an element. …

§4At present, too, sentient beings join together and converge because of an element. Those who have inferior convictions join together and converge with those who have inferior convictions. Those who have good convictions join together and converge with those who have good convictions.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What is this discourse's central claim?
Correct: A. The discourse's repeated core statement, restated across four time frames.
Question 2 of 10
How many categories of conviction does this discourse name, compared to SN 14.13's threefold grading?
Correct: A. A simpler, two-way division rather than SN 14.13's hīna/majjhima/paṇīta.
Question 3 of 10
Across how many time frames is this discourse's claim stated?
Correct: A. Present, past, future, and present once more, emphasizing constancy across time.
Question 4 of 10
What happens to the past and future sections' repeated clauses in the source?
Correct: A. Brevity standing in for near-total repetition of the present-tense wording.
Question 5 of 10
What single cause does this discourse attribute convergence to?
Correct: A. Dhātusova, "simply because of an element," grounds the claim specifically.
Question 6 of 10
How does this discourse relate to SN 14.13, the discourse immediately before it?
Correct: A. A natural extension: beings of matching grade don't just resemble each other, they converge.
Question 7 of 10
What familiar idea does this discourse's core claim resemble, though it grounds the claim differently?
Correct: A. A widely recognizable pattern, here rooted specifically in dhātu rather than left as folk wisdom.
Question 8 of 10
Who is the sole speaker in this discourse?
Correct: A. No interlocutor or visitor appears; the Buddha teaches directly.
Question 9 of 10
Where does the Buddha deliver this teaching?
Correct: A. Back to Sāvatthī, after SN 14.13's one-discourse departure.
Question 10 of 10
What numbering tag closes this discourse?
Correct: A. The fourth discourse of Dutiyavagga.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0